Last Time
• Histograms– Binomial Probability Distributions– Lists of Numbers– Real Data– Excel Computation
• Notions of Center– Average of list of numbers– Weighted Average
Administrative Matters
Midterm I, coming Tuesday, Feb. 24
• Excel notation to avoid actual calculation– So no computers or calculators
• Bring sheet of formulas, etc.
• No blue books needed
(will just write on my printed version)
Administrative Matters
Midterm I, coming Tuesday, Feb. 24
• Material Covered:
HW 1 – HW 5
– Note: due Thursday, Feb. 19– Will ask grader to return Mon. Feb. 23– Can pickup in my office (Hanes 352)– So this weeks HW not included
Administrative Matters
Midterm I, coming Tuesday, Feb. 24
• Extra Office Hours:– Monday, Feb. 23 8:00 – 9:00– Monday, Feb. 23 9:00 – 10:00– Monday, Feb. 23 10:00 – 11:00– Tuesday, Feb. 24 8:00 – 9:00– Tuesday, Feb. 24 9:00 – 10:00– Tuesday, Feb. 24 1:00 – 2:00
Administrative Matters
Midterm I, coming Tuesday, Feb. 24
• How to study:– Rework HW problems
• Since problems come from there• Actually do, not “just look over”• In random order (as on exam)• Print HW sheets, use as a checklist
– Work Practice Exam• Posted in Blackboard “Course Information” Area
Reading In Textbook
Approximate Reading for Today’s Material:
Pages 277-282, 34-43
Approximate Reading for Next Class:
Pages 55-68, 319-326
Big Picture
• Margin of Error
• Choose Sample Size
Need better prob tools
Start with visualizing probability distributions
Big Picture
• Margin of Error
• Choose Sample Size
Need better prob tools
Start with visualizing probability distributions,
Next exploit constant shape property of Bi
Big Picture
Start with visualizing probability distributions,
Next exploit constant shape property of Binom’l
Big Picture
Start with visualizing probability distributions,
Next exploit constant shape property of Binom’l
Centerpoint feels p
Big Picture
Start with visualizing probability distributions,
Next exploit constant shape property of Binom’l
Centerpoint feels p Spread feels n
Big Picture
Start with visualizing probability distributions,
Next exploit constant shape property of Binom’l
Centerpoint feels p Spread feels n
Now quantify these ideas, to put them to work
Notions of Center
Will later study “notions of spread”
Notions of Center
Textbook: Sections 4.4 and 1.2
Recall parallel development:
(a) Probability Distributions
(b) Lists of Numbers
Study 1st, since easier
Notions of Center
(b) Lists of Numbers
“Average” or “Mean” of x1, x2, …, xn
Mean = =
common
notation
xn
xn
ii
1
Notions of Center
Generalization of Mean:
“Weighted Average”
Intuition: Corresponds to finding balance
point of weights on number line
1x 2x 3x
Notions of Center
Generalization of Mean:
“Weighted Average”
Intuition: Corresponds to finding balance
point of weights on number line
1x 2x 3x
Notions of Center
Textbook: Sections 4.4 and 1.2
Recall parallel development:
(a) Probability Distributions
(b) Lists of Numbers
Notions of Center
(a) Probability distributions, f(x)
Approach: use connection to lists of numbers
Notions of Center
(a) Probability distributions, f(x)
Approach: use connection to lists of numbers
Recall: think about many repeated
draws
Notions of Center
(a) Probability distributions, f(x)
Approach: use connection to lists of numbers
Draw X1, X2, …, Xn from f(x)
Notions of Center
(a) Probability distributions, f(x)
Approach: use connection to lists of numbers
Draw X1, X2, …, Xn from f(x)
Compute and express in terms of f(x)X
Notions of Center
n
XXX n
1
Notions of Center
n
XXX n1
n
XX ii 22#11#
Rearrange list, depending on values
Notions of Center
n
XXX n1
n
XX ii 22#11#
Number of Xis that are 1
Notions of Center
n
XXX n1
n
XX ii 22#11#
Apply Distributive Law of Arithmetic
2
2#1
1#
n
X
n
X ii
Notions of Center
n
XXX n1
n
XX ii 22#11#
Recall “Empirical Probability Function”
2
2#1
1#
n
X
n
X ii
22ˆ11ˆ ff
Notions of Center
n
XXX n1
22ˆ11ˆ ff
Notions of Center
n
XXX n1
22ˆ11ˆ ff
2211 ii XPXP
Frequentist approximation
Notions of Center
n
XXX n1
22ˆ11ˆ ff
2211 ii XPXP
2211 ff
Notions of Center
n
XXX n1
22ˆ11ˆ ff
2211 ii XPXP
A weighted average of values that X takes on
2211 ff
Notions of Center
n
XXX n1
22ˆ11ˆ ff
2211 ii XPXP
A weighted average of values that X takes on, where weights are probabilities
2211 ff
Notions of Center
n
XXX n1
A weighted average of values that X takes on, where weights are probabilities
2211 ff
This concept deserves its own name:Expected Value
Expected Value
Define Expected Value of a random variable X:
Expected Value
Define Expected Value of a random variable X:
xfxEXx
Expected Value
Define Expected Value of a random variable X:
Useful shorthand notation
xfxEXx
Expected Value
Define Expected Value of a random variable X:
Recall f(x) = 0, for most x, so sum
only operates for values X takes
on
xfxEXx
Expected Value
E.g. Roll a die, bet (as before):
Expected Value
E.g. Roll a die, bet (as before):
Win $9 if 5 or 6, Pay $4, if 1, 2 or 3, otherwise
(4) break even
Expected Value
E.g. Roll a die, bet (as before):
Win $9 if 5 or 6, Pay $4, if 1, 2 or 3, otherwise
(4) break even
Let X = “net winnings”
Expected Value
E.g. Roll a die, bet (as before):
Win $9 if 5 or 6, Pay $4, if 1, 2 or 3, otherwise
(4) break even
Let X = “net winnings”
otherwise
x
x
x
xf
0
0
4
9
)(61
21
31
Expected Value
E.g. Roll a die, bet (as before):
Win $9 if 5 or 6, Pay $4, if 1, 2 or 3, otherwise
(4) break even
Let X = “net winnings”
Are you keen to play?
otherwise
x
x
x
xf
0
0
4
9
)(61
21
31
Expected Value
Let X = “net winnings”
otherwise
x
x
x
xf
0
0
4
9
)(61
21
31
Expected Value
Let X = “net winnings”
Weighted average, wts & values
otherwise
x
x
x
xf
0
0
4
9
)(61
21
31
x
xfxEX )(
Expected Value
Let X = “net winnings”
Weighted average, wts & values
otherwise
x
x
x
xf
0
0
4
9
)(61
21
31
6121
31 0)4(9)( x
xfxEX
Expected Value
Let X = “net winnings”
i.e. weight average of values 9, -4 & 0, with
weights of “how often expect”, thus “expected”
otherwise
x
x
x
xf
0
0
4
9
)(61
21
31
10)4(9)( 61
21
31 x
xfxEX
Expected Value
Let X = “net winnings”
Conclusion: on average in many plays, expect
to win $1 per play.
otherwise
x
x
x
xf
0
0
4
9
)(61
21
31
10)4(9)( 61
21
31 x
xfxEX
Expected Value
Caution: “Expected value” is not what is
expected on one play
(which is either 9, -4 or 0)
But instead on average, over many plays
HW: 4.73, 4.74 (1.9, 1)
Expected Value
Real life applications of expected value:
• Decision Theory
– Operations Research
– Rational basis for making business decisions
– In presence of uncertainty
– Common Goal: maximize expected profits
– Gives good average results over long run
Expected Value
Real life applications of expected value:
• Decision Theory
• Casino Gambling
– Casino offers games with + expected value
(+ from their perspective)
– Their goal: good overall average performance
– Expected Value is a useful tool for this
Expected Value
Real life applications of expected value:
• Decision Theory
• Casino Gambling
• Insurance
– Companies make profit
– By writing policies with + expected value
– Their goal is long run average performance
Expected Value
Real life applications of expected value:
• Decision Theory
• Casino Gambling
• Insurance
• State Lotteries
– State’s view: games with + expected value
– Raise money for state in long run overall
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
• Casino Gambling
– Why do people play?
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
• Casino Gambling
– Why do people play?
– Odds are against them
– For sure will lose “over long run”
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
• Casino Gambling
– Why do people play?
– Odds are against them
– For sure will lose “over long run”
– But love of short run successes, can make
eventual long term loss worthwhile
– Are buying entertainment
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
• Casino Gambling
• Insurance
– Why should you buy it?
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
• Casino Gambling
• Insurance
– Why should you buy it?
– You lose in expected value sense
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
• Casino Gambling
• Insurance
– Why should you buy it?
– You lose in expected value sense
– But E not applicable since you only play once
– Avoids chance of catastrophic loss
– Allows low cost sharing of risk
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
• Casino Gambling
• Insurance
• State Lotteries
– Why do people play?
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
• Casino Gambling
• Insurance
• State Lotteries
– Why do people play?
– Clear loss in expected value
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
• Casino Gambling
• Insurance
• State Lotteries
– Why do people play?
– Clear loss in expected value
– But only play once (hopefull), so not applicable
– Worth feeling of hope from buying ticket?
Flip Side of Expected Value
Interesting issues about State Lotteries:
A very different type of tax
Big Plus:
• Only totally voluntary tax
Big Minus:
• Tax paid mostly by poor
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
Key Lesson: Expected Value tells what
happens on average over long run,
not in one play
Flip Side of Expected Value
Decisions made against expected value:
Key Lesson: Expected Value tells what
happens on average over long run,
not in one play
Conclude Expected Value not good for
everything, but very good for many things
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
e.g. you owe mafia $5000 (gambling debt?),
clean out safe at work for $5000.
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
e.g. you owe mafia $5000 (gambling debt?),
clean out safe at work for $5000.
If give to mafia, you go to jail
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
e.g. you owe mafia $5000 (gambling debt?),
clean out safe at work for $5000.
If give to mafia, you go to jail, so decide to
raise another $5000 by gambling.
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
and can make even bets, with P[win] = 0.48
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
and can make even bets, with P[win] = 0.48
Can really do this, e.g. bet on Red in game of
Roulette at a casino
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
and can make even bets, with P[win] = 0.48
Important question:
Make one large bet? Or many small bets?
Something in between?
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
and can make even bets, with P[win] = 0.48
Make one large bet? Or many small bets?
E[Gain] = 0 x P[loss] + $2 x P[win]
= 0 x (0.52) + $2 x (0.48) =
$0.96
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
and can make even bets, with P[win] = 0.48
Make one large bet? Or many small bets?
E[Gain] = $0.96
Interpretation: “expect” to lose $0.04 every
time you play
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
and can make even bets, with P[win] = 0.48
Make one large bet? Or many small bets?
E[Gain] = $0.96
Interpretation: “expect” to lose $0.04 every
time you play
Why games are so profitable for casinos
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
and can make even bets, with P[win] = 0.48
Make one large bet? Or many small bets?
E[Gain] = $0.96
Interpretation: “expect” to lose $0.04 every
time you play
Many plays Expected Value dictates result
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Suppose you have $5000, and need $10,000
and can make even bets, with P[win] = 0.48
Make one large bet? Or many small bets?
E[Gain] = $0.96
Interpretation: “expect” to lose $0.04 every
time you play
So best to make just one large bet!
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Interpretation: “expect” to lose $0.04 every
time you play
So best to make just one large bet!
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Interpretation: “expect” to lose $0.04 every
time you play
So best to make just one large bet!
After many plays, will surely lose!
(lesson of expected value)
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Another View:
Strategy P[win $1,0000]
one $5000 bet 0.48 ≈ ½
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Another View:
Strategy P[win $1,0000]
one $5000 bet 0.48 ≈ ½
two $2500 bets ≈ (0.48)2 ≈ ¼
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Another View:
Strategy P[win $1,0000]
one $5000 bet 0.48 ≈ ½
two $2500 bets ≈ (0.48)2 ≈ ¼
four $1250 bets ≈ 1/16
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Another View:
Strategy P[win $1,0000]
one $5000 bet 0.48 ≈ ½
two $2500 bets ≈ (0.48)2 ≈ ¼
four $1250 bets ≈ 1/16
many bets no chance
Another Inverse View of Expected Value
Interpretation: “expect” to lose $0.04 every
time you play
So best to make just one large bet!
Casino Folklore: Sometimes people really
make such bets
Expected Value
Binomial Expected Value:
For X ~ Bi(n,p),
Expected Value
Binomial Expected Value:
For X ~ Bi(n,p), Expected Value is
probability weighted average of values
x
xfxEX )(
Expected Value
Binomial Expected Value:
For X ~ Bi(n,p), Expected Value is
Use Binomial Probability Distribution
x
xnx
xpp
x
nxxfxEX 1)(
Expected Value
Binomial Expected Value:
For X ~ Bi(n,p), Expected Value is
After a long and tricky calculation
(details beyond scope of this course)
x
xnx
xpp
x
nxxfxEX 1)(
pn
Expected Value
For X ~ Bi(n,p),
• Makes sense:
“Expect” to win proportion p, of n trials
pnEX
Expected Value
For X ~ Bi(n,p),
• Makes sense:
“Expect” to win proportion p, of n trials
• Just use this formula from here on out
pnEX
Expected Value
For X ~ Bi(n,p),
• Makes sense:
“Expect” to win proportion p, of n trials
• Just use this formula from here on out
• E.g. to capture “shifting mean”
pnEX
Expected Value
For X ~ Bi(n,p),
HW:
5.28a, mean part only (900)
5.29a, mean part only
pnEX
Properties of Expected Value
Linearity:
For X ~ f(x) and Y ~ g(y)
E(aX + bY) =
Properties of Expected Value
Linearity:
For X ~ f(x) and Y ~ g(y)
E(aX + bY) = Σx Σy (ax + by) f(x) g(y)
Weighted average, where
weights
are probabilities
Properties of Expected Value
Linearity:
For X ~ f(x) and Y ~ g(y)
E(aX + bY) = Σx Σy (ax + by) f(x) g(y) =
= Σx Σy (ax f(x) g(y) + by f(x)
g(y))
(Distributive Rule)
Properties of Expected Value
Linearity:
For X ~ f(x) and Y ~ g(y)
E(aX + bY) = Σx Σy (ax + by) f(x) g(y) =
= Σx Σy (ax f(x) g(y) + by f(x) g(y)) =
= Σx Σy axf(x)g(y) + Σx Σy axf(x)g(y)
(Associative Property of Addition)
Properties of Expected Value
Linearity:
For X ~ f(x) and Y ~ g(y)
E(aX + bY) = Σx Σy (ax + by) f(x) g(y) =
= Σx Σy (ax f(x) g(y) + by f(x) g(y)) =
= Σx Σy axf(x)g(y) + Σx Σy axf(x)g(y) =
= (Σxaxf(x)) Σyg(y) + (Σxf(x)) Σybyg(y)
(Distributive Rule)
Properties of Expected Value
Linearity: For X ~ f(x) and Y ~ g(y)
E(aX + bY) =
= (Σxaxf(x)) Σyg(y) + (Σxf(x)) Σybyg(y)
Properties of Expected Value
Linearity: For X ~ f(x) and Y ~ g(y)
E(aX + bY) =
= (Σxaxf(x)) Σyg(y) + (Σxf(x)) Σybyg(y) =
= Σx a x f(x) + Σy b y g(y)
(Since Σx f(x) = Σy y g(y) = 1)
Properties of Expected Value
Linearity: For X ~ f(x) and Y ~ g(y)
E(aX + bY) =
= (Σxaxf(x)) Σyg(y) + (Σxf(x)) Σybyg(y) =
= Σx a x f(x) + Σy b y g(y) =
= a Σx x f(x) + b Σy y g(y)
(Distributive Rule)
Properties of Expected Value
Linearity: For X ~ f(x) and Y ~ g(y)
E(aX + bY) =
= (Σxaxf(x)) Σyg(y) + (Σxf(x)) Σybyg(y) =
= Σx a x f(x) + Σy b y g(y) =
= a Σx x f(x) + b Σy y g(y) =
= a E(X) + b E(Y)
Properties of Expected Value
Linearity: For X ~ f(x) and Y ~ g(y)
E(aX + bY) = a E(X) + b E(Y)
i.e. E(linear combo) = linear combo (E)
Properties of Expected Value
HW:
4.81 (mean part only)
4.84 (mean part only)
Properties of Expected Value
HW: C18 An insurance company sells 1378
policies to cover bicycles against theft for 1
year. It costs $300 to replace a stolen
bicycle and the probability of theft is
estimated at 0.08. Suppose there is no
chance of more than one theft per
individual.
Properties of Expected Value
HW: C18 (cont.)
a. Calculate the expected payout for each
policy, to give a break even price for each
policy. ($24)
b. If 2 times the break even price is actually
charged, what is the company’s expected
profit per policy, if the theft rate is actually
0.10? ($18)
Research Corner
Recall Hidalgo Recall Hidalgo
StampData &StampData &
Movie over binwidthMovie over binwidth
Research Corner
Recall Hidalgo Recall Hidalgo
StampData &StampData &
Movie over binwidthMovie over binwidth
Main point:Main point:
Binwidth drives Binwidth drives
histogram performancehistogram performance
Research Corner
Less known fact:Less known fact:
Bin Bin locationlocation also has also has
Serious effectSerious effect
(even for fixed width)(even for fixed width)
Research Corner
How many bumps?How many bumps?
~2?~2?
Research Corner
How many bumps?How many bumps?
~3?~3?
Research Corner
How many bumps?How many bumps?
~7?~7?
Research Corner
How many bumps?How many bumps?
~7?~7?
Research Corner
Explanation?Explanation?
Compare with “smoothedCompare with “smoothed
version” called version” called
““Kernel Density Estimate”Kernel Density Estimate”
Research Corner
Compare with “smoothedCompare with “smoothed
version” called version” called
““Kernel Density Estimate”Kernel Density Estimate”
Peaks appear:Peaks appear:
when when entirely in entirely in a bina bin
Research Corner
Compare with “smoothedCompare with “smoothed
version” called version” called
““Kernel Density Estimate”Kernel Density Estimate”
Peaks disappear:Peaks disappear:
when split betweenwhen split between
two bins bintwo bins bin
Research Corner
Question: If understand problem with Question: If understand problem with histogram, using histogram, using Kernel Density EstimateKernel Density Estimate
Then why not use Then why not use KDEKDE for data analysis? for data analysis?
Will explore Will explore KDEKDE later. later.
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
Works well for ~symmetric distributions
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
Works well for ~symmetric distributions
E.g. Buffalo Snowfalls
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
Works well for ~symmetric distributions
E.g. Buffalo Snowfalls
Analyzed in:http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg6.xls
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
Works well for ~symmetric distributions
E.g. Buffalo Snowfalls
Mean = 80.3
(from Excel)
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
Works well for ~symmetric distributions
E.g. Buffalo Snowfalls
Mean = 80.3
(from Excel)
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
Works well for ~symmetric distributions
E.g. Buffalo Snowfalls
Mean = 80.3
Visually sensible
Notion of “Center”
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
• Time (in days) to suicide attempt
• Of Suicide Patients
• After Initial Treatment
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Analyzed in:http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg6.xls
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Clearly not mound shaped
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Clearly not mound shaped
Very asymmetric
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Clearly not mound shaped
Very asymmetric
Called “right skewed”
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Mean = 122.3
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Mean = 122.3
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Mean = 122.3
Sensible as “center”??
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Mean = 122.3
Sensible as “center”??
%(data ≥) = 30.2%
Notions of Center
Caution about mean:
But poorly for asymmetric distributions
E.g. British Suicides Data
Mean = 122.3
Sensible as “center”??
%(data ≥) = 30.2%
Too Small…
Notions of Center
Perhaps better notion of “center”:
• Take center to be point in middle
• I.e. have 50% of data smaller
• And 50% of data larger
This is called the “median”
Notions of Center
Median: = Value in middle (of sorted list)
Notions of CenterMedian: = Value in middle (of sorted list)
Unsorted E.g: Sorted E.g:
3 0
1 1
27 2
2 3
0 27
Notions of CenterMedian: = Value in middle (of sorted list)
Unsorted E.g: Sorted E.g:
3 0
1 1
27 2
2 3
0 27
One in middle???
Notions of CenterMedian: = Value in middle (of sorted list)
Unsorted E.g: Sorted E.g:
3 0
1 1
27 2
2 3
0 27
One in middle??? NO, must sort
Notions of CenterMedian: = Value in middle (of sorted list)
Unsorted E.g: Sorted E.g:
3 0
1 1
27 2
2 3
0 27
Sensible version of “middle”
Notions of CenterWhat about ties?
Sorted E.g:
0
1
2
3
Notions of CenterWhat about ties?
Sorted E.g:
0
Tie for point in 1
middle 2
3
Notions of CenterWhat about ties?
Sorted E.g:
0
Tie for point in 1
middle 2
3
Break by taking average (of two tied values):
Notions of CenterWhat about ties?
Sorted E.g:
0
Tie for point in 1
middle 2
3
Break by taking average (of two tied values):
e.g. Median = 1.5
Notions of CenterMedian: = Value in middle (of sorted list)
Unsorted E.g: Sorted E.g:
3 0
1 1
27 2
2 3
0 27
EXCEL: use function “MEDIAN”
Notions of CenterEXCEL: use function “MEDIAN”
Very similar to other functions
E.g. see:http://www.stat-or.unc.edu/webspace/courses/marron/UNCstor155-2009/ClassNotes/Stor155Eg6.xls
Notions of Center
E.g. Buffalo Snowfalls
Mean = 80.3
Notions of Center
E.g. Buffalo Snowfalls
Mean = 80.3
Median = 79.6
(from Excel)
Notions of Center
E.g. Buffalo Snowfalls
Mean = 80.3
Median = 79.6
Very similar
Notions of Center
E.g. Buffalo Snowfalls
Mean = 80.3
Median = 79.6
Very similar
(expected from
symmetry)
Notions of Center
E.g. British Suicides Data
Mean = 122.3
Median = 77.5
Substantially different
Notions of Center
E.g. British Suicides Data
Mean = 122.3
Median = 77.5
Substantially different
Notions of Center
E.g. British Suicides Data
Mean = 122.3
Median = 77.5
Substantially different
But which is better?
Notions of Center
E.g. British Suicides Data
Mean = 122.3
Median = 77.5
Substantially different
But which is better?
Goal 1: ½ - ½ middle
Notions of Center
E.g. British Suicides Data
Mean = 122.3
Median = 77.5
Substantially different
But which is better?
Goal 1: ½ - ½ middle
Goal 2: long run average