+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory...

Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory...

Date post: 12-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: eleanore-nash
View: 219 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
16
Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial Buildings: Can We Make The Economics Work?
Transcript
Page 1: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Kyle Siler-EvansCarnegie Mellon University

Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy

2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting

Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial Buildings: Can We Make The Economics Work?

Page 2: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Areas of Research

2

Marginal emissions rates of the US electricity system

Comparison of emissions benefits from various demand- and supply-side interventions in the electricity industry

Strategies for improving the economics of cogeneration

Page 3: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

The Current System…

η ~ 35%

η ~ 90%

η ~ 80%

3

Page 4: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Cogeneration is ~30% More Efficient

4

ηthermal ~ 45%

ηelectrical ~ 35%

Page 5: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Slow Adoption of Small-Scale Cogeneration Cogeneration is a high risk, low return

investment. Large capital expense Huge uncertainties in future fuel and

electricity prices

5

Page 6: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Case Study: Large Hospital In Newark, NJCase Study Building 150,000 sq. ft. hospital $850,000 annually for heating and electricity

Cogeneration Unit 300 kWe reciprocating engine (natural gas-fired) Capital Cost: $600,000 Net Efficiency=79% Discount rate=12%

6

Page 7: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Model Overview

7

Engineering/Economic Model

Building Thermal/Electrical

Demand Profile(hourly)

Fuel & Electricity Prices

Cogen Operating Schedule

Net Present Value of Cogen

Inputs Outputs

Page 8: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Historic Fuel & Electricity Prices

8

Page 9: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Cogen: High Risk, Low Return

9

Expected Return

High Risk

Page 10: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

10

Increasing Revenue to Cogen

Page 11: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Decreasing risks

11

Page 12: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Economies of Scale

12

Page 13: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Insights/Conclusions

We can design mechanisms to increase the revenue and decrease the risks to a cogeneration project.

Improving the economics of cogeneration may mean decreasing the efficiency.

13

Page 14: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Decision Makers

14

Clarifying the legal status of microgrids will require action from state legislatures FERC and state PUCs should play an active role in

designing rules and regulations for microgrids Depending on the region, small-scale DG may

or may not be able to earn revenue through ancillary services FERC, state PUCs, and electricity system operators

all have a role in creating or removing barriers to entry

Enacting a national program to price CO2 emissions requires federal legislation

Page 15: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Acknowledgments

15

Advisors: Granger Morgan and Inês Lima Azevedo

This research was supported by a grant from the Gordon Moore Foundation and by the Center for Climate and Energy Decision Making (CEDM), which is supported under a cooperative agreement between the National Science Foundation (SES-0949710) and Carnegie Mellon University.

Page 16: Kyle Siler-Evans Carnegie Mellon University Dept. of Engineering & Public Policy 2011 CEDM Advisory Board Meeting Distributed Cogeneration for Commercial.

Thank You

Questions?

16


Recommended