+ All Categories
Home > Documents > L - Securitization

L - Securitization

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: kajaludi
View: 250 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 49

Transcript
  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    1/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill1

    Securitization

    Financial Institutions Management, 3/e

    By Anthony Saunders

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    2/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill2

    I.Introduction

    Securitization: Packaging and selling of loans andother assets backed by securities.

    Many types of loans and assets are being repackaged inthis fashion including royalties on recordings ( DavidBowie, Rod Stewart).

    Original use was to enhance the liquidity of theresidential mortgage market, and provide a source of

    fee income. It also helps to reduce the effect of regulatory taxes

    such as capital requirements, reserve requirements, anddeposit insurance premiums.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    3/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill3

    I.Introduction: Pass-Through

    Securities

    Government National Mortgage Association(GNMA)

    Sponsors MBS programs by FIs. Act as a guarantor to investors, i.e., it provides timing

    insurance. GNMA supports only those pools of mortgages that comprise

    mortgage loans whose default or credit risk is insured by one

    of three government agencies: VA, FHA, and FHM

    A.

    FNMA actually creates MBSs by purchasing andholding packages of mortgages on its balancesheet; it also issues bonds directly to finance thosepurchases.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    4/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill4

    I.Introduction: Pass-Through

    Securities

    Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Similar function to FNMA except major role has

    involved savings banks.

    Stockholder owned with line of credit from theTreasury.

    It buys mortgage loans from FIs and swaps MBSs forloans.

    It also sponsors conventional loan pools as well asFHA/VA mortgage pools and guarantees timely

    payment of interest and principal on the securities itissues.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    5/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill5

    II.Incentives and Mechanics of Pass-

    Through Security Creation

    1. To Reduce Regulatory Taxes: Create a mortgage pool from one-thousand, $100,000

    mortgages (Results in $100 million) with3

    0 years inmaturity and 12 percent interest rate.

    Each mortgage receives credit risk protection fromFHA.

    Capital requirement = $100m * .05 * .08 = $4 million

    (the risk-adjusted value of residential mortgages is 50%of face value and the risk-based capital requirement is8%).

    Must issue more than $96 million in liabilities due to a10% reserve requirements (106.67m = $96m/(1-0.1)).

    (+ FDIC premia).

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    6/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill6

    II.Incentives and Mechanics of Pass-

    Through Security Creation

    Reserve requirement = 10% * $106.67 = $10.67m,

    leaves $96m to fund the mortgages.

    FDIC insurance premium = $106.66m * .0027 =

    $287,982

    The three levels of regulatory taxes:

    1. Capital requirements;

    2. Reserve requirements;

    3. FDIC insurance premiums.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    7/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill7

    II.Incentives and Mechanics of Pass-

    Through Security Creation

    Bank Balance Sheet Before Securitization:

    Assets Liabilities

    ________________________________________________________

    Cash reserves $10.66 Demand Deposits$106.6

    Long-term mortgage $100.00 Capital $ 4.00

    ________________________________________________________

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    8/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill8

    II.Incentives and Mechanics of Pass-

    Through Security Creation

    Bank Balance Sheet after Securitization

    Assets Liabilities

    ________________________________________________________

    Cash reserves $10.66 Demand Deposits$106.6

    Cash proceeds from $100.00 Capital $ 4.00

    mortgage securitization

    ________________________________________________________

    A dramatic change in the balance sheet exposure of the bank:

    1. $100m illiquid mortgage loans have been replaced by $100m cash;2. The duration mismatch has been reduced;

    3. The bank has an enhanced ability to deal with and reduce itsregulatory taxes.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    9/49

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    10/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill10

    II. FurtherIncentives

    Investors ofGNMA securities are protectedagainst two levels of default risks:

    1. Default Risk by the Mortgages Through FHA/VA housing insurance,

    government agencies bear the risk of default.

    2.Default Risk by Bank/Trustee:

    G

    NM

    Awould bear the cost of making the promisingpayments in full and on time to GNMAbondholders.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    11/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill11

    II. FurtherIncentives

    Given the default protection, the returns toGNMA bondholders:

    _______________________________________Mortgage coupon rate = 12%

    - Service fee(to the bank) = 0.44

    - GNMA insurance fee = 0.06

    GNMA pass-through bond coupon = 11.50%

    ________________________________________

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    12/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill12

    III.Effects of Prepayments

    Sources of prepayment risk:

    1. Refinancing:

    For individuals in the pool to pay off old high-costmortgages and refinance at lower rates.

    Refinancing involves transaction costs and re-contracting costs.

    2.

    Housing Turnover: Due to a complex set of factors.

    Prepayment gives mortgage holders a veryvaluable call option on the mortgage when thisoption is in the money.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    13/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill13

    III.Effects of Prepayments

    The effect is to lower dramatically the principal

    and interest cash flows received in the later

    months of the pools life. Good news effects

    Lower market yields increase present value of cash

    flows.

    Principal received sooner.

    Bad news effects

    Fewer interest payments in total.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    14/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill14

    III.Effects of Prepayments

    Prepayments result of sales or refinancing.

    Since prepayment affects the cash flows to

    MBS, pricing models require estimates of the

    prepayment rates.

    Methods:

    Option pricing approach

    .

    Public Securities Association approach.

    Empirical approach.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    15/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill15

    III.Effects of Prepayments: PSA

    Model

    The PSA (Public Securities Association) model

    assumes that the prepayment rate starts at 0.2% per

    annum in the first month, increasing by 0.2

    % permonth for the first 30 months, until prepayment

    rate then levels off at a 6 % annualized rate for the

    remaining life of the pool.

    Issuers or investors who assume that their mortgagepool prepayment exactly match this pattern are said

    to assume 100 percent PSA behavior.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    16/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill16

    III.Effects of Prepayments: PSA

    Model

    Monthlyprepaymentrate (%)

    30

    360 Months

    125% PSA

    100% PSA

    75% PSA

    7 %

    6%

    4/2%

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    17/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill17

    III.Effects of Prepayments: PSA

    Model

    Actual prepayment rate may differ from

    PSAs assumed pattern: The level of the pools coupon relative to the current mortgage

    coupon rate;

    The age of the mortgage pool;

    Whether the payments are fully amortized;

    Assumability of mortgages in the pool.

    Size of the pool;

    Conventional or nonconventional mortgages;

    Geographical location;

    Age and job status of mortgagees in the pool.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    18/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill18

    III.Effects of Prepayments: PSA

    Model

    On approach to control these factors is by

    assuming some fixed deviation of any

    specific pool from PSAs assumed averageor benchmark pattern. E.g., one pool may

    be assumed to be 75% PSA, and another

    125% PSA. The formal has a lowerprepayment rate than historically

    experienced; the latter, a faster rate.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    19/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill19

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    OtherEmpirical Models

    Most empirical models are proprietary

    versions of the PSA model in which FIs

    make their own estimates of the pattern onmonthly prepayments.

    FIs begin by estimating a prepayment

    function from observing the experience ofmortgage holders prepaying during any

    particular period on mortgage pools.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    20/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill20

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    OtherEmpirical Models

    The conditional prepayment rates in month i forsimilar pools would be modeled as functions of

    economic variables driving prepayment; e.g

    ., pi =f(mortgage rate spread, age, collateral, geographic

    factors, burn-out factor).

    Once the frequency distribution of the pis isestimated, the bank can calculate the expectedcash flows on the mortgage pool underconsideration and estimate its fair yield given thecurrent market price of the pool.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    21/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill21

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    Option Model Approach

    Fair price on pass-through decomposable into two parts P

    GNMA = PTBOND - PPREPAYMENT OPTION

    Option-adjusted spread between GNMAs and T-bondsreflects value of a call option. Specifically, the abilityof the mortgage holder to prepay is equivalent to thebond investor writing a call option on the bond and themortgagee owning or buying the option. If interest

    rates fall, the option becomes more valuable as itmoves into the money and more mortgages are prepaidearly by having the bond called or the prepaymentoption exercised.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    22/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill22

    III.Effects of Prepayments: Option

    Model Approach

    In the yield dimension:

    YGNMA = YTBOND + YPREPAYMENT OPTION

    That is, the fair yield spread or option-

    adjusted spread (OAS) between GNMAsand T-bonds plus an additional yield forwriting the valuable call option.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    23/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill23

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    Option Model Approach

    Example: Smiths Model

    Assumptions: 1. The only reasons for prepayment are due to refinancing

    mortgage at lower rates;

    2. The current discount (zero-coupon) yield curve for T-bonds isflat;

    3. The mortgage coupon rate is 10% on an outstanding pool of

    mortgages with an outstanding principal balance of $1,000,000; 4. The mortgages have a 3-year maturity and pay principal and

    interest only once at the end of each year.

    5.Mortgage loans are fully amortized, and there is no service fee.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    24/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill24

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    Option Model Approach

    Thus the annually fully amortized payment

    under no prepayment conditions is:

    R = $1,000,000/(PVIFA 10%, 3 yrs) = $402,114.

    At the current mortgage rate of 9%, the GNMA bond

    would be selling at:

    P = $402,114 * (PVIFA 9%, 3 yrs) = $1,017,869.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    25/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill25

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    Option Model Approach

    6. Because of prepayment penalties and refinancing costs,

    mortgagees do not begin to prepay until mortgage rates fall

    3% or more below the mortgage coupon rate.

    7.Interest rate movements over time change a maximum

    of 1% up or down each year. The time path of interest

    rates follows a binomial process.

    8.With prepayment present, cash flows in any year can be

    the promised payment R = $402,411, the promisedpayment (R) plus repayment of any outstanding principal,

    or zero in all mortgages have been prepaid or paid off in

    the previous year.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    26/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill26

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    Option Model Approach

    End of Year 1: since interest rates can

    change up or down by 1% per annum,

    mortgages are not prepaid. GNMAbondholders receive the promised payment

    R=$401,114 with certainty.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    27/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill27

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    Option Model Approach

    End of Year2:There are three possible mortgagerates; 11%, 9%, and 7% with 25%, 50%, and 25%of probability.

    If prepayment occurs, the investor receives:

    R + principal balance remaining at the end of yr2= $402,114 + $365,561 = $767,675Thus CF2 = .25($767,675) + .75($402,114) =$493,504.15

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    28/49

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    29/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill29

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    Option Model Approach

    End of Year3: since there is a 25%

    probability that mortgages are prepaid in yr

    2, the investor will receive no cash flows atthe end of yr3. However, there is also a

    75% probability that mortgages will not be

    prepaid in yr2, the investor will receive thepromised payment R = $402,114.

    CF3 = .25($0) + .75($402,114) = $301,586

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    30/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill30

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    Option Model Approach

    Deviation of the Option-Adjusted Spread:

    The required yield on a GNMA with

    prepayment risk is divided into the requiredyield on T-bond plus a required spread for the

    prepayment call option given to the mortgage

    holders: E(CF1) E(CF2) E(CF3)

    P = ------------ + ------------- + -------------- (1+d1+Os) (1+d2+Os)

    2 (1+d3

    Os)3

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    31/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill31

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    Option Model Approach

    Deviation of the Option-Adjusted Spread:

    Where

    P= Price ofGNMA

    d1 = discount rate on 1-yr, zero T-bonds

    d2

    = discount rate on 2-yr, zeroT-bonds

    d3

    = discount rate on 3-yr, zeroT- bonds

    Os = option-adjusted spread on GNMA

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    32/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill32

    III.Effects of Prepayments:

    Option Model Approach

    Assume that the T-bond yield curve is flat, so that d1 = d2=d3

    = 8%; then

    $401,114 $493,504 $301,585 P = ------------ + ------------- + --------------

    (1+.08+Os) (1+.08+ Os)2 (1+.08+ Os)

    3

    Os = 0.96%; and

    YGNMA = YTBOND + Os = 8% + 0.96% = 8.96%

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    33/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 33

    IV. Collateralized Mortgage Obligation

    (CMO)

    CMO structure

    CMOs can be created either by packaging and

    securitizing whole mortgage loans or by placing

    existing pass-throughs in a trust.

    The investment bank or issuer creates the CMO to

    make a profit. The sum of the prices at which the

    CMO

    bond classes can be sold normally exceedsthat of the original pass-throughs.

    Prepayment effects differ across tranches.

    Improves marketability of the bonds.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    34/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 34

    IV. Collateralized Mortgage Obligation

    (CMO)

    The Value Additivity of CMOs:

    Suppose an investment bank buys a $150m

    issue ofGNMAs and places them in trust ascollateral. It then issues a CMO with:

    Class A: Annual fixed coupon 7%, class size $50m

    Class B: Annual fixed coupon 8%, class size 50m Class C: Annual fixed coupon 9%, class size $50m

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    35/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 35

    IV. Collateralized Mortgage Obligation

    (CMO)

    Assume that in month 1 the promised

    amortized cash flows on the mortgages are

    $1m but there is an additional $1.5m cashflows as a result of early prepayment.

    These are distributed to CMO holders as:

    Coupon payments: Class A (7%): $291,667

    Class B (8%): $333,333

    Class C (9%): $375,000

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    36/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 36

    IV. Collateralized Mortgage Obligation

    (CMO)

    Principal Payments:

    The $1.5m cash flows remaining will be paid to Class

    A holders to reduce its principal outstanding to$50m-$1.5m=$48.5m.

    Between 1.5 to 3 years after issue, Class A will be

    fully retired. The trust will continue to pay Class B

    and C holders the promised coupon payments of

    $333,333 and $375,000 monthly. Any cash flows

    over the promised coupons will be paid to retire Class

    B CMOs.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    37/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 37

    IV. Collateralized Mortgage Obligation

    (CMO)

    Class Z: This class has a stated coupon, such as

    10%, and accrues interest for the bondholders on

    a monthly basis at this rate. The trust does notpay this interest, however, until all other classes

    are fully retired. Then Z-class holders received

    coupon and principal payments plus accruedinterest payments. Thus, Z-class has

    characteristics of both a zero-coupon bond and a

    regular bond.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    38/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 38

    IV. Collateralized Mortgage Obligation

    (CMO)

    Class R: CMOs tend to be over-collaterized:

    CMO issuers normally uses very conservative

    prepayment assumptions. If prepayments are slowerthan expected, there is often excess collateral left

    over when all regular classes are retired.

    Trustees often reinvest cash flows in the period prior

    to paying interest on the CMOs. The higher the

    interest rate and the timing of coupon intervals is

    semiannual rather than monthly, the larger the

    excess collateral.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    39/49

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    40/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 40

    V.Mortgage-Backed Bonds

    (MBBs)

    Differs from pass-throughs and CMOs intwo key dimensions:

    1.While pass-throughs and CMOs removemortgages from balance sheets, MBBsnormally remain on the balance sheet.

    2. Pass-throughs and CMOs have a direct link

    between the cash flow on the underlyingmortgages, with MBBs the relationship is oneof collateralization.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    41/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 41

    V.Mortgage-Backed Bonds

    (MBBs)

    Normally remain on the balance sheet and

    over-collaterized to reduce funding costs.__________________________________________________________________Assets Liabilities

    __________________________________________________________________

    Long-term Mortgages $20 Insurance Deposits $10

    Uninsured Deposits $10

    __________________________________________________________________Collateral $12 MBB $10

    OtherMortgages $ 8 Insured Deposits $10

    __________________________________________________________________

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    42/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 42

    V.Mortgage-Backed Bonds

    (MBBs)

    Regulatory concerns: the bank gains only

    because the FDIC is willing to bear enhanced

    credit risk through its insurance guarantees todepositors.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    43/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 43

    V.Mortgage-Backed Bonds

    (MBBs)

    Other drawbacks to MBBs:

    MBB ties up mortgages on the balance sheet.

    The need to overcollaterize to ensure a high-qualitycredit risk rating.

    By keeping mortgages on the balance sheet, the

    bank continues to be liable for capital adequacy and

    reserve requirement taxes.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    44/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 44

    VI.Innovations in Securitization

    Pass-through strips

    IO strips: The owner of an IO strip has a claim to the

    present value of interest payments by themortgagees. When interest rates change, they affect

    the cash flows received on mortgages:

    Discount Effect: As interest rates fall, the present value of

    any cash flows received on the strip rises, increasing thevalue of the IO strips.

    Prepayment Effect: As interest rates fall, mortgagees

    prepay their mortgages. The number ofIO payments the

    investor receives is likely to shrink, which reduces the

    value ofIO bonds.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    45/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 45

    VI.Innovations in Securitization

    IO Strip (continued):

    Specifically, one can expect that as interest rates fall

    below the mortgage coupon rate, the prepaymenteffect gradually dominates the discount effect, so

    that over some range of the price or value ofIO

    bond falls as interest rates fall (negative duration).

    The negative duration IO bond is a very valuable

    asset as a portfolio-hedging device.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    46/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 46

    VI.Innovations in Securitization

    PO strip: the mortgage principal components of

    each monthly payment, which include the monthly

    amortized payment and any early prepayments. Discount Effect: As yields fall, the present value of any

    principal payments must increase and the value of the PO

    strip rises.

    Prepayment

    Effect: As yields fall, the mortgage holderspay off principal early. The PO bond holders received

    the fixed principal balance outstanding earlier than stated.

    This works to increase the value of the PO strip.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    47/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 47

    VI.Innovations in Securitization

    PO Strip (Continued):

    As interest rates fall, both the discount and

    prepayment effects point to a rise in the valueof PO strip. The price-yield curve reflects an

    inverse relationship, but with a steeper slope

    than for normal bonds; I.e., PO strip bond

    values are very interest rate sensitive, especiallyfor yields below the stated mortgage coupon

    rate.

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    48/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 48

    VI.Innovations in Securitization

    Securitization of other assets

    CARDs (Certificates of Amortized Revolving

    Debts)

    Various receivables, loans, junk bonds, ARMs.

    VII C All A B

  • 8/6/2019 L - Securitization

    49/49

    Irwin/McGraw-Hill 49

    VII. Can All Assets Be

    Securitized?

    Benefits Costs

    ___________________________________________________________

    1 New funding source 1. Cost of public/private credit risk

    insurance and guarantees

    2.Increased liquidity of bank loans 2. Cost of overcollateralization

    3.Enhanced ability to manage the 3. Valuation and packaging costs

    duration gap (the cost of asset heterogeneity)

    4.

    I

    f off=balance-sheet, the issueron reserve requirements, deposit

    insurance premiums, and capital

    adequacy requirements

    ___________________________________________________________


Recommended