+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Lab I final presentation

Lab I final presentation

Date post: 15-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: kelsey-henderson
View: 256 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
25
FRICTIONAL HEAD LOSSES IN PIPES TALKING HEADS CLAUDE COLLIER KELSEY HENDERSON GARRET OZBOLT MICHAEL SCOTT-PIESCO 1
Transcript
Page 1: Lab I final presentation

FRICTIONAL HEAD LOSSES IN PIPES

TALKING HEADSCLAUDE COLLIER KELSEY HENDERSON GARRET OZBOLT MICHAEL SCOTT-PIESCO

1

Page 2: Lab I final presentation

PRESSURE DROP IN PIPES:INTRODUCTION• Necessity of Fluid Transport• Fluids move from high to low energy state• Incur energy losses• Pump Sizing• Piping Arrangement

2

Page 3: Lab I final presentation

PRESSURE DROP IN PIPES:INTRODUCTION• Energy Equation for Fluids:

3

Page 4: Lab I final presentation

FRICTION IN PIPES• “Skin Friction”

or ….

4

𝑃1

𝛾 +𝛼1

𝒗 122𝑔 +𝑧1+h𝑝=

𝑃2

𝛾 +𝛼2

𝒗222𝑔+𝑧2+h𝑇+h𝑓 +h𝑐

Page 5: Lab I final presentation

FANNING FRICTION FACTOR

5

• Definition: “The drag force per wetted surface unit area (shear stress at the surface) divided by the product of density times the velocity head.”

Head Loss: Operative:

Page 6: Lab I final presentation

FLOW REGIMES

6

• Reynold’s Number

Page 7: Lab I final presentation

PIPE ROUGHNESS

7

Page 8: Lab I final presentation

MOODY DIAGRAM

8

Page 9: Lab I final presentation

ORIFICE METERS

9

• Plate with bore

• Pressure taps on both sides

• Measures Flow

Page 10: Lab I final presentation

OBJECTIVES• Qualitatively determine relationship between friction

losses, Reynolds number, and relative roughness• Estimate orifice meter coefficient• Estimate absolute roughness of PVC pipe

10

Page 11: Lab I final presentation

SAFETY

11

Page 12: Lab I final presentation

EQUIPMENT

12

Page 13: Lab I final presentation

ROTAMETERS

13

• Height of float is directly proportional to fluid flow rate. This one measures in percent flow.

Page 14: Lab I final presentation

PROCEDURE• Produce rotameter calibration curve• Direct flow using valves on assembly• Connect DP cell to pressure taps on desired pipe or

component• Set flow to 100% flow on rotameter, and begin decreasing

until 0%, recording DP meter output along the way• Run procedure for 1" pipe, 3/4" pipe, and orifice meter

14

Page 15: Lab I final presentation

CALCULATING FANNING FRICTION FACTOR AND REYNOLDS NUMBER

15

Page 16: Lab I final presentation

COMPARISON OF REYNOLDS NUMBER AND FANNING FRICTION FACTOR

16

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 800000

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

0.01

0.012

1" Schedule 80 PVC pipe3/4" Schedule 80 PVC pipe

Reynolds number

Fann

ing

frict

ion

fact

or

Page 17: Lab I final presentation

COMPARISON OF REYNOLDS NUMBER AND FANNING FRICTION FACTOR OF DIFFERENT PRESSURE TAPS

17

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 700000

0.002

0.004

0.006

0.008

0.01

0.012

Taps 1&5Taps 1&4Taps 2&4Taps 2&5

Reynolds number

Fann

ing

frict

ion

fact

or

Page 18: Lab I final presentation

CALCULATE ABSOLUTE ROUGHNESS COEFFICIENT:SHACHAM EQUATION

18

ε = 0.0082Accepted value: 0.0015

Page 19: Lab I final presentation

FINDING ORIFICE METER COEFFICIENT:PLOT VOLUMETRIC FLOWRATE AGAINST SQUARE ROOT OF PRESSURE

19

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 7000

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

f(x) = 1.20717627462909 x − 26.3465218894154R² = 0.99972714439584

P1/2 (cm1/2 H2O)

Volu

met

ric F

low

Rat

e (c

m3/

s)

Page 20: Lab I final presentation

FINDING ORIFICE METER COEFFICIENT:USE SLOPE OF GRAPH TO SOLVE FOR COEFFICIENT

20

Co = 0.754Accepted value: 0.6-0.65

Page 21: Lab I final presentation

IN CONCLUSIONFanning friction factor and Reynolds Number

Showed the expected trends quantitativelyError at lower flow rates due to differential pressure readings

9/23/15

Convective Heat Transfer Experiment 21

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 50000 55000 600000

0.001

0.002

0.003

0.004

0.005

0.006

0.007

Taps 1&5Taps 1&4Taps 2&4Taps 2&5

Reynolds number

Fann

ing

frict

ion

fact

or

Page 22: Lab I final presentation

IN CONCLUSIONRelative roughness of pipe

Produced result 10X larger than expected, 0.014mm as opposed to accepted value of 0.0015mm, error most likely from differential pressure meter readings being off

22

Page 23: Lab I final presentation

IN CONCLUSIONOrifice meter coefficient

Value of 0.75 is slightly high, however reasonable given the accepted value is 0.6-0.65

23

Page 24: Lab I final presentation

RECOMMENDATIONS

24

Page 25: Lab I final presentation

QUESTIONS?Thank you for your attention

25


Recommended