Date post: | 02-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jean-caldwell |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
KnowledgeWebOutreach to Industry
KnowledgeWeb O2I Plenary Report
Heraklion, 14 May 2004
Industrial Applications and PromotionKnowledge Web
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 2
Knowledge Web
O2I Tasks dependencies
Application Needs• Prototypical Use Cases• Knowledge processes• Knowledge components
Evaluation of Technology
• Utility of Ontology tools• Interoperability of tools• Ontology content
Recommandations to deploy• Best Practices• Ontology repository• OntoMetadata standards• Onto outreach authority
Task 1
Ind
us
try
Bo
ard
Task 2 Task 3
Cross-Network cooperation – partners, joint education, program activities Task 5
Portal - Ontologies, first prototype, maintenance KW and SWSATask 6
Promotion – Technology RoadMaps, Success stories, Technology show casesTask 4
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 3
Knowledge Web
WP1.1 Industrial application needs
(Started, FT)
WP1.2 Evaluation for technology selection
(Start in 6, VUB)
WP1.3 Technology recommendations
(Started, VUB)
WP1.4 Promotion of ontology technologies
(Start in 6, UIBk)
WP1.5 Cross-network cooperation
(Started, UIBK)
WP1.6 Semantic portal infrastructure
(Started, UPM)
O2I PlanNº Nom de la tâche
1 WP1.1: Industrial Needs Analysis
2 Industry Board Set up (Task 1.1)
3 Board and MoU (D 1.1.1 v1)
4 Board updated (D 1.1.1 v2)
5 Systems Requirements (Task 1.1.2)
6 Prototypical Use Cases (D 1.1.2 v1)
7 Knowledge processing Requirements (Task 1.1.3)
8 Ontology based processing (D 1.1.3 v1)
9 Knowledge System requirements for Business Cases (D1.1.4)
10 WP1.2: Evaluations for Technology Selection
11 Utility of Ontology based Tools (Task 1.2.1)
12 Utility of Ontology Tools suite (D 1.2.1 v1)
13 Interoperabilty of Tools (Task 1.2.2)
14 Report on SWF requirements (D 1.2.2)
15 Ontology Content Evaluation (Task 1.2.3)
16 Method for Ontology evaluation v1 (D 1.2.3)
17 WP1.3: Technology Recommendations
18 Best Practices and Guidelines (Task 1.3.1)
19 Best Practices v1 (D 1.3.1)
20 Ontology Repository (Task 1.3.2)
21 Standards (Task 1.3.3)
22 Standards report V1 (D 1.3.2)
23 Ontology Registration Authority (Task 1.3.4)
24 Report on OOA v1 (D 1.3.3)
25 WP1.4: Promotion of Technology
26 Technology Roadmap (Task 1. 4.1)
27 Roadmap v1 (D 1.4.1)
28 Success Stories (Task 1.4.2)
29 Success Stories v1 (D 1.4.2)
30 International Technology Show (Task 1.4.3)
31 Report on International Shows v1 (D 1.4.3)
32 WP1.5: Cross-field activity
33 Potential co-operators (Task 1.5.1)
34 Project presentation and show case (D 1.5.1)
35 Joint Education and Training co-operations (Task 1.5.2)
36 Joint Education and Training activities (D 1.5.2)
37 Co-operation KW - REWERSE Graduate education (DE-D2)
38 Co-operation KW-REWERSE Industrial competence (DT-D2)
39 WP1.6: Semantic Portal Infrastructure
40 Portal Requirements and Design (Task and D 1.6.1)
41 Portal Requirements (D 1.6.1)
42 Portal Ontology (D 1.6.2)
43 Portal Development (Task 1.6.3)
44 First Prototype Portal (D 1.6.3)
45 Content and maintenance activities (Task 1.6.4)
46 Portal Releases KnowledgeWeb and SWSA (D 1.6.4)
D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 4
Knowledge Web
O2I Progress towards the objectives
KnowledgeWeb O2I Plenary Report
Heraklio, 14 May 2004
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 5
Knowledge Web
Executive Summary (1) Heraklion Board of industrial partners (WP 1.1)
– Business sectorial domains (Automotive, bank, telecom, … ) In building– Pull-Push Technology balance (Pull search first) In building– Invitation letter and sent to potential Industry partners (DONE) – Starting and Sharing the F2F meeting (to get business scenarios) June 2004
– All O2I partners are strongly invited to contact potential Industry partners
Industrial Board MoU (WP 1.1)– Drafted and circulated by FT Done 16 April 2004
– Main structure of the Operational charter Agreed by EPMB– Final version to be sent end of May 2004 EPMB (for signature by Industry partners)
Systems Requirements (D 1.1.2)
– First draft initiated by FUB (April 2004)– Needs to organize selected ad-hoc F2F meetings with industry partners – F2F - Form for describing prototypical Use Cases UML style could be used (actors, sequences, classes)
– Intermediate version of Use Cases should be delivered Month 6 to KW-Research
Knowledge Processing needs (D 1.1.3)
– Univ of Trento is leading the task– First draft to start in June 2004
Benchmarking (WP 1.2)
– Clarify the needs in relation to industry needs– Set a network of close collaboration between Research and Industry
Next main focus !!
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 6
Knowledge Web
Executive Summary (2) Heraklion
Ontology Registration Authority (WP 1.3)– Set up the requirements for The ORA for the first KW phase (M18)– Leverage the effort with identify Standardization bodies– MetaData for Ontology repositories (UPM) Leveraging with W3C WG BPD
Best Practices : cooperation with W3C (WP 1.3)
– VUA, INRIA, UPM, FT are active members of WG Best Practices for Deployment Promotion (WP 1.4)
– Roadmap and technology show– ESWS'04 and SemWeb Challenge
Industrial Workshops / Conferences (WP 1.4)
– Knowledgeweb O2I meeting with Industry board (specific needs or PMB event)– Best promotional vectors (Advise from Industrial Board)– SIGIR’04, ISWC’04, OTM’04 …
Cooperation with NoE Rewerse (WP1.5)
– Technology transfer Started 5 May DONE (minutes circulated)
Portal O2I Web site (WP 1.6) – Strong request from UPM to populate and make suggestions for improvements– FT propose a look and feel for "business oriented" access to O2I related contents
It is your portal !!
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 7
Knowledge Web
Kno
wle
dge
Kno
wle
dge W
ebW
eb
http://…
realizing the semantic web
WP 1. Outreach to Industry
HomeHome Industrial PartnersIndustrial Partners ParticipantsParticipants EventsEvents DocumentsDocuments LinksLinks ContactsContacts
ObjectivesObjectives
NewsletterNewsletter
Enter your e-mail OKOK
Join usJoin us
Complete the form
The next generation of the Web (the Semantic WebSemantic Web) is a huge information space, where machines can easily participate and help in a more meaningful way. There is, however, still a long way to go transfer the Semantic Web from an academic adventure into a technology provided by software industry. Supporting this transition process of Ontology technology from Academia to Industry is the main and major goal of Knowledge Web, the Network of Excellence under European Commission 6th FP.
In particular, the Work Package Outreach to IndustryOutreach to Industry focuses its efforts on promoting greater awareness and faster take-up of Semantic Web technology by industry.
Your code OKOK
Industrial Private Industrial Private PartnersPartners
SECTORS BASED BUSINESS CASES SCENARIOSSECTORS BASED BUSINESS CASES SCENARIOS
Automobile Industry
Banking and finance
Computer and electronics
Consumer goods
Distribution
Energy, Public services
Food industry
Industry and construction
Internet
Luxury goods, fashion, beauty
Media and communications
Pharmaceuticals and health
Service industry
Sports
Telecommunications
Transport and logistics
O2I Proposal for the Web Site
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 8
Knowledge Web
WP 1.1 Applications needs
FT
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 9
Knowledge Web
1 – Industrial Board•Industrial sectors benefactors census•Categorization (using, be-using, would-benefit)•MoU signed
D1.1.1
2 – System Requirements•Prototypical Use Cases•Typology of Ontology processing•Knowledge Components Architecture
D1.1.2
3 – Industrial Board 2•Partners Consolidation•Business areas•Top Best Applications
D1.1.4
4 – Concrete transfert results•Solutions•Evaluations•Further directions
June 2004
January 2004
January 2005 June 2005
Knowledgeweb
The End
2nd Phase
June 2005
Main Task 1.1 Milestones
D1.1.3 D1.1.1 Rev1
36 months 48 months
We are here
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 10
Knowledge Web
Progress• Task 1: Establishment of an industrial Board (FT)
– Invitation letter and organizational charter (MoU) (DONE)– Organization in economical sectors and start populating (DONE)– D1.1.1 on schedule
• Task 2: System Requirements Analysis (FUB)– Prototypical Business Use Cases and migration needs– First draft of the skeleton of the prototypical Use Cases– One illustration– D 1.1.2 on schedule
• Task 3: Knowledge processing requirements analysis (UniTrento)– Knowledge processing needs and architectural components– Leadership decided : Uni Trento– D 1.1.3 will start next week– D 1.1.4 will follow
Nº Nom de la tâche
1 WP1.1: Industrial Needs Analysis
2 Industry Board Set up (Task 1.1)
3 Board and MoU (D 1.1.1 v1)
4 Board updated (D 1.1.1 v2)
5 Systems Requirements (Task 1.1.2)
6 Prototypical Use Cases (D 1.1.2 v1)
7 Knowledge processing Requirements (Task 1.1.3)
8 Ontology based processing (D 1.1.3 v1)
9 Knowledge System requirements for Business Cases (D1.1.4)
D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre
No difficulty
To report
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 11
Knowledge Web
The Industrial Board
Number of partnersContractual Targets
2004 : 50
2005 : 100
2006 : 150
2007 : 200
Mid-2004 : 15 - 50
We need to master the growth
of the network !
Check of their declaration of interest
It should be a win-win cooperation
Rules for the building
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 12
Knowledge Web
Industry Board MoU• Basic principles
– No interferences with current KW contract / Consortium Agreement (CA): just supplement to CA
• Knowledge Web Early Access Policy – The aim is to have a panel of industrial corporations, working as an informal group representative of
a “laboratorial” target market where all can study industrial requirements, test the industrial value of their ideas and collect inspiration for new research opportunities.
• Setting-up and Accession– Any third parties may apply. The terms and conditions "Knowledge Web Early Access Policy" and
the Application Form are to be available on-line. – Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (VUA) will be authorised to sign with the Acceding third party on behalf
of all contractors. Nonetheless, contractors have a two weeks term to express their opposition.
• Early Knowledge transfer– "Early Releases" ie. Results and deliverables from the KW technical committees, are to be made
available to Panellists at the respective owners' discretion; preferably in the form of executable code or such other forms as do not give immediate access to confidential Knowledge.
– Early Releases have to be treated as confidential by the Panellist, – The Panellists agree
- To test the Early Releases diligently and to communicate to the Contractors sufficient progress and error reports,- To provide inputs such as but not limited to, recommendations, or industrial requirements, feedback to the Contractors in relation to its own use of the Semantic Web services & technology,
• O2I managers responsibility– ensuring timely achievement of the Panellists' tasks,– ensuring and organizing feedback and information for the benefit of all Contractors.
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 13
Knowledge Web
Knowledge Processing Needs
Delivery of Use Cases and Knowledge
Process
D1.1.2 / D1.1.3
Delivery of Use Cases and Knowledge
Process
D1.1.2 / D1.1.3
Delivery of Board and
MOU
D1.1.1
Delivery of Board and
MOU
D1.1.1
WP 1.1 Plan
Jul Aug Sep Oct DecNovJan Feb
2004
KW 2
JuneMar Apr May
Kick-off
Industry partnership
Tasks to be sharedIndustry Board and F2FBusiness CasesPrototypical Use CaseKey Knowledge processesO2Indusdry web site
2005
Use Case
D1.1.2
Interim Version
Use Case
D1.1.2
Interim Version
Prototypical Use Cases
O2I ad-hoc
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 14
Knowledge Web
WP 1.2 Technology Evaluation
VUB
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 15
Knowledge Web
Progress
-This work package starts 1st of July-• Task 1: Utility of ontology-based tools (Uni Trento)
– A roadmap for achieving the goals of this task is established.– The main dependencies with other work packages are identified and discussed
(specially benchmarking in WP2.1 and WP2.2). – An ad hoc meeting on “benchmarking in Kweb” will be organized with the other
workpackages. • Task 2: Interoperability of tools (L3S)
– The general goals of this task were presented and discussed. – Identification of tool components and identification of requirements for interoperability is
expected in next meeting.• Task 3: Ontology content evaluation (UKARL)
– The general goals of this task were discussed. – Yet no consensus about what “ontology evaluation” means. – A clear description of methods for ontology evaluation is expected in next meeting. – Consensus should be reached - in an offline mode- before the next meeting.
Nº Nom de la tâche
10 WP1.2: Evaluations for Technology Selection
11 Utility of Ontology based Tools (Task 1.2.1)
12 Utility of Ontology Tools suite (D 1.2.1 v1)
13 Interoperabilty of Tools (Task 1.2.2)
14 Report on SWF requirements (D 1.2.2)
15 Ontology Content Evaluation (Task 1.2.3)
16 Method for Ontology evaluation v1 (D 1.2.3)
D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 16
Knowledge Web
WP 1.3 Technology Recommendations
VUB
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 17
Knowledge Web
Progress
• Task 1: Best Practices and Guidelines (FT) – A preliminary work and basic analyses of Best Practices. – A report is expected in the next meeting to capture the top best practices from the industry use cases – Ongoing work on best practices and guidelines for automatic metadata creation, with focus on industrial
business cases.– Ongoing work on Best practices and guidelines for ontology-based recruitment application as prototypical
business case.
• Task 2: Ontology Repository (UPM) & Task 3: Standards (UPM)– Identification of a subset of metadata for describing ontologies using the Reference Ontology. This set of
metadata will be proposed for standardization. – Adapting and extending the OntoRoadMap as the first prototype of ontology repository, this repository will be
part of the KWeb portal.
• Task 4: Ontology Outreach Authority (VUB)– Preliminary details on the goals and requirements of OOA. – A short report on the OOA goals and requirements will be presented in the next meeting and then it will be sent
to the industry board for feedback. – Expected-Problem: Person-month allocated to this task is very optimistic. Decision: the decision is to be taken
after finishing D1.3.3: reduce the goals or allocate more person-month.
Nº Nom de la tâche
17 WP1.3: Technology Recommendations
18 Best Practices and Guidelines (Task 1.3.1)
19 Best Practices v1 (D 1.3.1)
20 Ontology Repository (Task 1.3.2)
21 Standards (Task 1.3.3)
22 Standards report V1 (D 1.3.2)
23 Ontology Registration Authority (Task 1.3.4)
24 Report on OOA v1 (D 1.3.3)
D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 18
Knowledge Web
WP 1.4 Technology Promotion
FUB
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 19
Knowledge Web
Progress• Deliverable 1: Technology RoadMap (UIBK)
– Input from del. 3 the Report on International Semantic Technology Roadshow
• Deliverable 2: Success Stories (UIBK)– Suggestion to restrict to one Success story in order to strongly focus on
marketing elements as creative layout and industry appealing style.
• Deliverable 3: Report on International Technology Show (UIKB)– First International Semantic Technology Road Show: ESWS’04, successfully held May 12th, in Crete!!!– The collection of applications and tools will be organized in a categorization matrix – The focus will be on applications rather than tools (is more industry related and avoids overlap with other
activities)– The report will be related to the technology roadmap (D 1.4.1)
Additional identified needs and suggestions:1. Having links on the portal to the tools and applications
2. WIKI like portal for an application repository. Suggested features of such repository:
• user-driven, with a template for developers of the applications to complete. (Work out categorization matrix for the template)
• ranking system as in W3C WG BPD (See the JAVA portal (proposal from UPM))Nº Nom de la tâche
25 WP1.4: Promotion of Technology
26 Technology Roadmap (Task 1. 4.1)
27 Roadmap v1 (D 1.4.1)
28 Success Stories (Task 1.4.2)
29 Success Stories v1 (D 1.4.2)
30 International Technology Show (Task 1.4.3)
31 Report on International Shows v1 (D 1.4.3)
D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 20
Knowledge Web
WP 1.5 Cross-Network cooperation
UIBK
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 21
Knowledge Web
Progress
• Task 1: Potential cooperators (UIBK)– Should we just focus on our collaboration with Rewerse (the most closed NoE) or with any
other NoEs (such as: MUSCLE, Aim@Shape, KB2.0 and Agentlink III)
• Task 2: Joint Education and Training cooperations (UIBK)– DE-D2:
• Course collections (same platform for learning units)• MSc program (joint action with Rewerse) • Platform for education in industry• The KW portal will host e.Learning facilities similar to those pursued in RW education area
– DT-D2:• O2I joined the Technology transfer task of Rewerse (FT) (telecon each month planned)
• Joint collaboration on the industrial board composition and organization• KW and RW review the possible common concrete actions and right targets for promotion and
dissemination• Task 3: Programme of activities with each network (UIBK)
– Workshop organized by AceMedia http://www.acemedia.org/aceMedia/events/ewimt2004.html
• D 1.5.1 – Project presentation and showcase (DONE)
Nº Nom de la tâche
32 WP1.5: Cross-field activity
33 Potential co-operators (Task 1.5.1)
34 Project presentation and show case (D 1.5.1)
35 Joint Education and Training co-operations (Task 1.5.2)
36 Joint Education and Training activities (D 1.5.2)
37 Co-operation KW - REWERSE Graduate education (DE-D2)
38 Co-operation KW-REWERSE Industrial competence (DT-D2)
D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 22
Knowledge Web
WP 1.6KW Portal
UPM
©KnowledgeWeb – KnowledgeWeb O2I, Heraklio, 13-14 May 2004, Page 23
Knowledge Web
Progress
• Task 1: Portal Requirements and Design (UPM)– Semantic Portal infrastructure presented– Deliverables: Ontologies (M6), Portal requirements (M12), First prototype content delivery (M18)
• Task 2: Portal Development (UPM)– Technology used for : ODESeW– 5 ontologies for the time being (Time ontology will be added)– Migration of some contents from Ontoweb– Comments from the audience– Ease for upload and annotate the content instances (report, deliverable, presentation)– WIKI facility– Download facility
• Task 3: Content and maintenance activities (UPM)
Nº Nom de la tâche
39 WP1.6: Semantic Portal Infrastructure
40 Portal Requirements and Design (Task and D 1.6.1)
41 Portal Requirements (D 1.6.1)
42 Portal Ontology (D 1.6.2)
43 Portal Development (Task 1.6.3)
44 First Prototype Portal (D 1.6.3)
45 Content and maintenance activities (Task 1.6.4)
46 Portal Releases KnowledgeWeb and SWSA (D 1.6.4)
D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre 1er Semestre 2nd Semestre