+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Lasers and aviation Safety

Lasers and aviation Safety

Date post: 21-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: debra
View: 31 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Patrick Murphy Executive Director, International Laser Display Association SAE G-10T Committee Member. Lasers and aviation Safety. Lasers and Aviation Safety. Laser pointer threat Laser uses in airspace Laser hazards in airspace Hazard factors Hazard reduction Regulation and control. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
57
Patrick Murphy Executive Director, International Laser Display Association SAE G-10T Committee Member
Transcript
Page 1: Lasers and aviation Safety

Patrick MurphyExecutive Director, International Laser Display Association

SAE G-10T Committee Member

Page 2: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Laser pointer threat• Laser uses in airspace• Laser hazards in airspace

o Hazard factorso Hazard reduction

• Regulation and control

Page 3: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Steady rise in incidents

• Due to:o Lower costo Higher powers

(100-300 mW)o Green (more visible)

Page 4: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• January 1 – February 23, 2009: 148 laser illuminations of aircraft in the U.S. aloneo 2.7 per day

• February 22: 12 illuminations of aircraft landing at Sea-Tac

Page 5: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• 140 incidents Jan. - April 2008

• March 2008 “coordinated attacks” in Sydney

• Led to NSW ban on laser pointer import, sales and possession

Page 6: Lasers and aviation Safety

Why not ban laser beams from airspace?

Page 7: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• “Guide star” lasers used in astronomy

• Satellite communications and ranging

• Atmospheric remote sensing

Page 8: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Aircraft warningo Visual Warning System used in Washington

Metropolitan Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ)

o 7 locationso Green and red lasers, 1.5 wattso Visible up to 20 nautical miles away

Page 9: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

Page 10: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Entertainmento Nightly show at a fixed site (theme parks)o Infrequent shows at various sites (special events)o Usually only 30-60 minutes long

• Entertainmento Nightly show at a fixed site (theme parks)o Infrequent shows at various sites (special events)o Usually only 30-60 minutes long

Laser use in airspace

Page 11: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Unduly restricts legitimate users• Does not prevent accidental

illumination incidents• Does not stop deliberate targeting

of aircrafto Ignorance – does not know effectso Malice – trying to cause harm

Page 12: Lasers and aviation Safety

How are laser beams

hazardous to aviation?

Page 13: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• From visible laser beams:o Visual interference during critical phases of

flight• Distraction, glare and flashblindness

o Potential eye damage during any phase of flight

• From non-visible (infrared, ultraviolet) beams:o Potential eye damage during any phase of

flight

Page 14: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Distractiono Distracting, but

can see past the light

o 0.5 μW/cm2

o 5 mW laser pointer at 3,700 feet (1130m)

Page 15: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Glareo Interferes with

visiono 5.0 μW/cm2

o 5 mW laser pointer at 1,200 feet (365m)

Page 16: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Temporary flashblindnesso Blocks vision

during and after exposure

o 100 μW/cm2

o 5 mW laser pointer at 350 feet (107m)

Page 17: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• 2004 FAA simulator studyo Pilots flew a challenging “short-final”

approacho Glare and flashblindness significant

• Adverse effects for more than 50% of the approaches

• 20-25% rate of aborted landings

Page 18: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

Page 19: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Can be caused by visible or non-visible laser beams, at power above the MPE

• Unlikely, though possible• Few confirmed reports• “Damage” could be pre- or post-

exposureo Previous eye injuries or abormalitieso Rubbing the eye after exposure

Page 20: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

Page 21: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

Page 22: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

Page 23: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

Page 24: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

Page 25: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

Page 26: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

Page 27: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

Page 28: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Eye hazard to 1600 feet (488m)• Flashblindness to 8200 feet (1.5

mi/2.5 km)• Glare to 36,800 feet (7 mi/11.2 km)• Distraction to 368,000 feet (70

mi/112 km)

Page 29: Lasers and aviation Safety

What are the factors affecting the hazard level?

Page 30: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Laser factorso Power, divergence, visible/non-visible,

wavelength, pulsed vs. CW• Operational factors

o Area covered in sky (stationary vs. moving)o Location relative to airportso Terminated vs. non-terminated beamso Use of airspace observers (spotters)o Use of automated detection (radar,

cameras)

Page 31: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Situational factorso Day vs. nighto Aircraft speed and distance (helicopters at

risk)

• Laser pointer user factorso Deliberate (longer and more exposures) vs.

accidental (short, single event)

Page 32: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Pilot factorso Read NOTAMso Flight phase (takeoff, landing, emergency)o Pilot experience and training

• Recognizing a laser event• Properly responding, to successfully avoid

problems

Page 33: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Legal and regulatoryo Follow aviation authority procedures

• FAA, CDRH in USo Laws against interferenceo Restrict the sale or use of laser devices

• May not be practical• May give false sense of security• Does not guard against deliberate intent

Page 34: Lasers and aviation Safety

Single most effective way to

reduce the hazard?

Page 35: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Laser illuminations can be managed with training

• Effective against both accidental and deliberate exposures

• Not a substitute for regulations and restrictions on law-abiding laser users

Page 36: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Educate heavy laser pointer userso www.LaserPointerSafety.como Self-regulation/education by laser pointer

sellers• Package inserts• Permanent labels on laser pointers• Laser pointer seller participation in

regulatory efforts• Laser pointer seller trade association

Page 37: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Facts, news and links on laser pointer safety for the general public

• Reduce annoying and dangerous incidentso “Bad for safety” –

pilots, driverso “Bad for yourself” –

possible arrest, fines, jail

o “Bad for pointers” – misuse will lead to bans

Page 38: Lasers and aviation Safety

What regulations must be followed

in the U.S.?

Page 39: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Federal Aviation Administrationo Does not have direct authority over laser

useso Requests that laser uses be reviewed in

advance by aerospace specialistso Issues a “Letter of Non-Objection” if OK;

a “Letter of Objection” if not OK

Page 40: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Healtho Regulates laser devices (equipment)o Only regulates three uses

• Medical• Surveying• Demonstration

Includes laser pointers and light shows Demonstration users MUST file with FAA and MUST get a

“Letter of Non-Objection”. Only laser users legally required to get permission.

Page 41: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Four zones around airports and sensitive airspace, for visual interferenceo “Laser-Free” Zone, < 0.5 μ/cm2 (50

nanowatts/cm2)o Critical Flight Zone, < 5.0 μ/cm2 o (optional) Sensitive Flight Zone, < 100 μ/cm2 o Normal Zone, <MPE, no visual restrictions

Page 42: Lasers and aviation Safety
Page 43: Lasers and aviation Safety
Page 44: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Almost all lasers outdoors in the U.S.• Even if between two buildings on a city

streeto Helicopters may need to fly between the buildings

• Even if terminated from ground to surfaceso Termination may fail

• FAA control stops at about 60,000 feet• Some lasers are hazards above 60,000 feet

o Must be reported to Air Force Space Command• No current requirement to detect hard-to-

spot aircrafto Stealth, unmanned aerial vehicles, supersonic

Page 45: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• FAA Form 7140-1 (part of Advisory Circular 70-1)

Page 46: Lasers and aviation Safety

Current status

Page 47: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• SAE G-10T Laser Safety Hazards Subcommittee

• ANSI Z136.6 Standard for Safe Use of Lasers Outdoors

Page 48: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• SAE G-10T working on guidelines for automated detection and avoidance systems

• Prominent laser users (e.g., observatories) and laser shows follow FAA guidelines

• Laser pointers now are the area of primary concern

• Some concern over deliberate targeting to cause harmo Difficult to do, not very effective

Page 49: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• This ILSC paper and its references• Wikipedia article “Lasers and

Aviation Safety”o Subject to “anyone can edit” caveat of any

Wikipedia article

• www.LaserPointerSafety.como Links page

Page 50: Lasers and aviation Safety

Questions

Page 51: Lasers and aviation Safety
Page 52: Lasers and aviation Safety

(Note: Slides after this point are “leftovers” which did not fit into the main presentation, or which had material included in other slides. They are left for

future versions which may find the leftover slides useful.)

Page 53: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Laser power• Beam divergence• Visible vs. non-visible (infrared

and ultraviolet)• Color

o Green can be 2-10 times more visible than equal power red or blue lasers

• Pulsed vs. continuous

Page 54: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Beam movemento Stationary: Smaller chance of flying through

beam; easier to protect via spotters or automated methods

o Moving (laser show): Greater chance of exposure

• Location relative to airports and airlanes

• Projector and laser stability

Page 55: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Day vs. nighto Only dusk/night/dawn a problem for visible

laserso More visible lasers operate at night

• Motion and speed of the aircrafto Helicopters are at greatest risk due to hovering

• Distance to the aircrafto Low-flying planes and helicopters at greatest

risk

Page 56: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Flight phaseo Takeoff, approach, landing, emergency

maneuvers

• Pilot awarenesso Prior exposure to laser illumination

concepts

• Pilot responseo Overreaction vs. “fly the plane”

Page 57: Lasers and aviation Safety

International Laser Display Association

• Intento Deliberate targeting

• Longer exposure• May be coordinated with others (Sydney, 2008)• Easier to catch (though still not easy)• May recur, hit multiple planes and/or multiple

nightso Accidental targeting

• One-time-only accident


Recommended