Date post: | 24-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | april-jenkins |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Lean and Environment Lean and Environment A Forum for Local Agencies A Forum for Local Agencies
Pacific Northwest Pollution Prevention Resource Center
ROSS & ASSOCIATES ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, LTD.
AgendaAgenda 9:30am Welcome, Introductions
Why are you Hearing More about Lean, and Lean and Environment
10:00amWMS: Lean Manufacturing, and Integrating Lean and Environment
10:10am Tools, Resources, and Expanding Lean and Environment: Energy,
Climate Change, Service Industries
10:20am Northwest lean and environment project case study highlights
- Canyon Creek (Monroe)
- Lasco Bathware (Yelm)
- Columbia Paint & Coatings Company (Spokane)
- Woodfold (Forest Grove, Oregon)
10:50am Upcoming Lean Projects with Department of Ecology and
Washington Manufacturing Services (WMS)
11:00amOpen forum – How can agencies get involved?
11:30amAdjourn
3
Welcome / Set ContextWelcome / Set Context
Dave DellarcoDave DellarcoNational Center for National Center for Environmental Innovation, Environmental Innovation, U.S. Environmental U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyProtection Agency
4
Why Are You Hearing About Why Are You Hearing About Lean? Lean?
Lean production is becoming more & more widespread
Lean is connected to competitive business drivers with substantial financial benefits
Lean originated in automotive & aerospace sectors, but is rapidly being adopted by other mfg. sectors (appliances, construction, electronics, furniture, healthcare devices, metal fabrication, shipbuilding)◦ At least 30-40% of U.S. manufacturing firms are engaged in
lean; 5% are pursuing it aggressively◦ Many organizations in King County and the Pacific NW are
implementing LeanGrowing interest & experience with lean in service
sector (hospitals, banking, insurance) and government (15+ State and local environmental agencies)
5
Lessons from EPA Experience Lessons from EPA Experience (1 of 2)(1 of 2)
Tricky business to communicate the connection and the opportunity
Importance of going to “see” Lean and Environment in action–company site visits
This is different from TQM and is more than the flavor of the month
Value of coming through the “operations door” instead of the “EHS door”
6
Lessons from EPA Experience Lessons from EPA Experience (2 (2 of 2)of 2)Do not make a new program –
integrate, integrate, integrate!Do not try to make businesses’ do
Lean – piggyback on the “moving train”
Do not think you need to become Lean experts, focus on where and when to connect
Tap and leverage existing Lean networks and environmental networks
An Intro to Traditional An Intro to Traditional Lean –Lean –
Lean and Environment, Lean and Environment, and a Lean/Energy and a Lean/Energy
Efficiency Strategy being Efficiency Strategy being used in Californiaused in California
Rhea Wallace, Rhea Wallace, Washington Washington
Manufacturing ServicesManufacturing Servicesnote: switch to WMS ppt file – then back to this file.note: switch to WMS ppt file – then back to this file.
Example Value Stream Map
Market Forecast
CustomerA
2 people
C/T = 4 minC/O = 3 hrUptime=61%
Assembly &Inspection
2 people
Milling
C/T = 2 minC/O = 2 hrUptime=74%
3 people
C/T = 7 minC/O = 4 hrUptime= 48%
Painting
I I I3 people
Shipping
7 min4 min2 min
5 days 8 days5 days 5 days
Production ControlAnnual Production
Plan
Weekly delivery
schedule
Weekl
y s
chedule
Daily
sch
ed
ule
Daily sched
uleDaily schedule
WK
I
5 days
D ID
30 daysWK
Receiving
C/T = 2 minC/O = 30 minUptime=93%
Welding
5 days
2 min
CustomerBSupplier
1Supplier
2
28 days
15 min
Current /Actual Time
Value-Added Time
10
What is Lean & What is Lean & Environment?Environment?
Tim Larson, Tim Larson, Ross & AssociatesRoss & Associates
11
Lean & Environment Lean & Environment TopicsTopics
Lean & Environment Research◦ Observations◦ Lessons Learned
Lean & Environment Work Areas◦ Lean and Environment Integration◦ Addressing Regulatory Friction around Lean◦ Lean Government
For More Information…
12
Key Research Observation Key Research Observation #1#1Lean produces an operational and cultural environment highly conducive to waste reduction, pollution prevention, and sustainability.
◦ Manufacturing and office environment environmental waste reductions of 25-75%
◦ Environmental improvements come on coattails of Lean, but are not typically part of the business case
13
Lean Production’s Environmental Lean Production’s Environmental “Coattails”“Coattails”
◦ Less scrap, fewer defects, less spoilage = reduced waste
◦ Fewer defects, less overproduction, simpler products, right-sized equipment =
reduced use of raw materials ◦ Less storage, inventory space needed =
reduced materials, land, and energy consumed◦ Less overproduction, lighting/heating/cooling unneeded
space, oversized equipment = less energy use
◦ Less overprocessing, more efficient transport and movement =
lower emissions◦ Clean, orderly workplace w/ well-maintained equipment =
fewer accidents; leaks & spills are noticed quickly
14
Lean Manufacturing Cell Lean Manufacturing Cell ExampleExample
Supermarket
Deburr
Die Storage
Hot Form Press
Edge Chamfer
Sand Blast
Assemble
Part Mark
& Wrap
Tab Shear
INLINE PAINT
Inline Checks
15
Key Research Observation Key Research Observation #2#2Lean can be leveraged to produce even more environmental improvement, by addressing environmental “blind spots” in lean.
◦ Hidden environmental waste is often buried in overhead and facility support costs
◦ Environmental and human health risks from toxics are not typically considered in Lean
◦ Product lifecycle factors are not often considered in Lean (material sourcing and product disposal)
16
Production Processes:Too Long
Too ComplexToo Sloppy
Too Risky
Lean “Blind Spots”: Risk and Lifecycle Impacts
Product:Too Complex
Too Much Material
Too Risky Material
Too Risky Use
Extraction:Energy
Materials
Attraction:Knowledge
Capital
Energy Inefficiency
Non-Product Output
Disposition:Destruction
DisposalDispersal
ReuseRecycle
Key:
Low Lean ManufacturingAttentiveness
High Lean ManufacturingAttentiveness
Product:Too Complex
Too Much Material
-
17
Key Research Observation Key Research Observation #3#3Lean can result in some regulatory friction (uncertainty, delay) around environmentally-sensitive processes.
◦ Air permitting can constrain ability to make rapid changes during kaizen rapid improvement events
◦ Uncertainty about compliance strategies for cellular mfg. layout with flexible, right-sized equipment
◦ Shifting to chemical point-of-use systems can raise compliance questions & uncertainty under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)
18
Lessons LearnedLessons Learned
Significant environmental benefits come along for the ride on lean coattails
Culture & approaches used in lean & EMS are compatible, but differ
Lean offers valuable “market opportunities” for pollution prevention (P2) expertise and tools
Linking to operations-driven lean initiatives can help P2 “compete,” not just “pay”
Removing regulatory friction with lean through guidance/innovation can improve environmental performance
Lean can produce even more environmental improvement by addressing “blind spots” (risk, lifecycle impacts)
19
Lean Manufacturing and Lean Manufacturing and Environment Integration EffortsEnvironment Integration Efforts
EPA’s Lean and Environment Toolkit (2006) and Lean and Energy Toolkit (2007)
◦ Designed to show lean practitioners how to integrate environmental & energy considerations into lean
◦ Practical strategies and tools that work with and support lean’s overall waste-elimination focus
2020
Lean & Climate Change Lean & Climate Change Example ResultsExample Results
Many lean companies have already made the connection between lean and energy use
◦ Toyota North America: Reduced energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturing by 30% per vehicle produced since 2000
◦ GE: Reduced CO2 emissions by 250,000 metric tons and saved $70 million in energy costs at facilities worldwide since 2005
◦ Lasco Bathware: WA facility saved 12.6 million ft3 of natural gas and $99,000 per year in energy costs
21
Examples of Efforts to Address Examples of Efforts to Address Regulatory Barriers to LeanRegulatory Barriers to Lean
Clean Air Act Flexible Permitting Rulemaking
Baxter Health Care, Mountain Home, AR◦Pilot project to adapt air permitting
approaches to accommodate rapid change and right-sized, mobile equipment
Boeing 3P Event for Right-Sized, In-Line Painting
RCRA Hazardous Waste Accumulation Requirements
22
EPA and State Environmental EPA and State Environmental AgencyAgencyLean in Government EffortsLean in Government Efforts
“Working Smart for Environmental Protection” Primer◦ Describes state efforts to
improve agency processes with lean and six sigma
Lean in Government Starter Kit◦ How-to guide for getting
started with lean in government
23
Lean at Environmental Agencies Lean at Environmental Agencies Is Rapidly ExpandingIs Rapidly Expanding
State and local events complete/ongoing: Delaware, California, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, San Diego
EPA & States: Region 7 and Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska
Interested: Florida, Kentucky, Montana, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon
24
Lean & Environment Lean & Environment ResourcesResources
EPA's Lean & Environment website www.epa.gov/lean
Lean Manufacturing and Environment Report (2004 Shingo Prize winner) www.epa.gov/lean/leanreport.pdf
Lean and Environment Toolkit www.epa.gov/lean/toolkit
Lean and Energy Toolkit www.epa.gov/lean/toolkit/LeanEnergyToolkit.pdf
Working Smart for Environmental Protection (Lean in Government Primer) www.epa.gov/lean/primer.pdf
Lean in Government Starter Kit www.epa.gov/lean/starterkit/
Three Pilot Projects: ’06 – Three Pilot Projects: ’06 – ‘07‘07
Collective Annual Cost Savings in Productivity and Environmental Improvements:
$1.4 Million
“I believe the collective experience has set the groundwork for future lean and environmental improvement efforts at our company.”
Project ObjectivesProject ObjectivesDevelop a partnership between
Ecology and WMS ◦(State agency and state MEP)
Evaluate the benefits of integrating environmental tools into lean practices
Gain the expertise to offer future lean and environment projects to manufacturers statewide.
Canyon Creek Cabinet Canyon Creek Cabinet Company Company
Millwork (Millennia Line)◦Reduced bottlenecks in the milling area
with improved area and equipment layout
◦Reduced lead time by 24% ◦Reduced wasted wood
Coating operations◦Quick change-over of aqueous coatings◦Dedicated stations (solvent-based, NO
changeover)◦Alternative coating product◦ Improved Quality Control (QC) stations
Lean and Environment Lean and Environment ToolsToolsP2
environmental waste identification total cost analysis material substitution
Lean 5S standard work layout changes triggering set-up reduction
Analytic Tools Common to Both root cause, process mapping, Pareto, fishbone
Orphan Bin, Doors & Drawer Orphan Bin, Doors & Drawer FrontsFronts Before Before After After
CANYON CREEK
Aqueous PurgeAqueous Purge
Waste1.3 quarts
New
Old
Waste0.5 quarts
Recoverable Product1 quart
CANYON CREEK
Environmental ResultsEnvironmental ResultsReduce hazardous waste by 86,000 lbs/yr
◦ Solvents and stains
Reduce hazardous material use by 68,000 lbs/yr◦ Solvents and stains
Reduced VOCs by 55,000 pounds/yr◦ Allowing 70% additional growth before Title V
threshold
Reduced solid waste by 508,000 pounds/year◦ Wood
Reduced defects by 10,000 parts/year Reduced employee exposure
CANYON CREEK
Raw Materials Raw Materials $110K$110K
EnergyEnergy $ 24K$ 24K
Hazardous SubstancesHazardous Substances $ 129K$ 129K
Dangerous WasteDangerous Waste $ 37K$ 37K
Solid Waste (wood)Solid Waste (wood) $ 58K$ 58K
RejectsRejects $ 208K$ 208K
LaborLabor
*reassigned*reassigned*$ 624K*$ 624K
TotalTotal $1.18 Million$1.18 Million
Canyon Creek – Cost SavingsCanyon Creek – Cost Savings
Lasco BathwareLasco BathwareYelm, Washington Yelm, Washington
Manufactures fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP), and acrylic tubs and shower units.
Lasco: Plant-Wide “Processing” Lasco: Plant-Wide “Processing” WastesWastes
Plantwide Fallout Costs: $ per Year
$-
$200,000.00
$400,000.00
$600,000.00
$800,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$1,200,000.00
$1,400,000.00
Plantwide
SuperBlue
Acetone
Air Emissions (Styrene)
Solid Waste
Natural Gas Use
Electricity Use
Major AccomplishmentsMajor AccomplishmentsImproved flow of work and finished
inventory in shipping/packaging Improved fiberglass spray transfer
efficiency and reduced variabilityReduced solid waste and energy use
◦eliminated oven
◦calibration wasteImproved layout and mold change-
over time in acrylic vacuum-forming area
Lean and Environment Lean and Environment ToolsToolsP2
environmental waste identification total cost analysis
Lean 5S standard work layout set-up reduction six sigma line balancing design of experiment visual workplace
Spray Variability/EfficiencySpray Variability/Efficiency
Reduced variability from +13 lbs/unit to +4 lbs/unit (69%)
Reduced overspray and calibration waste
Stronger products (more resin on the product)
Mold PositioningMold Positioning
After: Jacks achieve proper height faster, more preciselyPins will position molds on table
Before: blocks/shims for height, slipping on platen
Raw MaterialRaw Material - 51,600 pounds resin and CaSO- 51,600 pounds resin and CaSO44
$22,000 $22,000
Solid Waste Solid Waste - calibration resin, overspray, tape/foil- calibration resin, overspray, tape/foil
$ 4,000$ 4,000
EnergyEnergy - 12,600 MCF natural gas- 12,600 MCF natural gas
$99,000$99,000
LaborLabor $34,000$34,000
TotalTotal $159,000$159,000
Lasco Bathware – Cost SavingsLasco Bathware – Cost Savings
Post-Project HappeningsPost-Project Happenings
Expanded pilot project changes to other Expanded pilot project changes to other areas/product linesareas/product lines
Reduced acetone use by 30-40 gallons Reduced acetone use by 30-40 gallons per weekper week
Lean teams - 5S work area scoring Lean teams - 5S work area scoring systemsystem
Lean culture – implementing employee Lean culture – implementing employee suggestions, hired a new manager with suggestions, hired a new manager with strong lean stancestrong lean stance
Columbia Paint: Before Kaizen (or Columbia Paint: Before Kaizen (or Get-R Done Event) #1 Get-R Done Event) #1
Batch formulation not tied to filling lines◦ tanks were filled when
empty, not based on need
Batch board was ineffective ◦ status verified by walking
through the plant
Wasted time and motion
Columbia Paint: After Get-R Columbia Paint: After Get-R Done #1Done #1
Batch formulation based on filling lines◦ Based on need (= pull)
Batch status easy to see by everyone!
WIP controlled, increased batch velocity
Can accommodate rush orders
Can now reuse
wastewater in batches
Total Waste WaterTotal Waste Water
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
Mean o
f Am
ount
05/0
3/2
006
05/1
9/2
006
06/0
8/2
006
06/2
6/2
006
07/1
2/2
006
07/2
8/2
006
08/1
4/2
006
08/3
1/2
006
09/1
5/2
006
10/0
4/2
006
10/1
8/2
006
11/0
2/2
006
Date
Avg=118.27
LCL=-17.79
UCL=254.32
Individual on Group Means of Amount
After Kaizen #1
Reducing Bad Batches and Reducing Bad Batches and Inventory Waste By Inventory Waste By Reorganizing IngredientsReorganizing Ingredients
BEFORE AFTER
Get-R-Done # 3: Get-R-Done # 3: Material and Inventory ManagementMaterial and Inventory Management
Simple kanban allows user to see amount of raw material remaining
Materials used together now stored together
More bulk purchasing
Reduced material handling, improved flow, optimized space, eliminated waste
Annual Cost SavingsAnnual Cost SavingsLaborLabor $ 90,000$ 90,000
Raw material Raw material - Paint solids 15,000 pounds/year- Paint solids 15,000 pounds/year
-- Shrink wrapShrink wrap
$ 17,000$ 17,000
$ 29,000$ 29,000
Wastewater Reuse Wastewater Reuse - 21,000 gal/year - 21,000 gal/year
Not Not quantifiedquantified
Hazardous WasteHazardous Waste - 2,820 pounds/year- 2,820 pounds/year
$ 2,820$ 2,820
TotalTotal $138,600$138,600
Major Major AccomplishmentsAccomplishmentsReduce and reuse ALL latex white
wash waterBetter batch scheduling reduced clean
out waste Inventory organization reduces bad
batches and wasteImproved work flow by eliminating
bottlenecks (especially QC steps)
Washington Pilot Project Washington Pilot Project FindingsFindingsSynergy: Lean and P2 are mutually beneficialLean Offers a New Angle for P2: Improve
P2 by appealing to production concernsCross-Training: Helpful to coach P2 folks to
identify lean pain, and lean folks to identify environmental pain
Different Sell: P2 “sellers” need to speak the language of business and productivity, and translate benefits into more obvious business and cost advantages
Facility Management Support/Participation
Woodfold Mfg.,Woodfold Mfg.,
Forest Grove, Oregon Forest Grove, Oregon
See case study at See case study at www.pprc.org/solutions/leangreen2.cfm
Pending Projects for the Pending Projects for the Ecology and WMS Ecology and WMS
PartnershipPartnership Michael Johnson, Department of Michael Johnson, Department of
Ecology Ecology Potential small demonstration to deliver joint Lean/Environment services
Lean Design Project
Note: Switch to Lean Design Presentation
Agency Staff Questions and Agency Staff Questions and InputInput Is your agency interested in any aspect of
lean/environment we have discussed today?
Is your agency doing any internal lean
work? If yes, have you included environmental considerations?
Are there businesses you work with that might be interested or ready for – lean and environment/energy? lean and government?
Do you see any opportunities for anyone in this team of Washington project partners to assist or work with you on lean/environment?