Date post: | 15-Oct-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | orionsruler |
View: | 547 times |
Download: | 4 times |
of 32
1
LABOR STANDARDS
LAW 200M
Third Term, 2013-2014
Atty. Domingo T. Aonuevo
DLSU College of Law
+639178129948
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This course is about the fundamental principles of labor law, and the law
on recruitment and placement, labor standards, and termination of
employment.
LEARNING OUTCOMES (LO):
On completion of the course, the student is expected to be able to do
the following:
1. State the legal bases of labor law and tell where it may be found;
recognize the basic rights of workers and employers;
2. Tell when an employer-employee relationship exists; differentiate job
contracting from labor-only contracting;
3. Distinguish labor disputes from other disputes;
4. Tell when there is illegal recruitment; discuss the rights of apprentices,
learners and the disabled;
5. Restate and apply the minimum standards on hours of work, rest days,
holidays, various leaves, minimum wages, payment and protection of
wages, 13th month pay, and the working conditions for women, minors,
house helps and other special groups of workers;
6. Discuss the right to security of tenure; explain when an employee may quit
his/her employment; identify the just and business-related causes for
termination of employment; describe the procedural requirements of
termination of employment; and identify the reliefs and remedies in cases
of illegal dismissals;
2
7.7.7.7. Discuss the coverage of and the benefits under the various social
legislations.
8.8.8.8. Teach workers the basic labor standards.
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS:
The student will be assessed during the term by the following:
Class participation 30.00%
Attendance/recitation 15.00%
Reports 15.00%
Quizzes 20.00%
Workers seminar 20.00%
Final examination 30.00%
Students should submit to DTA class cards with 1x1 photos and email
address not later than the 2nd class day.
Laptops and tablets may be used to take down notes but should be
turned off/closed when owner is called to recite. All notes and books
should be closed also during recitation.
Consultation is by appointment or through email.
No excuse will be accepted for failing to take a quiz or submitting a report
or paper.
Every student must present a report to the class on any of the topics
identified in the course outline.
Every gang of 2 students should be able to conduct a 2-hour seminar-
presentation to a group of employees on any of the above topics on or
before the last week of classes.
LEARNING PLAN:
LEARNING
OUTCOME:
Student should be
TOPIC DAYS
LEARNING
ACTIVITIES
3
able to
State the legal bases
of labor law and tell
where it may be
found; recognize the
basic rights of workers
and employers;
Part I:
Introduction
to Labor Law
Sections 1 - 4.
2.5 * Lecture
* Recitation
* Lecture
* Recitation
* Report on the Tonko cases
Tell when an
employer- employee
relationship exists;
differentiate job
contracting from
labor-only
contracting;
distinguish labor
disputes from other
disputes;
Part I:
Introduction
to Labor Law
Sections 5 & 6
2
Quiz on Part I
* Lecture
* Recitation
* Report on training and
employment of disabled
persons (handicapped workers)
Tell when there is
illegal recruitment;
Discuss when an alien
may be employed;
discuss the rights of
apprentices, learners
and the disabled;
Part II:
Recruitment
& Placement
of Workers/
Alien
Employment
Part III:
Human
Resources
Development
2
Quiz on Parts II & III
* Lecture
* Recitation
* Report on the Kasambahay
law
Restate and apply
the minimum
standards on hours of
work, rest days,
holidays, various
leaves, minimum
wages, payment and
protection of wages,
13th month pay, and
the working
conditions for
women, minors,
house helps and
other special groups
of workers;
Part IV: Labor
Standards 3
Quiz on Part IV
4
* Lecture
* Recitation
* Report on FASAP v. PAL, G.R.
No. 178083
Discuss the right to
security of tenure;
explain when an
employee may
terminate his/her
employment; identify
the just and business-
related causes for
termination of
employment;
describe the
procedural
requirements of
termination of
employment; and
identify the reliefs and
remedies in cases of
illegal dismissals;
Part V:
Termination
of
Employment
3
Quiz on Part V
REFERENCES:
SALVADOR A. POQUIZ, LABOR STANDARDS LAW WITH NOTES AND
COMMENTS, 2012 EDITION;
C.A. AZUCENA, JR., THE LABOR CODE WITH COMMENTS AND CASES, VOL. I,
2010 EDITION;
Nota bene:
Most of the case titles below are hyperlinked to websites containing
the cases' full texts.
5
Part I:
INTRODUCTION TO LABOR LAW
1 Labor law, defined
2 Labor law, classified
3 Legal bases of labor law
3.1 Police power of the State Philippine Association of Service
Exporters, Inc. v. Drilon, 163 SCRA 386
(1988); St. Lukes Medical Center
Employees Association-AFW v. NLRC, 517
SCRA 677 (2007); Magana v. Medicard
Phil., Inc., 638 SCRA 606 (2010)
3.2 Specific provisions of the 1987
Constitution
3.2.1 Social Justice
1987 Constitution, Art. II, Secs. 5 & 10; Art. XIII,
Secs. 1 & 2;
3.2.1.1 Defined Calalang v. Williams, 70 Phil. 726 (1940); Fr.
Joaquin Bernas, The 1987 Philippine
Constitution: A Reviewer-Primer, 1987 ed., p.
23.
3.2.1.1 Applied HFS Phil., Inc. v. Pilar, G.R. No. 168716, April
16, 2009; PLDT v. NLRC, 164 SCRA (1988);
Toyota Motor Phil. Corp. Workers
Association v. NLRC, G.R. No. 158786,
October 19, 2007; Paloma v. PAL, G.R. No.
163607, July 14, 2008;
3.2.1.3 Protection of
labor
CONST., Art. II, Sec. 18; Art XIII, Sec. 3.;
Cebu Royal Plant v. Hon Deputy Minister
of Labor, 153 SCRA 38 (1987); Gregorio
Araneta University Foundation v. NLRC,
155 SCRA 301(1987); Quitoriano v. Jebsens
Maritime, Inc., G.R. No. 179868, January 21,
2010.
3.2.1.3 Right to due
process and right to
labor as property
CONST., Art. IIL, Sec. 1;
Callanta v. Carnation Philippines, Inc.,
145 SCRA 268 (1986); Phil. Movie Pictures
Workers' Asso. v. Premiere Productions,
Inc., 92 Phil. 843 (1953).
6
3.2.3 Gender equality and
protection of women
CONST., Art. II, Sec. 14; Art. XIII, Sec. 14
Suggested reading: Emily Salcedo,
Romantic Paternalism in Philippine Labor
Law Revisiting the Tradition, Realizing its
Folly, and Proposing Reconstruction in the
Light of American Experience, DLSU Business
& Economics Review, 21.1 (2011), pp. 77-96.
3.2.4 Right of government
employees to organize
CONST., Art. IX-B, Sec. 2(5); Art. III, Sec. 8
3.2.5 Protection to rights of
employer
CONST., Art. II, Sec. 20 and Art. XIII, Sec. 3,
par. 4;
3.2.6.1 Definition &
Scope of
Management
Prerogatives (MP)
Chu v. NLRC, 232 SCRA 764 (1994); San
Miguel Brewery Sales Force Union
(PTGWO) v. Ople, 170 SCRA 25 (1989);
Philippine Airlines, Inc. v. NLRC, 225 SCRA
301 (1993); Royal Plant Workers Union v.
Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc.
Cebu Plant, G.R. No. 198783; April 15,
2013
3.2.6.2 Limits of MP SHS Perforated Materials, Inc. v. Diaz, 633
SCRA 258 (2010); Supreme Steel Corp. v.
Nagkakaisang Manggagawa Ng
Supreme Independent Union (Nms-Ind-
Apl), G.R. No. 185556, March 28, 2011; PLDT
v. Paguio, G.R. No. 152689, October 12,
2005; Businessday Information Systems and
Services, Inc. v. NLRC, 221 SCRA 9 (1993)
3.3 Civil Code CIVIL CODE, Arts. 1700 & 1701;
Brew Master International v. National
Federation of Labor Unions, 271 SCRA 275
(1997); PNCC Skyway Traffic
Management and Security Division
Workers Organization (PSTMSDWO) v.
PNCC Skyway Corp., 613 SCRA 28 (2010)
4 Sources of labor law
7
4.1 The Labor Code and its
implementing rules
4.1.1 Brief history Poquiz, pp. 3-4, 37-38; Azucena, pp. 15-17
4.1.2 Name of Decree LABOR CODE, Art. 1
4.1.3 Date of Effectivity Id., Art. 2
4.1.4 Declaration of Basic
Policy
Id., Art. 3; CONST. (1973), Art. II, Sec. 9;
CONST., Art. XIII, Sec. 3
4.1.5 Construction in favor of
Labor
LABOR CODE, Art. 4; CIVIL CODE, Art. 1702
Reyes v. CA, 409 SCRA 267 (2003); J.K.
Mercado & Sons Agricultural Enterprises,
Inc. v. Hon. Patricia Sto. Tomas, G.R. No.
158084, August 29, 2008; PNCC Skyway
Traffic Management and Security
Division Workers Organization
(PSTMSDWO) v. PNCC Skyway Corp., 613
SCRA 28 (2010)
4.1.6 Rule-making power,
limitations
LABOR CODE, Art. 5;
Insular Bank of Asia and America
Employees' Union v. inciong, G.R. No. L-
52415, October 23, 1984
4.1.7 Applicability LABOR CODE, Art. 6
4.1.7.1 Overseas
Workers
Sim v. NLRC, G.R. No. 157376, October 2,
2007; Santiago v. CF Sharp Crew
Management, G.R. No. 162419, July 10,
2007
4.1.7.2
Government
employees
CONST., Art. IX-B, Sec. 2(1); LABOR CODE,
Art. 276;
NASECO v. NLRC, G.R. No. L-70295,
November 29, 1988; PNOC-Energy
Development Corp. v. NLRC, 201 SCRA
487 (1991)
Liban v. Gordon, G.R. No. 175352, January
8
18, 2011, July 15, 2009
4.1.7.3 Employees of
International
Organizations and
Specialized Agencies
International Catholic Migration
Commission v. Calleja, 190 SCRA 130
(1990)
4.1.8 Enforcement and
Sanctions
LABOR CODE, Art. 128; D.O. No. 131-13 &
D.O. No. 57-04;
LABOR CODE, Arts.129 & 223 (a) (2), (3), (4),
& (6), 294, 295, 296, 297, & 298; CONST., Art.
III, Secs. 11 & 16
4.2 Decisions of the courts and
quasi-judicial bodies
Callanta v. Carnation Phil., Inc., 145 SCRA
268 (1986)
4.3 Labor Contracts CIVIL CODE, Arts. 1305 & 1306;
Supreme Steel Corp. v. Nagkakaisang
Manggagawa Ng Supreme
Independent Union (Nms-Ind-Apl), G.R.
No. 185556, March 28, 2011; Mariveles
Shipyard Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 144134,
November 11, 2003
4.4 Company Practice
Central Azucarera De Tarlac v. Central
Azucarera De Tarlac Labor Union-NLU,
G.R. No. 188949, July 26, 2010; Metropolitan
Bank and Trust Co. v. NLRC, G.R. No.
152928, June 18,2009; Pag-asa Steel Works,
Inc. v. CA, 486 SCRA 475 (2006)
4.5 Company Policy Kimberly-Clark Phil., Inc. v. Dimayuga,
G.R. No. 177705, September 18, 2009; China
Banking Corp. v. Borromeo, G.R. No.
148415, July 14, 2008; GTE Directories Corp.
v. Sanchez, 197 SCRA 452, 466 (1991)
5 Work Relationship
5.1 Definition: Employer &
Employee
LABOR CODE, Arts. 97 (a), (b), (c); 167 (f), (g)
& (h); 212 (e) & (f)
A.C. Ransom Labor Union v. NLRC, 142
9
SCRA 269 (1988); Orlando Farms Growers
Association v. NLRC, 299 SCRA 364,
November 25, 1998; Far Eastern University
v. CIR, 5 SCRA 1080 (1962)
5.2 Employer-Employee
Relationship: Factors/Tests
Sonza v. ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp.,
431 SCRA 381(1904); Semblante v. CA, G.R.
No. 196426, August 15, 2011; Sy v. CA, G.R.
No. 142293, Feb. 27, 2003; Perpetual Help
Credit v. Faburada, G.R. No. 121948,
October 8, 2001; Jardin v. NLRC, 326 SCRA
299 (2000); Corporal Sr. v. NLRC, 341 SCRA
658 (2000);; Ruga v. NLRC, 181 SCRA 266
(1990); Mendiola v. CA, G.R. No. 159333,
July 31, 2006; Tongko v. The
Manufacturers Life Insurance Co. (Phils.)
Inc., G.R. No. 167622, November 7, 2008,
June 29, 2010, & January 25, 2011; Locsin v.
PLDT, G.R. 185251, October 2, 2009;
Francisco v. NLRC, G.R. No. 170087, August
31, 2006; Teng v. Pahagac, 635 SCRA
172(2010)
5.3 Independent Contractor and
Labor-only Contractor
LABOR CODE, Arts. 106, 107, 108 &109; D.O.
No. 18-A (2011)
Phil. Bank Communications v. NLRC, 146
SCRA 347 (1986); San Miguel Corp. v.
Maerc Integrated Services, Inc.; G.R. No.
144672, July 10, 2003; Wack Wack Golf and
Country Club v. NLRC, 456 SCRA 280
(2005); Aliviado v. Proctor and Gamble
Phils., Inc., G.R. No. 160506, March 9, 2010;
Spic n Span Services Corp. v. Gloria
Paje, et al., G.R. No. 174084, August 25,
2010;
5.4 Liability of Indirect Employer GSIS v. NLRC, 635 SCRA 251 (2010);
Mariveles Shipyard Corp. v. CA, 415 SCRA
573 (2003)
6 Labor disputes Labor Code (LC), Art. 218 (l);
Feati University v. Bautista, 18 SCRA 1190
(1966); San Miguel Corp. Employees
Union v. Bersamira, G.R. No. 87700, June
13, 1990; Halaguea v. PAL, G.R. No.
10
172013, October 2, 2009; Nestle Phils., Inc.
v. NLRC, G.R. No. 85197, March 18, 1991;
Jaguar Security and Investigation
Agency v. Sales, G.R. No. 162420, April 16,
2008;
Part II:
RECRUITMENT AND PLACEMENT OF WORKERS/ALIEN EMPLOYMENT
7 Recruitment and Placement of Workers Suggested reading:
Julyn S. Ambito and Melissa Suzette L.
Banzon, Review of Philippine Migration
Laws and Regulations: Gains, Gaps,
Prospects.
7.1 Definition LABOR CODE, Art. 13(b);
People v. Panis, 142 SCRA 667 [1986)
7.2 Employment Policies
7.3 Employment Agencies/Entities
7.3.1 Allowed entities LABOR CODE, Arts. 16, 18, 25 & 12(f);
Omnibus Rules, Book I, Rules III, IV, VII Sec
1.
7.3.2 Private employment
agency
LABOR CODE, Art. 13(c) & (d)
7.3.3 Private recruitment
entity
LABOR CODE, Art. 13(e) & (f)
7.3.4 Public employment
offices
LABOR CODE, Art. 12(f) & 14(a); E.O. No.
247 (1987), Sec. 3 (f),
7.3.5 Prohibited entity LABOR CODE, Arts. 18, 16, 25 & 26; 2002
POEA Rules and Regulations Governing the
Recruitment and Employment of Land-
based Overseas Workers (2002 POEA
Rules), Part II, Rule 1, Sec. 2; 2003 POEA
Rules,and Regulations Governing the
Recruitment and Employment of Seafarers
(2003 POEA Rules), Part II, Rule I, Sec. 2
7.4 Government techniques of
regulation - private recruitment
11
7.4.1 Licensing LABOR CODE, Arts. 27, 28, 29, 30 & 31;
2002 POEA Rules, Part II, Rule II, Secs. 1, 4, 6
& 7; 2003 POEA Rules, and Regulations
Governing the Recruitment and
Employment of Seafarers (2003 POEA
Rules), Part II, Rule I (a) & (b); Rule II, Secs.
1, 4, 6 & 7
7.4.2 Workers Fee LABOR CODE, Art. 32
7.4.3 Reports/employment
information
LABOR CODE, Art. 33
7.5 Prohibited practices LABOR CODE, Art. 34
7.6 Illegal recruitment LABOR CODE, Art. 38(a) & (b); R.A. No.
8042, as amended, Sec. 6;
Boneng v. People; G.R. No. 133563,
March 4, 1999; People v. Gallo, G.R. No.
185277, March 18, 2010; People v. Hu,
G.R. No. 182232, October 6, 2008; People
v. Chua, G.R. No. 184058; March 10, 2010;
People v. Laogo, G.R. No. 176264,
January 10, 2011; Salazar v. Achacoso,
183 SCRA 145 (1990)
7.7 Enforcement & sanctions LABOR CODE, Arts. 35, 36, 37, 38 & 39; R.A.
No. 8042, Secs. 6, 7, & 10;
Serrano v. Gallant Maritime Services,
Inc., G.R. No. 16714, March 24, 2009;
Eastern Assurance and Surety Corp. v.
Sec. of Labor, 181 SCRA 110 (1990); Sto.
Tomas v. Salac, G.R. No. 152642, December 5, 2012;
7.7.1 Joint and several
liability of private
employment agency/
manning agent and
employer
R.A. No. 8042, as amended, Sec. 10, pars.
2 & 3; 2002 POEA Rules, Part II, Rule II,
Sec. 1(f)(3); 2003 POEA Rules, Part II, Rule
II, Sec. 1(e)(8);
Datuman v. First Cosmopolitan
Manpower and Promotion Services,
Inc., G.R. No. 156029, November 14, 2008
12
7.8 Jurisdiction
7.8.1 Regional Trial Court, for
criminal action for illegal
recruitment
R.A. No. 8042, Sec. 9
7.8.2 NLRC, for money claims
arising from employer-
employee relations
R.A. No. 8042, Sec. 10;
Serrano v. Gallant Maritime Services,
Inc., G.R. No. 16714, March 24, 2009.
7.8.3 POEA, for administrative
and disciplinary actions
Omnibus Rules Implementing R.A. No.
8042, Sec. 28
8 Alien employment regulation CONST., Art. XII, Sec. 12; Anti-Dummy Law
(Com. Act No. 108), Sec. 2-A, as
amended, in rel. to CONST., Art. XVI, Sec.
11(1), Art. XVI, Sec. 11(2), Art. XII, Sec. 11;
INVESTMENT CODE, Art. 76, par. 2; LABOR
CODE, Arts. 40, 41 & 42; Omnibus Rules,
Book I, Rule XIV; D.O. No. 97-09 (Revised
Rules for Issuance of Employment Permits
to Foreign Nationals)
8.1 Coverage D.O. 97-09 , Secs. 1 & 2;
Almodiel v. NLRC, 223 SCRA 341 (1993)
8.2 Conditions for grant of permit LABOR CODE, Art. 40; D.O. 97-09 , Sec. 10;
WPP Marketing Communications, Inc.
v. Galera, 616 SCRA 422 (2010); General
Milling Corp. v. Torres, 196 SCRA 215
(1991)
Part III
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
9 Development of human resources LABOR CODE, Arts. 57-81; Technical
Education and Skills Development Act
(TESDA) of 1994 (R.A. No. 7796); Dual Training
Systems Act of 1994 (R.A. No. 7686); Magna
Carta for Disabled Persons of 1992 (R.A. No.
7277)
9.1 Policy, goals & objectives R.A. No. 7796, Secs. 2 & 3
10 Training and employment of
apprentices
13
10.1 Apprentices, defined LABOR CODE, Art. 58 ; R.A. No. 7796, Sec. 4
(j), (k), (l), & (m). See also: Child Abuse Law
of 1992 (R.A. No. 7610), as amended by R.A.
No. 7658, re: employment of children below
15 years
10.2 When apprentices may be
employed
Century Canning Corp. v. CA, 530 SCRA
501(2007); Nitto Enterprises v. NLRC, 248
SCRA 654 (1995); Atlanta Industries v.
Sebolino, G.R. Mo. 187320, January 26, 2011
10.3 Conditions of employment LABOR CODE, Arts. 61, 72 &124, last par.
10.4 Enforcement LABOR CODE, Arts. 65, 66, & 67
11 Training and employment of learners
11.1 Learners, defined LABOR CODE, Art. 73; R.A. No. 7796, Sec.
4(n)
11.2 When learners may be
employed
LABOR CODE, Art. 74; R.A. No. 7796, Sec.
4(n)
11.3 Conditions of employment LABOR CODE, Arts. 75, 76 & 124, last par.
12 Training and employment of disabled
persons (handicapped workers) LABOR CODE, Arts. 78, 79, 80, & 81; Magna
Carta for Disabled Persons of 1992 (R.A. No.
7277)
12.1 Definition R.A. No. 7277, Sec. 4(a), (b), (c), & (d)
12.2 Policy declaration R.A. No. 7277, Sec. 2
12.3 Coverage R.A. No. 7277, Sec. 3
12.4 Rights and privileges R.A. No. 7277, Secs. 5, & 6
Bernardo v. NLRC, 310 SCRA 186 (1999)
Part IV
LABOR STANDARDS
13 HOURS OF WORK LABOR CODE, Arts. 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87,
88, 89 & 90; Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rules I,
IA, & II
13.1 Regulation; rationale Manila Terminal Co. Inc., v. CIR, 91 Phil.
625, 636 (1952)
14
13.2 Coverage: all employees, in
general
LABOR CODE, Arts. 82 & 276; Omnibus
Rules, Book III, Rule I, Secs. 1 & 2
13.3 Exemptions
13.3.1 Government
employees
CONST., Art. IX-B, Sec. 2(1)
13.3.2 Managerial
employees
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 2(b) &
(c);
San Miguel Corp. v. Layoc, Jr., 537 SCRA
77 (2007)
13.3.2.1 Rationale NAWASA v. NAWASA Consolidated
Unions, 11 SCRA 766, 776 to 779 (1964)
13.3.2.2 Supervisors
are managerial
employees
National Sugar Refineries Corp. v. NLRC,
G.R. No. 101761, March 24, 1993.
13.3.3 Field personnel Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 2 (f);
Far East Agricultural Supply, Inc. v.
Lebatique, 515 SCRA 491(2007); Mercidar
Fishing Corp. v. NLRC, 297 SCRA 440
(1998); Union of Filipro Employees v.
Vivar, 205 SCRA 200 (1992)
13.3.4 Dependent family
members
13.3.5 Domestic helpers LABOR CODE, Arts. 141 &145; Omnibus
Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 2 (d)
13.3.6 Persons in the
personal service of another
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 2 (d)
13.3.7 Piece workers Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule VII, Sec. 8 (e);
Labor Congress of the Philippines v.
NLRC, 290 SCRA 509 (1998)
13.4 Normal hours of work LABOR CODE, Art. 83
13.4.1 Change in work hours
15
13.4.1.1 A
management
prerogative
Union Carbide Labor Union v. Union
Carbide Phils., Inc., 215 SCRA 554 (1992)
13.4.1.2 Compressed
work week
Department Order (D.O.) No. 21, Series of
1990, Guidelines on the Implementation of
Compressed Workweek; Department
Advisory No. 02-04; Department Advisory
No. 02-09:
Bisig Manggagawa sa Tryco v. NLRC,
G.R. No 1513098, October 15, 2008
13.5 Compensable hours of work -
in general
13.5.1 On duty LABOR CODE, Art. 84(a); Omnibus Rules,
Book III, Rule I, Sec. 3 (a) & Sec. 4 (a)
13.5.2 At work LABOR CODE, Art. 84 (b); Omnibus Rules,
Book III, Rule I, Sec. 3 (b)
13.6 Specific rules
13.6.1 Rest period
13.6.1.1 Short duration
or coffee break
LABOR CODE, Art. 84, 2nd par.; Omnibus
Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 7, 2nd par.
13.6.1.2 More than 20
minutes
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 4 (b)
13.6.2 Meal period
13.6.2.1 Regular meal
period (one hour)
LABOR CODE, Art. 85; Omnibus Rules, Book
III, Rule I, Sec. 7, 1st par.;
Philippine Airlines v. NLRC, 302 SCRA 582
(1999)
13.6.2.2 Shorter meal
period (less than one
hour but not less than
20 min.)
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 7, 1st
par.
13.6.3 Waiting time Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 5 (a);
Arica v. NLRC, 170 SCRA 776 (89)
16
13.6.4 On call Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 5 (b)
13.6.5 Inactive due to work
interruptions
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 4 (d);
University of Pangasinan Faculty Union
v. University of Pangasinan, G.R. No. L-
63122, February 20, 1984
13.6.6 Work after normal
hours
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 4 (c)
13.6.7 Lectures, meeting,
trainings
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 6
13.6.8 Travel time Rada v. NLRC, 205 SCRA 69 (1992)
13.6.9 "No Work, No Pay"
principle
University of Pangasinan Faculty Union
v. NLRC, 127 SCRA 691 (1984); Prieto v.
NLRC, 226 SCRA 232 (1993)
13.7 Overtime work/pay LABOR CODE, Arts. 87, 88, 89 & 90;
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Secs. 8, 9, &
10
13.7.1 In general LABOR CODE, Art. 87
13.7.1.1 Rationale for
overtime pay
PNB v. Phil. National Bank Employees
Association, 115 SCRA 507 (1982)
13.7.1.2 Overtime
work: voluntary/
consensual
LABOR CODE, Art. 87
Interphil Laboratories Employees' Union-
FFW v. Interphil Laboratories, Inc., G.R.
No. 142824, December 19, 2001.
13.7.1.3 Overtime
instruction, not
required
William Lines, Inc. v. Lopez, 96 SCRA 593
(1980)
13.7.1.4 But evidence
of performance of
overtime work
required
Cagampan v. NLRC, G.R. No. 85122-24,
March 22, 1991
13.7.1.5 No offsetting
of overtime with
under time
LABOR CODE, Art. 88
17
13.7.2 Emergency or
compulsory overtime work
LABOR CODE, Art. 89;
13.7.3 Computation LABOR CODE, Art. 90
13.8Night work LABOR CODE, Art. 86; Omnibus Rules, Book
III, Rule II, Secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6
14 WEEKLY REST PERIODS LABOR CODE, Arts. 91, 92 & 93; Omnibus
Rules, Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule III, Secs.
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9
14.1 Coverage LABOR CODE, Arts. 82 & 91
14.2 Determination, compulsory
work; compensation
LABOR CODE, Arts. 91, 92 & 93;
15 HOLIDAYS LABOR CODE, Art. 94; R.A. No. 9849;
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule IV
15.1 Coverage LABOR CODE, Art. 94 (a);
Mantrade/ FMMC Division Employees
and Workers Union v. Bacungan, 144
SCRA 510 (1986)
15.1.1 Exception: retail
establishment
LABOR CODE, Art. 94 (a); Rules
Implementing R.A. No. 6727, par. f
15.1.2 Exception: service
establishment
LABOR CODE, Art. 94 (a); Rules
Implementing R.A. No. 6727, par. g
15.2 Holiday pay LABOR CODE, Art. 94(c);
Asian Transmission Corp. v. CA, G.R. No.
144664, May 15, 2004
15.2.1 Faculty in private
school
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule IV, Sec. 8 (a);
Jose Rizal College v. NLRC, 156 SCRA 27
(1987)
15.2.2 Divisor as factor Trans-Asia Phil. Employees Association v.
NLRC, 320 SCRA 347 (1999);
15.2.3 Sunday Wellington Investment Inc. v. Trajano,
245 SCRA 561 (1995)
15.2.4 Muslim holiday SMC v. CA, 375 SCRA 311 (2002)
18
16 SERVICE INCENTIVE LEAVE, PATERNITY
LEAVE AND PARENTAL LEAVE Art. 95; Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule V;
Paternity Leave Act of 1996 (RA 8187); Solo
Parents Welfare Act of 2000 (RA 8972)
16.1 Service incentive leave
coverage
LABOR CODE, Art. 95 (a) (b); Omnibus
Rules, Book III, Rule V;
Makati Haberdashery Inc. v. NLRC, 179
SCRA 449 (1989); Labor Congress v.
NLRC, 290 SCRA 509 (1998); Serrano v.
Severino Santos Transit, 627 SCRA
483(2010)
16.2 Paternity leave Paternity Leave Act of 1996 (R.A. No.
8187), Secs. 1-6; Impl. Guidelines
16.3 Parental leave Solo Parents Welfare Act of 2000 (R.A. No.
8972)
17 SERVICE CHARGES LABOR CODE, Art. 96; Omnibus Rules, Book
III, Rule VI
17.1 Covered employees/sharing LABOR CODE, Art. 96
18 MINIMUM WAGES AND WAGE FIXING
MACHINERY
18.1 Minimum wages LABOR CODE, Art. 99; CONST., Art. XIII, Sec.
3
18.1.1 Rule
18.1.1.1 No work, no
pay/ a fair days
wage for a fair days
labor
Aklan Electric Corp., Inc. v. NLRC, 323
SCRA 258 (2000); Social Security System v.
SSS Supervisors' Union, 117 SCRA
746(1982)
18.1.1.2 Equal pay for
work of equal value
LABOR CODE, Art. 135;
International School Alliance of
Educators v. Quisumbing, G.R. No.
128845, June 1, 2000
18.1.1.3 Form:
agreement for
compensation of
services
Arms Taxi v. NLRC, 219 SCRA 306 (1993)
18.1.2 Coverage LABOR CODE, Arts. 97 (b), (c ) & (e) & 98;
19
Phil. Fisheries Development Authority v.
NLRC,213 SCRA 621 (1992)
18.1.3 Minimum wage LABOR CODE, Arts. 99, 97(f), 61, 75(c), &
80(b);
R.A. No. 9547, Sec. 2
18.1.4 Determination of
compliance with minimum
wage
Iran v. NLRC, 289 SCRA 433 (1998)
18.1.5 Facilities and
supplements/allowances
Millares v. NLRC, 305 SCRA 500 (1999); SLL
International Cables Specialist v. NLRC,
644 SCRA 411 (2011)
18.1.6 Cash
wage/commission
Songco v. NLRC, 183 SCRA 610 (1990);
Boie Takeda v. De la Serna, 228 SCRA
329 (1993); Phil. Duplicators v. NLRC, 241
SCRA 380 (1995)
18.1.7 Gratuity and
salary/wages, difference
Plastic Town Center Corp. v. NLRC, 172
SCRA 580 (1989)
18.1.8 Effect on benefits - LABOR CODE, Art. 100;
Davao Fruits Corp. v. ALU, 225 SCRA 562
(1993)
18.2 Wage-fixing machinery Wage Rationalization Act (R.A. No. 6727)
which amended Art. 120-127 & Omnibus
Rules, Book III, Rule IX
18.2.1 Rationale for wage
rationalization
RA 6727, Sec. 2
18.2.2 Agencies in wage
fixing machinery
18.2.2.1 National
Wages and
Productivity
Commission
RA 6727, Sec. 3; LABOR CODE, Arts. 120,
121 & 126
18.2.2.2 Regional
Tripartite Wages and
RA 6727, Sec. 3; LABOR CODE, Arts. 122,
126
20
Productivity Board Nasipit Lumber Co. v. NWPC, 289 SCRA
667 (98)
18.2.3 Standards/criteria for
minimum wage fixing
RA 6727, Sec. 3; LABOR CODE, Art. 124
18.2.4 Wage order LABOR CODE, Arts. 123 & 124
18.2.4.1 Methods of
fixing
18.2.4.1.1 Floor
wage method
18.2.4.1.2
Salary - ceiling
method
Employers Confederation of the
Philippines v. NWPC, 201 SCRA 759 (1991)
18.2.4.2 Validity Cagayan Sugar Milling Co. v. Secretary,
284 SCRA 150 (1998); Metropolitan Bank
and Trust Company, Inc. v. NWPC, 514
SCRA 346(2007)
18.2.4.3 Wage
distortion
LABOR CODE, Art. 124;
Prubankers Association v. Prudential
Bank & Trust Co., 302 SCRA 74 (1999); P.I.
Manufacturing, Inc., v. P.I.
Manufacturing Supervisors and
Foremen Association, 543 SCRA 613
(2008)
18.3 WAGE PAYMENT AND
PROTECTION
LABOR CODE, Arts. 102, 103, 104, &105;
Civil Code, Art. 1705
18.3.1 Form of payment LABOR CODE, Art. 102; Civil Code, Art.
1705;
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule VIII, Secs. 1 &
2;
Congson v. NLRC, 243 SCRA 260 (1995)
18.3.2 Time of payment LABOR CODE, Art. 103; Sec. 3
18.3.3 Place of payment LABOR CODE, Art. 104; Sec. 4
18.3.4 Direct payment of LABOR CODE, Art. 105; Omnibus Rules,
21
wages Book III, Rule VIII, Secs. 5 & 6;
Bermiso v. Escano Inc., 105 Phil. 231
(1959)
18.4 WAGE PROHIBITIONS
18.4.1 Prohibition against
interference in disposal of
wages
LABOR CODE, Art. 112; Omnibus Rules,
Book III, Rule VIII, Sec. 12
18.4.2 Prohibition against
wage deduction
LABOR CODE, Art. 113; Omnibus Rules,
Book III, Rule VIII, Sec. 13;
Apodaca v. NLRC, 172 SCRA 442 (1989)
18.4.3 Prohibition against
requirement to make
deposits for loss or damage
LABOR CODE, Art. 114 & 115; Omnibus
Rules, Book III, Rule VIII, Sec. 14;
Dentech Manufacturing Corp. v. NLRC,
172 SCRA 588 (1989); Five J Taxi v. NLRC,
235 SCRA 556 (1994)
18.4.4 Prohibition against
withholding of wages
LABOR CODE, Art.116; Civil Code, Art. 1706
18.4.5 Prohibition against
deduction to ensure
employment
LABOR CODE, Art. 117
18.4.6 Prohibition against
retaliatory measures
LABOR CODE, Art. 118
18.4.7 Prohibition against
false reporting
LABOR CODE, Art. 119; Omnibus Rules,
Book III, Rule X, Sec. 13
18.4.8 Prohibition
against keeping of
employees records
in a place other than
the workplace
Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule X, Sec. 11;
South Motorists Enterprises v. Tosoc, 181
SCRA 386 (1990)
18.4.9 Prohibition
against garnishment/
execution
Civil Code, Art. 1708;
Gaa v. CA, 140 SCRA 304 (1985)
18.5 WORKERS PREFERENCE IN THE LABOR CODE, Art. 110; Civil Code, 1707,
2241, 2242, 2244;
22
EVENT OF BANKRUPTCY DBP v. Secretary of Labor, G.R. 79351,
November 28, 1989; Barayoga v. Asset
Privatization Trust, 473 SCRA 690 (2005)
18.6 WAGE RECOVERY/
JURISDICTION
LABOR CODE, Arts. 128, 129, 217, & 111;
Balladares v. Paek Ventures Corp., G.R.
No. 161794, June 16, 2009; Meteoro v.
Creative Creatures, Inc., G.R. No. 171275,
July 13, 2009.
19 Thirteenth month pay Pres. Decree No. 851
19.1 History of the law Dentech Manufacturing Corp. v. NLRC,
172 SCRA 588 (1989)
19.2 Coverage Revised Guidelines on the Implementation
of 13th Month Pay Law (Revised
Guidelines);
Archilles Manufacturing Corp. v. NLRC,
244 SCRA 750 (1995)
19.3 Rationale P.D. No. 851 -(Whereas Clauses)
19.4 Amount and date of payment Revised Guidelines, Sec. 4
19.4.1 Basic
wage/commissions
Revised Guidelines, Sec. 4;
Songco v. NLRC, 183 SCRA 610 (1990);
Boie Takeda v. dela Serna, 228 SCRA 329
(1993); Phil. Duplicators Inc. v. NLRC, 241
SCRA 380 (1995); Iran v. NLRC, 289 SCRA
433 (1998)
19.4.2 Substitute payment Framanlis Farms, Inc. v. MOLE, 171 SCRA
87 (1989)
20 Bonus
20.1 Nature: Phil. Duplicators Inc. v. NLRC, 241 SCRA
380 (1995)
20.2 Definition; when demandable Producers Bank of the Philippines v.
NLRC, 355 SCRA 489 (2001; Eastern
Telecomunications Phil. Inc. v. Eastern
Telecoms Union, G.R. No. 185665,
February 8, 2012
21 Working conditions for special group
23
of workers
21.1 WOMEN LABOR CODE, Art. 130, 131, 132, 133, 134,
135, 136, 137, &138; Omnibus Rules, Book
III, Rule XII. See also Women in
Development and Nation Building Act, R.A.
No. 7192 (1992); and Anti-Sexual
Harassment Act of 1995, R.A. No. 7877
21.1.1 Women under the
Constitution - Art. II, Sec. 14;
Art. XIII, Sec. 14
Phil. Telegraph and Telephone Co., v.
NLRC, 272 SCRA 596 (1997)
21.1.2 Coverage Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule XII, Sec. 1
21.1.3 Prohibited acts
21.1.3.1 Night
work/exception
LABOR CODE, Arts. 130, & 131; R.A. No.
10151
21.1.3.2
Discrimination
LABOR CODE, Art. 135
21.1.3.3 Stipulation
against marriage
LABOR CODE, Art. 136; Philippine
Telegraph and Telephone Co. v. NLRC,
272 SCRA 596 (1997); Star Paper Corp. v.
Simbol, 487 SCRA 228(2006)
21.1.3.4 Discharge on
account of
pregnancy
LABOR CODE, Art. 137
21.1.4 Facilities LABOR CODE, Arts. 132 & 134
21.1.5 Special women
workers
LABOR CODE, Art. 138
21.1.6 Maternity leave Social Security Act of 1997, RA No. 8282,
Sec. 14-A
21.1.7 Sexual harassment RA No. 7877 ;
Domingo v. Rayala, G.R. No. 155831,
February 18, 2008
21.2 MINORS LABOR CODE, Arts.139 &140; Omnibus
Rules, Book III, Rule XII, Secs. 2 & 3; Special
24
Protection of Children Against Abuse,
Exploitation and Discrimination Act (R.A.
No. 7610), as amended by the Special
Protection of Children Act (R.A. No. 7658)
21.2.1 Minors under the
Constitution
CONST, Art. II, Sec. 13
21.2.2 Coverage Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule XII, Sec. 1
21.2.3 Working children LABOR CODE, Art. 139 ; RA 7610, as
amended, Secs. 12-16; DOLE Memo
Circular No. 2, s. 1998 Re: Hazardous and
non-hazardous establishments
21.2.4 Discrimination LABOR CODE, Art. 140
21.3 HOUSEHELPERS/ CAREGIVERS R.A. No. 10361; Implementing Rules and
Regulations of R.A. No. 10361;
ILO Domestic Workers Convention, 2011
(No. 189)
21.4 PROJECT EMPLOYMENT LABOR CODE, Art. 280 1st par.;
PNOC Energy Development Corp. v. NLRC,
G.R. No. 169353, April 13, 2007; Aro v. NLRC,
G.R. No. 174792, March 7, 2012; William
Construction Corp. v. Trinidad, G.R. No.
183250, March 12, 2010;
21.5 CASUAL EMPLOYEES
LABOR CODE, Art. 280 2nd par.; Omnibus
Rules, Book VI, Rule 1, Sec. 5 (b)
21.5.1 Nature of work Dealco Farms, Inc. v. NLRC, G.R. No.
153192, January 30, 2009
21.5.2 One year service Kimberly-Clark (Phils.), Inc. v. Secretary
of Labor,G.R. No. 156668, November 23,
2007
21.6 FIXED-TERM EMPLOYEES Brent School v. Zamora, G.R. Mo. L-48494,
February 5, 1990; Price v. Innodata Phil.,
Inc., G.R. No. 178505, September 30, 2008
21.7 SEASONAL EMPLOYEES Cebu Metal Corp. v. Saliling, G.R. No.
154463, September 5, 2006; Hacienda
Bino v. Cuenca, 456 SCRA 300 (2005)
25
21.8 PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEES LABOR CODE, Art. 281; 61, 2nd sentence;
Omnibus Rules, Book VI, Rule I, Sec. 6;
LABOR CODE, Art. 75 (d)
21.8.1 Definition/purpose Woodridge School v. Pe Benito, G.R. No.
160240, October 29, 2008; Cebu Marine
Beach Resort v. NLRC, G.R. No. 143252,
Oct. 23, 2003
21.8.2 Duration:
rule/exception
A Prime Security Services, Inc. v. NLRC,
322 SCRA 283 (2000); Canadian
Opportunities Unlimited, Inc. v. Dalangin,
G.R. No. 172223, February 6, 2012
21.8.3 Extension of contract Phil. Federation etc. v. NLRC, G.R. No.
121071, December 11, 1998
21.8.4 Standards - not
determined
Davao Contractors Development
Cooperative v. Pasawa, G.R. No. 172174,
July 9, 2009
21.8.5 Private school
teachers -- rule
Lacuesta v. Ateneo de Manila
University, 477 SCRA 217 (2005); Aklan
College, Inc. v. Guarino, G.R. No. 152949,
August 14, 2007
Part V
Termination of Employment
22 General Concepts
22.1 Coverage LABOR CODE, Art. 278
22.2 Security of tenure LABOR CODE, Art. 279;
22.2.1 Nature of
right/rationale
Llosa Tan v. Silahis International Hotel,
181 SCRA 738 (1990); City Services Corp.
Workers v. City Services Corp., 135 SCRA
564 (1985)
22.2.2 Coverage Inter Orient Maritime Enterprises, Inc. v.
NLRC, 235 SCRA 268 (1994); Woodridge
School v. Pe Benito, G.R. No. 160240,
October 29, 2008
22.2.3 Requisites of valid
termination
Ting v. CA, G.R. No, 146174, July 12, 2006
26
22.2.4 Measure of penalty Bago v. NLRC, G.R. No. 170001, April 4,
2007; Sagales v. Rustans Commercial
Corp., G.R. No. 166554, November 27,
2008.; Negros Slashers, Inc. v. Teng, G.R.
No. 187122, February 22, 2012
23 Termination of employment By
employee
23.1 Resignation Virgen Shipping Corp. v. Barraquio, G.R.
No. 178127, April 16, 2009; Casa Cebuana
Incorporada v. Leuterio, G.R. No.
176040, September 4, 2009; Mora v.
Avesco Marketing Corp., G.R. No.
177414, November 14, 2008
23.1.1 Just causes LABOR CODE, Art. 285 (b)
23.1.2 Without just cause LABOR CODE, Art. 285 (a)
23.2 Performance of military or
civic duty
LABOR CODE, Art. 286; Omnibus Rules,
Book VI, Rule I, Sec. 12
24 Termination of employment by
employer
24.1 Substantive requirements - just
causes
LABOR CODE, Art. 282; 279; 277 (b)
24.1.1 Basis - management
prerogative
Ocean East Agency Corp. v. NLRC, 287
SCRA 546 (1998)
24.1.2 Serious
misconduct/willful
disobedience
(insubordination)
LABOR CODE, Art. 282 (a);
Yabut v. MERALCO, G.R. No. 190436,
January 16, 2012;
First Dominion Resources Corp. v.
Penaranda, 480 SCRA 504 (2006);
Bascon v. CA, 422 SCRA 122 (2004);
Lores Realty Enterprises, Inc., v. Virginia
E. Pacia, G.R. No. 171189, March 9,
2011.
24.1.3 Gross and habitual
neglect of duties
LABOR CODE, Art. 282 (b);
Talidano v. Falcon Maritime and Allied
27
Services, Inc., G.R. No. 172031, July 14,
2008; School fo the Holy Spirit of Quezon
City v. Taguiam, G.R. No. 165565, July 14,
2008; Eastern Overseas Employment
Center, Inc. v. Bea, 476 SCRA 384 (2005)
24.1.4 Loss of trust and
confidence
LABOR CODE, Art. 282 (c);
James Ben L. Jerusalem v. Keppel
Monte Bank, et al.,G.R. No. 169564. April 6,
2011; Salas v. Aboitiz One, Inc., G.R. No.
178236, June 27, 2008; Eats-cetera Food
Services Outlet v. Letran, G.R. 179507,
October 2, 2009
24.1.5 Commission of crime LABOR CODE, Art. 282 (d)
24.1.6 Analogous causes LABOR CODE, Art. 282 (e);
Heavylift Manila, Inc. v. CA, 473 SCRA
541 (2005); John Hancock Life Insurance
Corp. v. Davis, G.R. 169549, September 3,
2008; Yrasuegui v. PAL, G.R. No. 168081,
October 17, 2008
24.1.7 Others
24.1.7.1
Abandonment
Harpoon Marine Services, Inc. v.
Francisco, GR No. 167751, March 2, 2011.
24.1.7.2 Courtesy
resignation
Batongbacal v. Associated Bank, 168
SCRA 600 (1988)
24.1.7.3 Change of
ownership
Manlimos v. NLRC, 242 SCRA 145 (1995)
24.1.7.4 Habitual
absenteeism
Quiambao v. Manila Electric Co., G.R.
No. 171023, December 18, 2009
24.1.7.5 Fixed-term
employment
Medenilla v. PVB, G.R. No. 127673; March
13, 2000; Pamantasan v. Civil Service
Commission, 241 SCRA 506 (1995)
24.1.7.6 Past offenses McDonald's (Katipunan Branch) v.
Alba, G.R. 156382, December 18, 2008
24.1.7.7 Immorality
28
24.1.7.8 Conviction of
crime
Sampaguita Garments Corp. v. NLRC,
233 SCRA 260 (1994)
24.1.8 Constructive dismissal Gilles v. CA, G.R. No. 149273, June 5, 2009.
Chiang Kai Shek College v. CA, 437
SCRA 171 (2004). La Rosa v. Ambassador
Hotel, G.R. No. 177059, March 13, 2009
24.1.9 Transfer Aguanza v. Asian Terminal Inc., G.R. No.
163505, August 14, 2009; Herida v. F&C
Pawnshop and Jewelry Store, G.R. No.
172601, April 16, 2009; PLDT v. Paguio, 472
SCRA 453 (2005)
24.1.10 Promotion Phil. Telegraph v. CA, G.R. No. 152057,
Sept. 29, 2003
24.1.11 Preventive
suspension
Old Omnibus Rules, Book V, Rule XXIV, Secs.
3 & 4;
Philippine Airlines Inc. v. NLRC, 292 SCRA
40 (1998)
24.1.12 Residency training Felix v. Buenaseda, 240 SCRA 139 (1995)
24.2 Substantive requirements -
business related causes
LABOR CODE, Art. 283
24.3 Basis - employer right Edge Apparel Inc. v. NLRC, 286 SCRA 302
(1998); Elleccion v. NLRC, G.R. No. 184735,
September 17, 2009
24.4 Business-related or authorized
causes:
24.4.1 Installation of labor-
saving devices
LABOR CODE, Art. 283
24.4.2 Retrenchment to
prevent losses
LABOR CODE, Art. 283
Flight Attendants & Stewards
Association of the Philippines v. PAL,
G.R. No. 178083, July 22, 2008; Emcor, Inc.
v. Sienes, G.R. No. 152101, September 8,
2009; Metro Construction Inc. v. Aman,
G.R. No. 168324, October 12, 2009
24.4.3 Redundancy LABOR CODE, Art. 283;
29
Lowe Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 164813, August
14, 2009; AMA v. Garcia, G.R. No. 166703,
April 14, 2008
24.4.4 Closure of business LABOR CODE, Art. 283;
Eastridge Golf Club Inc. v. Eastridge
Golf Club Inc. Labor Union, G.R. No.
166760, August 22, 2008; Elcee Farms, Inc.
v. NLRC, G.R. No. 126428, January 25, 2007
24.4.5 Temporary closure LABOR CODE, Art. 286;
Valdez v. NLRC, 286 SCRA 87 (1998);
Eagle Star Security Services, Inc. v.
Mirando, G.R. No. 179512, July 30, 2009
24.5 Disease LABOR CODE, Art. 284;
Duterte v. Kingswood Trading Co., G.R.
No. 160325, October 4, 2007; Crayon
Processing v. Pula, G.R. No. 167727, July
30, 2007
25 Procedural requirements LABOR CODE, Art. 277 (b);
Omnibus Rules, Book VI, Rule I, Secs. 1, 2 &
3
25.1 In general Phil. Movie Pictures Workers' Assciation
v. Premiere Productions, Inc., 92 Phil. 843
(1953);
Agabon v. NLRC, 442 SCRA 573 (2004);
King of Kings Transport, Inc. v. Mamac,
G.R. No. 166208, June 29, 2007
25.2 Right to counsel Salaw v. NLRC, 202 SCRA 7 (1991)
25.3 Notice Casa Cebuana Incorporada v.
Leuterio, G.R. No. 176040, September 4,
2009
25.4 Hearing Perez v. Philippine Telegraph and
Telephone Co., G.R. No. 152048, April 7,
2009; Suico. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 146762,
January 30, 2007
25.5 Decision - award Dela Cruz v. Maerks Filipinas Crewing,
Inc., G.R. No. 172038, April 14, 2008
30
25.6 Burden of proof Macasero v. Southern Industrial Gases
Phil., G.R. No. 178524, January 30, 2009;
Gallego v. Bayer Phil., Inc., G.R. No.
179807, July 31, 2009
25.7 Degree of proof Mitsubishi Motors Phils. Corp. v. Simon,
G.R. No. 164081, April 16, 2008; Rentokil
(Initial) Phil., Inc. v. Sanchez, G.R. No.
176219, December 23, 2008.
25.8 Prescription Callanta v. Carnation Phil., Inc., 145 Scra
268 (1986)
26 Reliefs/remedies in illegal dismissal LABOR CODE, Arts. 279 & 223
26.1 Reinstatement
26.1.1 Definition Pheschem Industrial Corp. v. Moldez,
458 SCRA 339 (2005); Citytrust Banking
Corp. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 104860; July 11,
1996
26.1.2 Reinstatement
pending appeal Pfizer, Inc., et al. v. Velasco, G.R. No.
177467, March 9, 2011.
26.1.3 Exceptions
26.1.3.1 Closure of
business Philippine Engineering Corp. v. CIR, 41
SCRA 102 (1971)
26.1.3.2 Prayer is for
separation pay in lieu
of reinstatement
Citytrucking, Inc. v. Balajadia, G.R. No.
160769, August 9, 2006; Pheschem
Industrial Corp. v. Moldez, 458 SCRA 339
(2005)
26.1.3.3 Economic
business conditions Electruck Asia, Inc. v. Meris, 435 SCRA
310 (2004; Union Supervisors etc. v. Sec.
Of Labor 128 SCRA 442 (1984)
26.1.3.4 Employees'
unsuitability Divine Word High School v. NLRC, 143
SCRA 346 (1986)
26.1.3.5 Employees
retirement/overage Citytrust Banking Corp. v. NLRC, G.R. No.
104860; July 11, 1996
26.1.3.6 Strained
relations Acesite Corp. v. NLRC, 449 SCRA 360
(2005); Pentagon Steel Corp. v. CA,
G.R. No. 174141, June 26, 2009.; Cabigting
31
v. San Miguel Foods Inc.,G.R. No. 167706,
November 5, 2009
26.1.3.7 Not Feasible Goma v. Pamplona Plantation, Inc.,
G.R. No. 160905, July 4, 2008
26.1.3. 8 Offer to
reinstate
Ranara v. NLRC, 212 SCRA 631 (1992)
26.2 Backwages
26.2.1Effect of failure to
order
Asian Terminals, Inc. v. NLRC, G.R. No.
158458, December 19, 2007.
26.2.2 Computation Triad Security and Allied Services, Inc. v.
Ortega, Jr., 481 SCRA 591 (2006);
Philippine Journalists, Inc. v. Mosqueda,
429 SCRA 369 (2004); PLDT v. Paguio 472
SCRA 453 (2005); Torres v. Rural Bank of San
Juan, Inc., G.R. No. 184520, March 13, 2013.
26.3 Damages and attorneys fees M + W Zander Phil., Inc. v. Enriquez, G.R.
No. 169173, June 5, 2009.
26.4 Separation pay Siemens Phil., Inc. v. Domingo, G.R. No.
150488, July 28, 2008; Nissan North EDSA
Balintawak v. Serrano, G.R. No. 162538,
June 4, 2009.
26.4.1 Computation/
rationale
Businessday Information Systems and
Services, Inc. v. NLRC, 221 SCRA 9 (1993;
PLDT v. NLRC, 164 SCRA (1988); Songco v.
NLRC, 183 SCRA 610 (1990);
26.4.2 Effect of receipt Amkor Technology Phil., Inc. v.
Juangco, G.R. No. 166507, September 27,
2006
26.5 Interest Nacar v. Gallery Frames, G.R. No. 189871,
August 13, 2013.
26.6 Financial assistance
26.5.1 When allowed/not
allowed
Luna v. Allado Construction Company,
Inc., G.R. No. 175251,May 30, 2011;
Apacible v. Multimed Industries, et
al.,G.R. No. 178903,May 30, 2011 ; Bristol
Myers Squibb v. Baban, G.R. 167449,
32
December 17, 2008; Phil. Long Distance
Tel. Co. v. NLRC, 164 SCRA 671 (1988).
26.7 Indemnity Arms Taxi v. NLRC, 219 SCRA 306 (1993)
26.8 Solidary liabilty of corporate
officers Harpoon Marine Services, Inc. v.
Francisco, GR No. 167751, March 2, 2011.
27 Retirement LABOR CODE, Art. 287; Retirement Pay Law
(RA No. 7641); Implementing Rules;
Labor Advisory on Retirement Pay (Oct.
1999);
Oxales v. Unilab, G.R. No. 152991, July 21,
2008; Quevedo v. Benguet Electric
Cooperative, Inc., G.R. No. 168927,
September 11, 2009