+ All Categories
Home > Documents > LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

Date post: 23-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: minowa
View: 40 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010. Provide 14-GeV (?) electron bypass line from sector-20 around LCLS-I , feeding new undulators south of LCLS-I at 2 to 4-deg angle Use existing PEP-II 9-GeV line on linac ceiling (2’ above & 2’ south of linac) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
19
LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010 Provide 14-GeV (?) electron bypass line from sector-20 around LCLS-I, feeding new undulators south of LCLS-I at 2 to 4-deg angle Use existing PEP-II 9-GeV line on linac ceiling (2’ above & 2’ south of linac) Sneak line around crowded BSY and BTHW Bore new hole in 17-m thick iron m-plug wall Preserve 0.6-mm emittance with up to 3 kA at 14 GeV Include diagnostics and corrections in design
Transcript
Page 1: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

LCLS-II Bypass Line Design GoalsP. Emma, July 7, 2010

Provide 14-GeV (?) electron bypass line from sector-20 around LCLS-I, feeding new undulators south of LCLS-I at 2 to 4-deg angleUse existing PEP-II 9-GeV line on linac ceiling (2’ above & 2’ south of linac)Sneak line around crowded BSY and BTHWBore new hole in 17-m thick iron m-plug wallPreserve 0.6-mm emittance with up to 3 kA at 14 GeVInclude diagnostics and corrections in design

Page 2: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

Bypass-Line ComponentsExtract beam out at 20-5 (use half of sec-20 RF)Rolled x/y bends to existing 9-GeV PEP-II line(Existing PEP-II extraction bends blow up LCLS emittance by factor of 4 – redesigned here)Use 1-km of existing FODO cells (bmax = 400 m)

Also use long FODO as emittance diagnosticRemove 4.6-mrad pitch of linac (as in LCLS-I)Bend south with LCLS bend-cells (four 1-deg cells)Keep beamline at bypass line height (25.5” up)Bore new tunnel in hill 25.5” higher than LCLS-IAdd final wire scanner section & undulator matching (+ room for ECHO seeding)

Page 3: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

47”

66”

Inside Linac Vault - Looking Down-Beam

120”

132”

LINAC

25.512”

25.512”

9-GeV17” 3-GeV

(ID-344-013-30)

Page 4: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

LCLS-II Bypass Layout

Dx = 25.5”

PLAN VIEW

ELEVATION VIEW

N

Sector 20-517-m thick m-plug wall

17-m thick m-plug wall

Dy = 25.5”

Page 5: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

Sector-20(20-5)

m-plug wall

2324 26 28 30

25 27 29existing quads on ceiling

Page 6: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

m-plug walleight 0.5-deg bends

Page 7: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

LCLS-I Head-House Layout(R. M. Boyce)

Page 8: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

South-Side Head-House Port

~5 m

Page 9: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

Linac Tunnel Approaching BSY

Bypass Line will pass through

most congested area in BSY

Bypass Line will pass through

most congested area in BSY

LINAC

SIT Lineto PEP-II

Page 10: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

Quadrupole magnet here?

Page 11: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010
Page 12: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010
Page 13: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010
Page 14: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

problem area

Page 15: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

Twiss functions in Elegant

Page 16: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

With CSR (uniform temporal dist.) – note that ISR is no problem

gex,y = 0.6 mm

Page 17: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

Longitudinal phase space at 13.6 GeV, 3 kA, with CSR(uniform temporal dist.)

Page 18: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

Energy spread (green) & bunch length (red) vs. z

Page 19: LCLS-II Bypass Line Design Goals P. Emma, July 7, 2010

QuestionsIs this 2-4-deg option the choice (2 other options exist, but all need a bypass line)?Will we run at 7 GeV/360 Hz, or 14 GeV/120 Hz, or both (assuming both for now)?Can a new hole be bored in the 17-m thick m-plug wall ?Can we tunnel the new undulator hall 25.5” higher in elevation than LCLS-I ?Do we need a jumper line from LCLS-I to LCLS-II, and the reverse?Do we want a horizontal spreader to someday feed 2 undulators in the new hall ?


Recommended