KNOX CITY COUNCIL€¦ · Proposed Rezoning Of Council Property – 7 Church Street, Bayswater...

KNOX CITY COUNCIL MINUTES

Ordinary Meeting of Council

Held at the Civic Centre

511 Burwood Highway Wantirna South

On

Tuesday 25 February 2014

KNOX CITY COUNCIL

MINUTES FOR THE ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL HELD AT THE CIVIC CENTRE, 511 BURWOOD HIGHWAY, WANTIRNA SOUTH

ON TUESDAY 25 FEBRUARY 2014 AT 7.00PM

PRESENT:

Cr D Pearce (Mayor & Chairperson) Taylor Ward Cr P Lockwood Baird Ward Cr J Mortimore Chandler Ward Cr J Cossari Collier Ward Cr A Gill Dinsdale Ward Cr K Orpen Dobson Ward Cr T Holland Friberg Ward Cr D Pearce Taylor Ward Cr N Seymour Tirhatuan Ward Mr G Emonson Chief Executive Officer Dr I Bell Director – Engineering &

Infrastructure Mr A Kourambas Director - City Development Mr M Dupe Director – Corporate Development Ms K Stubbings Director – Community Services Mr R Thomas Manager - Governance

THE MEETING OPENED WITH A STATEMENT OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND A STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT

“Knox City Council acknowledges we are on the

traditional land of the Wurundjeri and Bunurong people and pay our respects to elders both past and present.”

BUSINESS: Page Nos. 1. APOLOGIES AND REQUESTS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE

Nil 2. DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Nil 3. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

MOVED: CR. COSSARI SECONDED: CR. COOPER 3.1 Confirmation of Minutes of Ordinary Meeting of Council

held on Tuesday 28 January 2014

CARRIED

MOVED: CR. COSSARI SECONDED: CR. COOPER

3.2 Confirmation of Minutes of Strategic Planning Committee

Meeting held on Tuesday 11 February 2014

CARRIED 4. PETITIONS AND MEMORIALS

Nil 5. REPORTS BY COUNCILLORS

5.1

Committees & Delegates

1.

5.2

Ward Issues

3.

6. CONSIDERING AND ORDERING UPON OFFICERS’ REPORTS WITHIN THE

CITY DEVELOPMENT GROUP

6.1

All Wards Report Of Planning Applications Decided Under Delegation (160/1/06)

6.

6.2

Tirhatuan Ward Application For The Development Of Twenty Seven (27) Two Storey Dwellings At 27-33 Stamford Crescent, Rowville, Melway Ref. 81 J1 (P2013/6377)

11.

COUNCIL 25 February 2014 6. CONSIDERING AND ORDERING UPON OFFICERS’ REPORTS WITHIN THE

CITY DEVELOPMENT GROUP (cont’d)

6.3

Scott Ward Application To Develop The Land For Five Dwellings (Three Double Storey Dwellings And Two Single Storey Dwellings) And Alteration Of Access To A Road Zone Category 1 At 430 Scoresby Road, Ferntree Gully, Melway Ref 73 D3 (Application No P/2013/6578)

43.

6.4

Tirhatuan Ward Application To End Two (2) Section 173 Agreements For Lots Within Stage 4 Of Harcrest Estate At 525 Stud Road, Wantirna South Melway Ref. 72 J2/K2

71.

6.5

Chandler Ward Application For A Twenty-Two Lot Residential Subdivision, Removal Of Vegetation, Alteration Of Access To Category 1 Road, Construction Of Fencing And Site Works And Planning Scheme Amendment C114 To Rezone Land From Industrial 1 To Residential 3 Zone At 1268 Mountain Highway, The Basin. Melway Ref. 65 F7 (Application No. P2013/6113)

89.

6.6

Collier Ward Jenkins Site - Update On The Status Of Amendment C74 (Rezoning Of Land At 1201 To 1211 High Street Road And Lot 12 Pumps Road, Wantirna South) (Melways Ref 63 C12)

134.

6.7

Dinsdale Ward Proposed Rezoning Of Council Property – 7 Church Street, Bayswater (Melway Ref: 64 E3)

150.

7. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME (Following the completion of business relating to Item 6, City Development, the business before the Council Meeting will be deferred to consider questions submitted by the public). 163. 8. CONSIDERING AND ORDERING UPON OFFICERS’ REPORTS WITHIN THE

ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP

8.1

Baird Ward Petition Calling For The Limitation Of Through Traffic In Western Road, Boronia

165.

8.2

Dobson Ward Segarta Circuit Tree Removal – Petition

173.

COUNCIL 25 February 2014 8. CONSIDERING AND ORDERING UPON OFFICERS’ REPORTS WITHIN THE

ENGINEERING & INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP (cont’d)

8.3

All Wards Draft Play Space Plan (2013-2023)

181.

8.4

All Wards Contract Extension – Contract No. 1789 – Pruning Of Trees And General Arboricultural Services

190.


COMMUNITY SERVICES GROUP

9.1

All Wards Preschool Policy And Procedure - Revisions In 2014

209.

9.2

All Wards Review Of Victorian Public Libraries

241.

9.3

All Wards Leisure Minor Capital Works Grant Scheme Policy Review

249.


CORPORATE DEVELOPMENT GROUP

10.1

Dinsdale Ward Lease Of Council Land Rear Of Factories 8 And 9/24 Longstaff Road, Bayswater (Melway Ref: 64 K2)

285.

10.2

Collier Ward Discontinuance Of Road (Known As Kidderminster Drive) Between 4 And 6 Ainsdale Avenue, Wantirna (Melways Ref: 63 H6)

290.

10.3

All Wards 2013-14 Annual Plan Progress Report To 31 December 2013

295.

10.4

All Wards Management Financial Report For The Half Year Ended 31 December 2013

299.

10.5

Friberg Ward Waterford Valley Golf Course And Retirement Village

311.

COUNCIL 25 February 2014 11. ITEMS FOR INFORMATION

11.1

All Wards Supplementary Valuations

319.

11.2

All Wards Works Report As at 6 February 2014

324.

11.3

All Wards Assemblies of Councillors

342.

12. MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN GIVEN 346. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY ITEMS 346. 14. URGENT BUSINESS 346. 14.1 Urgent Business 346. 14.2 Call Up Items 346.

14.2.1 Christmas Decorations 346. 15. QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE 331. GRAEME EMONSON CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

1 COUNCIL - REPORTS BY COUNCILLORS 25 February 2014

5. REPORTS BY COUNCILLORS

5.1 Committees & Delegates 5.1.1 COUNCILLOR JOE COSSARI Councillor Cossari attended the following Meetings

· Knox Central Advisory Committee · Leadership Weekend · Knox Multicultural Advisory Committee · Chief Executive Officer's Performance Evaluation Committee · Sant Nirankari Mission Melbourne Community Event 5.1.2 COUNCILLOR PETER LOCKWOOD Councillor Lockwood attended the following Meetings

· Citizenship Ceremony · Knox Arts and Cultural Advisory Committee · Eastern Transport Coalition · Community Health and Wellbeing Reference Group · Knox Central Advisory Committee · Municipal Association of Victoria

o Regional Meeting at Knox o Board Meeting o Professional Development Committee

5.1.3 COUNCILLOR KARIN ORPEN Councillor Orpen attended the following Meetings

· Ferntree Gully Football and Cricket Clubs · Knox Central Advisory Committee · Knox Share the Joy Thank You to Volunteers · Leadership Weekend · Chief Executive Officer's Performance Evaluation Committee · Mountain Gate Shopping Centre Update Councillor Orpen advised that when she attended the Knox Share the Joy Thank You to Volunteers a special mention was made about the support Council provided to Knox Infolink to fund the coordinator for this event. Councillor Orpen passed on a special thank you and congratulations to Council staff for their amazing support and generosity. The Share the Joy appeal event made a huge difference to thousands of residents.


5.1 Committees & Delegates (cont'd)

5.1.4 COUNCILLOR JOHN MORTIMORE Councillor Mortimore attended the following Meetings

· Knox Active Ageing Advisory Committee · Youth Issues Advisory Committee · Rotary Art & Craft Market · The Basin Music Festival · Community Health and Wellbeing Reference Group · Environment Advisory Committee · Eastern Alliance for Greenhouse Action 5.1.5 COUNCILLOR DAVID COOPER Councillor Cooper attended the following Meetings

· Knox Central Advisory Committee · Management Advisory Committee for Cathies Lane Transfer Station · Knox Arts and Cultural Advisory Committee · Leadership Weekend · Recreation and Leisure Liaison Group Councillor Cooper advised that staff at the Cathies Lane Transfer Station took positive action in controlling the recent mattress fire until the local Fire Brigade was on site. Councillor Cooper further advised that management of the Transfer Station had equipped the station with fire fighting equipment including additional water storage facilities and transportable water pods. 5.1.6 COUNCILLOR NICOLE SEYMOUR Councillor Seymour attended the following Meetings

· Community Health and Wellbeing Reference Group · Early Years Advisory Committee · Leadership Weekend · Planning Consultative Committee 5.1.7 COUNCILLOR TONY HOLLAND Councillor Holland attended the following Meetings

· Knox Central Advisory Committee · Leadership Weekend · Bunjil Way User Groups


5.1 Committees & Delegates (cont'd) 5.1.8 COUNCILLOR DARREN PEARCE (MAYOR) Councillor Pearce attended the following Meetings

· Knox Ratepayers Association · Induction of Senior Pastor - Rowville Baptist Church · Municipal Association of Victoria Consultation Session · Healthy Together Victoria, State Health Minister, Hon David Davis MLC

meeting new Mayors · Ministerial-Mayors Advisory Panel · Official Opening of Dairy Plant Upgrade at Parmalat, Rowville with Dr

Denis Napthine, Premier of Victoria · Leadership Weekend · Citizenship Ceremony · Chief Executive Officer's Performance Evaluation Committee · Sant Nirankari Mission Melbourne Community Event · Economic Development Committee

5.2 Ward Issues 5.2.1 COUNCILLOR SEYMOUR (TIRHATUAN WARD) · Councillor Seymour advised that a consultant for the Carrington Park

Future Directions Plan has been appointed and that there will be opportunities for input from all interested parties.

· Councillor Seymour advised that community consultation for the Draft Knox Housing Strategy has commenced and that through this process questions and concerns of the community can be addressed. Councillor Seymour further advised that there will be opportunities for public participation and that it is important that submissions are made for consideration by the panel.

5.2.2 COUNCILLOR COOPER (SCOTT WARD) · Councillor Cooper advised that construction works had commenced at the

Kubix site at the corner of Burwood Highway and Stud Road, Wantirna with all apartments for the first building being sold. Councillor Cooper also commented that sales for the second building were now open. Councillor Cooper further commented that of the 50 apartments built in the Stud Road complex (near High Street Road) only four (4) were remaining unsold which indicated a demand for this type of accommodation.

· Councillor Cooper offered his congratulations to Dr Ian Bell and his team on the health of newly planted street trees despite the recent heatwave conditions.


5.2 Ward Issues (cont'd)

5.2.3 COUNCILLOR MORTIMORE (CHANDLER WARD) · Councillor Mortimore advised that The Basin Music Festival will be

launched in 17 days (Friday, 14 March 2014) and invited his fellow Councillors to appear on stage on Sunday, 16 March at noon with other dignitaries.

· Councillor Mortimore advised that the Alchester and The Basin Villages built form teams were commencing work to enhance the attributes of the Villages. Councillor Mortimore thanked Councillor Orpen for her input on earlier models of the Ferntree Gully Village Structure that enabled these plans to reach to this point.

· Councillor Mortimore advised that a resident has expressed his appreciation of work undertaken by Council's drainage team in alleviating previous difficulties that the resident had experienced.

5.2.4 COUNCILLOR ORPEN (DOBSON WARD) · Councillor Orpen advised that the Knox Festival is being conducted this

weekend. Councillor Orpen further advised that the Mayor, Councillor Pearce and the Chief Executive Officer, Mr Graeme Emonson would be participating in a fund raising event at the Festival for local resident, Chloe Bramwell and her family. Tickets for an opportunity to "Dunk the Mayor or Chief Executive Officer" will be available for $1.00 per throw.

5.2.5 COUNCILLOR GILL (DINSDALE WARD) · Councillor Gill advised that a budget allocation has been made for the

development of the Marie Wallace Reserve Masterplan.


5.2 Ward Issues (cont'd) 5.2.6 COUNCILLOR COSSARI (COLLIER WARD) · Councillor Cossari advised that he had been thanked by a friend of the

young woman attacked in November 2013. Councillor Cossari further advised that he had been informed that news of the attack and support offered has spread worldwide.

· Councillor Cossari advised that he had attended the Sant Nirankari Mission Melbourne Community Event which was enjoyed by all attendees.

· Councillor Cossari advised that he looks forward to dunking the Mayor at the Knox Festival this weekend.

· Councillor Cossari advised that he has been appointed to the Eastern Metropolitan Regional Advisory Council to the Victorian Multicultural Commission by the Minister for Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship, the Hon. Nicholas Kotsiras, MP.

5.2.7 COUNCILLOR PEARCE (TAYLOR WARD) · Councillor Pearce advised that the Rowville Baptist Church had appointed

a new Pastor and was sure that given the Pastor's enthusiasm his appointment would be successful.

· Councillor Pearce advised that he had attended the Sant Nirankari Mission Melbourne Community Event and that the Mission was an asset to the community and he encouraged everyone to visit the Mission.

· Councillor Pearce advised that he was looking forward to participating in the "Dunk your Boss" event at the Knox Festival.

6 COUNCIL – CITY DEVELOPMENT 25 February 2014 ALL WARDS

6.1 REPORT OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS DECIDED UNDER DELEGATION

SUMMARY: Manager – City Planning (Paul Dickie)

Details of planning applications considered under delegation are referred for information. It is recommended that the items be noted.

RECOMMENDATION

That the planning applications decided under delegation report (between 1 January to 31 January 2014) be noted.

REPORT

Details of planning applications decided under delegation from 1 January to 31 January 2014 are attached. The applications are summarised as follows:

Application Type No

Building Extensions: Residential Other

10 2

Dwelling 1

Units 11

Commercial 1

Tree Removal/Pruning 18

Subdivision 22

Change of Use 2

Car Parking 1

TOTAL 68 COUNCIL RESOLUTION MOVED: CR. COOPER SECONDED: CR. MORTIMORE

That the planning applications decided under delegation report (between 1 January to 31 January 2014) be noted.

CARRIED

7 COUNCIL – CITY DEVELOPMENT 25 February 2014

Knox City Council Planning Applications Decided by Responsible Officer

1 January 2014 to 31 January 2014

Ward No/ Type Address Description Decision:

Baird 2013/6362 46 Westley Street FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

Development of the land for three (3) double storey and one (1) single storey dwellings (total 4 dwellings)

31/01/2014 Approved

Baird 2014/6016 262 Boronia Road BORONIA VIC 3155

The removal of one Corymbia citriodora Hook.

14/01/2014 Approved

Baird 2013/6711 13 Moira Avenue FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

2 lot subdivision (approved development site)

3/01/2014 Approved

Baird 2012/6758 119 Scoresby Road BAYSWATER VIC 3153

2 Lot Subdivision (Approved Unit Site)

17/01/2014 Approved

Baird 2013/6728 245 Scoresby Road BORONIA VIC 3155

2 (Two) Lot Subdivision (Approved Unit Site)

15/01/2014 Approved

Baird 2013/6536 2 Cindy Court FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156


30/01/2014 Approved

Baird 2013/6823 129 Dorset Road BORONIA VIC 3155


24/01/2014 Approved

Baird 2013/6824 12 Simpson Road FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156


22/01/2014 Approved

Baird 2013/6791 283 Scoresby Road BORONIA VIC 3155


14/01/2014 Approved

Baird 2013/6946 1/12 Duncan Avenue BORONIA VIC 3155

Removal of one Eucalyptus cephalocarpa

3/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2014/6021 14 Waratah Avenue THE BASIN VIC 3154

The pruning and removal of trees on the site

15/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2012/6899 158 Dorset Road BORONIA VIC 3155

Use and development of the land for a medical centre and alterations and access to a Road Zone Category 1

16/01/2014 Notice of Decision

Chandler 2014/6041 39 Harcourt Road BORONIA VIC 3155

The removal of two Eucalyptus obliqua trees and prune one other Eucalyptus obliqua

28/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2013/6662 306-308 Dorset Road BORONIA VIC 3155

Six (6) lot subdivision (approved unit site)

22/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2014/6044 3 Yates Court THE BASIN VIC 3154

The removal of two trees (Fraxinus excelsoir 'Aurea' & Pyrus calleryana)

30/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2013/6774 19 Pope Avenue BORONIA VIC 3155

Buildings and Works (Garage) and the removal of vegetation

30/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2013/6943 64 Stewart Street BORONIA VIC 3155

Removal of one Eucalyptus ovata and pruning of a second Eucalyptus ovata.

2/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2013/6956 4 Taranto Court BORONIA VIC 3155 Remove 1 Corymbia maculata 2/01/2014

Approved



Chandler 2014/6003 76 Arcadia Avenue THE BASIN VIC 3154

Removal of 1 Eucalyptus pseudoglobulus

9/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2014/6006 33 Augusta Road THE BASIN VIC 3154

The removal of one (1) Corymbia citriodora (Lemon scented Gum)

15/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2014/6045 33 Harcourt Road BORONIA VIC 3155

The removal of one (1) Eucalyptus species

30/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2014/6042 2/37 Harcourt Road BORONIA VIC 3155

Removal of one (1) Acacia melanoxylon

28/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2013/6619 35 Hansen Road BORONIA VIC 3155

Buildings and Works (alterations and additions to existing dwelling) and the removal of vegetation

30/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2014/6009 61 Landscape Drive BORONIA VIC 3155

Remove seven trees and prune one tree

13/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2013/6955 2 Moncoe Street BORONIA VIC 3155

The removal of one Quercus robur

3/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2014/6019 14 Ronald Crescent BORONIA VIC 3155

Removal of one Eucalyptus saligna Smith.

15/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2013/6858 37 Southey Road BORONIA VIC 3155

Buildings and works (verandah)

21/01/2014 Approved

Chandler 2014/6004 40 Southey Road BORONIA VIC 3155

The removal of one XCuppressocyparis leylandii

9/01/2014 Approved

Collier 2013/6720 1 Toni Court WANTIRNA VIC 3152


9/01/2014 Approved

Collier 2013/6712 22 Clarence Road WANTIRNA VIC 3152


6/01/2014 Approved

Dinsdale 2013/6169 3 Armstrong Road BAYSWATER VIC 3153


17/01/2014 Approved

Dinsdale 2014/6007 20 Dixon Court BORONIA VIC 3155

Removal of a Eucalyptus globulus

8/01/2014 Approved

Dinsdale 2013/6889 3 Bent Court WANTIRNA SOUTH VIC 3152

Dwelling addition and alterations

21/01/2014 Approved

Dinsdale 2013/6839 13 Leonard Street BAYSWATER VIC 3153


24/01/2014 Approved

Dinsdale 2013/6857 5 View Road BAYSWATER VIC 3153

11 Lot Subdivision (Approved Development Site)

30/01/2014 Approved

Dinsdale 2013/6708 12 Grogan Court BAYSWATER VIC 3153

The construction of two double storey dwellings on the land


Dinsdale 2013/6721 8 Harris Grove BAYSWATER VIC 3153


7/01/2014 Approved

Dinsdale 2013/6732 27 Westham Crescent BAYSWATER VIC 3153

The construction of two single storey dwellings to the rear of the existing dwelling


Dobson 2013/6848 9 Beilby Close UPPER FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

Buildings and works (extension to existing dwelling and construction of a verandah)

30/01/2014 Approved

Dobson 2013/6773 70 Forest Road FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

Buildings and Works (Construction of a garage)

2/01/2014 Approved



Dobson 2013/6820 26 Alma Avenue FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

Development of the land for a single dwelling

21/01/2014 Approved

Dobson 2013/6723 14 Winwood Drive FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

Buildings and Works (construction of a shed and the removal of one (1) Spotted gum)

13/01/2014 Approved

Dobson 2013/6954

Upper Ferntree Gully Railway Station, 1183 Burwood Highway UPPER FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

Construction of new building on existing station platform for use by Protective Services Officers

10/01/2014 Approved

Dobson 2013/6854

Upper Ferntree Gully Railway Station, 1183 Burwood Highway UPPER FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

Extension to existing building on the station platform for use by Staff

10/01/2014 Approved

Dobson 2013/6865 33 Parkview Drive FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156 Construction of a Garage 2/01/2014

Approved

Dobson 2013/6764 31 Bellfield Drive LYSTERFIELD VIC 3156


24/01/2014 Approved

Dobson 2013/6778 16 Seascape Close FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

Buildings and Works - Shed 28/01/2014 Approved

Dobson 2014/6028 3 Bruce Crescent FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

The removal of one dead Oak tree

22/01/2014 Approved

Friberg 2014/6035 19/421 Scoresby Road FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

Removal of a Eucalyptus obliqua (Messmate Stringybark)

22/01/2014 Approved

Friberg 2013/6843 8 Cherrytree Rise KNOXFIELD VIC 3180


24/01/2014 Approved

Friberg 2013/6621 26 Renwick Road FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

The construction of a single storey dwelling at the rear of the existing dwelling


Friberg 2013/6718 17 Lambourne Avenue ROWVILLE VIC 3178

The construction of a single storey dwelling to the rear of the existing dwelling

31/01/2014 Approved

Friberg 2013/6486 45 Harley Street KNOXFIELD VIC 3180

The development of the land for a double storey dwelling to the rear of the existing dwelling


Friberg 2013/6710 8 Ashton Road FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156


2/01/2014 Approved

Friberg 2013/6826 138 Windermere Drive FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156


24/01/2014 Approved

Friberg 2013/6383 37 Harwell Road FERNTREE GULLY VIC 3156

Development of the land for a single storey dwelling to the rear of the existing dwelling


Scott 2013/6840 12 Wallace Road WANTIRNA SOUTH VIC 3152


24/01/2014 Approved



Scott 2013/6353 24 Blind Creek Lane WANTIRNA SOUTH VIC 3152

The development of land for a double storey dwelling to the rear of the existing dwelling & the removal of restrictive Covenant L6599825

31/01/2014 Approved

Scott 2013/6742 1397 High Street Road WANTIRNA SOUTH VIC 3152

Four (4) Lot Subdivision (Approved Unit Site)

14/01/2014 Approved

Taylor 2013/6835 11 Allamanda Boulevard LYSTERFIELD VIC 3156

Buildings and works (Construction of a deck and verandah to the side of the existing dwelling)

30/01/2014 Approved

Taylor 2013/6658 259 Dandelion Drive ROWVILLE VIC 3178

The construction of a double storey dwelling to the rear of the existing dwelling

20/01/2014 Approved

Taylor 2013/6722 13 Jamieson Avenue ROWVILLE VIC 3178


9/01/2014 Approved

Tirhatuan 2013/6805 39 South Corporate Avenue ROWVILLE VIC 3178

Change of use (indoor recreation centre), buildings and works, and installation of internally illuminated signage


Tirhatuan 2013/6729 101/1091 Stud Road ROWVILLE VIC 3178

The change of use of the land for a liquor licence associated with a restaurant

28/01/2014 Approved

Tirhatuan 2013/6786 10 Jellico Drive SCORESBY VIC 3179

Reduction of car parking requirements for the increase to floor area of an existing use

24/01/2014 Approved

Tirhatuan 2013/6019 4 Avalon Road ROWVILLE VIC 3178

The construction of a double storey dwelling to the side of existing dwelling

16/01/2014 Approved

Tirhatuan 2013/6758 7 Simon Avenue ROWVILLE VIC 3178

The construction of two (2) double storey dwellings on the land


Tirhatuan 2013/6719 11 Gilbert Court SCORESBY VIC 3179


7/01/2014 Approved

TOTAL: 68

11 COUNCIL – CITY DEVELOPMENT 25 February 2014 COUNCILLOR GILL VACATED THE CHAMBER AT 7.26PM DURING DISCUSSION ON ITEM 6.2 COUNCILLOR GILL RETURNED TO THE CHAMBER AT 7.30PM DURING DISCUSSION ON ITEM 6.2

TIRHATUAN WARD

6.2 APPLICATION FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF TWENTY SEVEN (27) TWO STOREY DWELLINGS AT 27-33 STAMFORD CRESCENT, ROWVILLE, Melway Ref. 81 J1 (P2013/6377)

1. SUMMARY:

Land: 27-33 Stamford Crescent, Rowville Applicant: Meldev Proposed Development: Development of the land for 27 two storey

dwellings Existing Land Use: Single Dwellings Area/Density: 3,302 m2 / 1:122m2 Zoning: Residential 1 Zone Overlays: Nil Local Policy: Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS)

Housing Policy Neighbourhood Character Policy

Application Received: 11 June 2013 Number of Objections: 26 PCC Meeting: Not applicable Assessment:

An application for review of Council’s failure to make a decision within the prescribed timeframes of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 has been lodged with VCAT.

The proposal is not considered to be consistent with the Municipal Strategic Statement, Housing Policy, Clause 52.06 (Car Parking), and ResCode.

On balance it is considered that the proposal does not respond to State and Local Planning Policies. If Council were in a position to decide on the application, it is recommended that a Notice of Refusal would have been issued.

2. BACKGROUND

2.1 Background

The Stud Park Structure Plan (Stage 2), which seeks to provide direction for future development within the broader areas surrounding the Stud Park Shopping Centre was adopted by Council in June 2010 and, as an approved plan, provides guidance to Council in assessing development applications within the Structure Plan area.

12 COUNCIL – CITY DEVELOPMENT 25 February 2014 6.2 27-33 Stamford Crescent, Rowville (cont’d)

On 27 April 2011, Council resolved to review the Stud Park Structure Plan – Stage 2 and adopt an interim height limit of 3 storeys (9 metres) in the proposed Substantial and Moderate Change areas. The Council resolution is as follows:

“That Council:

1. Defer public exhibition of Amendment C92 (as resolved at the 8 June 2010 Strategic Planning Committee meeting) until further resolved by Council at a future Council meeting.

2. Conduct a review of the Stud Park Structure Plan (Stage 2) focusing on objectives and planning guidelines relating to built form outcomes in the proposed Substantial and Moderate Change areas to provide greater certainty.

3. Adopt an interim 3 storey height limit (9 metres) in the proposed Substantial and Moderate Change areas pending the outcome of the Stud Park Structure Plan review.

4. Refer the Stud Park Structure Plan review to the Housing Advisory Committee to ensure that the findings are consistent with the Housing Policy review currently underway.

5. Receive a further report with the findings of the Stud Park Structure Plan (Stage 2) review for consideration.”

Given the decision of Council to Review the Stud Park Structure Plan (Stage 2) and the location of the site in a Substantial Change area; no weight is given to the Plan or Design Guidelines in the assessment of this application and instead, the application must be assessed against State and Local Planning Policies, including the Neighbourhood Character Policy at Clause 22.07 and the Housing Policy at Clause 22.10.

The following report reflects this direction of assessment.

On 26 November 2013, Council adopted the Draft Rowville Plan for public exhibition, and the Draft Housing Strategy for Public Exhibition. Exhibition of Amendment C131 to the Knox Planning Scheme (which implements the Draft Rowville Plan and the Draft Housing Strategy) has commenced. Amendment C131 is not a ‘seriously entertained proposal’ at this time, and no weight has been given to the Draft Rowville Plan or the Draft Housing Policy in the assessment of this application.


2.2 Subject Site and Surrounds The location of the subject site is shown in Appendix A. · The site comprises 4 rectangular allotments, located on the eastern side

of Stamford Crescent, Rowville, having a total area of 3,302m2. The site falls approximately 2.5 metres from east to west.

· Each site contains a single dwelling, with varying setbacks from Stamford

Crescent. The sites are sparsely or moderately vegetated and do not contain any significant native vegetation.

· A 1.8 metre easement is located along the rear of all 4 allotments. A 2.44

metre wide easement is located along the northern boundary of No.27. No restrictive covenants apply to the land.

· The adjoining properties are zoned for residential use and have been

developed accordingly. Development is a mix of single dwellings on a lot, medium density units, townhouses, and apartment buildings. Stud Park Shopping Centre is located approximately 120 metres to the east, across Stud Road.

2.3 The Proposal

(Refer to attached plans at Appendix B)

It is proposed to construct 27 two storey dwellings over 4 allotments. Details are as follows: · The proposed development has a maximum height of 6.9 metres and is

setback a minimum 6.6 metres from the front boundary. Side setbacks are 2.6 and 2 metres, the rear setback is 3.2 metres.

· The dwellings are of a modern design and feature brickwork and render finishes. Two access ways are provided from Stamford Crescent, the design is effectively mirrored down the centre. Waste facilities are located within the front setback.

· The proposed development consists of twenty five 2 bedroom dwellings

and two 3 bedroom dwellings. Private open space is provided by way of private balconies and a small courtyard to the rear of each dwelling.


· Each 2 bedroom unit is provided with a single car parking space. The 3

bedroom units are provided with two spaces in a tandem arrangement. Six visitor spaces are provided.

· All vegetation would be removed from the site to accommodate the proposed development.

3. CONSULTATION

3.1 Advertising

The application was advertised by way of a sign on the site and notices were sent to adjoining property owners and occupiers. A total of 26 objections were received from 18 properties and are summarised below.

Inconsistent with neighbourhood character and density; overdevelopment

· The proposal is not considered to be consistent with the preferred character of the area. The impact of the proposal on neighbourhood character will be discussed later in the report.

Traffic impacts, congestion and safety

· Council’s Traffic Department have raised concerns in relation to the location of the northern access way. It is noted however that the provision of car parking spaces and visitor spaces met the minimum requirements.

· The proposal is not expected to create unreasonable safety concerns. Vehicles would be able to exit in a forward direction from the car parking area.

Amenity impacts (overlooking, overshadowing, loss of privacy)

· Upper floor windows and balconies are shown to be screened in accordance with Standard B22 of ResCode.

· Overshadowing to adjoining properties complies with ResCode Standard B21.


Inadequate landscaping

· The site provides the ability to plant substantial trees within the front setback only. Due to the small southern boundary setback and the location of easements on the property, substantial planting cannot be achieved along the side or rear boundaries. The layout of the site and internal access ways also ensures that no significant planting can be achieved throughout the site.

Noise and social issues

· The proposed development would not be expected to emit noise above that of typical residential development or normal residential background noise. The type of people who may purchase a dwelling is not a matter for planning consideration.

Waste collection unsightly on bin day

· Bins located on the street one day per week are normal to suburban life and bins should only be on the street for a short time. It is noted however that the bin storage areas located within the front setback are a poor planning outcome, impacting negatively on the streetscape. A waste management plan would need to be approved as part of any permit issued and it is unlikely that street side collection would be supported.

3.2 Planning Consultative Committee Meeting

A Planning Consultative Committee (PCC) Meeting was not held as a failure to determine appeal was lodged at VCAT before a PCC meeting could be scheduled.

3.3 Referrals

The application has been referred to internal departments for comment. Some issues were identified; the following is a summary of relevant advice:

Traffic Engineer

· The location of the northern access way is not appropriate with regard to the T-Intersection for Hillview Avenue. The northern access way needs to be relocated to comply with AS 2890.1.

· All cars to be able to exit the site in the forward direction.

Drainage Engineer

· Standard conditions to be included on any permit issued.


City Futures

· Object to the issue of a planning permit.

· The development is not consistent with the desired character of the area or the Municipal Strategic Statement – (Housing).

· The continuous two storey bulk along the boundaries is not consistent with the existing or preferred neighbourhood character of the area, particularly when combined with the limited opportunities for planting on the site.

Waste

· A satisfactory Waste Management Plan would be required.

Arborist

· None of the vegetation located on the site requires a permit to be removed. The site does not provide any opportunities for substantial planting along the side or rear boundaries or within the site.

Assets and Parks

· No objections.

4. DISCUSSION

This section considers the proposed development in light of the provisions of the Knox Planning Scheme including State and Local Planning Policies, any other relevant policies and objectives.

4.1 Zoning and Overlays

4.1.1 Zone

The site is located within the Residential 1 Zone. Within the Residential 1 Zone (R1Z) a planning permit is required to construct more than one dwelling on a lot.

· A ResCode assessment has been undertaken in Section 4.3 of this report.

4.1.2 Overlays

· The land is not affected by any planning overlays.


4.2 Policy Consideration

4.2.1 State Planning Policy Framework State policy requires Council to integrate the range of policies relevant to the issues to be determined, and balance conflicting objectives in favour of net community benefit and sustainable development.

Key Policies:

Clause 11.01-2 Activity Centre Planning – Encourage the concentration of retail, residential, commercial, administrative, entertainment and cultural developments into Activity Centres. · The site is located in a Major Activity Centre and therefore some

level of re-development is acceptable. Clause 15 Built Environment and Heritage – Encourages high quality architecture and urban design outcomes that reflect the particular characteristics, aspirations and cultural identity of the community; enhances liveability, diversity, amenity and safety of the public realm; and promotes attractiveness of towns and cities within broader strategic contexts.

· The proposed design is repetitious and bulky, providing for a high yield, low quality outcome.

· Large communal bin areas located within the front setback are unsightly and unacceptable as an interface to the footpath and street. The bin areas also detract from the only suitable area available for meaningful landscaping of the site.

· The development provides limited or no landscaping opportunities within the site and along the side and rear boundaries.

· Internal access ways do not provide for meaningful landscaping and there is minimal passive surveillance in these areas if balconies are unoccupied.

Clause 15.02 Sustainable Development – Ensure land use and development is consistent with the efficient use of energy and the minimisation of greenhouse gas emissions.

· A satisfactory sustainable design assessment would be a condition on any permit issued. This would ensure that appropriate initiatives are employed in the design to minimise energy use and greenhouse gas emissions.


Clause 16 Housing – Encourage the development of well-designed medium-density housing that respects the neighbourhood character; improves housing choice; makes better use of existing infrastructure; and, improves energy efficiency of housing. Locate new housing in or close to activity centres and employment corridors and at other strategic development sites that offer good access to services and transport.

· Neighbourhood character - This is discussed in a later section of the report (Section 4.2.2).

· Housing choice – The proposed development provides a different form of housing to that provided in the area and provides the option of dwellings on smaller lots which will contribute to housing choice. However this can also be achieved with a design that is less detrimental to the character of the area and employs more considerate urban design initiatives.

· Existing infrastructure – The site is located within a fully serviced area.

· Energy efficiency – Sustainable design initiatives can be undertaken to ensure compliance.

· Location – The site is located within 400 metres walking distance of the Stud Park shopping centre and public transport.

Clause 18 Transport – Ensure that access is provided to all available modes of transport.

· The site is located 360 metres walking distance from the Stud Park Shopping Centre, which is located on Stud Road and forms part of the Principal Public Transport Network (PPTN).

· Smart Bus routes 900 and 901 run along Stud Road, approximately 300 metres walking distance from the site. The 900 service runs between Rowville and Caulfield from 5am to midnight on weekdays, between 6am and midnight on Saturdays, and between 7am and 10pm on Sundays. The 901 service runs between Frankston and Melbourne Airport from 5am to midnight on weekdays, from 6am to midnight on Saturdays, and from 7am to 6pm on Sundays.

· Bus route 681 operates an occasional service along Stud Road, with the closest bus stop located approximately 300 metres walking distance from the site. The one-way service runs between Lysterfield and Knox City at less than hourly intervals from 6:35am to 9pm.


· Bus route 691 runs along Stud Road and out of Stud Park Shopping Centre. The service runs between Boronia and Waverley Gardens from 6am to 7:30pm on weekdays, from 7:30am to 6pm on Saturdays, and from 7:45am to 6pm on Sundays.

· Bus route 754 runs along Stud Road and out of Stud Park Shopping Centre. The service runs between Rowville and Glen Waverley from 6am to 9pm on weekdays, from 8:20am to 9pm on Saturdays, and from 9am to 9pm on Sundays.

4.2.2 Local Planning Policy Framework Clause 21.05-2 Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS) The MSS seeks to reduce the prevalence of infill housing development in dispersed locations as a major form of housing development by promoting activity centres and key redevelopment strategic sites as the preferred location.

· The site is located in a Major Activity Centre and therefore some level of re-development is acceptable.

The MSS further seeks to manage the need for more housing and maintaining the valued qualities of identified areas of environmental and character significance. The MSS supports development that respects the existing or preferred residential neighbourhood character.

· The development is not considered to be consistent with the design objectives of the Garden Suburban Neighbourhood Character Precinct.

· The development provides no visual interest, is repetitious, and provides little in the way of architectural merit. Two large communal bin areas form the primary interface of the site with the street and there is no ability to adequately landscape or screen the bulk of the development with substantial vegetation.

Clause 22.10 Housing: The Housing Policy at Clause 22.10-1 recognises that the population of Knox will grow by 12,000 persons and 15,000 households to 2030. In response to this forecast, the Housing Policy directs the provision of a diversity of housing types and forms; housing that meets the needs of all groups within the community; accessible housing that is well designed and responsive to the local character and environment; and housing that recognises that the environment and landscape significance of the Dandenong Foothills outweighs the need for urban consolidation in the Foothills.


Before deciding on an application, the responsible authority will consider, as appropriate, whether: Where an approved structure plan or urban design framework exists for an activity centre listed above, then the location and design of high and medium density housing be guided by the plan or framework.

· See Section 4.2.3 below. The proposed development will contribute to a diversity of housing in Knox.

· The proposed development proposes two bedroom dwellings that provide for a range of smaller households and land sizes and will contribute to a diversity of housing within Knox. Three bedroom dwellings are common to Knox and account for approximately 85% of housing stock.

There is access to frequent public transport services between 6.00am and 11.00pm daily, seven days a week.

· The site does not have access to public transport that operates between 6.00am and 11.00pm daily, seven days a week.

The proposed development is consistent with a relevant endorsed structure plan or urban design framework.

· The development, at a maximum height of 6.9 metres, is consistent with the interim building height established for the area. This height for the entire site creates considerable continuous bulk when viewed from adjoining properties and the street. There is no ability to adequately landscape the site to break up the built form.

The development and building design response addresses any potential impact on adjoining development where there is a residential interface with respect to amenity, overlooking, overshadowing, height and bulk, views and vistas.

· Most overlooking has been addressed. Conditions on any permit issued would require any remaining overlooking to be addressed with additional screening. The buildings are expected to present considerable bulk to adjoining properties for the length of the site.


4.3 Particular Provisions

Clause 52.06 – Car Parking

Prior to a new use commencing or a new building being occupied the car parking spaces required under Clause 52.06-5 must be provided on the land or as approved under Clause 52.06-3 to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.

Clause 52.06-5 outlines the requisite amount of parking to be provided to each dwelling and any applicable visitor parking at a ratio of two car spaces to each three or more bedroom dwelling (with studies or studios that are separate rooms counted as a bedrooms) and one visitor space to every five dwellings for developments of five or more dwellings.

· The proposal satisfies the resident car parking provision for each dwelling, with 1 car space provided for each two bedroom dwelling and 2 spaces to each three bedroom dwelling. Six visitor spaces have been provided.

Clause 52.06-8 details the design standards for car parking. The provision of car parking should meet the design requirements of this Clause. An assessment of the design standards, including any areas of non-compliance are considered below:

Design Standard 1: Accessways – Does not comply. Both accessways provides access to more than 10 car parking spaces and

therefore need to provide a 5 metre wide passing area for the first 7 metres. It is also noted however that Council’s Traffic Department have objected to the location of the northern crossover within the intersection of Stamford Crescent and Hillview Avenue.

Access to visitor parking spaces along the rear boundary is tight and inconvenient at best. The potential for conflict between vehicles and porch pillars is an unnecessary complication and was not considered to be an acceptable outcome.

Design Standard 2: Car Parking Spaces – Does not comply. Tandem carports to dwellings 5 and 25 don’t meet the minimum dimensions.

Design Standard 3: Gradients – Complies.

Design Standard 4: Mechanical Parking – Not applicable.

Design Standard 5: Urban Design – Complies.


Design Standard 6: Safety – Complies.

Design Standard 7: Landscaping – Does not comply. See ResCode assessment above. In addition the need for increased access width further reduces the limited landscaping available to the site.

4.4 Clause 55 – Two or More Dwellings on a Lot and Residential Buildings (ResCode)

Neighbourhood Character and Infrastructure

Neighbourhood Character –Does not comply, refer to Section 4.2.2 above.

Residential Policy – Does not comply, refer to Section 4.2.2 above.

Dwelling Diversity – Complies.

Infrastructure – Complies.

Integration with the Street – Complies.

Site Layout and Building Massing

Street Setback – Does not comply. The required minimum setback under the Standard is 8 metres.

Building Height – Complies.

Site Cover/Permeability – Complies.

Energy Efficiency – Can comply subject to the submission of a satisfactory sustainable design assessment.

Open Space – Complies.

Safety – Does not comply. Surveillance of access ways and recessed entries will be poor or non-existent in many cases due to screening requirements to avoid internal overlooking from balconies. Surveillance will only be available if balconies are occupied.

Landscaping – Does not comply. Landscaping opportunities to side and rear setbacks are not considered to be acceptable. Easements along the northern and eastern boundaries ensure that there is no ability to plant canopy vegetation within these setbacks. The layout of internal access ways is poor and does not allow for any substantial planting to be undertaken within the development.


The front setback houses the waste facilities and would be further reduced by the need to widen driveways to 5 metres for the first seven metres in accordance with Clause 52.06 (Car Parking). There is no ability to plant vegetation to break up the built form of the development.

Access – Does not comply. Council’s Traffic Department have noted that the location of the northern crossover is not appropriate in the T-Intersection of Stamford Crescent and Hillview Avenue.

Parking Location – Does not comply. All visitor parking spaces are located directly adjacent windows of the dwellings within the development.

Amenity Impacts

Side and rear setbacks – Complies.

Walls on boundaries – Complies.

Daylight to existing windows/north facing windows – Complies.

North-facing Windows – Complies.

Overshadowing open space – Complies.

Overlooking – Generally complies. Any additional overlooking would be dealt with as a condition on any permit issued.

Internal views – Complies. However it is noted that to comply a majority of windows in the dwellings are required to be screened creating dwellings with a very poor internal amenity.

Noise Impacts – Complies.

On-Site Amenity and Facilities

Accessibility – Does not comply. All dwellings would be inconvenient to someone with limited mobility as living areas and food preparation facilities are located on the first floor.

Daylight to new windows – Complies.

Private Open Space – Complies.

Solar access – Complies.

Storage – Does not comply. No storage has been indicated on the plans.


Detailed Design

Design Detail – Does not comply. The continuous and expansive bulk of the proposed design is not considered to be acceptable. The design does not allow for appropriate landscaping to break up or screen the built form in a way that would be considered to complement the existing or preferred character of the area. The design is not of a high architectural standard.

Common Property – Complies.

Site Services – Complies.

Front fence – Complies, no front fence proposed.

4.5 General Decision Guidelines

Clause 65 of the Knox Planning Scheme and Section 60 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 set out decision guidelines/matters which the responsible authority must consider when deciding any planning application.

· The decision guidelines of Clause 65 of the Knox Planning Scheme and

Section 60 of the Planning and Environment Act (1987) have been appropriately considered.

5. CONCLUSION

Clause 10.04 of the Knox Planning Scheme requires Council to balance relative policy objectives when making decisions to ensure resulting development is sustainable and achieves a net community gain. In this context, the development is not appropriate given the following:

· The proposed development is not consistent with Clause 15 (Built

Environment and Heritage).

· The proposed development is not consistent with Clause 21.07 (Municipal Strategic Statement), Clause 22.07 (Neighbourhood Character), and Clause 22.10 (Housing) of the Knox Planning Scheme.

· The development is not consistent with standards and objectives of ResCode, specifically; Neighbourhood Character, Residential Policy, Front setback, Landscaping, Accessibility, Access, Parking Location, Storage, and Design detail.

· The development is not consistent with the Design Standards of Clause 52.06 (Car parking).

6. CONFIDENTIALITY

There are no confidentiality issues associated with this report.


RECOMMENDATION

That if Council were in a position to decide on the application it would have issued a Notice of Refusal for the development of twenty seven (27) two storey dwellings at 27-33 Stamford Crescent, on the following grounds:

1. The proposed development is not consistent with State Planning Policy, specifically Clause 15 (Built Environment and Heritage) of the Knox Planning Scheme.

2. The proposal is inconsistent with Clause 21.05 (Municipal Strategic Statement) of the Knox Planning Scheme.

3. The proposal is inconsistent with Local Planning Policy, specifically Clause 22.07 (Neighbourhood Character) and Clause 22.10 (Housing) of the Knox Planning Scheme.

4. The development is not consistent with standards and objectives of ResCode, specifically; Neighbourhood Character, Residential Policy, Front setback, Landscaping, Accessibility, Access, Parking Location, Storage, and Design detail.

5. The development is not consistent with the design standards of Clause 52.06 (Carparking) of the Knox Planning Scheme including; Accessways, Car Parking Spaces, and Landscaping.

COUNCIL RESOLUTION MOVED: CR. SEYMOUR SECONDED: CR. ORPEN That the recommendation be adopted.

PROCEDURAL MOTION

MOVED: CR. ORPEN SECONDED: CR. HOLLAND

That Councillor Lockwood be permitted an extension of time to speak under Clause 47 of the Meeting Procedure and Use of Common Seal Local Law 2008. CARRIED


A Division was called by Councillor Seymour For the motion: Councillor Orpen, Councillor Lockwood,

Councillor Gill, Councillor Pearce, Councillor Seymour, Councillor Cooper, Councillor Mortimore

Against the motion: Councillor Holland, Councillor Cossari THE MOTION WAS CARRIED 7:2


SCOTT WARD

6.3 APPLICATION TO DEVELOP THE LAND FOR FIVE DWELLINGS (THREE DOUBLE STOREY DWELLINGS AND TWO SINGLE STOREY DWELLINGS) AND ALTERATION OF ACCESS TO A ROAD ZONE CATEGORY 1 AT 430 SCORESBY ROAD, FERNTREE GULLY, Melway Ref 73 D3 (Application No P/2013/6578)

1. SUMMARY:

Land: 430 Scoresby Road, Ferntree Gully Applicant: Line Design Proposed Development: Development of the land for five (5)

dwellings (three (3) double storey and two (2) single storey dwellings) and alteration of access to a Road Zone Category 1

Existing Land Use: Single Dwelling Area/Density: 1385m2 / 1:277 m2 Zoning: Residential 3 Zone Overlays: None Local Policy: Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS)

Neighbourhood Character Policy Housing Policy

Application Received: 23 August 2013 Number of Objections: One (1) PCC Meeting: N/A Assessment:

It is considered that the proposal to construct five new dwellings on the land provides an appropriate balance between the need for additional housing within an established residential area, respecting the neighbourhood character, and protecting the amenity of occupants and adjoining residents.

The proposal generally complies with the Housing Policy, Neighbourhood Character Policy and ResCode.

The proposal complies with the Residential 3 Zone.

On balance it is considered that the proposal responds well to State and Local Planning Policies, subject to modifications. It is recommended that Council issue a Notice of Decision to Grant a Planning Permit, subject to conditions.

44 COUNCIL – CITY DEVELOPMENT 25 February 2014 6.3 430 Scoresby Road, Ferntree Gully (cont’d)

2. BACKGROUND

2.1 Background

On 26 November 2013, Council adopted the Draft Housing Strategy for public exhibition. Exhibition of Amendment C131 to the Knox Planning Scheme (which implements the Draft Housing Strategy) has commenced.

Amendment C131 is not a ‘seriously entertained proposal’ at this time, and no weight has been given to the Draft Housing Strategy in the assessment of this application.

2.2 Subject Site and Surrounds

The location of the subject site is shown in Appendix A.

· The subject site is located on the west side of Scoresby Road with a site frontage of approximately 36 metres, site depth of 38 metres and a total site area of approximately 1385m². The site currently accommodates a single dwelling utilised for residential purposes with a carport and outbuildings located to the rear. Vehicular access to the site is gained via an existing crossover to the south of the site frontage.

· The site is sparsely vegetated with established canopy trees.

· Adjoining properties are used for residential purposes, including an Aged Care facility to the immediate north and west. The area contains mostly single storey brick and weatherboard dwellings with high front fences being common along Scoresby Road. There is evidence of multi-dwelling development within the surrounding area.

2.3 The Proposal

(Refer to attached plans at Appendix B)

The application proposes the construction of five dwellings (three (3) double storey and two (2) single storey dwellings) and alteration of access to a Road Zone Category 1. Details of the proposed development are as follows:

· The dwellings are located in two bands, consisting of three dwellings within the northern portion of the site and two dwellings within the southern portion of the site. All dwellings are accessed off a centrally located driveway that connects to a proposed crossover off Scoresby Road.


· Dwelling’s 1 and 2 are double storey and front Scoresby Road. Each dwelling contains three bedrooms, a study, associated living space, amenities, double garage and in excess of 60m² of secluded private open space.

· Dwelling 3 is located within the northern band, behind Dwelling 1, is double storey in form and contains three bedrooms, associated living space, amenities, double garage and 60m² of secluded private open space.

· Dwellings 4 and 5 are single storey, with Dwelling 4 containing 3 bedrooms and associated double garage, while Dwelling 5 contains two bedrooms and a single garage. The dwellings provide 79.5m² and 60m² of secluded private open space respectively.

· The application proposes removal of all vegetation on site.

· The proposed dwellings are to be constructed to a maximum height of 7.1 metres from natural ground level.

· Materials of construction include face brickwork at ground floor levels and selected rendered finishes to the first floor facades with a pitched tiled roof.

3. CONSULTATION

3.1 Advertising

The application was advertised by way of a sign on the site frontage and notices were sent to adjoining property owners and occupiers. One (1) objection was received. The concerns raised in the objections and responses to these concerns are provided below:

Fencing between properties be replaced within 48 hours of vegetation between the properties being removed to preserve their private open space.

· Council cannot condition or enforce such a request. This is an aspect of construction that will need to be agreed to privately between these parties and independent of Council. However, as standard practice, conditions are placed on approvals/permits that require fencing to be constructed in accordance with details on development plans to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority. This condition would form part of any approval to issue.


Concerned that the proposed development will adversely affect the potential future development of their property

· Although this is not a valid planning consideration, it is not expected that the development as proposed which lies within a residential lot will adversely affect the potential future development of adjoining properties.

3.2 Referrals

The application has been referred to VicRoads and internal departments for comment. No objection has been raised; the following is a summary of relevant advice:

VicRoads

· No objection. Standard conditions to be included on any permit to issue.

Traffic Engineer

· No objection. Standard conditions to be included on any permit to issue.

Assets

· No objection.

Stormwater

· The garages associated with Dwelling’s 2 4 and 5 are too low and it will not be possible to capture and direct any runoff to the designated point of discharge (located in the NE corner of the site).

· The floor levels of Units 2 & 4 should be raised by 100-200mm to cater for overland flows.

Officer Response: The floor levels were incorrect on the plans. The correct levels 87.55 (Units 2 & 4) and 87 (Unit 5) satisfy the drainage requirements. Conditions requiring the correct levels, and the additional 100-200mm will form a requirement on any permit to issue.

Arborist

· The trees proposed to be removed are not significant and do not trigger planning permission for their removal.

· With regard to the Leyland Cypress on the neighbouring property to the west, Dwelling 5’s master bedroom will encroach into the TPZ and therefore must be redesigned.

Officer Response: The tree can be accommodated by having the dwelling’s private open space area located within the TPZ area. Redesign changes will form a requirement on any permit to issue.


4. DISCUSSION

This section considers the proposed development in light of the provisions of the Knox Planning Scheme including State and Local Planning Policies, any other relevant policies and objectives.

4.1 Zoning and Overlays

4.1.1 Zone

The site is located within the Residential 3 Zone. A permit is required pursuant to Clause 32.06-4 to construct two or more dwellings on a lot.

The Schedule to the Residential 3 Zone varies ResCode Standards B28 and B32, pertaining to private open space and front fences. To comply with the varied ResCode Standard B28, private open space should consist of an area of 60m² with one part of the private open space to consist of secluded private open space at the side or rear of the dwelling with minimum area of 40m² and minimum dimension of 5 metres. The varied ResCode Standard B32 specifies that a front fence should not exceed 1.2 metres in a residential street and 2 metres adjoining a Road Zone Category 1.

· All five dwellings are provided with a minimum of 60m2 of secluded

private open space, including 40m2 with a minimum dimension of 5 metres located to either the side or rear of each dwelling respectively.

· The proposed 1.8 metre high feature front fence satisfies the fencing height requirement of the Schedule to the zone as the site adjoins a Road Zone Category 1 (Scoresby Road).

4.1.2 Overlays

The land is not affected by any Planning Overlays.

4.2 Policy Consideration

4.2.1 State Planning Policy Framework

State policy requires Council to integrate the range of policies relevant to the issues to be determined, and balance conflicting objectives in favour of net community benefit and sustainable development.


Key Policies:

Clause 15 Built Environment and Heritage – Encourages high quality architecture and urban design outcomes that reflect the particular characteristics, aspirations and cultural identity of the community; enhances liveability, diversity, amenity and safety of the public realm; and promotes attractiveness of towns and cities within broader strategic contexts.

· The design of the development will make a positive contribution to the streetscape, with built form considered to be appropriate in form and scale. The development incorporates important neighbourhood character features such as hipped roofs, brick finishes, eaves and car parking located behind the proposed dwellings. Upper levels are well articulated and are smaller than the ground level to reduce building bulk and mass.

Clause 15.02 Sustainable Development – Ensure land use and development is consistent with the efficient use of energy and the minimisation of greenhouse gas emissions.

· The proposal contributes to the consolidation of urban development through the provision of increased density within an existing residential area within reasonable distance to urban services and transport. Dwellings are orientated to the north and incorporate eaves. Further, should a permit be issued, the development is required to be constructed in accordance with an approved Sustainable Design Assessment.

Clause 16 Housing – Encourage the development of well-designed medium-density housing that respects the neighbourhood character; improves housing choice; makes better use of existing infrastructure; and, improves energy efficiency of housing.

· Neighbourhood character - this is discussed in a later section of the report (Section 4.2.2).

· Housing choice – providing the option of dwellings with two and three bedrooms on smaller lots is considered to increase housing choice.

· Existing infrastructure – the site is located within a fully serviced area.

· Energy efficiency – this has been discussed above under Clause 15.02.

· Location – the site is not within an Activity Centre or key redevelopment site, however the location of the development is considered appropriate as the site is within an established residential area in close proximity to services.


Clause 18 Transport – Ensure that access is provided to all available modes of transport.

· The site is located within 82 metres walking distance from Bus Route No. 753 and 92 metres from Bus Routes No. 755. Both of these services run along Scoresby Road.

· Route 753 provides access to Boronia, Glen Waverley and Bayswater Railway Stations and operates between 6:23am and 9.43pm Monday to Friday, between 7:51am and 9:52pm on Saturdays and between 8:51am and 9:22 on Sundays at various intervals.

· Route 755 provides access to Knox City, Glen Waverley and Bayswater and Boronia Railway Stations and operates between 5:53am and 9.37pm Monday to Friday, between 7:49am and 9:51pm on Saturdays and between 8:47am and 9:20 on Sundays at various intervals.

4.2.2 Local Planning Policy Framework · Clause 21.05-2 Municipal Strategic Statement (MSS) The MSS

seeks to reduce the prevalence of infill and medium density housing development in dispersed locations as a major form of housing development by promoting activity centres, key redevelopment strategic sites, and the Principal Public Transport Network as the preferred location. It also seeks to encourage diversity of housing types, styles, form and sizes to cater for the changing needs of the community, noting that the majority of housing stock in Knox is comprised of 3 and 4 bedroom dwellings. The lack of housing stock diversity is likely to become more apparent as the housing needs of the community change over time.

· The site is not located in an Activity Centre or key redevelopment site.

· The proposed development provides for a range of dwelling sizes and lot sizes, including the provision of a two bedroom dwelling.

The MSS further seeks to manage the need for more housing and maintaining the valued qualities of identified areas of environmental and character significance. The MSS supports development that respects the existing or preferred residential neighbourhood character.

· The location of the site is identified in the City of Knox Housing Strategic Framework Plan to be in an area that is an established residential environ, whereby new infill development must provide a positive contribution to the preferred character of the local area.

· An assessment against Council’s preferred Neighbourhood Character Policy (Clause 22.07) is below.


Clause 22.07 Neighbourhood Character: Garden Court Character Area 4 – The desired future character of this area is for low scale dwellings set within an open landscape with, in some areas, occasional pockets of large native trees. Key design elements of the Garden Suburban Area are detailed as follows; To retain the remnant indigenous and other native trees and encourage the new planting of large native trees

· According to Council’s Arborist, there are no tall trees on the property that are significant and should be retained. A condition on any permit issued will require a satisfactory landscape plan be submitted including the planting of canopy trees.

To maintain the rhythm of spacing between dwellings

· The spacing of the proposed dwellings will allow for adequate planting and reflects the rhythm of the spacing of existing dwellings in the area.

To minimise the dominance of buildings from the street

· The proposed setback of the Dwelling’s 1 and 2 to the street frontage will be 7.17 metres and 7.5 metres respectively which is considered adequate in minimising the dominance of the development from the street frontage.

To minimise loss of front garden space, and dominance of car storage facilities

· An adequate portion of garden space is provided within the front

setback.

· The garages associated with Dwellings 1 and 2, which front the street are proposed to be located to the rear of these dwellings and therefore will not be visible from the street frontage.

To maintain the openness of front boundary treatments. · The garages associated with Dwellings 1 and 2, which front the street

are proposed to be located to the rear of these dwellings and therefore will not be visible from the street frontage.

Clause 22.10 Housing: Medium Density – The Housing Policy at Clause 22.10-1 recognises that the population of Knox will grow by 12,000 persons and 15,000 households over the 25 years to 2030.


In response to this forecast, the Housing Policy directs that infill medium density housing in dispersed residential locations respects and complements the desired future residential character objectives of Clause 22.07 Neighbourhood Character Policy and Clause 22.01 Dandenong Foothills Policy, where relevant.

Before deciding on an application, the responsible authority will consider, as appropriate, whether:

The proposed development will contribute to a diversity of housing in Knox.

· The proposed development will contribute to a diversity of housing in

Knox through the addition of smaller dwellings with smaller private open space areas and a diversity in bedroom numbers (two and three bedroom dwellings provided).

The proposed development makes a positive contribution to the desired future urban fabric, amenity and neighbourhood character.

· It is considered that the proposal is consistent with the strategies and objectives of the Neighbourhood Character Policy and is an adequate design response for the site.

There is access to frequent public transport services between 6.00am and 11.00pm daily, seven days a week. · The site does not have access to public transport that operates

between 6.00am and 11.00pm daily, seven days a week.

4.3 Particular Provisions

Clause 52.06 – Car Parking

Clause 52.06-1 requires that prior to a new use commencing, the car parking spaces required under Clause 52.06-5 must be provided on the land or as approved under Clause 52.06-3 to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.

Clause 52.06-5 outlines the requisite amount of parking to be provided to each dwelling and any applicable visitor parking at a ratio of two car spaces to each three or more bedroom dwelling (with studies or studios that are separate rooms counted as a bedrooms) and one visitor space to every five dwellings for developments of five or more dwellings.


Parking for a dwelling is to be provided at a ratio of 2 spaces for every 3 bedroom dwelling plus 1 visitor parking space is required for every 5 units.

· The proposal satisfies the car parking provision with 1 car space being provided for Dwelling 5 (two bedrooms) and 2 car spaces provided for all other dwellings.

· One visitor car park is provided consistent with requirements.

Clause 52.06-8 details the design standards for car parking. The provision of car parking should meet the design requirements of this Clause. An assessment of the design standards, including any areas of non-compliance are considered below: Design Standards for Car Parking Design Standard 1: Access ways – Can comply. A condition on any permit will require a passing area at the entrance be provided at dimension 5metres wide by 7 metres in length; and that adequate sightlines and splays are provided. All consequential changes will be required to be to Council’s satisfaction. Design Standard 2: Car Parking Spaces – Complies, however as an added measure the door associated with Unit 4’s garage will be required to be altered so it opens outwards (into the dwelling itself) to ensure the garage is clear of all obstructions. Design Standard 3: Gradients – N/A. Design Standard 4: Mechanical Parking – N/A. Design Standard 5: Urban Design – Complies. Design Standard 6: Safety – Complies. Design Standard 7: Landscaping – Complies.


Clause 52.29 – Land adjacent to a Road Zone Category 1 The purpose of this clause is to ensure appropriate access to identified roads. A permit is required to create or alter access to a road in Road Zone Category. As Dwelling 1 is proposed to have a new crossover/access to Scoresby Road which is a Category 1 Road, a permit is required for the proposal under the clause. The application was referred to VicRoads, who had no objection to the proposed access.

4.4 Clause 55 – Two or More Dwellings on a Lot and Residential Buildings (ResCode)

The proposal generally complies with the provisions of Clause 55 of the Knox Planning Scheme, an assessment of the key criteria; including any areas of non compliance are considered below:

Neighbourhood Character and Infrastructure

Neighbourhood Character – Complies, refer to Section 4.2.2 above.

Residential Policy – Complies. Infrastructure – Complies. Integration with the Street – Complies. Site Layout and Building Massing

Street Setback – Complies with the objective. The setback of 7.52 metres is consistent with the properly to the north which is setback 7.45 metres from the road frontage. Whilst it is recognised that the adjoining property to the south is setback 12.68 metres, a setback of 7.5 metres provided to a Road Zone Category 1 road is considered adequate and consistent with other dwellings elsewhere in the broader streetscape.

Building Height – Complies.

Site Cover/permeability – Complies.

Energy Efficiency – Can comply. A condition on any permit will require the development to be constructed in accordance with an approved Sustainable Design Assessment.

Landscaping – Complies, a condition on any permit issued will require that appropriate landscape plans are submitted to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.


Access – Complies.

Amenity Impacts

Side and rear setbacks – Complies.

Walls on boundaries – Complies.

Daylight to existing windows/north facing windows – Complies.

Overshadowing open space – Complies.

Overlooking – Complies.

Internal views – Complies.

On-Site Amenity and Facilities

Daylight to new windows – Complies.

Private Open Space – Complies.

Solar access – Complies.

Storage – Complies.

Front fence – Complies.

4.5 General Decision Guidelines

Clause 65 of the Knox Planning Scheme and Section 60 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 set out decision guidelines/matters which the responsible authority must consider when deciding any planning application.

· The decision guidelines of Clause 65 of the Knox Planning Scheme and Section 60 of the Planning and Environment Act (1987) have been appropriately considered.

5. CONCLUSION

Clause 10.04 of the Knox Planning Scheme requires Council to balance relative policy objectives when making decisions to ensure resulting development is sustainable and achieves a net community gain. In this context, the development is appropriate given the following:

· The proposed development is generally consistent with the Housing Policy. As discussed above, the site is located within an established residential area with access to urban services.


· The design of the new dwellings is consistent with the Neighbourhood Character objectives in that the development provides an appropriate front setback, parking to the rear of the dwellings, hipped roof forms, eaves, brick finishes and adequate areas of landscaping around the dwellings, thus maintaining the landscape character of the area.

· The development is generally compliant with ResCode subject to changes that could be conditioned on any permit issued.

RECOMMENDATION

That Council issue a Notice of Decision to Grant a Planning Permit to develop the land for five (5) dwellings (three double storey and two single storey) and alteration of access to a Road Zone Category 1 at 430 Scoresby Road, Ferntree Gully subject to the following conditions:

Amended plans

1. Prior to the commencement of any buildings or works, amended plans to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority must be submitted to and approved by the Responsible Authority. When approved, the plans will be endorsed and will then form part of the permit. The plans must be drawn to scale with dimensions and three copies must be provided. The plans must be generally in accordance with the plans prepared Line Design but modified to show:

1.1 Any necessary modifications required by VicRoads conditions 19-26 (inclusive).

1.2 The door associated with Unit 4’s garage altered so it opens outwards (into the dwelling itself).

1.3 An annotation on the site plan which states “all structures (including fences, letterboxes and meters) shall be constructed to a maximum height of 900mm clear of the splay area in accordance with AS 2890.1, Clause 3.2.4. All letterboxes must face the street”.

1.4 The visitor car space located to the south of Dwelling 5’s garage delineated as being 5.4 metres in length and 2.6 metres in width.

1.5 The visitor car space located to the south of Dwelling 5’s garage signed and paved.

1.6 The finished floor level of the garage of Dwelling 5 raised to a level of 87.00 (AHD).


Recommendation (cont’d)

1.7 The finished floor level of the garage of Dwelling 2 and Dwelling 4 raised by 100-200mm (to cater for drainage).

1.8 The finished floor levels of both Dwelling 2 and Dwelling 4 raised by 100-200mm above level 87.55 (AHD).

1.9 Re-design of Dwelling 5 so that it predominantly lies outside the Tree Protection Zone (6.5 metres) of the Leyland Cypress located on the adjoining property to the west. Consequential changes are to be to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.

1.10 Drainage Plans in accordance with Condition 2.

1.11 Landscape Plans in accordance with Condition 4.

1.12 A Sustainable Design Assessment in accordance with Condition 7 of this Permit and any necessary modifications.

To the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.

Drainage plans

2. Prior to commencement of any buildings or works, three copies of drainage plans and computations must be submitted to and approved by the Responsible Authority. Construction of the drainage is to be in accordance with these plans. The plans must show the following:

2.1 All stormwater drainage discharge from the site connected to a legal point of discharge.

2.2 The internal drains of the dwellings to be independent of each other.

2.3 An on-site detention system designed by a suitably qualified Civil Engineering Consultant to ensure no net increase in stormwater discharge from the proposed development.

2.4 The on-site detention system to be installed in a suitable location for easy access and maintenance.

2.5 A suitable overland flow path for the entire site to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority. Details of the overland flow path are to be included on the plans.



2.6 All levels to be to AHD (Australian Height Datum).


3. Stormwater runoff from all buildings and hardstand surfaces shall be properly collected and discharged in a complete and effective system of drains within the property and shall not cause or create a nuisance to abutting properties.

Landscape plans

4. Prior to the commencement of any buildings or works, a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the responsible authority must be submitted to and approved by the responsible authority. When approved, the plan will be endorsed and will then form part of the permit. The plan must show:

4.1 A survey (including botanical names, height and width) of all existing vegetation to be retained and / or removed.

4.2 The identification and removal of all vegetation identified as an environmental weed in Knox (as outlined in Appendix 2 of Council’s Landscape Guidelines for Planning Permits).

4.3 Buildings and trees (including botanical names, height and width) on neighbouring properties within three metres of the boundary.

4.4 Details of the surface finishes of pathways and driveways.

4.5 Details and location of all existing and proposed services including above and below ground lines, cables and pipes.

4.6 A planting schedule of all proposed trees, shrubs and ground covers, including botanical names, common names, pot sizes, sizes at maturity, and quantities of each plant.

4.7 Landscaping and planting within all open areas of the site (including additional planting within open space areas of the existing dwelling/s).


5. Before the occupation of the development, the landscaping works shown on the endorsed plans must be carried out and completed to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.



6. The landscaping shown on the endorsed plans must be maintained to the satisfaction of the responsible authority. Any dead, diseased or damaged plants are to be replaced.

Sustainable Design Assessment

7. Prior to the commencement of any buildings or works, a Sustainable Design Assessment detailing Sustainable Design initiatives to be incorporated into the development must be submitted to and approved by the Responsible Authority. The Sustainable Design Assessment must outline the proposed sustainable design initiatives to be incorporated throughout the development such as (but not limited to) energy efficiency, water conservation, stormwater quality, waste management and material selection, to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.

8. Prior to the occupation of the development, the development must be constructed in accordance with the Sustainable Design Assessment.

Waste

9. Before the occupation of the development concrete bin pads must be constructed within the northern portion of the nature strip adjoining the site and must measure 11 metres in length and 600mm in width.

General

10. All development must be in accordance with the endorsed plans.

11. The development as shown on the endorsed plans must not be altered without the written consent of the Responsible Authority.

12. Once the development has started it must be continued and completed to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.

13. Prior to the occupation of the dwellings the development is to be completed in accordance with the endorsed plan/s to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.

14. All walls on the boundaries of adjoining properties must be cleaned and finished to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.



Car parking and Driveways

15. Before the dwellings are occupied, driveways and carparking areas must be fully constructed in accordance with plans submitted to and approved by the Responsible Authority.

16. All driveway and carparking areas as shown on the endorsed plan must be fully constructed to the minimum standard of 100mm depth of reinforced concrete and properly formed to such levels that they can be used in accordance with the plans. Construction using any alternative hardstanding sealed surface is subject to detailed plans to be submitted to and approved by the Responsible Authority.

17. Parking areas and driveways must be kept available and maintained for these purposes at all times to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.

18. Internal public lighting shall be provided to the satisfaction of the relevant authority and in accordance with AS1158. This would generally be low height or bollard type lighting to avoid spill-over into adjacent properties. It may be sensor activated, to avoid all night running costs.

VicRoads

19. Before the commencement of the permitted development, amended plans generally in accordance with the submitted plans but modified to show the following must be submitted to and approved by VicRoads. Once approved by VicRoads, the plans must be endorsed by the Responsible Authority and then form part of the permit.

19.1 The passing area widened to at least 5.5 metres for the first 7 metres into the property.

19.2 A vehicular crossover at least 5.5 metres wide, as measured at the property boundary with edges of the vehicular crossover angled at 60 degrees to the road carriageway.

20. The level of footpaths must not be lowered or altered in any way to facilitate access to the site.

21. All disused and redundant vehicle crossings must be removed and the area reinstated to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority and at no cost to VicRoads prior to the use of the works approved.



22. The crossover and driveway are to be constructed to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority and at no cost to VicRoads prior to the use of the works approved.

23. Prior to the commencement of the use of the works hereby approved, the access lanes, driveway, crossovers and associated works must be provided and available for use and be:

23.1 Formed to such levels and drained so that they can be used in accordance with the plan.

23.2 Treated with an all-weather seal or some other durable surface.

24. Driveways must be maintained in a fit and proper states so as to not compromise the ability of vehicles to enter and exit the site in safe manner or compromise operational efficient of the road or public safety (e.g. by spilling gravel onto the roadway).

25. Finish of driveways and crossovers to ensure that the roadway is not compromised by debris coming off the development once completed.

26. A corner splay or area at least 50% clear of visual obstructions extending at least 2.0 metres long x 2.5 metres deep (within the property) both sides of the vehicle crossing to ensure adequate visibility between vehicles leaving the driveway and pedestrians on the footpath of the frontage road.

Fencing

27. All costs associated with the provision of the fencing are to be borne by the owner/developer under this permit.

28. Prior to the occupancy of the development all fencing shall be in a good condition to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.



Construction Amenity

29. Upon commencement and until conclusion of the development, the developer shall ensure that the development does not adversely affect the amenity of the area in any way, including:

29.1 the appearance of building, works or materials on the land

29.2 parking of motor vehicles

29.3 transporting of materials or goods to or from the site

29.4 hours of operation

29.5 stockpiling of top soil or fill materials

29.6 air borne dust emanating from the site

29.7 noise

29.8 rubbish and litter

29.9 sediment runoff

Should the development cause undue detriment to the amenity of the area then immediate remedial measures must be undertaken to address the issue as directed by, and to the satisfaction of, the Responsible Authority.

Permit Expiry

30. This permit will expire if one of the following circumstances applies:

30.1 The development is not started within two years of the date of this permit.

30.2 The development is not completed within four years of the date of this permit.

The Responsible Authority may extend the periods referred to if a request is made in writing before the permit expires or within six months afterwards.



NOTES

Drainage Notes (to be read in conjunction with the above drainage conditions): · Applicant shall engage a certified Engineering Consultant to analyse

the site’s existing drainage to determine type and size of the Onsite Detention (OSD) system. This shall be designed in accordance with the Knox City Council (Responsible Authority) Stormwater Drainage Guidelines, (copy available on request), and approved drainage design methods specified in the current edition of Australian Rainfall and Runoff. It should be located preferably in a common area to the dwellings, and be easily accessible for maintenance.

· Applicant is to direct all stormwater drainage runoff to the North east corner of the site which represents the Legal Point of Discharge (LPD) for the property. Applicant is to verify this on site. Connect all stormwater discharge from the site to the LPD via an Onsite Detention (OSD) system. The internal drains for the dwellings are to be independent of each other.

· The total Permissible Site Discharge for the property including all dwellings is 5.1L/s to the existing Council drainage system for a 5 year ARI event.

· The development is to provide adequate clearance for the overland flow path through the property to Council’s satisfaction. Details of regarding overland flow must be included in the engineering stormwater design plans.

· The Applicant is required to use Australian Height Datum (AHD) to present levels in all future plans. Applicant must ensure that levels on the plan are accurate.

· Drainage works in the Road reserve or in the Council easement will require a road opening permit.

· Drainage system designed so as to avoid impact on any vegetation shown on the endorsed plans as being retained.

· Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) should be addressed as part of this development, e.g. water storage tanks, swale drains, etc.

Other Notes: · A building permit must be obtained before development is

commenced. · Road opening permit must be obtained before development is

commenced.



· Buildings are not allowed to be built over Council easements without Council consent.

· In accordance with Council policy, an 8.5% public open space contribution may apply in the event of the subdivision of the land.

· The dwellings must achieve a minimum 6-Star Energy Rating. · Dwelling numbers as shown on the endorsed plans do not

necessarily indicate any future street numbers. Property (street) numbering shall be in accordance with Council’s Property (Street) Numbering Policy. Information regarding this can be obtained from Council’s Property and Revenue Services Department on 9298 8215.

· All litter and rubbish associated with the construction must be contained on site at all times.

VicRoads: · Should you have any enquiries regarding this matter, please contact

Yoga Yogaparan on 9881 8771 or [email protected]

COUNCIL RESOLUTION MOVED: CR. COOPER SECONDED: CR. LOCKWOOD That the recommendation be adopted. CARRIED

Date post:	26-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	8 times
Download:	0 times

KNOX CITY COUNCIL€¦ · Proposed Rezoning Of Council Property – 7 Church Street, Bayswater...

Documents