Date post: | 29-May-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | albertellilaw |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 15
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
1/15
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
BANKUNITED,
as [purported]successor in interestto [LAWFULLY SEIZED] BANKUNITED, FSB.,
purported plaintiff
vs. DISPOSED CASE NO.: 09-6016-CA
JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT, et al.
___________________________________________________________________________/
LACK OFjurisdiction NOTICE TO CIRCUIT & DISTRICT COURTS
MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE OF CH. 673, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND
SEIZED BANKS FAILURE TO establish any note &state any cause
MEMORANDUM
1. The attached Docket showed:
09/02/2010 ORDER BY DCA
APPELLANT SHALL WITHIN 15 DAYS SHALL FILE AN AMENDED APPEAL
Here, neither this Court nor the District Court of Appeal hadjurisdiction.
2. The enforcementoflostpromissory notes, which are negotiable instruments, is governed by
section 673.3091, Florida Statutes and notsection 71.011, which governs enforcementoflost
papers.
3. In State Street Bank and Trust Co., Trustee for Holders of Bear Stearns Mortgage Securities,
Inc. Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1993-12 v. Harley Lord, et al., 851 So.2d
790 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), the Court held that State Street could not maintain a cause of
action to enforce a missing promissory note or to foreclose on the related mortgage in the
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
2/15
2
absenceof proofthat it or its assignor ever held possession of the promissory note. Section
673.3091, Florida Statutes (2002).
4. In Mason v. Rubin, 727 So.2d 2883 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) the court had previously held that
the reestablishmentof a lostpromissory note which is a negotiable instrumentis controlled
by section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (1993) and notsection 71.011, Florida Statutes (1995).
The court explained that section 71.011, Florida Statutes (1995) provides forestablishinglost
documents except when otherwise provided the implication being that section 673.3091,
Florida Statutes (1993) otherwise provides. The court also characterized the provisions of
section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (1993) as more stringent requirements than section
71.011, Florida Statutes (1995).
5. The Court explained that pursuant to section 90.953, Florida Statutes, (2002), Floridas code
of evidence, the plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure must present the original promissory note
because a duplicate of a note is not admissible. Otherwise, the plaintiff must meet the
requirements of section 673.3091, Florida Statutes topursue enforcement. W. H. Dwoning v.
First Natl Bank of Lake City, 81 So.2d 486 (Fla.1955), Natl Loan Investors, L.P. v. Joymar
Assocs., 767 So.2d 549, 551 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).
6. In this fraudulent action, there was no evidence as to WHOpossessed WHAT purported
noteWHEN. See also Slizyk v. Smilack, 825 So.2d 428, 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), Deakter
v. Menendez, 830 So.2d 124 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH STATUTES AND STATE A CAUSE OF ACTION
7. If a party is not in possession of the original note and cannot reestablish it, the party cannot
prevailin an action on the note. In Dasma Investments, LLC v. Realty Associates Fund III,
L.P., 459 F.Supp.2d 1294 (S.D.Fla.2006) the court explained that in Florida a promissory
note is a negotiable instrumentand that a partysuing on a promissory note, whether just on
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
3/15
3
the note itself or together with a foreclose on a mortgage securing the note, must be in
possession of the original of the note orreestablish the note pursuant to Fla. Stat. 673.3091.
Shelter Dev. Group, Inc. v. Mma of Georgia, Inc., 50 B.R. 588, 590 (Bkrtcy. S.D. Fla.1985).
LAWFULLY SEIZED BANKUNITEDS FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CH. 673, F.S.
8. A party must comply with section 673.3091, Florida Statues, in order to enforce a lost,
destroyed orstolennegotiable instrument. Here, lawfully seized BankUnited, FSB [F.D.I.C.
seizure]
a. FAILED to state that the creditors everreceived possession of any original promissory
note;
b. FAILED tostate a cause of action;c. FAILED tosatisfy the conditions precedentto sue, Ch. 673, Florida Statutes;
d. COULD NOTpossibly have complied withsection 673.3091, Florida Statues.
RECORD LACK OFpromissory note
9. The original document that is generally required to be filed with the court in a mortgage
foreclosure proceeding is the promissory note, not the mortgage. The Evidence Code
provides the rationale for this conclusion. Section 90.952, Florida Statutes (2002), indicates
that original documents are required to prove the contents of a writing.
10. A promissory note is a negotiableinstrumentwithin the definition of section 673.1041(1),
and either the original must be produced, or the lost document must be reestablishedunder
section 673.3091, Florida Statutes (2002). See Mason v. Rubin, 727 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 4th
DCA 1999); see also Downing v. First Nat'l Bank of Lake City, 81 So. 2d 486 (Fla. 1955);
Thompson v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 673 So. 2d 1179 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Figueredo v.
Bank Espirito Santo, 537 So. 2d 1113 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).
LAWFULLY SEIZED BANKUNITED HAD NO right to the payment of money
11. Here, no writing on file evidenced any right to the payment of money by lawfully seized
bankrupt bankBankUnited, FSB, Ch. 673, Florida Statutes.
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
4/15
4
JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT DEMANDED PROTECTION FROM FRAUD
12. Because it is negotiable, the promissory note must be surrendered in a foreclosure
proceedingso that it does not remain in the stream of commerce. Indeed, if the foreclosing
party alleges that the note is lost,destroyed orstolen, the trial court is authorized by statute
to take the necessary actions to protect the party purportedly required to pay the note against
loss that might occur by reason of a claim by another party to enforce the instrument. See
section 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. (2002).
13. A mortgage is the security for the payment of the negotiable promissory note, and is a mere
incident of and ancillary to such note.
08/12/2010 FINAL DISPOSITION FOR LACK OF proper plaintiff
LAWFULLY SEIZED BANKUNITED, FSB, HAD NO interest& NOstanding
14. Here, the admittedloss, the time and manner of which was unknown, was
a. the result of a transfer orlawful seizure, [F.D.I.C.], Ch. 673, Florida Statutes;
b. precluded any establishmentof any agreementand/orbreach of contract.
BUSTED BANKUNITED FAILED ITS BURDEN
15. Here, the burden was on lawfully seized BankUnited, i.e., the party seeking to enforce the
lost instrument. See 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. (2008).
PROVEN INVALIDITY OF RECORD
16. Furthermore here, the invalidity had been proven in the pleadings, Fla. Stat. 673.3081
(2008).
17. A court will not enforce an instrument unless the defendant will be adequately protected
against future claims on the lostnote. Perry v. Fairbanks, 888 So.2d 725, 727, (Fla. 5d DCA
2004).
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
5/15
5
18. Here, lawfully seized BankUnited FSB, did not have standingto bringand/ormaintain any
mortgage foreclosure action against Jennifer Franklin Prescott, because it had proven on the
record that it did not holdany note and /ormortgage. Here, said admitted and knownnon-
holderof any note had nostandingto seek any enforcementof the fictitious note.
LAWFUL SEIZURE, FDIC, OF BANKUNITED, FSBS PROPERTY & NOTES
19. The property of bankrupt BankUnited, FSB, was lawfullyseized, Ch. 673, Florida
Statutes. Here in particular, any and all notes and mortgages in the name of failed
BankUnited, FSB, were lawfully seized. Here, lawfully seizedBankUnited, FSB:
a. was not aproper party to bringthis facially fraudulentaction;b. failed tostate a cause of action;
c. could never, under any circumstances, be the proper plaintiffto bring any foreclosure
action against Jennifer Franklin Prescott.
LAWFUL SEIZURE OF BUSTED BANKUNITED, FSB
20. The admittedloss of the fictitiouspromissory note was due to lawful seizure ofbankrupt
BankUnited, FSB, and/ortransfer. Here, lawfully seizedBankUnited was not entitled to
enforce the fictitiousnote.
SEIZED BANKUNITED FAILED TO COMPLY WITH CONDITION PRECEDENT
21. Here, lawfully seized BankUnited could not havepossiblysatisfiedthe absolutelyrequired
condition precedent, Ch. 673, Florida Statutes.
FRAUDULENT & FALSE PRETENSES - MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION
22. BankUnited, FSB, fraudulently pretended:
9. On February 15, 2006, Franklin Prescott executed and delivered a promissorynote to Bankunited Complaint, p. 3.
Here on 02/15/2006, BankUnited had not even legally existed.
16.Plaintiff owns and holds the note and mortgage. Complaint, p. 5.
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
6/15
6
6. Said [fictitious ] promissory note and mortgage have been lostordestroyedand
are notin the custody or control of BankUnited, and the time and mannerof the lossor destruction is unknown. Complaint, p. 3.
Here, bankrupt BankUnited did notholdorown any note and mortgage. Here, any and
all notes and mortgages had been seized by a U.S Agency. Here, there was fraud on the
Court, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540.
THIS COURTS AUTHORITY TO SANCTION SEIZED BANKS ATTORNEY(S)
23. This court has ample authority to sanction lawyers and lenders asserting improper and
facially fraudulentforeclosure claims. Here, Federal Agents had lawfully seized bankrupt
BankUnited, FSB. This courts authority to sanction crooked attorneys is explicit in Florida
law and implicit in the courts' inherent power to sanction bad faith litigation.
24. Any party seeking toforeclose a mortgagewithout a good faith belief in the facts giving rise
to the asserted claim may be sanctioned upon the court's initiative. 57.105(1), Fla. Stat.
25. This statute affords judges the authority to immediately impose significant penalties for
bringing unfounded litigation. See Moakely v. Smallwood, 826 So. 2d 221, 223 (Fla. 2002),
citing United States Savings Bank v. Pittman, 80 Fla. 423, 86 So. 567, 572 (1920)
(sanctioning attorney foracting in bad faith in a mortgage foreclosure sale).
CONFIRMED CANCELLATION
26. On 09/02/2010, at 11:20 AM, the Clerk inside Hearing Room 4-1, Naples Courthouse, and
Bailiff D. Chenoweth confirmed the cancellation of the unauthorized hearing before
judicial imposter Tony Perez and/or Antonio J. Perez-Benitoa.
27. The Court explained that Perez-Benitoa was under contract with this Court for one day
per week. The Court did not disclose Tony Perez credentials.
28. Franklin Prescott contacted the Florida Bar in this matter.
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
7/15
7
29. Pursuant to the Magistrates Office, Debbie, Supervisor, Melanie [09/02/2010, AM], the
09/02/2010 hearing before judicial imposter Tony Perez was cancelled.
30. Here, the law required use of the legal name of anyjudicial officer. Tony Perez is not any
legal name.
NOTICE OF UNTIMELY notice and entry
31. On the day of the unauthorizedhearing, 09/02/2010, the notice of hearing appeared for
the first time. On 09/01/2010, said notice had not appearedon the Docket.
IMPROPER USE OF NON-LEGAL NAME JUDICIAL IMPOSTER Tony Perez
32. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of Jennifer Franklin Prescotts cancellation of
unauthorized 09/02/2010 hearing because there was
a. Non-consent by J. Franklin Prescott;
b. Noorder of referralto any magistrate;
c. Nonotice of hearing;d. Nosetting party of record;
e. Nojurisdiction;
f. Nostanding.
Here, seized and bankrupt BankUnited, FSB, had nostandingand could not havepossibly
been anyparty.
33. Pursuant to the Magistrates Office, Supervisor Debbie, Rose, 239-252-8870
a. Jennifer Franklin Prescott faxed her filed and recorded NOTICE OF NON-CONSENTand NOTICE OF OBJECTION to the Magistrates Office;
b. Jennifer Franklin Prescotts MOTION TO DISMISS is not to be heard in the record
absence of any notice of hearingrequired under the Rules. See Docket of this disposed
Case.
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
8/15
8
34. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of Jennifer Franklin Prescotts service of NOTICE OF
DISPOSITION AND NON-CONSENT upon the magistrate and/or Antonio J. Perez-Benitoa
at:
a. Magistrates Office, c/o Supervisor Debbie, Rose
Naples Courthouse
5th
FloorNaples, FL 34112,
T: 252-8331, F: 252-8870 and
b. Antonio J. Perez-Benitoa, P.A.
900 Sixth Avenue South
Suite 303Naples, Florida 34102
Telephone: 239-430-1884Fax: 239-30-1885
http://www.tonypblaw.com
35. Jennifer Franklin Prescott, record holder of unencumbered title to the subject property
[address: 25 6th
ST North, Naples, Florida 34102] does not consent and objected to any
referral to any magistrate, hearing officer, and/or special master, Rule 1.490, Florida
Rules of Civil Procedure.
JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTTS OBJECTIONS TO ANY magistrate
36. In particular, J. Franklin Prescott objects and did not consentto any magistrate
a. findings of fact;
b. conclusions of law.
MEMORANDUM
A REFERRAL TO A MAGISTRATE REQUIRES THE CONSENT OF ALL
PARTIES. JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT IS ENTITLED TO HAVE THIS
MATTER HEARD BY A JUDGE AND DOES NOT WANT TO HAVE THISMATTER HEARD BY ANY MAGISTRATE. JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
FILE A WRITTEN OBJECTION TO FICTITIOUS referral PRIOR TO
COMMENCEMENT OF THE HEARING.
Here, no hearingcanpossibly commence.
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
9/15
9
PUBLICLY RECORDED 08/12/2010 FINAL DISPOSITION
37. On 08/12/2010, Def. Judge Hugh D. Hayes disposed of the fraudulent action.
NO order of referral
38. Here, there were
a. 08/12/2010 Final Disposition;
b. Noorder of referral;c. No notice of any hearing;
d. J. Franklin Prescotts non-consent and objection to any magistrate referraland hearing.
RECORD LACK OF note and mortgage
39. Here, in the recorded absence of any note and/ormortgage, there was
a. Noagreement;b. Nodebt;c. Nolien;
d. No BankUnited interest.
LACK OF TIMELY NOTICE OF ANY hearing
40. Court staff asserted and published:
A party/attorney scheduling a hearing mustconcurrently notice the matter in
conformance with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and ensure timely notice is served on all pro se parties and counsel of record in advance of the hearing. Theoriginal notice must be timely filed with the Clerk of Court. The Judges and
Magistrates ask that no courtesy copies be sent to their offices on foreclosure cases
only. The setting party/attorney is responsible for preparing and filing the Order of
Referral pursuant to Rule 1.490, Fl. Civil Rules of Court (also can be found at
www.ca.cjis20.org/web/main/magistrates as a reference, no more signed Order of
Referrals from the above website will be accepted). You will be required to submit
your proposed Order of Referral to the appropriate Judge for each hearing in front
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
10/15
10
of the Magistrate. This will include all hearings for 10, 15 or 30 minutes and
Special Set hearings. (This will also include any Summary/Default Judgment
hearings requesting more than 5 minutes.)
Here, no notice was servedon Jennifer Franklin Prescott. Here, nothing, no matter, and no
hearingwere noticedin violation of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.
BANKUNITED, FSBS LACK OFstanding
41. Pursuant to 48.23, Fla. Stat.,
1. A notice oflis pendens must contain the following:
a. The names of the parties.
Here, the fraudulentnotice of lis pendens contained BankUnited, FSB. However here,
said BankUnited was not any note/mortgage holderorparty. Here, U.S. agents had seized
BankUnited, FSB.
42. Furthermore here, Jennifer Franklin-Prescott was mischaracterized as a married woman
and Walter Prescott as her husband. However here, Walter Prescott is not the
husband of Jennifer Franklin Prescott. Here, the notice of lis pendens did not contain the
parties names.
NOjurisdiction
43. Here, BankUnited, FSB was
a. Not anyparty;
b. Had nointerest;c. Had nostanding.
Here, bankrupt BankUnited, FSB, had nostanding, and this Court has nojurisdiction.
RECORD APPEAL - NOjurisdiction
44. Here after disposition and Jennifer Franklin Prescotts Notice of Appeal, this Court had no
jurisdiction:
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
11/15
11
NOTICE OF RELEASE & DISCHARGE OF FRAUDULENT lis pendens, CH. 48, F.S.
45. The fraudulent notice of lis pendens, purported INSTR 4318185, Collier County Records,
has been released and discharged. Here admittedly, no note or mortgage could be
established, Ch. 48, 71, F. S. Purported Plaintiff bankrupt BankUnited failed and was
seized. In the record absence of any note ormortgage, said seized banks fraudulentaction
and notice were null & void and did not operateas a lis pendens, Ch. 48.
46. Furthermore, a lis pendens is not effectual for any purpose beyond 1 year from the
commencement of the action and expires, 48.23, Florida Statutes.
47. Here, the pleadings conclusively proved that no action could befoundedon any lost and/or
destroyed note and/or instrument. Therefore, the bankrupt and seized banks non-
meritorious action not possibly affect the subject property, and the court controlled and
discharged the fraudulent notice oflis pendens, 48.23, Fla. Stat. The Docket showed the
08/12/2010 Final Disposition by Def. Judge Hugh D. Hayes.
08/12/2010 FINAL DISPOSITION, FLA.R.CIV.P. 1.998
48. Hereby, prevailing Jennifer Franklin Prescott filed the Final Disposition Form pursuant to
Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.998, 25.075, Florida Statutes. The Docket evidenced
Judge Hugh D. Hayes 08/12/2010 Final Disposition before any hearing.
49. Here, the Docket and official record alterations were
a. Arbitrary and capricious;b. Unlawful.
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
12/15
12
WHEREFORE, Jennifer Franklin Prescott hereby again demands
1. An Order takingjudicial notice, Ch. 92, Fla. Stat., of Ch. 673, Fla. Stat., and the lawful
seizure [F.D.I.C.] ofbusted BankUnited, FSB;
2. An Order takingjudicial notice of Ch. 673, 59, 90, and 92, Fla. Stat.;
3. An Order sanctioning the attorneys of lawfully seized BankUnited, FSB, for their
unfounded and fraudulentaction;
4. An Orderdirecting judicial imposter Tony Perez to use and disclose his legal name.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND PUBLICATION
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above has been furnished to the
purported non-plaintiff, James E. Albertelli, Erin Quinn Rose, and Erin Rowland, Albertelli Law,
P.O. Box 23028, Tampa, FL 33623, judicial imposter Tony Perez, Magistrates Office, Debbie,
Supervisor, Fax: 239-252-8870, and Defendant Judge Hugh D. Hayes, Naples Courthouse, 3301
E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, on this 3rd
day of September, 2010.
The pleading is also being published worldwide.
________________________
/s/Jennifer Franklin Prescott, Prevailing Victim oflawfully seized BankUniteds record fraud
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
13/15
Home/ Records Search / Court Records / Public Inquiry / Search Results - ALL / Case - 112009CA0060160001XX
New SearchReturn to Case List
Case Information Printer Friendly Version
Style: BANKUNITED vs FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT, JENNIFER
Uniform Case Number: 112009CA0060160001XX Filed: 07/09/2009
Clerks Case Number: 0906016CA
Court Type: CIRCUIT CIVIL Disposition Judge: HAYES, HUGH D
Case Type: MORTGAGE FORECLOSURES Disposed: 08/12/2010
Judge: HAYES, HUGH D Reopen Reason:
Case Status: DISPOSED Reopened:Next Court Date: Reopen Close:
Last Docket Date: 09/02/2010 Appealed:
Parties
Dockets
Events
Financials
1 of 1 pages. Entries per page: 100
Date Text All Entries
07/09/2009 CA48/REAL PRO PERTY MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE (PRE 2010) (FILING)
07/09/2009 CIVIL COVER SHEET
07/09/2009 COMPLAINT
07/09/2009 NOTIC E OF LIS PENDENS
07/09/2009 PAID $10.00 PER ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS $40.00
07/09/2009 REAL PRO PERTY VALUATION SHEET
07/10/2009 SUMMONS ISSUEDJENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT/ WALTER PRESCOTT/ JOHN DOE/ MARY DOE/PLACED IN SOUTH FLORIDA PROCESS SERVERS BIN
09/03/2009 AFFIDAVIT OF NON-SERVICE OF SUMMONS MARY DOE
10/14/2009 AFFIDAVIT OF LOST OR IGINAL SUMMONS JOHN DOE
10/14/2009 AFFIDAVIT OF NON-SERVICE OF SUMMONS JOHN DOE
12/21/2009 AFFIDAVIT OF NON-SERVICE OF SUMMONS WALTER PRESCOTT
12/21/2009 AFFIDAVIT OF NON-SERVICE OF SUMMONS JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT
02/22/2010 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
AS CO-COUNSEL BY ERIN M ROSE QUINN ON BEHALF OF PLT
04/06/2010 ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUEDJENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT/WALTER PRESCOTT/PLACED IN PROVEST LLC BIN
05/20/2010 AFFIDAVIT OF NON-SERVIC E OF SUMMONS JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCO TT
05/20/2010 AFFIDAVIT OF NON-SERVICE OF SUMMONS WALTER PRESCOTT
06/15/2010 COR RESPONDENCE FROM COUNSEL TO CLERK
06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT OF CONSTRUCT IVE SERVICE AS TO WALTER PRESCOTT
06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT OF C ONSTRUCTIVE SERVICE AS TO JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT
06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT OF CONSTRUCTIVE SERVICEAS TO ANY AND ALL UNKNOW N PARTIES CLAIMING
06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT OF DILIGENT SEARCH AS TO WALTER PRESCOTT
06/15/2010 AFFIDAVIT OF DILIGENT SEARCH AS TO JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT
Find it here...
Site Search
Clerk To The Board
Court Departments
Traffic
Recording Department
9/5/2010 Public Inquiry
apps.collierclerk.com//Case.aspx?UC 1
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
14/15
06/15/2010 COR RESPONDENCE FROM C OUNSEL TO GULF COAST BUSINESS REVIEW
06/17/2010 LETTER TO GULF COAST BUSINESS REVIEW
06/17/2010 NOTICE OF ACTIONTO WALTER PRESCOTT/JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT & ANY AND ALL UNKNOWNPARTIES CLAIMING
06/17/2010 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING MAILED 6/18/10
06/18/2010 CONFIRMATION OF EMAIL RECEIVED BY GULF CO AST BUSINESS REVIEW
07/07/2010 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATIONNOTICE OF ACTION TO WALTER PRESCOTT/JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT/ANSWERWITHIN 30 DAYS OF FIRST P UBLICATION 6/25/10
07/09/2010 MOTIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
07/22/2010 NOTICE OF SERVICE MOTION TO DISMISS
07/22/2010 MOTIO N TO DISMISS BY JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT /PRO SE
07/22/2010 MOTIO N TO ENJOIN / BY JENNIFER FRANKLIN-PRESCOTT -PRO SE
07/22/2010 NOTICE OF SERVICEOF PUBLISHED NOTIC E OF RECORD & MOT ION TO DISMISSBY DEFENDANT
07/23/2010 MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION OF COUNSEL
07/23/2010 MOTION TO DISMISS
07/23/2010 MOTIO N TO C LARIFY ALLEGED PLAINTIFFS PUBLISHED NOTICE OF RECORD FRAUD
08/12/2010 MOTIO N TO DISMISS PRO SE JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
08/12/2010 BANKRUPTCY BANKUNITED
08/12/2010 CA48/REAL PRO PERTY MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE (PRE 2010) (DISPOSITION)
08/17/2010 BANKRUPTCY BANKUNITED
08/17/2010 NOTICEOF BANKRUPT BANKUNITED INCIDENT REPORT APPARENT FALSIFICATIONS NOTICE
08/17/2010 NOTIC E OF BANKRUPT BANKUNITED
08/17/2010 NOTIC E OF BANKRUPT BANKUNITED DOCKET ALTERATIONS EVIDENCE
08/17/2010 NOTIC E OF BANKRUPT NON SERVICE NOTIC E
08/17/2010 NOTICEOF BANKRUPT BANKUNITED EMERGENCY DEMAND TO EXTINGUISH FRAUDULENTACTION
08/18/2010 NOTICE OF APPEALFROM ALTERATION OF RECOR D NO O RDER ATTACHEDNO FEES ENCLO SED
08/20/2010 CORR ESPONDENCE FROM
APPEAL CLEERK TO DCA W/NOTICE OF APPEALNO FEE INCLUDED
08/20/2010 BILLED APPEAL FILING FEE $150.00
08/26/2010 NOTIC E OF HEARING 9/2/10 @ 11:30 MOTIO NS TO DISMISS & ENJOIN
08/30/2010 NOTICE OF RELEASE OF LIS PENDENS FILED BY DEFENDANT
08/30/2010 FINAL DISPOSITION FORM
08/31/2010 NOTICEOF RELEASE & DISCHARGE OF FRAUDULENT LIS PENDENS BY DEFENENDANTJENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOT T
08/31/2010 FINAL DISPOSITION FORM BY DEFENDANT
09/01/2010 NOTICE OF SERVICE
09/01/2010 NOTICE OF SERVICE
09/01/2010 DEFENDANT NON CONTEST T O ANY MAGISTRATE
09/01/2010 OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE
09/01/2010 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF HEARING 9/2/10 FILED BY DEFENDANT
09/01/2010 NOTIC E OF RECORDATION OF R ELEASE OF LIS PENDENS
09/01/2010 NOTICE OF SERVICEOF NOTICE OF DISPOSITION AND NON CONTEST TO ANY MAGISTRATE
09/01/2010 OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE
09/02/2010 CANCELLED
09/02/2010 MINUTES - HEARING SEE SCHEDULE MINUTES FOR DETAILS
09/02/2010 RECEIPT FROM DCAACKNOWLEDGMENT OF NEW CASE FILED W/DCA 8/18/10 2D10-4158
09/02/2010 ORDER BY DCAAPPELLANT SHALL WITHIN 15 DAYS SHALL FILE AN AMENDED APPEAL
9/5/2010 Public Inquiry
apps.collierclerk.com//Case.aspx?UC 2
8/8/2019 Lack of Jurisdiction Notice to Circuit & District Courts
15/15
09/02/2010 ORDER BY DCAAPPELLANT SHALL FORWARD FILING FEE OR ORDER OF INSOLVENCY WITTHIN40 DAYS
09/02/2010 ORDER BY DCA APPELLANT SHALL SHOW CAUSE WITHIN 15 DAYS
Wedne sday night is regular ma intenance time on our se rvers; as a result brief outages may occur.We apologize in advance for any inconvenience.
Home | Site Map | Search | Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | FAQs | Contact Us
This website is m aintained by The Collier County Clerk of the Circuit Court. Under Florida law, em ailaddresse s are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a publicrecords request, do not send email to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing.
9/5/2010 Public Inquiry