Date post: | 14-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jordan-underwood |
View: | 222 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Keyser and Shapiro (1986)
Keyser, D. and M. A. Shapiro, 1986: A review of the structure and dynamics of upper-level frontal zones. Mon. Wea. Rev. 114, 452–499.
s
nTime = t
T
T-
T- 2TT- 3T
T- 4T
T- 5T
T- 6T
T- 7T
T- 8T
s
nTime = t + t
TT- T- 2TT- 3TT- 4TT- 5TT- 6TT- 7TT- 8T
pnnn
v
ndt
d n Fronts exist in a kinematic sense due to deformation in the presence of a thermal gradient and tilting of vertical thermal gradients
Before
n
z
After
n
z
nn
vn
pn
p
VkVff
dt
dpp
Absolute vorticity is generated along parcel trajectories by horizontal convergence and tilting of vertical shear.
CONVERGENCE
Early models of the structure of upper level fronts1937 1949
1952 1959
Bjerknes and Palmen (1937)Palmen and Nagler (1949)Berggren (1952)Reed and Danielson (1959)
Fig. 1
Note different conceptual ideas of the interface of the front with the stratosphere
Temperature
Pot. Temp.
Note folded tropopause
Front envisioned to separate polar and tropical air at all altitudes – stratosphere distinct from front, and isolated from troposphere except for diffusion
-- Vertical extension of surface front Fig. 2Bjerknes and Palmen (1937)
Geostrophic wind normal to cross section, temperature
Cross section normal to front on 5 Feb 1947
Folded tropopause is replaced by a “break region” separating the tropospheric frontal layer and the tropopause over the tropical and polar air
Palmen and Nagler (1949)
Front is a zone of concentrated cyclonic and vertical shear
Jet over frontal zone
Fig. 3
Berggren (1952)
Potential temperature and observed wind speed
Cross section normal to front on 9 Nov 1949
Tropospheric frontal zone is extended into the stratosphere
Frontal zone defined by strong cyclonic wind shear
Fig. 4
Reed and Danielson (1959)Geostrophic wind normal to cross section Temperature
Potential VorticityPotential Temperature
Tropopause on polar side joined to base of frontal zone
Tropopause on tropical side joined to top of frontal zone Frontal zone region of:
• High potential vorticity (stratospheric intrusion of air)• Strong cyclonic and vertical shear• Sharp temperature and potential temperature gradient• Isentropes approximately parallel to frontal surface
p
fP
Fig. 5
Stratospheric air
Difference in thinking:
NEW: Upper tropospheric fronts:
Separate stratospheric and tropospheric air Form as a result of tilting of the horizontal temperature gradient and vorticity
OLD: Upper tropospheric fronts
Separate tropical and polar air Form as a result of confluence between polar and tropical airmasses
p
VkVff
dt
dpp
pnnn
v
ndt
d n
In this view: Upper and lower tropospheric fronts can arise independently Upper tropospheric fronts do not have to extend to the surface
Absolute Geostrophic Momentum
fyum g ug = along front (x) component of geostrophic windf = Coriolis parametery = cross front coordinate, positive toward colder air
Relationship of to 3-D absolute geostrophic vorticity vector
into screen (along front) m1 m2
Frontal zone
p
mk
y
mjm
2
i
2g2gm
y
mk
p
mjmig
22
If there are no along front variations and the front is straight
Vertical component of vorticity
Horizontal component of vorticity
Recent advances in our understanding of upper level fronts
1
2
3
4
5
y
m1 m2 m3 m4 m5
x
p
Barotropic Atmosphere (no temperature gradient)
m surfaces and surfaces in a barotropic and baroclinic environment
1
2
3
4
5
y
m1 m2 m3 m4 m5
x
p
Baroclinic Atmosphere (temperature gradient)
Because of temperature gradientgeostrophic wind increases with heightAnd m surfaces tilt since m = ug - fy
m only a function of f along y direction
Relationship of to potential temperaturem
yp
m
p
v
c
c
p
p
fp
R
0
0
where
Pot. Temp and wind speed Potential Vorticity
Absolute Angular Momentum Absolute Angular Momentum/Pot Temp
TropopauseAnd fronts
Cyclonic Shear Boundary
Extremely high resolution measurements of frontal structure made with a research aircraft supplemented by sondes (Shapiro 1981)
In pressure coordinates, potential vorticity takes the following form:
pp yp
m
py
mP
2
Potential vorticity is:
Large and positive (stable stratospheric air) where the area of the boxes formed by the intersection of m and lines is small
Small and positive (stable tropospheric air) where the area of the boxes is large
Negative (either inertially, convectively, and/or symmetrically unstable) when the slope of the lines exceeds the slope of the m lines
For adiabatic processes (no friction, no diabatic heating, no mixing) potential vorticity is conserved.
Question: Where does the high values of potential vorticity at the inflection point come from?
Clear air turbulence (CAT):
The shear zones associated with fronts are zones of extreme CAT
CAT mixes warm air downward above the level of maximum winds and cold air upward below the level of maximum winds
CAT limits frontal scale collapse to about 100 km
Warming rates due to vertical flux of heat
Upper level frontal zones, potential vorticity anomalies and ozone concentrations
Potential temperature and winds Potential vorticity Ozone
Ozone is a tracer on the time scale of frontogenesis.
Ozone from the stratosphere can intrude all the way to the ground within frontal zones in exceptionally strong fronts!
CAT and Tropospheric-Stratospheric exchange: Chloroflorocarbons go up and radioactivity from the 1950s nuclear bomb tests comes down!
Consider a jetstreak propagating around and through the base of a trough:
Baroclinic instability-wave amplifying
Warm advection
Cold Advection
Baroclinic wave maximum intensity
Cold Advection
Baroclinic wave weakening
What is the impact of cold and warm advection on the ageostrophic circulation about the front and upper level frontogenesis?
We will first look at numerical simulations for
a) a straight jet with confluence only b) a straight jet dominated by warm advection aloftc) a straight jet dominated by cold advection aloft
Then look at theory for these situations and expected patterns of vertical motion
Then look at observations to see how these predictions hold up
Then add in the effect of flow curvature
Procedure:
(Note: Paper does this in the opposite way (observation, theory, simulation), but it is more difficult to understand
Y (km) Y (km)
Y axis Y axis
Y axis Y axis
Pure confluenceacting on gradient
Shear acting on gradientWinds stronger on right leadingTo dominance of cold advection
Shear acting on gradientWinds stronger on left leadingTo dominance of warm advection
Model is 2-D, but the assumed flow that is the basis for the 2D simulation is shown here for the 438 mb level
Symmetric direct circulation about the front with warm air rising and cold air sinking.
Westerly jet on warm side, easterly at low levels on cold side. Air parcels converge and descend in frontal zone
and cross front geostrophic wind
0 hr
48 hr
and along front geostrophic wind
and ageostrophic circulation
24 hr
48 hr
and 48 hr trajectories
Direct circulation displaced toward cold air so that warm air rising along part of frontal zone.
Westerly jet on warm side, easterly at low levels on cold side. Shear zone more defined. Air parcels descend in frontal zone on cold side, ascend on warm side.
and cross front geostrophic wind
0 hr
48 hr
and along front geostrophic wind
and ageostrophic circulation
24 hr
48 hr
and 48 hr trajectories
Direct circulation displaced toward warm air so that warm air sinks into frontal zone
This leads to a frontal split, with the upper level front distinct from the lower level front.
and cross front geostrophic wind
0 hr
48 hr
and along front geostrophic wind
and ageostrophic circulation
24 hr
48 hr
and 48 hr trajectories
Note that the model solutions we just examined are all for confluent flow. Therefore, they apply to a jetstreak’s entrance region. The opposite patterns will apply in a jetstreak’s exit region
The theory used to diagnose the circulation about fronts derives from the semi-geostrophic system of equations
Assume:
We have an east-west front
The change in the Coriolis parameter across the frontal zone can be ignored (f = constant)
The geostrophic wind in the x direction (along front) >> that the ageostrophic wind along front (ug >> uag).
In this case, the total derivative in pressure coordinates can be expressed as
py
vvx
utdt
daggg
The u momentum equation usingabsolute momentum:
xFfvxdt
du
Note that: p
fy
y
fyv
x
fyu
t
fy
dt
fydg
)()()()()( X X X
fvy
fyv
dt
fyd
)()( Add this equation to the u
Momentum equation to get:
xFxdt
fyud
dt
dm
)(
dt
d The thermodynamic equation: the rate of change of potential temperaturefollowing a parcel equals the diabatic heating rate .
yfug
1
xfvg
1 0
y
v
x
u gg
The u momentum equation
Geostrophic wind relationships
0
py
v
py
v
y
v
x
u
py
v
x
u agaggg Continuity equation
Governing equations applying geostrophic momentum approximation
xFxdt
dm
dt
d0
py
vag
u momentum equation thermodynamic equation continuity equation
Note also that we can define a streamfunction such that
and we will satisfy the continuity equation. ypvag
,
With this system of equations we seek a solution for the cross frontal circulation. To derive this, we must develop prognostic equations for the:
In the interest of time, I will derive the absolute vorticity and leave the other derivations to you…..
Absolute vorticity
The components of the cross frontal thermal wind balance
The static stability
y
m
yp
m
p
p
m
y
mv
y
mv
x
mu
t
m
ydt
dm
y aggg
y
m
pp
m
yy
m
yv
y
m
y
v
y
m
yv
y
m
y
v
y
m
xu
x
m
y
u
y
m
tdt
dm
y
ag
agg
gg
g
p
m
yy
m
y
v
y
m
y
v
x
m
y
u
y
m
dt
d
dt
dm
yaggg
xFxdt
dm
Expand d/dt operator
Take y derivative
Consolidate terms that compose d/dt (m/ y)
Momentum equation
p
m
yy
m
y
v
y
m
y
v
x
m
y
uF
xyy
m
dt
d agggx
Substitute momentum equation
and rearrange
p
m
yy
m
y
v
y
m
y
v
x
m
y
uFfv
yy
m
dt
d agggxg
Substitute
geostrophic wind to eliminate
p
fyu
yy
fyu
y
v
y
fyu
y
v
x
fyu
y
u
y
F
y
vf
y
m
dt
d ggagggggxg
p
m
yy
m
y
v
y
m
y
v
x
m
y
uFfv
yy
m
dt
d agggxg
Expand first term on
RHS and use m=ug-fy
p
u
yy
vf
y
u
y
v
y
vf
y
u
y
v
x
u
y
u
y
F
y
vf
y
m
dt
d gaggaggggggxg
p
u
yy
vf
y
u
y
v
y
F
y
v
x
u
y
u
y
vff
y
m
dt
d gaggagxgggg
Rearrange and cancel terms that add up to zero
Write individual terms
X X
p
fyu
yy
fyu
y
v
y
F
y
m
dt
d ggagx
Write remaining terms in terms of m
p
m
yy
m
y
v
y
F
y
m
dt
d agx
p
m
yy
m
py
F
y
m
dt
d x
Substitute for vag/ y from continuity eqn
p
m
yy
m
py
F
y
m
dt
d x
Vorticity Equation
p
F
y
v
p
m
y
m
p
v
p
u
y
v
p
v
y
u
p
m
dt
d xagaggggg
Other equations I will not derive:
Components inThermal wind eqn
dy
d
dp
d
p
m
pypyp
u
y
v
p
v
y
u
ydt
d gggg
ln
ppy
v
p
v
ypdt
d agag
Static stability
Changes in static stability and vorticity depend on the ageostrophic circulation
To maintain thermal wind balance, the terms on the left hand side of each of the two lower equations must be equal. We can subtract equations to get…
dy
d
p
F
p
u
y
v
p
v
y
u
dp
d
p
m
pypyy
v
p
m
y
m
p
v
xgggg
agag
2
ln
ypvag
,Now use the definition of the streamfunction to reduce this to a single equation in one unknown
dy
d
p
F
p
u
y
v
p
v
y
u
ydp
d
p
m
py
m
pyp
m
yp
xgggg
2
ln2
2
22
2
2
The equation above was originally derived by Sawyer (1956) for the special case of no along front variations in potential temperature, and modified by Eliassen (1962) to the form above.
The equation is therefore called the “Sawyer-Eliassen Equation”
dy
d
p
F
p
u
y
v
p
v
y
u
ydp
d
p
m
py
m
pyp
m
yp
xgggg
2
ln2
2
22
2
2
Right side of equation represent the forcing (known from measurements or in model solution)
Static stability Baroclinicity (thermal wind) Inertial stability
Geostrophic deformation Friction Diabatic heating
, the streamfunction, is the response
Solutions for can be obtained provided lateral and top/bottom boundary conditions are specified and the potential vorticity is positive in the domain
(air is inertially, convectively and symmetrically [slantwise] stable).
Nature of the solution of the Sawyer-Eliassen Equation:
A direct circulation (warm air rising and cold air sinking) will result with positive forcing.
An indirect circulation (warm air sinking and cold air rising) will result with negative forcing.
Cold air Warm air
Isentrope
Cold air Warm air
Isentrope
Dynamics of frontogenesis
On the figure on the left, Dashed lines: potential temperatureBlue lines: pressure surfaces (exaggerated)Shading: isotachs (blue into screen, red out)
A conceptual model of the ageostrophic circulation caused by frontogenesis
Geostrophically-balancedweak front
2. Impulsively intensify front
Stronger temperature gradientleads to more steeply sloped
pressure surfaces and an increasein the pressure gradient force
at both high and low levels
1. Initial condition
Dynamics of frontogenesisA conceptual model of the ageostrophic circulation caused by frontogenesis
2. Impulsively intensify front
Stronger temperature gradientleads to more steeply sloped
pressure surfaces and an increasein the pressure gradient force
at both high and low levels
3. Air accelerates
Air rises on warm sideAir descends on cold side
Air accelerates along isentropes toward cold air and into screen aloftAir accelerates toward warm air and
out of screen in low levels
Dynamics of frontogenesisA conceptual model of the ageostrophic circulation caused by frontogenesis
3. Air accelerates
Air rises on warm sideAir descends on cold side
Air accelerates toward cold air and into screen aloft
Air accelerates toward warm air andout of screen in low levels
Air cools at moistAdiabatic lapse rate
Air warms at dryAdiabatic lapse rate
4. Balance is restored
- Air rises and cools on warm side- Air sinks and warms on cold side- counteracts effects of frontogenesis
-Wind speed in upper jet increases (into screen)-Wind speed in lower jet increases (out of screen) - Coriolis force increases- Geostrophic balance restored
The circulation describe in the last few slides can be seen clearly on the frontillustrated on the cross section below
p
u
y
v
p
v
y
u gggg2In the absence of diabatic heating and friction, the forcing for the SW circulation can be expressed as
Using the thermal wind relationship yp
m
And the expression for the non-
divergence of the geostrophic wind0
y
v
x
u gg
This expression can be written:
xy
u
yx
u gg 2
Consider a jetstreak where =0
In the entrance quadrant ug increases with xwhile decreases with y.
x
02
xy
u
yx
u gg DIRECTCIRCULATION
02
xy
u
yx
u gg INDIRECTCIRCULATION
In the exit quadrant ug decreases with xwhile decreases with y.
p
u
y
v
p
v
y
u gggg2In the absence of diabatic heating and friction, the forcing for the SW circulation can be expressed as
Using the thermal wind relationship yp
m
And the expression for the non-
divergence of the geostrophic wind0
y
v
x
u gg
This expression can be written:
xy
u
yx
u gg 2
Consider a shear zone along a temperature gradient where =0
ug decreases with y while increases with x.
INDIRECTCIRCULATION
02
xy
u
yx
u gg
x
ug
Cold advection pattern corresponds to an indirect circulation
Warm advection pattern corresponds to an direct circulation
Correspondingly:
Example of solution of the Sawyer-Eliassen equation
The circulation about an ideal frontal zone characterized by
Confluence (top)
Shear (bottom)
Streamlines of ageostrophic circulation (thick solid lines)Isotachs of ug (denoted U) (dashed lines)Isotachs fo vg (denoted V) (thin solid lines)
IMPACT OF THERMAL ADVECTION ON JETSTREAKS
In the following diagrams: (+) means positive (downward motion) (-) means negative (upward motion) Circulation is direct if upward motion (-) is south of downward motion (+) since cold air lies to north
Jetstreak with no temperature gradient along jet axis: direct circulation in entrance, indirect in exit, symmetric around the axis of the jetstreak
Jetstreak with temperature gradient along jet axis: cold air advection maximum along jet axis. Air descends along jet axis creating two direct circulations, one on either side of of jet.
rarely occurs!
IMPACT OF THERMAL ADVECTION ON JETSTREAKS
In the following diagrams: (+) means positive (downward motion) (-) means negative (upward motion) Circulation is direct if upward motion (-) is south of downward motion (+) since cold air lies to north
Jetstreak with cold advection: direct circulation in entrance shifted to south side of jetstreak axis, indirect circulation shifted to north side of jetstreak axis.
Common when jetstreak is on west side of trough
Common when jetstreak is on east side of trough
Jetstreak with warm advection: direct circulation in entrance shifted to north side of jetstreak axis, indirect circulation shifted to south side of jetstreak axis.
Schematic illustration of tropopause folding and the development of an upper level frontal zone
Corresponding example in the real world
Warm air
DirectCell
IndirectCell
Cold air
Active mixing and exchange layer
The complete description of a jetstreak passing through a baroclinic wave must also include the effects of flow curvature
Curvature shifts the direct circulation in jet entrance region toward north side of jet axis
Curvature shifts the indirect circulation in jet exit region toward north side of jet axis
Relationship of upper level fronts to evolving baroclinic waves
1000 mb height, 500 mb height, surface frontStippling: precipitationCross hatching: 500 mb frontal zoneLines: cross sections on next figures
Front distinct Front diffuse Fronts distinct
Front distinctFront diffuse
ON CROSS SECTION
On the previous panel:
Jestreak propagates from W side of trough to E side
Frontal structure on corresponding cross sections is distinct on W side, then both sides, then E side – upper level frontogenesis is tied to the secondary circulations about the jet
Strong jetSharp front
Tilting dominantFrotogenetic process
Frontal zone advected around trough and enhanced by confluence