+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Labor Standards - Atty. Domingo Anonuevo

Labor Standards - Atty. Domingo Anonuevo

Date post: 15-Oct-2015
Category:
Upload: orionsruler
View: 547 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend

of 32

Transcript
  • 1

    LABOR STANDARDS

    LAW 200M

    Third Term, 2013-2014

    Atty. Domingo T. Aonuevo

    DLSU College of Law

    [email protected]

    +639178129948

    COURSE DESCRIPTION:

    This course is about the fundamental principles of labor law, and the law

    on recruitment and placement, labor standards, and termination of

    employment.

    LEARNING OUTCOMES (LO):

    On completion of the course, the student is expected to be able to do

    the following:

    1. State the legal bases of labor law and tell where it may be found;

    recognize the basic rights of workers and employers;

    2. Tell when an employer-employee relationship exists; differentiate job

    contracting from labor-only contracting;

    3. Distinguish labor disputes from other disputes;

    4. Tell when there is illegal recruitment; discuss the rights of apprentices,

    learners and the disabled;

    5. Restate and apply the minimum standards on hours of work, rest days,

    holidays, various leaves, minimum wages, payment and protection of

    wages, 13th month pay, and the working conditions for women, minors,

    house helps and other special groups of workers;

    6. Discuss the right to security of tenure; explain when an employee may quit

    his/her employment; identify the just and business-related causes for

    termination of employment; describe the procedural requirements of

    termination of employment; and identify the reliefs and remedies in cases

    of illegal dismissals;

  • 2

    7.7.7.7. Discuss the coverage of and the benefits under the various social

    legislations.

    8.8.8.8. Teach workers the basic labor standards.

    REQUIREMENTS AND ASSESSMENTS:

    The student will be assessed during the term by the following:

    Class participation 30.00%

    Attendance/recitation 15.00%

    Reports 15.00%

    Quizzes 20.00%

    Workers seminar 20.00%

    Final examination 30.00%

    Students should submit to DTA class cards with 1x1 photos and email

    address not later than the 2nd class day.

    Laptops and tablets may be used to take down notes but should be

    turned off/closed when owner is called to recite. All notes and books

    should be closed also during recitation.

    Consultation is by appointment or through email.

    No excuse will be accepted for failing to take a quiz or submitting a report

    or paper.

    Every student must present a report to the class on any of the topics

    identified in the course outline.

    Every gang of 2 students should be able to conduct a 2-hour seminar-

    presentation to a group of employees on any of the above topics on or

    before the last week of classes.

    LEARNING PLAN:

    LEARNING

    OUTCOME:

    Student should be

    TOPIC DAYS

    LEARNING

    ACTIVITIES

  • 3

    able to

    State the legal bases

    of labor law and tell

    where it may be

    found; recognize the

    basic rights of workers

    and employers;

    Part I:

    Introduction

    to Labor Law

    Sections 1 - 4.

    2.5 * Lecture

    * Recitation

    * Lecture

    * Recitation

    * Report on the Tonko cases

    Tell when an

    employer- employee

    relationship exists;

    differentiate job

    contracting from

    labor-only

    contracting;

    distinguish labor

    disputes from other

    disputes;

    Part I:

    Introduction

    to Labor Law

    Sections 5 & 6

    2

    Quiz on Part I

    * Lecture

    * Recitation

    * Report on training and

    employment of disabled

    persons (handicapped workers)

    Tell when there is

    illegal recruitment;

    Discuss when an alien

    may be employed;

    discuss the rights of

    apprentices, learners

    and the disabled;

    Part II:

    Recruitment

    & Placement

    of Workers/

    Alien

    Employment

    Part III:

    Human

    Resources

    Development

    2

    Quiz on Parts II & III

    * Lecture

    * Recitation

    * Report on the Kasambahay

    law

    Restate and apply

    the minimum

    standards on hours of

    work, rest days,

    holidays, various

    leaves, minimum

    wages, payment and

    protection of wages,

    13th month pay, and

    the working

    conditions for

    women, minors,

    house helps and

    other special groups

    of workers;

    Part IV: Labor

    Standards 3

    Quiz on Part IV

  • 4

    * Lecture

    * Recitation

    * Report on FASAP v. PAL, G.R.

    No. 178083

    Discuss the right to

    security of tenure;

    explain when an

    employee may

    terminate his/her

    employment; identify

    the just and business-

    related causes for

    termination of

    employment;

    describe the

    procedural

    requirements of

    termination of

    employment; and

    identify the reliefs and

    remedies in cases of

    illegal dismissals;

    Part V:

    Termination

    of

    Employment

    3

    Quiz on Part V

    REFERENCES:

    SALVADOR A. POQUIZ, LABOR STANDARDS LAW WITH NOTES AND

    COMMENTS, 2012 EDITION;

    C.A. AZUCENA, JR., THE LABOR CODE WITH COMMENTS AND CASES, VOL. I,

    2010 EDITION;

    Nota bene:

    Most of the case titles below are hyperlinked to websites containing

    the cases' full texts.

  • 5

    Part I:

    INTRODUCTION TO LABOR LAW

    1 Labor law, defined

    2 Labor law, classified

    3 Legal bases of labor law

    3.1 Police power of the State Philippine Association of Service

    Exporters, Inc. v. Drilon, 163 SCRA 386

    (1988); St. Lukes Medical Center

    Employees Association-AFW v. NLRC, 517

    SCRA 677 (2007); Magana v. Medicard

    Phil., Inc., 638 SCRA 606 (2010)

    3.2 Specific provisions of the 1987

    Constitution

    3.2.1 Social Justice

    1987 Constitution, Art. II, Secs. 5 & 10; Art. XIII,

    Secs. 1 & 2;

    3.2.1.1 Defined Calalang v. Williams, 70 Phil. 726 (1940); Fr.

    Joaquin Bernas, The 1987 Philippine

    Constitution: A Reviewer-Primer, 1987 ed., p.

    23.

    3.2.1.1 Applied HFS Phil., Inc. v. Pilar, G.R. No. 168716, April

    16, 2009; PLDT v. NLRC, 164 SCRA (1988);

    Toyota Motor Phil. Corp. Workers

    Association v. NLRC, G.R. No. 158786,

    October 19, 2007; Paloma v. PAL, G.R. No.

    163607, July 14, 2008;

    3.2.1.3 Protection of

    labor

    CONST., Art. II, Sec. 18; Art XIII, Sec. 3.;

    Cebu Royal Plant v. Hon Deputy Minister

    of Labor, 153 SCRA 38 (1987); Gregorio

    Araneta University Foundation v. NLRC,

    155 SCRA 301(1987); Quitoriano v. Jebsens

    Maritime, Inc., G.R. No. 179868, January 21,

    2010.

    3.2.1.3 Right to due

    process and right to

    labor as property

    CONST., Art. IIL, Sec. 1;

    Callanta v. Carnation Philippines, Inc.,

    145 SCRA 268 (1986); Phil. Movie Pictures

    Workers' Asso. v. Premiere Productions,

    Inc., 92 Phil. 843 (1953).

  • 6

    3.2.3 Gender equality and

    protection of women

    CONST., Art. II, Sec. 14; Art. XIII, Sec. 14

    Suggested reading: Emily Salcedo,

    Romantic Paternalism in Philippine Labor

    Law Revisiting the Tradition, Realizing its

    Folly, and Proposing Reconstruction in the

    Light of American Experience, DLSU Business

    & Economics Review, 21.1 (2011), pp. 77-96.

    3.2.4 Right of government

    employees to organize

    CONST., Art. IX-B, Sec. 2(5); Art. III, Sec. 8

    3.2.5 Protection to rights of

    employer

    CONST., Art. II, Sec. 20 and Art. XIII, Sec. 3,

    par. 4;

    3.2.6.1 Definition &

    Scope of

    Management

    Prerogatives (MP)

    Chu v. NLRC, 232 SCRA 764 (1994); San

    Miguel Brewery Sales Force Union

    (PTGWO) v. Ople, 170 SCRA 25 (1989);

    Philippine Airlines, Inc. v. NLRC, 225 SCRA

    301 (1993); Royal Plant Workers Union v.

    Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc.

    Cebu Plant, G.R. No. 198783; April 15,

    2013

    3.2.6.2 Limits of MP SHS Perforated Materials, Inc. v. Diaz, 633

    SCRA 258 (2010); Supreme Steel Corp. v.

    Nagkakaisang Manggagawa Ng

    Supreme Independent Union (Nms-Ind-

    Apl), G.R. No. 185556, March 28, 2011; PLDT

    v. Paguio, G.R. No. 152689, October 12,

    2005; Businessday Information Systems and

    Services, Inc. v. NLRC, 221 SCRA 9 (1993)

    3.3 Civil Code CIVIL CODE, Arts. 1700 & 1701;

    Brew Master International v. National

    Federation of Labor Unions, 271 SCRA 275

    (1997); PNCC Skyway Traffic

    Management and Security Division

    Workers Organization (PSTMSDWO) v.

    PNCC Skyway Corp., 613 SCRA 28 (2010)

    4 Sources of labor law

  • 7

    4.1 The Labor Code and its

    implementing rules

    4.1.1 Brief history Poquiz, pp. 3-4, 37-38; Azucena, pp. 15-17

    4.1.2 Name of Decree LABOR CODE, Art. 1

    4.1.3 Date of Effectivity Id., Art. 2

    4.1.4 Declaration of Basic

    Policy

    Id., Art. 3; CONST. (1973), Art. II, Sec. 9;

    CONST., Art. XIII, Sec. 3

    4.1.5 Construction in favor of

    Labor

    LABOR CODE, Art. 4; CIVIL CODE, Art. 1702

    Reyes v. CA, 409 SCRA 267 (2003); J.K.

    Mercado & Sons Agricultural Enterprises,

    Inc. v. Hon. Patricia Sto. Tomas, G.R. No.

    158084, August 29, 2008; PNCC Skyway

    Traffic Management and Security

    Division Workers Organization

    (PSTMSDWO) v. PNCC Skyway Corp., 613

    SCRA 28 (2010)

    4.1.6 Rule-making power,

    limitations

    LABOR CODE, Art. 5;

    Insular Bank of Asia and America

    Employees' Union v. inciong, G.R. No. L-

    52415, October 23, 1984

    4.1.7 Applicability LABOR CODE, Art. 6

    4.1.7.1 Overseas

    Workers

    Sim v. NLRC, G.R. No. 157376, October 2,

    2007; Santiago v. CF Sharp Crew

    Management, G.R. No. 162419, July 10,

    2007

    4.1.7.2

    Government

    employees

    CONST., Art. IX-B, Sec. 2(1); LABOR CODE,

    Art. 276;

    NASECO v. NLRC, G.R. No. L-70295,

    November 29, 1988; PNOC-Energy

    Development Corp. v. NLRC, 201 SCRA

    487 (1991)

    Liban v. Gordon, G.R. No. 175352, January

  • 8

    18, 2011, July 15, 2009

    4.1.7.3 Employees of

    International

    Organizations and

    Specialized Agencies

    International Catholic Migration

    Commission v. Calleja, 190 SCRA 130

    (1990)

    4.1.8 Enforcement and

    Sanctions

    LABOR CODE, Art. 128; D.O. No. 131-13 &

    D.O. No. 57-04;

    LABOR CODE, Arts.129 & 223 (a) (2), (3), (4),

    & (6), 294, 295, 296, 297, & 298; CONST., Art.

    III, Secs. 11 & 16

    4.2 Decisions of the courts and

    quasi-judicial bodies

    Callanta v. Carnation Phil., Inc., 145 SCRA

    268 (1986)

    4.3 Labor Contracts CIVIL CODE, Arts. 1305 & 1306;

    Supreme Steel Corp. v. Nagkakaisang

    Manggagawa Ng Supreme

    Independent Union (Nms-Ind-Apl), G.R.

    No. 185556, March 28, 2011; Mariveles

    Shipyard Corp. v. CA, G.R. No. 144134,

    November 11, 2003

    4.4 Company Practice

    Central Azucarera De Tarlac v. Central

    Azucarera De Tarlac Labor Union-NLU,

    G.R. No. 188949, July 26, 2010; Metropolitan

    Bank and Trust Co. v. NLRC, G.R. No.

    152928, June 18,2009; Pag-asa Steel Works,

    Inc. v. CA, 486 SCRA 475 (2006)

    4.5 Company Policy Kimberly-Clark Phil., Inc. v. Dimayuga,

    G.R. No. 177705, September 18, 2009; China

    Banking Corp. v. Borromeo, G.R. No.

    148415, July 14, 2008; GTE Directories Corp.

    v. Sanchez, 197 SCRA 452, 466 (1991)

    5 Work Relationship

    5.1 Definition: Employer &

    Employee

    LABOR CODE, Arts. 97 (a), (b), (c); 167 (f), (g)

    & (h); 212 (e) & (f)

    A.C. Ransom Labor Union v. NLRC, 142

  • 9

    SCRA 269 (1988); Orlando Farms Growers

    Association v. NLRC, 299 SCRA 364,

    November 25, 1998; Far Eastern University

    v. CIR, 5 SCRA 1080 (1962)

    5.2 Employer-Employee

    Relationship: Factors/Tests

    Sonza v. ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corp.,

    431 SCRA 381(1904); Semblante v. CA, G.R.

    No. 196426, August 15, 2011; Sy v. CA, G.R.

    No. 142293, Feb. 27, 2003; Perpetual Help

    Credit v. Faburada, G.R. No. 121948,

    October 8, 2001; Jardin v. NLRC, 326 SCRA

    299 (2000); Corporal Sr. v. NLRC, 341 SCRA

    658 (2000);; Ruga v. NLRC, 181 SCRA 266

    (1990); Mendiola v. CA, G.R. No. 159333,

    July 31, 2006; Tongko v. The

    Manufacturers Life Insurance Co. (Phils.)

    Inc., G.R. No. 167622, November 7, 2008,

    June 29, 2010, & January 25, 2011; Locsin v.

    PLDT, G.R. 185251, October 2, 2009;

    Francisco v. NLRC, G.R. No. 170087, August

    31, 2006; Teng v. Pahagac, 635 SCRA

    172(2010)

    5.3 Independent Contractor and

    Labor-only Contractor

    LABOR CODE, Arts. 106, 107, 108 &109; D.O.

    No. 18-A (2011)

    Phil. Bank Communications v. NLRC, 146

    SCRA 347 (1986); San Miguel Corp. v.

    Maerc Integrated Services, Inc.; G.R. No.

    144672, July 10, 2003; Wack Wack Golf and

    Country Club v. NLRC, 456 SCRA 280

    (2005); Aliviado v. Proctor and Gamble

    Phils., Inc., G.R. No. 160506, March 9, 2010;

    Spic n Span Services Corp. v. Gloria

    Paje, et al., G.R. No. 174084, August 25,

    2010;

    5.4 Liability of Indirect Employer GSIS v. NLRC, 635 SCRA 251 (2010);

    Mariveles Shipyard Corp. v. CA, 415 SCRA

    573 (2003)

    6 Labor disputes Labor Code (LC), Art. 218 (l);

    Feati University v. Bautista, 18 SCRA 1190

    (1966); San Miguel Corp. Employees

    Union v. Bersamira, G.R. No. 87700, June

    13, 1990; Halaguea v. PAL, G.R. No.

  • 10

    172013, October 2, 2009; Nestle Phils., Inc.

    v. NLRC, G.R. No. 85197, March 18, 1991;

    Jaguar Security and Investigation

    Agency v. Sales, G.R. No. 162420, April 16,

    2008;

    Part II:

    RECRUITMENT AND PLACEMENT OF WORKERS/ALIEN EMPLOYMENT

    7 Recruitment and Placement of Workers Suggested reading:

    Julyn S. Ambito and Melissa Suzette L.

    Banzon, Review of Philippine Migration

    Laws and Regulations: Gains, Gaps,

    Prospects.

    7.1 Definition LABOR CODE, Art. 13(b);

    People v. Panis, 142 SCRA 667 [1986)

    7.2 Employment Policies

    7.3 Employment Agencies/Entities

    7.3.1 Allowed entities LABOR CODE, Arts. 16, 18, 25 & 12(f);

    Omnibus Rules, Book I, Rules III, IV, VII Sec

    1.

    7.3.2 Private employment

    agency

    LABOR CODE, Art. 13(c) & (d)

    7.3.3 Private recruitment

    entity

    LABOR CODE, Art. 13(e) & (f)

    7.3.4 Public employment

    offices

    LABOR CODE, Art. 12(f) & 14(a); E.O. No.

    247 (1987), Sec. 3 (f),

    7.3.5 Prohibited entity LABOR CODE, Arts. 18, 16, 25 & 26; 2002

    POEA Rules and Regulations Governing the

    Recruitment and Employment of Land-

    based Overseas Workers (2002 POEA

    Rules), Part II, Rule 1, Sec. 2; 2003 POEA

    Rules,and Regulations Governing the

    Recruitment and Employment of Seafarers

    (2003 POEA Rules), Part II, Rule I, Sec. 2

    7.4 Government techniques of

    regulation - private recruitment

  • 11

    7.4.1 Licensing LABOR CODE, Arts. 27, 28, 29, 30 & 31;

    2002 POEA Rules, Part II, Rule II, Secs. 1, 4, 6

    & 7; 2003 POEA Rules, and Regulations

    Governing the Recruitment and

    Employment of Seafarers (2003 POEA

    Rules), Part II, Rule I (a) & (b); Rule II, Secs.

    1, 4, 6 & 7

    7.4.2 Workers Fee LABOR CODE, Art. 32

    7.4.3 Reports/employment

    information

    LABOR CODE, Art. 33

    7.5 Prohibited practices LABOR CODE, Art. 34

    7.6 Illegal recruitment LABOR CODE, Art. 38(a) & (b); R.A. No.

    8042, as amended, Sec. 6;

    Boneng v. People; G.R. No. 133563,

    March 4, 1999; People v. Gallo, G.R. No.

    185277, March 18, 2010; People v. Hu,

    G.R. No. 182232, October 6, 2008; People

    v. Chua, G.R. No. 184058; March 10, 2010;

    People v. Laogo, G.R. No. 176264,

    January 10, 2011; Salazar v. Achacoso,

    183 SCRA 145 (1990)

    7.7 Enforcement & sanctions LABOR CODE, Arts. 35, 36, 37, 38 & 39; R.A.

    No. 8042, Secs. 6, 7, & 10;

    Serrano v. Gallant Maritime Services,

    Inc., G.R. No. 16714, March 24, 2009;

    Eastern Assurance and Surety Corp. v.

    Sec. of Labor, 181 SCRA 110 (1990); Sto.

    Tomas v. Salac, G.R. No. 152642, December 5, 2012;

    7.7.1 Joint and several

    liability of private

    employment agency/

    manning agent and

    employer

    R.A. No. 8042, as amended, Sec. 10, pars.

    2 & 3; 2002 POEA Rules, Part II, Rule II,

    Sec. 1(f)(3); 2003 POEA Rules, Part II, Rule

    II, Sec. 1(e)(8);

    Datuman v. First Cosmopolitan

    Manpower and Promotion Services,

    Inc., G.R. No. 156029, November 14, 2008

  • 12

    7.8 Jurisdiction

    7.8.1 Regional Trial Court, for

    criminal action for illegal

    recruitment

    R.A. No. 8042, Sec. 9

    7.8.2 NLRC, for money claims

    arising from employer-

    employee relations

    R.A. No. 8042, Sec. 10;

    Serrano v. Gallant Maritime Services,

    Inc., G.R. No. 16714, March 24, 2009.

    7.8.3 POEA, for administrative

    and disciplinary actions

    Omnibus Rules Implementing R.A. No.

    8042, Sec. 28

    8 Alien employment regulation CONST., Art. XII, Sec. 12; Anti-Dummy Law

    (Com. Act No. 108), Sec. 2-A, as

    amended, in rel. to CONST., Art. XVI, Sec.

    11(1), Art. XVI, Sec. 11(2), Art. XII, Sec. 11;

    INVESTMENT CODE, Art. 76, par. 2; LABOR

    CODE, Arts. 40, 41 & 42; Omnibus Rules,

    Book I, Rule XIV; D.O. No. 97-09 (Revised

    Rules for Issuance of Employment Permits

    to Foreign Nationals)

    8.1 Coverage D.O. 97-09 , Secs. 1 & 2;

    Almodiel v. NLRC, 223 SCRA 341 (1993)

    8.2 Conditions for grant of permit LABOR CODE, Art. 40; D.O. 97-09 , Sec. 10;

    WPP Marketing Communications, Inc.

    v. Galera, 616 SCRA 422 (2010); General

    Milling Corp. v. Torres, 196 SCRA 215

    (1991)

    Part III

    HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT

    9 Development of human resources LABOR CODE, Arts. 57-81; Technical

    Education and Skills Development Act

    (TESDA) of 1994 (R.A. No. 7796); Dual Training

    Systems Act of 1994 (R.A. No. 7686); Magna

    Carta for Disabled Persons of 1992 (R.A. No.

    7277)

    9.1 Policy, goals & objectives R.A. No. 7796, Secs. 2 & 3

    10 Training and employment of

    apprentices

  • 13

    10.1 Apprentices, defined LABOR CODE, Art. 58 ; R.A. No. 7796, Sec. 4

    (j), (k), (l), & (m). See also: Child Abuse Law

    of 1992 (R.A. No. 7610), as amended by R.A.

    No. 7658, re: employment of children below

    15 years

    10.2 When apprentices may be

    employed

    Century Canning Corp. v. CA, 530 SCRA

    501(2007); Nitto Enterprises v. NLRC, 248

    SCRA 654 (1995); Atlanta Industries v.

    Sebolino, G.R. Mo. 187320, January 26, 2011

    10.3 Conditions of employment LABOR CODE, Arts. 61, 72 &124, last par.

    10.4 Enforcement LABOR CODE, Arts. 65, 66, & 67

    11 Training and employment of learners

    11.1 Learners, defined LABOR CODE, Art. 73; R.A. No. 7796, Sec.

    4(n)

    11.2 When learners may be

    employed

    LABOR CODE, Art. 74; R.A. No. 7796, Sec.

    4(n)

    11.3 Conditions of employment LABOR CODE, Arts. 75, 76 & 124, last par.

    12 Training and employment of disabled

    persons (handicapped workers) LABOR CODE, Arts. 78, 79, 80, & 81; Magna

    Carta for Disabled Persons of 1992 (R.A. No.

    7277)

    12.1 Definition R.A. No. 7277, Sec. 4(a), (b), (c), & (d)

    12.2 Policy declaration R.A. No. 7277, Sec. 2

    12.3 Coverage R.A. No. 7277, Sec. 3

    12.4 Rights and privileges R.A. No. 7277, Secs. 5, & 6

    Bernardo v. NLRC, 310 SCRA 186 (1999)

    Part IV

    LABOR STANDARDS

    13 HOURS OF WORK LABOR CODE, Arts. 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87,

    88, 89 & 90; Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rules I,

    IA, & II

    13.1 Regulation; rationale Manila Terminal Co. Inc., v. CIR, 91 Phil.

    625, 636 (1952)

  • 14

    13.2 Coverage: all employees, in

    general

    LABOR CODE, Arts. 82 & 276; Omnibus

    Rules, Book III, Rule I, Secs. 1 & 2

    13.3 Exemptions

    13.3.1 Government

    employees

    CONST., Art. IX-B, Sec. 2(1)

    13.3.2 Managerial

    employees

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 2(b) &

    (c);

    San Miguel Corp. v. Layoc, Jr., 537 SCRA

    77 (2007)

    13.3.2.1 Rationale NAWASA v. NAWASA Consolidated

    Unions, 11 SCRA 766, 776 to 779 (1964)

    13.3.2.2 Supervisors

    are managerial

    employees

    National Sugar Refineries Corp. v. NLRC,

    G.R. No. 101761, March 24, 1993.

    13.3.3 Field personnel Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 2 (f);

    Far East Agricultural Supply, Inc. v.

    Lebatique, 515 SCRA 491(2007); Mercidar

    Fishing Corp. v. NLRC, 297 SCRA 440

    (1998); Union of Filipro Employees v.

    Vivar, 205 SCRA 200 (1992)

    13.3.4 Dependent family

    members

    13.3.5 Domestic helpers LABOR CODE, Arts. 141 &145; Omnibus

    Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 2 (d)

    13.3.6 Persons in the

    personal service of another

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 2 (d)

    13.3.7 Piece workers Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule VII, Sec. 8 (e);

    Labor Congress of the Philippines v.

    NLRC, 290 SCRA 509 (1998)

    13.4 Normal hours of work LABOR CODE, Art. 83

    13.4.1 Change in work hours

  • 15

    13.4.1.1 A

    management

    prerogative

    Union Carbide Labor Union v. Union

    Carbide Phils., Inc., 215 SCRA 554 (1992)

    13.4.1.2 Compressed

    work week

    Department Order (D.O.) No. 21, Series of

    1990, Guidelines on the Implementation of

    Compressed Workweek; Department

    Advisory No. 02-04; Department Advisory

    No. 02-09:

    Bisig Manggagawa sa Tryco v. NLRC,

    G.R. No 1513098, October 15, 2008

    13.5 Compensable hours of work -

    in general

    13.5.1 On duty LABOR CODE, Art. 84(a); Omnibus Rules,

    Book III, Rule I, Sec. 3 (a) & Sec. 4 (a)

    13.5.2 At work LABOR CODE, Art. 84 (b); Omnibus Rules,

    Book III, Rule I, Sec. 3 (b)

    13.6 Specific rules

    13.6.1 Rest period

    13.6.1.1 Short duration

    or coffee break

    LABOR CODE, Art. 84, 2nd par.; Omnibus

    Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 7, 2nd par.

    13.6.1.2 More than 20

    minutes

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 4 (b)

    13.6.2 Meal period

    13.6.2.1 Regular meal

    period (one hour)

    LABOR CODE, Art. 85; Omnibus Rules, Book

    III, Rule I, Sec. 7, 1st par.;

    Philippine Airlines v. NLRC, 302 SCRA 582

    (1999)

    13.6.2.2 Shorter meal

    period (less than one

    hour but not less than

    20 min.)

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 7, 1st

    par.

    13.6.3 Waiting time Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 5 (a);

    Arica v. NLRC, 170 SCRA 776 (89)

  • 16

    13.6.4 On call Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 5 (b)

    13.6.5 Inactive due to work

    interruptions

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 4 (d);

    University of Pangasinan Faculty Union

    v. University of Pangasinan, G.R. No. L-

    63122, February 20, 1984

    13.6.6 Work after normal

    hours

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 4 (c)

    13.6.7 Lectures, meeting,

    trainings

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Sec. 6

    13.6.8 Travel time Rada v. NLRC, 205 SCRA 69 (1992)

    13.6.9 "No Work, No Pay"

    principle

    University of Pangasinan Faculty Union

    v. NLRC, 127 SCRA 691 (1984); Prieto v.

    NLRC, 226 SCRA 232 (1993)

    13.7 Overtime work/pay LABOR CODE, Arts. 87, 88, 89 & 90;

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule I, Secs. 8, 9, &

    10

    13.7.1 In general LABOR CODE, Art. 87

    13.7.1.1 Rationale for

    overtime pay

    PNB v. Phil. National Bank Employees

    Association, 115 SCRA 507 (1982)

    13.7.1.2 Overtime

    work: voluntary/

    consensual

    LABOR CODE, Art. 87

    Interphil Laboratories Employees' Union-

    FFW v. Interphil Laboratories, Inc., G.R.

    No. 142824, December 19, 2001.

    13.7.1.3 Overtime

    instruction, not

    required

    William Lines, Inc. v. Lopez, 96 SCRA 593

    (1980)

    13.7.1.4 But evidence

    of performance of

    overtime work

    required

    Cagampan v. NLRC, G.R. No. 85122-24,

    March 22, 1991

    13.7.1.5 No offsetting

    of overtime with

    under time

    LABOR CODE, Art. 88

  • 17

    13.7.2 Emergency or

    compulsory overtime work

    LABOR CODE, Art. 89;

    13.7.3 Computation LABOR CODE, Art. 90

    13.8Night work LABOR CODE, Art. 86; Omnibus Rules, Book

    III, Rule II, Secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6

    14 WEEKLY REST PERIODS LABOR CODE, Arts. 91, 92 & 93; Omnibus

    Rules, Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule III, Secs.

    1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 9

    14.1 Coverage LABOR CODE, Arts. 82 & 91

    14.2 Determination, compulsory

    work; compensation

    LABOR CODE, Arts. 91, 92 & 93;

    15 HOLIDAYS LABOR CODE, Art. 94; R.A. No. 9849;

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule IV

    15.1 Coverage LABOR CODE, Art. 94 (a);

    Mantrade/ FMMC Division Employees

    and Workers Union v. Bacungan, 144

    SCRA 510 (1986)

    15.1.1 Exception: retail

    establishment

    LABOR CODE, Art. 94 (a); Rules

    Implementing R.A. No. 6727, par. f

    15.1.2 Exception: service

    establishment

    LABOR CODE, Art. 94 (a); Rules

    Implementing R.A. No. 6727, par. g

    15.2 Holiday pay LABOR CODE, Art. 94(c);

    Asian Transmission Corp. v. CA, G.R. No.

    144664, May 15, 2004

    15.2.1 Faculty in private

    school

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule IV, Sec. 8 (a);

    Jose Rizal College v. NLRC, 156 SCRA 27

    (1987)

    15.2.2 Divisor as factor Trans-Asia Phil. Employees Association v.

    NLRC, 320 SCRA 347 (1999);

    15.2.3 Sunday Wellington Investment Inc. v. Trajano,

    245 SCRA 561 (1995)

    15.2.4 Muslim holiday SMC v. CA, 375 SCRA 311 (2002)

  • 18

    16 SERVICE INCENTIVE LEAVE, PATERNITY

    LEAVE AND PARENTAL LEAVE Art. 95; Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule V;

    Paternity Leave Act of 1996 (RA 8187); Solo

    Parents Welfare Act of 2000 (RA 8972)

    16.1 Service incentive leave

    coverage

    LABOR CODE, Art. 95 (a) (b); Omnibus

    Rules, Book III, Rule V;

    Makati Haberdashery Inc. v. NLRC, 179

    SCRA 449 (1989); Labor Congress v.

    NLRC, 290 SCRA 509 (1998); Serrano v.

    Severino Santos Transit, 627 SCRA

    483(2010)

    16.2 Paternity leave Paternity Leave Act of 1996 (R.A. No.

    8187), Secs. 1-6; Impl. Guidelines

    16.3 Parental leave Solo Parents Welfare Act of 2000 (R.A. No.

    8972)

    17 SERVICE CHARGES LABOR CODE, Art. 96; Omnibus Rules, Book

    III, Rule VI

    17.1 Covered employees/sharing LABOR CODE, Art. 96

    18 MINIMUM WAGES AND WAGE FIXING

    MACHINERY

    18.1 Minimum wages LABOR CODE, Art. 99; CONST., Art. XIII, Sec.

    3

    18.1.1 Rule

    18.1.1.1 No work, no

    pay/ a fair days

    wage for a fair days

    labor

    Aklan Electric Corp., Inc. v. NLRC, 323

    SCRA 258 (2000); Social Security System v.

    SSS Supervisors' Union, 117 SCRA

    746(1982)

    18.1.1.2 Equal pay for

    work of equal value

    LABOR CODE, Art. 135;

    International School Alliance of

    Educators v. Quisumbing, G.R. No.

    128845, June 1, 2000

    18.1.1.3 Form:

    agreement for

    compensation of

    services

    Arms Taxi v. NLRC, 219 SCRA 306 (1993)

    18.1.2 Coverage LABOR CODE, Arts. 97 (b), (c ) & (e) & 98;

  • 19

    Phil. Fisheries Development Authority v.

    NLRC,213 SCRA 621 (1992)

    18.1.3 Minimum wage LABOR CODE, Arts. 99, 97(f), 61, 75(c), &

    80(b);

    R.A. No. 9547, Sec. 2

    18.1.4 Determination of

    compliance with minimum

    wage

    Iran v. NLRC, 289 SCRA 433 (1998)

    18.1.5 Facilities and

    supplements/allowances

    Millares v. NLRC, 305 SCRA 500 (1999); SLL

    International Cables Specialist v. NLRC,

    644 SCRA 411 (2011)

    18.1.6 Cash

    wage/commission

    Songco v. NLRC, 183 SCRA 610 (1990);

    Boie Takeda v. De la Serna, 228 SCRA

    329 (1993); Phil. Duplicators v. NLRC, 241

    SCRA 380 (1995)

    18.1.7 Gratuity and

    salary/wages, difference

    Plastic Town Center Corp. v. NLRC, 172

    SCRA 580 (1989)

    18.1.8 Effect on benefits - LABOR CODE, Art. 100;

    Davao Fruits Corp. v. ALU, 225 SCRA 562

    (1993)

    18.2 Wage-fixing machinery Wage Rationalization Act (R.A. No. 6727)

    which amended Art. 120-127 & Omnibus

    Rules, Book III, Rule IX

    18.2.1 Rationale for wage

    rationalization

    RA 6727, Sec. 2

    18.2.2 Agencies in wage

    fixing machinery

    18.2.2.1 National

    Wages and

    Productivity

    Commission

    RA 6727, Sec. 3; LABOR CODE, Arts. 120,

    121 & 126

    18.2.2.2 Regional

    Tripartite Wages and

    RA 6727, Sec. 3; LABOR CODE, Arts. 122,

    126

  • 20

    Productivity Board Nasipit Lumber Co. v. NWPC, 289 SCRA

    667 (98)

    18.2.3 Standards/criteria for

    minimum wage fixing

    RA 6727, Sec. 3; LABOR CODE, Art. 124

    18.2.4 Wage order LABOR CODE, Arts. 123 & 124

    18.2.4.1 Methods of

    fixing

    18.2.4.1.1 Floor

    wage method

    18.2.4.1.2

    Salary - ceiling

    method

    Employers Confederation of the

    Philippines v. NWPC, 201 SCRA 759 (1991)

    18.2.4.2 Validity Cagayan Sugar Milling Co. v. Secretary,

    284 SCRA 150 (1998); Metropolitan Bank

    and Trust Company, Inc. v. NWPC, 514

    SCRA 346(2007)

    18.2.4.3 Wage

    distortion

    LABOR CODE, Art. 124;

    Prubankers Association v. Prudential

    Bank & Trust Co., 302 SCRA 74 (1999); P.I.

    Manufacturing, Inc., v. P.I.

    Manufacturing Supervisors and

    Foremen Association, 543 SCRA 613

    (2008)

    18.3 WAGE PAYMENT AND

    PROTECTION

    LABOR CODE, Arts. 102, 103, 104, &105;

    Civil Code, Art. 1705

    18.3.1 Form of payment LABOR CODE, Art. 102; Civil Code, Art.

    1705;

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule VIII, Secs. 1 &

    2;

    Congson v. NLRC, 243 SCRA 260 (1995)

    18.3.2 Time of payment LABOR CODE, Art. 103; Sec. 3

    18.3.3 Place of payment LABOR CODE, Art. 104; Sec. 4

    18.3.4 Direct payment of LABOR CODE, Art. 105; Omnibus Rules,

  • 21

    wages Book III, Rule VIII, Secs. 5 & 6;

    Bermiso v. Escano Inc., 105 Phil. 231

    (1959)

    18.4 WAGE PROHIBITIONS

    18.4.1 Prohibition against

    interference in disposal of

    wages

    LABOR CODE, Art. 112; Omnibus Rules,

    Book III, Rule VIII, Sec. 12

    18.4.2 Prohibition against

    wage deduction

    LABOR CODE, Art. 113; Omnibus Rules,

    Book III, Rule VIII, Sec. 13;

    Apodaca v. NLRC, 172 SCRA 442 (1989)

    18.4.3 Prohibition against

    requirement to make

    deposits for loss or damage

    LABOR CODE, Art. 114 & 115; Omnibus

    Rules, Book III, Rule VIII, Sec. 14;

    Dentech Manufacturing Corp. v. NLRC,

    172 SCRA 588 (1989); Five J Taxi v. NLRC,

    235 SCRA 556 (1994)

    18.4.4 Prohibition against

    withholding of wages

    LABOR CODE, Art.116; Civil Code, Art. 1706

    18.4.5 Prohibition against

    deduction to ensure

    employment

    LABOR CODE, Art. 117

    18.4.6 Prohibition against

    retaliatory measures

    LABOR CODE, Art. 118

    18.4.7 Prohibition against

    false reporting

    LABOR CODE, Art. 119; Omnibus Rules,

    Book III, Rule X, Sec. 13

    18.4.8 Prohibition

    against keeping of

    employees records

    in a place other than

    the workplace

    Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule X, Sec. 11;

    South Motorists Enterprises v. Tosoc, 181

    SCRA 386 (1990)

    18.4.9 Prohibition

    against garnishment/

    execution

    Civil Code, Art. 1708;

    Gaa v. CA, 140 SCRA 304 (1985)

    18.5 WORKERS PREFERENCE IN THE LABOR CODE, Art. 110; Civil Code, 1707,

    2241, 2242, 2244;

  • 22

    EVENT OF BANKRUPTCY DBP v. Secretary of Labor, G.R. 79351,

    November 28, 1989; Barayoga v. Asset

    Privatization Trust, 473 SCRA 690 (2005)

    18.6 WAGE RECOVERY/

    JURISDICTION

    LABOR CODE, Arts. 128, 129, 217, & 111;

    Balladares v. Paek Ventures Corp., G.R.

    No. 161794, June 16, 2009; Meteoro v.

    Creative Creatures, Inc., G.R. No. 171275,

    July 13, 2009.

    19 Thirteenth month pay Pres. Decree No. 851

    19.1 History of the law Dentech Manufacturing Corp. v. NLRC,

    172 SCRA 588 (1989)

    19.2 Coverage Revised Guidelines on the Implementation

    of 13th Month Pay Law (Revised

    Guidelines);

    Archilles Manufacturing Corp. v. NLRC,

    244 SCRA 750 (1995)

    19.3 Rationale P.D. No. 851 -(Whereas Clauses)

    19.4 Amount and date of payment Revised Guidelines, Sec. 4

    19.4.1 Basic

    wage/commissions

    Revised Guidelines, Sec. 4;

    Songco v. NLRC, 183 SCRA 610 (1990);

    Boie Takeda v. dela Serna, 228 SCRA 329

    (1993); Phil. Duplicators Inc. v. NLRC, 241

    SCRA 380 (1995); Iran v. NLRC, 289 SCRA

    433 (1998)

    19.4.2 Substitute payment Framanlis Farms, Inc. v. MOLE, 171 SCRA

    87 (1989)

    20 Bonus

    20.1 Nature: Phil. Duplicators Inc. v. NLRC, 241 SCRA

    380 (1995)

    20.2 Definition; when demandable Producers Bank of the Philippines v.

    NLRC, 355 SCRA 489 (2001; Eastern

    Telecomunications Phil. Inc. v. Eastern

    Telecoms Union, G.R. No. 185665,

    February 8, 2012

    21 Working conditions for special group

  • 23

    of workers

    21.1 WOMEN LABOR CODE, Art. 130, 131, 132, 133, 134,

    135, 136, 137, &138; Omnibus Rules, Book

    III, Rule XII. See also Women in

    Development and Nation Building Act, R.A.

    No. 7192 (1992); and Anti-Sexual

    Harassment Act of 1995, R.A. No. 7877

    21.1.1 Women under the

    Constitution - Art. II, Sec. 14;

    Art. XIII, Sec. 14

    Phil. Telegraph and Telephone Co., v.

    NLRC, 272 SCRA 596 (1997)

    21.1.2 Coverage Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule XII, Sec. 1

    21.1.3 Prohibited acts

    21.1.3.1 Night

    work/exception

    LABOR CODE, Arts. 130, & 131; R.A. No.

    10151

    21.1.3.2

    Discrimination

    LABOR CODE, Art. 135

    21.1.3.3 Stipulation

    against marriage

    LABOR CODE, Art. 136; Philippine

    Telegraph and Telephone Co. v. NLRC,

    272 SCRA 596 (1997); Star Paper Corp. v.

    Simbol, 487 SCRA 228(2006)

    21.1.3.4 Discharge on

    account of

    pregnancy

    LABOR CODE, Art. 137

    21.1.4 Facilities LABOR CODE, Arts. 132 & 134

    21.1.5 Special women

    workers

    LABOR CODE, Art. 138

    21.1.6 Maternity leave Social Security Act of 1997, RA No. 8282,

    Sec. 14-A

    21.1.7 Sexual harassment RA No. 7877 ;

    Domingo v. Rayala, G.R. No. 155831,

    February 18, 2008

    21.2 MINORS LABOR CODE, Arts.139 &140; Omnibus

    Rules, Book III, Rule XII, Secs. 2 & 3; Special

  • 24

    Protection of Children Against Abuse,

    Exploitation and Discrimination Act (R.A.

    No. 7610), as amended by the Special

    Protection of Children Act (R.A. No. 7658)

    21.2.1 Minors under the

    Constitution

    CONST, Art. II, Sec. 13

    21.2.2 Coverage Omnibus Rules, Book III, Rule XII, Sec. 1

    21.2.3 Working children LABOR CODE, Art. 139 ; RA 7610, as

    amended, Secs. 12-16; DOLE Memo

    Circular No. 2, s. 1998 Re: Hazardous and

    non-hazardous establishments

    21.2.4 Discrimination LABOR CODE, Art. 140

    21.3 HOUSEHELPERS/ CAREGIVERS R.A. No. 10361; Implementing Rules and

    Regulations of R.A. No. 10361;

    ILO Domestic Workers Convention, 2011

    (No. 189)

    21.4 PROJECT EMPLOYMENT LABOR CODE, Art. 280 1st par.;

    PNOC Energy Development Corp. v. NLRC,

    G.R. No. 169353, April 13, 2007; Aro v. NLRC,

    G.R. No. 174792, March 7, 2012; William

    Construction Corp. v. Trinidad, G.R. No.

    183250, March 12, 2010;

    21.5 CASUAL EMPLOYEES

    LABOR CODE, Art. 280 2nd par.; Omnibus

    Rules, Book VI, Rule 1, Sec. 5 (b)

    21.5.1 Nature of work Dealco Farms, Inc. v. NLRC, G.R. No.

    153192, January 30, 2009

    21.5.2 One year service Kimberly-Clark (Phils.), Inc. v. Secretary

    of Labor,G.R. No. 156668, November 23,

    2007

    21.6 FIXED-TERM EMPLOYEES Brent School v. Zamora, G.R. Mo. L-48494,

    February 5, 1990; Price v. Innodata Phil.,

    Inc., G.R. No. 178505, September 30, 2008

    21.7 SEASONAL EMPLOYEES Cebu Metal Corp. v. Saliling, G.R. No.

    154463, September 5, 2006; Hacienda

    Bino v. Cuenca, 456 SCRA 300 (2005)

  • 25

    21.8 PROBATIONARY EMPLOYEES LABOR CODE, Art. 281; 61, 2nd sentence;

    Omnibus Rules, Book VI, Rule I, Sec. 6;

    LABOR CODE, Art. 75 (d)

    21.8.1 Definition/purpose Woodridge School v. Pe Benito, G.R. No.

    160240, October 29, 2008; Cebu Marine

    Beach Resort v. NLRC, G.R. No. 143252,

    Oct. 23, 2003

    21.8.2 Duration:

    rule/exception

    A Prime Security Services, Inc. v. NLRC,

    322 SCRA 283 (2000); Canadian

    Opportunities Unlimited, Inc. v. Dalangin,

    G.R. No. 172223, February 6, 2012

    21.8.3 Extension of contract Phil. Federation etc. v. NLRC, G.R. No.

    121071, December 11, 1998

    21.8.4 Standards - not

    determined

    Davao Contractors Development

    Cooperative v. Pasawa, G.R. No. 172174,

    July 9, 2009

    21.8.5 Private school

    teachers -- rule

    Lacuesta v. Ateneo de Manila

    University, 477 SCRA 217 (2005); Aklan

    College, Inc. v. Guarino, G.R. No. 152949,

    August 14, 2007

    Part V

    Termination of Employment

    22 General Concepts

    22.1 Coverage LABOR CODE, Art. 278

    22.2 Security of tenure LABOR CODE, Art. 279;

    22.2.1 Nature of

    right/rationale

    Llosa Tan v. Silahis International Hotel,

    181 SCRA 738 (1990); City Services Corp.

    Workers v. City Services Corp., 135 SCRA

    564 (1985)

    22.2.2 Coverage Inter Orient Maritime Enterprises, Inc. v.

    NLRC, 235 SCRA 268 (1994); Woodridge

    School v. Pe Benito, G.R. No. 160240,

    October 29, 2008

    22.2.3 Requisites of valid

    termination

    Ting v. CA, G.R. No, 146174, July 12, 2006

  • 26

    22.2.4 Measure of penalty Bago v. NLRC, G.R. No. 170001, April 4,

    2007; Sagales v. Rustans Commercial

    Corp., G.R. No. 166554, November 27,

    2008.; Negros Slashers, Inc. v. Teng, G.R.

    No. 187122, February 22, 2012

    23 Termination of employment By

    employee

    23.1 Resignation Virgen Shipping Corp. v. Barraquio, G.R.

    No. 178127, April 16, 2009; Casa Cebuana

    Incorporada v. Leuterio, G.R. No.

    176040, September 4, 2009; Mora v.

    Avesco Marketing Corp., G.R. No.

    177414, November 14, 2008

    23.1.1 Just causes LABOR CODE, Art. 285 (b)

    23.1.2 Without just cause LABOR CODE, Art. 285 (a)

    23.2 Performance of military or

    civic duty

    LABOR CODE, Art. 286; Omnibus Rules,

    Book VI, Rule I, Sec. 12

    24 Termination of employment by

    employer

    24.1 Substantive requirements - just

    causes

    LABOR CODE, Art. 282; 279; 277 (b)

    24.1.1 Basis - management

    prerogative

    Ocean East Agency Corp. v. NLRC, 287

    SCRA 546 (1998)

    24.1.2 Serious

    misconduct/willful

    disobedience

    (insubordination)

    LABOR CODE, Art. 282 (a);

    Yabut v. MERALCO, G.R. No. 190436,

    January 16, 2012;

    First Dominion Resources Corp. v.

    Penaranda, 480 SCRA 504 (2006);

    Bascon v. CA, 422 SCRA 122 (2004);

    Lores Realty Enterprises, Inc., v. Virginia

    E. Pacia, G.R. No. 171189, March 9,

    2011.

    24.1.3 Gross and habitual

    neglect of duties

    LABOR CODE, Art. 282 (b);

    Talidano v. Falcon Maritime and Allied

  • 27

    Services, Inc., G.R. No. 172031, July 14,

    2008; School fo the Holy Spirit of Quezon

    City v. Taguiam, G.R. No. 165565, July 14,

    2008; Eastern Overseas Employment

    Center, Inc. v. Bea, 476 SCRA 384 (2005)

    24.1.4 Loss of trust and

    confidence

    LABOR CODE, Art. 282 (c);

    James Ben L. Jerusalem v. Keppel

    Monte Bank, et al.,G.R. No. 169564. April 6,

    2011; Salas v. Aboitiz One, Inc., G.R. No.

    178236, June 27, 2008; Eats-cetera Food

    Services Outlet v. Letran, G.R. 179507,

    October 2, 2009

    24.1.5 Commission of crime LABOR CODE, Art. 282 (d)

    24.1.6 Analogous causes LABOR CODE, Art. 282 (e);

    Heavylift Manila, Inc. v. CA, 473 SCRA

    541 (2005); John Hancock Life Insurance

    Corp. v. Davis, G.R. 169549, September 3,

    2008; Yrasuegui v. PAL, G.R. No. 168081,

    October 17, 2008

    24.1.7 Others

    24.1.7.1

    Abandonment

    Harpoon Marine Services, Inc. v.

    Francisco, GR No. 167751, March 2, 2011.

    24.1.7.2 Courtesy

    resignation

    Batongbacal v. Associated Bank, 168

    SCRA 600 (1988)

    24.1.7.3 Change of

    ownership

    Manlimos v. NLRC, 242 SCRA 145 (1995)

    24.1.7.4 Habitual

    absenteeism

    Quiambao v. Manila Electric Co., G.R.

    No. 171023, December 18, 2009

    24.1.7.5 Fixed-term

    employment

    Medenilla v. PVB, G.R. No. 127673; March

    13, 2000; Pamantasan v. Civil Service

    Commission, 241 SCRA 506 (1995)

    24.1.7.6 Past offenses McDonald's (Katipunan Branch) v.

    Alba, G.R. 156382, December 18, 2008

    24.1.7.7 Immorality

  • 28

    24.1.7.8 Conviction of

    crime

    Sampaguita Garments Corp. v. NLRC,

    233 SCRA 260 (1994)

    24.1.8 Constructive dismissal Gilles v. CA, G.R. No. 149273, June 5, 2009.

    Chiang Kai Shek College v. CA, 437

    SCRA 171 (2004). La Rosa v. Ambassador

    Hotel, G.R. No. 177059, March 13, 2009

    24.1.9 Transfer Aguanza v. Asian Terminal Inc., G.R. No.

    163505, August 14, 2009; Herida v. F&C

    Pawnshop and Jewelry Store, G.R. No.

    172601, April 16, 2009; PLDT v. Paguio, 472

    SCRA 453 (2005)

    24.1.10 Promotion Phil. Telegraph v. CA, G.R. No. 152057,

    Sept. 29, 2003

    24.1.11 Preventive

    suspension

    Old Omnibus Rules, Book V, Rule XXIV, Secs.

    3 & 4;

    Philippine Airlines Inc. v. NLRC, 292 SCRA

    40 (1998)

    24.1.12 Residency training Felix v. Buenaseda, 240 SCRA 139 (1995)

    24.2 Substantive requirements -

    business related causes

    LABOR CODE, Art. 283

    24.3 Basis - employer right Edge Apparel Inc. v. NLRC, 286 SCRA 302

    (1998); Elleccion v. NLRC, G.R. No. 184735,

    September 17, 2009

    24.4 Business-related or authorized

    causes:

    24.4.1 Installation of labor-

    saving devices

    LABOR CODE, Art. 283

    24.4.2 Retrenchment to

    prevent losses

    LABOR CODE, Art. 283

    Flight Attendants & Stewards

    Association of the Philippines v. PAL,

    G.R. No. 178083, July 22, 2008; Emcor, Inc.

    v. Sienes, G.R. No. 152101, September 8,

    2009; Metro Construction Inc. v. Aman,

    G.R. No. 168324, October 12, 2009

    24.4.3 Redundancy LABOR CODE, Art. 283;

  • 29

    Lowe Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 164813, August

    14, 2009; AMA v. Garcia, G.R. No. 166703,

    April 14, 2008

    24.4.4 Closure of business LABOR CODE, Art. 283;

    Eastridge Golf Club Inc. v. Eastridge

    Golf Club Inc. Labor Union, G.R. No.

    166760, August 22, 2008; Elcee Farms, Inc.

    v. NLRC, G.R. No. 126428, January 25, 2007

    24.4.5 Temporary closure LABOR CODE, Art. 286;

    Valdez v. NLRC, 286 SCRA 87 (1998);

    Eagle Star Security Services, Inc. v.

    Mirando, G.R. No. 179512, July 30, 2009

    24.5 Disease LABOR CODE, Art. 284;

    Duterte v. Kingswood Trading Co., G.R.

    No. 160325, October 4, 2007; Crayon

    Processing v. Pula, G.R. No. 167727, July

    30, 2007

    25 Procedural requirements LABOR CODE, Art. 277 (b);

    Omnibus Rules, Book VI, Rule I, Secs. 1, 2 &

    3

    25.1 In general Phil. Movie Pictures Workers' Assciation

    v. Premiere Productions, Inc., 92 Phil. 843

    (1953);

    Agabon v. NLRC, 442 SCRA 573 (2004);

    King of Kings Transport, Inc. v. Mamac,

    G.R. No. 166208, June 29, 2007

    25.2 Right to counsel Salaw v. NLRC, 202 SCRA 7 (1991)

    25.3 Notice Casa Cebuana Incorporada v.

    Leuterio, G.R. No. 176040, September 4,

    2009

    25.4 Hearing Perez v. Philippine Telegraph and

    Telephone Co., G.R. No. 152048, April 7,

    2009; Suico. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 146762,

    January 30, 2007

    25.5 Decision - award Dela Cruz v. Maerks Filipinas Crewing,

    Inc., G.R. No. 172038, April 14, 2008

  • 30

    25.6 Burden of proof Macasero v. Southern Industrial Gases

    Phil., G.R. No. 178524, January 30, 2009;

    Gallego v. Bayer Phil., Inc., G.R. No.

    179807, July 31, 2009

    25.7 Degree of proof Mitsubishi Motors Phils. Corp. v. Simon,

    G.R. No. 164081, April 16, 2008; Rentokil

    (Initial) Phil., Inc. v. Sanchez, G.R. No.

    176219, December 23, 2008.

    25.8 Prescription Callanta v. Carnation Phil., Inc., 145 Scra

    268 (1986)

    26 Reliefs/remedies in illegal dismissal LABOR CODE, Arts. 279 & 223

    26.1 Reinstatement

    26.1.1 Definition Pheschem Industrial Corp. v. Moldez,

    458 SCRA 339 (2005); Citytrust Banking

    Corp. v. NLRC, G.R. No. 104860; July 11,

    1996

    26.1.2 Reinstatement

    pending appeal Pfizer, Inc., et al. v. Velasco, G.R. No.

    177467, March 9, 2011.

    26.1.3 Exceptions

    26.1.3.1 Closure of

    business Philippine Engineering Corp. v. CIR, 41

    SCRA 102 (1971)

    26.1.3.2 Prayer is for

    separation pay in lieu

    of reinstatement

    Citytrucking, Inc. v. Balajadia, G.R. No.

    160769, August 9, 2006; Pheschem

    Industrial Corp. v. Moldez, 458 SCRA 339

    (2005)

    26.1.3.3 Economic

    business conditions Electruck Asia, Inc. v. Meris, 435 SCRA

    310 (2004; Union Supervisors etc. v. Sec.

    Of Labor 128 SCRA 442 (1984)

    26.1.3.4 Employees'

    unsuitability Divine Word High School v. NLRC, 143

    SCRA 346 (1986)

    26.1.3.5 Employees

    retirement/overage Citytrust Banking Corp. v. NLRC, G.R. No.

    104860; July 11, 1996

    26.1.3.6 Strained

    relations Acesite Corp. v. NLRC, 449 SCRA 360

    (2005); Pentagon Steel Corp. v. CA,

    G.R. No. 174141, June 26, 2009.; Cabigting

  • 31

    v. San Miguel Foods Inc.,G.R. No. 167706,

    November 5, 2009

    26.1.3.7 Not Feasible Goma v. Pamplona Plantation, Inc.,

    G.R. No. 160905, July 4, 2008

    26.1.3. 8 Offer to

    reinstate

    Ranara v. NLRC, 212 SCRA 631 (1992)

    26.2 Backwages

    26.2.1Effect of failure to

    order

    Asian Terminals, Inc. v. NLRC, G.R. No.

    158458, December 19, 2007.

    26.2.2 Computation Triad Security and Allied Services, Inc. v.

    Ortega, Jr., 481 SCRA 591 (2006);

    Philippine Journalists, Inc. v. Mosqueda,

    429 SCRA 369 (2004); PLDT v. Paguio 472

    SCRA 453 (2005); Torres v. Rural Bank of San

    Juan, Inc., G.R. No. 184520, March 13, 2013.

    26.3 Damages and attorneys fees M + W Zander Phil., Inc. v. Enriquez, G.R.

    No. 169173, June 5, 2009.

    26.4 Separation pay Siemens Phil., Inc. v. Domingo, G.R. No.

    150488, July 28, 2008; Nissan North EDSA

    Balintawak v. Serrano, G.R. No. 162538,

    June 4, 2009.

    26.4.1 Computation/

    rationale

    Businessday Information Systems and

    Services, Inc. v. NLRC, 221 SCRA 9 (1993;

    PLDT v. NLRC, 164 SCRA (1988); Songco v.

    NLRC, 183 SCRA 610 (1990);

    26.4.2 Effect of receipt Amkor Technology Phil., Inc. v.

    Juangco, G.R. No. 166507, September 27,

    2006

    26.5 Interest Nacar v. Gallery Frames, G.R. No. 189871,

    August 13, 2013.

    26.6 Financial assistance

    26.5.1 When allowed/not

    allowed

    Luna v. Allado Construction Company,

    Inc., G.R. No. 175251,May 30, 2011;

    Apacible v. Multimed Industries, et

    al.,G.R. No. 178903,May 30, 2011 ; Bristol

    Myers Squibb v. Baban, G.R. 167449,

  • 32

    December 17, 2008; Phil. Long Distance

    Tel. Co. v. NLRC, 164 SCRA 671 (1988).

    26.7 Indemnity Arms Taxi v. NLRC, 219 SCRA 306 (1993)

    26.8 Solidary liabilty of corporate

    officers Harpoon Marine Services, Inc. v.

    Francisco, GR No. 167751, March 2, 2011.

    27 Retirement LABOR CODE, Art. 287; Retirement Pay Law

    (RA No. 7641); Implementing Rules;

    Labor Advisory on Retirement Pay (Oct.

    1999);

    Oxales v. Unilab, G.R. No. 152991, July 21,

    2008; Quevedo v. Benguet Electric

    Cooperative, Inc., G.R. No. 168927,

    September 11, 2009


Recommended