+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Kriti Aggarwal

Kriti Aggarwal

Date post: 26-Oct-2014
Category:
Upload: harshbwn
View: 131 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
98
Summer Internship Report On CREDIT APPRAISAL OF CORPORATE LOANS AT PNB Presented By: Kriti Agarwal, BM-A002 Company Guide: Faculty Guide: Mr. Rohit Grover Dr. Vrinda Kamat (Chief Manager-Credit) Prog. Chairperson (MBA BM) Date: 9/6/2012
Transcript
Page 1: Kriti Aggarwal

Summer Internship ReportOn

Presented By: Kriti Agarwal, BM-A002

Company Guide: Faculty Guide:

Mr. Rohit Grover Dr. Vrinda Kamat

(Chief Manager-Credit) Prog. Chairperson (MBA BM)

Date: 9/6/2012

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Page 2: Kriti Aggarwal

Every work involves efforts and inputs of various kinds and people. I am thankful to all those

people who have been helpful enough to me to the extent of their being instrumental in the

completion and accomplishment of the project entitled “Credit Appraisal of Corporate

Loans at PNB”.

I sincerely acknowledge with deep sense of gratitude to my project guide, Mr. Rohit Grover

(Chief Manager, Credit), PNB Circle Office for enhancing my understanding of the subject

and enabling me to appreciate finer nuances of the subject.

I extend my sincere gratitude to Mr. Manoj Kukreja (Senior Manager, Credit), and the

entire Credit Department for their help and guidance, without which the completion of this

project would have been extremely difficult.

I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to faculty guide, Dr. Vrinda Kamat for the

continuous, creative, valuable and informative support extended to me, without which the

project would not have been efficiently completed.

Lastly, I would like to thank Mr.D.S.Sharma (Chief Manager, HR) as he found me credible

enough to work for PNB and selected me for challenging project.

Page 3: Kriti Aggarwal

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgment (i)

List of Tables & Figures (ii)

Summary (iii)

INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................7

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY.........................................................................................................7

SCOPE OF STUDY..........................................................................................................................8

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY.....................................................................................................9

SOURCES AND METHODS.........................................................................................................10

INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS...................................................................................................................................11

OVERVIEW OF BANKING INDUSTRY......................................................................................11

COMPANY BACKGROUND........................................................................................................14

PNB’s MISSION AND VISION.....................................................................................................15

PRODUCTS and SERVICES..........................................................................................................16

ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE..............................................................................................17

MAIN TEXT..........................................................................................................................................................18

WHAT IS A LOAN?.......................................................................................................................18

CREDIT APPRAISAL....................................................................................................................23

CREDIT APPRAISAL PROCESS AT PNB...................................................................................25

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT...................................................................................................26

SME.................................................................................................................................................32

FINANCIAL RATIOS....................................................................................................................36

ASSESSMENT OF WORKING CAPITAL....................................................................................38

PRE SANCTION APPRAISAL......................................................................................................40

POST SANCTION AND FOLLOW UP OF LOANS.....................................................................44

CASE ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................................................46

ACTIVITY SHEET.........................................................................................................................47

FINANCIALS of Disha Engg..........................................................................................................50

BRIEF DISCUSSION on Financial Indicators:...............................................................................53

SECURITY.....................................................................................................................................56

POSITION OF ACCOUNTS...........................................................................................................58

PRICING.........................................................................................................................................60

Page 4: Kriti Aggarwal

JUSTIFICATION............................................................................................................................61

Calculation of Working Capital by MPBF.......................................................................................64

Calculation of Financial Ratios........................................................................................................65

RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................................................67

CONCLUSION......................................................................................................................................................68

REFERENCES.....................................................................................................................................................69

Page 5: Kriti Aggarwal

LIST OF TABLES & FIGURES

Tables

Table 1.1: Performance of public, private and foreign banks 11

Table 1.2: Net income and CAGR of public and private banks 12

Table 1.3: ROA and CAR of public and private banks 13

Table 3.1: Credit Risk Rating Models 29

Table 3.2: Weightage under various Risk Areas 30

Table 3.3: Rating Score, Category & Risk Indicators 31

Table 3.4: Restrictions on Loaning Powers 32

Table 3.5: Classification of Enterprises 33

Table 3.6: Credit Exposure Ceiling 35

Table 3.7: Ratios & their Significance 37

Figures

Figure 2.1: Organisational Structure 17

Figure 3.1: Classification of Corporate Loans 19

Figure 3.2: Working Capital Cycle 20

Figure 3.3: Cash Conversion Cycle 21

Figure 3.4: Credit Appraisal Process 26

Page 6: Kriti Aggarwal

SUMMARY

The project on credit appraisal of corporate loans was done at Punjab National Bank. It is one of the leading banks in India that is engaged in various banking services. Credit appraisal is one of the major activities performed at the bank. It is an investigation/assessment done by the bank prior to providing any loans & advances. It is done to evaluate the credit worthiness of a borrower. This project also covers what a loan is and why loans are undertaken. Loan is a type of debt. It is generally provided at a cost, referred to as interest on the debt, which provides an incentive for the lender to engage in the loan. There are two types of loans- Personal and Corporate loans. And corporate loans can be either for day to day needs i.e. for working capital purposes or for purchase of fixed assets i.e. term loans.For calculation of working capital two methods are proposed:

1. Under Nayak committee, known as the Turnover Method and 2. Under Tondon Committee, known as MPBF method.

The credit appraisals for any organization basically follow these steps: Assessment of credit need, financial statement analysis, and financial ratios of the company, credit rating, working capital requirement, term loan analysis, submission of documents, NPA classification and recovery. The main aim of research is to find out the truth which is hidden and which has not been discovered as yet. Though each research study has its own Specific purpose, we may think of following broad categories:  To gain familiarity with a phenomenon or to achieve new insights into it. To portray accurately the characteristics of a particular individual, Situation or a group. To determine the frequency with which something occurs or with which it is associated

with something else.

It further gives an overview of credit exposure ceiling by the banks, the credit risk it faces and how bank performs credit risk rating for various proposals it receives. Credit risk is the risk that borrower might fail to meet its obligation towards the bank in accordance with the agreed terms and conditions of sanction. Further rating is done based on the amount of credit risk. Bank’s exposure in case of low rated accounts and industries faces certain restrictions.

It is a way to systematically solve the research problem. It may be understood as a science of studying how research is done scientifically. In it we study the various steps that are generally adopted by a researcher in studying his research problem along with the logic behind them explaining the pre sanction and post sanction process.

With the help of case study we analyze the credit appraisal process, post sanction steps, calculation of ratios, its analysis and justification.

Page 7: Kriti Aggarwal

INTRODUCTION

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of study is to study and analyze the various aspects of financing the

projects of the borrowers which are beyond the powers of the branches and within the

ambit of the Circle Office of Punjab National Bank.

This study covers the process followed by Punjab National Bank to assess the credit

worthiness of its clients and grant the finance for the setting up or expansion of their

projects.

Identify various parameter on basis of which credit appraisal is conducted, reasons for choosing these parameter and to identify how scores are given against each of these parameter.

To study the procedure adopted in evaluating credit proposal by using case analysis.

To understand the basis of credit risk rating and its significance. This would entail

undertaking of the following procedures:

a. Management Evaluation

b. Business / Industry Evaluation

c. Technical Evaluation

d. Legal Evaluation

e. Financial Evaluation

f. Credit Risk Rating

Page 8: Kriti Aggarwal

SCOPE OF STUDY

The Credit appraisal is a holistic exercise which starts from the time a prospective borrower walks into the branch and culminates in credit delivery and monitoring with the objective of ensuring and maintaining the quality of lending and managing credit risk.The process of Credit Appraisal is multidimensional and includes- Management Appraisal, Technical Appraisal, Commercial Appraisal, Financial Appraisal and Economic Appraisal.

The Credit Policy of Banks has undergone changes to cope with the environmental changes, tap the available opportunities, achieve their commercial objective, fulfill social obligations and adhere to mandatory directed lending norms. The credit policy consists of both fund based credit exposure and non fund based credit exposure.The credit policy is studied under – Coverage, Clientele, Marketing. This segmented approach is expected to provide both market and customer focus for ensuring better business development, better development of expertise and better customer satisfaction.

Page 9: Kriti Aggarwal

LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

Like any other study this study too is not free from limitations. The major limitations of the

study are listed below:

1. The major limitation of this study shall be data availability as the data is proprietary

and not readily shared for dissemination.

2. Also the geographical scope of the project was limited to PNB Circle Office and the

loans studied were solely of businesses established majorly in NCR.

3. Due to ever changing environment, many risks are unexpected and the remedial

measures available are based on general experience from the past. Therefore risks can

only be minimized cannot be erased completely. Hence, out of the various ways in

which risks can be managed, none of the methods is perfect and may be very diverse

even for the work in a similar situation in the future.

Page 10: Kriti Aggarwal

SOURCES AND METHODS

TOOLS OF DATA COLLECTION:

I. Primary sources of Information

Meetings and discussion with the Chief Manager and the Senior Manager of both

Credit and Credit Risk Management Department.

II. Secondary sources of Information

Loan Policy and Internal Circulars of the bank

Research papers, power point presentations and PDF files prepared by the bank and

its related officials

Past and Present Financial Statements:

i. Balance Sheet

ii. Profitability Statements

Projected Financial Statements

CMA data i.e. Credit Monetary Arrangement data which includes the following 6

forms:

i. Particulars of existing/proposed limits for banking system

ii. Operating Statement

iii. Analysis of Balance Sheet

iv. Comparative Statement of current assets and current liabilities

v. Computation of MPBF

vi. Funds Flow Statement

Page 11: Kriti Aggarwal

INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS

OVERVIEW OF BANKING INDUSTRY

RBI has taken a few important steps to make the Indian Banking industry more robust and healthy. This includes de-regulation of savings rate, guidelines for new banking licenses and implementation of Basel Norm III. Since March 2002, Bankex (Index tracking the performance of leading banking sector stocks) has grown at a compounded annual rate of about 31%. After a very successful decade, a new era seems to have started for the Indian Banking Industry. According to a Mckinsey report, the Indian banking sector is heading towards being a high-performing sector.

According to an IBA-FICCI-BCG report titled ‘Being five star in productivity – road map for

excellence in Indian banking’, India’s gross domestic product (GDP) growth will make the

Indian banking industry the third largest in the world by 2025. According to the report, the

domestic banking industry is set for an exponential growth in coming years with its assets

size poised to touch USD 28,500 billion by the turn of the 2025 from the current asset size of

USD 1,350 billion (2010)”. So, before going in its future, let’s have a glance at its historical

performance.

Table 1.1: Performance of public, private and foreign banks

In the last 5 years, foreign and private sector banks have earned significantly higher return on total assets as compared to their pubic peers. If we look at its trend, foreign banks show an overall decreasing trend, private banks an increasing trend and Public banks have been more

Page 12: Kriti Aggarwal

or less stagnant. The net NPA of public sector bank was also significantly higher than that of private and foreign banks at the end of FY11, which indicates the asset quality of public banks is comparatively poor. The Capital Adequacy ratio was also very high for private and foreign bank as compared to public banks.

In conclusion, we could say that the current position of ROA, Net NPA and CAR of different kinds of players in the industry indicates that going ahead, public banks will have to face relatively more problems as compared to private and foreign banks.

After looking at industry performance, let’s see how the different players in the Banking Industry have performed in the last five years.

Table 1.2: Net income and CAGR of public and private banks

The table above indicates that overall the top private banks have grown faster than that of public banks. Axis Bank, one of the new private sector bank, has shown the highest growth in all parameters i.e. net interest income, deposits, advances, total assets and book value. Among public sector banks, Bank of Baroda has been the outperformer in the last five years.

Page 13: Kriti Aggarwal

Table 1.3: ROA and CAR of public and private banks

Kotak Mahindra Bank has reported the highest 5-year average net interest margin and currently, it also has the highest CAR whereas HDFC Bank has the highest CASA, the lowest net NPA to net advances ratio and the highest five-year-average ROA. On the other hand, India’s largest bank, SBI reported the lowest five-year-average ROA. Currently, it has the highest net NPA to net advances ratio and the lowest CAR.

Looking at all of the above, it is expected that Private Banks are better placed to garner growth in the Indian Banking Industry.

Page 14: Kriti Aggarwal

COMPANY BACKGROUND

About Punjab National Bank

Punjab National Bank (PNB) was set up in 1895 in Lahore - and has the distinction of being

the first Indian bank to have been started solely with Indian capital. The bank was

nationalized in July 1969 along with 13 other banks. Today, PNB is a professionally managed

bank with a successful track record of over 110 years.

Punjab National Bank is the 3rd largest bank in India. It is the first entirely Indian bank.

Today it serves over 37 million customers with total assets of $60 billion. It has a total of

around 5000 branches in around 764 cities with branches in Hong Kong, Dubai, Kabul and

UK also. It is among the Big Five Banks of India others being State Bank Of India, ICICI

Bank, Bank of Baroda and Canara Bank respectively.

Punjab national bank is number one amongst the national banks and the second largest

public sector bank in the country. It is the third biggest bank in terms of asset size among

commercial banks. With a countrywide presence of over 5,000 branches, PNB has a strong

deposit and credit base.

The bank has developed a relatively strong franchise over the years, servicing both the

corporate and retail sector and offering a wide variety of banking services, which include

corporate and personal banking, industrial finance, agricultural finance financing of trade

and industrial banking. Among the banks client are multinational companies, Indian

conglomerates, medium and small industrial units, exporters and non-resident Indian etc.

Page 15: Kriti Aggarwal

PNB’s MISSION AND VISION

MISSION

"Banking for the unbanked”

VISION

"To be a Leading Global Bank with Pan India footprints and become a household

brand in the Indo-Gangetic Plains providing entire range of financial products and

services under one roof"

PNB’s VISION - 2013

10,00,000 crores business

15,00,00,000 crores customers

Page 16: Kriti Aggarwal

PRODUCTS and SERVICES

Savings Fund Account- Total Freedom Salary Account, PNB Prudent Sweep, PNB

Vidyarthi SF Account, PNB Mitra SF Account

Current Account- PNB Vaibhav, PNB Gaurav, PNB Smart Roamer Account

Fixed Deposit Schemes- Spectrum Fixed Deposit Scheme, Anupam Account,

multi /benefit Deposit Scheme

Credit Schemes- Flexible Housing Loan, Car Finance, Personal Loan, Credit Cards

Social Banking- Mahila Udyam Nidhi Scheme, Krishi Card, PNB Farmers’ Welfare

Trust

Corporate Banking- Gold Card Scheme for exporters, EXIM Finance

Business Sector- PNB Karigar Credit Card, PNB Kushal Udhami, PNB Pragati

Udhami, PNB Vikas Udhami

Apart from these, the PNB also offers locker facilities, senior citizens schemes, PPF

schemes and various E-services.

Page 17: Kriti Aggarwal

ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE

Figure 2.1: Organisational Structure

HEAD OFFICE

CIRCLE OFFICE

BRANCH OFFICE

Page 18: Kriti Aggarwal

MAIN TEXT

WHAT IS A LOAN ?

A loan is a type of debt. Like all debt instruments, a loan entails the redistribution of financial assets over time, between the lender and the borrower.

The loan is generally provided at a cost, referred to as interest on the debt, which provides an incentive for the lender to engage in the loan. In a legal loan, each of these obligations and restrictions is enforced by contract, which can also place the borrower under additional restrictions known as loan covenants.

Acting as a provider of loans is one of the principal tasks for financial institutions like banks. For other institutions, issuing of debt contracts such as bonds is a typical source of funding. Loans can be subcategorized according to whether the debtor is an individual person (consumer) or a business.

CLASSIFICATION OF LOANS:

1. PERSONAL LOAN

Consumer loan is granted for personal (medical), family (education), or household (extension, repairs, purchase of air conditioner, computer, refrigerator, etc.), use as opposed to business or commercial use. These loans are either unsecured, or secured by the asset purchased or by a co-signor (guarantor).

Unsecured loans (called signature loans) are advanced on the basis of the borrower's credit-history and ability the loan from personal income. Repayment is usually through fixed amount installments over a fixed term.

2. BUSINESS LOAN

A business loan is funding given to business by a bank, an individual(s), or an organization usually to be repaid by a certain date with a certain amount of interest. The amount of a loan, the amount of interest, the repayment date, the qualification of the loan recipient to merit the loan, the credit analysis, and the number of lenders used to achieve the desired loan amount are all variable. 

The bank finances the project of the borrower by assessing the various kinds of risks borne by the bank. In financing a project, a bank is exposed to various risks like financial, business, management, basic borrower’s risk etc. It is important that the bank assesses these risks properly so as to avoid bad advances or NPAs. The amount of interest charged by the bank varies with the quantum of risk the bank is exposed to, by financing the project. The higher the exposure of the bank, higher will be the rate of interest charged by it.

Page 19: Kriti Aggarwal

Figure 3.1: Classification of Corporate Loans

a) WORKING CAPITAL: Working capital for any unit means the total amount of

circulating funds required for meeting day to day requirements of the unit.

The manufacturing unit needs a specific level of current assets such as raw material, stock

in process, finished goods, receivables and other current assets such as cash in hand/ bank

and advances etc. So the working capital means the funds invested in current assets.

The trading units need the working capital for storing the goods and allowing credit to its

customers.

The service units need the working capital for meeting the expenditure, for making advance

payments to its staff and providing credit to its customers. Thus, all type of units whether in

manufacturing or trading or service sector need the working capital.

Gross Working Capital and Net Working capital: Working capital may also be explained

as gross working capital and net working capital. Gross working capital means the total funds

required for financing the total current assets. Net Working capital means the difference of

current assets and liabilities. It denotes the portion of gross working capital contributed from

long term sources.

Corporate Loans

Working Capital

Fund Based

Cash Credit

Bills Finance

Non Fund Based

Letter of Credit

Bank Guarantee

Term Loan

Page 20: Kriti Aggarwal

Working Capital = Current Assets

Net Working Capital = Current Assets − Current Liabilities

As per practice of Indian banks, net working capital should normally be 25% of total current

assets which will give a current ratio of 1.33:1. When net working capital is negative, it

implies that the short term funds have been diverted / used for long term uses and the unit is

facing a liquidity crunch. Such situation may also arise due to losses. In such a situation, the

need of the hour is for raising long term sources.

Working capital Cycle:

The working capital cycle or operating cycle of a manufacturing unit means the time taken

for converting cash into cash via raw material, stock in process, finished goods and

receivables. So the time taken for storage of raw material, its conversion into finished

products, the time taken to keep the finished product before it is sold and the time taken in

realization from the customers all added together make the length of working capital cycle. It

is described in terms of number of days or months.

Figure 3.2: Working Capital Cycle

Page 21: Kriti Aggarwal

Figure 3.3: Cash Conversion Cycle

Working Capital Finance are broadly categorised under two heads:

i) Fund Based: These are the facilities for which the bank provides funding and

assistance to actually purchase business assets or to meet business expenses.

The Cash credit is made by the bank to finance the working capital needs of

the business. These working capital needs of the business vary from business

to business because of various factors like nature of the business, size of the

business, the length of the operating cycle, the state of the economy in which

the business is functioning etc. These fund based facilities are extended by the

bank in return of interest on the amount of funds lent. The interest, so charged

by the bank is directly proportional to the risk involved in financing that

project.

Bills Finance: Advances against inland bills are sanctioned in the form of

limits for purchase of bills (ODD) or discount of bills (BD) or bills sent for

collection (ABC) to borrowers for their genuine trade transactions. Bills are

either payable on demand or after usance period. Demand bills which are

STOCK IN PROCESS

RAW MATERIALS

CASH

FINISHED GOODS

RECEIVABLES

Page 22: Kriti Aggarwal

payable on demand or at site are purchased from the parties who are

sanctioned ODD limits and usance bills which are payable on maturity after

certain period of time as per terms of contract are discounted for parties who

are sanctioned BD limits.

ii) Non Fund Based: These are the facilities for which the bank can issue letters of

credit or can give a guarantee on behalf of the customer to the suppliers, Government

Departments for the procurement of goods and services on credit.

Letter of Credit (LC) -A letter of credit is granted by the bank to its

borrowers who purchase raw material, machinery etc against commission, in

favor of seller. The payment is made by the bank as per the terms and

conditions mentioned in the letter of credit on behalf of the borrower.

Bank Guarantee-A Bank guarantee is a non- fund based facility extended by

the bank. This helps the business to show its credit worthiness to various

parties like vendors of fixed assets, suppliers of raw material etc. Bank

Guarantee assures these parties that in case of default in payment by the

business, the bank will pay their dues. A bank guarantee is given by the banks

to their credit worthy borrowers against commission and the liability of the

bank arises only in case of default by the borrower.

b) TERM LOAN: These are made by the banks in order to finance the fixed assets of

the borrower. These loans are granted for a fixed period exceeding one year & is repayable in

installments according to a schedule of repayment extending beyond three years it is

commonly known as term loan. This loan is granted for purchase of fixed assets & is usually

allowed against hypothecation mortgage of movables/immovable assets.

Bankers tend to classify term loans into two categories:

Intermediate-term loans. Usually running less than three years, these loans are

generally repaid in monthly instalments (sometimes with balloon payments) from a

business's cash flow. According to the American Bankers Association, repayment is

often tied directly to the useful life of the asset being financed. In PNB it is also

known as short term loans.

Page 23: Kriti Aggarwal

Long-term loans. These loans are commonly set for more than three years. Most are

between 3 and 10 years, and some run for as long as 20 years. Long-term loans are

collateralized by a business's assets and typically require quarterly or monthly

payments derived from profits or cash flow.

Term loan is normally extended to finance the acquisition of fixed assets. It is generally

sanctioned for the following purposes:

For setting up of new industrial units

For expansion of an existing unit

Modernization of existing unit, Diversification into different product lines

Restructuring of existing units

For backward integration i.e. for manufacturing certain products which are being used

as raw material by existing units.

For forward integration i.e. for manufacturing certain products of existing unit as raw

material.

Page 24: Kriti Aggarwal

CREDIT APPRAISAL

Credit appraisal is an investigation/assessment done by the bank prior to providing any

loans & advances. It involves checking the commercial, financial & technical viability of the

project proposed its funding pattern & further checks the primary & collateral security cover

available for recovery of such funds.

The objective is to understand, measure and manage the credit risk and aims at ensuring

sustained growth of healthy loan portfolio while dispensing the credit and managing the risk.

It is generally carried out by the financial institutions which are involved in providing

financial funding to its customers. The credit managers of banks and Non Banking Finance

Companies (NBFCs) are duty bound to accept or reject a proposal on the basis of its viability

or non - viability.

Credit information of the borrowing company can be obtained by the following sources:

1. Banks and Financial Institution

2. Bank References

3. Trade References

4. Credit Rating Agencies

5. Published Books: Basic information about a company may be taken from printed

sources like the Stock Exchange Year book, Corporate Path finder’s data base, etc.

6. Company Financial Reports

7. Press Reports

8. Stock Market Opinion

9. Charges Registered: Charges created on the assets of a company have to be

registered with the Registrar of Companies.

10. Personal discussion

11. Factory Visit

12. Study of Financial Statements: Financial analysis determines the significant

operating and financial characteristics of a firm from accounting data and financial

statements. Analysis can be done through:

a. Ratio Analysis

Page 25: Kriti Aggarwal

b. Trend analysis: Trend analysis can be through:

i. Intra firm comparison that is review of the trend of the ratios over the

years within the firm and

ii. Inter firm comparison.

c. Reading of notes to accounts and other information: Careful reading and

analysis of the notes on accounts, one can gauge the policies of the

management, performance of the company, and its future planning.

Information required to be submitted by the Company (Borrower) to the Bank

The company should make sure that the following information required for processing credit

requests are collected by the company for submitting it to the bank or financial institution in

order to obtain the required credit facility:

1. Basic background information on the company:

2. Required facility

3. Key industry dynamics

4. Management

5. Management information system: Details of the planning, controlling and monitoring systems which have been put in place have to given.

6. Financials

7. Details of the Security to be pledged:

8. Present banking relationship: The bank requires full details of the present credit facilities being enjoyed at the moment.

Page 26: Kriti Aggarwal

Not feasible

No Queries

Queries

Feasible

Submission of Project Report along with the Request Letter

Carrying out Due Diligence on the Client

Submission of Proposal to designated Authority (Circle office)

Re-verification and analysis of the Proposal

Submission of Proposal to designated Authority

Preparing Credit Report / Feasibility Report and Risk Rating

Determining of Interest Rate and Preparation of Proposal

Meeting with the client to clarify the queries

Vetting of Credit Risk Rating Report Approval of request made by the client like Reduction of Interest Rates etc

Sanction of Proposal on various Terms & Conditions

Acknowledgement of Sanction Terms & Condition by the client

Application to comply with Sanction T&C. Execution of Loan Documents

Disbursement of Sanctioned Amount from the branch office

CREDIT APPRAISAL PROCESS AT PNB

SME

Figure 3.4: Credit Appraisal Process

Procedures at Branch Office Procedures at Circle Office

Page 27: Kriti Aggarwal

CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT

CREDIT RISK

Definition: “Credit Risk” is the possibility of loss associated with changes in the credit quality of the borrower or counter parties. The counter parties may include an individual, small & medium enterprise, corporate, bank, financial institution, or a sovereign. In a bank’s portfolio, losses stem from outright default due to inability or unwillingness of a borrower or counter party to honour commitments in relation to lending, settlement & other financial transactions.

Framework: The overall framework of credit risk management in the bank would comprise of following building blocks:

Credit Risk Management Structure Credit Risk Policy & Strategy Processes & Systems

Formation of Credit Committee: The bank has in place “Grid/Committee” system in credit sanction process. Consequent upon implementation of 3-tier structure where Circle Office headed by AGM/ GM has been acting as a sole tier between the branch and HO, the scope of Credit Committee has been widened to cover the proposals falling under the vested loaning powers of AGMs working as Circle Heads. Accordingly, every loan proposal falling within the vested powers of Circle Head and above is discussed in a Credit Committee, which, on the merit of the case, recommends the proposal to the sanctioning authority. Such committees have been formed both at HO and Circle Office levels. The Credit Committee at HO includes CGM/GMs-Credit, CGM/GM-IRMD, GM (Treasury) and GM (Marketing). For credit proposals falling within the vested power of CGM/GM, the credit committee at CO includes AGM/Chief Manager-Credit Division, AGM/Chief Manager-Non Credit Division and AGM/Chief Manager-IRMD. The current constitution of the committee at Circle Office is as under:

One senior officer from credit department One senior officer from CRMD One independent senior officer not concerned with credit.

The members should preferably be in the rank of scale IV or above but not below the level of scale III in Circles where sufficient officers in scale IV and above are not available.

The committee deliberates upon the credit proposals including risk rating of the borrower, risk specific to the borrower, risk in the industry and suggests mitigation thereof.

Proposals emanating from LCBs and falling under HO powers shall be placed to Credit Committee at HO level. However, the proposals from LCBs falling within the vested loaning

Page 28: Kriti Aggarwal

powers of FGMs, shall be discussed in the Credit Committee of the Circle Office linked with the LCB with the condition that for such proposals the AGM of FGMO shall act as coordinator of the Committee and the Circle Head (in the absence 2nd man of the Circle Office) shall be one of the members of the Committee.

CREDIT RISK STRATEGY

Credit risk strategy is a meticulous exercise of achieving a balance between the risk to be

taken & profitability to be achieved.

The strategy has to spell out bank’s credit appetite vis-à-vis acceptable credit risk.

NEED FOR CREDIT RISK ASSESSMENT

If Terms & Conditions of Sanctions are stipulated without proper assessment of Credit Risk,

Bank might charge:

High Rate of Interest from a Good Quality Customer, which may drive them away to other

bank.

OR

Low Rate of Interest from a Poor Quality Customer, thereby not compensating for higher

losses due to higher probability of default.

CREDIT RISK RATING MODEL DEVELOPED BY PNB

Models (PNB TRAC)

S.No Credit Risk Rating Model

ApplicabilityTotal Limits Sales

1 Large Corporate Above Rs.15 Crore (OR) Above Rs.100 Crore, except Trading concerns

2 Mid Corporate Above Rs.5 Cr and upto Rs.15 Cr (OR)

Above Rs.25 Cr and upto Rs.100 Cr

All trading concerns falling in the Large Corporate category shall also be rated under this model

3 Small Loans Above Rs.50 lakh & upto Rs.5 Cr (AND)

Upto Rs.25 Cr

4 Small Loans II Above Rs.2 lakh & upto Rs.50 lakh

5 NBFC All Non Banking Financial Companies irrespective of Limit

6 New Projects Rating Above Rs.5 Cr (OR) Cost of project above

Page 29: Kriti Aggarwal

Model Rs.15 Cr.7 Entrepreneur New

Business ModelBorrower setting up new business and requiring finance above Rs.20 lakh upto Rs.5 Cr (AND)

Cost of project upto Rs.15 Cr.

However, all new trading business irrespective of limits shall be rated under this model

8 Half Yearly Review of Rating

I ) All listed companies rated on large/ mid corporate rating modelsII ) Other borrowal accounts rated on large/ mid corporate rating models availing limits (FB+NFB) above Rs.50 Cr from the bank

9 Facility Rating Framework

Assigning rating to facility sanctioned to the borrower based on default rating and securities available

10 Credit Risk Rating models for Banks/FI

All Banks & Financial Institutions

11 NPA Model For marking NPA accounts in on-line PNB Trac Credit Risk Rating System

12 Future Lease Rental Model

Advances to property owners against future lease rentals

Table 3.1: Credit Risk Rating Models

AREAS FOR EVALUATION

All the models have four areas of evaluation – Financials, Business & Industry, Management

& Conduct of Account.

The weightage under various risk areas vary from model to model as under:

Models Financials Business &

Industry

Management Conduct of A/c

Large 40% 25% 25% 10%

Medium 40% 25% 20% 15%

Small 40% 20% 20% 20%

Small – II 36% 16% 28% 20%

New – upto

Implementaion

25% 30% 45% NA

New- after 30% 25% 30% 15%

Page 30: Kriti Aggarwal

implementation

ENBM 25% 35% 40% NA

Table 3.2: Weightage under various Risk Areas

For any new project, fresh proposal less weightage is given to financials and more to

management as there is less chance of any reliable past financials.

FINAL RATING SCORE, CATEGORY & RISK INDICATORS

The credit risk rating has been divided into 7 categories (from PNB ‘AAA’ to PNB ‘D’)

according to the total final score (%) obtained by the borrower as shown under:

Score Obtained Category Risk Indicator

Above 80.00 PNB- AAA Minimum Risk

Above 77.50 upto 80.00 PNB- AA+ Marginal risk

Above 72.50 upto 77.50 PNB-AA

Above 70.00 upto 72.50 PNB-AA-

Above 67.50 upto 70.00 PNB- A+ Modest risk

Above 62.50 upto 67.50 PNB- A

Above 60.00 upto 62.50 PNB – A-

Above 57.50 upto 60.00 PNB- BB+ Average risk

Above 52.50 upto 57.50 PNB- BB

Above 50.00 upto 52.50 PNB- BB-

Above 47.50 upto 50.00 PNB- B+ Marginally acceptable risk

Above 42.50 upto 47.50 PNB- B

Above 40.00 upto 42.50 PNB- B-

Above 30.00 upto 40.00 PNB – C High risk

Page 31: Kriti Aggarwal

30.00 and below PNB – D Caution

Table 3.3: Rating Score, Category & Risk Indicators

DECISION ON RISK ACCEPTANCE LEVELS

Linking loaning powers with Risk Rating: The Bank has in place a multi-tier credit approving system. In order to enable the field functionaries for taking expeditious decisions and also to attract quality accounts, higher loaning powers have been vested with the sanctioning officials in the rank of CMs/AGMs/DGMs/Circle Heads/GMs (HO) in case of borrowers with credit risk rating of ‘A’ & above. In case of ‘AAA’ & ‘AA’ rated borrowers, 125% and in case of ‘A’ rated borrowers, 110% of their normal loaning powers shall be exercised.

No fresh exposure should be taken up to field level for borrowers under unfavourable industries irrespective of their credit risk rating. Only ad hoc/additional/ enhancement facilities may be considered at the field level for borrowers under unfavourable industries. However, GM (HO/Field) & above may consider fresh proposals under unfavourable industries within their vested loaning powers.

In case of exporter borrowers, officials up to AGM level shall exercise powers upto 125% of aggregate commitment per borrower provided that additional 25% powers are utilized only for export limits.

All officials can exercise their normal ad hoc powers over and above the increased powers vested in them. However, Circle Heads/DGMs/GMs while exercising powers of 125% in case of ‘AA’ & ‘AAA’ rated borrowers have to ensure that the total commitment does not exceed the aggregate powers vested with the next higher authority.

To regulate Bank’s exposure in case of low rated accounts and industries, the following restrictions imposed for exercising of loaning powers shall continue to be followed:

CRR For other than unfavourable industries

*For unfavourable industries

‘B’ Enhancement/ additional/ ad hoc exposure, officials at all levels can exercise their normal loaning powers.For fresh exposure, officials other than CMD/ED/GM (HO/Field) shall exercise 75% of vested loaning powers except in case of ‘B-‘and ‘B’ rated borrowers where officials up to the level of Circle

Enhancement/additional/ad hoc exposure, cases shall be sanctioned by the next higher authority not below the level of Circle HeadsNo fresh exposure should be taken up to the level of Circle Heads. However, CMD/ED/GM (HO/Field) shall exercise their normal loaning powers for

Page 32: Kriti Aggarwal

Heads shall not exercise loaning powers for taking fresh exposure. However, CMD/ED/GM (HO/Field) shall exercise their normal loaning powers for considering enhancement/additional/ad hoc/fresh exposure.

considering enhancement/additional/ad hoc/ fresh exposure.

‘C’ & ‘D’

No fresh exposure is to be taken in ‘C’ & ‘D’ rated accounts. However, MC is empowered to consider fresh exposure in case of ‘C’ & ‘D’ rated borrowers. Renewals shall be considered by competent authority if exit is not feasible. Ad hoc/additional/enhancement facility is to be sanctioned by the next higher authority not below the level of Circle Heads. However, ED/CMD shall exercise their normal loaning powers for considering enhancement/additional/ad hoc exposures.

*A list of industry rating including the unfavourable industries have been advised vide L&A Circular No. 06 dated 14.01.2011. In case industry is upgraded, the restriction shall be removed automatically.

Table 3.4: Restrictions on Loaning Powers

SME

The Indian micro- and small-enterprises (MSEs) sector plays a pivotal role in the country's

industrial economy. These are companies whose personnel numbers fall below certain limits.

Page 33: Kriti Aggarwal

In most economies, smaller enterprises outnumber large companies by a wide margin. SMEs

are said to be responsible for driving innovation and competition in many economic sectors.

It is a part of Government drive to encourage small manufacturers to enjoy credit facility

from banks at concessional rates. It is estimated that in value, the sector accounts for about 39

percent of manufacturing output and about 33 percent of total exports. In recent years, the

MSE sector has consistently registered a higher growth rate than the overall industrial sector.

The major advantage of the MSE sector is its employment potential at a low capital cost.

Classification of Enterprises

Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Development Act 2006Classification Manufacturing Services

Micro Enterprise 25 lakh 10lakhSmall Enterprise >25 to =< 5 Cr >10 to =< 2 CrMedium Enterprise >5 Cr to =< 10 Cr >2 Cr to =< 5 CrManufacturing :- Maximum investment in Plant & Machinery for manufacturing or production of goods is pertaining to industryServices: - Maximum investment in equipments, for enterprise engaged in providing or rendering of services.

Table 3.5: Classification of Enterprises

List of activities covered under SME

Background: RBI based on the recommendations of Prime Minister’s High Level Task Force recommendations, has inter alia advised banks that the share of advances to Micro Enterprises out of total advances to Micro & Small Enterprises (MSEs) should reach a level of 60% by 31st March 2013 in stages i.e. 50% by 31st March 2011, 55% by 31st March 2012 and 60% by 31st March 2013. It is, therefore, necessary to step up and give focus for the attention for lending to micro enterprises.

CGTMSE Coverage: All collateral free advances to MSEs (except trading and educational institutions) up to Rs 100 lakh are eligible for coverage under Credit Guarantee Trust for Micro & Small Enterprises (CGTSMSE). Further, even if the total advances to MSE are more than 100 lakh, credit guarantee cover up to Rs 100 lakh is available, provided the same is collateral free/ without third party guarantee.

Illustrative list for lending to Micro Enterprises in Service/Manufacturing Sectors (Common to all places):

i. Consultancy Services including Management Services

Page 34: Kriti Aggarwal

ii. Renting of Agriculture Machinery (Harvesting)iii. Composite Broker Services in Risk and Insurance Managementiv. Third Party Administration (TPA) Services for Medical Insurance Claims of Policy

Holdersv. Seed grading Services

vi. Training-cum-Incubator Centresvii. Educational Institutions

viii. Training Institutesix. Retail Tradex. Practice of Law, i.e. legal services

xi. Trading in medical instruments (brand new)xii. Advertising Agency

xiii. Advances to Transport Sectorxiv. Courier Servicesxv. Catering

xvi. Industrial Photographyxvii. Oil mills

xviii. Leather itemsxix. Food Processingxx. Papad and Mangori Making

xxi. Confectionary and bakeryxxii. Handmade Papers

xxiii. Ice Candyxxiv. Handicraftsxxv. Kacha Brick manufacturers

xxvi. Jiggery Makingxxvii. Beauty Parlours and Creches

xxviii. Mini rice millsxxix. Sauce/Picklexxx. Steel Furniture

xxxi. Woodcraftxxxii. Weight Bridge

xxxiii. Auto Repair and service centrexxxiv. Desk top Publishingxxxv. Xeroxing

xxxvi. Gems and jewellery designingxxxvii. Nursing Homes/clinics

xxxviii. ISD/STD Boothsxxxix. X-ray Clinic

xl. Laundry and Dry Cleaningxli. Tailoring , boutiques

xlii. Washing powder and Soapsxliii. Ropeways in hilly areasxliv. Industrial R&D labs

Page 35: Kriti Aggarwal

xlv. Event Managementxlvi. Readymade Garments

xlvii. Aluminum/Steel utensilsxlviii. Typing Centres

xlix. Teleprinters/Fax services

Credit Exposure Ceiling

Exposure: Exposure shall include credit exposure (funded and non-funded credit limits) and investment exposure (including underwriting and similar commitments) as well as certain types of investments in companies. The sanctioned limit or outstanding, whichever is higher, shall be reckoned for arriving at exposure limit. Further, non-fund based exposure should also be reckoned at 100 percent of the limits or outstandings, whichever are higher. In case of fully drawn term loans, where there is no scope for redrawal of any portion of the sanctioned limits, the outstanding shall be reckoned as exposure. However, in case of other term loans, the exposure shall be computed as usual i.e. “sanctioned limits or outstandings, whichever are higher”.

Prudential Exposure Limit for Single/Group Borrowers: As per RBI Guidelines Credit exposure ceiling shall be as under: (Rs. In crore)

S.No Category of borrower Prescribed RBI ceiling%age of capital fund @ Amount for 2011-2012

1. Single 15 4633.152. Single (with additional 5% in

infrastructure project)20 6177.53

3. Group 40 12355.074. Group (with additional 10% in

infrastructure project)50 15443.84

@Capital Fund as at 31.03.2011---Rs.30887.68 crore

Table 3.6: Credit Exposure Ceiling

FINANCIAL RATIOS

While analyzing the financial aspects of project, it would be advisable to analyze the

important financial ratios over a period of time as it may tell us a lot about a unit’s liquidity

Page 36: Kriti Aggarwal

position, managements’ stake in the business, capacity to service the debts etc. The financial

ratios which are considered important are discussed as under:

Ratio Formula Remarks

1Debt-Equity Ratio

Debt (Term Liabilities)

Equity

(Where, Equity = Share capital, free reserves, premium on shares, , etc. after adjusting loss balance)

It indicates what proportion of equity and debt the company is using to finance its assets. Compares assets provided by creditors to assets provided by shareholders. There cannot be a rigid rule to satisfactory debt- equity, lower the ratio higher is the degree of protection enjoyed by the creditors. These days the debt equity ratio of 2:1 is considered reasonable. It, however, is higher i.e. 1.5:1 in respect of capital intensive projects. But it is always desirable that owners have a substantial stake in the project. Other features like quality of management should be kept in view while agreeing to a less favorable ratio. In financing highly capital intensive projects like infrastructure, cement, etc. the ratio could be considered at a higher level.

2

Debt-Service Coverage Ratio

Debt + Depreciation + Net Profit (After Taxes) + Annual interest on long term debt

Annual interest on long term debt + Repayment of debt

DSCR is the ratio of cash available for debt servicing to interest, principal and lease payments. It is a popular benchmark used in the measurement of an entity’s (person or corporation) ability to produce enough cash to cover its debt (including lease) payments. The higher this ratio is, the easier it is to obtain a loan. This ratio of 1.5 to 2 is considered reasonable. A very high ratio may indicate the need for lower moratorium period/repayment of loan in a shorter schedule. This ratio provides a measure of the ability of an enterprise to service its debts i.e. `interest’ and `principal repayment’ besides indicating the margin of safety. The ratio may vary from industry to industry but has to be viewed with circumspection when it is less than 1.5.

Page 37: Kriti Aggarwal

3TOL / TNW Ratio

Tangible Net Worth (Paid up Capital + Reserves and Surplus - Intangible Assets)

Total outside Liabilities

Tangible Net Worth

This ratio gives a view of borrower’s capital structure. If the ratio shows a decreasing trend, it indicates that the borrower is relying more on his own funds and less on outside funds and vice versa

4

Current Ratio

Current Assets

Current Liabilities

The current ratio is a financial ratio that measures whether or not a firm has enough resources to pay its debts over the next 12 months. It compares a firm’s current assets to its current liabilities. Higher the ratio greater the short term liquidity. This ratio is indicative of short term financial position of a business enterprise. It provides margin as well as it is measure of the business enterprise to pay-off the current liabilities as they mature and its capacity to withstand sudden reverses by the strength of its liquid position. Ratio analysis gives indications; to be made with reference to overall tendencies and parameters in relation to the project.

Table 3.7: Ratios & their Significance

Page 38: Kriti Aggarwal

ASSESSMENT OF WORKING CAPITALMethods:

I. Turnover Method: Turnover method also known as the simplified turnover method

is based on the recommendations given by Nayak Committee. Under this method, the

working capital requirement is 25% of average projected turnover, out of which the

party has to contribute 5% of average projected turnover as margin and remaining

20% will be financed by bank. The minimum margin of 5% shall be by way of

promoter’s contribution towards margin money. However, if the available NWC in

the system exceeds stipulated 5% minimum margin, the same shall be reckoned for

assessing the extent of bank finance and limits will be determined accordingly. This

method is used for financing of loan within the limit of 2 crore for trading and service

concerns or others and 5 crore for a manufacturing concern.

II. Maximum Permissible Bank Finance Method: This method is based on the

recommendations given by Tondon committee. As per the recommendations of

Tandon Committee, the corporate should be discouraged from accumulating too much

of stocks of current assets and should move towards very lean inventories and

receivable levels. The committee even suggested the maximum levels of Raw

Material, Stock-in-process and Finished Goods which a corporate operating in an

industry should be allowed to accumulate. These levels were termed as inventory and

receivable norms. Depending on the size of credit required, the funding of these

current assets (working capital needs) of the corporate could be met by one of the

following methods:

First method of lending: Banks can work out the working capital gap, i.e. total current assets less current liabilities other than bank borrowings (called Maximum Permissible Bank Finance or MPBF) and finance a maximum of 75 per cent of the gap; the balance to come out of long-term funds, i.e., owned funds and term borrowings. This approach was considered suitable only for very small borrowers i.e. where the requirements of credit were less than Rs.10 lacs

Second Method of Lending: Under this method, it was thought that the borrower should provide for a minimum of 25% of total current assets out of long-term funds i.e., owned funds plus term borrowings. A certain level of credit for purchases and other current liabilities will be available to fund the buildup of current assets and the bank will provide the balance (MPBF). Consequently, total current liabilities inclusive of bank borrowings could

Page 39: Kriti Aggarwal

not exceed 75% of current assets. RBI stipulated that the working capital needs of all borrowers enjoying fund based credit facilities of more than Rs. 10 lacs should be appraised (calculated) under this method.

Third Method of Lending: Under this method, the borrower's contribution from long term funds will be to the extent of the entire CORE CURRENT ASSETS, which has been defined by the Study Group as representing the absolute minimum level of raw materials, process stock, finished goods and stores which are in the pipeline to ensure continuity of production and a minimum of 25% of the balance current assets should be financed out of the long term funds plus term borrowings.(This method was not accepted for implementation and hence is of only academic interest).

Under MBPF method for assessment of borrowers working capital needs, the

projections submitted by borrowers are relevant.

The first step in assessing the quantum of WC finance is to find out whether the

projections given by the borrower are reasonable.

Once the borrower’s overall projections for the following year have been accepted

then the actual requirement of the WC and bank finance can be worked out as:

The actual requirement of WC can be arrived on the basis of position of

current assets and other current liabilities

The bank is to partly meet to difference between current assets and other

current liabilities

If the available NWC is more than the minimum stipulated WC under the

second method of lending, the available NWC is to be taken into account for

arriving at the permissible level of bank finance i.e. permissible bank finance

will be reduced accordingly.

III. Cash Budget System: In case of tea, sugar, film industries and service sector

requirement of finance may be at the peak during certain months while the same

proceeds may be realized throughout the year to repay the outstanding in the account.

Therefore, credit limits are fixed on the basis of projected monthly cash budgets to be

received before beginning of the season.

Page 40: Kriti Aggarwal

PRE SANCTION APPRAISAL

When a credit proposal is presented to a branch by a prospective borrower for sanction by an appropriate authority, the appropriate authority may either sanction or reject the proposal. The decision to sanction or reject the proposal has to be based on a careful analysis of various facts and data presented by the borrower concerning him and the proposal. Such an objective and in-depth study of the information and data should convince the sanctioning authority that the money lent to the borrower for the desired purpose will be safe and it will be repaid with interest over the desired period ,if the assumptions and terms and conditions on which it is sanctioned, are fulfilled. Such an in-depth study is called the pre-sanction credit appraisal. It provides the sanctioning authority with the reasons and justifications for either sanctioning or rejecting a credit proposal. It, thus, helps in the decision making process of the sanctioning authority.

The entire gamut of credit appraisal can be segregated into 7 sections is under:

a. Borrower Appraisal.

b. Technical Appraisal.

c. Management Appraisal.

d. Financial Appraisal.

e. Economic Appraisal.

f. Market Appraisal.

g. Environmental Appraisal.

1. BORROWER APPRAISAL / KNOW YOUR CUSTOMER (KYC) NORMS:

The borrower is appraised on the following parameters also known as the 3

‘C’s of the borrower i.e. character, capacity and capital.

(1) Character:

Character is the greatest and the most important asset, which any individual can have. Even if

a borrower has the capacity and capital to repay a loan, it is the character of the borrower

which indicates his intention to repay. If the character or integrity of a borrower is known to

be questionable, every banker would avoid him even if backed by sufficient collaterals.

(2) Capacity:

It deals with the ability of the borrower to manage an enterprise or venture successfully with

the resources available to him. His educational, technical and professional qualifications, his

antecedents, present activity, experience in the line of business, experiences of the family,

Page 41: Kriti Aggarwal

special skill or knowledge possessed by him, his past record etc. would give a hindsight into

his capacity to manage the show successfully and repay the loan.

(3) Capital:

It is his ability to meet the loss, if any, sustained in the business or venture from his own

investment or capital without shifting it to his creditor or banker. Unless a borrower has some

Stake in the business, he may not take much interest in its success.

Key Elements of the KYC Policy:

a.) Customer Acceptance Policy

b.) Customer Identification Procedures

c.) Monitoring of Transactions

d.) Risk Management

2. TECHNICAL APPRAISAL:

The technical appraisal of a credit proposal involves a detailed study of the following aspects:

1) Availability of basic infrastructure.

2) Licensing/registration requirements.

3) Selection of technology.

4) Availability of suitable technical process, raw material skilled labor etc.

3. MANAGEMENT APPRAISAL:

In case of projects, units or enterprises run by individuals as sole proprietors or partnership

firms, it is usually one or two persons who manage the entire project, unit or the enterprise

whether it be of manufacturing or trading.

However, in case of corporate borrowers and also in case of large borrowal accounts, it is

usually a set of professionals who manage the entity each specialized in a specific area of

management i.e. production, finance, marketing, personnel etc. Unless there is a complete

integration of all these functions within an organization, it cannot function effectively.

4. FINANCIAL APPRAISAL:

The term financial appraisal refers to the study of the following aspects of the project/unit:

i. Determination of the cost of the project.

ii. Assessment of the source of funds/means of financing the project

iii. Profitability estimates.

iv. Break even analysis.

Page 42: Kriti Aggarwal

v. Cash flow projections.

vi. Projected balance-sheet.

5. ECONOMIC APPRAISAL:

The performance of a project is influenced by a variety of other economic, social and cultural

factors. Even if a project is technically feasible and financially viable, it may not satisfy the

economic needs viz. employment potential, development of industrially backward areas,

environmental pollution etc. Further as capital is a scarce resource, it is necessary that it must

be allocated in such a way that it yields best possible return to the society in general and the

investor in particular. As such a detailed appraisal of the project in terms of the return it

generates to the investor and the lending institutions is necessary before a decision is taken to

commit resources. One of the most important methods of appraising this is the computation

of the Internal Rate of Return of the project.

Internal Rate of Return (IRR):

IRR is defined as the discount rate at which the present values of all investments made in a

project are equal to the present value of all future returns from the project over the assumed

life period of the project.

Sensitivity Analysis:

The actual results differ from the projected results. If the actual results are plus/ minus 10%

of projections, it can be considered that the projections have been made very well. Debt-

Service coverage ratio, break-even point and many other ratios have to be calculated on the

basis of these financial projections. If the financial projections go wrong and the expected

cash accruals are not available with the unit, the repayment of term loan will face difficulties.

The appraising officers should ascertain the most sensitive areas of the project. If the working

results of the project are highly sensitive to a particular variable, sufficient study should be

done to find out the probability of change in that variable and its impact on the viability of the

project.

6. MARKET APPRAISAL:

While appraising a proposal it is not only necessary to find out whether it is technically

feasible and financially viable, but also important to ascertain the marketability of the product

manufactured/sold. If goods produced cannot be sold there would be no point in producing

Page 43: Kriti Aggarwal

them. Hence the marketability or salability of goods is of great importance. Existence of a

market for the product provides the rationale for its production. If the product sought to be

manufactured is the only one of its kind for which there are no substitutes, the marketing of

the same may not be a problem excepting when it can be freely imported and that too at a

lesser cost. However, if there are many competitors, the entrepreneur may find the going

tough. However a combination of the factors like man behind the show, the quality of the

product and the strategy for its sale will result in its successful marketing.

In order to ensure that a project is viable, its viability should be appraised/gauged/examined

from different aspects which are:

TECHNICAL

APPRAISAL

FINANCIAL

APPRAISAL

MANAGERIAL

APPRAISAL

1) Manufacturing

Process

2) Technical

arrangements

3) Size of the plant

4) Product mix

5) Selection of plant &

machinery

6) Plant layout

7) Location of the

project

1) Capital cost of

the project

2) Sources of

finance

3) Financial

projections

4) Ratio analysis

5) Breakeven point

6) Discounted cash

flow techniques

1) Qualities of

an entrepreneur

2) Various forms

of organizations

3) Organizational

setup

4) Management

problems

Page 44: Kriti Aggarwal

POST SANCTION AND FOLLOW UP OF LOANS

Supervision and Follow-up of bank credit has assumed considerable significance particularly

after introduction of new norms of assets classification, provisioning and derecognition of

interest income on NPAs, affecting profitability. System of supervision and follow up can be

defined as the systematic evaluation of the performance of a borrowal account to ensure that

it operates at viable level and, if problems arise, to suggest practical solutions. It helps in

keeping a watch on the conduct and operational/financial performance of the borrowal

accounts. Further, it also helps in detecting signals/symptoms of sickness and deteriorations,

if any, taking place in the conduct of the account for initiating timely corrective actions to

check slippage of accounts to NPA category.

The goals and objectives of monitoring may be classified into fundamental and

supplementary goals. Fundamental goals help a bank to ensure safety of funds lent to an

enterprise while, supplementary goals are directed towards keeping abreast of problems

arising out of changes in both the internal and the external environment for initiating timely

corrective actions. Some of the important goals of monitoring are listed as under:

i. To keep a watch on the project during implementation stage so that there are no time

& cost overruns.

ii. To ensure that the funds released are utilized for the purpose for which these have

been provided and there is no diversion of such funds.

iii. To evaluate operational and financial results, such as production, sales, profit/loss,

flow of funds, etc. and comparing these with the projections/estimates given by the

borrower at the time of sanction of credit facilities.

iv. To ensure that the terms and conditions as stipulated in the sanction have been

complied with.

v. To monitor operations in the account particularly cash credit facilities which indicate

health of the account.

vi. To obtain market report on the borrower, to gather information like

reputation/financial standing etc.

Page 45: Kriti Aggarwal

vii. To detect signals and symptoms of sickness or deterioration taking place in

conduct/performance of the account.

viii. To ensure that the unit's management and organizational set-up is effective.

ix. To keep a check on aspects like accumulation of statutory liabilities, creditors,

debtors, raw-material, stocks-in-process, finished goods, etc.

x. To ensure charging of applicable rate of interest/penal interest/ commitment charges

as per bank's guidelines.

System of supervision & monitoring of credit as laid down by the Bank needs to be

meticulously followed by the branches/controlling offices which, inter alia, covers the

following:

i. Conveying the sanction

ii. Maintenance of Loan Document File

iii. Quarterly Review Sheet

iv. Preventive Monitoring System

v. Quarterly Monitoring System

vi. Inspection and Physical Verification of stocks – Stock Audit

vii. Inspection and physical Verification of Securities

Page 46: Kriti Aggarwal

CASE ANALYSIS

During my training at PNB, I assessed the proposal of Disha Engineering Ltd. The Company is a small scale unit incorporated under the Companies Act. The company is engaged in the manufacturing of various components and assemblies and sub-assemblies such as (a) Forging based (b) Steel components and (c) Sheet Metal Components used in Automobile and Tractor industry.

The company proposed for renewal of loan, which includes:

1. Fund based- Existing Limit of 600 lakhs which is proposed to be enhanced to 1000 lakhs.

2. Non Fund Based- Existing Limit of 100 lakhs to be enhanced to 400 lakhs for ILG/ILC

3. Term Loan- Fresh Term loan of 250 lakhs, in addition to Existing Loan of 222 lakhs

The following is enclosed proposal of Disha Engineering:

Page 47: Kriti Aggarwal

ACTIVITY SHEET

ABC Bank

CO- South Delhi

Ref- COSD/CRNKK Dated 28.01.2012 Circle Head- (South Delhi)

The proposal falls under the powers of CH on account of total exposure is 1872 Lacs

Name of the Borrower and BO & Controlling Office – : M/s.Disha Engineering Co. Pvt.Ltd.: BO Old FARIDABAD : Circle Office : South Delhi

AGM (B) has recommended for enhancement of FB, NFB Fund based & Fresh T/L limits along with approval of other issues detailed below in favour of the captioned party. (Branch proposal placed below forms part of this proposal).

GIST OF THE PROPOSAL –

A. Renewal of  Working Capital Limits In Lacs

Existing Limits

Proposed Enhancement

Remarks

FB – CC-H & BD 600 1000 Book Debts not to exceed 50%

Non fund Based

ILC/ILG 100 400

TL existing 222 222

Fresh T/L 250

TOTAL COMMITMENT

922 1872

B- Other Issues –

Concession of 0..50 % on applicable rates in ROI on account of CRISIL rating SE-1A

50% Concession in Processing fee 0.25% Concession in Upfront fee

Page 48: Kriti Aggarwal

Loan Policy The proposal exposure is within prudential norms and conforms to the loan policy of banks.

Audit Observations

Particulars Remarks/Observations/Steps taken

a) Annual inspection IR 30.06.2011 Since Closed

b) Stock audit NO serious Observation

c) RBI AUDIT No Observation in this account

Industry Rating as per RMD

As per L&A circular no. 06.2012 dated 12.01.2012 IS neutral – Auto Ancillaries and components

Whether Agriculture/Retail/ SME/Others (Please specify)

SME- Manufacturing of Components and Assemblies for Auto and Tractor Parts

Asset Classification as on  and last PMS score

Standard- PMS- 1

Consortium / Multiple Banking

Presently Sole Banking

Credit risk rating Rating ABS Score%

Model Indicating

Current CO-

BB+

31.03.11

59.01% Large Corporate

Average Risk

Key areas of Risks /Mitigation Factors-- As per ABS 31.03.2011

Risks Mitigation /Observations reply of the branch

TOL /TNW on higher side 3.90

TOL / TNW estimated to improve to 2.06 during the current year on account of further introduction of capital and long terms funds.

Current raio is 1.07 which is lower than bench mark

As per Provisional BS of 30.09.2011, current ratio improved to 1.10. However, company will introduce sufficient capital

Page 49: Kriti Aggarwal

and long terms funds to bring the ratio to 1.33 by 31.03.2012.

Company has not achieved PBT targets for 2010- 11

Mainly due to job work done from outside which is a costly affair. Now company has reduced its dependency on job work from outside to save cost.

Credit rating by external Agencies – By CRISIL is SE1 A as per rating done on 03.11.11 which reflects highest performance capabilities and high financial capabilities

Brief history – The Company is a small scale unit incorporated under the Companies Act vides Registration No. 55-21578 dated 26-07-1985. However the unit was originally established in the year 1982 as a partnership firm in the name and style of M. S. Engineering Co. and later converted into a private limited company in its present name in 1985. Initially the company was promoted and managed by Mr. Sanjeev Arora and Mrs. Seema Nayak .Later, Mrs. Seema Nayak retired in the year 2001 and presently the company is wholly owned and managed by Arora family.

The company is engaged in the manufacturing of various components and assemblies and sub-assemblies such as (a) Forging based (b) Steel components and (c) Sheet Metal Components used in Automobile and Tractor industry.

Company has its manufacturing units located at Faridabad, Haryana and Rudrapur, Uttarakhand equipped with latest plant and machinery. The company has grown substantially and consistently since inception. The company is a registered vendor of M/s Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. and Maruti Udyog Ltd. (through Ancillaries). About 60% of company’s production is consumed by M&M Limited. Company is also making headway into components manufacturing for Maruti Udyog Ltd. and about 25% of the total production facilities are reportedly earmarked for MUL. Company has also developed and is manufacturing components for various other automobile manufactures either directly or through their registered vendors.

Page 50: Kriti Aggarwal

FINANCIALS of Disha Engg .

31.03.09

31.03.10

31.03.11

31.03.12

31.03.13

AUDITED

AUDITED

AUDITED ESTI. PROJ.

I Gross Sales 3110.15 3430.26 5259.367000.0

08050.0

0

II *Domestic 3110.15 3430.26 5259.367000.0

08050.0

0

III *Exports 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

IV % Growth#VALUE

! 10.29 53.32 33.10 15.00

VOther Income (Non Operational) 1.25 10.47 9.45 0.00 0.00

VI Operating Profit 56.40 116.74 202.68 361.64 420.94

VII Profit Before Tax. 56.40 116.74 202.68 361.64 420.94

VIII Profit After Tax 49.80 98.70 161.32 291.83 309.51

IX Cash Profit 115.24 174.00 260.45 396.96 425.25

X Paid Up Capital 165.00 255.50 255.50 397.00 397.00

XI

Reserves & Surpluses Excluding Revaluation Reserves

228.63 227.27 392.16 729.001008.7

3

Page 51: Kriti Aggarwal

XII Misc. Exp. Not W/off 0.51 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00

XIII Accumulated Losses 0 0 0 0 0

XIVDeferred Tax Liabilities/ Assets 32.76 48.58 45.01 0.00 0.00

XV Tangible Net worth 341.63 531.18 692.671106.0

01405.7

3

Investments in allied concerns and amount of cross holding 0 0 0 0 0

Net Owned funds 341.63 531.18 692.671106.0

01405.7

3

XVI Unsecured Loans 115.02 115.02 115.02 115.02 115.02

XVII Total Borrowings 1548.16 1757.97 2739.712221.5

22379.9

8

XVIII Secured 604.55 626.06 964.391433.6

11420.6

6

XIX Unsecured 943.61 1131.91 1775.32 787.91 959.32

XX Investments 8.00 1.75 26.88 0.00 0.00

XXI Total Assets 1890.30 2289.32 3432.383327.2

43758.8

1

XXII Out of which net fixed assets 696.60 754.02 891.111096.4

41150.4

3

XXIII Net Working Capital 54.48 104.33 177.15 469.75 682.54

XXIV Current Ratio 1.03 1.07 1.08 1.25 1.33

XXV Debt Equity Ratio 1.20 0.62 0.54 0.40 0.31

Page 52: Kriti Aggarwal

XXVI Operating profit/Sales(%age) 1.81 3.40 3.67 5.46 5.24

XXVII TOL/TNW 4.61 3.31 3.90 2.06 1.76

XXVIII Long Term sources 751.06 857.31 1068.25

1566.19

1832.97

XXIX Long Term Uses 696.60 754.02 891.11 717.68 884.91

XXX Surplus/ Deficit 54.46 103.29 177.14 848.51 948.06

XXXI Short Term Sources 1168.84 1432.00 2322.761877.6

42043.6

1

XXXII Short Term Uses 1223.32 1535.11 2499.902726.1

52991.6

7

XXXIII Surplus/ Deficit 54.48 103.11 177.14 848.51 948.06

Depreciation 65.44 75.30 99.13 105.13 116.01

KEY FINANCIALS

Period ended

Cumulative position as on 30.09.11

Accepted for the current year

%age achievement upto latest quarter/HY/Q3

Remarks

30.09.2011 3399 7000 48.55%  The projected sales seems to be achievable. 

Page 53: Kriti Aggarwal

BRIEF DISCUSSION on Financial Indicators:

1. Paid up capital/TNW

The Authorized and Paid–up Capital of the company is Rs. 2.70 crores and Rs.2.55 crores

respectively. TNW has improved from Rs. 3.42 Crores as at 31.3.2009 to Rs. 5.31 Crores as

at 31.03.2010 to Rs.6.93 crores as on 31.03.11 due to plough back of profits. The Co.

proposes to raise its Authorised Capital to Rs.4.00 crores and accordingly the paid up capital

is proposed to be raised to Rs.3.97 crores as on 31.03.12.

Reconciliation of TNW

(Rs. in Crore)

TNW as on close of FY ended 31.3.2010 5.31

Add: Retained profit for the year 1.61

TNW as on close of FY ended 31.3.2011 6.92

2. Sales

The Co. has achieved Gross sales of Rs.52.59 crores as on 31.03.11 (Audited) against projected sales of Rs.46 crores thus the company has not only achieved but also has surpassed the budget by 14.32%. The Co. has achieved growth of 53.32% as on 31.03.11 over 31.03.10.The sales were Rs.34.30 crores during 31.03.2010 and Rs 31.10 Crores during the year ended 31.03.2009. The company has achieved sales of Rs.33.99 crores up to 30.09.11 and the projected sales of Rs.70.00 crores during 2011-12, which seems to be achievable in view of past trend of growth and addition of new customers to company’s clientele besides increase in demand from existing customers.

The major contributor of the sales is Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M) which comprises about 60% of total sales. The same is expected to continue as the company has running orders and

Page 54: Kriti Aggarwal

scheduled supply schedules from M&M till the close of the current financial year. The Rudrapur Factory of the company which is mostly catering to this demand, especially for M&M’s Rajkot Factory, has already achieved a sale of Rs. 8 crores in the first half of the FY 2012 and considering the orders in hand and available supply schedule, the company targets to achieve a sale of Rs. 20.00 crores from this unit itself.

3. Other income

Company has not projected any other income, though in the past it has earned some interest and other misc income such as write-offs etc, which is not significant as compared to overall level of operations of the company.

4. Profitability

The Operating Profit is Rs.116.74 lacs as on 31.03.10 which has increased to Rs.202.68 lacs

as on 31.03.11 i.e. operating profit to sales is 3.40% as on 31.03.10 which has improved to

3.67% as on 31.03.11. The projected Operating Profit will be Rs.363.90 lacs and Rs.418.39

lacs as on 31.03.12 and 31.03.13 i.e. 5.20% and 5.20% respectively, the reason for increase

will be the job-work that was previously outsourced will be done in-house, economies of

scale, fixed overheads will not change with the increase in sales and saving of cost of funds

due to low level of credit period allowed by suppliers of raw material because higher credit

period entail higher cost.

The net profit (after tax) of the company is reported at Rs.161.32 lacs as on 31.03.11 against

Rs.98.70 lacs during the previous financial year 2010 and Rs. 49.80 lacs earned for FY 2009.

The net profit margin is 3.07% as on 31.03.11 which has improved from 2.88% as on

31.03.10. Operating profit to sales has also improved from 1.81% as on 31.03.09 to 3.40% as

on 31.03.10 to 3.67% as on 31.03.11, mainly on account of control of manufacturing and

administrative overheads as a percentage of sales.

Profit Before Depreciation, Interest and Taxes to Sales is 9.25% as on 31.03.10 which has

marginally declined to 9.17% as on 31.03.11 but the same is expected to improve to 9.74% as

on 31.03.12 and 10.06% as on 31.03.13 due to control over expenditure and better utilization

of installed capacity.

5. Investments

The company has not made any investments in associate concern.

6. TOL/TNW

Page 55: Kriti Aggarwal

The gearing ratio increased to 3.90 times as at 31.3.2011 as compared to 3.31 times as at 31.3.2010 mainly on account of enhancement in working capital limits during last financial year. The TOL/TNW ratio is estimated to improve to 2.06 times during the current year and further to 1.76 times as at 31.03.13, on account of introduction of fresh Share Capital, enhanced retained profit and repayment of existing loans.

7. Current ratio/NWC

The Net working capital of the company has increased from Rs.1.03 crores as at 31.03.2010

to Rs. 1.77 crores as at 31.03.2011 resulting in a marginal improvement in current ratio of the

company from 1.07:1 to 1.08:1. The Current Ratio and NWC remain major shortcoming in

the financial performance of the company with major reason of poor liquidity being

deployment of short term funds (advance from customers and sundry creditors) to long term

uses (additions in fixed assets). The borrower has also informed that the investments in fixed

assets are necessary to augment the production facility to execute the orders in hand as any

order of a new product type/ mix from clients requires certain customization in the existing

plant and new tools and dies for such product. The position of Block of assets also shows that

the same has increased from Rs.995.81 lacs as on 31.03.09 to Rs.1128.02 lacs as on 31.03.10

to Rs.1338.77 lacs as on 31.03.11 to Rs.1501.70 lacs as on 30.09.11.

8. Debt Equity Ratio

The debt equity ratio of the company is 0.54:1 as at 31.03.2011, which is within permissible limit of 2:1.

Page 56: Kriti Aggarwal

SECURITY

Primary--- For working capital limits: Hypothecation of stocks of RM, consumables, WIP, FG, bills, book debts and other current assets present & future, except only those bills which are discounted by Kotak Mahindra Bank under an arrangement with Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.

For Term Loan: Hyp of machinery, Tools & Dies already purchased and proposed to be purchased out of term loan and own funds.

Collateral (Information in respect of mortgage of IP to be given only in the following format:

i) Hypothecation/ Mortgage of Block Assets Immovable Properties

(Rs. In Crore)

Security Description

Ownership Value Basis for valuation

Date Whether existing/ fresh

Last sanction

Present

book value

Realisable value

Inc valuati

on

Factory Land & Building measuring 1477 Yrd of Land with constructions of

Disha Engg Co Pvt Ltd

3.16 5.76 4.61 4.61 As per valuation report dt.

04.11.11 Existing

Page 57: Kriti Aggarwal

about 18500 Sq. Ft.. situated at Plot No. 219, Sector-24, Faridabad

04.11.11 of Sh.M B Bhagat Bank’s approved valuer

Factory Land & Building measuring 1477 Yrd of Land and Building. situated at Plot No. 218, Sector-24, Faridabad

Disha Engg Co Pvt Ltd

2.76 4.93 3.99 3.99 As per valuation report dt. 04.11.11 of Sh.M B Bhagat Bank’s approved valuer

04.11.11 Existing

Factory Land & Building measuring 3000 sq mts with constructions situated at Plot No. 54-55, Sector-6, Pant Nagar Industrial Estate, Rudrapur, Utrakhand.

Disha Engg Co Pvt Ltd

2.10 3.13 2.50 2.50 As per valuation report dt. 04.11.11 of Sh.M B Bhagat Bank’s approved valuer

04.11.11 Existing

TOTAL 11.10

Page 58: Kriti Aggarwal

Existing bank exposure of 922 lacs covered by 120 % of IP value collateral security but after enhancement total exposure of 1880 lacs remain covered by 59% .

The bank accepted the collateral of 59% because the company is dealing with the bank since past 3years. Also it has a good rating without any default. The major advantage is that the company is an SME and as per the SME guidelines, the minimum exposure of collateral is 50%.

Personal /Corporate Gurantee Rs in Lacs

Name of Guarantor

Relationship with borrower

Net Worth Immovable property Date of confidential report

Prev.

as at

31.03.10

Present

as at

31.03.11

Prev.

as at

31.03.10

Present

as at

31.03.11

Prev Present

Mr. J. S. Virdi Director 275.88 299.42 150.00 180.00 25.10.10

07.01.12

Mrs. Sukhwant Kaur

Director 289.65 300.00 150.00 180.00 25.10.10

07.01.12

Mr. Vivek Singh Virdi

Director 81.62 106.08 0 0 25.10.10

07.01.12

Mr. Anoop Singh Virdi

Director 69.98 71.50 0 0 25.10.10

07.01.12

POSITION OF ACCOUNTS as on: 28.01.2012

(Rs. in lacs)

Nature Limit* VS DP Balance Irregularity

Cash Credit(87-355) 535.00+

Ad hoc 150.00*

65.00

1165.57 874.00 678.32 Nil

Page 59: Kriti Aggarwal

Cash Credit(87-425)

Term Loan – (Rudrapur)

Term Loan – (2912)

Term loan – (2976)

Term loan – (3036)

BG/LC

200.00

50.00

120.00

68.00

100.00

231.58

250.00

72.00

161.00

92.00

173.68

31.70

31.77

99.86

60.96

52.72

31.70

30.50

99.86

59.79

92.43

Nil

Nil

Nil

Nil

NIL

NIL

Term Loans from other Banks/Financial Institutions/Other Institutions - (including Lease, ICDs, Corporate Loans, Debentures etc.)—All accounts are running regular and no overdue as on 31.12.2011

Summary of cost of project and means of finance: Rs.crores

Purpose Purchase of Machinery

Cost of Project 3.33

Total Debt 2.50

Promoter’s contribution (Internal Accruals)

0.83 (25%)

Proposed TL (our share) 2.50

DER for this project 3.01

DER present company as a whole 0.56

DER proposed company as a whole

0.40

Repayment Period 60 Months

Door to door tenor 69 Months (From first Disbursal)

Page 60: Kriti Aggarwal

T/L shall be disbursed in 2 installments of RS 50 Lacs up to 31.03.2012 and balance up to Sep 2012

Security Margin (Fixed Asset Coverage Ratio – for term loans) : NA

Existing Proposed

Nature Book value FACR Book Value FACR on project completion

Primary 852.37 3.84 1185 2.51

PRICING

Interest on CC- BR+3.50 % - 0.50% (SMERA Ratng) = 13.75% subject to change as per bank / RBI guidelines

Interest on fresh TL BR+3.50 %+0.50% TP - 0.50% (SMERA Ratng) = 14.25% subject to change as per bank / RBI guidelines

Processing Fee- CARD RATES Upfront FEE - CARD RATES

Existing bank exposure of 922 lacs covered by 120 % of IP value collateral security but after enhancement total exposure of 1880 lacs remain covered by 59% .

The bank accepted the collateral of 59% because the company is dealing with the bank since past 3years. Also it has a good rating without any default. The major advantage is that the company is an SME and as per the SME guidelines, the minimum exposure of collateral is 50%.

Facilities Recommended FOR ENHANCEMENT:

(Rs. in LACS)

Nature Existing Proposed

Fund Based

CC(H) 600 1000 Secured

CC(H) –Ad hoc 150 Nil Secured

WCTL NIL NIL Secured

Page 61: Kriti Aggarwal

FOBP/FOUBP/FABC

Others (Sanctioned Limit)

Fund Based Ceiling 600 1000 Secured

Non Fund Based

ILC/FLC *100 *400 Secured

ILG/ FLG *100 *50 Secured

Non Fund Based Ceiling *100 *400 Secured

Term Loan – (Existing) Outstanding

Balance

222 222 Secured

Term Loan –Fresh for machinery - 250 Secured

Term Loan-Total 222

472

TOTAL COMMITMENT (Fund & Non-Fund Based)

922 1872 Secured

* ILC/FLC and ILG Limits are to be permitted as 100% interchangeable within limit of Rs.400 lac

JUSTIFICATION

1. Justification for Fund Based Limits –

CC Facilities of Rs. 1000.00 Lacs

The operations of the company has shown substantial growth and this momentum is expected to continue for the current year, as the Company targets a Gross Sales of Rs. 70.00 Crores and Rs.80.50 crores for the financial year ended 31.03.12 and 31.03.13 respectively which shows growth of 33% and 15% over the sales of 52.59 Crores as on 31.03.11. In this current year in first half year sales have been achived of RS 3399 lacs and projected sales of 7000 seems achievable

Page 62: Kriti Aggarwal

The holding period of Raw Material is 1.89 months during 2011 and they are projected to be 1.30 months during 2012-13. The holding period of Raw Material has been projected at lower than 2011 because out of total purchases of raw material of Rs.4131 lacs during 2011, approx.40% purchases were done in the last four months so as to meet the demand of vendors for goods to be supplied during April’12 onwards thus rising the average holding period during 2011-12. As the co. has already purchased the raw material therefore the holding period of 1.30 months for 2011-12/12-13 is justified and accepted by the branch

The holding period of Stock in Process is 2.60 months during 2011 and they are projected to be 1.50 months during 2012-13. The holding is projected on lower side because the Co. was using 95% Forging material and 5% Sheet Metal during 2011 and now it is shifting from Forging Material to Sheet Metal in the ratio of 75:25 respectively because in Forging material the Work-in-progress is more than 2.50 months as the same is to be got done through outsourcing whereas in the case of Sheet Metal the WIP is 10-15 days thus reducing the holding period of Stock-in-process.

The Sundry Creditors is 2.59 months as on 31.03.11 and is estimated to further reduce to 1.50 months in the current year ended 31.03.12 as suppliers are increasingly resorting to lower credit periods, release of enhanced limits and introduction of capital.

The Company’s Receivable Periods is 1.60 months as on 31.03.11 which is mainly due to lower credit offered to new clients added during the period. However, M&M remains the largest contributor to the Company’s sale with more than 60% of share and the company has limited bargaining with them since it is also amongst the oldest client and thereby subscribing to older credits. Therefore the Debtors have been accepted for a period of 1.65 months during 2012-13.As on 31.03.11, the co. is having only 4.21% debtors above 90 days.

2. Justification for Non Fund based limits (ILC/ILG) -400 Lacs

Rs.lacs

Total purchases of raw material 2012-13

6043.65

Usance period of LC 3 MonthsTime gap in opening of LC and dispatch of material

6 days (6/30)=0.2 month

Purchases proposed on LC 25% 1510.91LC requirement for 2012-13 (1510.91*3.2)/12=402.91

lacs say Rs.400 lacs

Page 63: Kriti Aggarwal

3. Justification for term loan – Fresh TL of Rs 2.50 crore - The company requires a fresh loan of Rs.2.50 crores for purchase of plant & machinery for meeting its new orders in hand from its main vendors. Average DSCR from 31.03.2011 to 31.03.2018 comes to 2.77 which is acceptable

TEV of the project – Branch vide letter dated 23.01.2012 informed that TEV is not required as this is an existing unit going for capacity expansion for which it requires to install new machinery

4. Justification of other Issues ROI- Concession of 0.50% applicable as CRISIL has allotted SE-1A rating (Highest)

valid up to 02.011.12 ( Cir no 130/2012) branch vide mail dated 27.01.2012 confirmed that the account will remain in MSME after proposed expansion

Processing Fee – Branch has recommended for 50% concession in processing fee in NFB but no justification in the proposal hence concession is not proposed

Upfront Fee - Branch has recommended for 25 % concession in processing fee in upfront fee but no justification in the proposal hence concession is not proposed

Terms and conditions of previous sanction not complied – Current ratio to remain 1.25 of 31.03.2011 but in actual it is 1.07. Now party propose to bring it to 1.25 on 31.03.2012 & 1.33 on 31.03.2013 by induction of fresh capital / internal accruals/ long term funds .

In view of the AGM- Branch recommendations and reply of observations for enhancement of limits the proposal may be discussed in Credit Committee before placing it for approval of CH for the followings:

Enhancement of FB limits from 600 lacs to 1000 lacs Enhancement of NFB limits from 100 lacs to 400 lacs Additional T/L of RS 250 Lacs for purchase of machinery with total cost of 333 Lacs

Additional Stipulation

Branch to take undertaking from the party to increase the capital by 141.50 lacs in addition to additional long term funds to bring the current Ratio to 1.33 by 31.03.2012 otherwise panel interest will be charged for non compliance.

Enhanced limits will be released after introduction of required funds to bring the current ratio to 1.33

As recommended by branch CC facilities of 800 lacs to be allowed up to 31.03.2012 AGM – Branch to ensure that prices of the machineries proposed are competitive,

Supplier are genuine and verification of end use to be done and kept on record Company to close the accounts with KOTAK Mahindra Bank and HDFC bank and

undertake to deal exclusively with us.

Senior Manager AGM- Credit

Page 64: Kriti Aggarwal

CREDIT COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS .The above proposal was discussed in the Credit Committee meeting held on ............... and Committee recommended for approval of the note

Senior Manager(Convener)

Chief Manager- Credit

AGM – RMD Chief Manager-

Non Credit

In view of above study and depending upon risk rating, security and Bank guidelines, we may accept the proposal as above, for meeting the credit needs of company to run the business.

Page 65: Kriti Aggarwal

ANNEXURES

Calculation of Working Capital by MPBF

Particulars 31/03/11Audited

31.03.12 Estimated

31.03.13 Projected

Sales 5259.36 7000.00 8050( % age growth) 53.63 33.10 15Cost of Sales 4578.75 6047.33 6949.54Cost of Production 4581.81 6065.82 6953.3Raw Material holding 4050.80 4889.35 5930.82Basic Data (value per month)Sales 438.28 583.33 670.83Cost of Sales 381.56 503.94 579.13Cost of Production 381.82 505.49 579.44RMC 337.57 407.45 494.24Holding LevelsRaw Material Consumption 1.89 1.30 1.30WIP 2.60 1.50 1.50Finished Goods 0.02 0.05 0.05Receivables 1.60 1.65 1.65Chargeable Current AssetsRaw Material 636.74 529.68 642.51WIP 990.83 758.23 869.16Finished Goods 6.71 25.20 28.96Sundry Debtors 699.41 962.50 1106.88Chargeable Current Assets 2333.69 2275.61 2647.51Other Current Assets 155.49 43.61 38.59Total Current Assets 2489.18 2319.22 2686.10Other Current Liabilities 1727.38 877.64 1043.61Working Capital Gap 761.80 1441.58 1642.49NWC 166.55 441.58 642.49PBF 595.25 1000.00 1000.00

Build up of NWCCapital + Reserves 692.67 1127.83 1405.68Term Liabilities 375.72 440.19 427.24Total 1068.39 1568.02 1832.92Net Block 852.37 1084.58 1138.57NCA 49.47 41.86 51.86Total 901.84 1126.44 1190.43NWC 166.55 441.58 642.49

Purchase 4050.80 4889.35 5930.82

Page 66: Kriti Aggarwal

Purchase/Month 337.57 407.45 494.24Creditors 954.28 601.77 760.49Creditors/Holding 2.83 1.48 1.54

Calculation of Financial Ratios

Particulars31/03/11Audited

31.03.12 Estimated

31.03.13 Projected

Share Capital 255.5 397 397Reserves/Surplus 437.17 730.83 1008.68Deffered Tax Liability 0.00 0.00 0.00Net Worth 692.67 1127.83 1405.68Term LiabilitiesSecured Loans 260.70 0.00 0.00Unsecured Loans 115.02 0.00 0.00

375.72 440.19 427.24Current LiablitesWorking Capital 595.38 1000.00 1000.00Sundry Creditors 954.28 601.77 760.49Adv. Payments 0.80 0.00 0.00Statutory Liablities 15.72 16.00 17.00Other CL 756.58 259.87 266.12

2322.76 1877.64 2043.61Total Liabilities 3391.15 3445.66 3876.53

Fixed Assets 1338.77 1676.11 1846.11Depreciation to date 486.40 591.53 707.54Net Block 852.37 1084.58 1138.57Current AssetsInventories 1634.28 1313.11 1540.63Sundry Debtors 699.41 962.50 1106.88Cash & Bank balance 68.80 13.61 1.59Other Current Assets 86.69 30.00 37.00

2489.18 2319.22 2686.10Non-current AssetsInvestments 37.61 30.00 40.00Security Deposits 11.86 11.86 11.86Margin Money 0.00 0.00 0.00Other NCA 0.00 0.00 0.00

49.47 41.86 51.86Total Assets 3391.02 3445.66 3876.53Sales Turnover 5259.36 7000.00 8050

Page 67: Kriti Aggarwal

Other income 9.44 0.00 0.00Profit before tax 202.68 363.90 418.39Provision for taxes 41.36 70.24 110.76Profit after tax 161.32 293.66 307.63Depreciation 99.13 105.13 116.01Cash profit 260.45 398.79 423.64

Intangible Assets 0.00 0.00 0.00TNW 692.67 1127.83 1405.68Current Ratio 1.07 1.24 1.31Debt/Equity 0.54 0.39 0.30NWC 166.42 441.58 642.49TOL/TNW 3.90 2.06 1.76PBT/Sales 3.85 5.20 5.20Long Term Sources 1068.39 1568.02 1832.92Long term uses 901.84 1126.44 1190.43Surplus\Deficit 166.55 441.58 642.49Short Term Sources 2322.76 1877.64 2043.61Short Term Uses 2489.18 2319.22 2686.10Surplus/Deficit -166.42 -441.58 -642.49

Page 68: Kriti Aggarwal

RECOMMENDATIONS

The Credit Department at PNB Circle Office Delhi, works at its full potential and the staff is

highly experienced and has a very strong intuitive sense. So, there is no such

recommendation on the entire process. However to make the process more flexible and

efficient it is important to keep following things in mind:-

Electronic database should be designed carrying all the available and important information related to the proposals accepted. This will help reduce paperwork and loss of information.

Financial Analysis is not the only requirement-overall analysis is must. Updating on technology and tools is a must be it individual or organization. Understanding the nature of business and the market conditions is crucial for effective

credit appraisal Real time communication with clients helped me enhance my communication skills. Decent understanding of the credit appraisal techniques.

Page 69: Kriti Aggarwal

CONCLUSION

The study at PNB gave a vast learning experience to me and has helped to enhance my

knowledge. During the study I learnt how the theoretical financial analysis aspects are used in

practice during the working capital finance and term loan assessment. I have realized during

my project that a credit analyst must own multi-disciplinary talents like financial, technical as

well as legal know-how.

The credit appraisal for business loans has been devised in a systematic way. It is a process of

appraising the credit worthiness of loan applicants. Thus it extremely important for the lender

bank to assess the risk associated with credit; thereby ensure the security for the funds

deposited by the depositors. There are clear guidelines on how the credit analyst or lending

officer has to analyze a loan proposal. It includes phase-wise analysis which consists of 6

phases:

1. Financial statement analysis

2. Working capital and its assessment techniques

3. Techno Economic Feasibility Analysis

4. Credit risk assessment

5. Documentation

6. Loan administration

Punjab National Bank’s adoptions of the Projected Balance Sheet method (CMA) of

assessment procedures are based on sound principles of lending. This method of assessment

has certain flexibility required to avoid any rigid approach to fixing quantum of finance. The

PBS method have been rationalized and simplified to facilitate complete flexibility in

decision-making.

Page 70: Kriti Aggarwal

REFERENCES

IBA-FICCI-BCG report

PNB Journals (For internal circulation only)

Credit Management & Risk Policy

Loans & Advances Circulars on

a. BPLR

b. Project Finance

c. Industry Rating

d. Loaning Powers and Guidelines for exercising such powers

RBI Circulars and Guidelines

Guidelines on Credit Appraisal

Basel II Accord

Base Rate

www.pnb.co.in


Recommended