+ All Categories
Home > Documents > km_europe

km_europe

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: riyarocks
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 31

Transcript
  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    1/31

    1Royal Dutch / Shell Group of Companies

    Shell Exploration and ProductionGlobal Networks

    Andy [email protected]

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    2/31

    2Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Shell Group E&P interests (as at December 31st 2000)

    Production (incl. development)Exploration

    Shelloperated

    Shell

    non-operated

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    3/31

    3Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Shell Group upstream summary, 2000

    34 producing, 3 developing and 18 exploration only ventures

    9,751 million bbl oil/NGL proved reserves56,283 bln scf gas proved reserves600 mln bbls proved oil sand reserves

    2,274 thousand b/d equity oil production8,212 million scf/d equity natural gas production available forsale

    Profit $9,880 million

    Capital investment of $5.0 billion

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    4/31

    4Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Service Companies organisation

    RenewablesDownstreamGas & Power

    ChemicalsOil ProductsExploration& Production

    Customers

    ProfessionalServicesUnits(PSUs)

    Corporate Centre

    Research&TechnicalServices

    Research&TechnicalServices

    Research&TechnicalServices

    B U S I N E S S U N I T SB U S I N E S S U N I T S

    ExecutiveCommittee

    ExecutiveCommittee

    ExecutiveCommittee

    ExecutiveCommittee

    ExecutiveCommittee

    ExecutiveCommittee

    OperatingUnit

    CMD

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    5/31 5Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Global EP human resources distribution

    EP total global workforce 30202

    International technical 3453professionals

    International staff moves 1000per year

    Multi-cultural (nationalities)

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    6/31 6Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    SSISIDS

    RTS BTCCoE

    OUOU

    OU

    OU

    OUOUOU

    OUSDDS

    OUOU

    OU

    OU

    OU OUOU

    OU

    CoE

    SIDSSDDSRTS

    SSI

    Centr

    al i

    sed

    Glo

    balC

    o-oper

    ation

    CoE

    1995 1998 2001

    Towards EP Global Co-operation

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    7/317Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Thinkglobally,

    actlocally

    New Ways of Working

    Global Networks GlobalConsultants

    DistributedTeams

    Centres ofExcellence

    Internal resources

    New Ways of Working

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    8/318Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Terminology

    Distributed ProjectTeams - DTW

    (teamworking)

    Are groups of people

    with a common goal,interdependent work,and jointaccountability ofresults.

    Communities ofPractice - CoP

    (sharing)

    Are groups of people

    who share information,insight and advice abouta common interest orpractice

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    9/319Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Global Networksalso called Common Interest Networks - CINs,

    Communities of Practice - CoPs

    Working smarter instead of harder

    Working together for maximum benefits

    Achieving breakthrough performance through peoplesharing and applying talents, learning's and resourcesglobally

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    10/31

    10Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Concept of a Global Network (CoP)

    Discussion Group,High traffic area

    Knowledge BaseWhat informationdo we already have ?

    What do othersknow ?

    The answer isnew Information

    Add thenew Information

    Start withinserting yourcurrent Information

    Coordinator &Subject Focal points

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    11/31

    11Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Lotus Notes Email EDMS SiteScape LiveLink MS Exchange

    Tools?

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    12/31

    12Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Key ingredients in CoP kick-off

    Some 15 very enthusiastic 1st members Value for the participants and for the business Content, satisfying first time visitors Subject Focal Point or Global Coordinator

    community builder, energiser, ambassador,chaser

    Facilitator, experienced in kicking-off newnetworks

    Technology, preferably hook in to existingcommunity

    Money, as it does not come free of charge

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    13/31

    13Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Typical Growth Profile

    Prepare Initiate Incubate Expand Renew Mature, let go

    Richard McDermotRichard McDermot

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    14/31

    14Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    The key to success

    Works:

    Start small, with a seed Keep it simple Natural communities Members identify business

    benefits of theirnetwork Members recognise there is

    something in it for themselves Energiser bunny

    To be avoided:

    Complicated things,Academic approaches Knowledge

    management Do It Yourself approaches,

    Just give me the technology Force. (depends on culture) Top expert as moderator Implement via a Consultancy Firm (let

    them guide you how to do it) A database of best practices

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    15/31

    15Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    People not websites!

    A focus on makingthe IT technologyavailable limits

    the chancesof success to 20%.

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    16/31

    16Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Development of a Global Network

    1998 1999 2000

    No.ofmembers

    Time

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    17/31

    17Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Sub-surface GNSurface GNWells GN

    Procure-

    ment(PGN)

    Bench-

    marking(BGN)

    Major

    Projects(VPR)

    Commercial(ECN)

    Portfolio of Global Networks

    3800+ members

    Per day:

    350 logins

    80 new entries

    350 files viewed

    4 new users

    3400+ members

    Per day:

    160 logins

    50 new entries

    180 files viewed

    3 new users

    - Competitive Intelligence- Knowledge eBusiness

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    18/31

    18Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    The organisational structure

    Hub Coordinators (1 per OU)

    Global Coordinator (1)

    Subject Area Focal Points(1 per subject area)

    Doers / Userswithin each OU and subjectarea (according to theirinterests and needs)

    Gl b l N k i i l l

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    19/31

    19Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Global Networks activity levels Q1 - 2001

    0

    200

    400

    Activity

    Total/

    day

    Surface GN 50 184

    Subsurface KS 78 357

    Wells GN 85 268

    Cross Business GN 28 147

    Creations per day Views per day

    Global Networks Activity levels

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    20/31

    20Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Total Members and Active Members Q1 - 2001

    0

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    Global Network

    Total

    Total Members 3,151 3,137 1,779 3,046

    Active Users 1,250 1,888 1,163 2,150

    Surface GN Subsurface KS Wells GN Cross Business GN

    Global Networks membership

    C t ib ti i Gl b l N t k

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    21/31

    21Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Contributions in Global Networks

    Global Network usage Oct'

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    39 40 41 42 43 44

    Week N

    Nonetwo

    rk

    queries/responses

    Wells

    Surfa

    Subsu

    Value

    RealisProcu

    KnowSharinBench

    Comm

    CompIntelli

    10.000+ users; 30% in (growing)cross-business networks

    Th i l t ti

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    22/31

    22Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    The implementation Doers will

    collaborateprincipally in

    this area. All new items

    will be placedhere.

    All items will

    have a shelflife in thisfolder.

    Items will bemigrated tostructured

    portion of site.

    Remainder ofsite maintainedby Subjectmatter FocalPoints (SFPs) and

    NetworkFacilitator.

    Doers can replyto (or commenton) any items in

    the formalstructure.

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    23/31

    23Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    An example from the Wells community

    Wh p pl j i

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    24/31

    24Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Why people join

    Priority

    Post QuestionsContribute AnswersPassive UserLearning medium

    New Technology

    1 (top)

    I

    IIIIIIIIIIII

    2

    IIII

    III

    IIIIIII

    3

    IIIIIIIIIII

    II

    4

    IIIIIII

    II

    5 (low)

    IIIIIIIII

    IIII

    II

    Time invested hours / week Return on time invested

    < 0.5 0.5 - 1.0 1.0 - 2.0 > 2.0 Good Neutral Poor

    II IIIII IIII II IIIII IIIII I

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    25/31

    25Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Benefits and usage

    Magnitude: 1 common (ish) model 11 networks 200+ entries/day 1,000+ logins/day

    10,000 users Business benefits at least

    200 MM$/annum(based on a value reviewcompleted in 2000)

    Why people do it: > 70%: good investment 30-70%: good return on

    own time investment 30-70%: exposure to new

    technology 20-40%: Learning medium 10-30%: raise questions

    How people do it: 50% spend

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    26/31

    26Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Knowledge Bases We manage our high level technical know how in Standards, this has worked

    for years in Shell (since the 30s) We have spent millions building databases of detailed technical documents:

    No body searched them

    They were quickly out of date No structure which document do I take as the best It is massively expensive to implement and maintain

    With our complex business the taxonomy is too difficult to get right Example of 15% (and dropping) benefit analysis

    We have now abandoned this and now focus on eLearning packages to deliverbase competencies, Global Networks to be the corporate memory andStandards as being the massed high level knowledge, we drive best practicethrough focused delivery teams

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    27/31

    27Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    What we mean by Knowledge Bases

    Standards/procedures/Policies

    Discussions withpeers/colleagues

    Best PracticesGood Practices

    Common (to a few) procedures

    KnowledgeBase

    EP History

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    28/31

    28Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    EP HistoryPre computers

    ExPats and standards carried knowledge - very successful we still do itmassively today

    1997

    Development of initial concepts 1998

    Implementation: 106 small CoPs of 20-300 members Increasing proliferation and overlaps = confusion

    1999 The major leap forward:

    Harmonisation of the 106 CoPs into 3 Global Networks 2000

    4.5 MM$ central funding(1/3 spent centrally, 2/3 spent in individual Global Networks)

    Networking imbedded in normal way of working (included in formal processes) 70% of professional staff join a network, Portfolio extended outside the core disciplines

    Peer Review via the Global Networks (i.e. Short project work in GlobalNetwork)

    Cross Business Networks were launched 2001

    5.5 MM$ central funding.....

    With hindsight

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    29/31

    29Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    With hindsight

    Build larger communities by gluing smaller ones together, not by initiating

    them as such. This goes against current Consultant Advise who promotesmall trusting communities who know or get to know each other , this wefeel in Shell created too many silos

    In building the smaller ones, keep the larger picture in the back of yourmind, move the smaller into the larger ones ASAP

    Larger communities need a more detailed organisational structure withenergizers and they have the critical mass to implement this. Do it yourself, you know your business, you know how your people work,

    consultancies do not. Have one single place where the community members look for new items

    and have a prompting system so they can keep in touch without logging in Databases of Documents do not have credibility in Upstream Shell

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    30/31

    30Copyright SIEP B.V. and SIEP Inc., Dec. 2000

    Invitation

    We continually are looking for people who have similarcommunities to share good practices with. We have learneda lot from the likes of Siemens, VW, World Bank, BuckmanLabs and we would like to think they have learned a littlefrom us

    Please contact us:[email protected] or [email protected]

  • 8/6/2019 km_europe

    31/31

    31Royal Dutch / Shell Group of Companies

    End of Presentation

    Demo of one of our Global Networks