Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

ASHEASHE

LAKE PLEASANT LAKE PLEASANT PARKWAYPARKWAY

DYNAMITE TO SR303LDYNAMITE TO SR303L

CHRIS KMETTY, PEJAN 11, 2011

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

2

LPP: Project Background LPP: Unique Project Aspects Upcoming City Projects PIPS Questions and Answers

Agenda

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

3

Bring necessary infrastructure to the new Loop 303 corridor for future economic development in the area

Project Purpose

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

4

2001 Original Design Concept Report Westwing to SR74 Section north of Westwing was Rural

Jan 2009 Selected PB Team Update DCR and Final Design

Feb 2010 Update to the DCR Completed Westwing to SR74

Sept 2010 Final Design Kick Off Westwing to SR303L

Construction Funded in FY12

Project History/Schedule

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

5

Parkway facility from Westwing Parkway to Loop 303 (four lane interim; six lane ultimate) Median, C & G, sidewalk, bike lanes

Signal: Lake Pleasant and Westwing Parkway New 21” Sewer Line (over 25’ Deep) New 24” Water Line El Paso Gas Line Crossing Enhanced Landscaping Sustainable Road

Project Description

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

6

Typical Section

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

7

Recommended Alignment

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

8

Depth varies from 10’ to 30’ Hard digs and blasting anticipated Sequencing with Maintenance of Traffic Small Percentage of Cost Major

Percentage of Risk

Deep Sewer

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

9

Extend Dry Utilities to 303L to increase economic development potential along 303 Corridor What is chance we are correct…30%?

Dry Utilities Alternatives evaluated by the City All Inclusive “Shovel Ready”: Utilities

Parallel Roadway and Crossings Conduits Parallel to Roadway Conduit Crossings Only at ½ Mile Intervals

Dry Utility Corridor

Alternative CostOption I: All inclusive (conduits, manholes and fiber)

$5M

Option II: Conduits and manholes $2MOption III: Conduits at crossings only $100

K

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

10

What is a Sustainable Road? No Existing Standard

Evaluating GreenRoads vs. Peoria “Brown Roads” FHWA Test Program for Sustainable Highways Conclusion: Sustainable are most of our Best

Practices

Sustainability

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

11

Project Costs Alt. I: CMAR

Alt. II: Low Bid

Alt. III: CMAR/Bid

Combo

Additions During Design StagePreconstruction Services (PS) , Constructability Review (CR), Geotech Work(G)

$ 200,000 (PS) $ 170,000 (CR;G) $ 180,000 (PS;CR)

Construction Estimate (Initial Contract)DBB 10% lower than CMAR (includes All Wish List Items)

$ 33,343,000 $ 29,988,000 $ 32,423,000

Construction Services Post-Design Services $333,000 (1%) $450,000 (1.5%) $467,000 (1.5%)

Change Orders (Owner Contingency) $ 1,000,000 (3%) $3,075,000 (13%) $2,973,000 (8%)

Construction Management $3,335,000 (10%) $ 3,701,000 (12%) $3,567,000 (11%)

Total Construction Services $4,668,000 $7,696,000 $7,107,000

TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS(2% DBB Savings Does not include

Litigation/Geotech Risk) $ 38,211,000 $ 37,384,000 $ 39,610,000

CMAR vs. Low Bid

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

12

Stakeholders MAG/ADOT State Land FCDMC (BLM) CAP (BLM) EPNG

PB Team Ritoch Powell Terracon EcoPlan Corral Dybas Group

Project Team

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

13

Design (FY12) 75th Ave and Cactus: Intersection Improvement 75th Ave and Peoria: Intersection Improvement 91st Ave: Butler to Mountain View: Widening &

Median Underground Overhead Power Lines Study

JOC (Dates TBD) Streets/Paving Minor Concrete

Bids Beardsley and 99th Ave Intersection (Spring 11) Lake Pleasant Parkway (Winter 11)

Upcoming City Projects

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

14

Changes: No Past Performance Scores

References Add Project Understanding and Approach

Length Determined by Project Stay the Same:

Anonymous Project Assessment, Value Add, Schedule Team and Individual Interviews

PIPS: Modifications

Lake Pleasant Parkway Final Design Dynamite to SR303L

QUESTIONS

623-773-7247CHRIS.KMETTY@PEORIAAZ

.GOV

JANUARY 11, 2011