+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Date post: 16-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: dr-stephen-flint-mukalula
View: 230 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
26
2013 -2014 Comparison by Weight Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec - 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000 20,000,000 Weight By Comaprison Axis Title
Transcript
Page 1: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

2013 -2014 Comparison by Weight

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -

2,000,000

4,000,000

6,000,000

8,000,000

10,000,000

12,000,000

14,000,000

16,000,000

18,000,000

20,000,000

Weight By Comaprison

Axis Title

Page 2: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

2013-2014 Comparison by Loads

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

Load By Comparison

Axis Title

Page 3: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Material Recovery 12 to 19th Nov 2014

Plasctic Bot -tles

Scrap Metal Plastics/ Sacks

Boxes/ Paper

Sacks Wood0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

19500

9940

14820 1458012300

4240

2.4 4.4 1.8 2.82 2 3 5

Series 1 Series 2 Series 3

Page 4: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Landfill Data 7th to 14th May 2015

Catron

Zambia Breweries

Citi Mop

Cleanfast

GL carri

ers

Twine Care

Zoom Lion

Rukwa

Zam Leather

WMU trucks

yello

w trucks

Own Transporters

41 6 42 95 46 22 37 34 3 202 34 42175380

38180

254100

496892

229600128020107760 87790

11150

1010720

728120

70770

Comparison ChartLoads Weight

Page 5: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Material Recovery at the Landfill7th to 14 May 2015

Plastics Bottles

39%

Scrap Metal16%Plas

tics 9%

Wood

8%

Sacks14%

Boxes

14%

SalesPlastics Bottles 29060

Scrap Metal 14360

Plastics 16740

Wood 11800

Sacks 15940

Boxes 9200

Page 6: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Landfill Data 7th to 14 May 2015

Catron 3%

Zambia Breweries1%

Citi Mop4%

Cleanfast11%

GL carriers5%

Twine Care3%

Zoom Lion4%

Rukwa7%

Zam Leather

1%

WMU trucks45%

yellow trucks

5%

Own Trans-porters

13%

Comparison Chart

Page 7: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Landfill Data 15th to 19th May 2015

Catron

Citi Mop

GL carr

iers

Zoom Lio

n

Zam Le

ather

yello

w trucks

0200000400000600000800000

10000001200000140000016000001800000

Comparison Chart

LoadsWeight

Page 8: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Landfill Weekly Report 14th Jan to 4th Feb 2015

catrone5%

zambian breweries1%

citimop5%

cleanfast12%

gl carriers9%

twincare2%

zoomlion6%

rukwa7%

zamleather1%

wmu38%

lcc & hired trucks

5%

own transporters10%

Landfill Weeky Records @the Weigh Bridge

Page 9: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Weekly WMU Over View verses Others

catrone5%

zambian breweries1%citimop

5%cleanfast

12%gl carriers

9%

twincare2%

zoomlion6%rukwa

7%zamleather1%

wmu43%

own transporters10%

WMU @ 43 %

Page 10: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Material Flow at the weigh Bridge

4%

96%

Landfil Material Flow

Waste Out Waste In

Page 11: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Material Recovery at Chunga Landfill

Scrap Metal Boxes / Paper Wood Plastic Bottles Sacks

44,260

19,800 13,160

90,920

27,500

Weekly Recycleable MaterialsSeries1

Page 12: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Material Recovery at Chunga Landfill 14th Jan to 4th Feb 2015

Scrap Metal23%

Boxes / Paper10%

Wood7%

Plastic Bottles46%

Sacks14%

Weekly Comparison Data

Page 13: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Landfill Load Data

Catrone9%

Zambian Breweries

1%Citimop Ltd

6%Clean Fast

9%

GL Carriers6%

Twine Care3%

Zoom Lion6%Rukwa

4%Zam Leather5%

WMU24%

Yellow Truck11%

Own Trans-porters

10%

ACKA Gen Dealers2%

Cherishes3%

Loads

Page 14: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Landfill Weight Data Catrone

9%

Zam-bian Breweries4%

Citimop Ltd9%

Clean Fast12%

GL Car-riers5%Twine

Care4%

Zoom Lion3%Rukwa

4%Zam Leather

5%

WMU13%

Yellow Truck18%

Own Trans-porters

6%

ACKA Gen Dealers2% Cherishes

5%

Page 15: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Material recovery report 8th to 14th Oct 2015

Plasctic Bot -tles

Scrap Metal Plastics/ Sacks

Boxes/ Paper

Sacks Wood0

100020003000400050006000700080009000 8120

0

7240

2180

400 0

Series 1

Series 1

Page 16: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Landfill weigh bridge load Data4th to 10th Dec 2014

Catrone5%

Zambian Breweries2%

Citimop Ltd6%

Clean Fast11%

GL Carriers11%

Twine Care3%

Zoom Lion6%Rukwa

2%Zam Leather

1%

WMU35%

Yellow Truck

1%

Own Trans-

porters17%

Loads

Page 17: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Material Recovery 4t to 10th Dec 2104

Plasctic Bot -tles

Scrap Metal Plastics/ Sacks

Boxes/ Paper

Sacks Wood0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

4000034640

8740

18100

26940

7600 9300

2.4 4.4 1.8 2.82 2 3 5

Series 1 Series 2 Series 3

Page 18: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Landfill weigh bridge data 4th to 10th Dec 2014

Catrone8%

Zambian Breweries

2%Citimop Ltd

1%Clean Fast

12%GL Carriers

10%Twine Care

5%Zoom Lion

3%Rukwa1%

Zam Leather1%

WMU49%

Yellow Truck2%

Own Transporters5%

tonnage

Page 19: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Typical Weekly Report Data sheet

Page 20: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Initial Landfill Design 2006

Page 21: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015
Page 22: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015
Page 23: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Picture of Material recovery at the Chunga Landfill

Page 24: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Pictures of the Landfill tipping site

Page 25: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Pictures of the Ladfill at different times of the season

Page 26: Landfill Data Comparison 2013-2015

Recommended