Date post: | 21-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Kra
kow
20
10
Galactic magnetic fields:
MRI or SN-driven dynamo?
Detlef Elstner
Oliver Gressel
Natali Dziourkevich
Alfio Bonanno
Günther Rüdiger
Kra
kow
20
10
Magnetic field amplificationDynamos by SN-driven turbulence are numerically feasible
Box models: cosmic ray injection (Hanasz et al. 2004) thermal energy input (Gressel et al. 2008)
Global models: mean field models ( ………. since 1960 ) artificial velocities (Gissinger et al. 2008) cosmic ray injection by SN (Hanasz et al.2009)
Kra
kow
20
10
SN driven dynamo• SN energy is injected by thermal energy explosions • State of the art simulations of the ISM with heating, cooling• Wind or fountain flow develops (essential for helicity transport)• Clustering is essential
Kra
kow
20
10
SN-driven dynamoHow it works: downward pumping equalupward fountain flow
pumping acts only onthe mean field
fountain flow transports all the magnetic field
Zur Anzeige wird der QuickTime™ Dekompressor „TIFF (LZW)“
benötigt.
Zur Anzeige wird der QuickTime™ Dekompressor „TIFF (LZW)“
benötigt.
Zur Anzeige wird der QuickTime™ Dekompressor „TIFF (LZW)“
benötigt.
Zur Anzeige wird der QuickTime™ Dekompressor „TIFF (LZW)“
benötigt.
Kra
kow
20
10
SN driven dynamo
Omega dependence
0.6
Kra
kow
20
10
Dependence of turbulence on SN-rate
~ 3(/0)1/2
r ~ 6(/0)1/2
~ 2(/0)1/2
For 0.01 < /0 < 1
uz ~ 15 (/0)0.4 z
Kra
kow
20
10
Dependence of turbulence on SN-rateC ~ H C ~ 3/2H2 -1/2
Dynamo number: D ~ 5/2 H3 -1/2
Pitch angle: P ~ -1/2H-1 1/2
Cpum ~ -1/2H Cw ~ -1/2
Regular field decreases with increasing SF
Pitch angle increases
Kra
kow
20
10
Energy densities in NGC6946(Beck 2007)
Cold clouds:Cold clouds:
VVturbturb = 7 km/s, T=50 K, = 7 km/s, T=50 K,
H=100 pc H=100 pc Ionized gas: Ionized gas:
T=10T=1044 K, f K, fvv=0.05, H=1 kpc=0.05, H=1 kpc
=0.1 =0.2 D=0.06
but Ereg=0.3
=0.1 =0.2 D=0.06
but Ereg=0.3
Kra
kow
20
10
SN driven dynamoRotation curve with small turnover radius have high C
models observed
Radial extend: up to =25 more far out
Size of pitch angle: to small up to 35
Radial profile pitch angle: constant decreasing
Kra
kow
20
10
SN-driven dynamoMean field model:
No fountain flow, No pumping
Growth time: 0.7 Gys
Final field strength: Br = 0.6 Beq
B= 20 Beq
Pitch angle: 10
Kra
kow
20
10
SN-driven dynamoMean field model: Growth time: 0.25 Gys
Final field strength: Br = 0.3 Beq
B= 1.1 Beq
Pitch angle: 160
Kra
kow
20
10
SN-driven dynamo
Kra
kow
20
10
Increasing scale-height Mean field model:
m7a4b2i 174 Increase of scale height
Growth time: 0.7 Gys
Final field strength: Br = 0.6 Beq
B= 20 Beq
D ~ 5/2 H3 -1/2D ~ 5/2 H3 -1/2
P ~ -1/2H-1 1/2P ~ -1/2H-1 1/2
Kra
kow
20
10
Central dominated wind
Kra
kow
20
10
SN-driven dynamoMean field model:
Sr5tt2a-pol.avi
Growth time: 0.7 Gys
Final field strength:
Zur Anzeige wird der QuickTime™ Dekompressor „“
benötigt.
Kra
kow
20
10
SN driven dynamoField regularity as IR based star formation rate for NGC 4254
(Chyzy 2008)
log (Breg: Btur) =
−0.32 (±0.01) log SFR
−0.90 (±0.03)
From simulations we get
−0.38 (±0.01)
Kra
kow
20
10
Magnetic field amplificationMagnetic instabilities as source for the dynamo
- Parker instability (may be with cosmic ray support) - Tayler instability ( for strong fields in the outer parts)
- Magneto rotational instability (in low starforming regions )
difficult to see a strong amplification, because of small scales for weak fields.
Kra
kow
20
10
Magneto-rotational instabilityLimits for MRI by other sources of turbulence: Kitchatinov et al. (2004)
0.7 /H < va < 0H ----> 0.7 < C = 0 H2/
0.7 < S < C
for turbulent : 100 - 3 G > B > 0.5 G (observed above the disk)
Kra
kow
20
10
MRI
nt3nt3
Disk field at 1.6 GysDisk field at 1.6 Gys Polarisation at 1.6 GysPolarisation at 1.6 Gys
Kra
kow
20
10
MRI
nt5nt5
512x256x128
time 2.8 Gys
growth time 0.9 Gys
Efinal/Einit=24
1<r<10
-5< z < 5
Zur Anzeige wird der QuickTime™ Dekompressor „“
benötigt.
Kra
kow
20
10
MRI growth only linearly?
0.170.17 0.0350.035
Kra
kow
20
10
MRI: dynamo or primordial field ? Total magnetic energy growth is ~ t2
potential for large large pitch angle
but for maximal fields only ? smooth polarisation maps halo fields are strong Strong fields in the outer parts without starformation
Kra
kow
20
10
Dynamos have to explain Pitch angle right size and profile (for real rotation curve) MRI ? Turbulent field scales with starformation Regular component is independent of starformation Field geometry (also MRI but is it consistent with RM ?) Strong fields in the outer parts and halo MRI ? Fast growth
Kra
kow
20
10
SummaryMRI during disk formation in a uniform vertical field
large pitch angle, smooth PM
dynamic influence on the gas disk
fast growth time of the unstable mode 2/ < 100Mys
Dynamo ?
SN driven turbulent dynamo
needs star formation and strong rotation
pitch angle up to 20o for galactic values
growth time of order 100Mys
Kra
kow
20
10
Outlook Role of cosmic rays for the SN driven dynamo New insight from LOFAR for halo magnetic fields Combined models with SN-dynamo and MRI Other sources of turbulence in the outer part for a dynamo Strong field dynamos Magnetic instabilities for more complicated field configurations Galaxy formation models magnetic fields in dwarf galaxies
Kra
kow
20
10
Thank you!