+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Klebsiella pneumoniae dairy

Klebsiella pneumoniae dairy

Date post: 21-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: maying-pilapil-amante
View: 362 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
19
Identification and Molecular Characterization of Antimicrobial Resistance and Genetic Characteristics of Zoonotic Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from a Dairy Farm in Laguna, Philippines Flor Marie Immanuelle R. Pilapil 561 01180 31 (Master in Veterinary Science) Research Methodology February 19, 2014 1 Dr. Rungtip Chuanchuen - Program Adviser Associate Professor Department of Veterinary Public Health Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University Dr. Hope Rovira - Thesis Adviser Associate Professor Department of Paraclinical Sciences College of Veterinary Medicine, University of the Philippines
Transcript

Identification and Molecular Characterization

of Antimicrobial Resistance and

Genetic Characteristics of Zoonotic

Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates

from a Dairy Farm in Laguna, Philippines

Flor Marie Immanuelle R. Pilapil561 01180 31 (Master in Veterinary Science)

Research MethodologyFebruary 19, 2014

1

Dr. Rungtip Chuanchuen - Program Adviser

Associate Professor

Department of Veterinary Public Health

Faculty of Veterinary Science,

Chulalongkorn University

Dr. Hope Rovira - Thesis Adviser

Associate Professor

Department of Paraclinical Sciences

College of Veterinary Medicine,

University of the Philippines

2

1• Background

2• Conceptual Framework

3• Materials and methods

2

OUTLINE

4• Results

5• Plan of Study

6 • Budget

7 • Advantages of the Study

8• References

Laguna, Philippines

3

https://www.google.co.th/search?q=laguna,+philippines+image

Fig 1. Philippine map showing Southern Tagalog region

Introduction (1)

Introduction (2)

Klebsiella pneumoniae

- facultative anaerobic G(-) bacteria

- source: environment; mucosal surfaces of humans & animals

Family: Enterobacteriaceae

Genus: Klebsiella

Blood agar: gray-brown 3-5mm diameter colonies; fecal odor;

non-hemolytic

McConkey agar: small to large (1-7mm) wet, glistening, dome-shaped

pink-yellow mucoid colonies,

w/ smooth edges,

w/o precipitate in the surrounding agar

4

(Zadoks , et al.,2011)

(Hogan and Smith, 2003)

(Munoz, MA., et al..,2006)

(Macrae, et al., 2001)

(Holt , et al., 1994)

https://www.google.co.th/search?q=klebsiella+pneumoniae+milk+image

Fig 2. Klebsiella pneumoniae

Introduction (3)

Test Result Test Result

Gram stain (-) Gelatin hydrolysis (-)

Oxidase (-) TSI A/A, (-) gas

Indole production (-) Malonate utilization (+)

Methyl red (-) D-glucose, acid & gas production (+)

Voges- Proskauer (+) Tartrate, Jordans (+)

Citrate (Simmons) (+) Esculin hydrolysis (+)

H2S production (-) Acetate utilization (+)

Urea hydrolysis (+) Nitrate reduction (+)

Phenylalaline deaminsae (-) Lipase (-)

Lysine decarboxylase (+) Pigment (-)

Arginine dihyrolase (-) Flagella arrangement (-)

Ornithine decarboxylase (-) Catalase production (+)

Motility (-) Oxidation-fermentation F

5

(Holt , JG., et al., 1994)

Table 1. Phenotypic characterization of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Introduction (4)

Research problem and its significance

Klebsiella pneumoniae

most common Klebsiella species infecting animals & causing mastitis further

imposing a higher economic loss in terms of milk production & survival.

Infections have developed multi-drug resistance (MDR) otherwise known as

multiple antibiotic resistant Klebsiella spp. (MRKs) due to production of

‘extended-spectrum’ β-lactamases (ESBLs).

6

(Munoz, MA., et al.. 2006)

(Macrae, et al., 2001)

Hypothesis:

Klebsiella pneumoniae in bovine mastitic milk is

zoonotic & has developed multiple antimicrobial

resistant properties against human & animal

antibiotics.

Introduction (5)

Objectives of the study

The study aims to understand the antimicrobialresistance & genetic relatedness of Klebsiella pneumoniaebetween human & bovine milk isolates.

Specific Objectives

1. To establish the prevalence of Klebsiella pneumoniae inrelation to season in mastitic and bulk tank milk in a dairyfarm in Laguna,

2. To determine the antibiotic resistance patterns of K.pneumoniae & characterize its mechanisms, distribution &transfer among Klebsiella sp. isolated from humans & milk.

7

Literature Review (1)

# Antibiotic Humans Antibiotic Bovine milk

1 Ampicillin X Penicillin/Cloxacillin X

2 Ceftazidime/Ceftiofur X Ceftiofur X

3 Imipenem X

4 Aztreonam X

5 Gentamicin X Gentamicin X

6 Tetracycline X Tetracycline X

7 Trimethoprim/

Sulfonamide

X Trimethpprim/

Sulfonamide

X

8 Ciprofloxacin X Enrofloxacin X

8

Table 2. Comparison of antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae

between clinical and bovine milk isolates.

(Mena, et al., 2006) (Macrae, et al., 2001)

(CLSI, 2012) (Brissea & Duijkerenb, 2005)

Literature Review (2)

9

(Timofte, D., et al.. 2013)

Fig 3. Schematic diagrams of environments around blaCTX-M-15 in common human isolates

(a to c) and bovine mastitis isolate (d) in United Kingdom.

UPLB

CU

Dr. HR

Dr. RC

Information & dissemination of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance & genetic relatedness of clinical & bovine milk K. pneumoniaeisolates

Technologytransfer

Implementationand systems/policymanagement onmastitis & prudentantibiotic use

Outputs

Researchassistantship &

Scientific writingprograms

Procurement &laboratory set up

Bacterialisolation,

MIC, PCR &Conjugationstudies

Thesis drafting

Process

Competent lab &research writingskills

Adequatefunding & labequipment

Feasible &effective labmethods

Adequatesupervisoryassistance

Inputs

Conceptual Framework

10

HMI

DOST

PCAARD

HMI

NDA, BAI

DA, DOH

Materials & Methods

MIC.pptx

11

Workers’ rectal swab

• Clinical

• Subclinical

Mastiticmilk

Bulk tank milk

Bacterial isolation• Ciprofloxacin

• Ampicillin

• ImepenemHumans

• Cloxacillin

• Ceftiofur

• Gentamicin

• Tetracycline

• Enrofloxacin

AnimalsAntibiotic

Susceptibility

testing

Molecular characterization

Class 1 integron & transferability

AMR mechanicams

ESBLs

characterization

Virulence genes

characterization

n= 184/season (368 samples)

7% prevalence rate w/ 95% CI

n= 50/season (100 samples)

17% prevalence rate w/ 95% CI

Genetic

relatedness

(CLSI, 2012)

(CLSI, 2008)

n = 30/season (60 samples)

63% prevalence rate w/ 95% CI

n= 12/season (24 samples)

38% prevalence rate w/ 95% CI

Results

• Table 3. List of bacteria isolated from mastitic animals in a dairy

farm in Laguna.

Results ID Table 1.xlsx

• Figure 4. Graph showing antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella

pneumoniae isolates.

• Table 5. List of antimicrobial resistance genes in Klebsiella

pneumoniae isolates.

Results AMR genes Table 3.xlsx

• Figure 5. Graph showing virulence genes of Klebsiella pneumoniae

isolates.

12

Study plan

Time and place of the study

• Time: January 2014 to June 2015

Gantt chart.docx

• Location:

Department of Para-clinical Sciences,

College of Veterinary Medicine,

University of the Philippines Los Banos, Laguna, &

Commercial dairy cattle farm in Laguna

13

Budget

Expenses Amount (Baht)

Scientific activities 187,000

Documentation 13,000

Miscellaneous 5,000

TOTAL 205,000

14

Advantages of this Study

• Data such as antimicrobial resistance genes of

Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from milk &

humans will be made available.

• This study will provide vital information to

various industry players, academicians, drug

companies & policy makers.

• As a pioneering work, it will serve as a

benchmark for further researches.

15

Literature Cited• Hogan, J. and Smith, KL. Coliform mastitis. Vet. Res. 34 (2003) 507–519.

• Munoz, MA., Ahlstrom C., Rauch, BJ., and Zadoks, RN. Fecal Shedding of Klebsiella pneumoniaeby Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci. 89 (2006):3425–3430.

• Zadoks , RN., Griffiths , HM., Munoz , MA., Ahlstrom , C., Bennett ,GJ., Thomas , E., andSchukken, YH. Sources of Klebsiella and Raoultella species on dairy farms: Be careful where youwalk. J. Dairy Sci. 94 (2011) :1045–1051.

• Holt, JG., Krieg NR., Sneath, PHA., Staley, JT., and Williams, ST. Bergey’s Manual ofDeterminative Bacteriology. 9th edition. 1994. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Maryland, USA.p.211.

• Timofte, D., Maciuca, IE., Evans, NJ., Williams, H., Wattret, A., Fick, JC., and Williams, NJ.Detection and Molecular Characterization of Escherichia coli CTX-M-15 and Klebsiellapneumoniae SHV-12 b-Lactamases from Bovine Mastitis Isolates in the United Kingdom.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58(2):789.

• Mena, A., Plasencia, V., Garci, L., Hidalgo, O., Ayestara, JI., Alberti, S., Borrell, N., Perez, JL.,and Oliver, A. Characterization of a Large Outbreak by CTX-M-1-Producing Klebsiellapneumoniae and Mechanisms Leading to In Vivo Carbapenem Resistance Development. Journalof CLINICAL Microbiology, Aug. 2006, p. 2831–2837 Vol. 44, No. 8.

• Macrae, MB., Shannon, KP., Rayner, DM., Kaisery, AM., Hoffmanz, PN and French, GL. Asimultaneous outbreak on a neonatal unit of two strains of multiply antibiotic resistant Klebsiellapneumoniae controllable only by ward closure. Journal of Hospital Infection (2001) 49: 183±192.

16

Thank you!!!

17

Kyeizu tin ba de!!!

Introduction (4)Molecular characterization

18

gyrAparC

E.coli E.coli

Figure 2. Phylogenetic clusters in Klebsiella pneumoniae in clinical isolates.

(Brisse and Verhoef , 2001)

Materials & Methods

MIC.pptx

19

Workers’ rectal swab

• Clinical

• Subclinical

Mastiticmilk

Bulk tank milk

Bacterial isolation• Ciprofloxacin

• Ampicillin

• ImepenemHumans

• Cloxacillin

• Ceftiofur

• Gentamicin

• Tetracycline

• Enrofloxacin

AnimalsAntibiotic

Susceptibility

testing

Molecular characterization

Class 1 integron & transferability

AMR mechanicams

ESBLs

characterization

Virulence genes

characterization

August –November 2014n= 184/season (368 samples)

7% prevalence rate w/ 95% CI

n= 50/season (100 samples)

17% prevalence rate w/ 95% CI

Genetic

relatedness

(CLSI, 2012)

(CLSI, 2008)

Cow handling:

• RA 8485 “The Animal Welfare Act of 1998”

• Good Agricultural and Husbandry Practices (GAHP) set by

the Bureau of Agriculture and Fisheries Product Standards

(BAFPS).

n = 30/season (60 samples)

63% prevalence rate w/ 95% CI

n= 12/season (24 samples)

38% prevalence rate w/ 95% CI


Recommended