+ All Categories

L9-10

Date post: 05-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: muhammad-haris-hamayun
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 29

Transcript
  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    1/29

    Absorption in packed towers: Rich gases case

    Rich gas case: Vconst, Lconst

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    2/29

    Consider an absorption column;

    Consider a mass transfer process in a section ofthe column dZ (cross-section of the column is S)

    La,xa

    Va,ya

    Vb,yb Lb,xb

    Z

    dZ

    SdZyyaKy

    VdydN yA *)(1

    *

    S

    Absorption in packed towers: Rich gases case

    yxy k

    y

    k

    m

    K

    )1(1*

    i

    i

    y

    y

    yyy

    1

    1ln

    ]1[]1[1

    Rich gas case: Vconst, Lconst

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    3/29

    La,xa

    Va,ya

    Vb,yb Lb,xb

    Z

    S

    b

    a

    y

    y yaKyyy

    Vdy

    SZ

    **))(1(

    1

    Absorption in packed towers: Rich gases case

    Example:McCabe, Smith, Harriott: Chapter 18Seader Hanley: Chapter 6

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    4/29

    Absorption in packed towers: Rich gases case

    Prescriptive design process

    1) Establish equilibrium relation y*=mx

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    5/29

    Absorption in packed towers: Rich gases case

    Prescriptive design process

    1) Establish equilibrium relation y*=mx

    2) Operating line. In case of rich gases both V and L change andit is more convenient to work in terms of pure carrier

    gas V and pure solvent stream L

    )1(' xLL

    )1(' yVV

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    6/29

    Absorption in packed towers: Rich gases case

    Prescriptive design process

    1) Establish equilibrium relation y*=mx

    2) Operating line. In case of rich gases both V and L change andit is more convenient to work in terms of pure carrier

    gas V and pure solvent stream L

    plot y vs x

    y

    y

    y

    yV

    x

    x

    x

    xL

    b

    b

    b

    b

    11'

    11'

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    7/29

    Absorption in packed towers: Rich gases case

    y

    x

    (mole fraction of A in L)

    (mole fraction of A in V)

    xa xb

    y

    yb

    equilibrium line

    x*b

    3) For several values of y onthe operating line find:

    y*

    y1*y

    *1 y

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    8/29

    Absorption in packed towers: Rich gases case

    y

    x

    (mole fraction of A in L)

    (mole fraction of A in V)

    xa xb

    y

    yb

    equilibrium line

    x*b

    3) For several values of y onthe operating line find:

    y*

    akak

    xx

    yy

    y

    xi

    i

    i

    y i

    i

    y

    y

    yy

    y

    1

    1ln

    ]1[]1[

    1

    iy

    ak

    y

    ak

    m

    aK yxy

    )1(1

    *

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    9/29

    Absorption in packed towers: Rich gases case

    3) Continued:

    4) Find the term:

    )1(

    '

    y

    V

    V

    aKyyy

    V

    y

    **))(1(

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    10/29

    Absorption in packed towers: Rich gases case

    5) Integrate

    aKyyy yVSZ y**))(1(1

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    11/29

    Absorption in packed towers:

    Seader, Hanley

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    12/29

    P

    GVlog

    dry

    Loading point

    Flooding point

    Design considerations: Pressure drop and flooding

    G mass flow per unit area (GV-gas, GL-liquid)

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    13/29

    Liquid inlet

    Liquid outlet Gas inlet

    Gas outlet

    Some flooding description

    A visual build-up of liquid on the uppersurface of the packed bed

    A rapid increase in liquid hold-up withincreasing gas rate

    Formation of a continuous liquid phase abovethe packing support plate

    A considerable entrainment of liquid inthe outlet vapour

    Filling of the voids in the packed bed with liquid

    Design considerations: Pressure drop and flooding

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    14/29

    (McCabe, Smith, Harriott)

    Design considerations: Pressure drop and flooding

    GV

    GL

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    15/29

    Pressure drop analysis: Eckert graph

    )(

    1.02

    VLV

    p vFGVC

    Pressure drop in

    inH2O/ft of packing(brackets: mm H20/m of packing)

    Flooding line

    Design considerations: Diameter of packed towers

    L/V=GL/GV

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    16/29

    Design considerations: Diameter of packed towers

    Sinnott

    McCabe, SmithHarriott

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    17/29

    * Moderate to high pressure distillation =0.4 to 0.75 in water / ft packing= 32 to 63 mm water / m packing

    * Vacuum Distillation =0.1 to 0.2 in water / ft packing

    = 8 to 16 mm water / m packing

    * Absorbers and Strippers =0.2 to 0.6 in water / ft packing= 16 to 48 mm water / m packing

    Design considerations: Diameter of packed towers

    Given L, V (mass flow rates) Select pressure drop)(

    )( 1.02

    VLV

    p vFGVC

    select packingGV D

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    18/29

    Design considerations: Diameter of packed towers

    Given L, V (mass flow rates))(

    )( 1.02

    VLV

    p vFGVC

    GV=GV(flooding)/2 D

    at flooding velocity

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    19/29

    Example of using pressure drop correlations to estimategeometrical parameters of the packed column

    Specify the packing type and column dimensions for a column that will beused to remove chlorine from a gas stream using an organic solvent.The vapor flow is 7000 kg/h, the average vapor density is 4.2 kg/m3.

    The liquid flow is 5000 kg/h, the average liquid density is 833 kg/m3.The liquid's kinematic viscosity is 0.48 centistokes (4.8 x 10-7 m2/s)

    Design considerations: Diameter of packed towers

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    20/29

    First, we evaluate the x-axis of the graph above:(L/V)(vapor density/liquid density)0.5 = (5000/7000)(4.2/833)0.5 = 0.0507

    5.1

    )(

    1.02

    VLV

    p vFGVC

    * Moderate to high pressure distillation =0.4 to 0.75 in water / ft packing

    = 32 to 63 mm water / m packing

    * Vacuum Distillation =0.1 to 0.2 in water / ft packing= 8 to 16 mm water / m packing

    * Absorbers and Strippers =0.2 to 0.6 in water / ft packing= 16 to 48 mm water / m packing

    Design considerations: Diameter of packed towers

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    21/29

    5.1)(

    1.02

    VLV

    p vFGVC

    Fp packing factor,

    accounts for structure ofpacking and decreaseswith increasing void fraction

    Fp=24 for 2 inch Pallrings

    Design considerations: Diameter of packed towers

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    22/29

    Correlations for HTU

    LGOG HL

    mVHH

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    23/29

    Sinnott

    Correlations for HTU

    Cornell

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    24/29

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    25/29

    Sinnott

    Correlations for HTU

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    26/29

    Correlations for HTU

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    27/29

    Correlations for HTU

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    28/29

    Design of packed towers

    1) Calculate NTU

    distillation/absorption from dilute gas

    b

    a

    y

    yyy

    dy* y

    yy ab

    absorption from rich gas

    b

    a

    y

    yyyy

    dyy*))(1(

    )1(

    2) Select packing: defines size, packing factor Fp, specific surface area, voidfraction etc

  • 7/31/2019 L9-10

    29/29

    Design of packed towers

    3) Pressure drop, diameter of the column

    4) HTU from Cornell, or Onda methods

    5)

    D

    OGOGNHZ At this stage, height, diameter of the column andthe type of packing is known


Recommended