of 31
8/6/2019 km_europe
1/31
1Royal Dutch / Shell Group of Companies
Shell Exploration and ProductionGlobal Networks
Andy [email protected]
8/6/2019 km_europe
2/31
2Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Shell Group E&P interests (as at December 31st 2000)
Production (incl. development)Exploration
Shelloperated
Shell
non-operated
8/6/2019 km_europe
3/31
3Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Shell Group upstream summary, 2000
34 producing, 3 developing and 18 exploration only ventures
9,751 million bbl oil/NGL proved reserves56,283 bln scf gas proved reserves600 mln bbls proved oil sand reserves
2,274 thousand b/d equity oil production8,212 million scf/d equity natural gas production available forsale
Profit $9,880 million
Capital investment of $5.0 billion
8/6/2019 km_europe
4/31
4Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Service Companies organisation
RenewablesDownstreamGas & Power
ChemicalsOil ProductsExploration& Production
Customers
ProfessionalServicesUnits(PSUs)
Corporate Centre
Research&TechnicalServices
Research&TechnicalServices
Research&TechnicalServices
B U S I N E S S U N I T SB U S I N E S S U N I T S
ExecutiveCommittee
ExecutiveCommittee
ExecutiveCommittee
ExecutiveCommittee
ExecutiveCommittee
ExecutiveCommittee
OperatingUnit
CMD
8/6/2019 km_europe
5/31 5Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Global EP human resources distribution
EP total global workforce 30202
International technical 3453professionals
International staff moves 1000per year
Multi-cultural (nationalities)
8/6/2019 km_europe
6/31 6Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
SSISIDS
RTS BTCCoE
OUOU
OU
OU
OUOUOU
OUSDDS
OUOU
OU
OU
OU OUOU
OU
CoE
SIDSSDDSRTS
SSI
Centr
al i
sed
Glo
balC
o-oper
ation
CoE
1995 1998 2001
Towards EP Global Co-operation
8/6/2019 km_europe
7/317Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Thinkglobally,
actlocally
New Ways of Working
Global Networks GlobalConsultants
DistributedTeams
Centres ofExcellence
Internal resources
New Ways of Working
8/6/2019 km_europe
8/318Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Terminology
Distributed ProjectTeams - DTW
(teamworking)
Are groups of people
with a common goal,interdependent work,and jointaccountability ofresults.
Communities ofPractice - CoP
(sharing)
Are groups of people
who share information,insight and advice abouta common interest orpractice
8/6/2019 km_europe
9/319Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Global Networksalso called Common Interest Networks - CINs,
Communities of Practice - CoPs
Working smarter instead of harder
Working together for maximum benefits
Achieving breakthrough performance through peoplesharing and applying talents, learning's and resourcesglobally
8/6/2019 km_europe
10/31
10Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Concept of a Global Network (CoP)
Discussion Group,High traffic area
Knowledge BaseWhat informationdo we already have ?
What do othersknow ?
The answer isnew Information
Add thenew Information
Start withinserting yourcurrent Information
Coordinator &Subject Focal points
8/6/2019 km_europe
11/31
11Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Lotus Notes Email EDMS SiteScape LiveLink MS Exchange
Tools?
8/6/2019 km_europe
12/31
12Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Key ingredients in CoP kick-off
Some 15 very enthusiastic 1st members Value for the participants and for the business Content, satisfying first time visitors Subject Focal Point or Global Coordinator
community builder, energiser, ambassador,chaser
Facilitator, experienced in kicking-off newnetworks
Technology, preferably hook in to existingcommunity
Money, as it does not come free of charge
8/6/2019 km_europe
13/31
13Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Typical Growth Profile
Prepare Initiate Incubate Expand Renew Mature, let go
Richard McDermotRichard McDermot
8/6/2019 km_europe
14/31
14Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
The key to success
Works:
Start small, with a seed Keep it simple Natural communities Members identify business
benefits of theirnetwork Members recognise there is
something in it for themselves Energiser bunny
To be avoided:
Complicated things,Academic approaches Knowledge
management Do It Yourself approaches,
Just give me the technology Force. (depends on culture) Top expert as moderator Implement via a Consultancy Firm (let
them guide you how to do it) A database of best practices
8/6/2019 km_europe
15/31
15Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
People not websites!
A focus on makingthe IT technologyavailable limits
the chancesof success to 20%.
8/6/2019 km_europe
16/31
16Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Development of a Global Network
1998 1999 2000
No.ofmembers
Time
8/6/2019 km_europe
17/31
17Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Sub-surface GNSurface GNWells GN
Procure-
ment(PGN)
Bench-
marking(BGN)
Major
Projects(VPR)
Commercial(ECN)
Portfolio of Global Networks
3800+ members
Per day:
350 logins
80 new entries
350 files viewed
4 new users
3400+ members
Per day:
160 logins
50 new entries
180 files viewed
3 new users
- Competitive Intelligence- Knowledge eBusiness
8/6/2019 km_europe
18/31
18Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
The organisational structure
Hub Coordinators (1 per OU)
Global Coordinator (1)
Subject Area Focal Points(1 per subject area)
Doers / Userswithin each OU and subjectarea (according to theirinterests and needs)
Gl b l N k i i l l
8/6/2019 km_europe
19/31
19Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Global Networks activity levels Q1 - 2001
0
200
400
Activity
Total/
day
Surface GN 50 184
Subsurface KS 78 357
Wells GN 85 268
Cross Business GN 28 147
Creations per day Views per day
Global Networks Activity levels
8/6/2019 km_europe
20/31
20Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Total Members and Active Members Q1 - 2001
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
Global Network
Total
Total Members 3,151 3,137 1,779 3,046
Active Users 1,250 1,888 1,163 2,150
Surface GN Subsurface KS Wells GN Cross Business GN
Global Networks membership
C t ib ti i Gl b l N t k
8/6/2019 km_europe
21/31
21Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Contributions in Global Networks
Global Network usage Oct'
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
39 40 41 42 43 44
Week N
Nonetwo
rk
queries/responses
Wells
Surfa
Subsu
Value
RealisProcu
KnowSharinBench
Comm
CompIntelli
10.000+ users; 30% in (growing)cross-business networks
Th i l t ti
8/6/2019 km_europe
22/31
22Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
The implementation Doers will
collaborateprincipally in
this area. All new items
will be placedhere.
All items will
have a shelflife in thisfolder.
Items will bemigrated tostructured
portion of site.
Remainder ofsite maintainedby Subjectmatter FocalPoints (SFPs) and
NetworkFacilitator.
Doers can replyto (or commenton) any items in
the formalstructure.
8/6/2019 km_europe
23/31
23Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
An example from the Wells community
Wh p pl j i
8/6/2019 km_europe
24/31
24Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Why people join
Priority
Post QuestionsContribute AnswersPassive UserLearning medium
New Technology
1 (top)
I
IIIIIIIIIIII
2
IIII
III
IIIIIII
3
IIIIIIIIIII
II
4
IIIIIII
II
5 (low)
IIIIIIIII
IIII
II
Time invested hours / week Return on time invested
< 0.5 0.5 - 1.0 1.0 - 2.0 > 2.0 Good Neutral Poor
II IIIII IIII II IIIII IIIII I
8/6/2019 km_europe
25/31
25Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Benefits and usage
Magnitude: 1 common (ish) model 11 networks 200+ entries/day 1,000+ logins/day
10,000 users Business benefits at least
200 MM$/annum(based on a value reviewcompleted in 2000)
Why people do it: > 70%: good investment 30-70%: good return on
own time investment 30-70%: exposure to new
technology 20-40%: Learning medium 10-30%: raise questions
How people do it: 50% spend
8/6/2019 km_europe
26/31
26Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Knowledge Bases We manage our high level technical know how in Standards, this has worked
for years in Shell (since the 30s) We have spent millions building databases of detailed technical documents:
No body searched them
They were quickly out of date No structure which document do I take as the best It is massively expensive to implement and maintain
With our complex business the taxonomy is too difficult to get right Example of 15% (and dropping) benefit analysis
We have now abandoned this and now focus on eLearning packages to deliverbase competencies, Global Networks to be the corporate memory andStandards as being the massed high level knowledge, we drive best practicethrough focused delivery teams
8/6/2019 km_europe
27/31
27Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
What we mean by Knowledge Bases
Standards/procedures/Policies
Discussions withpeers/colleagues
Best PracticesGood Practices
Common (to a few) procedures
KnowledgeBase
EP History
8/6/2019 km_europe
28/31
28Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
EP HistoryPre computers
ExPats and standards carried knowledge - very successful we still do itmassively today
1997
Development of initial concepts 1998
Implementation: 106 small CoPs of 20-300 members Increasing proliferation and overlaps = confusion
1999 The major leap forward:
Harmonisation of the 106 CoPs into 3 Global Networks 2000
4.5 MM$ central funding(1/3 spent centrally, 2/3 spent in individual Global Networks)
Networking imbedded in normal way of working (included in formal processes) 70% of professional staff join a network, Portfolio extended outside the core disciplines
Peer Review via the Global Networks (i.e. Short project work in GlobalNetwork)
Cross Business Networks were launched 2001
5.5 MM$ central funding.....
With hindsight
8/6/2019 km_europe
29/31
29Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
With hindsight
Build larger communities by gluing smaller ones together, not by initiating
them as such. This goes against current Consultant Advise who promotesmall trusting communities who know or get to know each other , this wefeel in Shell created too many silos
In building the smaller ones, keep the larger picture in the back of yourmind, move the smaller into the larger ones ASAP
Larger communities need a more detailed organisational structure withenergizers and they have the critical mass to implement this. Do it yourself, you know your business, you know how your people work,
consultancies do not. Have one single place where the community members look for new items
and have a prompting system so they can keep in touch without logging in Databases of Documents do not have credibility in Upstream Shell
8/6/2019 km_europe
30/31
30Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000
Invitation
We continually are looking for people who have similarcommunities to share good practices with. We have learneda lot from the likes of Siemens, VW, World Bank, BuckmanLabs and we would like to think they have learned a littlefrom us
Please contact us:[email protected] or [email protected]
8/6/2019 km_europe
31/31
31Royal Dutch / Shell Group of Companies
End of Presentation
Demo of one of our Global Networks