+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New...

Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New...

Date post: 07-Aug-2018
Category:
Upload: 83jjmack
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 14

Transcript
  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    1/32

    Filed 2/18/16

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

    TSVETANA YVANOVA, ))

    Plaintiff and Appellant, )) S218973

    v )) !tApp 2/1 "2#7188

     NE$ !ENT%&Y 'O&T(A(E )!O&PO&ATON et al, )

    ) *+ An-ele !+.nt0efendant and &ep+ndent ) S.pe !t N+ *!97218

     )

    T4e 5+llape in 28 +f t4e 4+.in- .le and it a55+panin- te +f

    4+e l+an e5.itiati+n led, a+n- +t4e 5+ne.en5e, t+ a -eat nati+nal :ave+f l+an defa.lt and f+e5l+.e One ;e le-al i.e aiin- +.t +f t4e 5+llape

    :a :4et4e and 4+: defa.ltin- 4+e+:ne 5+.ld 54allen-e t4e validit +f t4e

    54ain +f ai-nent inv+lved in e5.itiati+n +f t4ei l+an $e -anted evie:

    in t4i 5ae t+ de5ide +ne ape5t +f t4at .eti+n< :4et4e t4e ++:e +n a 4+e

    l+an e5.ed a deed +f t.t a ae an a5ti+n f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e +n

    alle-ati+n a p.p+ted ai-nent +f t4e n+te and deed +f t.t t+ t4e f+e5l+in-

     pat +e defe5t endein- t4e ai-nent v+id

    T4e !+.t +f Appeal 4eld plaintiff Tvetana Yvan+va 5+.ld n+t tate a 5a.e

    +f a5ti+n f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e aed +n an alle-edl v+id ai-nent e5a.e

    4e la5;ed tandin- t+ aet defe5t in t4e ai-nent, t+ :4i54 4e :a n+t a

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    2/32

     pat $e 5+n5l.de, t+ t4e 5+nta, t4at e5a.e in a n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e +nl

    t4e +i-inal enefi5ia +f a deed +f t.t + it ai-nee + a-ent a die5t t4e

    t.tee t+ ell t4e p+pet, an alle-ati+n t4at t4e ai-nent :a v+id, and n+t

    eel v+idale at t4e e4et +f t4e patie t+ t4e ai-nent, :ill .pp+t an

    a5ti+n f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e

    O. .lin- in t4i 5ae i a na+: +ne $e 4+ld +nl t4at a ++:e :4+

    4a .ffeed a n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e d+e n+t la5; tandin- t+ .e f+ :+n-f.l

    f+e5l+.e aed +n an alle-edl v+id ai-nent eel e5a.e 4e + 4e :a

    in defa.lt +n t4e l+an and :a n+t a pat t+ t4e 54allen-ed ai-nent $e d+ n+t

    4+ld + .--et t4at a ++:e a attept t+ peept a t4eatened n+n=.di5ial

    f+e5l+.e a .it .eti+nin- t4e f+e5l+in- pat> i-4t t+ p+5eed N+ d+

    :e 4+ld + .--et t4at plaintiff in t4i 5ae 4a alle-ed fa5t 4+:in- t4e

    ai-nent i v+id + t4at, t+ t4e e?tent 4e 4a, 4e :ill e ale t+ p+ve t4+e

    fa5t N+, finall, in e=e5tin- defendant> a-.ent +n tandin- d+ :e adde

    an +f t4e .tantive eleent +f t4e :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e t+t + t4e fa5t.al

    4+:in- ne5ea t+ eet t4+e eleent

    FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

    T4i 5ae 5+e t+ . +n appeal f+ t4e tial 5+.t> .tainin- +f a

    de.e F+ p.p+e +f evie:in- a de.e, :e a55ept t4e t.t4 +f ateial

    fa5t p+pel pleaded in t4e +peative 5+plaint, .t n+t 5+ntenti+n, ded.5ti+n,

    + 5+n5l.i+n +f fa5t + la: $e a al+ 5+nide atte .=e5t t+ =.di5ial

    n+ti5e @ Evans v. City of Berkeley @26) 38 !al#t4 1, 6)1  T+ deteine :4et4e

    1  T4e .pei+ 5+.t -anted defendant> e.et f+ =.di5ial n+ti5e +f t4ee5+ded deed +f t.t, ai-nent +f t4e deed +f t.t, .tit.ti+n +f t.tee,n+ti5e +f defa.lt and +f t.tee> ale, and t.tee> deed .p+n ale T4e e?iten5eand fa5ial 5+ntent +f t4ee e5+ded d+5.ent :ee p+pel n+ti5ed in t4e tial5+.t .nde Eviden5e !+de e5ti+n #2, .divii+n @5) and @4), and #3 @See Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. @211) 198 !alApp#t4 26, 26#B266)%nde Eviden5e !+de e5ti+n #9, .divii+n @a), n+ti5e t4i 5+.t i t4eef+e

    2

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    3/32

    t4e tial 5+.t 4+.ld, in .tainin- t4e de.e, 4ave -anted t4e plaintiff leave t+

    aend, :e 5+nide :4et4e +n t4e pleaded and n+ti5eale fa5t t4ee i a

    ea+nale p+iilit +f an aendent t4at :+.ld 5.e t4e 5+plaint> le-al

    defe5t + defe5t @Schifando v. City of Los Angeles @23) 31 !al#t4 17#,

    181)

    n 26, plaintiff e?e5.ted a deed +f t.t e5.in- a n+te f+ C#83, +n a

    eidential p+pet in $++dland Dill, *+ An-ele !+.nt T4e lende, and

     enefi5ia +f t4e t.t deed, :a defendant Ne: !ent. '+t-a-e !+p+ati+n

    @Ne: !ent.) Ne: !ent. filed f+ an;.pt5 +n Apil 2, 27, and +n A.-.t

    1, 28, it :a li.idated and it aet :ee tanfeed t+ a li.idati+n t.t

    On 0e5ee 19, 211, a55+din- t+ t4e +peative 5+plaint, Ne: !ent.

    @depite it ealie di+l.ti+n) e?e5.ted a p.p+ted ai-nent +f t4e deed +f

    t.t t+ 0e.t54e "an; Nati+nal T.t, a t.tee +f an invetent l+an t.t t4e

    5+plaint identifie a 'a527 T.tDe1 Pa T4. !etifi5ateG $e ta;e

    n+ti5e +f t4e e5+ded ai-nent, :4i54 i in t4e appellate e5+d @See fn 1,

    ante) A ai-n+ t4e e5+ded d+5.ent lit Ne: !ent.H a ai-nee it lit

    0e.t54e "an; Nati+nal T.t !+pan @0e.t54e "an;) a t.tee f+ t4e

    e-iteed 4+lde +f '+-an Stanle A"S !apital n5 T.t 27DE1 '+t-a-e

    PaT4+.-4 !etifi5ate, Seie 27DE1G @t4e '+-an Stanle invetent

    t.t) T4e ai-nent tate it :a pepaed O5:en *+an Sevi5in-, **!,

    :4i54 i al+ lited a t4e 5+nta5t f+ +t4 ai-n+ and ai-nee and a t4e

    att+ne in fa5t f+ Ne: !ent. T4e ai-nent i dated 0e5ee 19, 211,

    and ea a n+tati+n t4at it :a e5+ded 0e5ee 3, 211

    andat+ $e t4eef+e ta;e n+ti5e +f t4ei e?iten5e and 5+ntent, t4+.-4 n+t +f dip.ted + dip.tale fa5t tated t4eein @See Glaski v. Bank of America @213)218 !alApp#t4 179, 112)

    3

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    4/32

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    5/32

    5+n5l.din- +n eveal -+.nd t4at plaintiff 5+.ld n+t tate a 5a.e +f a5ti+n f+

    .iet title

    T4e !+.t +f Appeal affied t4e =.d-ent f+ defendant +n t4ei de.e

    T4e pleaded 5a.e +f a5ti+n f+ .iet title failed fatall, t4e 5+.t 4eld, e5a.e

     plaintiff did n+t alle-e 4e 4ad tendeed paent +f 4e det T4e 5+.t :ent +n t+

    di5. t4e .eti+n, +n :4i54 it 4ad +.-4t and e5eived iefin-, +f :4et4e

     plaintiff 5+.ld, +n t4e fa5t alle-ed, aend 4e 5+plaint t+ plead a 5a.e +f

    a5ti+n f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e

    On t4e :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e .eti+n, t4e !+.t +f Appeal 5+n5l.ded leave t+

    aend :a n+t :aanted &elin- +n enkins v. !"organ Chase Bank, N.A.

    @213) 216 !alApp#t4 #97 @ enkins), t4e 5+.t 4eld plaintiff> alle-ati+n +f

    ip+pietie in t4e ai-nent +f 4e deed +f t.t t+ 0e.t54e "an; :ee +f n+

    avail e5a.e, a an .nelated t4id pat t+ t4at ai-nent, 4e :a .naffe5ted

    .54 defi5ien5ie and 4ad n+ tandin- t+ enf+5e t4e te +f t4e a-eeent

    alle-edl vi+lated T4e 5+.t a5;n+:led-ed t4at plaintiff> a.t4+it, Glaski v.

     Bank of America, s#$ra, 218 !alApp#t4 179 @Glaski), 5+nfli5ted :it4 enkins 

    +n t4e tandin- i.e, .t t4e 5+.t a-eed :it4 t4e ea+nin- +f enkins and

    de5lined t+ f+ll+: Glaski

    $e -anted plaintiff> petiti+n f+ evie:, liitin- t4e i.e t+ e iefed and

    a-.ed t+ t4e f+ll+:in-< n an a5ti+n f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e +n a deed +f t.t

    e5.in- a 4+e l+an, d+e t4e ++:e 4ave tandin- t+ 54allen-e an ai-nent

    +f t4e n+te and deed +f t.t +n t4e ai +f defe5t alle-edl endein- t4e

    ai-nent v+idJG

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    6/32

    DISCUSSION

    I. Deeds of Trust ad No!ud"#"a$ Fore#$osure

    A deed +f t.t t+ eal p+pet a5tin- a e5.it f+ a l+an tpi5all 4a

    t4ee patie< t4e t.t+ @++:e), t4e enefi5ia @lende), and t4e t.tee

    T4e t.tee 4+ld a p+:e +f ale f t4e det+ defa.lt +n t4e l+an, t4e

     enefi5ia a deand t4at t4e t.tee 5+nd.5t a n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e aleG

    @ Biancalana v. %.&. Service Co. @213) 6 !al#t4 87, 813) T4e n+n=.di5ial

    f+e5l+.e te i dei-ned t+ p+vide t4e lendeenefi5ia :it4 an

    ine?penive and effi5ient eed a-aint a defa.ltin- ++:e, :4ile p+te5tin-

    t4e ++:e f+ :+n-f.l l+ +f t4e p+pet and en.in- t4at a p+pel

    5+nd.5ted ale i final et:een t4e patie and 5+n5l.ive a t+ a +na fide

     p.54ae @ "oeller v. Lien @199#) 2 !alApp#t4 822, 83)

    T4e t.tee tat t4e n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e p+5e e5+din- a n+ti5e +f

    defa.lt and ele5ti+n t+ ell @!iv !+de, K 292#, .d @a)@1))% Afte a

    t4ee+nt4 :aitin- pei+d, and at leat 2 da ef+e t4e 54ed.led ale, t4e

    t.tee a p.li4, p+t, and e5+d a n+ti5e +f ale @KK 292#, .d @a)@2),292#f, .d @)) f t4e ale i n+t p+tp+ned and t4e ++:e d+e n+t e?e5ie

    4i + 4e i-4t +f eintateent + edepti+n, t4e p+pet i +ld at a.5ti+n t+

    t4e 4i-4et idde @K 292#-, .d @a)H enkins, s#$ra, 216 !alApp#t4 at p 9H

     "oeller v. Lien, s#$ra, 2 !alApp#t4 at pp 83B831) (eneall pea;in-, t4e

    f+e5l+.e ale e?tin-.i4e t4e ++:e> detH t4e lende a e5+ve n+

    defi5ien5 @!+de !iv P+5, K 8dH &reyf#ss v. 'nion Bank of California @2)

    2# !al#t4 #, #11)

    T4e t.tee +f a deed +f t.t i n+t a t.e t.tee :it4 fid.5ia +li-ati+n,

     .t a5t eel a an a-ent f+ t4e ++:et.t+ and lendeenefi5ia

    %All f.t4e .npe5ified tat.t+ efeen5e ae t+ t4e !ivil !+de

    6

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    7/32

    @ Biancalana v. %.&. Service Co., s#$ra, 6 !al#t4 at p 819H (o#rnas v. Fidelity

     Nat. %it. )ns. Co. @1999) 73 !alApp#t4 668, 677) $4ile it i t4e t.tee :4+

    f+all initiate t4e n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e, e5+din- fit a n+ti5e +f defa.lt

    and t4en a n+ti5e +f ale, t4e t.tee a ta;e t4ee tep +nl at t4e die5ti+n +f

    t4e pe+n + entit t4at 5.entl 4+ld t4e n+te and t4e enefi5ial inteet .nde

    t4e deed +f t.tLt4e +i-inal enefi5ia + it ai-neeL+ t4at entit> a-ent

    @K 292#, .d @a)@1) Mn+ti5e +f defa.lt a e filed f+ e5+d +nl Mt4e

    t.tee, +t-a-ee, + enefi5iaGH *achlon v. "arko+it @28) 168

    !alApp#t4 316, 33# M:4en ++:e defa.lt +n t4e det, t4e enefi5ia a

    de5lae a defa.lt and a;e a deand +n t4e t.tee t+ 5+en5e f+e5l+.eGH

    Santens v. Los Angeles Finance Co. @19#9) 91 !alApp2d 197, 22 M+nl a pe+n

    entitled t+ enf+5e t4e n+te 5an f+e5l+e +n t4e deed +f t.t)

    0efendant ep4aie, 5+e5tl, t4at a ++:e 5an -eneall aie n+

    +=e5ti+n t+ ai-nent +f t4e n+te and deed +f t.t A p+i+ n+te i a

    ne-+tiale int.ent t4e lende a ell :it4+.t n+ti5e t+ t4e ++:e

    @Creative (ent#res, LLC v. im Ward - Associates @211) 19 !alApp#t4 1#3,

    1##B1##6) T4e deed +f t.t, +e+ve, i inepaale f+ t4e n+te it e5.e,

    and f+ll+: it even :it4+.t a epaate ai-nent @K 2936H Cockerell v. %itle )ns.

    - %r#st Co. @19#) #2 !al2d 28#, 291H '.S. v. %horn#rg @9t4 !i 1996) 82 F3d

    886, 892) n a55+dan5e :it4 t4i -eneal la:, t4e n+te and deed +f t.t in t4i

    5ae p+vided f+ t4ei p+ile ai-nent

    A deed +f t.t a t4. e ai-ned +ne + .ltiple tie +ve t4e life +f t4e

    l+an it e5.e ".t if t4e ++:e defa.lt +n t4e l+an, +nl t4e 5.ent

     enefi5ia a die5t t4e t.tee t+ .ndeta;e t4e n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e p+5e

    MOnl t4e t.e +:ne> + enefi5ial 4+lde> +f a 0eed +f T.t 5an in- t+

    5+pleti+n a n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e .nde !alif+nia la:G @ Barrion#evo v.

    Chase Bank, N.A. @N0!al 212) 88 FS.pp2d 96#, 972H ee /errera v.

    7

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    8/32

     &e#tsche Bank National %r#st Co. @211) 196 !alApp#t4 1366, 1378 Man; and

    e5+nvean5e 5+pan failed t+ etali4 t4e :ee 5.ent enefi5ia and

    t.tee, epe5tivel, and t4eef+e failed t+ 4+: t4e 4ad a.t4+it t+ 5+nd.5t

    t4e f+e5l+.e aleGH 5f '.S. Bank Nat. Assn. v. )ane  @'a 211) 9#1 NE2d

    #, 1 M.nde 'a la:, +nl t4e +i-inal +t-a-ee + it ai-nee a 5+nd.5t

    n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e ale)

    n itelf, t4e pin5iple t4at +nl t4e entit 5.entl entitled t+ enf+5e a det

    a f+e5l+e +n t4e +t-a-e + deed +f t.t e5.in- t4at det i n+t, + at leat

    4+.ld n+t e, 5+nt+veial t i a tai-4tf+:ad appli5ati+nM +f :ell

    etali4ed 5+e5ial and ealp+pet la:< a pat 5ann+t f+e5l+e +n a

    +t-a-e .nle it i t4e +t-a-ee @+ it a-ent)G @*evitin, %he !a$er Chase0

    Sec#ritiation, Foreclos#re, and the 'ncertainty of "ortgage %itle @213) 63 0.;e

    *I 637, 6#) 0e5iin- t4e 5+pi+. liti-ati+n aiin- +.t +f t4e e5ent

    f+e5l+.e 5ii, a pai +f 5+entat+ e?plained< $4ile plent +f .n5etaint

    e?ited, +ne 5+n5ept 5leal ee-ed f+ liti-ati+n d.in- t4e 28212 pei+d<

    in +de t+ f+e5l+e a +t-a-e =.di5ial a5ti+n, +ne 4ad t+ 4ave t4e i-4t t+

    enf+5e t4e det t4at t4e +t-a-e e5.ed t i 4ad t+ ia-ine 4+: t4i n+ti+n

    5+.ld e 5+nt+veialG @$4itan 'ilne, Foreclosing on Nothing0 %he

    C#rio#s !rolem of the &eed of %r#st Foreclos#re Witho#t Entitlement to Enforce

    the Note @213) 66 A; *&ev 21, 23, fn +itted)

    '+e .=e5t t+ dip.te i t4e .eti+n peented 4ee< .nde :4at

    5i5.tan5e, if an, a t4e ++:e 54allen-e a n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e +n t4e

    -+.nd t4at t4e f+e5l+in- pat i n+t a valid ai-nee +f t4e +i-inal lendeJ P.t

    an+t4e :a, d+e t4e ++:e 4ave tandin- t+ 54allen-e t4e validit +f an

    ai-nent t+ :4i54 4e + 4e :a n+t a patJ&  $e p+5eed t+ t4at i.e

    &  S+e:4at 5+nf.in-l, +t4 t4e p.p+ted ai-nee> a.t4+it t+ f+e5l+eand t4e ++:e> ailit t+ 54allen-e t4at a.t4+it 4ave een faed a

    8

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    9/32

    II. Borro'er Stad"( to C)a$$e(e a Ass"(*et as +o"d

    A enefi5ia + t.tee .nde a deed +f t.t :4+ 5+nd.5t an ille-al,

    fa.d.lent + :illf.ll +ppeive ale +f p+pet a e liale t+ t4e ++:e

    f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e @Chave v. )ndymac "ortgage Services @213) 219

    !alApp#t4 12, 162H "#nger v. "oore @197) 11 !alApp3d 1, 7),  A

    f+e5l+.e initiated +ne :it4 n+ a.t4+it t+ d+ + i :+n-f.l f+ p.p+e +f

    .54 an a5ti+n @ Barrion#evo v. Chase Bank, N.A., s#$ra, 88 FS.pp2d at pp

    973B97#H 1hlendorf v. American /ome "ortgage Servicing  @E0!al 21) 279

    F&0 7, 82B83) A e?plained in pat , ante, +nl t4e +i-inal enefi5ia,

    it ai-nee + an a-ent +f +ne +f t4ee 4a t4e a.t4+it t+ int.5t t4e t.tee t+

    initiate and 5+plete a n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e ale T4e .eti+n i :4et4e and

    .eti+n +f tandin-G @See, e-, *evitin, %he !a$er Chase0 Sec#ritiation, Foreclos#re, and the 'ncertainty of "ortgage %itle, s#$ra, 63 0.;e *I at p 6##Mdi5.in- p.p+ted ai-nee> tandin- t+ f+e5l+eGH enkins, s#$ra, 216!alApp#t4 at p 1 M++:e la5; tandin- t+ enf+5e Mai-nenta-eeentG t+ :4i54 4e + 4e i n+t a patH Bank of America Nat. Assn. v. Bassman FB%, LLC @llApp !t 212) 981 NE2d 1, 7 MEa54 pat 5+ntend t4att4e +t4e la5; tandin-G) $e .e t4e te 4ee in t4e latte ene +f a

     ++:e> le-al a.t4+it t+ 54allen-e t4e validit +f an ai-nent

    ,  t 4a een 4eld t4at, at leat :4en ee;in- t+ et aide t4e f+e5l+.e ale,t4e plaintiff .t al+ 4+: pe=.di5e and a tende +f t4e a+.nt +f t4e e5.edindetedne, + an e?5.e +f tende @Chave v. )ndymac "ortgage Services, s#$ra, 219 !alApp#t4 at p 162) Tende 4a een e?5.ed :4en, a+n- +t4e5i5.tan5e, t4e plaintiff alle-e t4e f+e5l+.e deed i fa5iall v+id, aa-.al i t4e 5ae :4en t4e entit t4at initiated t4e ale la5;ed a.t4+it t+ d+ +@ )id.H )n re Cedano @"an; 9t4 !i 212) #7 "& 22, 29B3H Lester v. .!. "organ Chase Bank  @N0!al 213) 926 FS.pp2d 181, 193H Barrion#evo v.

    Chase Bank, N.A., s#$ra, 88 FS.pp2d 96#, 969B97) O. evie: ein- liitedt+ t4e tandin- .eti+n, :e e?pe n+ +pini+n a t+ :4et4e plaintiff Yvan+va.t alle-e tende t+ tate a 5a.e +f a5ti+n f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e .nde t4e5i5.tan5e +f t4i 5ae N+ d+ :e di5. p+tential eedie f+ a plaintiff inYvan+va> 5i5.tan5eH at +al a-.ent, plaintiff> 5+.nel 5+n5eded 4e ee;+nl daa-e A t+ pe=.di5e, :e d+ n+t adde it a an eleent +f :+n-f.lf+e5l+.e $e d+, 4+:eve, di5. :4et4e plaintiff 4a .ffeed a 5+-nialein=. f+ tandin- p.p+e

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    10/32

    :4en a :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e plaintiff a 54allen-e t4e a.t4+it +f +ne :4+

    5lai it ai-nent

    n Glaski, s#$ra, 218 !alApp#t4 179, 19#B19, t4e 5+.t 4eld a

     ++:e a ae a :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e 5lai +n alle-ati+n t4at t4e

    f+e5l+in- pat a5ted :it4+.t a.t4+it e5a.e t4e ai-nent :4i54 it

     p.p+tedl e5ae enefi5ia .nde t4e deed +f t.t :a n+t eel v+idale

     .t v+id "ef+e di5.in- Glaski> 4+ldin- and ati+nale, :e evie: t4e

    ditin5ti+n et:een v+id and v+idale tana5ti+n

    A v+id 5+nta5t i :it4+.t le-al effe5t @&et2d !+nta5t, K 7, 5+ a) t

     ind n+ +ne and i a ee n.llitG @ Little v. CFS Service Cor$ @1987) 188

    !alApp3d 13#, 1362) S.54 a 5+nta5t 4a n+ e?iten5e :4ateve t 4a n+

    le-al entit f+ an p.p+e and neit4e a5ti+n n+ ina5ti+n +f a pat t+ it 5an

    validate it G @Coly v. %itle )ns. and %r#st Co. @1911) 16 !al 632, 6##) A

    :e aid +f a fa.d.lent eal p+pet tanfe in First Nat. Bank of L. A. v. "a2+ell 

    @1899) 123 !al 36, 371, A v+id t4in- i a n+ t4in-> G

    A v+idale tana5ti+n, in 5+ntat, i +ne :4ee +ne + +e patie 4ave

    t4e p+:e, a anifetati+n +f ele5ti+n t+ d+ +, t+ av+id t4e le-al elati+n

    5eated t4e 5+nta5t, + atifi5ati+n +f t4e 5+nta5t t+ e?tin-.i4 t4e p+:e +f 

    av+idan5eG @&et2d !+nta5t, K 7) t a e de5laed v+id .t i n+t v+id in

    itelf @ Little v. CFS Service Cor$, s#$ra, 188 !alApp3d at p 138) 0epite it

    defe5t, a v+idale tana5ti+n, .nli;e a v+id +ne, i .=e5t t+ atifi5ati+n t4e

     patie @&et2d !+nta5t, K 7H Aronoff v. Alanese @NYApp0iv 1982) ##6

     NYS2d 368, 37)

    n Glaski, t4e f+e5l+in- entit p.p+tedl a5ted f+ t4e 5.ent enefi5ia,

    t4e t.tee +f a e5.itied +t-a-e invetent t.t-  T4e plaintiff, ee;in- elief 

    -  T4e +t-a-e e5.itiati+n p+5e 4a een 5+n5iel de5ied af+ll+:< T+ aie f.nd f+ ne: +t-a-e, a +t-a-e lende ell p++l +f

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    11/32

    f+ t4e alle-edl :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e, 5laied 4i n+te and deed +f t.t 4ad

    neve een validl ai-ned t+ t4e e5.itied t.t e5a.e t4e p.p+ted

    ai-nent :ee ade afte t4e t.t> 5l+in- date @Glaski, s#$ra, 218

    !alApp#t4 at pp 182B187)

    T4e Glaski 5+.t e-an it anali +f :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e a-eein- :it4

    a fedeal diti5t 5+.t t4at .54 a 5a.e +f a5ti+n 5+.ld e ade +.t :4ee a

     pat alle-ed n+t t+ e t4e t.e enefi5ia int.5t t4e t.tee t+ file a N+ti5e +f

    0efa.lt and initiate n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e> G @Glaski, s#$ra, 218 !alApp#t4 at

     p 19#, .+tin- Barrion#evo v. Chase Bank, N.A., s#$ra, 88 FS.pp2d at

     p 973) ".t t4e :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e plaintiff, Glaski 5a.ti+ned, .t d+ +e

    t4an aet a la5; +f a.t4+it t+ f+e5l+eH t4e plaintiff .t alle-e fa5t

    4+:Min- t4e defendant :4+ inv+;ed t4e p+:e +f ale :a n+t t4e t.e

     enefi5iaG @Glaski, at p 19#)

    A5;n+:led-in- t4at a ++:e> aeti+n t4at an ai-nent +f t4e n+te

    and deed +f t.t i invalid aie t4e .eti+n +f t4e ++:e> tandin- t+

    54allen-e an ai-nent t+ :4i54 t4e ++:e i n+t a pat, t4e Glaski 5+.t

    5ited eveal fedeal 5+.t de5ii+n f+ t4e p+p+iti+n t4at a ++:e 4a

    tandin- t+ 54allen-e .54 an ai-nent a v+id, t4+.-4 n+t a v+idale @Glaski,

     s#$ra, 218 !alApp#t4 at pp 19#B19) T:+ +f t4ee de5ii+n, C#lhane v.

     A#rora Loan Services of Neraska @1t !i 213) 78 F3d 282 @C#lhane) and

    +t-a-e int+ t.t 5eated t+ e5eive t4e tea +f inteet and pin5ipal paent f+ t4e +t-a-e ++:e T4e i-4t t+ e5eive t.t in5+e i pa5eled int+ 5etifi5ate and +ld t+ invet+, 5alled 5etifi5ate4+lde T4et.tee 4ie a +t-a-e evi5e t+ adinite t4e +t-a-e enf+5in- t4e+t-a-e te and adinitein- t4e paent T4e te +f t4e e5.itiati+nt.t a :ell a t4e i-4t, d.tie, and +li-ati+n +f t4e t.tee, elle, andevi5e ae et f+t4 in a P++lin- and Sevi5in- A-eeent @PSA>)G @ Black3ock Financial "gmt. v. Amac Ass#r. Cor$. @2d !i 212) 673 F3d 169, 173)

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    12/32

     3einagel v. &e#tsche Bank Nat. %r#st Co. @t4 !i 213) 73 F3d 22 @ 3einagel ),

    di5.ed tandin- at +e len-t4H :e :ill e?aine t4e in detail in a +ent

    Glaski ad+pted f+ t4e fedeal de5ii+n and a !alif+nia teatie t4e vie:

    t4at a ++:e 5an 54allen-e an ai-nent +f 4i + 4e n+te and deed +f t.t if 

    t4e defe5t aeted :+.ld void  t4e ai-nentG n+t eel ende it v+idale

    @Glaski, s#$ra, 218 !alApp#t4 at p 19) !ae 4+ldin- t4at a ++:e a

    neve 54allen-e an ai-nent e5a.e t4e ++:e :a neit4e a pat t+ n+ a

    t4id pat enefi5ia +f t4e ai-nent a-eeent paint :it4 t++ +ad a

     .4> G failin- t+ ditin-.i4 et:een v+id and v+idale a-eeent @ )id.,

    .+tin- C#lhane, s#$ra, 78 F3d at p 29)

    T4e Glaski 5+.t :ent +n t+ e+lve t4e .eti+n +f :4et4e t4e plaintiff 4ad

     pled a defe5t in t4e 54ain +f ai-nent leadin- t+ t4e f+e5l+in- pat t4at

    :+.ld, if t.e, ende +ne +f t4e ne5ea ai-nent v+id at4e t4an v+idale

    @Glaski, s#$ra, 218 !alApp#t4 at p 19.) On t4i p+int, Glaski 4eld alle-ati+n

    t4at t4e plaintiff> n+te and deed +f t.t :ee p.p+tedl tanfeed int+ t4e t.t

    afte t4e t.t> 5l+in- date :ee .ffi5ient t+ plead a v+id ai-nent and 4en5e

    t+ etali4 tandin- @Glaski, at pp 196B198) T4i lat 4+ldin- +f Glaski i

    n+t ef+e . On -antin- plaintiff> petiti+n f+ evie:, :e liited t4e 5+pe +f

    +. evie: t+ :4et4e t4e ++:e M4a tandin- t+ 54allen-e an ai-nent +f

    t4e n+te and deed +f t.t +n t4e ai +f defe5t alle-edl endein- t4e

    ai-nent v+idG $e did n+t in5l.de in +. +de t4e .eti+n +f :4et4e a

     p+t5l+in- date tanfe int+ a Ne: Y+; e5.itied t.t i v+id + eel

    v+idale, and t4+.-4 t4e patie> ief adde it, :e e?pe n+ +pini+n +n t4e

    .eti+n 4ee

      T4e vei+n +f 3einagel  5ited in Glaski, p.li4ed at 722 F3d 7, :aaended +n e4eain- and .peeded  3einagel, s#$ra, 73 F3d 22

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    13/32

    &et.nin- t+ t4e .eti+n t4at i ef+e ., :e 5+nide in +e detail t4e

    a.t4+it Glaski elied +n f+ it tandin- 4+ldin- n C#lhane, a 'aa54.ett

    4+e l+an ++:e +.-4t elief f+ 4e n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e +n t4e -+.nd

    t4at t4e ai-nent :4i54 A.+a *+an Sevi5e +f Nea;a @A.+a) 5laied

    a.t4+it t+ f+e5l+eLa tanfe +f t4e +t-a-e f+ '+t-a-e Ele5t+ni5

    &e-itati+n Ste, n5 @'E&S),/ t+ A.+aL:a v+id e5a.e 'E&S neve

     p+pel 4eld t4e +t-a-e @C#lhane, s#$ra, 78 F3d at pp 286B288, 291)

    "ef+e addein- t4e eit +f t4e plaintiff> alle-ati+n, t4e C#lhane 5+.t

    5+nideed A.+a> 5+ntenti+n t4e plaintiff la5;ed tandin- t+ 54allen-e t4e

    ai-nent +f 4e +t-a-e f+ 'E&S t+ A.+a On t4i .eti+n, t4e 5+.t

    fit 5+n5l.ded t4e plaintiff 4ad a .ffi5ient pe+nal ta;e in t4e +.t5+e, 4avin-

    4+:n a 5+n5ete and pe+nalied in=. e.ltin- f+ t4e 54allen-ed

    ai-nent< T4e a5ti+n 54allen-ed 4ee elate t+ A.+a> i-4t t+ f+e5l+e

    vit.e +f t4e ai-nent f+ 'E&S T4e identified 4aLt4e f+e5l+.eL5an

     e ta5ed die5tl t+ A.+a> e?e5ie +f t4e a.t4+it p.p+tedl dele-ated

    t4e ai-nentG @C#lhane, s#$ra, 78 F3d at pp 289B29)

    C#lhane ne?t 5+nideed :4et4e t4e p.dential pin5iple t4at a liti-ant

    4+.ld n+t e peitted t+ aet t4e i-4t and inteet +f an+t4e di5tate t4at

     ++:e la5; tandin- t+ 54allen-e +t-a-e ai-nent a t+ :4i54 t4e ae

    neit4e patie n+ t4id pat enefi5iaie @C#lhane, s#$ra, 78 F3d at p 29)

    T:+ ape5t +f 'aa54.ett la: +n n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e pe.aded t4e 5+.t

    /A t4e C#lhane 5+.t e?plained, 'E&S :a f+ed a 5+n+ti. +f

    eidential +t-a-e lende and invet+ t+ tealine t4e tanfe +f +t-a-el+an and t4ee fa5ilitate t4ei e5.itiati+n A ee lende a nae'E&S a +t-a-ee +n a l+an t4e ee +i-inate + +:nH 'E&S a5t +lela t4e lende> n+inee,G 4avin- le-al title .t n+ enefi5ial inteet in t4e l+an$4en a l+an i ai-ned t+ an+t4e 'E&S ee, 'E&S 5an e?e5.te t4etanfe aendin- it ele5t+ni5 dataae $4en t4e l+an i ai-ned t+ an+nee, 'E&S e?e5.te t4e ai-nent and end it inv+lveent @C#lhane, s#$ra, 78 F3d at p 287)

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    14/32

    .54 a +ad .le i .n:aanted Fit, +nl t4e +t-a-ee @t4at i, t4e +i-inal

    lende + it ai-nee) a e?e5ie t4e p+:e +f ale,0 and t4e ++:e i entitled

    t+ elief f+ f+e5l+.e an .na.t4+ied pat @C#lhane, at p 29) Se5+nd,

    in a n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e t4e ++:e 4a n+ die5t +pp+t.nit t+ 54allen-e t4e

    f+e5l+in- entit> a.t4+it in 5+.t $it4+.t tandin- t+ .e f+ elief f+ a

    :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e, a 'aa54.ett +t-a-+ :+.ld e depived +f a ean

    t+ aet 4e le-al p+te5ti+n G @ )id.) T4ee 5+nideati+n led t4e C#lhane 

    5+.t t+ 5+n5l.de a +t-a-+ 4a tandin- t+ 54allen-e t4e ai-nent +f a

    +t-a-e +n 4e 4+e t+ t4e e?tent t4at .54 a 54allen-e i ne5ea t+ 5+ntet a

    f+e5l+in- entit> tat. .a +t-a-eeG @ )d. at p 291)

    T4e 5+.t iediatel 5a.ti+ned t4at it 4+ldin- :a liited t+ alle-ati+n +f 

    a void  tanfe f, f+ e?aple, t4e ai-n+ 4ad n+ inteet t+ ai-n + 4ad n+

    a.t4+it t+ a;e t4e pati5.la ai-nent, a 54allen-e +f t4i +t :+.ld e

    .ffi5ient t+ ef.te an ai-nee> tat. .a +t-a-eeG @C#lhane, s#$ra, 78 F3d

    at p 291) ".t :4ee t4e alle-ed defe5t in an ai-nent :+.ld ende it eel

    v+idale at t4e ele5ti+n +f +ne pat .t +t4e:ie effe5tive t+ pa le-al title,G t4e

     ++:e 4a n+ tandin- t+ 54allen-e t4e ai-nent +n t4at ai @ )id.)

    n 3einagel , .p+n :4i54 t4e Glaski 5+.t al+ elied, t4e fedeal 5+.t 4eld

    t4at .nde Te?a la: ++:e defendin- a-aint a =.di5ial f+e5l+.e 4ave

    tandin- t+ 54allen-e t4e 54ain +f ai-nent :4i54 a pat 5lai a i-4t

    t+ f+e5l+e> G @ 3einagel , s#$ra, 73 F3d at p 22#) T4+.-4 Te?a la: d+e n+t

    0  'aa54.ett (eneal *a: 54apte 183, e5ti+n 21, iilal t+ +. !ivil

    !+de e5ti+n 292#, p+vide t4at t4e p+:e +f ale in a +t-a-e a e e?e5ied  t4e +t-a-ee + 4i e?e5.t+, adinitat+, .55e+ + ai-nG  On t4e eit, t4e C#lhane 5+.t e=e5ted t4e plaintiff> 5lai t4at 'E&Sneve p+pel 4eld 4e +t-a-e, -ivin- 4e tandin- t+ 54allen-e t4e ai-nentf+ 'E&S t+ A.+a a v+id @C#lhane, s#$ra, 78 F3d at p 291)H t4e 5+.t 4eld'E&S> +le a t4e lende> n+inee all+:ed it t+ 4+ld and ai-n t4e +t-a-e.nde 'aa54.ett la: @ )d. at pp 291B293)

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    15/32

    all+: a n+npat t+ a 5+nta5t t+ enf+5e t4e 5+nta5t .nle 4e + 4e i an

    intended t4idpat enefi5ia, t4e ++:e in t4i it.ati+n ae n+t atteptin-

    t+ enf+5e t4e te +f t4e int.ent +f ai-nentH t+ t4e 5+nta, t4e .-e

    t4at t4e ai-nent ae v+id a initi+G @ )d. at p 22)

    *i;e C#lhane, 3einagel  ditin-.i4ed et:een defe5t t4at ende a

    tana5ti+n v+id and t4+e t4at eel a;e it v+idale at a pat> e4et

    T4+.-4 t4e la: i ettled> in Te?a t4at an +li-+ 5ann+t defend a-aint an

    ai-nee> eff+t t+ enf+5e t4e +li-ati+n +n a -+.nd t4at eel ende t4e

    ai-nent v+idale at t4e ele5ti+n +f t4e ai-n+, Te?a 5+.t f+ll+: t4e

    a=+it .le t4at t4e +li-+ may defend +n an -+.nd :4i54 ende t4e

    ai-nent v+id> G @ 3einagel , s#$ra, 73 F3d at p 22) T4e 5+nta .le

    :+.ld all+: an intit.ti+n t+ f+e5l+e +n a ++:e> p+pet t4+.-4 it i n+t a

    valid pat t+ t4e deed +f t.t + p+i+ n+te G @ )id.)12

     enkins, +n :4i54 t4e !+.t +f Appeal el+: elied, :a de5ided 5l+e in

    tie t+ Glaski @neit4e de5ii+n di5.e t4e +t4e) .t ea54e t4e +pp+ite

    5+n5l.i+n +n tandin- n enkins, t4e plaintiff .ed t+ pevent a f+e5l+.e ale

    t4at 4ad n+t et +55.ed, alle-in- t4e p.p+ted enefi5ia :4+ +.-4t t4e ale

    4eld n+ e5.it inteet e5a.e a p.p+ted tanfe +f t4e l+an int+ a e5.itied

    t.t :a ade in vi+lati+n +f t4e p++lin- and evi5in- a-eeent t4at -+vened

    t4e invetent t.t @ enkins, s#$ra, 216 !alApp#t4 at pp #B)

    12  T4e 3einagel 5+.t n+net4ele e=e5ted t4e plaintiff> 5lai +f an invalidai-nent afte t4e 5l+in- date +f a e5.itied t.t, +evin- t4e 5+.ld n+tenf+5e t4e te +f t.t e5a.e t4e :ee n+t intended t4idpat enefi5iaieT4e 5+.t> 4+ldin- appea, 4+:eve, t+ et at leat in pat +n it 5+n5l.i+n t4ata vi+lati+n +f t4e 5l+in- date :+.ld n+t ende t4e ai-nent v+idG .t eelall+: t4e t+ e av+ided at t4e e4et +f a pat + t4idpat enefi5ia@ 3einagel , s#$ra, 73 F3d at p 228) A di5.ed a+ve in elati+n t+ Glaski,t4at .eti+n i n+t :it4in t4e 5+pe +f +. evie:

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    16/32

    T4e appellate 5+.t 4eld a de.e t+ t4e plaintiff> 5a.e +f a5ti+n f+

    de5laat+ elief :a p+pel .tained f+ t:+ ea+n Fit, enkins 4eld

    !alif+nia la: did n+t peit a peeptive =.di5ial a5ti+nM t+ 54allen-e t4e i-4t,

     p+:e, and a.t4+it +f a f+e5l+in- enefi5ia> + enefi5ia> a-ent> t+

    initiate and p..e f+e5l+.eG @ enkins, s#$ra, 216 !alApp#t4 at p 11)

    &elin- piail +n Gomes v. Co#ntry+ide /ome Loans, )nc. @211) 192

    !alApp#t4 11#9, enkins ea+ned t4at .54 peeptive .it ae in5+nitent

    :it4 !alif+nia> 5+pe4enive tat.t+ 54ee f+ n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.eH

    all+:in- .54 a la:.it :+.ld f.ndaentall .ndeine t4e n+n=.di5ial nat.e

    +f t4e p+5e and int+d.5e t4e p+iilit +f la:.it filed +lel f+ t4e p.p+e

    +f delain- valid f+e5l+.e> G @ enkins, at p 13, .+tin- Gomes at p 11)

    T4i ape5t +f enkins, diall+:in- t4e .e +f a la:.it t+ peept a

    n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e, i n+t :it4in t4e 5+pe +f +. evie:, :4i54 i liited t+ a

     ++:e> tandin- t+ 54allen-e an ai-nent in an a5ti+n ee;in- eedie f+

    +rongf#l foreclos#re A faed t4e p+5eedin- el+:, t4e 5+n5ete .eti+n

    in t4e peent 5ae i :4et4e plaintiff 4+.ld e peitted t+ aend 4e 5+plaint

    t+ ee; ede, in a :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e 5+.nt, f+ t4e t.tee> ale t4at 4a

    alead ta;en pla5e $e d+ n+t adde t4e ditin5t .eti+n +f :4et4e, + .nde

    :4at 5i5.tan5e, a ++:e a in- an a5ti+n f+ in=.n5tive + de5laat+

    elief t+ pevent a f+e5l+.e ale f+ -+in- f+:ad

    Se5+nd, a an altenative -+.nd, enkins 4eld a de.e t+ t4e de5laat+

    elief 5lai :a p+pe e5a.e t4e plaintiff 4ad failed t+ alle-e an a5t.al

    5+nt+ve a e.ied !+de +f !ivil P+5ed.e e5ti+n 16 @ enkins, s#$ra,

    216 !alApp#t4 at p 13) T4e plaintiff did n+t dip.te t4at 4e l+an 5+.ld e

    ai-ned + t4at 4e 4ad defa.lted +n it and eained in aea @ )d. at p 1#)

    Even if +ne +f t4e ai-nent +f t4e n+te and deed +f t.t :a ip+pe in +e

    epe5t, t4e appellate 5+.t ea+ned, Ien;in i n+t t4e vi5ti +f .54 invalid

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    17/32

    tanfeM e5a.e 4e +li-ati+n .nde t4e n+te eained .n54an-ed ntead, t4e

    t.e vi5ti a e an individ.al + entit t4at elieve it 4a a peent enefi5ial

    inteet in t4e p+i+ n+te and a .ffe t4e .na.t4+ied l+ +f it inteet

    in t4e n+teG @ )d. at p 1) n pati5.la, t4e plaintiff 5+.ld n+t 5+plain a+.t

    vi+lati+n +f t4e e5.itied t.t> tanfe .le< A an .nelated t4id pat t+

    t4e alle-ed e5.itiati+n, and an +t4e .e.ent tanfe +f t4e enefi5ial

    inteet .nde t4e p+i+ n+te, Ien;in la5; tandin- t+ enf+5e an

    a-eeent, in5l.din- t4e invetent t.t> p++lin- and evi5in- a-eeent,

    elatin- t+ .54 tana5ti+nG @ )id.)

    F+ it 5+n5l.i+n +n tandin-, enkins 5ited )n re Correia @"an; 1t !i

    211) #2 "& 319 T4e ++:e in t4at 5ae 54allen-ed a f+e5l+.e +n t4e

    -+.nd t4at t4e ai-nent +f t4ei +t-a-e int+ a e5.itied t.t 4ad n+t een

    ade in a55+dan5e :it4 t4e t.t> p++lin- and evi5in- a-eeent @PSA) @ )d. 

    at pp 321B322) T4e appellate 5+.t 4eld t4e ++:e la5;ed tandin- t+

    54allen-e t4e +t-a-e> 54ain +f title .nde t4e PSAG @ )d. at p 32#) "ein-

    neit4e patie n+ t4id pat enefi5iaie +f t4e p++lin- a-eeent, t4e 5+.ld

    n+t 5+plain +f a fail.e t+ aide it te @ )id.)

     enkins al+ 5ited /errera v. Federal National "ortgage Assn. @212) 2

    !alApp#t4 1#9, :4i54 piail addeed t4e merits +f a f+e5l+.e

    54allen-e, 5+n5l.din- t4e ++:e 4ad add.5ed n+ fa5t +n :4i54 t4e 5+.ld

    alle-e an ai-nent f+ 'E&S t+ an+t4e enefi5ia :a invalid @ )d. at pp

    12B16) n ea54in- t4e eit, t4e 5+.t did n+t e?pli5itl di5. t4e

     plaintiff> tandin- t+ 54allen-e t4e ai-nent n a paa-e 5ited in enkins,

    4+:eve, t4e 5+.t +eved t4at t4e plaintiff, in +de t+ tate a :+n-f.l

    f+e5l+.e 5lai, needed t+ 4+: pe=.di5e, and t4e 5+.ld n+t d+ + e5a.e t4e

    54allen-ed ai-nent did n+t 54an-e t4ei +li-ati+n .nde t4e n+te @ /errera, 

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    18/32

    at pp 17B18) Even if 'E&S la5;ed t4e a.t4+it t+ ai-n t4e deed +f t.t,

    t4e t.e vi5ti :ee n+t plaintiff .t t4e lendeG @ )d. at p 18)

    On t4e na+: .eti+n ef+e .L:4et4e a :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e plaintiff

    a 54allen-e an ai-nent t+ t4e f+e5l+in- entit a v+idL:e 5+n5l.de

    Glaski p+vide a +e l+-i5al an:e t4an enkins A e?plained in pat , ante,

    +nl t4e entit 4+ldin- t4e enefi5ial inteet .nde t4e deed +f t.tLt4e +i-inal

    lende, it ai-nee, + an a-ent +f +ne +f t4eeLa int.5t t4e t.tee t+

    5+en5e and 5+plete a n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e @K 292#, .d @a)@1)H

     Barrion#evo v. Chase Bank, N.A., s#$ra, 88 FS.pp2d at p 972) f a p.p+ted

    ai-nent ne5ea t+ t4e 54ain :4i54 t4e f+e5l+in- entit 5lai t4at

     p+:e i a+l.tel v+id, eanin- +f n+ le-al f+5e + effe5t :4at+eve @Coly v.

    %itle )ns. and %r#st Co., s#$ra, 16 !al at p 6##H &et2d !+nta5t, K 7, 5+ a),

    t4e f+e5l+in- entit 4a a5ted :it4+.t le-al a.t4+it p..in- a t.tee> ale,

    and .54 an .na.t4+ied ale 5+ntit.te a :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e @ Barrion#evo v.

    Chase Bank, N.A., at pp 973B97#)

    *i;e t4e 'aa54.ett ++:e 5+nideed in C#lhane, :4+e +t-a-e

    5+ntained a p+:e +f ale all+:in- f+ n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e, !alif+nia

     ++:e :4+e l+an ae e5.ed a deed +f t.t :it4 a p+:e +f ale a

    .ffe f+e5l+.e :it4+.t =.di5ial p+5e and t4. :+.ld e depived +f a ean

    t+ aet Mt4ei le-al p+te5ti+nG if n+t peitted t+ 54allen-e t4e f+e5l+in-

    entit> a.t4+it t4+.-4 an a5ti+n f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e @C#lhane, s#$ra,

    78 F3d at p 29) A ++:e t4eef+e 4a tandin- t+ 54allen-e t4e

    ai-nent +f a +t-a-e +n 4e 4+e t+ t4e e?tent t4at .54 a 54allen-e i

    ne5ea t+ 5+ntet a f+e5l+in- entit> tat. .a +t-a-eeG @id. at p 291)L 

    t4at i, a t4e 5.ent 4+lde +f t4e enefi5ial inteet .nde t4e deed +f t.t

    @A55+d, Wilson v. /SBC "ortgage Servs., )nc. @1t !i 21#) 7## F3d 1, 9 MA

    4+e+:ne in 'aa54.ettLeven :4en n+t a pat t+ + t4id pat enefi5ia

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    19/32

    +f a +t-a-e ai-nentL4a tandin- t+ 54allen-e t4at ai-nent a v+id

     e5a.e .55e +n t4e eit :+.ld p+ve t4e p.p+ted ai-nee i n+t, in fa5t,

    t4e +t-a-ee and t4eef+e la5; an i-4t t+ f+e5l+e +n t4e +t-a-eG)11

     enkins and +t4e 5+.t denin- tandin- 4ave d+ne + patl +.t +f 5+n5en

    :it4 all+:in- a ++:e t+ enf+5e te +f a tanfe a-eeent t+ :4i54 t4e

     ++:e :a n+t a pat n -eneal, !alif+nia la: d+e n+t -ive a pat pe+nal

    tandin- t+ aet i-4t + inteet el+n-in- +lel t+ +t4e1%  @See !+de !iv

    P+5, K 367 Ma5ti+n .t e +.-4t + +n e4alf +f t4e eal pat in inteetH

     asmine Net+orks, )nc. v. S#$erior Co#rt @29) 18 !alApp#t4 98, 992)

    $4en an ai-nent i eel v+idale, t4e p+:e t+ atif + av+id t4e

    tana5ti+n lie +lel :it4 t4e patie t+ t4e ai-nentH t4e tana5ti+n i n+t v+id

    .nle and .ntil +ne +f t4e patie ta;e tep t+ a;e it + A ++:e :4+

    54allen-e a f+e5l+.e +n t4e -+.nd t4at an ai-nent t+ t4e f+e5l+in- pat

     +e defe5t endein- it v+idale 5+.ld t4. e aid t+ aet an inteet el+n-in-

    +lel t+ t4e patie t+ t4e ai-nent at4e t4an t+ 4eelf

    $4en t4e plaintiff alle-e a void  ai-nent, 4+:eve, t4e enkins 5+.t>

    5+n5en :it4 enf+5eent +f a t4id pat> inteet i ipla5ed "++:e :4+

    54allen-e t4e f+e5l+in- pat> a.t4+it +n t4e -+.nd +f a v+id ai-nent

    ae n+t atteptin- t+ enf+5e t4e te +f t4e int.ent +f ai-nentH t+ t4e

    5+nta, t4e .-e t4at t4e ai-nent ae v+id a initi+G @ 3einagel , s#$ra, 73

    11  $e 5ite de5ii+n +n fedeal 5+.t tandin- +nl f+ t4ei pe.aive val.ein deteinin- :4at !alif+nia tandin- la: 4+.ld e, :it4+.t an a.pti+n

    t4at tandin- in t4e t:+ te i identi5al T4e !alif+nia !+ntit.ti+n d+e n+tip+e t4e ae 5ae+5+nt+ve> G liit +n tate 5+.t> =.idi5ti+n aati5le +f t4e %nited State !+ntit.ti+n d+e +n fedeal 5+.t @Grosset v.Wenaas @28) #2 !al#t4 11, 1117, fn 13)1%  n pea;in- +f $ersonal  tandin- t+ .e, :e et aide .54 d+5tine ata?pae tandin- t+ ee; in=.n5tive elief @ee !+de !iv P+5, K 26a) and p.li5 i-4t/p.li5 d.tG > G tandin- t+ ee; a :it +f andate @ee Save the !lastic Bag Coalition v. City of "anhattan Beach @211) 2 !al#t4 1, 166)

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    20/32

    F3d at p 22H a55+d, "r#k v. "ortgage Elec. 3egistration Sys., )nc. @& 213)

    82 A3d 27, 36 M++:e 54allen-in- an ai-nent a v+id ae n+t

    atteptin- t+ aet t4e i-4t +f +ne +f t4e 5+nta5tin- patieH intead, t4e

    4+e+:ne ae aetin- t4ei +:n i-4t n+t t+ 4ave t4ei 4+e .nla:f.ll

    f+e5l+ed .p+nG)

    %nli;e a v+idale tana5ti+n, a v+id +ne 5ann+t e atified + validated

    t4e patie t+ it even if t4e + deie @Coly v. %itle )ns. and %r#st Co., s#$ra,

    16 !al at p 6##H Aronoff v. Alanese, s#$ra, ##6 NYS2d at p 37) Patie t+

    a e5.itiati+n + +t4e tanfe a-eeent a :ell :i4 t+ atif t4e tanfe

    a-eeent depite an defe5t, .t n+ atifi5ati+n i p+ile if t4e ai-nent i

    v+id a initi+ n ee;in- a findin- t4at an ai-nent a-eeent :a v+id,

    t4eef+e, a plaintiff in Yvan+va> p+iti+n i n+t aetin- t4e inteet +f patie t+

    t4e ai-nentH 4e i aetin- 4e +:n inteet in liitin- f+e5l+.e +n 4e

     p+pet t+ t4+e :it4 le-al a.t4+it t+ +de a f+e5l+.e ale T4i, t4en, i n+t

    a it.ati+n in :4i54 tandin- t+ .e i la5;in- e5a.e it +le +=e5t i t+

    ettle i-4t +f t4id pe+n :4+ ae n+t patieG @Golden Gate Bridge etc. &ist.

    v. Felt  @1931) 21# !al 38, 316)

    0efendant a-.e a ++:e :4+ i in defa.lt +n 4i + 4e l+an .ffe n+

     pe=.di5e f+ f+e5l+.e an .na.t4+ied pat, in5e t4e a5t.al 4+lde +f t4e

     enefi5ial inteet +n t4e deed +f t.t 5+.ld e.all :ell 4ave f+e5l+ed +n t4e

     p+pet A t4e enkins 5+.t p.t it, :4en an invalid tanfe +f a n+te and deed

    +f t.t lead t+ f+e5l+.e an .na.t4+ied pat, t4e vi5tiG i n+t t4e

     ++:e, :4+e +li-ati+n .nde t4e n+te ae .naffe5ted t4e tanfe, .t an

    individ.al + entit t4at elieve it 4a a peent enefi5ial inteet in t4e

     p+i+ n+te and a .ffe t4e .na.t4+ied l+ +f it inteet in t4e n+teG

    @ enkins, s#$ra, 216 !alApp#t4 at p 1H ee al+ Siliga v. "ortgage Electronic

     3egistration Systems, )nc. @213) 219 !alApp#t4 7, 8 M++:e 4ad n+

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    21/32

    tandin- t+ 54allen-e ai-nent 'E&S :4ee t4e d+ n+t dip.te t4e ae in

    defa.lt and t4ee i n+ ea+n t+ elieve t4e +i-inal lende :+.ld 4ave

    efained f+ f+e5l+.e in t4ee 5i5.tan5eGH Fontenot v. Wells Fargo

     Bank, N.A., s#$ra, 198 !alApp#t4 at p 272 M:+n-f.l f+e5l+.e plaintiff 5+.ld

    n+t 4+: pe=.di5e f+ alle-edl invalid ai-nent 'E&S a t4e ai-nent

    eel .tit.ted +ne 5edit+ f+ an+t4e, :it4+.t 54an-in- 4e +li-ati+n

    .nde t4e n+teG)

    n de5idin- t4e liited .eti+n +n evie:, :e ae 5+n5ened +nl :it4

     pe=.di5e in t4e ene +f an in=. .ffi5ientl 5+n5ete and pe+nal t+ p+vide

    tandin-, n+t :it4 pe=.di5e a a p+ile eleent +f t4e :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e t+t

    @See fn #, ante) A it elate t+ tandin-, :e dia-ee :it4 defendant> anali +f 

     pe=.di5e f+ an ille-al f+e5l+.e A f+e5l+ed.p+n ++:e 5leal eet

    t4e -eneal tandad f+ tandin- t+ .e 4+:in- an invai+n +f 4i + 4e

    le-all p+te5ted inteet @ Angel#cci v. Cent#ry S#$$er Cl# @27) #1 !al#t4

    16, 17)Lt4e ++:e 4a l+t +:ne4ip t+ t4e 4+e in an alle-edl ille-al

    t.tee> ale @See C#lhane, s#$ra, 78 F3d at p 289 Mf+e5l+ed.p+n ++:e

    4a .ffi5ient pe+nal ta;e in a5ti+n a-aint f+e5l+in- entit t+ eet fedeal

    tandin- e.ieent) '+e+ve, t4e an; + +t4e entit t4at +deed t4e

    f+e5l+.e :+.ld n+t 4ave d+ne + aent t4e alle-edl v+id ai-nent T4.

    Mt4e identified 4aLt4e f+e5l+.eL5an e ta5ed die5tl t+ Mt4e f+e5l+in-

    entit> e?e5ie +f t4e a.t4+it p.p+tedl dele-ated t4e ai-nentG

    @C#lhane, at p 29)

     N+ i it 5+e5t t4at t4e ++:e 4a n+ 5+-niale inteet in t4e identit +f 

    t4e pat enf+5in- 4i + 4e det T4+.-4 t4e ++:e i n+t entitled t+ +=e5t

    t+ an ai-nent +f t4e p+i+ n+te, 4e + 4e i +li-ated t+ pa t4e det, +

    .ffe l+ +f t4e e5.it, +nl t+ a pe+n + entit t4at 4a a5t.all een ai-ned

    t4e det @See Cockerell v. %itle )ns. - %r#st Co., s#$ra,  #2 !al2d at p 292 Mpat

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    22/32

    5laiin- .nde an ai-nent .t p+ve fa5t +f ai-nent) T4e ++:e

    +:e +ne n+t t+ t4e :+ld at la-e .t t+ a pati5.la pe+n + intit.ti+n, and

    +nl t4e pe+n + intit.ti+n entitled t+ paent a enf+5e t4e det

    f+e5l+in- +n t4e e5.it

    t i n+ ee p+5ed.al ni5et,G f+ a 5+nta5t.al p+int +f vie:, t+ init

    t4at +nl t4+e :it4 a.t4+it t+ f+e5l+e +n a ++:e e peitted t+ d+ +

    @*evitin, %he !a$er Chase0 Sec#ritiation, Foreclos#re, and the 'ncertainty of

     "ortgage %itle, s#$ra, 63 0.;e *I at p 6) S.54 a vie: f.ndaentall

    i.ndetand t4e +t-a-e 5+nta5t T4e +t-a-e 5+nta5t i n+t ipl an

    a-eeent t4at t4e 4+e a e +ld .p+n a defa.lt +n t4e l+an ntead, it i an

    a-eeent t4at if t4e 4+e+:ne defa.lt +n t4e l+an, the mortgagee a ell t4e

     p+pet p..ant t+ t4e e.iite le-al p+5ed.eG @ )id , itali5 added and

    +itted.)

    T4e l+-i5 +f defendant> n+pe=.di5e a-.ent iplie t4at anyone, even a

    tan-e t+ t4e det, 5+.ld de5lae a defa.lt and +de a t.tee> aleLand t4e

     ++:e :+.ld e left :it4 n+ e5+.e e5a.e, afte all, 4e + 4e +:ed t4e det

    t+ someone, t4+.-4 n+t t+ t4e f+e5l+in- entit T4i :+.ld e an +dd e.ltG

    indeed @ 3einagel , s#$ra, 73 F3d at p 22) A a diti5t 5+.t +eved in

    e=e5tin- t4e n+pe=.di5e a-.ent, Man; ae neit4e pivate att+ne -eneal

    n+ +.nt 4.nte, aed :it4 a +vin- 5+ii+n t+ ee; +.t defa.ltin-

    4+e+:ne and ta;e a:a t4ei 4+e in atifa5ti+n +f +e +t4e an;> deed

    +f t.tG @ "iller v. /omecomings Financial, LLC  @S0Te? 212) 881 FS.pp2d

    82, 832)

    0efendant n+te 5+e5tl t4at a plaintiff in Yvan+va> p+iti+n, 4avin-

    .ffeed an alle-edl .na.t4+ied n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e +f 4e 4+e, need n+t

    n+: fea an+t4e 5edit+ 5+in- f+:ad t+ 5+lle5t t4e det T4e 4+e 5an +nl

     e f+e5l+ed +n5e, and t4e t.tee> ale e?tin-.i4e t4e det @!+de !iv P+5,

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    23/32

    K 8dH &reyf#ss v. 'nion Bank of California, s#$ra, 2# !al#t4 at p #11) ".t a

    t4e Att+ne (eneal p+int +.t in 4e ai5. 5.iae ief, a 4+ldin- t4at anyone 

    a f+e5l+e +n a defa.ltin- 4+e l+an ++:e :+.ld .ltipl t4e i; f+

    4+e+:ne t4at t4e i-4t fa5e a f+e5l+.e at +e p+int in t4e life +f t4ei

    l+an T4e p+iilit t4at .ltiple patie 5+.ld ea54 f+e5l+e at +e tie, t4at

    i, in5eae t4e ++:e> +veall i; +f f+e5l+.e

    0efendant .--et t4at t+ etali4 pe=.di5e t4e plaintiff .t alle-e and

     p+ve t4at t4e t.e enefi5ia .nde t4e deed +f t.t :+.ld 4ave efained f+

    f+e5l+in- +n t4e plaintiff> p+pet $4ateve eit t4i .le :+.ld 4ave a t+

     pe=.di5e a an eleent +f t4e :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e t+t, it itate t4e tpe +f

    in=. e.ied f+ tandin- A 4+e+:ne :4+ 4a een f+e5l+ed +n +ne

    :it4 n+ i-4t t+ d+ + 4a .ffeed an in=.i+. invai+n +f 4i + 4e le-al i-4t at

    t4e f+e5l+in- entit> 4and N+ +e i e.ied f+ tandin- t+ .e

    @ Angel#cci v. Cent#ry S#$$er Cl#, s#$ra, #1 !al#t4 at p 17)

     Neit4e Ca#lfield v. Sanders @1861) 17 !al 69 n+ Seidell v. %#2edo Land

    Co. @1932) 216 !al 16, .p+n :4i54 defendant el, 4+ld + iplie a 4+e

    l+an ++:e a n+t 54allen-e a f+e5l+.e alle-in- a v+id ai-nent n

    t4e fit +f t4ee 5ae, :e 4eld a det+ +n a 5+nta5t f+ pintin- and advetiin-

    5+.ld n+t defend a-aint 5+lle5ti+n +f t4e det +n t4e -+.nd it 4ad een ai-ned

    :it4+.t p+pe 5+n.ltati+n a+n- t4e ai-nin- patne and f+ n+inal

    5+nideati+n< t i +f n+ 5+ne.en5e t+ t4e defendant, a it in n+ epe5t affe5t

    4i liailit, :4et4e t4e tanfe :a ade at +ne tie + an+t4e, + :it4 +

    :it4+.t 5+nideati+n, + +ne + all t4e ee +f t4e fiG @Ca#lfield v.

    Sanders, at p 72) n t4e e5+nd, :e 4eld land+:ne ee;in- t+ en=+in a

    f+e5l+.e +n a deed +f t.t t+ t4ei land 5+.ld n+t d+ + 54allen-in- t4e

    validit +f an ai-nent +f t4e p+i+ n+te t4e deed +f t.t e5.ed

    @Seidell v. %#2edo Land Co., at pp 166, 169B17) $e e?plained t4at t4e

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    24/32

    ai-nent :a ade an a-ent +f t4e enefi5ia, and t4at depite t4e

    land+:ne> 5lai t4e a-ent la5;ed a.t4+it f+ t4e ai-nent, t4e enefi5ia

    i n+t n+: 5+plainin-G @ )d. at p 17) Neit4e de5ii+n di5.e t4e

    ditin5ti+n et:een alle-edl v+id and eel v+idale, and neit4e ne-ate a

     ++:e> ailit t+ 54allen-e an ai-nent +f 4i + 4e det a v+id

    F+ t4ee ea+n, :e 5+n5l.de Glaski, s#$ra, 218 !alApp#t4 179, :a

    5+e5t t+ 4+ld a :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e plaintiff 4a tandin- t+ 5lai t4e

    f+e5l+in- entit> p.p+ted a.t4+it t+ +de a t.tee> ale :a aed +n a

    v+id ai-nent +f t4e n+te and deed +f t.t  enkins, s#$ra, 216 !alApp#t4

    #97, p+;e t++ +adl in 4+ldin- a ++:e la5; tandin- t+ 54allen-e an

    ai-nent +f t4e n+te and deed +f t.t t+ :4i54 t4e ++:e :a neit4e a pat

    n+ a t4id pat enefi5ia  enkins> .le a 4+ld a t+ 5laied defe5t t4at

    :+.ld a;e t4e ai-nent eel v+idale, .t n+t a t+ alle-ed defe5t

    endein- t4e ai-nent a+l.tel v+id1&

    n ea5in- Glaski> .le t4at ++:e 4ave tandin- t+ 54allen-e

    ai-nent a v+id, .t n+t a v+idale, :e =+in eveal 5+.t a+.nd t4e nati+n

    @Wilson v. /SBC "ortgage Servs., )nc., s#$ra, 7## F3d at p 9H 3einagel , s#$ra,

    73 F3d at pp 22#B22H Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. @1t !i 213) 733 F3d

    3#9, 3#H C#lhane, s#$ra, 78 F3d at pp 289B291H "iller v. /omecomings

     Financial, LLC , s#$ra, 881 FS.pp2d at pp 831B832H Bank of America Nat. Assn.

    v. Bassman FB%, LLC , s#$ra, 981 NE2d at pp 7B8H !ike v. &e#tsche Bank Nat.

    %r#st Co. @ND 21) 121 A3d 279, 281H "r#k v. "ortgage Elec. 3egistration

    1&  $e diapp+ve enkins v. !"organ Chase Bank, N.A., s#$ra, 216!alApp#t4 #97, Siliga v. "ortgage Electronic 3egistration Systems, )nc., s#$ra,219 !alApp#t4 7, Fontenot v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., s#$ra, 198 !alApp#t426, and /errera v. Federal National "ortgage Assn., s#$ra, 2 !alApp#t41#9, t+ t4e e?tent t4e 4eld ++:e la5; tandin- t+ 54allen-e an ai-nent+f t4e deed +f t.t a v+id

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    25/32

    Sys., )nc., s#$ra, 82 A3d at pp 3#B36H &ernier v. "ortgage Net+ork, )nc. @Vt

    213) 87 A3d #6, #73) ndeed, a 5+entat+ +n t4e i.e 4ave tated<

    M!+.t -eneall peit 54allen-e t+ ai-nent if .54 54allen-e :+.ld

     p+ve t4at t4e ai-nent :ee v+id a +pp+ed t+ v+idaleG @Qa5; Qa5;,

     Not a !arty0 Challenging "ortgage Assignments @21#) 9 St *+.i % *I 17,

    18)

    T4at eveal fedeal 5+.t applin- !alif+nia la: 4ave, la-el in

    .nep+ted de5ii+n, a-eed :it4 enkins and de5lined t+ f+ll+: Glaski d+e n+t

    alte +. 5+n5l.i+n Neit4e *han v. 3econtr#st Co. @N0!al 21) 81

    FS.pp3d 867 n+ Flores v. E"C "ort. Co. @E0!al 21#) 997 FS.pp2d 188

    add .54 t+ t4e di5.i+n n *han, t4e diti5t 5+.t f+.nd t4e ++:e, a a

    n+npat t+ t4e p++lin- and evi5in- a-eeent, la5;ed tandin- t+ 54allen-e a

    f+e5l+.e +n t4e ai +f an .npe5ified fla: in t4e l+an> e5.itiati+nH t4e

    5+.t> +pini+n d+e n+t di5. t4e ditin5ti+n et:een a v+id ai-nent and a

    eel v+idale +ne @ *han v. 3econtr#st Co., s#$ra, 81 FS.pp3d at pp 872B 

    873) n Flores, t4e diti5t 5+.t, 5+nidein- a :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e 5+plaint

    t4at la5;ed .ffi5ient 5lait in it alle-ati+n in5l.din- identifi5ati+n +f t4e

    ai-nent + ai-nent 54allen-ed, t4e diti5t 5+.t .+ted and f+ll+:ed

     enkins> ea+nin- +n t4e ++:e> la5; +f tandin- t+ enf+5e an a-eeent t+

    :4i54 4e + 4e i n+t a pat, :it4+.t addein- t4e appli5ati+n +f t4i ea+nin-

    t+ alle-edl v+id ai-nent @ Flores v. E"C "ort. Co., s#$ra, at pp 113B 

    11)

    Siilal, t4e .nep+ted fedeal de5ii+n applin- !alif+nia la: la-el

    fail t+ -apple :it4 Glaski> ditin5ti+n et:een v+id and v+idale ai-nent

    and tend eel t+ epeat enkins> a-.ent t4at a ++:e, a a n+npat t+ an

    ai-nent, a n+t enf+5e it te and 5ann+t 4+: pe=.di5e :4en in defa.lt

    +n t4e l+an, a-.ent :e 4ave f+.nd in.ffi5ient :it4 e-ad t+ alle-ati+n +f

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    26/32

    v+id ai-nent $4ile .nep+ted fedeal 5+.t de5ii+n a e 5ited in

    !alif+nia a pe.aive a.t4+it @ *an v. G#ild "ortgage Co. @21#) 23

    !alApp#t4 736, 7##, fn 3), in t4i intan5e t4e la5; pe.aive val.e

    0efendant 5ite t4e de5ii+n in 3a4amin v. &e#tsche Bank Nat. %r#st Co. @2nd

    !i 21#) 77 F3d 79 @ 3a4amin), a a e.;eG +f Glaski  3a4amin> e?peed

    dia-eeent :it4 Glaski, 4+:eve, :a +n t4e .eti+n :4et4e, .nde Ne: Y+; 

    la:, an ai-nent t+ a e5.itied t.t ade afte t4e t.t> 5l+in- date i v+id

    + eel v+idale @ 3a4amin, at p 9) A e?plained ealie, t4at .eti+n i

    +.tide t4e 5+pe +f +. evie: and :e e?pe n+ +pini+n a t+ Glaski>

    5+e5tne +n t4e p+int

    T4e 3a4amin 5+.t did, in an ealie di5.i+n, tate -eneall t4at ++:e

    la5; tandin- t+ 54allen-e an ai-nent a vi+lative +f t4e e5.itied t.t>

     p++lin- and evi5in- a-eeent @ 3a4amin, s#$ra, 77 F3d at pp 8B86), .t t4e

    5+.t in t4at p+ti+n +f it anali did n+t ditin-.i4 et:een v+id and v+idale

    ai-nent n a late p+ti+n +f it anali, t4e 5+.t a.Med t4at tandin-

    e?it f+ 54allen-e t4at 5+ntend t4at t4e ai-nin- pat neve p+eed le-al

    title,> G a defe5t t4e plaintiff 5laied ade t4e ai-nent v+id @id. at p 9), .t

    5+n5l.ded t4e plaintiff 4ad n+t p+pel alle-ed fa5t t+ .pp+t t4ei v+idne

    t4e+ @id. at pp 9B91)

     N+ d+ *an v. G#ild "ortgage Co., s#$ra, 23 !alApp#t4 736, and Siliga v.

     "ortgage Electronic 3egistration Systems, )nc., s#$ra, 219 !alApp#t4 7

    @Siliga), :4i54 defendant al+ 5ite, pe.ade . Glaski eed in findin- ++:e

    tandin- t+ 54allen-e an ai-nent a v+id T4e *an 5+.t ditin-.i4ed Glaski 

    a inv+lvin- a p+tale :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e 5lai, a +pp+ed t+ t4e peeptive

    .it inv+lved in enkins and *an itelf @ *an, at pp 7#3B7##) On tandin-, t4e

     *an 5+.t n+ted t4e fedeal 5iti5i +f Glaski and +. -ant +f evie: in t4e

     peent 5ae, .t f+.nd n+ ea+n t+ :ade int+ t4e i.e +f :4et4e Glaski :a

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    27/32

    5+e5tl de5ided, e5a.e t4e +pini+n 4a n+ die5t appli5ailit t+ t4i

     pef+e5l+.e a5ti+nG @ *an, at p 7#)

    Siliga, iilal, f+ll+:ed enkins in diapp+vin- a peeptive la:.it

    @Siliga, s#$ra, 219 !alApp#t4 at p 82) $it4+.t di5.in- Glaski, t4e Siliga 

    5+.t al+ 4eld t4e ++:e plaintiff failed t+ 4+: an pe=.di5e f+, and

    t4eef+e la5;ed tandin- t+ 54allen-e, t4e ai-nent +f t4ei deed +f t.t t+ t4e

    f+e5l+in- entit @Siliga, at p 8) A alead e?plained, t4i pe=.di5e anali

    ie t4e a; in t4e :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e 5+nte?t $4en a p+pet 4a een

    +ld at a t.tee> ale at t4e die5ti+n +f an entit :it4 n+ le-al a.t4+it t+ d+ +,

    t4e ++:e 4a .ffeed a 5+-niale in=.

    n f.t4e .pp+t +f a ++:e> tandin- t+ 54allen-e t4e f+e5l+in-

     pat> a.t4+it, plaintiff p+int t+ p+vii+n +f t4e e5ent le-ilati+n ;n+:n a

    t4e !alif+nia D+e+:ne "ill +f &i-4t, ena5ted in 212 and effe5tive +nl afte

    t4e t.tee> ale in t4i 5ae @See Le#ras v. BAC /ome Loans Servicing, L!  

    @213) 221 !alApp#t4 #9, 86, fn 1#)1,  Davin- 5+n5l.ded :it4+.t efeen5e t+

    t4i le-ilati+n t4at ++:e d+ 4ave tandin- t+ 54allen-e an ai-nent a

    1,  Plaintiff 5ite ne:l added p+vii+n t4at p+4iit an entit f+initiatin- a f+e5l+.e p+5e .nle it i t4e 4+lde +f t4e enefi5ial inteet.nde t4e +t-a-e + deed +f t.t, t4e +i-inal t.tee + t4e .tit.ted t.tee.nde t4e deed +f t.t, + t4e dei-nated a-ent +f t4e 4+lde +f t4e enefi5ialinteetG @K 292#, .d @a)@6))H e.ie t4e l+an evi5e t+ inf+ t4e ++:e, ef+e a n+ti5e +f defa.lt i filed, +f t4e ++:e> i-4t t+ e.et 5+pie +f an

    ai-nent +f t4e deed +f t.t e.ied t+ de+ntate t4e i-4t +f t4e +t-a-eevi5e t+ f+e5l+eG @K 2923, .d @)@1)@")@iii))H and e.ie t4e evi5e t+en.e t4e d+5.entati+n .tantiate t4e i-4t t+ f+e5l+e @K 292#17, .d@)) T4e le-ilative 4it+ indi5ate t4e additi+n +f t4ee p+vii+n :a p+pted in pat ep+t t4at n+n=.di5ial f+e5l+.e p+5eedin- :ee ein-initiated +n e4alf +f 5+panie :it4 n+ a.t4+it t+ f+e5l+e @See Sen &.le!+, !+nfeen5e &ep +n Sen "ill N+ 9 @211B212 &e- Se) a aendedI.ne 27, 212, p 26)

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    28/32

    v+id, :e need n+t de5ide :4et4e t4e ne: p+vii+n p+vide additi+nal .pp+t

    f+ t4at 4+ldin-

    Plaintiff 4a alle-ed t4at 4e deed +f t.t :a ai-ned t+ t4e '+-an Stanle

    invetent t.t in 0e5ee 211, eveal ea afte +t4 t4e e5.itied t.t>

    5l+in- date and Ne: !ent.> li.idati+n in an;.pt5, a defe5t plaintiff 5lai

    ende t4e ai-nent v+id "e+nd t4ei -eneal 5lai a ++:e 4a n+

    tandin- t+ 54allen-e an ai-nent +f t4e deed +f t.t, defendant a;e eveal

    a-.ent a-aint all+:in- plaintiff t+ plead a 5a.e +f a5ti+n f+ :+n-f.l

    f+e5l+.e aed +n t4i alle-edl v+id ai-nent

    Pin5ipall, defendant a-.e t4e 0e5ee 211 ai-nent +f t4e deed +f

    t.t t+ 0e.t54e "an;, a t.tee f+ t4e invetent t.t, :a eel

    5+nfiat+G +f a 27 ai-nent t4at 4ad een e?e5.ted in lan; @ie, :it4+.t

    dei-nati+n +f ai-nee) :4en t4e l+an :a added t+ t4e t.t> invetent p++l

    T4e p.p+e +f t4e 211 e5+ded ai-nent, defendant aet, :a eel t+

    5+pl :it4 a e.ieent in t4e t.t> p++lin- and evi5in- a-eeent t4at

    d+5.ent e e5+ded ef+e f+e5l+.e ae initiated An ai5. 5.iae

    .pp+tin- defendant> p+iti+n aet t4at t4e -eneal pa5ti5e in 4+e l+an

    e5.itiati+n i t+ initiall e?e5.te ai-nent +f l+an and +t-a-e + deed

    +f t.t t+ t4e t.tee in lan; and n+t t+ e5+d t4eH t4e +t-a-e + deed +f t.t

    i .e.entl end+ed t4e t.tee and e5+ded if and :4en tate la:

    e.ie @See 3a4amin, s#$ra, 77 F3d at p 91) T4i 5lai, :4i54 -+e n+t t+

    t4e le-al i.e +f a ++:e> tandin- t+ .e f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e aed +n a

    v+id ai-nent, .t at4e t+ t4e fa5t.al .eti+n +f :4en t4e ai-nent in t4i

    5ae :a a5t.all ade, i +.tide t4e liited 5+pe +f +. evie: T4e ae i

    t.e +f defendant> eainin- fa5t.al 5lai, in5l.din- t4at t4e te?t +f t4e

    invetent t.t> p++lin- and evi5in- a-eeent de+ntate plaintiff> deed

    +f t.t :a ai-ned t+ t4e t.t ef+e it 5l+ed

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    29/32

    CONCLUSION

    $e 5+n5l.de a 4+e l+an ++:e 4a tandin- t+ 5lai a n+n=.di5ial

    f+e5l+.e :a :+n-f.l e5a.e an ai-nent :4i54 t4e f+e5l+in- pat

     p.p+tedl t++; a enefi5ial inteet in t4e deed +f t.t :a n+t eel v+idale

     .t v+id, depivin- t4e f+e5l+in- pat +f an le-itiate a.t4+it t+ +de a

    t.tee> ale T4e !+.t +f Appeal t++; t4e +pp+ite vie: and, +lel +n t4at

     ai, 5+n5l.ded plaintiff 5+.ld n+t aend 4e +peative 5+plaint t+ plead a

    5a.e +f a5ti+n f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e $e .t t4eef+e evee t4e !+.t +f

    Appeal> =.d-ent and all+: t4at 5+.t t+ e5+nide t4e .eti+n +f an

    aendent t+ plead :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e $e e?pe n+ +pini+n +n :4et4e

     plaintiff 4a alle-ed fa5t 4+:in- a v+id ai-nent, + +n an +t4e i.e

    elevant t+ 4e ailit t+ tate a 5lai f+ :+n-f.l f+e5l+.e

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    30/32

    DISPOSITION 

    T4e =.d-ent +f t4e !+.t +f Appeal i eveed and t4e atte i eanded

    t+ t4at 5+.t f+ f.t4e p+5eedin- 5+nitent :it4 +. +pini+n

    3ERDEGAR 4 5.

    3E CONCUR 6

    CANTIL7SAKAU8E4 C. 5.

    CORRIGAN4 5.LIU4 5.CU9LLAR 4 5.K RUGER 4 5.HUFFMAN4 5.:

    :  A+5iate I.ti5e +f t4e !+.t +f Appeal, F+.t4 Appellate 0iti5t,0ivii+n One, ai-ned t4e !4ief I.ti5e p..ant t+ ati5le V, e5ti+n 6 +f t4e!alif+nia !+ntit.ti+n

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    31/32

    See ne2t $age for addresses and tele$hone n#mers for co#nsel +ho arg#ed in S#$reme Co#rt.

    Na*e of O;""o Yvan+va v Ne: !ent. '+t-a-e !+p+ati+n 

  • 8/20/2019 Landmark Decision for Homeowners Feb. 2016 from the California Supreme Court in Yvanova v. New Century ap…

    32/32

    Couse$ ')o ar(ued " Su;re*e Court @ot "teded for ;u=$"#at"o '"t) o;""o6

    &i54ad * Ant+-nini*a: Offi5e +f &i54ad * Ant+-nini236 Nevada !it Di-4:a, S.ite 636(a Valle, !A 99#77@916) 29#896

    ennet4 *ee 'a4all"an !ave6 'ii+n Steet, S.ite 2San Fan5i5+, !A 9#1@#1) 673#


Recommended