Latinos and Christian Higher Education: Current Needs and Future Opportunities in the Recruitment and Retention of
Latino Students
2010 CCCU International Forum on Christian Higher Education
Pete Menjares, Ph.D. – Associate Provost for Diversity Leadership, Biola UniversityCarlos Campo, Ph.D. – President Elect, Regent University,
Marcela Chaván-Matviuk, Ph.D. – Director, Center for Latino Leadership, Regent UniversityRobert Reyes, Ph, D. - Research Director, - Center for Intercultural Teaching & Learning, Goshen
CollegeRebecca Hernandez, Ph.D. –Director, Center for Intercultural Teaching & Learning, Goshen
College
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Latinos and Christian Higher Education: Current Needs and Future Opportunities in the Midwest.
2010 CCCU International Forum on Christian Higher Education
Robert Reyes, Ph, D. - Research Director, - Center for Intercultural Teaching & Learning, Goshen College
Rebecca Hernandez, Ph.D. –Director, Center for Intercultural Teaching & Learning, Goshen College
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Learning Objectives
1. Participants will be introduced to current demographic, economic and educational trends of the Hispanic/Latino population in the Eastern North Central Region of the Midwest (Great Lakes States).
2. Participants will be introduced to some of the most recent demographic changes in northeastern Indiana.
3. Participants will be introduced to current retention efforts at Goshen College.
4. Participants will examine lessons CITL has learned in providing services to Latino students.
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Geographical Point of ReferenceMidwest Region of the United States
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
East North Central Region (Great Lakes States) Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
West North Central Region (Plains States) Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and
South Dakota
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
I. Delineation of Demographic Information: Hispanic Population in the Northeastern
Central Region (Great Lakes States)
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Hispanic Population Age Distribution in the Great Lakes States 2008 ACS 1-year Estimates
35.1%38.8%
37.1% 38.3% 38.8%
30.1% 29.3% 29.0% 27.5%29.5%
30.5%28.2% 29.5% 29.4% 28.6%
0.0%5.0%
10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%
Illinois (N=1,967,568)
Indiana (N=328,725)
Michigan (N=413,286)
Ohio (N=299,778)
Wisconsin (N=286,112)
Under 18
Age 18 to 35
Age 35-65
N=Total Hispanic Population
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Percentage of Hispanics to the Total State Population 2008 ACS1-year Estimates
-
2,000,000
4,000,000
6,000,000
8,000,000
10,000,000
12,000,000
14,000,000
Illinois (N = 12,901,564)
Indiana (N = 6,376,792)
Michigan (N=
10,003,422)
Ohio (N = 11,485,910)
Wisconsin (N=
5,627,968)
Total population
Total Hispanic Population
15.25%
5.15% 4.13% 2.61% 5.08%
N = State Total Population
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Hispanic Population US Born vs. Foreign Born in the Great Lakes States 2008 ACS 1-year
Estimates
58.3%63.0%
74.3% 76.6%
66.4%
12.1%7.8% 6.0% 6.2% 7.0%
29.5% 29.2%
19.6% 17.2%
26.6%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
Illinois (N=1,967,568
Indiana (N=328,725)
Michigan (N=413,286)
Ohio (N=299,778)
Wisconsin (N=286,112)
US Born Hispanic
Foreign Born Naturalized US citizen
Foreign Born not US citizen
N=Total Hispanic Population
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Hispanic Population by Place of Origin in the Great Lakes States 2008 ACS 1-year
Estimates
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
Illinois (N=1,967,568)
Indiana (N=328,725)
Michigan (N=413,286)
Ohio (N=299,778)
Wisconsin (N=286,112)
MexicanPuerto RicanCentral American
79.16%
8.93%
3.53%
78.88%
7.94%
49.13%
75.17%
4.91%
75.33%
8.42%4.21%
25.78%
8.01%12.30%
3.14%
N=Total Hispanic Population
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Occupational Trends &Hispanic Population
in the Midwest Region
• Hispanic Males 16 years and over are more heavily represented in the following occupations
• Production (Manufacturing) & Transportation (N= 362,681)• Service Occupations (N=245,066)• Construction or Repair Work (N=203,703)
• Hispanic Females 16 years and over are more heavily represented in the following occupations
• Sales or Office Occupations (N=226,448)• Service Occupations (N=190,644)• Management /Professional Work (157,507)
• Fewer Hispanic workers were represented in the agricultural sector.• For Males - 28,100• For Females – 8,031
Source: 2008 American Community Survey 1 Year Estimates
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Status - dropout rates of 16- through 24-year-olds, by race/ethnicity: Selected years, 1980-2007
Year Total1Race/ethnicity2
White Black Hispanic1980 14.1 11.4 19.1 35.21985 12.6 10.4 15.2 27.61990 12.1 9.0 13.2 32.41995 12.0 8.6 12.1 30.02000 10.9 6.9 13.1 27.82001 10.7 7.3 10.9 27.02002 10.5 6.5 11.3 25.72003 9.9 6.3 10.9 23.52004 10.3 6.8 11.8 23.82005 9.4 6.0 10.4 22.42006 9.3 5.8 10.7 22.12007 8.7 5.3 8.4 21.4
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
47.3%50.2%
46.3% 47.1% 47.4%
21.2% 19.9% 21.5% 19.8% 21.1%16.9%
13.1%
17.9% 17.9%14.1%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
Illinois (N=620,473)
Indiana (N=100,979)
Michigan (N=144,197)
Ohio (N=98,994)
Wisconsin (N=97,335)
Elementary School (grades 1-8)
High School (grades 9-12)
College or graduate school
School Enrollment of Hispanics in Great Lakes States 2008 ACS 1-year
Estimates
N=Total Hispanic Population Enrolled in School
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
41.3% 40.7%
35.2%
30.3%
39.0%
27.6%29.7%
27.6% 28.7% 28.1%
8.3%6.6%
8.4%10.4%
7.7%
0.0%5.0%
10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%
Illinois (N=1,048,984)
Indiana (N=163,699)
Michigan (N=210,290)
Ohio (N=152,627)
Wisconsin (N=142,015)
Less than high school diploma
High school graduate
Bachelor's degree
Educational Attainment of Hispanics in Great Lakes States 2008 ACS 1-year
Estimates
N=Total Hispanic Population 25 and over
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
II. Local Experience -Indiana
Delineation of Social & Educational Factors in Northeastern Indiana
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Age Distribution, Elkhart County 2008 ACS Community Estimates
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
Under 19 20-34 35-64 65 +
TotalHispanic
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Economic Context : Latinos in Elkhart County
•Earn a median household income of $37,010 compared to the total population’s median income of $47,507•Migrate to Midwest for the purpose of attaining jobs available in the unskilled labor market, specifically food processing and light industry. •RV manufacturing was particularly popular, but the recession has cut employment by 15% since 2004•54% of Latinos have less than a high school education (total population 14%)
(Source: 2008 ACS 1-year Estimates and Indiana Department of Workforce Development)
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
School Snapshot: Minority Student Population 1990-2008
Source: Indiana Accountability System for Academic Progress (ASAP)
Minority Students as % of Total Student Body
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
School Snapshot: Limited English Student Population 1991-2008
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
Limited English Students as % of Student Body Indiana
Limited English Students as % of Student Body Goshen Community Schools
Source: Indiana Accountability System for Academic Progress (ASAP)
Limited English Students as % of Student Body Indiana
Limited English Students as % of Student Body Goshen Community Schools
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Current Recruitment & Retention Efforts at Goshen College
III. Interventions-Evaluation
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Areas of Research (Internal & External Foci):
• Our Research has addressed questions on two major fronts:1. Understanding the curricular and co-
curricular experiences of Latino students at Goshen College
2. Exploring the social, economic, and educational context from which these students come
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Initail Examination of the Curricular and Co-Curricular Experiences of Latino Students
• Questions have centered on exploring what challenges students face and what kind of resources they have as they move through the educational process.
• Also, we have questioned how effective different educational interventions have been in fostering social adjustment and academic achievement among students.
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Examination of Social, Economic and Familial Factors
• Understanding existing demographic & economic conditions– helped us understand in more detail the context from which
these students are coming from – developed community access and partnerships for the College
• The study of cultural and social factors has also been helpful in reminding us the kind of social capital (i.e. resources) these students bring to the College.
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Interventions - Educational Access
Goal: To make a Goshen College education accessible to Latino students
Major Activities:• Enhance the recruitment of Latino students by developing
ongoing relationships with parents, schools, churches, businesses and community organizations.
• Increase financial resources for Latino students to attend Goshen College.
• Develop pre-college Program (SALT).
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Focused Recruitment
Definition: To recruit eligible Latino students to Goshen College
Activities• Culturally specific – admission and financial aid literature, specific program brochure
• College Fairs – In addition to traditional college fairs, the Admissions and CITL have committed and allocated financial resources to attending regional and local Hispanic college fairs
• Scholarship – Full-tuition scholarship for 10 students through CITL and DREAM
• Leadership programs for Latino and other ethnic minority students– CITL Leadership program -cohort of 10 per year– Multicultural Leadership program- cohort of 8-10 per year
• Changes in selection process to include group assessment as well as individual
• Summer SALT Program - Summer intensive course & community building
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Lessons Learned from Recruitment Efforts
• The data continues to point to the benefits of developing collaborative partnerships with parents. These partnerships have been helpful in– diminishing fears among students– increasing understanding about college, how it functions, and costs
involved– teaching families about available financial aid resources
• In comparison with other non Hispanic Serving Institutions (HSI), the main reason for attending Goshen College was– Proximity to home– The CITL scholarship– Overall accessibility
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Program Interventions for Retention
• Activities:– Leadership programs for Latino and other ethnic minority students
• CITL Leadership program -cohort of 10 per year– Exploration of Ethnic Identity – Leadership Service Activities in the Community– Peer Mentoring
• Multicultural Leadership program- cohort of 8-10 per year• Intrusive Academic Advising• Development of Student Support through the development of Ethnic Affinity
Groups (i.e., Importance of Place and Relationships)– Concept of Belonging– Empowerment to Initiate New Activities
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Lessons Learned from Program Interventions
• Several programs emphasize the important of leadership development and ethnic identity development. – 1st and 3rd Mondays– Race and Ethnic Identity Colloquium
• “More is not Always Better”– More program activities were develop during the second year of the grant.– CITL Latino students reported that too many group activities made the
experience overwhelming and difficult in meeting other people and making connections in a new environment.
• Participation in our Summer Bridge Program (SALT) – Provided a significant amount of group cohesion among the new CITL cohort. – Enhanced the speed by which the new CITL students dove into ethnic identity
issues in the fall.– Helped accelerate student leadership in campus activities.
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Results of the Examination of the Curricular and Co-Curricular Experiences of Latino
Students
• The results of our findings follow earlier studies that point to:– the importance of faculty support and mentoring in student academic
achievement. – the importance of the application of curricula to vocational choices in
fostering student engagement.
• The results also showed the interconnected nature of external and internal factors and their impact on student academic achievement (Ogbu, 2003; Miles & Huberman, 1994).
• For the purpose of recruitment and retention of students, it is critical to maintain a systemic-ecological view of all the factors affecting academic achievement.
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
Conclusion
What type of issues do you see at your communities as you work with Latino students and their families? What has been your experience?
• For more information contact Dr. Robert Reyes at [email protected]
Thank You
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
References
• Auerbach, S. (2006). “If the student is good let him fly”: Moral support for college students among Latino immigrant parents. Journal of Latinos in Education. 5(4) 275-292.
• Indiana Accountability System for Academic Progress. “School Data, Goshen High School, 1821.” Indiana Department of Education. http://mustang.doe.state.in.us/SEARCH/snapshot.cfm?schl=1821.
• Indiana Department of Workforce Development. Elkhart County, IN Highlights. (June 30, 2009) http://www.hoosierdata.in.gov/highlights/profile.asp?geo_val=S18;C039&page_id=6.
• Millard, A. V. & Chapa, J. (2004). Apple Pie and Enchiladas: Latino Newcomers in the Rural Midwest. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
• Miles, M. & Huberman, A. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
CITL Center for Intercultural Teaching and Learning
References
• Ogbu, J., U. (2003). Black American Students in an Affluent Suburb: A Study of Academic Disengagement. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Smith, M.J. (2008). Four steps to a paradigm shift: Employing critical perspectives to improve to low-SES African-American and Latino students and their parents. Journal of College Admissions. (n. 201) 17-23.
• United States Census (2010). 2008 American Community Survey . One Year Estimates. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_program=ACS&_submenuId=datasets_2&_lang=en
• United States Census (2008). 2006 American Community Survey . One Year Estimates. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DatasetMainPageServlet?_program=ACS&_submenuId=datasets_2&_lang=en.
•