1
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia
Chapter 10
Organisational Structure and Design
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 2
Defining organisational structure and design
Organisational structureThe formal arrangement of jobs within an organisation.
Organisational designA process involving decisions about six key elements:
Work specializationDepartmentalizationChain of commandSpan of controlcentralisation and decentralisationFormalization
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 3
Organisational structure
Work specialisationThe degree to which tasks in the organisation are divided into separate jobs with each step completed by a different person.
Overspecialization can result in human diseconomies from boredom, fatigue, stress, poor quality, increased absenteeism, and higher turnover.
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 4
Departmentalisation by type
Functional Grouping jobs by functions performed
ProductGrouping jobs by product line
GeographicGrouping jobs on the basis of territory or geography
Process Grouping jobs on the basis of product or customer flow
CustomerGrouping jobs by type of customer and needs
2
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 5
Functional departmentalisation
• Advantages• Efficiencies from putting together similar specialties and people
with common skills, knowledge, and orientations• Coordination within functional area• In-depth specialization
• Disadvantages• Poor communication across functional areas• Limited view of organisational goals
Figure 10.2a Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 6
Geographical departmentalisation
• Advantages• More effective and efficient handling of specific
regional issues that arise• Serve needs of unique geographic markets better
• Disadvantages• Duplication of functions• Can feel isolated from other organisational areas
Figure 10.2b
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 7
Product departmentalisation
+ Allows specialisation in particular products and services+ Managers can become experts in their industry+ Closer to customers– Duplication of functions– Limited view of organisational goalsSource: Bombardier Annual Report.
Figure 10.2c Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 8
Process departmentalisation
+ More efficient flow of work activities– Can only be used with certain types of products
Figure 10.2d
3
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 9
Customer departmentalisation
+ Customers’ needs and problems can be met by specialists- Duplication of functions- Limited view of organisational goals
Figure 10.2e Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 10
Organisation structure (cont’d)
Chain of commandThe continuous line of authority that extends from upper levels of an organisation to the lowest levels of the organisation and clarifies who reports to who.
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 11
Organisation structure (cont’d)
AuthorityThe rights inherent in a managerial position to tell people what to do and to expect them to do it.
ResponsibilityThe obligation or expectation to perform.
Unity of commandThe concept that a person should have one boss and should report only to that person.
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 12
Organisation structure (cont’d)
Span of controlThe number of employees who can be effectively and efficiently supervised by a manager.Width of span is affected by:
Skills and abilities of the managerEmployee characteristicsCharacteristics of the work being doneSimilarity of tasksComplexity of tasksPhysical proximity of subordinatesStandardization of tasks
4
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 13
Contrasting spans of control
Figure 10.3 Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 14
Organisation structure (cont’d)
CentralisationThe degree to which decision-making is concentrated at a single point in the organisations.
organisations in which top managers make all the decisions and lower-level employees simply carry out those orders.
Decentralisationorganisations in which decision-making is pushed down to the managers who are closest to the action.
Employee EmpowermentIncreasing the decision-making,
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 15
Factors that influence the amount of centralisation
More CentralisationEnvironment is stable.
Lower-level managers are not as capable or experienced at making decisions as upper-level managers.
Lower-level managers do not want to have a say in decisions.
Decisions are significant.
organisation is facing a crisis or the risk of company failure.
Company is large.
Effective implementation of company strategies depends on managers retaining say over what happens.
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 16
Factors that influence the amount of decentralisation
More decentralisationEnvironment is complex, uncertain.Lower-level managers are capable and experienced at making decisions.Lower-level managers want a voice in decisions.Decisions are relatively minor.Corporate culture is open to allowing managers to have a say in what happens.Company is geographically dispersed.Effective implementation of company strategies depends on managers having involvement and flexibility to make decisions.
5
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 17
Organisation structure (cont’d)
FormalisationThe degree to which jobs within the organisation are standardized and the extent to which employee behavior is guided by rules and procedures.
Highly formalized jobs offer little discretion over what is to be done.Low formalization means fewer constraints on how employees do their work.
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 18
Mechanistic versus organic organisation
Table 10.2
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 19
Structural contingency factors
Structural decisions are influenced by:Overall strategy of the organisation
organisational structure follows strategy.Size of the organisation
Firms change from organic to mechanistic organisations as they grow in size.
Technology use by the organisationFirms adapt their structure to the technology they use.
Degree of environmental uncertaintyDynamic environments require organic structures; mechanistic structures need stable environments.
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 20
Structural contingency factors (cont’d)
Strategy and structureAchievement of strategic goals is facilitated by changes in organisational structure that accommodate and support change.
Size and structureAs an organisation grows larger, its structure tends to change from organic to mechanistic with increased specialization, departmentalization, centralisation, and rules and regulations.
6
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 21
Structural contingency factors (cont’d)
Technology and structureorganisations adapt their structures to their technology.Woodward’s classification of firms based on the complexity of the technology employed:
Unit production of single units or small batchesMass production of large batches of outputProcess production in continuous process of outputs
Routine technology = mechanistic organisationsNon-routine technology = organic organisations
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 22
Woodward’s findings on technology, structure, and effectiveness
Table 10.3
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 23
Structural contingency factors (cont’d)
Environmental uncertainty and structure
Mechanistic organisational structures tend to be most effective in stable and simple environments.
The flexibility of organic organisational structures is better suited for dynamic and complex environments.
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 24
Common organisational designs
Traditional designsSimple structure
Low departmentalization, wide spans of control, centralised authority, little formalization
Functional structureDepartmentalization by function
Operations, finance, human resources, and product research and development
Divisional structureComposed of separate business units or divisions with limited autonomy under the coordination and control the parent corporation.
7
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 25
Strengths and weaknesses of common traditional organisational designs
Figure 10.4 Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 26
Organisational designs (cont’d)
Contemporary organisational designsTeam structures
The entire organisation is made up of work groups or self-managed teams of empowered employees.
Matrix and project structuresSpecialists for different functional departments are assigned to work on projects led by project managers.Matrix participants have two managers.
Project structuresEmployees work continuously on projects; moving on to another project as each project is completed.
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 27
A Matrix organisation in an aerospace firm
Figure 10.6 Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 28
Organisational designs (cont’d)
Contemporary organisational designs (cont’d)
Boundaryless organisationAn flexible and unstructured organisational design that is intended to break down external barriers between the organisation and its customers and suppliers.Removes internal (horizontal) boundaries:
Eliminates the chain of commandHas limitless spans of controlUses empowered teams rather than departments
Eliminates external boundaries:Uses virtual, network, and modular organisational structures to get closer to stakeholders.
8
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 29
Removing boundaries
Virtual organisationAn organisation that consists of a small core of full-time employees and that temporarily hires specialists to work on opportunities that arise.
Network organisationA small core organisation that outsources its major business functions (e.g., manufacturing) in order to concentrate what it does best.
Modular organisationA manufacturing organisation that uses outside suppliers to provide product components for its final assembly operations.
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 30
Organisational designs (cont’d)
The learning organisationAn organisation that has developed the capacity to continuously learn, adapt, and change through the practice of knowledge management by employees.Characteristics of a learning organisation:
An open team-based organisation design that empowers employeesExtensive and open information sharingLeadership that provides a shared vision of the organisation’s future, support and encouragementA strong culture of shared values, trust, openness, and a sense of community.
Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, Coulter: Management 4e © 2006 Pearson Education Australia 31
Characteristics of a learning organisation
Figure 10.7