Latest results and overview
Work Package 5: Utilisation of kenaf for industrial products and energy.
S.J.J. Lipsdepartment Fibre & Paper technology
Athens 26 February 2007
Content
• Overview– fibre decortication (separation)– fibre quality– insulation mats– kenaf core absorbers– kenaf fibre/PP composites
• Extra tests of kenaf mats under high humidity
• SEM pictures of kenaf
Market and techno-economic feasibility study
• Separation only worthwhile if both fractions can be sold.
• Application of separated kenaf bast fibre in insulation.
• Application of kenaf core as absorber.
Affected kenaf stems
Unaffected FAIR project
Affected BIOKENAF project
Fibre decortication
• Easy Separation no extra retting necessary
• Still 11% of core particles present in the fibre fraction
Tensile fracture of a kenaf fibres
Material Tensile strength (MPa)
St.dev n
Kenaf FAIR retted 556 – 682 FAIR green decorticated 276 - 435 CETA fibres 343 - 486 Uni Catania fibres 425 41 3 Uni Nova fibres 374 69 3 Uni Nova fibres retted 462 88 5 Flax 500-880 Hemp 400-750 Jute 351-468 Sisal 650
Tensile fracture of a kenaf fibre bundle
Insulation mats
Info website 0.038ISOVERSonepanel
Info website NEN-EN 12667
0.036ROCKWOOLSpouwplaat 433
Info website ISO 8302/91
0.039KEFIISOLKENAF
Biokenaf measurements NEN-EN 12667
0.041ISOVLASISOVLAS PL
Biokenaf measurements NEN-EN 12667
0.043KEFIKenaf
RemarksThermal conductivity
[W.m-1.K-1]
CompanySample
Coefficient of thermal conductivity
Insulation mats
• Kenaf mats showed 10-15% lower than given values for mineral mats
• With less core particles left in the fibres lower values comparable to the measured flax mats are expected.
Moisture absorption of natural fibres
5.0
7.0
9.0
11.0
13.0
15.0
17.0
19.0
21.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
time (h)
wa
ter
(%)
kenaf CETA green decorticated
kenaf CETA warm water retted
kenaf FAIR warm water retted
flax green decorticated
flax dew-retted
jute yarn
sisal fibres from yarn
Moisture uptake of insulation mats under semi- aerobic conditions
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
hours
moi
stur
e up
take
(%
)
flax 100% RHflax 94% RHflax 85% RHkenaf 100% RHkenaf 94% RHkenaf 85% RH
Moisture absorption insulation mats under aerobic humid conditions
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
hours
wei
ght g
ain
(%)
kenaf 1kenaf 2flax 3flax 4
90% RH 94% RH
Moisture desorption of locally wetted insulation mats at 23 oC and 30% Relative Humidity
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
0 5 10 15 20 25
hours
mo
istu
re c
on
ten
t (%
)
kenaf 1
kenaf 2
flax 3
flax 4
Moisture absorption insulation mats under aerobic humid conditions
Moisture absorption of fibre mats
• Kenaf mats show no visible microbial degradation at 94% RH and 23 0C and have a low moisture uptake.
• Flax mats with fire retardants show high water uptake in humid air and microbial degradation.
• After wetting kenaf mats show faster evaporation than flax mats with fire retardants.
• Use of fire retardants with kenaf mats will also increase moisture uptake
Moisture absorption of fibre mats
• Use of fire retardants with kenaf mats will also increase moisture uptake.
• Good ventilation is a prerequisite
Conclusions - fibres
• Easy fibre extraction
• weakened fibres - 60% of maximum
• Weakened fibres can be used insulation mats
Fibre Quality
• To ensure sustainable kenaf fibre business
• a broader range of possible applications must be developed by improving the quality of the fibres.
• Higher quality fibres might be achieved by studying and developing new retting and extraction processes.
Water retention of animal bedding materials
0,000,501,001,502,002,503,003,504,004,50
C250 C2500
Speed Of Centrifuging (rpm)
WR
V (
g w
ate
r /
g d
rie
d
ma
teri
al)
Wheat Straw Flax Core Hemp CoreKenaf Core Large Kenaf Core Medium Kenaf Core FineWood Shavings
Water retention kenaf pith
2.0
6.0
10.0
14.0
18.0
22.0
0 5 10 15 20Time of soaking (Hours)
WR
V (
g w
ate
r /
g d
ry m
att
er)
Flax Core Hemp Core Kenaf Core FineKenaf Core Medium Kenaf Core Large Wood ShavingsWheat Straw Kenaf Pith
Structure of kenaf stem (Everglades 41)
Structure of kenaf stem (Everglades 41)
Bast structure of kenaf (Everglades 41)
Transverse section of a Kenaf core particle
Transverse section of a Kenaf core particle
Transverse section of a Kenaf core particle
Parenchymatic tissue in Kenaf core particles
Parenchymatic tissue in Kenaf core particles
Pith cells
Pith cells
Conclusions - water absorption kenaf core
• Large core fraction is the best water absorber of all the tested materials.
• Kenaf core medium and fine absorb – somewhat less than wheat straw and core of
hemp and flax– more than wood shavings
• Kenaf pith is a very good absorber.
Oil absorption kenaf core and other materials
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7K
en
af
Pit
h
Str
aw
Wo
od
Sh
av
ing
s
Fla
x C
ore
K C
Fin
e
He
mp
Co
re
K C
La
rge
K C
Me
diu
m
Ch
em
So
rb
Oil Absorption
Different letters mean significant differencesa
b c
e e e
f
d
c
g/g
Oil absorption of milled kenaf core and milled other materials
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Ke
na
f P
ith
K C
La
rge
Fla
x C
ore
Wo
od
Sh
av
ing
s
Str
aw
He
mp
Co
re
K C
Fin
e
K C
Me
diu
m
Oil Absorption
d
a
b b d d
Different letters mean significant differences
cb
Oil absorption of milled kenaf core and milled other materials
0
1
2
3
4
5
6K
C L
arg
e
Fla
x C
ore
Wo
od
Sh
av
ing
s
Str
aw
He
mp
Co
re
K C
Fin
e
K C
Me
diu
m
Oil Absorption
d
b b
d d
Different letters mean significant differences
cb
Oil absorption of kenaf fibre mats (K.E.F.I.)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 100 200 300 400 500
density (kg/m3)
ab
so
rpti
on
(g
/g)
kenaf mat theory kenaf mat flax mat flax mat theory
Conclusions – oil absorbtion
• Kenaf core as received shows low level of oil. The level is comparable to that found by Ghalambor
• Kenaf core is not a better oil absorber than the other tested organic materials
• Extra milling increases the oil absorption capacity
Conclusions – oil absorbtion
• Kenaf pith absorbs 200% more oil than kenaf core
• Milled kenaf core absorbs 500% more oil than not milled kenaf core. This is comparable to the ratio found by Ghalambor
• Kenaf /polyester mats show high absorption capacity for oil. They can be pressed out and re-used at least six times without loosing their absorption capacity.
Producing Kenaf-Polypropylene composite
Moulded test pieces
matrix
Strength properties of kenaf fibres/ PP compounds
Material Flexural Modulus
[GPa]
Flexural Strength [MPa]
Strain [%]
Charpy impact [kJ/m2]
CETA 3.3 (0.2) 53 (1) 3.6 (0.1) 12 (1) CETA +MAPP 3.2 (0.1) 71 (1) 4.1 (0.1) 12 (2) UniNova +MAPP* 3.1 (0.2) 70 (1) 4.2 (0.1) 13 (2) *warm water retted
Strength properties of kenaf fibres/ PP compounds
Material
Flexural Modulus [GPa]
Flexural Strength [MPa]
Strain [%]
Charpy impact [kJ /m2]
CETA* 3.3 53 3.6 12 CETA +MAPP 3.2 71 4.1 12 UniNova +MAPP 3.1 70 4.2 13 FAIR unretted 4.0 53 3.1 11 FAIR retted 4.1 55 3.2 12 Jute 3.2 69 4.8 18 Hemp 2.7 - 3 59 - 67 4.8 – 5.3 13 - 19
*fibres produced by CETA and extracted by KEFI
Conclusions Kenaf/PP compounding
• The tested kenaf fibres can compete with other natural fibres on flexural strength properties, but not on impact strength.
• Retted kenaf fibres harvested in autumn did not give stronger composites than CETA/KEFI fibres
• Quality of the fibres in relation to harvest time and extraction method must be further investigated
Conclusions - general
• Technically numerous application are possible.
• Competitiveness with other materials or quality aspects limits the number of applications.
• Higher quality fibres might be achieved by studying and developing new retting and extraction processes.