Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 1
Leading for Differentiation:Growing the Teachers Who Grow the Kids
ASCD Annual ConferenceThree-Day Preconference Institute
March 30 – April 1, 2016Carol Ann Tomlinson and Michael Murphy
Who’s in this room?
Essential Questions to Guide Our Exploration of Leading Differentiation:
1) Why is now the right time for this change to differentiated teaching practices? Are we up to the challenge?
2) When thinking about differentiation, are we talking about school change or people change?
3) What constitutes differentiation “success”?4) Are we focusing on the right things to maintain this
change?5) What are good conversations leaders can develop and
conduct about differentiation?6) Why will we be confounded about the differentiation
implementation issues that pop up and what do we do about those issues?
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 2
Our Learning Community Suggestions:
• Participation and questions
• Schedule adherence
• Technology management
• Collaboration and dialogue with others
• Application
Let’s do some advance organizing for today. . .
Find three partners
who don’t usually work
with you!
Why is now the right time for this change? Are we up to the challenge?
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 3
Taking a moment . . .
1) It takes quite a while for meaningful differentiation to take hold and flourish.
2) Growth may be uneven and requires leaders to stay the course.
3) Leading differentiation requires trust in our students and trust in our teachers.
4) Effective leaders of differentiation must know the difference between “power over” and “power to”
1) Choose a partner or two.
2) Take one of the previous questions and just talk back and forth.
3) We’ll see what your thoughts are in about four minutes.
Who’s Coming
to School these Days?
9
Second language learners
Students with learning
challenges
Students from low-income
backgrounds
Advanced learners
Students who are homeless
Students with emotional challenges
Students from “non-majority”
races or cultures
Students whose families move
often
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 4
Seeing the Faces of these Students . . .
1) Who are the “faces” that you are advocating the most for?
2) How would you present your “argument” for why differentiated instruction is so vital—in your schools and district(s)?
• Teachers need to know where each student begins and is in his/her journey to meeting the criteria of the lesson.
• What are his or her strengths and gaps in knowledge and understanding?
• What learning strategies does he or she have and how can we help him or her to develop other useful learning strategies?
John Hattie on Differentiation:
12
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 5
John Hattie on Differentiation:
• The teacher will have to provide different ways in which students can demonstrate mastery and understanding along the way to meeting the criteria for success.
• Rapid formative feedback can be very powerful.
13
• Teaching the class as a whole is unlikely to pitch the lesson correctly for all students.
• Differentiation relates primarily to structuring classes so that all students are working at or “+1” from where they start.
14
15
• All classes are full of heterogeneity, which is likely advantageous because students can learn from one another.
• An art of teaching is seeing the commonality among the differences and having peers work together around those commonalities.
• Note that differentiation relates more to addressing students’ different phases of learning (from novice to capable to proficient) rather than merely providing different activities to different groups or students.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 6
16
• The key is for teachers to have a clear reason for differentiation and to relate what they do differently to where the student is located on a progression of learning related to the topic at hand.
• In grouping students, the goal is to group students at varied places in the progression so students can move forward as they discuss with, work with, and see the world through the eyes of other students.
• In order for grouping to be effective, it requires structure and instruction for students to develop the skills necessary for those things to happen.
17
To care about each student . . .To care for each student . . .Because it is the professional thing to do.Because it is the ethical thing to do..
--Lorna Earl (2003). Assessment as Learning
The teacher’s overriding moral purpose is to meet the needs of students, even when
it conflicts with personal preferences.
How does John Hattie make us think about the way we teach today? Ought to be teaching?
What is your reason for differentiation—ethical, research, or demographic?
18
Find your breakfast partner . . .
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 7
Are we up to the challenge? Are WE clear on what differentiation is and what it’s not?
Now that you have shared your ideas on the “what” of differentiation . . .
What Differentiation Is: What Differentiation is Not:
Use the laminated mats at your places to share common understandings and misunderstandings you
encounter as you lead differentiation!
20
21
“Differentiation is a sequence of common sense decisions made by teachers with a student-first
orientation.”--Adam Hoppe, 2010
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 8
Ensuring an environment that actively supports studentsin the work of learning (mindset, connections, community),
Absolute clarity about a powerful learning destination—(KUDs, engagement, understanding),
Persistently knowing where students are in relationto the destination all along the way,
Adjusting teaching to make sure each student arrives at the destination (and, when possible, moves beyond it), and
Effective leadership & management of flexible classroom routines.22
The Hallmark of Effective Teaching:
Environment, Curriculum, Assessment, Instruction & Leadership/Management
Working Together 23
Implications?
Leaders Need to:• Understand the essential elements
of differentiation• Develop and share a compelling
rationale for differentiation and share it compellingly with stakeholders
• Model differentiation for their teachers.
• Provide intelligent and sustained support for teachers to develop with DI.
Teachers Need to:• Understand the essential elements of
DI and how they work together to benefit students.
• Learn to implement the elements in their practice with growing competence.
• Develop and maintain a personal growth plan for DI.
• Collaborate with colleagues to benefit their own growth and their students’ growth.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 9
1) Find a “fence partner” or two. 2) How ready are you to lead
differentiation?3) What are the implications for
the way you lead differentiation in terms of:
1) Communication?2) Resources?3) Professional learning?4) Momentum and motivation?
Do people change or do schools change?
Let’s start by exploring what happened to Culver Elementary School . . .
Quickly skim the case study at your tables.
With your table mates, answer the three questions at the end of the second page.
Be ready to report!
27
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 10
Culver and the Orchestration of Change:
28
Is it school change or individual change?
Are there predictable phases?
Can it be accelerated? Adjusted?
The Mindset Shift:
Thinking about it . . . Consistent and effective practice
The “Implementation Bridge”30
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 11
Schools and adults progress in predictable phases during long-term change.The “implementation dip” is a predictable dip in performance during early
implementation.
Initial Steps: InitiationDeeply Embedded: Institutionalization
Beginning Work: Implementation
Where the work feels
really hard!
Motivation and Change Over Time:
Adult Motivation
Autonomy
Purpose
Mastery & Competence
--Deci and Faste, 1996; Pink, 2009
Autonomy:Time
Task
Technique
Team
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 12
Purpose:
Factor #2:
Clarity
Factor #1:
Priority
Mastery & Competence:
Growth
Self-efficacy
Success intervals
What do the long-term change phases and motivation theory make you think about?
Think about one major initiative you have been working on. Now think of two teachers who are INTRINSICALLY MOTIVATED to realize the change. What does that tell
you about the three motivators? About your work?
36
Find your lunch partner . . .
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 13
Initial Steps: InitiationDeeply Embedded: Institutionalization
Beginning Work: Implementation
Where the work feels
really hard!
38
Start with Why . . .
Why
How
WhatTHE GOLDEN CIRCLE
“There are only two waysto influence human behavior.You can manipulate it, oryou can inspire it.”
--Sinek, Simon (2009). Start with Why. New York:Portfolio/Penguin, pp. 11 & 37.
How are we keeping people focused on this change? The power of VISION
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 14
What we find in practice . . .• There are many different interpretations of
“what differentiation is.” Therefore:• It helps to define what excellence in
differentiation looks like for teachers, so they have an agreed-upon set of markers that will help the school as a whole move toward quality implementation.
• This will help people remember the “purpose” for differentiation.
• A vision for differentiation will help people understand how that initiative “fits” with the overall school vision and goals.
40
• The principles, practices, and potential to propel the work
• “What will we achieve if we reach our moral purpose?
• WHY we are doing the work
Vision
• Concrete descriptions of what will be different as a result of deeply embedded differentiation
• Serves as a communication tool and the ultimate target
• The WHAT of the work to achieve the moral purpose
Operational Vision for
Differentiation
• Short-term plans to achieve the operational vision
• Establishes the “floor” for growth that year
• Describes the HOW for each year in the journey
Yearly Change Plans
41
Differentiation Vision 101:
The operational vision for differentiation is the WHAT—the DETAILED description of what it will look like when your ideas for differentiated
instruction are achieved.
It is not the school vision or mission. It “fits” within the overall school vision to show how THIS INITIATIVE will look to help you achieve your overall
vision.
The operational vision should feel energizing, challenging, and motivating.
The operational vision should be written in terms of a) students, b) teachers, and c) how the school is organized to support differentiation.
The operational vision serves as a communication and an evaluation mechanism for this initiative.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 15
Differentiation Vision Insights:The entire visioning process can be completed in about 2 hours.
The process can be accomplished with the entire team (or faculty).
The leader should facilitate the process.
Minimal supplies are needed for the process.
How do we orchestrate a vision for differentiation? A simulation . . .
Key Ideas for Your Consideration:
• Adopt an “organic approach” to the beginning work.
• Engage in “storytelling” to set the stage.
• Ensure “what differentiation is and what it’s not” before you start.
• Check on individual “worries” about the work.
45
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 16
Step #1: “Here to There”Work in table groups to get a sense of the current state of differentiation:
1. Discuss your impressions of “what differentiation is” in terms of your present knowledge and skill.
2. Generate short word or phrase descriptions of “what you think about when you think of differentiation or try to explain it.”
3. Collect all ideas from your table. Determine your “best” and most useful and/or honest ideas to post.
4. Record each of those responses on a sentence strip and post all of them on the designated chart paper or wall.
5. Participate in a gallery walk and notice what is being said.
46
Leading for Differentiation:Growing the Teachers Who Grow the Kids
ASCD Annual ConferenceThree-Day Preconference Institute
March 30 – April 1, 2016Carol Ann Tomlinson and Michael Murphy
Day
Step #1: “Here to There”Work in table groups to get a sense of the current state of differentiation:
1. Discuss your impressions of “what differentiation is” in terms of your present knowledge and skill.
2. Generate short word or phrase descriptions of “what you think about when you think of differentiation or try to explain it.”
3. Collect all ideas from your table. Determine your “best” and most useful and/or honest ideas to post.
4. Record each of those responses on a sentence strip and post all of them on the designated chart paper or wall.
5. Participate in a gallery walk and notice what is being said.
48
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 17
49
Step #2: When we have realized our VISION for differentiation, how will things be different for:
• Students?
• Teachers?
• School structures?
“How will our school be
changed? What will be different
in the classrooms for students?
For teachers?
In the way the school works?
Individual “Idea Writing”
50
Step #3: Now, focus only on your assigned area . . .
1) Using your index cards, share all of your ideas about your assigned area
2) Brainstorm and list and prioritize and/or combine.
3) Decide on your 5-8 “best” ideas and write each on a piece of cardstock and post them.
• Students?
• Teachers?
• School structures?
“What will be
different?”
51
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 18
52
Step #4: Talk and prioritizing . . .
1) Study and clarify through discussion or some other process.
2) Add detail to any/all ideas posted.
3) Add additional ideas.
4) Prioritize!
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 19
Step #5 Option: Group writing of the OPERATIONAL
VISION in draft form . . .
At (name of our district or county), we are committed to developing and
institutionalizing differentiation, where:
Students are:
Teachers are:
The school is organized to:
55
Step #5 Option: A Writing Team
Form a small writing team who will look at the prioritized ideas and draft an operational vision for the staff to review.
56
57
In the Culver School District, we are committed to the highest level of implementation of differentiated practices, where
Students:•Are involved in setting their own goals for academic progress and monitor their achievement through interaction and collaboration with teachers and peers;•Use accountable talk during cooperative and collaborative learning experiences to provide academic feedback to each other; an d•Are stakeholders of their own learning and mastery and engage in learning activities that challenge them and give them a sense of success.
Teachers:•Collaborate with each other to study the curriculum standards and ensure deep implementation of strategies that have proven results;•Develop a deep resource base of possible activities, materials, assessments, and lessons;•Use formative assessment to drive their instruction to personalize skill-specific, learning style, and small group achievement; and•Capitalize on their individual strengths and match those strengths to deliver the best possible instruction to flexible group s of students.
The Schools:•Each operate an efficient master schedule that allows for teachers to collaboratively plan, capitalize on their strengths, an d deliver quality instruction to fluid groups of students;•Conduct ongoing, school-based professional development to deepen knowledge of differentiation and require effective implementation; and•Build in regular celebrations of staff effort and student results.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 20
*Ensuring an environment that actively supports studentsin the work of learning (mindset, connections, community)
*Absolute clarity about a powerful learning destination—(KUDs, engagement, understanding)
*Persistently knowing where students are in relationto the destination all along the way
*Adjusting teaching to make sure each student arrives at the destination (and, when possible, moves beyond it)
*Effective leadership & management of flexible classroom routines
Step #6: Verification and Assessment of the Operational Vision
1) Does our OPERATIONAL
VISION address these
areas?
58
2) Check on Clarity?
Dig Deep with Your Last Partner:1) Go over the content for today
and some of the processes we used. What questions do you have?
2) What specific clarity do you need?
59
Creating “change plans” to strategically move the work . . .
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 21
Getting Ready
Deeply Embedded
Beginning Work
Change Plan Year OneChange Plan Year Two
Change Plan Year Three
61
Change Plan Year One
The VISION for the SCHOOL
Conversations and Informal Assessment of Progress
Change Plan Year Two
Change Plan Year Three
Change Plan Year Four
Change Plan Year Five
62
A First Year Change Plan Example from the Greeneville City Schools (TN):
63
Principals and teachers can verbalize the fundamentals of differentiation
Teachers are implementing individualized plans to experiment in differentiation
Teachers’ use of low prep differentiation strategies are being regularly discussed in team or department
meetings
The schools are structured to use early release days and monthly meetings to discuss differentiation practices and
plans
Teachers are sharing information about students they gathered from informal classroom assessments
Principals are using informal communication and individual conferences to promote differentiation
practices
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 22
Are we focusing on the right things to keep it going?
One of the Right Things = A Sense of “Where Each Person Is” in the Work
• The art of moving the organization forward while tending to individual differences
• Leading toward the vision
• Learning about the current “state”
• Assessing progress and momentum
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 23
What BEHAVIORS are Changing and How?
Preparing for the work?
Mechanically implementing some ideas?
Routinely implementing some ideas?
Refined, sophisticated, teaching and
learning?
•Doing the work at all?•At a pretty low proficiency?
•Showing persistent experimentation?•Enjoying routine high proficiency?
67
68
“Those who know WHY
need those who know (WHAT &) HOW.”
Why
What
How
Three Avenues to Success
1) Staff developer/coach• “From the outside”• Teacher-auditioned• Long-term• In classrooms• Distributed leadership
2) Teacher liaison• “From the inside”• Teacher-trust• Long-term• In classrooms• Distributed leadership
3) Coaches & DI Team• Long term• In classrooms• Distributed leadership--Sinek, Simon (2009). Start with Why. New York:Portfolio/Penguin, pp. 140 & 37.
69
Key DI Element Low Proficiency High Proficiency
Learning Environment Flat or RigidFixed MindsetLow Teacher-
StudentConnections
“Unsafe” for SomeStudents
General Awareness of, Respect for Students
General Teacher-Student Connections
Still Largely Fixed MindsetSome Community Building
General TeacherEmotional Support
Growth Mindset FairlyConsistent
General Sense of Community
Most Students Seem to“Belong”
Teacher Emotional Support for all Students
Class Works, Supports OneAnother Like a Team
High Teacher-Student Connections
Feels Like a Good “Home” forall Students
Curriculum Fact, Skills BasedRight-Answer
OrientedLow RelevanceLow Goal Clarity
Some Goal ClarityMore CoherentMore Focus on UnderstandingMore Thoughtful
Consistent Goal ClarityUnderstanding often
EmphasizedPlanned for Engagement
Understanding-FocusedHigh RelevanceHigh AuthenticityIncludes Student Voice
Assessment Of LearningFact & Skills BasedLow AlignmentLittle Emphasis on
Understanding
FOR LearningSome AlignmentSome Emphasis on
Understanding
FOR LearningGeneral AlignmentRegularly Studies
StudentsFocused Feedback
FOR & AS LearningTight AlignmentAuthentic, Understanding-
FocusedDifferentiated
Instruction Teacher-CenteredMostly One-Size-
Fits-AllLow Alignment
Student ChoiceBetter Alignment Low PrepReactive Differentiation
Interest/Learning Profile Differentiation Prevail
Generally ProactiveDifferentiation
Generally Good AlignmentFlexible Grouping
High AlignmentRegularly Teaches UpStrong Readiness
DifferentiationRespectful Tasks
Leadership & Management
Compliance-FocusedRule-OrientedLow Trust of StudentsManages Kids
Some FlexibilityFollowing Rules Still
often TrumpsStudent Needs
Some Opportunity for FlexibleLearning
Carefully Plans & TeachesRoutines
Teacher Explains his/herThinking to Students, Seeks Student Input
Empowers Students toAssist in Varied Ways
Elicits Student Input on Improving Learning
Philosophy-GuidedStudent-CenteredLearning-OrientedFull Student-Teacher
PartnershipLeads Kids, Manages Routines
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 24
A Differentiated Science TaskBased on Multiple Intelligences
V/L
Write a story
about your
planet
L/M
Make a chart
that
compares
your planet
to Earth
M/R
Make up a
song about
your planet
B/K
Make up or
adapt a
game about
your planet
(Saturn ring-
toss, etc.)
70
New World Explorers
KNOW
• Key biographical information on two “New World Explorers”
• Key contributions of the two explorers
UNDERSTAND
• Exploration involves
– risk
– costs and benefits
– success and failure
DO
• Use resource materials to illustrate
& support ideas71
New World Explorers
Using a teacher-provided list of resources and list of product options, show how 2 key explorers took chances, experienced success and failure, and brought about both positive and negative change. Provide proof/evidence.
Using reliable and defensible research, develop a way to show how New World Explorers were paradoxes. Include and go beyond the unit principles.
72
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 25
How can adults continue to learn and progress so their implementation becomes deeper, more sophisticated, and long-
lasting?
Three Purposes of Professional
Learning
Individual Development
Team and School
Improvement
Program Implementation
75
Student Results
What is Success for Students?
What Do Adults Need to Learn to Do Better?
How Will We Know if
We Have Achieved it?
What is the Next Step?
With Adults
With Students
What’s the Issue?
Differentiated Teaching and
Learning
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 26
Please resolve at your tables:
�What does this make you think about?
�What is done well? Not so well?
�How does your school or district address the purposes for professional learning?
�How does your school or district address this sequence we discussed?
76
Communities of learners working
together on improvement
Strategic leadership of
adult learning and development
Smart utilization of resources to
support improvement
Use of ongoing data to determine if progress is being
made
Different learning designs over time
A focus on implementation,
not seat time
Connecting improvement with desired outcomes
Source: LearningForward.org
Standards for Professional Learning:
77
1) Study together.
2) Read the case study and find evidence of the Standards in Villegas’ work.
3) See if this work generates any questions for us.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 27
Getting ReadyDeeply Embedded
Beginning Work
Preparation Mechanical Routine Refined
How teachers may be behaving in relation to the change
79
If TRAINING is your primary model:
80
• Training is valuable for gaining knowledge only.
• Training may be the worst method for implementation.
• Very few teachers will attend training on differentiation and implement anything they learned without additional strategic support!
Professional Learning Element
Effects on Knowledge Effects on Short-Term
Use (%)
Effects on Long-Term
Use (%)
Theory, readings, discussions, lectures, trainings
Positive 5-10% 5-10%
All + demonstrations Positive 5-20% 5-20%
All + demonstrations + collaborative planning of units or lessons
Positive 80-90% 5-10%
All + demonstrations + planning of units + peer/collegial coaching
Positive 90%+ 90%+
81
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 28
Getting Ready
Deeply Embedded
Beginning Work
82
Look at the long-term change diagram:Study the “effective designs” chart and
connect the dots:– Based on “where you are” in differentiation,
what designs may be needed to move this initiative along?
– What needs to happen to implement these adult learning strategies?
The effectiveness depends partly on the culture you help develop . . .
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 29
Developing Trust: A Three-Part Solution85
Team and School Improvement Trust
Facets
86
Leading for Differentiation:Growing the Teachers Who Grow the Kids
ASCD Annual ConferenceThree-Day Preconference Institute
March 30 – April 1, 2016Carol Ann Tomlinson and Michael Murphy
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 30
ResourcesLearning More about DifferentiationThe Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of all Learners (2nd Ed.)Leading & Managing a Differentiated ClassroomDifferentiation in Middle & High School: Strategies to Engage all LearnersDifferentiation and the Brain: How Neuroscience Supports the Learner Friendly Classroom
Learning more about Leading for DifferentiationThe Differentiated School: Making Revolutionary Changes in Teaching & Learning
Learning More about LeadershipThe New Meaning of Educational Change (4th Ed.)Trust Matters: Leadership for Successful Schools (Megan Tschannen-Moran)Learning Forward: Standards for Professional LearningCrucial Accountability
Planning for Effective Differentiation: A Warm Up
1) Turn to pp. 98-99 in the “leadership book.” Quickly review the rubric.
2) Listen to a teacher’s sequence ofthinking and planning for differentiation.
3) Jot down key insights as we go through the teacher’s plans.
89
Analyze how particular elements
of a story or drama interact (e.g.,
how setting shapes the characters
or plot).
Grade 7 Common Core Reading Standards for Literature
Unpack this Standard: What Might its KUDs Be?
Identifying KUDs—Beginning with a Standard
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 31
Analyze how particular elements of a story or drama interact (e.g., how setting shapes the characters or plot).
Grade 7 Common Core Reading
Standards for Literature
KnowElements of fiction (plot, setting, character, theme)Analysis, evidence, interaction, supporting a position
UnderstandElements in our lives affect us and affect one another.
The people we associate with help shape us—and we help shape them.Time of day, weather, where we are, the music we hear all impact our
mood, thoughts, and actions.The “themes” of our lives that most strongly represent who we are and
what we stand for shape our thoughts, lives, and actions.Authors use the elements of fiction in purposeful ways to guide readers’ thinking.Stories are representations of life and in that way, act like our lives do.Each element in a story shapes every other element in the story.
DoRecognize the elements in a story.Analyze how the elements interact—and why.Provide evidence from the story to support
their explanation.
1. Explain in words or words and images how you think our lives are like the lives of characters
in a story or a movie or a play.
2. What are the elements of fiction? Please define or describe the elements you list.
3. How would you explain to a fourth grader what you do when you analyze something?
4. What do you think the most important theme in your life is? In other words, what theme
does the best job of capturing who you are and what you stand for?
Name_____________________________________ Class Period________________
A pre-assessment to determine students’ entry points with critical knowledge, understanding and skill
related to interaction among elements of fiction
Patterns from the Elements of Literature Pre-Assessment
How our lives are like the lives of characters in movies or plays:Some students provided shallow, evident, concrete answersOther students provided more thoughtful and abstract answers, generally making
either more connections that were meaningful or more elaborated anddeeper connections.
Elements of Fiction6 students listed and accurately explained all of the key elements12 students listed at least 3 elements and explained most of them with general accuracy11 students left the answer blank or listed just 1-2 elements and provided ambiguous
or incorrect explanations
Explaining analysisOnly two students provided an effective, step-by-step response that would be helpful in
understanding how to analyze something.
Major theme in your lifeA large group of students noted topics (I like sports)7 students provided a theme-like statement and shared how/why it represented themA large group of students left the answer blank or provided a brief response not readily
connected with the question
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 32
Whole Class Differentiated
Discussion on elements in our lives and how they interact.
Introduction to unit.Review of elements of literature using matching exercise in which some students have cards w/ element names, some have definitions, some have examples from stories students have read in common.Discussion of things we analyze in our daily lives and how we go about it—create a set of steps in analysis.
Students work in quads or triads to analyze a story to identify story elements and analyze how they work together. Group size, story choice, and graphic organizer used to guide work will vary based on pre-assessment results. Teacher will meet with small groups throughout the class period.
Whole class review of theme, proposing themes in lives of famous people, analyzing how they arrived at those themes.
Practice with themes in brief “stories” –Stories vary in mode, complexity, support. Varied organizers.Identify and support your conclusion—Identify and show howthe elements contribute to a theme.
Identify and demonstrate how the elements contributeDevelop a story in which elements interact to point to a theme—Varied directions, organizers, supports, modes of
expression.
Earl
y Le
arn
ing
Seq
uen
ce in
th
e “I
nte
ract
ion
of
Elem
ents
in
Fic
tio
n”
Un
it
An Early Summative Performance Task in the Interaction of Elements Unit
Develop a 50-word story from your life as a way to show how authors use elements in a story or drama to
guide readers’ thinking around a theme. Your work must include two parts: (1) the brief story you tell,
and (2) your explanation of how you used the elements of fiction to shape a message around a theme.
The story—while no more than 50 words—must include a plot/storyline, characters, setting, theme
interacting in a coherent way to evoke an important idea in readers. The story may be written, animated,
or in the form of a word & image collage. Your explanation must include a clear explanation of how
you developed your story using the elements of fiction. Include drafts and an explanation of why
your drafts evolved as they did to ensure you used the elements well in supporting your theme.
50-W
ord
Sto
ry
Differentiation in the Performance Task
1. Format options provided (write, animate, collage).
2. Think-Tank Groups available for brainstorming.
3. Graphic organizers provided for students with varied challenges in writing, organizing ideas, language. One organizer supported thinking through the story. A
second one posed questions that led to the analysis/explanation portion of the task.
4. English language learners had the option of writing the story in their first language and recording the English version.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 33
On the pier, fishing with my dad, the sun and salt made me powerful.
I reeled in my line with a swagger, a sardine-like fish on the end.
My runt brother caught a monster.
My dad took his picture.
I got a sunburn.
Big brother dethroned again.
My first two drafts were way too long. My idea wasn’t clear enough to me so I had to think some
more.
I chose a sunny day with salt air because that always makes me feel strong, but sometimes that
can go to your head and sun can burn you. I think that happens when we feel like we are such a
big deal that we don’t have to pay attention to the rules of nature.
My little brother was a good protagonist. I should be able to win pretty much any contest with
him because I am older and wiser. Mostly, though, he wins because he’s little and cute and
get’s everybody’s attention. But sometimes, like in this story, he wins because I get too full of myself,
and it’s kind of like nature burns me to keep me in my place.
A Video Warm Up: Looking inside a Differentiated Class
1) Listen to the principal talk aboutdifferentiation. What’s her “why”?What influence would you assume she has had on the way the teacher we’ll watch isworking?
2) What would you say to the teacher in thevideo about his/her work?
3) What sense of possibilities or trepidation does thevideo create for you?
99
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 34
What constitutes differentiation “success”?
Big Ideas about Knowing the Degree of Success:
Progress
Outputs Outcomes
•How we are “doing things”•Assessing our processes and/or leading indicators•Assessment
•How the work is “working”•What are the eventual results?•Evaluation
What has been our experience?
“Testing the soil” has usually meant:A focus on starting the work rather than
supporting it long-term;
No regular communication of progress so motivation slows or stops; and
One-dimensional evaluation of results in terms of student achievement only.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 35
Critical to the Work:
• Looking at program progress much in the same way we hope teachers look at student progress
• Becoming proficient in both assessing progress and evaluating growth, and knowing when to use which strategy
• Successful leaders for differentiation work with teachers in the same ways they will ask teachers to work with their students.
• That approach reflects the way people learn.
• It is also a potent demonstration of how differentiation should work.
Principal : Teacher :: Teacher : Student
The “implementation bridge” and two critical views of “success” . . .
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 36
Planning to implement practices Consistent and effective practice
How adults are responding to it Concern about impact
The “Implementation Bridge”
106
Leaders should consider TWO VIEWS:
107
Refocusing
Collaboration
Consequence
Management
Personal
Informational
Awareness
Usually “early on” in the work, before people are actually “doing” the change.
Management issues are related to time, schedules, materials, etc. Management issues are “good news, bad news”. It is only after management issues are resolved that the individual is more concerned about students than him/herself.
Where would you want to check on emotional or affective reactions to the change toward differentiation?
• Defend your response with a “fence partner” in the room.
• Discuss HOW you would find out individual’s reactions to differentiation.
Initiation
Implementation
Institutionalization
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 37
Assessing this First View:
Short, incidental, informal one-on-one conversations
Can be used as an intervention and as a way to diagnose the majority concerns or reactions to the change toward differentiation
The “One-Legged”
Individual Interview
How to Ask the One-Legged Interview Question (Emotional Response):
Refocusing
Collaboration
Consequence
Management
Personal
Informational
Awareness
“Think about the work we are doing in differentiation this year,
and how that is going for you. When you think about
differentiation and your efforts to differentiate your classroom, what
concerns you? What are you worried about?”
Get with someone close by . . .1) Role play this.
2) One of you be “A” and the other “B”.
3) First, the “A” person asks the one-legged interview question and probes.
4) The “B” person responds in the way you feel a typical person might respond (make it up!).
5) See if “A” can figure out what stage of concern “B” is communicating! If you are “A”, what would you do about “B’s” concerns?
6) Then switch roles and do it one more time.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 38
112
Integrated
Refined
Routine
Mechanical
Preparation
Orientation
Nonuse
Usually “early on” in the work, before people are actually “doing” the change.
When the change is actually being used in the classroom on a progressive and deeper basis. A combination of “good news/bad news” for the leader. No sustained impact on students until refined use.
113
Key DI Element Low Proficiency High Proficiency
Learning Environment Flat or RigidFixed MindsetLow Teacher-
StudentConnections
“Unsafe” for SomeStudents
General Awareness of, Respect for Students
General Teacher-Student Connections
Still Largely Fixed MindsetSome Community Building
General TeacherEmotional Support
Growth Mindset FairlyConsistent
General Sense of Community
Most Students Seem to“Belong”
Teacher Emotional Support for all Students
Class Works, Supports OneAnother Like a Team
High Teacher-Student Connections
Feels Like a Good “Home” forall Students
Curriculum Fact, Skills BasedRight-Answer
OrientedLow RelevanceLow Goal Clarity
Some Goal ClarityMore CoherentMore Focus on UnderstandingMore Thoughtful
Consistent Goal ClarityUnderstanding often
EmphasizedPlanned for Engagement
Understanding-FocusedHigh RelevanceHigh AuthenticityIncludes Student Voice
Assessment Of LearningFact & Skills BasedLow AlignmentLittle Emphasis on
Understanding
FOR LearningSome AlignmentSome Emphasis on
Understanding
FOR LearningGeneral AlignmentRegularly Studies
StudentsFocused Feedback
FOR & AS LearningTight AlignmentAuthentic, Understanding-
FocusedDifferentiated
Instruction Teacher-CenteredMostly One-Size-
Fits-AllLow Alignment
Student ChoiceBetter Alignment Low PrepReactive Differentiation
Interest/Learning Profile Differentiation Prevail
Generally ProactiveDifferentiation
Generally Good AlignmentFlexible Grouping
High AlignmentRegularly Teaches UpStrong Readiness
DifferentiationRespectful Tasks
Leadership & Management
Compliance-FocusedRule-OrientedLow Trust of StudentsManages Kids
Some FlexibilityFollowing Rules Still
often TrumpsStudent Needs
Some Opportunity for FlexibleLearning
Carefully Plans & TeachesRoutines
Teacher Explains his/herThinking to Students, Seeks Student Input
Empowers Students toAssist in Varied Ways
Elicits Student Input on Improving Learning
Philosophy-GuidedStudent-CenteredLearning-OrientedFull Student-Teacher
PartnershipLeads Kids, Manages Routines
How to Ask the One-Legged Interview Question to Assess this Second View (Behavior):
“Think about the work we are doing in differentiation this year,
and how that is going for you. When you think about
differentiation and your efforts to differentiate your classroom, can you describe what you are doing
and how it is looking?”
Integrated
Refined
Routine
Mechanical
Preparation
Orientation
Nonuse
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 39
Tom Guskey’s Framework as Applied to Our Work:
Level 1--Reactions to the change: Excitement, Perceptions, Concerns
Level 2--Learning in the group: Knowledge and Skills acquired by the adults who are affected by the change
Level 3--Structural or organizational changes they are making: Climate work, school schedule changes, implementation adjustments to give the change support to “stick”
Level 4--Application of what they learned: If and how the adults began using the change in their classrooms
Level 5--Student impact: Impact on the learners in terms of their cognition, behavior, or feelings about school and/or learning
Moving from “Means” to “Ends:
•Usually happens as implementation progresses, and the expectation is on more sophisticated differentiation use
•The “ultimate” goal of working with adults is so the work yields student growth:
– Cognitive outcomes
– Affective outcomes
– Psychomotor outcomes
Initiation
Implementation
Institutionalization
Aligning Guskey’s Framework and the Two Views . . .
Level 1--Reactions to the change: Excitement, Perceptions, Concerns
Level 2--Learning in the group: Knowledge and Skills acquired by the adults who are affected by the change
Level 3--Structural or organizational changes they are making--school schedule changes, implementation adjustments to give the change support to “stick”
Level 4--Application of what they learned: If and how the adults began using the change in their classrooms
Level 5--Student impact: Impact on the learners in terms of their cognition, behavior, or feelings about school and/or learning
Where would you assess how
they are responding to
differentiation? How they are
working with it?
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 40
What are good conversations leaders can develop and conduct about differentiation?
• Think about a particularly effective conversation you had last year with a colleague.
• What were the elements of that conversation that made it so good?
We Want “Work Conversations” to:
Reinforce Effort Build Relationships Focus on Progress
120
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 41
Feedback vs. Conversations
“It won’t work . . . I don’t have time . . . I don’t understand . . . This isn’t
that important to me . . .”
121
The Dilemma:
Inconsistent feedback quality from the leader
Purposes are not aligned between the two people
Many feel as though they are being “persuaded”
122
A Workable and Adaptive Conversation Framework
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 42
Try the BIFOCAL Conversation Framework:
Make it safeDiscover the information
Interpret and speculate
Decide what to do
Plan for implementation
+Collaborative Optimistic Experimental
Let’s watch two teachers for different things . . .
• Jacob Hunter, Geometry
• Elizabeth Miley, Language Arts
Richardson High School, Richardson, Texas
Questions to Guide the Conversation:
•Open-ended
•Inquisitive
•“Learning” rather than “telling”
•“50/50”
Purpose Question
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 43
Right Now:
1) Divide into pairs or trios.
2) Look back at our general conversational framework in your notes.
3) Look at the conversation question suggestions from Lufkin ISD. Can you chart some questions that would work for you? Are there some better questions to ask?
Why will we be confounded about the differentiation implementation issues that pop up and what do we do about it?
What is at the CORE of the Difficulty People Have with Change?
You know, schools don’t really change. We hope that the adults within the
schools do, though!What is the difficulty they have with the
changes they face?1) Is it that they don’t have confidence in
the work you are asking them to do?2) Is it simply about personalities?3) Is it about some kind of
communication issue?
129
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 44
Anticipating resistance . . .
As people experience changes . . .
They begin to “self-assess” their own capabilities and their social standing in terms of the change.
They seek connections among the changes to rationalize the work.
They may begin to behave in what appears to you to be irrational behavior . . . But actually you can predict that behavior if you take the time!
131
Make the connection . . .Where is resistance “most likely?” Why?
132
Initial Steps: InitiationDeeply Embedded: Institutionalization
Beginning Work: Implementation
Predict where you think resistance most likely will happen when thinking about the long-term commitment to something like differentiation. How
do a) work, b) communication, and c) personalities play into this?
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 45
133
Refocusing
Collaboration
Consequence
Management
Personal
Informational
Awareness
Usually “early on” in the work, before people are actually “doing” the change.
Management issues are related to time, schedules, materials, etc. Management issues are “good news, bad news”. It is only after management issues are resolved that the individual is more concerned about students than him/herself.
Understanding resistance better . . .
“The supreme happiness in life is the conviction that we are loved—loved for ourselves, or
rather, loved in spite of ourselves.”
--Victor Hugo
135
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 46
Can you hug a porcupine?
•What are porcupines really like?
•How are people like porcupines?
•Are there some basic understandings?» Learn the warning signs
» Don’t let your quills get the best of you
» Consider the person’s real needs and fears
What do we already know about the nature of
resistance?
Issue at school
Data to support it
Necessary change or improvement
Plans to initiate and implement the change
Completely logical, right?
Technical factors
Social factors
137
The Technical and Social Factors Collide:
Change
Technical Social
138
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 47
Mountview Middle School generally exhibits a spirit of collaboration, strong personal relationships, and investment in ideas and joint problem solving. Teachers are encouraged to be reflective about their work and to pursue personal goals. Yet over the past few years, the school has experienced a dramatic change in the demographics of their students and families. This has caused the principal to become concerned about how instructionally responsive the school is to its ever-changing population.
The principal and her leadership team explore possible solutions to the instructional issues, and choose differentiated instruction as their major change initiative. They put together a faculty meeting to share information, their research, and to launch the idea to the teachers. The principal carefully scripts her words to convey the “right” message.
The reaction of the teachers at that faculty meeting is not what was expected. Many complain about the “way” the meeting was conducted, objecting to the tone—more like a sales pitch than a sharing of information. Others feel insulted. Is this meeting an insinuation that they had been teaching “wrong” all these years?
139
1) Think about the technical and social factors.
2) Apply either/both to a real-life example you are experiencing.
3) Explain your “theory” to someone else at your table.
Can we actually be making it worse?
Holding a fixed mindset view of
resistance
Refusing to examine
resistance openly
Using our positions to try to force the change
Playing our own broken record
without listening
Being impatient without reason
Do any of these five somehow apply to you in certain situations?
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 48
Remember the Three Motivators?
142
143
• Guided support
• Independent practice
• Shared attempts and interactions
• Teaching and modeling
“I show you”
“We do together”
“You try with a
little help”
“You do on your
own”
-- Pearson and Gallagher, 1983, Wilhelm, 2001, Duke and Pearson, 2002
CONSULT
COACH
Because we feel an urgency, we
often move people TOO
QUICKLY from “learning about it” to “doing it
independently”.
TRAIN
So, you have to have the conversation . . .144
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 49
Checklist for your preparation:
1) Determine the location2) Think about timing3) Master body language4) Check for safety throughout5) Master your language:
– Suggestion– Recommendation– Expectation
The idea during the conversation is to reduce or eliminate inertia . . .
1) Think about “shifting” the person from a natural tendency to remain the same.
2) This can usually be accomplished by effective brainstorming, questioning, and a demand for goal setting.
The DANGER Zone:
147
Make it safeDiscover the information
Interpret and speculate
Decide what to do
Plan for implementation
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 50
Wording you say . . . What is that? Suggestion? Recommendation? Expectation?
Effective/Stronger?
Perhaps you might . . .
I would encourage you to . . .
A thought I have is . . .
Something you might want to . . .
“Even when you make the statement stronger, think about focusing on:
The work, not the person;A lack of power and position control; andA statement or question that requires a
commitment.”
148
A Reliable Conversation Strategy for Stubborn Resistance . . .
Follow “ABCD”:
1) Agree
2) Build
3) Compare
4) Determine
Take a moment to summarize your “drive aways” from our three days together. If you had to put your most important thought on a bumper sticker, what would it be?
150
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 51
Getting Started withDifferentiated Instruction
• Understand what you’re aiming for.• Make a plan (do something).• Bring the kids on-board so they can be your partners.• Develop effective routines.
PartSession
Understand what you’re aiming for.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 52
Differentiation is not a set of strategies, but
rather a way of thinking about teaching &
learning.
Three Pillars of Effective Differentiation
Philosophy Principles Practices
Regarding diversity as
normal & valuable
Teaching & learning
focused on a growthmindsetAccepting responsibility
for maximum progressfor each learner
Recognizing & removing
barriers to equity ofaccess to excellence formarginalized learners
Environment as a catalyst
for learning
Foundation of quality
curriculum
Assessment to inform
teaching & learning
Instruction in response to
student needs indicatedby formative assessment
Leading & managing a
flexible classroom
Proactive planning to
address readiness, interest,learning profile
Instructional approachesbased on student needs
& nature of content
Teaching Up
Respectful Tasks
Flexible Grouping
Toml inson 2013
Because kids differ, differentiation advocatesclassrooms that are:
• Respectful
• Responsive
• Flexible
• Planned
• Shared
• Reflective
Those concepts should guideour thinking & planning
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 53
Make a plan.
(Do something.)
•In one class
Where the need is greatest
Where you feel most comfortable
•For brief time spans
•Without group work
•With part of the class
•At the end of a time block
•With low prep strategies
Some Low Prep Options for Differentiation
Small group Instruction
Choices of books
Homework options
Homework checkers
Use of reading buddies
Varied journal Prompts
Orbitals
Varied pacing with anchor
options
Student-teaching goal setting
Work alone / together
Whole-to-part and part-to-whole
explorations
Flexible seating
Varied computer programs
Design-A-Day
Varied Supplementary materials
Options for varied modes of
expression
Varying organizers
Let’s Make a Deal projects
Computer mentors
Think-Pair-Share by readiness,
interest, learning profile
Use of collaboration,
independence, and cooperation
Open-ended activities
Mini-workshops
Jigsaw
Negotiated Criteria
Explorations by interests
Games to practice mastery of
information
Multiple levels of questions
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 54
…teachers should be the number one learners in the classroom…A critical process is that educators teach their students how to learn. If this is true, then teachers need tomodel the learning process to make it come alive for the students.
I’m particularly pleased that I have continued to work on my craft of teaching byimplementing practices that are grounded in research and theory.
Differentiation is a goal in our middle school. This year, my team worked to differentiateassessments so students can show their understanding and mastery of a particularskill in ways that best suit their needs.
Now I would like to hone my ability to assign differentiated, skills-based homework.
Patel, P. (2015). Perspectives. AMLE Magazine, 2(9) p. 6
Learning to Differentiate, One Step at a Time, Over Time
The Unspoken Effect of Grades
For some students, the certainty of praise
and success in school has become a
drug; they continually need more.
For many other students, year upon year of
“not good enough” has eroded their
intellectual self-confidence and resulted in
a kind of mind-numbing malaise.
Earl, L. (2003). Assessment as learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, p. 15.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 55
If the question is, “Do rewards
motivate students?”
the answer is,
“Absolutely! They motivate students
to get rewards.”
Zen And The Art of Public School Teaching by John Perricone • Publish America • p. 68
Principles of Effective Grading & Reporting
Principle #1
• It’s unwise to
over-grade
student work
Principles of Effective Grading & Reporting
Principle #2
Grades should be
based on clearly
specified learning
goals
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 56
Principles of Effective Grading & Reporting
Principle #3
Grades should be
criterion-based,
not norm-based
Principles of Effective Grading and
Reporting
Principle # 4
Data used for grading
must be valid (measure
what we intend to measure).
That is, the data must be free
of “Grade Fog.”
Common Sources of Bias and Distortion
Problems that can occur with the student
Lack of reading skill/language
Emotional upset
Poor health
Lack of testwiseness
Evaluation anxiety
Problems that can occur with the setting
Physical conditions – light, heat, noise, etc.
Problems that can occur with the assessment itself
Directions lacking or unclear
Poorly worded questions/prompts
Insufficient time
Misaligned with goals and/or instruction
Based on the ideas of Rick Stiggins
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 57
Grades are broken when zeros are used:
Zeros distort the actual achievement record
and can decrease student motivation to
learn.
There are, however, many fixes in the form of grading alternatives.
Schools/districts develop policies regarding these alternatives, then indicate to
their teachers which alternative(s) they can or should use in their classrooms.
A zero has an underserved and devastating influence so much so that
no matter what the student does, the grade distorts the final grade as
a true indicator of mastery. Mathematically and ethically this is
unacceptable. Wormeli, 2006, pp. 137-138
A Repair Kit for Grading by Ken O’Connor • Educational Testing Service, • p. 91-92
Zeros Cause Grade Fog
Whenever I hear statistics being quoted, I
am reminded of the statistician who drowned
while wading across a river with an average
depth of three feet.(McMann, 2003, np)
The mean can be very well named -- it is truly “mean” to students because it
overemphasizes outlier scores, which are most often low outliners. As we see
in the following case, the calculation of the mean can distort the final grade.
Ten assessments have been converted to percentage scores to calculate a final
grade:
91, 91, 91, 91. 91. 91. 91. 70. 91. 91
Total; = 889. Mean = 88/9. Final grade = B
This student performed at an A level, 9 times out of 10 and the 70 is clearly an
anomaly. But the grade as calculated in most schools would be a B.
A Repair Kit for Grading by Ken O’Connor • Educational Testing Service • p. 81-82
Assigning a Mean Can Cause Grade Fog
Principles of Effective Grading and
Reporting
Principle # 5
Grade later in the
learning cycle
rather than
earlier.
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 58
Some Possible Solutions
What About Report Cards?
Principles of Effective Grading and
Reporting
Principle # 6
When it’s time for
report cards,
practice 3-P
grading.
Achievement
on clearly
delineated
content goals
Habits of
mind and
work
Growth in
achievement
on clearly
delineated
content goals
Copyright 2016 Tomlinson & Murphy 59
1. Attach an explanatory checklist with the 3 Ps
2. Talk with parents during conferences about
the 3 Ps.
3. Send an e-mail with a completed template
reporting on the 3 Ps.
4. Have students keep records of their 3 Ps and
write a summary to parents.
5. Work to change the report card.
In any case, talk with your students consistently about the 3 Ps, their importance
in student development, and their interrelationships. Give 3P feedback.