Date post: | 13-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | benedict-anderson |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 1
In Chapter 9, we looked at how concepts are mentally represented and accessed.
• General forms are used• most likely to be useful in the future• detail stripped away• at the scale of the word or schema
Chapter 11 is about how we generate knowledge at a larger scale – for example, the scale of texts.
Introduction
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 2
The Challenge
To understand the challenge of acquiring a text, think about how we acquire concepts in childhood.
• through repetition and successive refinement
• e.g, doggie – first, all four-legged animals, then, small four-legged animals, then dogs.
• as children, we have years to accomplish this
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 3
Reading a text, we go through the same process in a much shorter time – perhaps minutes.
‘Reading a text’ may mean reading words written on a page or reading a situation.
• E.g., how have American leaders ‘read’ the situation in Afghanistan?
The Challenge
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 4
Three influences on text comprehension
The task is to read and remember a text-level message. What influences our ability to encode, store, and retrieve larger units of meaning?
• The reader’s knowledge
• The structure of the text
• The interaction of these two
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 5
1. The reader’s knowledge
2. The structure of the text
3. The interaction of these two
Three influences on text comprehension
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 6
The Reader’s Knowledge
Q. What kind of knowledge influences comprehension?
A. Schema knowledge
Q. What do schemas influence?
A. Schemas have effects at both encoding, and retrieval.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 7
Bransford & Johnson (1973)
• balloon serenade passage
No context group remembered 3.6 propsnsContext after group remembered 3.6 “Context before group remembered 8.0 “
Point: you can’t remember what you don’t comprehend.
Schema effects at encoding
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 8
Schema effects on retrieval
Dooling & Christianson (1973)
Read this passage:
Carol Harris was a problem child from birth. She was wild, stubborn, and violent. By the time Carol turned eight, she was still unmanageable. Her parents were very concerned about her mental health. There was no good institution in her state. Her parents finally decided to take some action. They hired a private teacher for Carol.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 9
Dooling & Christianson (1973)
Dooling & Christianson showed 2 groups of subjects that passage, and one week later, asked them to say whether the following sentence appeared in the passage:
“She was deaf, dumb, and blind.”
One group of subjects got no further information. One group was told, just before recall, that the story was really about Helen Keller.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 10
Dooling & Christianson’s results
Very few people in the control group said ‘Yes.’
Many people in the experimental group (told the story was about Helen Keller) said ‘Yes.’
For experimental group, retrieval process was influenced by their world knowledge, including knowledge of who Helen Keller was.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 11
Schema effects – conclusions
Bransford & Johnson:
• without schema, passage was difficult to understand and encode. Here, schema made memory performance more accurate.
Dooling & Christianson:
• passage easy to comprehend without schema. Schema produced a retrieval error.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 12
Schema effects – conclusions
Schemas can have either positive or negative effects at both encoding and retrieval.
If what you’re seeing or recalling is schema-consistent, the schema will help.
If what you’re seeing or recalling is schema-inconsistent, the schema will hinder.
Which is more likely?
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 13
1. The reader’s knowledge
2. The structure of the text
3. The interaction of these two
Three influences on text comprehension
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 14
The structure of the text
Comprehension and memory are affected by:
1. A story’s global structure.
2. A story’s local detail.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 15
Global structure vs. local detail
Consider Shakespeare’s Romeo & Juliet, and Bernstein’s West Side Story.
Global structure (very briefly):
• feuding social groups• young lovers from opposing sides• their love overwhelms reason• dire results
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 16
Global structure vs. local detail
Romeo & Juliet vs. West Side Story
Local detail:
R&J WSS
Capulets & Montagues Jets & Sharks (gangs)16th century Europe 20th century USAHorses, swords Cars, guns
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 17
Global structure vs. local detail
Both global structure and local detail influence comprehension.
• Changing global structure may impair comprehension – consider the movie Memento. You don’t have theme, or plot to work with.
• Aspects of local detail may also affect how easily a text is understood and how well it is remembered.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 18
Effects of Global Structure
Thorndyke (1975)
• Developed a grammar of story-telling.
• Story structure is hierarchical.
• Hierarchy can be thought of as a relation of containment, as in original network theory.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 19
Effects of Global Structure
Sentence NP + VP
Noun phrase (Det) + (Adj) + Noun
Verb phrase (Aux) + (Adv) + Verb
These relations can be represented in a network structure, as on the next slide. The network tells us about the structure of the sentence/text
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 20
Sentence
Noun Phrase Verb Phrase
Determiner Adjective Noun Verb Adverb
The good student read happily
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 21
Thorndyke’s grammar of storytelling
Thorndyke argued that stories have structure.
Stories consist of a setting, a theme, a plot, and a resolution.
Each of these components contains sub-components, just as a sentence contains phrases that in turn contain words.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 22
Thorndyke’s Grammar of Story-telling
Setting characters + location + time
Theme event + a goal
Plot episodes
Resolution subgoal + attempt + outcome
Manipulating story structure influences both comprehension and memory performance.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 23
Effects of Local Structure
The points to be made here are
• local structure is built out of propositions
• building that local structure involves two processes:
• referring a comment back to a topic within a proposition.• building bridges between propositions.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 24
Effects of Local Detail
When you read a passage, you interpret and store the passage as a structured set of propositions.
Proposition: the smallest unit of meaning that can have a truth-value (that is, can be true or false).
E.g. Dog – no sense in which this can be true or false.
The dog is blue – this can be true or false.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 25
Building structure out of propositions
Doing this involves two demanding processes:
1. Referring a comment back to a topic
The dog I saw that lady with the flowered hat walking yesterday was a spaniel.
The more propositions appear between topic and comment, the tougher comprehension is.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 26
2. Building bridges between two ideas.
John threw a cigarette out of his window while driving through the forest. The fire destroyed hundreds of acres.
The reader must add: The cigarette caused the fire.
This is an implicit proposition. Comprehension is easier if bridging propositions are explicit.
Building structure out of propositions
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 27
Building structure out of propositions - evidence
1. Haviland & Clark (1974)
a. Horace got some beer out of the trunk. The beer was warm.
b. Horace was especially fond of beer. The beer was warm.
Task: press button when you comprehend second sentence.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 28
Haviland & Clark
Result:
People took longer in condition b. than in condition a.
Conclusion:
Extra time was necessary to make the bridge – to work out that the beer in the second sentence was related to the beer in the first sentence.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 29
Building structure out of propositions - evidence
Kintsch (1974)
Gave subjects sentences like the one about John and the fire above. Tested their memory for the passages either immediately after reading or 20 minutes later.
Immediate: Memory better for explicit propositions.
Later: Memory equal for two kinds.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 30
Kintsch
Conclusion:
Successful integration of new information into the developing text structure means that surface form of text (the actual words) can be discarded.
What is retained in memory is the propositional structure. In that representation, implicit and explicit propositions are equal.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 31
1. The reader’s knowledge
2. The structure of the text
3. The interaction of these two
Three influences on text comprehension
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 32
Integrating the reader’s knowledge and the text
The dominant figure in this area is Walter Kintsch.
Van Dijk & Kintsch (1978) argued for three different levels of representation of texts:
• Surface code• Textbase• Situation model
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 33
Van Dijk & Kintsch’s model
• The surface code represents a text using the actual words in the text.
• A textbase represents a text in the form of propositions (explicit and implicit).
• A situation model is a mental model that integrates the text information with pre-existing world-knowledge (also in proposition form).
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 34
SurfaceCode
The text
SituationModel
Knowledge about the world
Textbase
Knowledge about the text
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 35
Van Dijk & Kintsch’s model
As propositions are extracted from the text:
• they are organized around the structure the reader expects (setting, conflict, etc.)
• missing parts can be filled in from semantic memory
• parts not relevant to reader’s goals can be deleted.
Lecture 12 – Comprehension 36
Van Dijk & Kintsch’s model
Review:
Comprehension is an active process.
Propositions are extracted from surface code (explicit) or inferred (implicit), then organized.
Propositions are organized around expected text structure, and in concert with reader’s goals.