1
KOREAKOREA’’ss PPP and ExPPP and Ex--Post ManagementPost Management
Bong Hwan CHO
Director, PPI Planning DivisionMinistry of Strategy and Finance
Republic of Korea
2
Ⅰ Introduction of PPP in KoreaIntroduction of PPP in Korea
Ⅱ Performance of PPPPerformance of PPP
Ⅲ Ex-post Management of PPPEx-post Management of PPP
Contents
4
(1) History of PPP Act
- Individual Laws
- PPI Act Enactment
- PPI Act Revision (Risk Sharing)
- PPI Act Amendment (BTL)
Dec. 1998Dec. 1998
Jan. 2005Jan. 2005
Before Aug. 1994Before Aug. 1994
Aug. 1994Aug. 1994
Ⅰ. Introduction of PPP in Korea
5
(2) Available Project Types
◦ Available project types : BTO, BOT, BOO, and BTL - BTO and BTL are most popular
-
-
BTOBTORoad, Port, Rail, etc
User Fees, Demand Risk
School, Sewer Pipe, Military Residence, etc
Gov’t Payment, No Demand RiskBTLBTL
Ⅰ. Introduction of PPP in Korea
6
(3) Available Facility Types◦ 44 Types of Infrastructure Facilities in 15 Categories
Ⅰ. Introduction of PPP in Korea
Road(3)
Port(2)
Rail(3)
Welfare(3)
Forestry(2)
Energy(3)
WaterResources
(3)
Communication(4)
Environment(5) Logistics
(3)
15 Categories Education(1)
Military Housing(1)
Culture & Tourism(9)
PublicHousing
(1)
* Positive listing
Airport(1)
7
(4) Major Provisions of Gov’t Support (BTO Type)
① Construction Subsidy : 30~50% of Total Investment
∙ Roads : Less than 30% of Total Investment
∙ Rails : Less than 50% of Total Investment
∙ Ports : Less than 30% of Total Investment
∙ Freight Terminals : No Construction Subsidy (BOO type)
* Government provides access roads and rails
Ⅰ. Introduction of PPP in Korea
8
② MRG on Solicited Projects- Minimum Revenue Guarantee∙ Adopted after Financial Crisis of late 90s→ Induced Private Investment in Infrastructure
- No MRG for projects with < 50% of forecasted revenue
- Led to Inflated demand forecasting
→ Resulted in Increase of MRG SubsidyReduced Level of MRG for Solicited projects & Abolished for Unsolicited projects (2006)
Ⅰ. Introduction of PPP in Korea
9
③ Various Tax Benefits
- Exemption of Acquisition and Registration Tax
- Application of 0% Tax Rate on VAT- 15% Separate Taxation on Interest Income
from Infra Bond- Separate Taxation on Dividend Income from Infra Fund
④ Concession Termination Payment
Force Majeure, Bankruptcy
Ⅰ. Introduction of PPP in Korea
11
(1) Complement to Public Investment→ Early Delivery of Infrastructure Facilities
’95~’97 ’98 ’99 ’00 ’01 ’02
24.7 12.7 14.3 15.2 16.0 16.0 18.4 17.4 18.3 18.4
0.3
1.2
0.5
3.9
0.8
5.6
1.0
6.6
0.6 1.21.7
2.6 3.2
3.8
7.5
1.2
6.5
9.8
17.4
’03 ’04 ’05 ’06
14.2Government Investment (A)Private Investment (B)Share of Private Investment (B/A, %)
Ⅱ. Performance of PPP
12
Total Investment in BTO (’07.12)Total Investment in BTO (’07.12)
90%
10%
Local projects 4.5 Trillion KRW
(89 projects)
National projects41.7 Trillion KRW
(61 projects)
Total investment : 46.2 Trillion KRW (50 projects)
Ⅱ. Performance of PPP
13
51%
15%
34%
Operation65 projectsPreparation
28 projects
Construction96 projects
Total Investment in BTLTotal Investment in BTL
Total investment announced : 16.5 Trillion KRW (290 projects)
Ⅱ. Performance of PPP
14
(2) Introduction of Efficiency and Creativity of Private Sector to Infrastructure Investment
→ Increases Value for Money on InvestmentCompared to Fiscal Expenditure Projects
PPP Projects Reduce Construction Period
PPP Projects Reduce Project Operation Expense
PPP Projects Reduce Total Project Cost
PPP Projects Revitalize Korean Financial Industry
Ⅱ. Performance of PPP
15
Diversification of Financial Instrument
◦ Better Project Management Skills and Financing Mechanisms
* Secured Loans backed by Collateral → Lending based on Project Cash Flow
◦ Introduction of Infrastructure Fund* 10 Infra fund on the market (Invested amt : 3.4 trillion)
∙ Indirect Investment in PPI Projects∙ Long-term Investment Opportunity ∙ Domestic and Foreign investors in Infrastructure
Ⅱ. Performance of PPP
16
(3) Competition in PPP
◦ Getting More Competitive
* Average Bidding Rate
1.2 (’01) → 1.3 (’03) → 1.8 (’04) → 3.0 (’05) → 3.5 (’07)
◦ Competition → Increase Efficiency and Creativity
◦ Mechanisms for More Competition :
- Simplify Required Documents for Proposal (’05)
- Compensation on Project Preparation Cost (’07)
Ⅱ. Performance of PPP
18
① Re-financing
② Re-negotiation
③ Performance Management
④ Integrated Operation System
⑤ Strengthening Auditing Procedures
Methods of Ex-post Management
Ⅲ. Ex-Post Management of PPP
19
① Re-financing
- Why?∙ Changes in Market Environment (ex. Interest Rates)∙ Construction Risk reduced (lower equity ratio & interest rate)
- How?∙ Establishment of Re-financing Guideline (’07.12) ∙ Concessionaire → Competent Authority → PIMAC →MOSF
- What?∙ Profit Sharing : Reduce MRG and Toll Fees
Ⅲ. Ex-Post Management of PPP
Why?
How?
What?
20
Re-financing Examples
- Re-financed Projects∙ Incheon Airport International Expressway (MRG 90% → 80%)∙ Cheonan ~ Nonsan Expressway (MRG 90% → 82%)
- Re-financing in Progress∙ Daegu-Busan Expressway (Toll Fee and MRG ↓)∙ Seoul Metropolitan Outer-Ring Expressway (Toll Fee and MRG ↓)
Ⅲ. Ex-Post Management of PPP
21
② Re-negotiation- Why?∙ Changes in Business Environment (ex. Costs)
- How?∙ Concessionaire → Competent Authority → PIMAC →MOSF
- What?∙ Changes of Contract Terms : Adjust User Charges, Concession Period (including Termination) or Provide Subsidies to Concessionaire
- Examples∙ Re-negotiated Project : Ehwaryung Tunnel (Terminated)∙ Project under Consideration : Mokpo New Port (MRG)
Ⅲ. Ex-Post Management of PPP
Why?
How?
What?
Examples
22
③ Performance Management- Why?∙ Better and Stable Services and Facilities
- How?∙ BTL : Performance Evaluation System in Progress
Development of Standard Operational Model by Sector∙ BTO : Post Evaluation System under Consideration
- What?∙ BTL : Evaluation on Availability/Safety&Durability/Service
Satisfaction by Performance Evaluation Committee→ Adjustment of Gov’t Payments (Lease + Operating Costs)
∙ BTO : Service Quality Survey → Incentive/Penalty for Better Performance
Ⅲ. Ex-Post Management of PPP
Why?
How?
What?
23
④ Integrated Operation System
- Why?∙ Economy of Size ∙ Lower Operation Cost∙More Efficient and Effective Management
- How?∙ Integrate Operation System for PPP Roads or Schools
- What?∙Maintenance, User Charge Collection System (Toll Booth)
Ⅲ. Ex-Post Management of PPP
Why?
How?
What?
24
⑤ Strengthening Auditing Procedures
- Why?∙ Better Management and Operation (ex. Deficits)
∙ Enforcement of Mandatory Requirements (ex. Equity Rate)
- How?∙Mandatory Reporting of Audit, Compliance Reports to MOSF
∙ Administrative Penalties
Ⅲ. Ex-Post Management of PPP
Why?
How?
25
(2) Improve Quality of Facility and Services Provided
Rational Selection
Strengthen Feasibility Test
Transparent Management
Performance Evaluation
•Reduce Expenditure •Innovation and Efficiency
•Improve VFM Test and Feasibility for PPP Projects
•Constant development of Guidelines and Standard Models
•Everyone is Happy!
Ⅲ. Ex-Post Management of PPP
26
Closing Remarks
- Private Sector : Competition in Good Faith, Creative Ideas, Participation in Long-term Perspective
- Public Sector : Continuous improvement on PPP policies, Deregulation, More Competition, Ex-Post Management
Success of Public-Private Partnerships