+ All Categories
Home > Documents > LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

Date post: 16-Oct-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 4 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
Use of Dynamically Downscaled Climate Projections for the Lower Santa Cruz River Basin Progress Report January 19, 2018 Dr. Hsin-I Chang Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

Use of Dynamically Downscaled Climate Projections for the Lower Santa Cruz River Basin

Progress Report

January 19, 2018Dr. Hsin-I Chang

Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of [email protected]

Page 2: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

Climate Simulation Downscaling Methodology

Regional Climate Products• North America• Statistical (LOCA)• Dynamical – (RCP 8.5 only)

provided by Univ. of Arizona, # of grid points: 1511 x 651, size per point 25 km x 25km

DownscalingStatistical vs Dynamical

Extract climate data for LSCRB study region

# of grid points: 124x124, Size per point: 25 km x 25 km

IPCC Emissions Scenarios• RCP 4.5 (Lower Risk)• RCP 8.5 (Higher Risk)

Global Climate Models• Size per point:

209 km x 209 km• Supply climate

projection information for regional climate model simulation

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Hsin-I – make sure you emphasize that the figure on the far right is to demonstrate the concept– there are actually many more grid squares than those that are shown in the picture.,
Page 3: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

Dynamically Downscaled Climate Products used to date

• 3 IPCC global climate projections identified (High Risk Scenario)• GFDL (United States)• MPI-ECHAM6 (Germany)• HadGEM2 (United Kingdom)

• Regional climate model used: • WRF (Weather Research and Forecasting model)

Data Source: University of ArizonaNorth American Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (NA-CORDEX)

Page 4: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

Current Status [WRF-MPI 25km]

• Precipitation climatology data processing: 1950 – 2070• Temperature climatology data processing: 1950 – 2070• Daily extreme precipitation analysis: 1950 – 2070 • Daily extreme temperature analysis: 1950 – 2070

Page 5: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

Climate Analysis Metrics from Partner Input

• Extreme event: intensity and frequency• Daily precipitation• Daily temperature change

• Monsoon onset: timing • Five-day running average of daily precipitation

• Length of dry period before monsoon onset: timing

Page 6: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

Best precipitation climatology: WRF-MPI Summer projection: 5-10% reductionWinter projection: 30-50% reduction

c

WRF-MPI(1971 -2000)

Tucson Airport 1971 – 2000

WRF-MPI(2001 - 2040)

Average Monthly Precipitation, WRF-MPI over LSCR Basin

Prec

ipita

tion,

mm

/mon

th

1 inch (25.4 mm)

Page 7: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

WRF-MPI: Top 10% Daily Precipitation Events [Aug]

WRF-MPI1950 - 2010

WRF-MPI2011 - 2070

25.4 mm = 1 inch

25.4 mm = 1 inch

• Max. rainfall threshold reduced: 150 mm/day 90 mm/day• Extreme rainfall PDF shifted toward lower threshold

Page 8: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

WRF-Reanalysis: top 10% Daily Precipitation Events [Aug, 1950-2010]

25.4 mm = 1 inch

# of

eve

nts

Precipitation, (mm/day)

Page 9: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

WRF-MPI: Top 10% Daily Precipitation Events [Dec]

• Max. rainfall threshold increased: 23 mm/day 30 mm/day• Extreme rainfall PDF shifted toward lower threshold

25.4 mm = 1 inch

25.4 mm = 1 inch

WRF-MPI1950 - 2010

WRF-MPI2011 - 2070

Page 10: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

WRF-MPI: Top 10% of average Daily Temperatures [Aug]

• More extreme temperature days over 100F• Extreme temperature PDF shifted toward

higher threshold

WRF-MPI1950 - 2010

WRF-MPI2011 - 2070

# of

eve

nts

Page 11: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

• More high temperature extreme days

• Extreme temperature distribution peaking between 50-70F

WRF-MPI: Top 10% of average Daily Temperatures [Dec]

Page 12: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

WRF-MPI: Change in number of extreme values by thresholds

More extreme warm days, a lot less days with high rainfall for both winter and summer

(F) 9 - 16 17 - 25 26 – 34 35 - 43 44 - 52 53 – 61 62 – 70 71 – 79 80 – 88 89 – 97 98 – 106 107 - 117

9 - 16 17 - 25 26 – 34 35 - 43 44 - 52 53 – 61 62 – 70 71 – 79 80 – 88 89 – 97 98 – 106 107 - 117

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Is this a comparison between the periods 1950 – 2010 and 2011 – 2070? If so, please say so.
Page 13: LCSB progress report - usbr.gov

Summary: LSCR Basin Climate Analysis

• Proposed methodology approach demonstration using metric suggested by study partners – comments?

• Is there agreement on this methodology?

• The ‘best performing’ climate model (WRF-MPI) predicts more warm days, less high rainfall days by the end of 2070

• Ongoing Activities:• Same analysis for other NA-CORDEX simulations (GFDL, HadGEM2)• Compare with observations and LOCA data


Recommended