Date post: | 27-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | willis-watson |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
What is it? Agroterrorism involves the act
of any person knowingly or maliciously using biological agents as weapons against the agricultural industry and the food supply.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Crop ProblemsLate blight of potatoRice blastBrown spot of riceRubber leaf blightSouthern blightWheat rusts.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Possibility or Probability:
The critical issue with agroterrorism is the low level of technical knowledge required to use it.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Possibility or Probability: Before Sept. 11 -- the
federal government allocated almost $40 million to the USDA for agroterrorism.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Indiana Law recognizes agroterrorism as
A crime – Class C Felony A weapon of mass destruction
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Pennsylvania LawMandates payment to the owner of the afflicted animal for:– Value of the animal– Disposal– Testing of the diseased animals– Cost of clean up, including soil testing– Lost value of production
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Costs?
Foot and Mouth -- $2 billion to $24 billion. The problem is that this is based on a natural outbreak. A terrorist would aim for maximum damage.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Costs? Dioxin contaminated animal
feed in Belgium -- $ 1 billion in damages and trade sanctions. If it had been in the US, $140 billion.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Costs? Leaf blight caused $1 billion
in crop damages. But if something like it had halted US crop exports, it could cost $100 billion.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Experts agree The cost in terms of
damages is directly proportional to the time it takes to diagnose the problem.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Proof?
It has rarely been proven that terrorism has been used against agricultural targets.
But let’s look at history…
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
History of agroterrorism
WWI – Germany spread glanders disease on mules and horses destined for Europe.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
History of agroterrorismWWII
– Canada, Great Britain, Japan, the United States, and the USSR had offensive programs.
– Germany had no offensive program.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
History of agroterrorism
Japan is alleged to have used animal and plant pathogens, including rinderpest and anthrax, against Russia and Mongolia in 1940s.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
History of agroterrorism
The U.S. scrubbed its biological weapons program in 1969. But, it continued defensive research.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
History of agroterrorism In 1972, the US, Soviet
Union, Great Britain, and Canada agreed to the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC).
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
History of agroterrorism Soviet BW program grew
during the 1970s and 1980s to include more than 30,000 scientists and workers, as well as seven production and two storage facilities.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
History of agroterrorism Iraq is also known to have
developed a BW potential recently, including anti-personnel, animal and crop agents.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
History of agroterrorism Since 1915, there have been
19 acts of agroterrorism around the world, five of which have taken place in the U.S. Source:http://cns.miis.edu/ Center for Nonproliferation Studies
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Five cases in the US:1915-1917 Military animals1970 Ashville, Alabama1989 Southern California1996 Florida1996 Berlin, Wisconsin
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Conducted by the US:1950 East Germany1952 Korea1962-1970 Vietnam1962-1997 Cuba
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Farm Level Biosecurity education
- farmers - crop and livestock
diagnosticians.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
National LevelDisease eradicationCompensation costsRestore public confidence
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Counterattack: Cooperation and
consolidation of efforts between all agencies and organizations involved.
Purdue Extension
Knowledge to Go
Sources: Anne Kohnen “Responding to the Threat of
Agroterrorism: Specific recommendations for the United States Department of Agriculture.”
May 2001 issue of Purdue Agricultural Economics Report (PAER).
Center For Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies