National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSE) in support of GEO-CAPE science and measurement
requirements definition
Kevin W. Bowman1,2,Paul Hamer1, Stanley Sander1,2, Annmarie Eldering1,2,
Reinhard Beer1
1Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of Technology
2Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and EngineeringUniversity of California, Los Angeles
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
2
The EOS era• The Earth Observing System (EOS) for which the A-train is
the flagship constellation, has provided unprecedented knowledge of atmospheric composition
What’s next?
• The A-train will no longer exist in its present form within 5-10 years.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
NRC Decadal Survey
National Research Council (NRC) has presented a road map for the next generation of Earth remote sensing instruments for NASA
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
GEO-CAPEGEO-CAPE is a geostationary sounder over North America. It’s scientific objectives are:1) improving air quality forecasts
through chemical data assimilation;
2) monitoring pollutant emissions and accidental releases, and
3) understanding pollution transport on regional to intercontinental scales.
What kind of instrumentation can build on the A-train experience and satisfy these science requirements?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
Panspectral Fourier Transform Spectrometer (PanFTS)
PanFTS
TES GOSAT SCIAMACHY
PanFTS
TES GOSAT SCIAMACHY
PanFTS will combine theFunctionality of severalInstruments e.g. TES,GOSAT, Sciamachy
Wide spectral coverage(0.27 – 15 mm) permitssimultaneous observationsBy reflected sunlight andThermal emission (day/night)
PollutantsO3, CO, NO2, HCHO, NH3
Greenhouse GasesCO2, CH4, N2O, O3, H2O
TracersHDO, N2O, O2, O4
Ocean Color250 m pixel size:visible channel
From NASA IIP Panspectral FTS, Stanley Sander, PI
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
6
900 km x 900 km ground swath patch
128x128 FPA
Spectra in pixel
PanFTS Observing Scenario
• Geostationary orbit near 80 W longitude• Sequential imaging of 49 patches• 900 km x 900 km IFOV using 128x128 pixel array (7 km resolution)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
Impact of UV-Vis-IR on assimilated ozone
Ozone pseudo-observations of a virtual GEO-CAPE instrument are assimilated into a model.
The top panel panel uses a virtualinstrument that measures infrared (IR) radiances to infer ozone concentrations.
The bottom panel uses a virtual instrument that measures both infrared along with ultraviolet and visible radiation (UV-Vis-IR).
The UV-Vis-IR changes the ozone prediction by up to a factor of 2 compared to the IR-only case.
A pan-spectral UV-Vis-IR Fourier Transform Spectrometer is currently support for GEO-CAPE by a NASA IIP- Stan Sander PI
Does combining UV-Vis-IR radiance measurements improve air quality predictions over IR-only?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
Sensitivity Analysis: August 1st, 2006, sensitivity of NY ozone at 2:30 pm to its precursors
target regionregion of maximum sensitivity of boundary layer ozone in New York to free tropospheric NOx
The sensitivity of ozone in NY to free tropospheric NOx on 7/29/06 over Nebraska roughly half of the sensitivity to local NOx on 08/01/06
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
How sensitive is ozone to local NOx?
Boundary layer ozone is sensitiveto local NOx up to 3 days before
Strong diurnal variation
Highest sensitivity to morning NOx
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
The maximum sensitivity of ozone in NY to free troposphericozone is roughly .2 two days before.
Does knowing free tropospheric ozone improve boundary layer ozone prediction?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
Does knowing ozone today improveozone predictability for the following day?
The sensitivity of ozone to ozoneon 07/31/08 is about half of ozone on 08/01/08
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
12
BACKUP
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadena, California
Air quality predictions with satellites in GEO vs LEO
OSSE configuration:
A “nature” model ozone fields are sampledwith both a low-orbit and geo-stationaryorbit virtual platforms to create pseudo-observations.
These pseudo-observations are assimilated into a “standard” model to pull its ozone fields to the nature model.
Surface ozone from assimilation of IR satellite in LEO is shown in top panel
Surface ozone from assimilation of IR satellite in GEO is shown in bottom panel
Air quality predictions with satellites in GEO have clear advantages over satellites in LEO