of 16
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
1/16
AnalyzingHarmoniousand
ObsessivePassionAmongtheYouth
JenniferAnnLajom
CarloMagno
DeLaSalleUniversity-Manila
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
2/16
WhatisPassion? Astronglikingforanacvity,objectorconceptthatis
freelyselected,accommodatedduringleisure
meandfacilitatedbytrialanderrortoarriveat
preferredacvies(Vallerand,2008,2010).
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
3/16
DualiscModelofPassion(DMP) Obsessivepassion(OP):
controlledinternalizaon
Interpersonalorintrapersonalpressure
fromtheaRached
conngenciesofthe
acvity
Harmoniouspassion(HP):autonomous
internalizaon Acknowledges
importanceofanacvity
butwithoutaRaching
conngencies
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
4/16
PassionandAcvityEngagement Autonomy,relatednessandcommitment Identy
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
5/16
esearchObjecves ConfirmthefactorstructureofVallerand's
DMP
Validateatheorecalconceponthatifapersonispassionateaboutanacvity,more
meisspentonit
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
6/16
Methodology Design:QuantaveapproachusingPredicve
Cross-SeconalDesign
Sample:406undergraduatestudents M=18.76yearsold,SD=3.16years Males=117,Females=286,Unidenfied=3
Analysis:StructuralEquaonsModelling
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
7/16
Methodology Instrument:PassionScale(Vallerandetal.,2003)
14itemscalemeasuringOP(=.85)andHP(=.73)with7itemseach
OP:Ihavedifficultyimaginingmylifewithouttheseacvies.
HP:Theacviesallowmetoliveavarietyofexperiences. eportedTimeSpent(inhours)ofinvolvementin
passionateacvity
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
8/16
esults:DescripveStascsVariable Mean StandardDevia9on
ObsessivePassion 4.37 1.39
HarmoniousPassion 5.59 0.985
TimeSpent 9.885 7.879
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
9/16
esults:CorrelaonsVariable Obsessive
Passion
Harmonious
Passion
TimeSpent
Obsessive
Passion
1.0 0.46* 0.52*
Harmonious
Passion0.46* 1.0 0.36*
TimeSpent 0.52* 0.36* 1.0
*p < .05
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
10/16
esults:CFAOneFactorModel
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
11/16
esults:CFAOneFactorModelItemNo. Parameter
Es9mate
Standard
Error(D)
ItemNo. Parameter
Es9mate
Standard
Error(D)
1 0.549 0.092 8 1.454 0.118
2 0.579 0.070 9 1.276 0.102
3 0.629 0.095 10 1.379 0.101
4 0.676 0.093 11 1.283 0.125
5 0.688 0.102 12 0.885 0.161
6 0.641 0.106 13 1.149 0.141
7 0.963 0.123 14 1.193 0.164
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
12/16
esults:CFATwoFactorModel
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
13/16
esults:CFATwoFactorModelItemNo. Parameter
Es9mate
Standard
Error(D)
ItemNo. Parameter
Es9mate
Standard
Error(D)
1H 0.429 0.112 8O 1.297 1.023
2 0.481 0.098 9 1.160 0.825
3 0.497 0.124 10 1.199 0.874
4 0.590 0.132 11 1.128 0.759
5 0.667 0.000 12 0.585 0.000
6 0.656 0.155 13 0.937 0.500
7H 1.210 0.413 14O 1.370 1.140
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
14/16
esults:CFAGoodnessofFitModel
Structure
RMSEA GFI PGI
OneFactor .240 .603 .613
TwoFactor .045 .978 .990
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
15/16
esults:PathAnalysis
Chi-square=112.4 df=5 MSEA=.06 PGI=.91 GFI=.90
8/9/2019 Lajom & Magno
16/16
IMPLICATIONS Timespent:Duraonandfrequency Correlates:AcvityEngagement,Affect,Well-
Being
Identyepresentaon:Acvityselecon,valuaonandinternalizaon