+ All Categories
Home > Documents > KSUs Quality Enhancement Plan. Current Core Requirement 2.12 The institution has developed an...

KSUs Quality Enhancement Plan. Current Core Requirement 2.12 The institution has developed an...

Date post: 19-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: cornelius-norris
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
To assure that global learning rises to the top of KSU’s educational priorities and learning outcomes by 2012

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript

KSUs Quality Enhancement Plan Current Core Requirement 2.12 The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that (1) includes a broadbased institutional process identifying key issues emerging from institutional assessment, (2) focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution, (3) demonstrates institutional capability for the initiation, implementation, and completion of the QEP, (4) includes broadbased involvement of institutional constituencies in the development and proposed implementation of the QEP, and (5) identifies goals and a plan to assess their achievement. (Quality Enhancement Plan) Proposed revised Core Requirement and new Comprehensive Standard 1. Proposed Revision to Core Requirement 2.12, Quality Enhancement Plan The institution has developed an acceptable Quality Enhancement Plan (QEP) that includes an institutional process for identifying key issues emerging from institutional assessment and focuses on learning outcomes and/or the environment supporting student learning and accomplishing the mission of the institution. 2. Proposed New Comprehensive Standard The institution has developed a Quality Enhancement Plan that (1) demonstrates institutional capability for the initiation, implementation, and completion of the QEP; (2) includes broadbased involvement of institutional constituencies in the development and proposed implementation of the QEP; and (3) identifies goals and a plan to assess their achievement. To assure that global learning rises to the top of KSUs educational priorities and learning outcomes by 2012 Tracking Progress Goal 1: Broad-based Cabinet-led Leadership Will be Tracked and Ensure Success of the QEP Goal 2: Global Learning Opportunities and Specialists Will Be Identified and Tracked Goal 3: Financial Support for Global Learning Initiatives Will Be Identified and Tracked Goal 4: Global Learning Competencies of Students Will Be Identified, Certified and Tracked Expanding Opportunities Goal 5: Degree and Student Success Programs Will Strengthen Global Learning Opportunities, Outcomes, and Achievements Goal 6: Campus-wide Financial Support for Global Learning Initiatives Will Double Goal 7: Infrastructure for Global Learning Will Expand Substantially in Personnel, Technology, and Library Resources Expanding Participation Goal 8: Promotion of Global Learning and its Value Will Expand Substantially Goal 9: Incentives, Awards and Professional Development Programs for Global Learning Will Be Substantial and Broad-based Goal 10: Campus-wide Engagement in Global Learning Will Increase Greatly Track and encourage Colleges to increase the number of academic degree programs that have a global learning focus Track and encourage all academic degree programs to refine global learning outcomes for their majors Track and encourage Colleges and academic degree programs to increase the number of new or revised courses that contain 30%+ Global Learning content Collect evidence of achievement of global learning outcomes within these courses Encourage programs to align course assignments and other experiences (e.g., study abroad, service learning) with the requirements for Global Engagement Certification Encourage programs to develop advising sheets for all majors for obtaining Global Engagement Certification Track and encourage Colleges and academic degree programs to identify, develop, and/or hire faculty who self- identify as Global Learning Specialists or Global Learning Contributors Encourage Colleges and departments to acknowledge faculty contributions to global learning initiatives in faculty assignments and promotion & te nure guidelines Presidents Cabinet Executive Director of IGI/Director of CSP Accreditation Liaison Global Learning Coordinating Council (GLCC) Faculty, Staff and Students Provide concentrated and dedicated leadership and administration facilitation to the achievement of the QEPs purpose and goals for the college/unit they represent Facilitate communication and QEP work distribution among deans, chairs and student success directors Need adequate reassigned time, support and recognition Place QEP goals as a standing agenda item for departmental meetings & strategic planning Encourage development of new/revised GL courses Contribute to leadership in GL programming, research, student teaching abroad, education abroad, etc. Develop/Hire GL Specialist/Contributors Recognize faculty for their Global Learning efforts in ARDs and FRDs Actively partner with your GLCC Coordinator Annual Departmental Reports 1. Develop QEP Objectives within YOUR strategic plan Due to GL Coordinator by end of August 2. QEP Annual Report- Due by end of April University wide Reports 1. Mid-Review due Spring Final Review due 2012


Recommended