Date post: | 07-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | natasha-lucas |
View: | 372 times |
Download: | 0 times |
WebWeb 2.0 Final 2.0 Final Presentation.Presentation.
Well Wiki’d Team.Well Wiki’d Team.
What we asked?What we asked?
• Did you enjoy Learning 2.0 @ Salford Did you enjoy Learning 2.0 @ Salford
• Use three words to describe the programme Use three words to describe the programme
• How would you rate the programme? : 1-10: 1 being bad, 10 being good.How would you rate the programme? : 1-10: 1 being bad, 10 being good.
• Which of the technologies do you think you will use at work in the future? Which of the technologies do you think you will use at work in the future?
• What was the best bit?What was the best bit?
• What was the worse bit?What was the worse bit?
• Any comments? Any comments?
Did you enjoy Learning 2.0 ? @ Did you enjoy Learning 2.0 ? @ SalfordSalford
Use three words to describe the Use three words to describe the programme programme
How would you rate the How would you rate the programme?programme?
Which technologies would you Which technologies would you use at work?use at work?
What was the best bit?What was the best bit?
What was the worst bit?What was the worst bit?
What people thought…What people thought…
Was a good course - Was a good course - would recommend it. A would recommend it. A nice change from our nice change from our day-to-day jobs and I day-to-day jobs and I
learnt about some new learnt about some new technologies I didn't technologies I didn't
know about previously. know about previously. It was also good to It was also good to work with different work with different people and it was people and it was
useful to see how we useful to see how we some of these some of these
technologies could be technologies could be used in a work context used in a work context
in the future.in the future.
Course was worth doing, but too long and possibly a
bit self-indulgent. Mind you, using 2.0 technology
to talk about 2.0 technology is incredibly
post-modern!
Structure of course needs looking at, 12 weeks with approx
2+ hours per week is a lot of time to devote
to this.
Comments…Comments…
For the full spreadsheet of results visit this link: http://tinyurl.com/y7dbkvs
Credits/Tools…Credits/Tools…
Contributors:Contributors:o Caroline WoodCaroline Woodo Julia TaylorJulia Tayloro Natasha LucasNatasha Lucas
Tools:Tools:o Google Docs Google Docs ((http://docs.google.comhttp://docs.google.com ) )
o Wordle Wordle ((www.wordle.netwww.wordle.net ) )
o SlideShare SlideShare ((www.slideshare.netwww.slideshare.net ) )
o TinyURL TinyURL ((http://tinyurl.comhttp://tinyurl.com ) )o For ‘click through’ stat’s contact Natasha LucasFor ‘click through’ stat’s contact Natasha Lucas