Date post: | 14-Jun-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | ccafs-cgiar-program-climate-change-agriculture-and-food-security |
View: | 250 times |
Download: | 0 times |
The Sustainable Livestock Agenda
www.livestockdialogue.org
The livestock sector is resource-hungry
~ 70 of total agricultural land, 35 % of all crop land
~ 60 % of total anthropogenic biomass appropriation
~ 29 % of agricultural water useGreenhouse gas emissionsDriver of deforestation (pasture, soy)
and degradationMajor source of water pollution
Point of DepartureThe livestock sector is resource-hungry The sector has specific resource issues
◦Low NRU efficiency◦geographic dispersion (extensive systems)◦geographic clustering (intensive systems)
Demand will continue to grow and needs to be accommodated within finite resources
Potential for social, health and economic gains needs to be seized
A Global Agenda of Action
• Focus: Livestock sector’s natural resource use – social, economic and health aspects need to be safeguarded
• Nature: Open, voluntary, informal, consensual, action-oriented, multi-stakeholder (public, private, civil society, research, international organizations)
• Process: Broad stakeholder consultations to create awareness, agree on objectives, priorities and concepts (ongoing)
Direction of ChangeImproving the efficiency of natural resource useThree focus areas:
1. Close the efficiency gap: catching up in technology adoption
2. Restore value to grasslands: supporting soil carbon, ecosystem health and productivity restoration with climate finance
3. Zero discharge: towards full recovery of nutrient and energy from animal manure
Closing the Efficiency Gaptotal greenhouse gas emissions and milk output per cow
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000
Output per cow, kg FPCM per year
kg C
O2-
eq. p
er k
g FP
CM
Closing the efficiency gapResource constraints have started to
“bite”Huge gaps between attainable and
actually attained efficiencyGaps can be narrowed with existing
technologyGlobally there is more gain from large
numbers of producers catching up than from pushing the frontier
Prices need to reflect true scarcities of natural resources
Closing the natural resource use efficiency gap
Actions Govern-ments
PrivateSector
Civil Society Org.
Science
Inter Governmental Org.
Define and measure efficiency
Assess natural resource use efficiency gap and options to close the gap
Develop PPPs for innovation and technology transfer
Promote investments in efficiency improvement
What has changed: The natural resource constraint has become “real”
Expected result: More knowledge -intensive practices, with more efficient natural resource use
Restoring Value to Grasslands:Potential C sequestration in natural grasslands
Through grazing practices, 20 year horizon
Restore value to grasslandsGrasslands:
◦ often heavily degraded◦ home to the poorest people globally
Carbon finance and other PES can alter the production function of grasslands, particularly in marginal areas
Develop a “business case” for grasslands – multiple, global and local, environmental services
Certification methodologies are required Institutional mechanisms for benefit sharing need
to be developed Income and development in areas without
alternatives to livestock
Restoring value to grasslands
Actions Govern-ments
PrivateSector
Civil Society Org.
Science
Inter Governmental Org.
Assess potential for carbon sequestration and synergies with food security
Develop monitoring and certification methodologies
Pilot institutional and technical approaches
Develop intergovernmental support for grasslands, e.g. through NAMAs
What has changed: Payment for Environmental Services and climate change finance can reverse the neglect of grasslands and enhance productivity and incomes
Expected result: Pastoralist adopt practices that provide environmental services and improve food security
Estimated distribution of industrialized produced pig populations. Livestock’s Long Shadow, 2006
Globally-900,000,000 hogs
Towards zero discharge: Recovery of nutrients and energy from animal manure
Issue: Discharge of animal manure into the environment caused by geographic concentration of livestock total amounts of nutrients in livestock
excreta > synthetic fertilizers50 to 90 percent of nutrients contained in
feed are excreted as manure, 30 % of energyTechnology exists to recover most of the
energy (biogas) and nutrients (except N)Policies to address spatial distribution of
livestock are required
Recovery of nutrient and energy from animal manure
Actions Govern-ments
PrivateSector
Civil Society Org.
Science
Inter Governmental Org.
Analyze the clustering trend and assess the constraints to improved practices
Develop regional networks for policy advise
Create opportunities for nutrient recycling and energy recovery
Foster the development of PPPs for technology transfer and adoption
What has changed: Discharge of animal manure is less and less accepted
Expected result: Increased nutrient and energy recovery from manure, resulting in reduced pollution
The Agenda: what’s new?
The thematic focus◦ Puts the livestock sector on a sustainable growth
path◦ Offers strong synergies between economic gains
and environmental impact reduction
The action-orientation (change in practice)◦ Build on the sense of urgency to put what we know
into practice
Value added of the multi-stakeholder engagement◦ Convergence of interests and action will translate
into change of practices