+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP....

Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP....

Date post: 18-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: jemima-lester
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
19
Community- Oriented Policing Law Enforcement II
Transcript
Page 1: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Community- Oriented Policing

Law Enforcement II

Page 2: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

ObjectivesThe student will be able to:Define terms associated with COP.Compare and contrast traditional law

enforcement with COP.Analyze research on traditional law enforcement

and recommendations made about police work.Assess what skills an officer needs to be effective

in COP.Examine ways police departments have

implemented COP.Create methods to address crime in the

community.Evaluate the effectiveness of COP ideas

presented by fellow students.2

UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 3: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

What is Community-Oriented Policing?Community Oriented Policing (COP) is:

Decentralized policing programs that focus onCrime preventionCommunity quality of lifePublic orderAlternatives to arrest

3UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 4: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

What is Community-Oriented Policing?Problem-Oriented Policing (associated with

COP) is:A proactive type of community policing

that focuses on solving the underlying problems of delinquency and crime

4UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 5: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Characteristics of COPFocus is on proactive crime prevention rather

than emergency responseEncourages officers to see citizens as

partnersShifts decision-making downward to patrol

officersMore visible operations

5UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 6: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Rapid responseCrime investigationApprehension of criminal

Law enforcement

Responding to symptoms

6UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Strategies that promote crime prevention

Promote community quality of life and public order

COPTraditional Law Enforcement

Use of alternatives to arrest and force to solve the problem

Page 7: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Origin of COP

7UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Events of the 1960’s

Police Research Presidential Commissions

Data findings

Recommendations

Page 8: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Data FindingsAnalysis of crime statistics showed that

the current emphasis on crime fighting has had a limited effect on reducing crime.

Police isolation Prevented strong ties to the communityHampered crime-fighting effortsResulted in ignorance of unreported crimes

8UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 9: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Data Findings (continued)Randomized patrol had a limited impact

on crimeA large portion of serious crimes were not

deterred by rapid responseThere was less friendly foot patrolling

because of the reimplementation of automobiles

9UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 10: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Data Findings (continued)Answering the high number of 911 calls

overwhelmed the police and left them little time for crime prevention

Detectives solved only a small percentage of the crimes; the majority of solved cases hinged on information obtained by patrol officers

10UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 11: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

RecommendationsNeed for formal call-screening procedures to

differentiate between emergency and nonemergency calls

When not handling calls, the officers could more profitably spend time addressing specific criminal activities, instead of performing randomized patrols.

Police could identify the community “hot spots” and reduce the number of repeated calls to these locations.

11UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 12: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Recommendations (continued)Patrol officers should become knowledgeable

about their beats through “beat-profiling” activities (studying the demographics and call histories).

Officers should develop “tailored patrol” strategies to address the types of crime and citizen concerns revealed by their profiling activities.

Officers must be assigned to permanent shifts and beats if they are to participate in community activities.

12UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 13: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Benefits of COPInteraction can improve the

attitudes of officers toward their jobs and the communities they serve, which encourages the officers to develop creative solutions to complex problems.

13UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 14: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Benefits of COP (continued)Officers are able to obtain

valuable information about criminal activity and perpetrators by getting to know members of the community.

Officers can obtain realistic assessments of community members’ needs and their expectations of police services.

14UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 15: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Challenges of COPDecentralization of decision-making

Officers are more comfortable with a structured leadership.

Need for retrainingThis can be a huge shock to traditional officers

who see the public as their enemy.Crime displacement versus elimination

Is crime eliminated or moved to another part of the community that is less vocal about it?

15UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 16: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Challenges of COPAcceptance by biased

communities who may have a preconceived, negative stereotype of police

Tyranny of neighborhoodsSuppresses persons who are

considered objectionable

16UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 17: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

Skills NeededAttentiveNon-judgmentalEffective communicationResourcefulOpen-mindedFlexible to changeProblem-solvingHard-workingOutgoing

17UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 18: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

S.A.R.A., a COP MethodScanning – gather data to define the

problemAnalysis – determine the nature of the

problem, causes, and possible solutionsResponse – work with people, groups, and

agencies to implement solutionsAssessment – follow up on the initiatives

taken

18UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.

Page 19: Law Enforcement II. Objectives The student will be able to: Define terms associated with COP. Compare and contrast traditional law enforcement with COP.

ResourcesU.S. Department of Justice

http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/commp.pdf National Center for Community Policing

http://www.cj.msu.edu/~people/cp/20year.html

Community Oriented Policing Services http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/Default.asp?Item=36

020547893X, Criminal Justice (Second Edition), James A. Fagin 19

UNT in partnership with TEA, Copyright ©. All rights reserved.


Recommended