Date post: | 02-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | barry-nichols |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 4 times |
L. Alan Winters
Chief EconomistDepartment for International Development, London,
andProfessor of Economics, University of Sussex, UK
Where does the crisis leave globalisation?
Page 227th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Disclaimer
The opinions expressed in this work are the author’s alone and may not represent those of his employers.
Page 327th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Globalisation
• In principle – the extent to which one’s fate is determined abroad
• In practice: simple pragmatic definition• Extent of commercial intercourse with RoW• Also, loosely, the policy stance associated
with achieving relatively high levels of intercourse.
Page 427th January 2010 University of Nottingham
TradeTrade (X+M) as % GDP
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
1960
1963
1966
1969
1972
1975
1978
1981
1984
1987
1990
1993
1996
1999
2002
2005
per
cen
t
Source: World Development Indicators, Online
Page 527th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Foreign Direct InvestmentForeign direct investment, net inflows (% of GDP)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
per
cen
t
Page 627th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Portfolio Investment
Portfolio Investment as % of GDP
-1%
0%
1%
1%
2%
2%
3%
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
per
cen
t
Page 727th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Remittances
Remittances as % of GDP
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
per
cen
t
Page 827th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Economic Growth
GDP, PPP, 1995 prices
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
1950
1954
1958
1962
1966
1970
1974
1978
1982
1986
1990
1994
1998
2002
2006
Page 927th January 2010 University of Nottingham
The Financial Crisis• Financial stress since August 2007
• Northern Rock • Wholesale creditors’ problems
• Crash September 2008 • Lehman Brothers• AIG, etc• Solvency, not just liquidity
• Followed by ………
Page 1027th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Recession• Worst for 80 years• ¾% off world GDP for 2008• About 5% in 2009, • Stock markets 40-60% off• Citi, BoA, RBS need rescuing• Oil price from $147 to $40• Diamond prices fall by 80%• World trade falls by 12% in 2009
Page 1127th January 2010 University of Nottingham
How Deep, How Long?• 2009 was less bad than expected in March
• 2% GDP growth for developing economies • India 5.6%; China 8.5%• LICs in Africa > 4% growth
• 2010 recovery to 3.9% (DCs 6%) – IMF• World trade growth resumes - 6%
• Strong policy response• But not all over – by a long way
The opinions expressed in this
work are the author’s alone.
Page 1227th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Real Output Growth
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012
%
Emerging & developing economies
Advanced Economies
Source: IMF
A Global Crisis
Page 1327th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Real Output Growth
-7
-5
-3
-1
1
3
5
7
9
11
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
%
Sub-Saharan Africa Central and Eastern EuropeCIS Developing Asia Western Hemisphere
Source: IMF
Significant Regional Variation
Page 1427th January 2010 University of Nottingham
World Trade (monthly US$ billion)
1250
1000
750
500
250
250
500
750
1000
1250
1250 1000 750 500 250 250 500 750 1000 1250
2007
2008
2009
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
SeptemberOctober
November
December
Sources: IMF staff estimates.
Page 1527th January 2010 University of Nottingham
The Causes of the Crisis• Two necessary conditions
Regulatory laxness
Global imbalances
Page 1627th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Whence it came (I) Global Imbalances
• Huge labour force growth• Asian Crisis 1997-8
• Export led recovery; Reserves for insurance• Structural challenges
• Export led growth; Lack of social protection• Accommodating policy in advanced
economies• Saving the world • Hedonism • Hubris
Page 1727th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Whence it came (II) Regulation & Policy
• Loose monetary & fiscal policy• In response to previous crises;
• Financial innovation to boost returns• Weak risk management; Perverse incentives• Strong lobbying & political connections
• Regulatory failures• Unwarranted confidence; wrong model?• Political weakness – unwillingness to hear
Page 1827th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Developing Countries are Coupled
• the direct impact of the financial collapse • the tightening of credit,
• Trade credit, investment• Aid flows
• the effects on the real economy • Exports, commodity prices (terms of trade),
remittances, • knock-on effects: fiscal, financial
Page 1927th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Transmission channels• Trade: -12.3% (volume) 2009 y-o-y• Remittances: 6.1% fall in 2009 • Net Capital Flows:
•Peaked at $1.2 trillion in 2007. Expected to fall to $460 bn in 2009
• Official Development Assistance: •Ireland; Italy; Sweden; Netherlands; Denmark
Page 2027th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Policy Responses• Stimulus packages:
• US, UK, China, India, ….• Bangladesh, Vietnam, ….• Many others maintained expenditures –
benefits of sound fiscal positions• Monetary expansion in advanced econ.s• International
• Swap arrangements with Fed• IMF resources• Other IFIs
Page 2127th January 2010 University of Nottingham
What lies ahead (IMF analysis)
• Optimistic projections still not encouraging• Rebalancing: long drawn out process
• China’s consumption is only ¼ of that of US and EU deficit countries
• Germany and Japan have to increase S (not C) to deal with ageing populations
• Weak adjustment by surplus countries • Because surpluses largely intentional
• Low income countries too small to matter
Page 2227th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Projected Imbalances (IMF)
Page 2327th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Trade did boost growth pre-crisis
• Many pieces of evidence• Cross-country regressions• Time series – except perhaps in poorest Africa• Growth Commission narratives• Conditional on other policies/conditions
• Not sufficient, probably necessary
Page 2427th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Trade and GDP pc growth 1960-1995
Source: Feyrer, 2009
Page 2527th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Did capital flows stimulate growth?
• Balance in favour of FDI and bank lending• Little general evidence for portfolio inv.• ODA: mixed but on balance favourable• But:• Sudden stops disruptive (unjustified?) • Poor regulation or poor policy
• E.g. unmatched balance sheets, bubbles
Page 2627th January 2010 University of Nottingham
How damaging was the crisis?
• So far, …….• East Asia Pacific – 4 months growth• Africa 10 months (less for LICs)• CEE about 2 years; CIS 2.5 years
• Strongly related to quality of previous policy and financial exposure
Page 2727th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Did trade transmit the crisis? First Hit
Early impact
Late impact
not yet
total
low VS 19 36 27 82 high VS 40 32 11 83 total 59 68 38 165
Low VS – below median of sample (approx 43%)
Early: 2008, late 2009 Jan-Mar; not yet – no residual < -2σ
Page 2827th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Average Depth of First Hit
Low HighTotal -0.452 -0.311
RegionEAP -0.599 -0.201ECA -0.372 -0.431HIC -0.408 -0.284LAC -0.472 -0.390MNA -0.325 -0.355SAS -0.521 -0.210SSA -0.552 -0.333
Residual of log(exports) from trend
Page 2927th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Crises and Migration: 1860-1913
De-trended emigration rates Hatton and Williamson, 2007
Page 3027th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Migration now• Net immigration to US:1m p.a. in 2000-6
to 0.5m 2006-7. • Emigration from Mexico 1m Feb 06-07 to
0.8m Feb 07-08.• A8 emigration to the UK, down 54%
between Q1’08 and Q1’09, down 57% to Ireland.
• Outflows from Bangladesh – down by about 40% yr-on-yr.
Page 3127th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Capital Flows 2008-11 (IIF)
Page 3227th January 2010 University of Nottingham
Should we scale back globalisation?
• Nearly all markets worked well • financial markets didn’t
• Commodity markets? • Imperfect, but what alternative? Seize it.
• Financial markets • Regulate• Structure• Be cautious
Page 3327th January 2010 University of Nottingham
THANK YOU