Date post: | 04-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | suryakant-shrotriya |
View: | 12 times |
Download: | 4 times |
OVERVIEW OF CURRENT INDIAN SITUATION
1. Introduction
1.1. The Constitution of India (“Constitution”) provides the jural basis for laws
regulating employment and labour in India (which are collectively also referred to
as „industrial laws‟ or „labour laws‟). The fundamental rights enshrined in the
Constitution provide inter alia for equality before the law and for prohibition of
discrimination on the basis of religion, caste, sex, etc. Similarly, the „Directive
Principles of State Policy‟ laid down in Part IV of the Constitution adjure the State
to inter alia ensure that all citizens have an adequate means of livelihood, right to
education, and just and humane conditions of work, and to further ensure
participation of workers in the management of industries.
1.2. The Constitution hence places emphasis on the concept of social justice as one
of the fundamental objects of State policy, and these protective provisions edify the
spirit of Indian industrial laws.
1.3. Labour welfare1, „trade union; industrial and labour disputes‟2 and factories3
are items found in the Concurrent List of the Constitution. This means that subject
to certain conditions, both the Parliament of India as well as the individual State
legislatures have the power to enact laws on these matters.
Social Security and Labour Welfare in India: A review
Social security is one of the pillars on which the structure of a welfare state rests, and it
constitutes the hard core of social policy in most countries. It is through social security
measures that the state attempts to maintain every citizen at a certain prescribed level
below which no one is allowed to fall. It is the security that society furnishes through
appropriate organization, against certain risks to which its members are exposed (ILO,
1942). Social security system comprises health and unemployment insurance, family
allowances, provident funds, pensions and gratuity schemes, and widows’ and
survivors’ allowances. The essential characteristics of social insurance schemes include
their compulsory and contributory nature; the members must first subscribe to a fund
from which benefits could be drawn later. On the other hand, social assistance is a
method according to which benefits are given to the needy persons, fulfilling the
prescribed conditions, by the government out of its own resources.
The present section reviews labour welfare activities in India with
particular emphasis on the unorganized sector. Although provisions for workmen’s
compensation in case of industrial accidents and maternity benefits for women
workforce had existed for long, a major breakthrough in the field of social security
came only after independence. The Constitution of India (Article 41) laid down that the
State shall make effective provision for securing the right to public assistance in case of
unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement and in other cases of underserved
want. The Government took several steps in compliance of the constitutional
requirements. The Workmen’s Compensation Act (1926) was suitably revised and
social insurance programmes were developed for industrial workers. Provident funds
and gratuity schemes were introduced in most industries, and maternity legislation was
overhauled. Subsequently, State governments instituted their own social assistance
programmes. The provisions for old age comprise pension, provident fund, and gratuity
schemes. All the three provisions are different forms of retirement benefits. Gratuity is a
lump sum payment made to a worker or to his/her heirs by the company on termination
of his/her service due to retirement, invalidity, retrenchment or death (Vajpayee and
Shanker, 1950).
Welfare
Welfare is the provision and maintenance of the conditions of life for individuals
by the community.
Welfare has a positive and negative aspect. Negative welfare is the provision by the
state or other institutions of a “safety net” or the distribution of benefits according
to some criteria; so-called positive welfare is the provision of opportunities for
people to “help themselves”. This contrast lies behind foreign-aid strategies which
concentrate on providing skills or “seed capital” rather than food parcels, for
example. The concept of positive and negative welfare is related to the concepts of
positive and negative freedom.
Marxists support both positive and negative welfare, but recognise that the market
inevitably generates inequality and a class of people inevitably the recipients of
welfare, who have nothing to sell but their labour power, alongside a class of
people who live off the proceeds of exploitation, invariably the providers of
welfare. Only by bringing the means of production under thorough going
proletarian democracy can the very need for welfare be abolished.
Concept of labour welfare
The concept of labour welfare is flexible and elastic and differs widely with
time, region, industry, social values and customs, degree of industrialization, the
general socio-economic development of the people and the political ideologies
prevailing at a particular time. It is also moulded according to the age-groups,
socio-cultural background, marital and economic status and educational level of
the workers in various industries
In its broad connotation, the term welfare refers to a state of living of an
individual or group in a desirable relationship with total environment – ecological,
economic, and social. Conceptually as well as operationally, labour welfare is a
part of social welfare which, in turn, is closely linked to the concept and the role of
the State. The concept of social welfare, in its narrow contours, has been equated
with economic welfare. As these goals are not always be realised by individuals
through their efforts alone, the government came into the picture and gradually
began to take over the responsibility for the free and full development of human
personality of its population.
Labour welfare is an extension of the term Welfare and its application
to labour. During the industrialisation process, the stress on labour productivity
increased; and brought about changes in the thinking on labour welfare. An early
study under the UN observed as follows “in our opinion most underdeveloped
countries are in the situation that investment in people is likely to prove as
productive, in the purely material sense, as any investment in material resources
and in many cases, investment in people would lead to a greater increase of the
flow of goods and services than would follow upon any comparable investment in
material capital” (UN, 1951). The theory that welfare expenditure, especially
expenditure on health and education, is productive investment has led to the view
that workers could work more productively if they were given a fair deal both at
the work place and in the community.
The concept of labour welfare has received inspiration from the
concepts of democracy and welfare state. Democracy does not simply denote a
form of government; it is rather a way of life based on certain values such as equal
rights and privileges for all. The operation of welfare services, in actual practice,
brings to bear on it different reflections representing the broad cultural and social
conditions. In short, labour welfare is the voluntary efforts of the employers to
establish, within the existing industrial system, working and sometimes living and
cultural conditions of the employees beyond what is required by law, the custom of
the industry and the conditions of the market (A. J. Todd, 1933).
The constituents of labour welfare included working hours, working
conditions, safety, industrial health insurance, workmen’s compensation, provident
funds, gratuity, pensions, protection against indebtedness, industrial housing, rest
rooms, canteens, crèches, wash places, toilet facilities, lunches, cinemas, theatres,
music, reading rooms, holiday rooms, workers’ education, co-operative stores,
excursions, playgrounds, and scholarships and other help for education of
employees’ children.
However, labour welfare has both positive and negative sides
associated to it. On the positive side, it deals with the provision of opportunities
which enable the worker and his family to lead a good life, socially and personally,
as well as help him to adjust social transition in his work life, family life and social
life. On the negative side it functions in order to nutralise the baneful effects of
large scale industrialization and provide a
counterbalance to the undesirable social consequences and labour problems which
have evolved in the process of this transition.
The word labour means any productive activity. In a broader sense,
therefore, the phrase labour welfare means the adoption of measures to promote the
physical, social, psychological and general well-being of the working population.
Welfare work in any industry aims, or should aim, at improving the working and
living conditions of workers and their families.
Definitions:
Labour welfare has been defined in various ways, though unfortunately no
single definition has found universal acceptance. The Oxford Dictionary defines
labour welfare as “efforts to make life worth living for worker”
Chamber’s Dictionary defines welfare as “a state of faring or doing
well; freedom from calamity, enjoyment of health, prosperity.”
The ILO report refers to labour welfare as “such services, facilities, and
amenities, which may be established in, or in the vicinity of undertakings to
enable persons employed therein to perform their work in healthy and congenial
surroundings and provided with amenities conducive to good health and high
morale”.
Features:
On the basis of the various definitions, the basic characteristics of labour
welfare work may be noted thus:
1. It is the work which is usually undertaken within the premises or in the vicinity
of the undertakings for the benefit of the benefit of the employees and the members
of their families.
2. The work generally includes those items of welfare which are over and above
what the employees expect as a result of the contract of service from the
employers.
3. The purpose of providing welfare amenities is to bring about development of the
whole personality of the worker -his social, psychological, economic, moral,
cultural and intellectual development to make him a good worker, a good citizen
and a good member of the family.
4. These facilities may be provided voluntarily by progressive and enlightened
entrepreneurs at their own accord out of their realization of social responsibility
towards labour, or statutory provisions may compel them to make these facilities
available; or these may be undertaken by the government or trade unions, if they
have the necessary funds for the purpose.
5. Labour welfare is a very broad term, covering social security and such other
activities as medical aid, crèches, canteens, recreation, housing, adult education,
arrangements for the transport of labour to and from the work place.
6. It may be noted that not only intra-mural but also extra-mural, statutory as well
as non-statutory activities, undertaken by any of the three agencies- the employers,
trade unions or the government- for the physical and mental development of the
worker, both as a compensation for wear and tear that he undergoes as a part of the
production process and also to enable him to sustain and improve upon the basic
capacity of contribution to the processes of production, “which are all the species
of the longer family encompassed by the term ‘labour welfare’.
Concept of labour welfare
In its broad connotation, the term welfare refers to a state of living of an individual
or group in a desirable relationship with total environment – ecological, economic,
and social.
Conceptually as well as operationally, labour welfare is a part of social welfare
which, in turn, is closely linked to the concept and the role of the State. The
concept of social welfare, in its narrow contours, has been equated with economic
welfare. Pigou defined it as “that part of general welfare which can be brought
directly or indirectly into relations with the measuring rod of money” (Pigou,
1962). According to
Willensky and Labeaux, social welfare alludes to “those formally organised and
socially sponsored institutions, agencies and programmes which function to
maintain or improve the economic conditions, health or interpersonal
competence of some parts or all of a population” (Willensky and Labeaux,
1918). As these goals may not always be realised by individuals through their
efforts alone, the government came into the picture and gradually began to take
over the responsibility for the free and full development of human personality of its
population.
Labour welfare is an extension of the term Welfare and its application
to labour. During the industrialisation process, the stress on labour productivity
increased; and brought about changes in the thinking on labour welfare. An early
study under the UN observed as follows “in our opinion most underdeveloped
countries are in the situation that investment in people is likely to prove as
productive, in the purely material sense, as any investment in material resources
and in many cases, investment in people would lead to a greater increase of the
flow of goods and services than would follow upon any comparable investment in
material capital” (UN, 1951). The theory that welfare expenditure, especially
expenditure on health and education, is productive investment has led to the view
that workers could work more productively if they were given a fair deal both at
the work place and in the community.
The concept of labour welfare has received inspiration from the
concepts of democracy and welfare state. Democracy does not simply denote a
form of government; it is rather a way of life based on certain values such as equal
rights and privileges for all. The operation of welfare services, in actual practice,
brings to bear on it different reflections representing the broad cultural and social
conditions. In short, labour welfare is the voluntary efforts of the employers to
establish, within the existing industrial system, working and sometimes living and
cultural conditions of the employees beyond what is required by law, the custom of
the industry and the conditions of the market (A. J. Todd, 1933).
The constituents of labour welfare included working hours, working
conditions, safety, industrial health insurance, workmen’s compensation, provident
funds, gratuity, pensions, protection against indebtedness, industrial housing, rest
rooms, canteens, crèches, wash places, toilet facilities, lunches, cinemas, theatres,
music, reading rooms, holiday rooms, workers’ education, co-operative stores,
excursions, playgrounds, and scholarships and other help for education of
employees’ children.
Labour and Labour Welfare
Labour sector addresses multidimensional socio-economic aspects affecting labour
welfare, productivity, raising living standard of labour force and social security. To
raise earnings of work force and achieve higher productivity, skill upgradation
through suitable training is of utmost importance. Manpower development to
provide adequate labour force of appropriate skills and quality to different sectors
essential for rapid socio-economic development and elimination of the mismatch
between skills required and skills available has been a major focus of human
resource development activities during the last fifty years. Employment generation
in all the productive sectors is one of the basic objectives. In this context,
providing enabling environment for self employment has received special attention
both in urban and rural areas. Objective is also to eliminate bonded labour,
employment of children and women in hazardous industries, and minimize
occupational health hazards. During the Ninth Plan period, elimination of such
undesirable practices as child labour, bonded labour, ensuring workers’ safety and
social security, looking after labour welfare and providing of the necessary support
measures for sorting out problem relating to employment of both men and women
workers in different sectors will receive priority attention. It is also envisaged that
the employment exchanges will be reoriented so that they become the source of
labour related information, employment opportunities and provide counseling and
guidance to employment seekers.
All labour welfare measures have the following objectives:
1. Enabling workers to live richer and more satisfactory lives;
2. Contributing to the productivity of labour and efficiency of the enterprise;
3. Enhancing the standard of living of workers by indirectly reducing the burden
on their purse;
4. Enabling workers to live in tune and harmony with services for workers
obtaining in the neighbourhood community where similar enterprises are situated;
5. Based on an intelligent prediction of the future needs of the industrial workers,
designing policies to cushion off and absorb the shocks of industrialisation and
urbanisation to workers;
6. Fostering administratively viable and essentially developmental outlook among
the workforce; and
7. Discharging social responsibilities.
Principles of labour welfare
Certain fundamental considerations are involved in the concept of labour welfare.
The following are the more important among them.
Social responsibility of industry
This principle is based on the social conception of industry and its role in the
society that is, the understanding that social responsibility of the state is manifested
through industry. It is assumed that labour welfare is an expression of industry’s
duty towards its employees.
Social responsibility means that the obligation of the industry to pursue those
policies, to take such decisions, and to follow those lines of action which are
desirable in terms of the objectives and values currently obtaining in the society.
The values of the Indian community are enshrined in the constitution of the
country. Labour welfare is not embroidery on capitalism nor the external dressing
of an exploitative management; rather, it is an expression of the assumption by
industry of its responsibility for its employees (Maurioce Bruce, 1961). Industry is
expected to win the co-operation of the workers, provide them security of
employment, fair wage, and equal opportunity for personal growth and
advancement, and make welfare facilities available to them.
Democratic values
The principle of democratic values of labour welfare concedes that workers may
have certain unmet needs for no fault of their own, that industry has an obligation
to render them help in gratifying those needs, and that workers have a right of
determining the manner in which these needs can be met and of participating in the
administration of the mechanism of need gratification. The underlying assumption
to this approach is that the worker is a mature and rational individual who is
capable of taking decisions for himself/herself.
Adequacy of wages
The third principle of labour welfare is adequacy of wages; it implies that labour
welfare measures are not a substitute for wages. It will be wrong to argue that since
workers are given a variety of labour welfare services, they need be paid only low
wages. Right to adequate wage is beyond dispute.
Efficiency
The fourth principle of labour welfare lays stress on the dictum that to cultivate
welfare is to cultivate efficiency. Even those who deny any social responsibility for
industry do accept that an enterprise must introduce all such labour welfare
measures which promote efficiency (Marshall, 1950). It has been often mentioned
that workers’ education and training, housing, and diet are the three most important
aspects of labour welfare, which always accentuate labour efficiency.
Re-personalization
Since industrial organisation is rigid and impersonal, the goal of welfare in
industry is the enrichment and growth of human personality. The labour welfare
movement seeks to bring cheer, comfort, and warmth in the human relationship by
treating man as an individual, with quiet distinct needs and aspirations. Social and
cultural programmes, recreation and other measures designed after taking into
consideration the workers’ interests go a long way in counteracting the effects of
monotony, boredom, and cheerlessness.
Co-responsibility
The sixth principle of labour welfare recognises that the responsibility for labour
welfare lies on both employers and workers and not on employers alone
(Moorthy, 1958). Labour welfare measures are likely to be of little success unless
mutuality of interest and responsibilities are accepted and understood by both the
parties, in particular the quality of responsibility at the attitudinal and
organisational level.
Totality of welfare
The final principle of labour welfare is that the concept of labour welfare must
permeate throughout the hierarchy of an organisation, and accepted by all levels of
functionaries in the enterprise.
Approaches
The issue of labour welfare may be studied from different angles, such as:
The location, where these amenities are provided, within and outside the
industrial undertakings;
The nature of amenities such as those concerned conditions of employment
and
The welfare activities termed as ‘statutory’, ‘voluntary’ and ‘mutual’.
The agencies which provide living conditions of work people; these
amenities.
On the basis of location of welfare activities, labour welfare work has been
classified by Broughton in two specific categories, namely,
(a)intramural(b)extra-mural
(a)Intra-mural activities: consist of such welfare schemes provided within the
factories as medical facilities, provision of crèches, and canteens, supply of
drinking water, washing and bathing facilities, provision of safety measures such
as fencing and covering of machines, good lay-out of machinery and plant,
sufficient lighting, first-aid appliances; activities relating to improving conditions
of employment, recruitment and discipline and provision of provident fund and
gratuity, maternity benefits,etc.
(b)Extra-mural activities: cover the services and facilities provided outside the
factory such as, housing accommodation, indoor and outdoor recreation facilities,
amusement and sports, educational facilities for adults and children, provision of
libraries and reading rooms.
In the welfare activities concerned with conditions of employment are
included activities for the management of problems arising out of hours of work,
wages, holidays with pay, rest intervals, sanitation, continuity of employment,
control over the recruitment of female and juvenile labour, while all such schemes
of benefits as co-operative societies, legal and medical aid, and housing are
included in the category of activities concerned with conditions of workers.
Labour welfare work may be statutory, voluntary or mutual. It is
statutory when such activities have to be undertaken in furtherance of the
legislation adopted by the government. It is voluntary when the activities are
undertaken at their own accord by the employers or some philanthropic bodies or
when a labour organisation undertakes such activities for the welfare of their
members. It is mutual, when all parties join hands to bring about the social and
economic uplift of the workers.
The National Commission on labour has classified various labour welfare
measures under two distinct classes:
(1)those which have to be provided, irrespective of the size of the establishment or
the number of the persons employed therein such as facilities relating to washing,
storing, drying the clothing, first-aid, drinking water, latrines and urinals
(2)those which are to be provided subject to the employment of a specified number
of persons, such as canteen, rest shelter, crèche, ambulance,etc.
According to the Encyclopedia of social sciences, “industrial welfare work
”has taken numerous forms such as:
(a)those dealing with immediate working conditions are special provisions for
adequate light, heat, ventilation, toilet facilities, accident and occupational disease
prevention, lunch room, rest room, maximum hours, minimum wages,etc.;
(b)those concerned with less immediate working conditions and group interests,
are gymnasiums ,club rooms, play grounds, gardens, dancing, music, house organs,
mutual aid societies, vacation with pay, profit-sharing, stockownership, disability
and unemployment funds, pensions, savings banks, provisions for conciliation and
arbitration, shop committees and workers councils;
(c)those designed to improve community conditions, such as housing, retail stores,
schools, libraries, kinder gardens, lectures on Social Security and Labour
Welfare in India: A review
Social security is one of the pillars on which the structure of a welfare state rests, and it
constitutes the hard core of social policy in most countries. It is through social security
measures that the state attempts to maintain every citizen at a certain prescribed level
below which no one is allowed to fall. It is the security that society furnishes through
appropriate organization, against certain risks to which its members are exposed (ILO,
1942). Social security system comprises health and unemployment insurance, family
allowances, provident funds, pensions and gratuity schemes, and widows’ and
survivors’ allowances. The essential characteristics of social insurance schemes include
their compulsory and contributory nature; the members must first subscribe to a fund
from which benefits could be drawn later. On the other hand, social assistance is a
method according to which benefits are given to the needy persons, fulfilling the
prescribed conditions, by the government out of its own resources.
The present section reviews labour welfare activities in India with
particular emphasis on the unorganized sector. Although provisions for workmen’s
compensation in case of industrial accidents and maternity benefits for women
workforce had existed for long, a major breakthrough in the field of social security
came only after independence. The Constitution of India (Article 41) laid down that the
State shall make effective provision for securing the right to public assistance in case of
unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement and in other cases of underserved
want. The Government took several steps in compliance of the constitutional
requirements. The Workmen’s Compensation Act (1926) was suitably revised and
social insurance programmes were developed for industrial workers. Provident funds
and gratuity schemes were introduced in most industries, and maternity legislation was
overhauled. Subsequently, State governments instituted their own social assistance
programmes. The provisions for old age comprise pension, provident fund, and gratuity
schemes. All the three provisions are different forms of retirement benefits. Gratuity is a
lump sum payment made to a worker or to his/her heirs by the company on termination
of his/her service due to retirement, invalidity, retrenchment or death (Vajpayee and
Shanker, 1950).
Welfare
Welfare is the provision and maintenance of the conditions of life for individuals
by the community.
Welfare has a positive and negative aspect. Negative welfare is the provision by the
state or other institutions of a “safety net” or the distribution of benefits according
to some criteria; so-called positive welfare is the provision of opportunities for
people to “help themselves”. This contrast lies behind foreign-aid strategies which
concentrate on providing skills or “seed capital” rather than food parcels, for
example. The concept of positive and negative welfare is related to the concepts of
positive and negative freedom.
Marxists support both positive and negative welfare, but recognise that the market
inevitably generates inequality and a class of people inevitably the recipients of
welfare, who have nothing to sell but their labour power, alongside a class of
people who live off the proceeds of exploitation, invariably the providers of
welfare. Only by bringing the means of production under thorough going
proletarian democracy can the very need for welfare be abolished.
Concept of labour welfare
The concept of labour welfare is flexible and elastic and differs widely with
time, region, industry, social values and customs, degree of industrialization, the
general socio-economic development of the people and the political ideologies
prevailing at a particular time. It is also moulded according to the age-groups,
socio-cultural background, marital and economic status and educational level of
the workers in various industries
In its broad connotation, the term welfare refers to a state of living of an
individual or group in a desirable relationship with total environment – ecological,
economic, and social. Conceptually as well as operationally, labour welfare is a
part of social welfare which, in turn, is closely linked to the concept and the role of
the State. The concept of social welfare, in its narrow contours, has been equated
with economic welfare. As these goals are not always be realised by individuals
through their efforts alone, the government came into the picture and gradually
began to take over the responsibility for the free and full development of human
personality of its population.
Labour welfare is an extension of the term Welfare and its application
to labour. During the industrialisation process, the stress on labour productivity
increased; and brought about changes in the thinking on labour welfare. An early
study under the UN observed as follows “in our opinion most underdeveloped
countries are in the situation that investment in people is likely to prove as
productive, in the purely material sense, as any investment in material resources
and in many cases, investment in people would lead to a greater increase of the
flow of goods and services than would follow upon any comparable investment in
material capital” (UN, 1951). The theory that welfare expenditure, especially
expenditure on health and education, is productive investment has led to the view
that workers could work more productively if they were given a fair deal both at
the work place and in the community.
The concept of labour welfare has received inspiration from the
concepts of democracy and welfare state. Democracy does not simply denote a
form of government; it is rather a way of life based on certain values such as equal
rights and privileges for all. The operation of welfare services, in actual practice,
brings to bear on it different reflections representing the broad cultural and social
conditions. In short, labour welfare is the voluntary efforts of the employers to
establish, within the existing industrial system, working and sometimes living and
cultural conditions of the employees beyond what is required by law, the custom of
the industry and the conditions of the market (A. J. Todd, 1933).
The constituents of labour welfare included working hours, working
conditions, safety, industrial health insurance, workmen’s compensation, provident
funds, gratuity, pensions, protection against indebtedness, industrial housing, rest
rooms, canteens, crèches, wash places, toilet facilities, lunches, cinemas, theatres,
music, reading rooms, holiday rooms, workers’ education, co-operative stores,
excursions, playgrounds, and scholarships and other help for education of
employees’ children.
However, labour welfare has both positive and negative sides
associated to it. On the positive side, it deals with the provision of opportunities
which enable the worker and his family to lead a good life, socially and personally,
as well as help him to adjust social transition in his work life, family life and social
life. On the negative side it functions in order to nutralise the baneful effects of
large scale industrialization and provide a
counterbalance to the undesirable social consequences and labour problems which
have evolved in the process of this transition.
The word labour means any productive activity. In a broader sense,
therefore, the phrase labour welfare means the adoption of measures to promote the
physical, social, psychological and general well-being of the working population.
Welfare work in any industry aims, or should aim, at improving the working and
living conditions of workers and their families.
Definitions:
Labour welfare has been defined in various ways, though unfortunately no
single definition has found universal acceptance. The Oxford Dictionary defines
labour welfare as “efforts to make life worth living for worker”
Chamber’s Dictionary defines welfare as “a state of faring or doing
well; freedom from calamity, enjoyment of health, prosperity.”
The ILO report refers to labour welfare as “such services, facilities, and
amenities, which may be established in, or in the vicinity of undertakings to
enable persons employed therein to perform their work in healthy and congenial
surroundings and provided with amenities conducive to good health and high
morale”.
Features:
On the basis of the various definitions, the basic characteristics of labour
welfare work may be noted thus:
1. It is the work which is usually undertaken within the premises or in the vicinity
of the undertakings for the benefit of the benefit of the employees and the members
of their families.
2. The work generally includes those items of welfare which are over and above
what the employees expect as a result of the contract of service from the
employers.
3. The purpose of providing welfare amenities is to bring about development of the
whole personality of the worker -his social, psychological, economic, moral,
cultural and intellectual development to make him a good worker, a good citizen
and a good member of the family.
4. These facilities may be provided voluntarily by progressive and enlightened
entrepreneurs at their own accord out of their realization of social responsibility
towards labour, or statutory provisions may compel them to make these facilities
available; or these may be undertaken by the government or trade unions, if they
have the necessary funds for the purpose.
5. Labour welfare is a very broad term, covering social security and such other
activities as medical aid, crèches, canteens, recreation, housing, adult education,
arrangements for the transport of labour to and from the work place.
6. It may be noted that not only intra-mural but also extra-mural, statutory as well
as non-statutory activities, undertaken by any of the three agencies- the employers,
trade unions or the government- for the physical and mental development of the
worker, both as a compensation for wear and tear that he undergoes as a part of the
production process and also to enable him to sustain and improve upon the basic
capacity of contribution to the processes of production, “which are all the species
of the longer family encompassed by the term ‘labour welfare’.
Concept of labour welfare
In its broad connotation, the term welfare refers to a state of living of an individual
or group in a desirable relationship with total environment – ecological, economic,
and social.
Conceptually as well as operationally, labour welfare is a part of social welfare
which, in turn, is closely linked to the concept and the role of the State. The
concept of social welfare, in its narrow contours, has been equated with economic
welfare. Pigou defined it as “that part of general welfare which can be brought
directly or indirectly into relations with the measuring rod of money” (Pigou,
1962). According to
Willensky and Labeaux, social welfare alludes to “those formally organised and
socially sponsored institutions, agencies and programmes which function to
maintain or improve the economic conditions, health or interpersonal
competence of some parts or all of a population” (Willensky and Labeaux,
1918). As these goals may not always be realised by individuals through their
efforts alone, the government came into the picture and gradually began to take
over the responsibility for the free and full development of human personality of its
population.
Labour welfare is an extension of the term Welfare and its application
to labour. During the industrialisation process, the stress on labour productivity
increased; and brought about changes in the thinking on labour welfare. An early
study under the UN observed as follows “in our opinion most underdeveloped
countries are in the situation that investment in people is likely to prove as
productive, in the purely material sense, as any investment in material resources
and in many cases, investment in people would lead to a greater increase of the
flow of goods and services than would follow upon any comparable investment in
material capital” (UN, 1951). The theory that welfare expenditure, especially
expenditure on health and education, is productive investment has led to the view
that workers could work more productively if they were given a fair deal both at
the work place and in the community.
The concept of labour welfare has received inspiration from the
concepts of democracy and welfare state. Democracy does not simply denote a
form of government; it is rather a way of life based on certain values such as equal
rights and privileges for all. The operation of welfare services, in actual practice,
brings to bear on it different reflections representing the broad cultural and social
conditions. In short, labour welfare is the voluntary efforts of the employers to
establish, within the existing industrial system, working and sometimes living and
cultural conditions of the employees beyond what is required by law, the custom of
the industry and the conditions of the market (A. J. Todd, 1933).
The constituents of labour welfare included working hours, working
conditions, safety, industrial health insurance, workmen’s compensation, provident
funds, gratuity, pensions, protection against indebtedness, industrial housing, rest
rooms, canteens, crèches, wash places, toilet facilities, lunches, cinemas, theatres,
music, reading rooms, holiday rooms, workers’ education, co-operative stores,
excursions, playgrounds, and scholarships and other help for education of
employees’ children.
Labour and Labour Welfare
Labour sector addresses multidimensional socio-economic aspects affecting labour
welfare, productivity, raising living standard of labour force and social security. To
raise earnings of work force and achieve higher productivity, skill upgradation
through suitable training is of utmost importance. Manpower development to
provide adequate labour force of appropriate skills and quality to different sectors
essential for rapid socio-economic development and elimination of the mismatch
between skills required and skills available has been a major focus of human
resource development activities during the last fifty years. Employment generation
in all the productive sectors is one of the basic objectives. In this context,
providing enabling environment for self employment has received special attention
both in urban and rural areas. Objective is also to eliminate bonded labour,
employment of children and women in hazardous industries, and minimize
occupational health hazards. During the Ninth Plan period, elimination of such
undesirable practices as child labour, bonded labour, ensuring workers’ safety and
social security, looking after labour welfare and providing of the necessary support
measures for sorting out problem relating to employment of both men and women
workers in different sectors will receive priority attention. It is also envisaged that
the employment exchanges will be reoriented so that they become the source of
labour related information, employment opportunities and provide counseling and
guidance to employment seekers.
All labour welfare measures have the following objectives:
1. Enabling workers to live richer and more satisfactory lives;
2. Contributing to the productivity of labour and efficiency of the enterprise;
3. Enhancing the standard of living of workers by indirectly reducing the burden
on their purse;
4. Enabling workers to live in tune and harmony with services for workers
obtaining in the neighbourhood community where similar enterprises are situated;
5. Based on an intelligent prediction of the future needs of the industrial workers,
designing policies to cushion off and absorb the shocks of industrialisation and
urbanisation to workers;
6. Fostering administratively viable and essentially developmental outlook among
the workforce; and
7. Discharging social responsibilities.
Principles of labour welfare
Certain fundamental considerations are involved in the concept of labour welfare.
The following are the more important among them.
Social responsibility of industry
This principle is based on the social conception of industry and its role in the
society that is, the understanding that social responsibility of the state is manifested
through industry. It is assumed that labour welfare is an expression of industry’s
duty towards its employees.
Social responsibility means that the obligation of the industry to pursue those
policies, to take such decisions, and to follow those lines of action which are
desirable in terms of the objectives and values currently obtaining in the society.
The values of the Indian community are enshrined in the constitution of the
country. Labour welfare is not embroidery on capitalism nor the external dressing
of an exploitative management; rather, it is an expression of the assumption by
industry of its responsibility for its employees (Maurioce Bruce, 1961). Industry is
expected to win the co-operation of the workers, provide them security of
employment, fair wage, and equal opportunity for personal growth and
advancement, and make welfare facilities available to them.
Democratic values
The principle of democratic values of labour welfare concedes that workers may
have certain unmet needs for no fault of their own, that industry has an obligation
to render them help in gratifying those needs, and that workers have a right of
determining the manner in which these needs can be met and of participating in the
administration of the mechanism of need gratification. The underlying assumption
to this approach is that the worker is a mature and rational individual who is
capable of taking decisions for himself/herself.
Adequacy of wages
The third principle of labour welfare is adequacy of wages; it implies that labour
welfare measures are not a substitute for wages. It will be wrong to argue that since
workers are given a variety of labour welfare services, they need be paid only low
wages. Right to adequate wage is beyond dispute
Efficiency
The fourth principle of labour welfare lays stress on the dictum that to cultivate
welfare is to cultivate efficiency. Even those who deny any social responsibility for
industry do accept that an enterprise must introduce all such labour welfare
measures which promote efficiency (Marshall, 1950). It has been often mentioned
that workers’ education and training, housing, and diet are the three most important
aspects of labour welfare, which always accentuate labour efficiency.
Re-personalization
Since industrial organisation is rigid and impersonal, the goal of welfare in
industry is the enrichment and growth of human personality. The labour welfare
movement seeks to bring cheer, comfort, and warmth in the human relationship by
treating man as an individual, with quiet distinct needs and aspirations. Social and
cultural programmes, recreation and other measures designed after taking into
consideration the workers’ interests go a long way in counteracting the effects of
monotony, boredom, and cheerlessness.
Co-responsibility
The sixth principle of labour welfare recognises that the responsibility for labour
welfare lies on both employers and workers and not on employers alone
(Moorthy, 1958). Labour welfare measures are likely to be of little success unless
mutuality of interest and responsibilities are accepted and understood by both the
parties, in particular the quality of responsibility at the attitudinal and
organisational level.
Totality of welfare
The final principle of labour welfare is that the concept of labour welfare must
permeate throughout the hierarchy of an organisation, and accepted by all levels of
functionaries in the enterprise.
Approaches
The issue of labour welfare may be studied from different angles, such as:
The location, where these amenities are provided, within and outside the
industrial undertakings;
The nature of amenities such as those concerned conditions of employment
and
The welfare activities termed as ‘statutory’, ‘voluntary’ and ‘mutual’.
The agencies which provide living conditions of work people; these
amenities.
On the basis of location of welfare activities, labour welfare work has been
classified by Broughton in two specific categories, namely,
(a)intramural(b)extra-mural
(a)Intra-mural activities: consist of such welfare schemes provided within the
factories as medical facilities, provision of crèches, and canteens, supply of
drinking water, washing and bathing facilities, provision of safety measures such
as fencing and covering of machines, good lay-out of machinery and plant,
sufficient lighting, first-aid appliances; activities relating to improving conditions
of employment, recruitment and discipline and provision of provident fund and
gratuity, maternity benefits,etc.
(b)Extra-mural activities: cover the services and facilities provided outside the
factory such as, housing accommodation, indoor and outdoor recreation facilities,
amusement and sports, educational facilities for adults and children, provision of
libraries and reading rooms.
In the welfare activities concerned with conditions of employment are
included activities for the management of problems arising out of hours of work,
wages, holidays with pay, rest intervals, sanitation, continuity of employment,
control over the recruitment of female and juvenile labour, while all such schemes
of benefits as co-operative societies, legal and medical aid, and housing are
included in the category of activities concerned with conditions of workers.
Labour welfare work may be statutory, voluntary or mutual. It is
statutory when such activities have to be undertaken in furtherance of the
legislation adopted by the government. It is voluntary when the activities are
undertaken at their own accord by the employers or some philanthropic bodies or
when a labour organisation undertakes such activities for the welfare of their
members. It is mutual, when all parties join hands to bring about the social and
economic uplift of the workers.
The National Commission on labour has classified various labour welfare
measures under two distinct classes:
(1)those which have to be provided, irrespective of the size of the establishment or
the number of the persons employed therein such as facilities relating to washing,
storing, drying the clothing, first-aid, drinking water, latrines and urinals
(2)those which are to be provided subject to the employment of a specified number
of persons, such as canteen, rest shelter, crèche, ambulance,etc.
According to the Encyclopedia of social sciences, “industrial welfare work
”has taken numerous forms such as:
(a)those dealing with immediate working conditions are special provisions for
adequate light, heat, ventilation, toilet facilities, accident and occupational disease
prevention, lunch room, rest room, maximum hours, minimum wages,etc.;
(b)those concerned with less immediate working conditions and group interests,
are gymnasiums ,club rooms, play grounds, gardens, dancing, music, house organs,
mutual aid societies, vacation with pay, profit-sharing, stockownership, disability
and unemployment funds, pensions, savings banks, provisions for conciliation and
arbitration, shop committees and workers councils;
(c)those designed to improve community conditions, such as housing, retail stores,
schools, libraries, kinder gardens, lectures on domestic sciences, day nurseries,
dispensary and dental service screening of motion pictures, arranging athletic
contests and picnics and summer camps.
domestic sciences, day nurseries, dispensary and dental service screening of
motion pictures, arranging athletic contests and picnics and summer camps.
Company profile
Established in 1987 Wholly owned 100% export Production Capacity: * Unit I :
4000 pairs a day * Unit II : 3000 pairs a day * (Makes more than 1.5 million pairs
in a year) Current Export Markets: * UK, Italy, Spain, France, Germany, Holland
& Scandinavia Social Strengths: * An equal opportunity employer * Company
with a human face * Hazard free work environment * Abides by the compliance
issues of buyers Technical Strengths: * State of art facility equipped with ultra
modern Italian, German & Indian Machines * Assembly line production facility
with online quality checks * Italian & Spanish designers * R & D focus on design,
finish & durability Primary Competitive Advantage: * Experienced R & D
Department * CAD System Installed * Large Production Capacity * Reliability &
Transparency
Fact Sheet
Year of Establishment : 1987
Nature of Business : Exporter
Major Markets : Indian Subcontinent, East Europe, North Europe and
South/West Europe
Company Name: Gupta H.C. Overseas (I) Pvt. Ltd.
Contact Person: Mr. Gopal Gupta
Telephone: +(91)-(562)-4017900
Mobile / Cell Phone: +(91)-9837065456
Fax No: +(91)-(562)-2600300
Address: Bye-Pass Road, Agra, Uttar Pradesh - 282007 (India)
Products
Ladies High Fashion Footwear (Boots, Shoes & Bags)
Production Capacity
1.8 million pairs in a year
Unit I : 4000 pairs a day Unit II : 4000 pairs a day
Technical Strengths
State of art facility equipped with ultra modern machines
Collections designed by leading Italian & Spanish design houses
R & D focus on authentic designs, finish & sturdiness
In-house permanent Italian technicians
Equipped with lab for Clark Shoes(UK)
Primary Competitive Advantages
Experienced R & D Department (Certified by DSIR, Ministry of Science &
Technology,
Govt. of India - First footwear unit in India to get this certification)
Large Production Capacity
Reliability & Transparen
Social Responsibility
In house training institute in collaboration with IL&FS (supported by Ministry of
Rural Development, Govt. of India). Aimed at providing employment & skills to
people of village settlement and BPL category.
Equipped with 100 KW Solar Power Generating System. Saving appx. 80,000 Kg.
CO2 emissionper year.
International Affiliations
First ISO 9001 shoe company in the region SA 8000
Awards & Accredtions
By Provincial Govt.
State Export Award 1998
By Council of Leather Exports, India
Certificate of Merit 2001
Best Performance Award 2003
Best Design Award 2005
Certificate of Merit :
SA-8000 Social Accountability 2006
By Govt. of India, Ministry of MSME
National Award 2007
(Special Recognition Award)
International Exhibitions
Garda and Micam Fairs
India Franchisee & Licensee of
Miss Sixty Shoes & Accessories, Italy
STENS, France. (Extensible Sole)
www.stens.
History of Labour Law in India
Labour legislations enacted post independence of India have sought to tackle
various problems relating to working conditions, industrial safety, hygiene and
welfare, wages, trade unionism, social security, etc. Laws were also enacted to
meet the special needs of specific industries and commercial establishments, such
as mines, plantations, factories, shops and establishments, etc. With the declaration
of a national emergency in 1975, anti-inflationary laws like Payment of Bonus
(Amendment) Act, 1975, the Equal Remuneration Ordinance, 1975, etc. were
enacted which led to further amelioration of workers in the country.
1 Entry 24, List III, VII Schedule, Constitution.
2 Entry 22, List III, VII Schedule, Constitution.
3 Entry 36, List III, VII Schedule, Constitution.
2.2. In the year 1991, the Indian Government adopted a policy of economic
liberalisation. The resultant enhancement of competition in the fast-changing
markets raised a new set of challenges since Indian labour laws (including the
social security laws) were traditionally inclined to be protective of labour and not
conducive to competition in the labour markets.
2.3. With greater mobility and flexibility in the labour markets becoming the need
of the hour, employers have consistently argued in the last decade or so that the
excessively pro-worker nature of Indian labour laws in the organised sector is a
cause for concern.
2.4. This has caused the Government to consider reforms in labour laws in India.
Recommendations designed to give the labour markets appropriate flexibility for it
to be in a position to compete in the international markets are under consideration.
It can consequently be said that the Indian job / labour market has started moving
away from a „protectionist‟ and closed model towards a more competitive and
open model.
3. Structure of the Indian Labour Market
3.1. The Indian labour market can be broadly divided into three categories: (i)
organised sector; (ii) urban informal (i.e. unorganised) sector; and (iii) rural labour
(i.e. labour engaged mostly in agriculture). Wages in the urban informal (i.e.
unorganised) sector are marginally higher than those in rural areas but much lower
than those in the organised sector, varying significantly across skills, occupations,
experience and location. This Report on Labour Laws in India (“Report”)
examines in detail the legal regime which governs and regulates matters related to
employment in the organised sector of the Indian labour market.
Individual labor law
Contract of employment
The basic feature of labor law in almost every country is that the rights and
obligations of the worker and the employer between one another are mediated
through the contract of employment between the two. This has been the case since
the collapse of feudalism and is the core reality of modern economic relations.
Many terms and conditions of the contract are however implied by legislation or
common law, in such a way as to restrict the freedom of people to agree to certain
things to protect employees, and facilitate a fluid labor market. In the U.S. for
example, majority of state laws allow for employment to be "at will", meaning the
employer can terminate an employee from a position for any reason, so long as the
reason is not an illegal reason, including a termination in violation of public policy.
One example in many countries is the duty to provide written particulars of
employment with the essentialia negotii (Latin for essential terms) to an employee.
This aims to allow the employee to know concretely what to expect and is
expected; in terms of wages, holiday rights, notice in the event of dismissal, job
description and so on. An employer may not legally offer a contract in which the
employer pays the worker less than a minimum wage. An employee may not for
instance agree to a contract which allows an employer to dismiss them unfairly.
There are certain categories that people may simply not agree to because they are
deemed categorically unfair. However, this depends entirely on the particular
legislation of the country in which the work is.
Minimum wage
There may be law stating the minimum amount that a worker can be paid per hour.
Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Greece, Hungary, India,
Ireland, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Paraguay,
Portugal, Poland, Romania, Spain, Taiwan, the United Kingdom, the United States
and others have laws of this kind. The minimum wage is usually different from the
lowest wage determined by the forces of supply and demand in a free market, and
therefore acts as a price floor. Each country sets its own minimum wage laws and
regulations, and while a majority of industrialized countries has a minimum wage,
many developing countries have not.
1. Minimum wages are regulated and stipulated also in some countries that
lack specific laws. In Sweden, for instance, minimum wages are negotiated
between the labor market parties (unions and employer organizations)
through collective agreements that also cover non-union workers and non-
organized employers.
India in 1948, France in 1950, and in the United Kingdom in 1998. In the
European Union, 18 out of 25 member states currently have national minimum
wages.
Working time
Before the Industrial Revolution, the workday varied between 11 and 14 hours.
With the growth of industrialism and the introduction of machinery, longer hours
became far more common, with 14–15 hours being the norm, and 16 not at all
uncommon. Use of child labor was commonplace, often in factories. In England
and Scotland in 1788, about two-thirds of persons working in the new water-
powered textile factories were children.[8] The eight-hour movement's struggle
finally led to the first law on the length of a working day, passed in 1833 in
England, limiting miners to 12 hours, and children to 8 hours. The 10-hour day was
established in 1848, and shorter hours with the same pay were gradually accepted
thereafter. The 1802 Factory Act was the first labour law in the UK.
After England, Germany was the first European country to pass labour laws;
Chancellor Bismarck's main goal being to undermine the Social Democratic Party
of Germany (SPD). In 1878, Bismarck instituted a variety of anti-socialist
measures, but despite this, socialists continued gaining seats in the Reichstag. The
Chancellor, then, adopted a different approach to tackling socialism. To appease
the working class, he enacted a variety of paternalistic social reforms, which
became the first type of social security. The year 1883 saw the passage of the
Health Insurance Act, which entitled workers to health insurance; the worker paid
two-thirds, and the employer one-third, of the premiums. Accident insurance was
provided in 1884, while old age pensions and disability insurance were established
in 1889. Other laws restricted the employment of women and children. These
efforts, however, were not entirely successful; the working class largely remained
unreconciled with Bismarck's conservative government.
In France, the first labor law was voted in 1841. However, it limited only under-
age miners' hours, and it was not until the Third Republic that labour law was
effectively enforced, in particular after Waldeck-Rousseau 1884 law legalizing
trade unions. With the Matignon Accords, the Popular Front (1936–38) enacted the
laws mandating 12 days (2 weeks) each year of paid vacations for workers and the
law limiting to 40 hours the workweek (outside of overtime).
Health and safety
Other labor laws involve safety concerning workers. The earliest English factory
law was drafted in 1802 and dealt with the safety and health of child textile
workers.
Anti-discrimination
This clause means that discrimination against employees is morally unacceptable
and illegal, on a variety of grounds, in particular racial discrimination or sexist
discrimination.
Unfair dismissal
Convention no. 158 of the International Labor Organization states that an
employee "can't be fired without any legitimate motive" and "before offering him
the possibility to defend himself". Thus, on April 28, 2006, after the unofficial
repeal of the French First Employment Contract (CPE), the Longjumeau (Essonne)
conseil des prud'hommes (labor law court) judged the New Employment Contract
(CNE) contrary to international law, and therefore "illegitimate" and "without any
juridical value". The court considered that the two-years period of "fire at will"
(without any legal motive) was "unreasonable", and contrary to convention no.
158, ratified by France.
Child labor
Two girls wearing banners in Yiddish and English with the slogan "Abolish child
slavery!!" at the 1909 May Day parade in New York City
Child labor is the employment of children under an age determined by law or
custom. This practice is considered exploitative by many countries and
international organizations. Child labor was not seen as a problem throughout most
of history, only becoming a disputed issue with the beginning of universal
schooling and the concepts of laborers' and children rights. Child labor can be
factory work, mining or quarrying, agriculture, helping in the parents' business,
having one's own small business (for example selling food), or doing odd jobs.
Some children work as guides for tourists, sometimes combined with bringing in
business for shops and restaurants (where they may also work as waiters). Other
children are forced to do tedious and repetitive jobs such as assembling boxes, or
polishing shoes. However, rather than in factories and sweatshops, most child labor
occurs in the informal sector, "selling on the street, at work in agriculture or hidden
away in houses — far from the reach of official inspectors and from media
scrutiny."
Collective labor law
Collective labor law concerns the tripartite relationship between employer,
employee and trade unions. Trade unions, sometimes called "labor unions"
Trade unions
Some countries require unions to follow particular procedures before taking certain
actions. For example, some countries require that unions ballot the membership to
approve a strike or to approve using members' dues for political projects. Laws
may guarantee the right to join a union (banning employer discrimination), or
remain silent in this respect. Some legal codes may allow unions to place a set of
obligations on their members, including the requirement to follow a majority
decision in a strike vote. Some restrict this, such as the 'right to work' legislation in
some of the United States.
Strikes
Strikers gathering in Tyldesley in the 1926 General Strike in the U.K.
Strike action is the weapon of the workers most associated with industrial disputes,
and certainly among the most powerful. In most countries, strikes are legal under a
circumscribed set of conditions. Among them may be that:
The strike is decided on by a prescribed democratic process. (Wildcat strikes
are illegal).
Sympathy strikes, against a company by which workers are not directly
employed, may be prohibited.
General strikes may be forbidden by a public order.
Certain categories of person may be forbidden to strike (airport personnel,
health personnel, teachers, police or firemen, etc.)
Strikes may be pursued by people continuing to work, as in Japanese strike
actions which increase productivity to disrupt schedules, or in hospitals.
A boycott is a refusal to buy, sell, or otherwise trade with an individual or business
who is generally believed by the participants in the boycott to be doing something
morally wrong. Throughout history, workers have used tactics such as the go-slow,
sabotage, or just not turning up en-masse to gain more control over the workplace
environment, or simply have to work less Some labor law explicitly bans such
activity, none explicitly allows it.
Pickets
Picketing is a tactic which is often used by workers during strikes. They may
congregate outside the business they are striking against to make their presence
felt, increase worker participation, and dissuade (or prevent) strike breakers from
entering the workplace. In many countries, this activity is restricted by labor law,
by more general law restricting demonstrations, or sometimes by injunctions on
particular pickets. For example, labor law may restrict secondary picketing
(picketing a business not directly connected with the dispute, such as a supplier of
materials), or flying pickets (mobile strikers who travel to join a picket). There
may be laws against obstructing others from going about their lawful business
(scabbing, for example, is lawful); making obstructive pickets illegal, and, in some
countries, such as Britain, there may be court orders made from time to time
against pickets being in particular places or behaving in particular ways (shouting
abuse, for example).
Workplace involvement
Workplace consolation statutes exist in many countries, requiring that employers
consult their workers on issues that concern their place in the company. Industrial
democracy refers to the same idea, but taken much further. Not only that workers
should have a voice to be listened to, but that workers have a vote to be counted.
Co-determination
Originating in Germany, some form of co-determination (or Mitbestimmung)
procedure is practised in countries across continental Europe, such as Holland and
the Czech Republic, as well as Scandinavian countries (e.g. Sweden). This
involves the rights of workers to be represented on the boards of companies for
whom they work. The German model involves half the board of directors being
appointed by the company trade union. However, German company law uses a
split board system, with a 'supervisory board' (Aufsichtsrat) which appoints an
'executive board' (Vorstand). Shareholders and unions elect the supervisory board
in equal number, except that the head of the supervisory board is, under co-
determination law, a shareholder representative. While not gaining complete
parity, there has been solid political consensus since the Helmut Schmidt social
democrat government introduced the measure in 1976.
In the United Kingdom, the similar proposals were drawn up, and a command
paper produced named the Bullock Report (Industrial democracy). This was
released in 1977 by the James Callaghan Labour government. This proposal
involved a similar split on the board, but its effect would have been even more
radical. Because British company law requires no split in the boards of directors,
unions would have directly elected the management of the company. Furthermore,
rather than giving shareholders the slight upper hand as happened in Germany, a
debated 'independent' element would be added to the board, reaching the formula
2x + y. However, no action was ever taken as the UK slid into the winter of
discontent. This tied into the European Commission's proposals for worker
participation in the 'fifth company law directive', which was also never
implemented.
In Sweden, this is regulated through the 'Law on board representation' (Lagen om
styrelserepresentation). The law covers all private companies with 25 or more
employees. In these companies, workers (usually through unions) have a right to
appoint two board members and two substitutes. If the company has more than
1,000 employees, three members and three substitutes are appointed by
workers/unions. It is common practice that seats are divided between
representatives from the major union coalitions
International labor law
One of the crucial concerns of workers and those who believe that labor rights are
importantis that in a globalizing economy, common social standards ought to
support economic development in common markets. However, there is nothing in
the way of international enforcement of labor rights, with the notable exception of
labor law within the European Union. At the Doha round of trade talks through the
World Trade Organization one of the items for discussion was the inclusion of
some kind of minimum standard of worker protection. The chief question is
whether, with the breaking down of trade barriers in the international economy,
while this can benefit consumers it can also make the ability of multinational
companies to bargain down wage costs even greater, in wealthier Western
countries and developing nations alike. The ability of corporations to shift their
supply chains from one country to another with relative ease could be the starting
gun for a "regulatory race to the bottom", whereby nation states are forced into a
merciless downward spiral, not only slashing tax rates and public services with it
but also laws that in the short term cost employers money. Countries are forced to
follow suit, on this view, because should they not foreign investment will dry up,
move places with lower "burdens" and leave more people jobless and poor. This
argument is by no means uncontested. The opposing viewsuggests that free
competition for capital investment between different countries increases the
dynamic efficiency of the market place. Faced with the discipline that markets
enforce, countries are incentivized to invest in education, training, and skills in
their workforce to obtain a comparative advantage. Government initiative is
spurred, because rational long term investment will be perceived as the better
choice to increasing regulation. This theory concludes that an emphasis on
deregulation is more beneficial than not. That said, neither the International Labor
Organization (see below), nor the European Union takes this view.
Impact of ILO on Labor Laws in India
The ILO (International Labor Organization) was set up in the year 1919, with an
aim to improve the conditions of labors around the world.India was the founding
member of ILO, which has now expanded its membership to 145 nations. ILO
through its conventions and recommendations helps nations to draw their own set
of labor laws for the better treatment of the working class, and the preservation of
their rights. The principal means of action in the ILO is the setting up the
International Labor Standards in the form of Conventions and Recommendations.
Conventions are international treaties and are instruments, which create legally
binding obligations on the countries that ratify them. Recommendations are non-
binding and set out guidelines orienting national policies and actions.
Labor Law regulates matters, such as, labor employment, remunerations, and
conditions of work, trade unions, and labor management relations. They also
include social laws regulating such aspects as compensation for accident caused to
a worker at work, fixation of minimum wages, maternity benefits, sharing of the
company’s profit by the workers, and so on. Most of these legal instruments
regulate rights and responsibilities of the working people.
The approach of India with regard to International Labor Standards has always
been positive. The ILO instruments have provided guidelines and useful
framework for the evolution of legislative and administrative measures for the
protection and advancement of the interest of labor. To that extent the influence of
ILO Conventions as a standard for reference for labor legislation and practices in
India, rather than as a legally binding norm, has been significant. Ratification of a
Convention imposes legally binding obligations on the country concerned and,
therefore, India has been careful in ratifying Conventions. It has always been the
practice in India that we ratify a Convention when we are fully satisfied that our
laws and practices are in conformity with the relevant ILO Convention. It is now
considered that a better course of action is to proceed with progressive
implementation of the standards, leave the formal ratification for consideration at a
later stage when it becomes practicable. We have so far rat
ified 39 Conventions of the ILO, which is much better than the position obtaining
in many other countries. Even where for special reasons, India may not be in a
position to ratify a Convention, India has generally voted in favor of the
Conventions reserving its position as far as its future ratification is concerned.
The Effect of Labor Market Regulations
A number of studies have attempted to estimate the effects of labor market
regulations on economic outcomes in India. Fallon and Lucas (1991) and (1993)
studied the effect of job security laws by analyzing the effects of the 1976
introduction of chapter Vb in the Industrial Disputes Act (IDA), which mandated
firms employing 300 or more workers to request permission from the government
prior to retrench. They found a large impact on manufacturing jobs: formal
employment for a given level of output declined by 17.5 percent. Similarly, Dutta
Roy (2004) examined the effects of the 1982 central amendment to the IDA, which
extended the prohibition to retrench workers without government authorization to
firms that employed hundred or more workers. The author found evidence of
substantial adjustment costs in employment but no evidence that such costs are
driven or altered by the IDA legislative amendment. Both studies however do not
control for other macro or policy change that could confound the before-after
comparison. Besley and Burgess (2004) isolate the effect of a labor reform in a
given state, from changes in policies and macroeconomic variables that are
common across states, thus better identifying the effect of labor laws, however
their measure of regulations aggregates different types of labor regulations and
therefore their results are not directly comparable to the other studies. They find
labor regulations to have important adverse effects on output and employment,
particularly in the registered manufacturing sector.
Hasan, Mitra and Ramaswamy (2003) examine whether differences in labor laws
explain differences in the way labor markets adjusted to trade reforms. They find
that states with more stringent labor regulations (measured as in Besley and
Burgess 2004) have lower demand elasticities and these elasticities are less
affected by trade reforms. Finally Lall and Mengistae (2005) examine the influence
of labor market regulations –as perceived by employers—on plant productivity
differences across Indian cities. They find that differences in the degree of labor
regulations, jointly with differences in the severity of power shortages, explain a
large share of the productivity gaps between cities. As in Bestley and Burgess
(2004) by aggregating different labor laws into one unique measure, they cannot
identify which labor laws are the ones responsible for adverse economic outcomes.
From the policy perspective, understanding which laws and regulation have
more adverse effects is an important question. Since labor laws have proven very
difficult to change, focusing precious political capital in reforming some aspects of
the law may be one way to mobilize support behind reforms.
Why Different Labor Laws may have Different Effects on Economic
Outcomes?
Different labor regulations are expected to cause differential impacts on economic
variables because each may involve a different combination of at least three
effects: (1) a price effect, (2) an expropriation effect, and (3) a rigidity effect. Price
effects occur when regulations increase the cost of labor. Expropriation effects are
related to holdup problems that occur when regulations make it easier for workers
to appropriate part of the return of an employers’ investment once that investment
is sunk7. This is the case, for instance, when regulations increase workers’ ability
to initiate and sustain industrial disputes. Finally rigidity effects occur when
regulations make the adjustment of labor (or other factors) more costly and
difficult. Regulations that increase the price of labor or generate expropriation
effects are expected to have a negative effect on the demand for labor. Instead,
regulations that increase the cost of adjusting employment have ambiguous effects
since they may cause a reduction of both job creation and job See Besley and
Burgess (2002) for a simple model of the expropriation effect. destruction (Bertola,
1990). Thus ultimately, whether regulations have a positive or
negative effect on employment depends on whether their dampening effects on job
creation are offset by a reduction in job destruction. The effects on capital will also
depend on which of the three effects dominate. While the price and rigidity effect
may lead firms to substitute labor for capital, the fear of expropriation may create
strong disincentives on investment and capital formation.
Regulations that specifically target employment adjustment such as chapter Vb are
likely to induce large price and rigidity effects, and possibly some expropriation
effects as workers’ bargaining power vis-à-vis employers increases the more
secure workers feel in their job. On the other hand, regulations that increase the
cost of solving industrial disputes are likely to generate expropriation effects
associated with the increased uncertainty regarding firms’ ability to solve
industrial conflict in their favor. They also create price effects as the price of labor
involves the additional costs of handling labor disputes. Finally, they may also
create some rigidity effects as dismissal related labor disputes become more costly
for firms. The former implies that the effects of a given regulation on outcomes are
ambiguous and depend on which of the three effects dominate. Therefore, the issue
of what are the effects of different pieces of regulation on employment.
Research Methodology
Research is the process of systematic and in-depth study or search for any
particular topic, subject or area of investigation, backed by collection, compilation,
presentation and interpretation of relevant details or data. Research methodology is
a way to systematically solve the research problem. It may be understood as a
science of studying how research is done scientifically.
Research may develop hypothesis and test it. In it we study the various steps
that are generally adopted by the researcher in studying his research problem along
with the logic behind them.
Research must be based on fact observable data forms a sound basis for
research inductive investigation lead better support to research finding for
analyzing facts a scientific methodology of analysis must be developed and result
interpreted logically.
It is necessary for the researcher to know not only the research method or
techniques but also the methodology. Thus, when we talk of research methodology
we not only talk of the research methods but also consider the logic behind the
methods we use in the context of our research study and explain why we are using
a particular method or technique and why we are not using others so that research
results are capable of being evaluated either by the researcher himself or by others.
Research problems would result in certain conclusions by means of logical
analysis which the decision-maker may use for his action or solution.
OBJECTIVES OF STUDY:
1) To study the LABOUR LAW provided to employees
2) To study how the organization motivate the employees by identifying and
satisfying their unsatisfied needs.
3) To know which special facilities are provided to reserved class categories
like SC, ST, OBC etc.. by the organization.
RESEARCH PROCESS:
In research process, the first and foremost step is selecting and defining a
research problem. A researcher should at first find the problem. Then he should
formulate it so that it becomes susceptible to research. For a systematic
presentation, the process of research may be classified under three stages-
primary stage, secondary stage, and the tertiary stage.
The primary stage includes:-
i) Observation
ii) Interest
iii) Formulating research problem
iv) Documentation
v) Preparation of a bibliography &
vi) Research design
The secondary stage includes:-
i) Project planning
ii) Data collection
iii) Analysis of data
iv) Testing of hypothesis
v) Interpretation
vi) Questionnaire preparation
The tertiary stage includes:-
i) Report writing
ii) Observation, suggestions, and conclusions.
iii) Preparation of a bibliography
OBSERVATION
Research starts with observation, which leads to curiosity to learn more
about what has been observed. While observation leads to research the
research results in elaborate observations and conclusions; or even further
research.
The observation method is widely used mainly because of its simplicity,
usefulness in the framing of hypothesis, its accuracy; the possibility of
getting convincing results, the possibility of the test of validity etc. to be
precise, observation tends to be the basic of any research.
INTEREST
The observation of certain occurrences creates an interest and
inquisitiveness in the mind of the research to study it future. This is the basis
of interest to study the subject matter of observation. The interest is the
guiding force behind any research.
FORMULATING RESEARCH PROBLEM
The research problem undertaken for study must be carefully selected.
The problem must be defined thoroughly and should be framed into
meaningful terms from the analytical point of view. The area of working must
be decided.
I had got the information from the HOD of HR department and from some
of the employees.
Industrial progress largely depend on committee labour force the benefits
which go under this nomenclature are of great importance to the employee and
which he is enable to secure by himself. The scheme of labour welfare may be
regarded as a wise investment which should on usually does brings profitable
return in the form of greater efficiency.
Thus we can say that welfare facilities are the base of effective and
efficient working of the employees in the organization in my opinion welfare
has a great importance in the organization.
DOCUMENTATION
The documentary source is an important source of information for a
researcher. A document is any thing in writing a record, files or diaries,
published or unpublished- which can be extracted and used in research. It is a
very valuable source of information for a research. Documentation is the
process of collecting & extracting the documents which are relevant to
research.
RESEARCH DESIGN
After formulating the problem the research design has to be prepared.
Preparation of research design involves selection of means of obtaining
information, time available for research and selection of method of tabulation
& presentation of data.
The research of my project is descriptive study. I have obtained
information by the HOD of the HR Department and some of the employees of
the organization & also from annual reports of company, newspapers,
magazines and websites.
PROJECT PLANNING
Project planning is the first step in actually conducting & directing a
research project. It is one of the most important tasks of a researcher. This
includes formulation of the research objectives & goals and determining ways
of achieving them.
DATA COLLECTION
Data collection is one of the most important aspects of research. For the
success of any project accurate data is very important and necessary. The
information collected through research methodology must be accurate and
relevant.
The data collection method can be classified into two methods:-
- Primary Data
- Secondary Data
- Primary Data:
Data collected by a researcher is known as primary data. It is collected by
a person for his own use obtained from findings. This is considered as
first hand information. This is that data which is collected by us to meet
our own specific purpose. The data is collected by the means of
questionnaire filled in by the employees at different posts of Nagpur area
office. This method of data collection is very popular particularly in big
organizations.
THE RESEARCH APPROACH:
Survey Method
THE RESEARCH INSTRUMENT:
Questionnaire
THE RESPONDENTS:
The employees of the organization.
- Secondary Data:
Secondary data means data that are already available ie, they refer to data
which has already been collected and analyzed by some one else. This
type of data information can also be used by the researcher for his use as
second hand information sources through which secondary data can be
collected.
Secondary data may either be published data or unpublished data.
Published data used here is from:-
i) Magazines
ii) Annual reports of the company
iii) Newspapers etc.
The sources of unpublished data are diaries, letters, unpublished internal
records made available by staff members etc.
Thus, the primary source of data collection was the interview and
questionnaire methods. The secondary data was collected through
magazines, annual reports of the company, internal records of the
organization and through websites.
ANALYSIS OF DATA
Once the collection of data is complete, it should be analyzed and
processed through classification tabulation etc in accordance with the
subject matter. A careful planning of the analytical framework should
therefore be done by the researcher. Data analysis is carried out by
arranging the data received by the employees in an excel sheet. This data
is then converted into graphical forms. Pie charts have also been used for
the tabulation and interpretation of data collected.
INTERPRETATION
After testing the hypothesis the researcher comes out with his
conclusions. The explanation of theory can also be considered as
interpretation.
QUESTIONNAIRE PREPARATION
The basic requisite of any research study is the appropriate data which
can be collected with the help of a schedule or a questionnaire. With the
help of questionnaire it is easy to determine the satisfaction level of so
many employees in the organization.
SAMPLING SIZE
The sampling size on which the analysis is based is 72.
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
The sampling technique used for carrying out this study is RANDOM
sampling technique.
the researcher has to prepare a final report along with conclusion and
suggestions.
PREPARATION OF A BIBLIOGRAPHY
At the end of any research report a bibliography is generally added.
This is the list of books, publications, periodicals, journals, reports, etc
which are used by the researcher in connection with the study.
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Q. 1) How many facilities provided by the company to you?
25%
25%25%
25%
Canteen Housing
Education Medical
Conclusion:- Basic facilities are provided to the employees in the form of above
mentioned facilities.
Q.2) How many special facilities have you availed?
62%
30%
8%
2 to 5 5 to 6 6 and above
Conclusion:- More than six special facilities are availed by 62% employees.
Q.3) How many facilities are you availing on routine basis?
Conclusion:- all the employees availing routine welfare facility 60% are saying
that they are availing 10 and above facilities on routine basis rest 25 % and 15%
saying that they are availing 5 to 10 and 1 to 5 respectively.
60%25%
15%
1 to 5 5 to 10
10 and above
Q.4) How many facilities are provided for education of children to employees?
35%
25%
40%
Bus facility
School facility
Education loan facil-ity
Conclusion:- This suggest employees are quit satisfied with the facilities provided
to them and it also help in improving their morale.
Q.5) Are you getting wages as per basic minimum criteria allotted by
government?
75%
20%
5%
Yes No
No Suggestions
Conclusion:- 75% of the employees are accepted that they are getting wages as per
the basic minimum criteria allotted by government.
Q.6) How much time it will take for sanctioning special welfare facilities?
10%
50%
40%1 week
2 to 3 week
3 to 4 week
Conclusion:-Welfare facility can those be sanctioned within a time period of 2 to 3
week making the progress. Quite easy for employees.
Q.7) Is there suitable ventilation and good environment in the work place?
65%
20%
15%
Yes
No
No Suggestions
Q.9) How much are you satisfied by the procedure of availing routine welfare
facilities?
30%
60%
5% 5%
highly satisfied
satisfied
partly satisfied
not satisfied
Conclusion:- The 30% of the employees are highly satisfied, 60% are satisfied and
rest of the employees is 5% partly satisfied and 5% are not satisfied.
Q.10) How much are you satisfied by the procedure of availing special welfare
facilities?
62%
28%
6%4%
highly satisfied
satisfied
partly satisfied
not satisfied
Conclusion:- 62% employees are highly satisfied, 28% are satisfied and rest of the
employees are 6% partly satisfied and 4% are not satisfied.
Q.11) Kindly suggest the methods of improving or adding special welfare
facilities?
17%
75%
8%No improvement
early action should be taken
proper time should be taken
Q.12) Does welfare benefits provided by the organization plays as a
motivational factor?
53%45%
2%
highly agree
agree
disagree
Conclusion:- 53% employees are highly agree that the welfare benefits provided by
the organization plays a motivational factor.
Q.13) Do you get medical reimbursement on time?
53%
30%
2%15%
yes and with full re-imbursementyes but with reduced reimbursementNoNot applicable
Conclusion:- 53% employees agree that they gets full medical reimbursement.
Q.14) Briefly explain the procedure of availing routine welfare facilities in
points?
25%
70%
5%making appli,submit prof n imme sanc
only application is required
just an approach
Conclusion:- 5% employees says that just an approach is required to avail the
routine welfare facility while 25% employees says that to make the application
submit the proof and the 70% employees says that only application is required.
Q.15) Briefly explain the procedure availing the special welfare facilities in
points?
75%
5%
20%lengthy process
not availed
apply take approval n show proof
Conclusion:- 5% of the employees of organization says that they had not availed
any special welfare facility 75% says that the procedure is apply the approval and
show proof and the other 20% says that the procedure is too lengthy process.
OBSERVATION AND CONCLUSION
The employees of the organization are found to be satisfied with the facilities
provided to them by the company.
They still want more focus on family welfare. They want that the time period for
sanctioning special welfare facility should be reduced.
- More than 70% of the employees agree that the welfare facilities are
provided to them and they are availing special welfare facilities according
to their need.
- A neat, clean and peaceful environment of the organization helps in
maintaining satisfaction and enthusiasm to perform work among the
employees.
- The employees of the Nagpur Area Office of WCL are highly satisfied
with the routine welfare facilities which they are availing on a regular
basis.
- The routine welfare facilities are availed by each employee in the
organization by simply filling an application, without any proof and the
time required is also nominal.
- The time required for sanctioning the special welfare facilities is 2-3 week.
- The process of availing special welfare facility is very lengthy and hence it
can be availed by following simple process.
Conclusions
Labor regulations are generally introduced to improve the lot of workers.
However our results suggest that in India they are not achieving this goal. Not
only regulations have created large costs for society, but they haven’t raised
workers’ labor share. Instead, workers have been left with an equal share of a
much smaller cake. In the process a large number of job opportunities in the
registered sector have been lost, and while some workers have found refuge in
the informal sector, the swelling ranks in this sector are likely to be associated
with lower earnings in this sector.
We also find that while regulations such as chapter Vb of IDA tend to get all
the attention, there are important costs associated with regulations that
increase the cost of settling industrial disputes. If anything, our findings
suggest that their costs for society and for registered sector workers may be
higher than those associated with job security laws. By reducing investment,
employment and wages, they generate pure costs for workers and for the
society as a whole. Improving the conciliation-arbitrationadjudication
is a pending reform that could bear important gains for all parties involved
Nonetheless, the attention on chapter Vb is well placed. Our results suggest
important employment effects associated with the enactment of amendments
to this chapter.
Moreover, even when earnings may increase somewhat as a result of such
policies, registered sector workers lose as employment opportunities dwindle
and their wage bill declines with employment. Labor intensive sectors such as
textiles are the hardest hit eroding the comparative advantage of India in labor
intensive industries, and in the process removing viable job opportunities for a
large number of people. Perhaps not surprisingly, contract labor has become a
common way to deal with these problems. Yet, such solution is no panacea. It
further expands the degree of labor market segmentation by generating first
and second-class workers within the manufacturing registered sector.
Secondly, the widespread use of contract labor does not seem alleviate the
adverse effects of labor regulations, particularly in regards to employment.
Nonetheless, it has some positive direct effects on employment independently
on labor regulations. Therefore, while further liberalization of the use of
contract labor is likely to create some additional jobs and increase output and
investment, it is unlikely to bring back the jobs lost due to inappropriate labor
regulations.
India must find alternative way to improve labor conditions for the majority of
workers. While traditionally portrayed as labor advances against the abuses of
capital, current labor regulations favor no one. The answer to this conundrum
does not involve a complete deregulation of the labor market. Instead, it
requires better regulation (and appropriate enforcement) so workers’
fundamental rights can be protected and jobs can be created.
SUGGESTIONS AND LIMITATIONS
SUGGESTIONS
1) Sanctioning time of special welfare facility should be reduced.
2) New facilities should be added to the existing ones by early action taken by
management.
3) Medical reimbursement should also be continued after the retirement.
LIMITATIONS
1) The study does not cover the entire work for as sample size is 72.
2) The study is based on a particular class of employees i.e. Officer, clerk etc.
3) The result depends on the answers received from respondent which may be
biased.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Sr.No Authors Year Title City of
publication
Publisher
1 V.S.P.Rao 2000 Human
Resource
New Delhi Excel Books
2 K.Ashwathappa 1997 Human
Resource and
Personal
Management
New Delhi Tata Mc
Graw-Hill
Publishing
Co. Ltd.
3 Company
Magazines-
Khanan Bharti
Pragati
Nagpur WCL Coal
Estate, Civil
Lines, Nagpur
Annual Reports of Organization