+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Lecture 22 Poynting’s Theorem and Normal Incidence

Lecture 22 Poynting’s Theorem and Normal Incidence

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: valdesctol
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 29

Transcript
  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    1/29

    EECS 117

    Lecture 22: Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    Prof. Niknejad

    University of California, Berkeley

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 1/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    2/29

    EM Power Carried by Plane Wave

    In a lossless medium, we have found that

    Ex = E0 cos(t z)

    Hy =E00

    cos(t z)

    where = and = /The Poynting vector S is easily calculated

    S = EH = zE2

    00

    cos2(t z)

    S = z

    E2020 (1 + cos (2(t z)))

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 2/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    3/29

    Average Power of Plane Wave

    If we average the Poynting vector over time, themagnitude is

    Sav =

    E2020

    This simple equation is very useful for estimating theelectric field strength of a EM wave far from its source

    (where it can be approximated as a plane wave)

    The energy stored in the electric and magnetic fieldsare

    we = 12|Ex|2 = 1

    2E20 cos

    2(t z)

    wm =

    1

    2|Hy|2

    =

    1

    2

    E20

    20 cos

    2

    (t z)Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 3/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    4/29

    Plane Wave Resonance

    Its now clear that

    wm =1

    2

    E20

    cos2(t

    z) = we

    In other words, the stored magnetic energy is equal tothe stored electric energy. In analogy with a LC circuit,

    we say that the wave is in resonance

    We can also show that

    tV

    (wm + we)dV = SS dS

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 4/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    5/29

    Example: Cell Phone Basestation

    A cell phone base station transmits 10kW of power.Estimate the average electric field at a distance of 1mfrom the antenna.

    Assuming that the medium around the antenna islossless, the energy transmitted by the source at anygiven location from the source must be given by

    Pt =

    Surf

    S dS

    where Surf is a surface covering the source of radiation.Since we do not know the antenna radiation pattern,lets assume an isotropic source (equal radiation in all

    directions)

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 5/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    6/29

    Example Cont.

    In that case, the average Poynting vector at a distance rfrom the source is given by

    S= Pt4r2

    = 104

    4Wm2

    This equation is simply derived by observing that the

    surface area of a sphere of radius r is given by 4r2

    Using S= 12E200

    , we have

    E0 =

    20S=

    2 377 10

    4

    4= 775

    V

    m

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 6/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    7/29

    Example: Cell Phone Handset

    A cell phone handset transmits 1W of power. What isthe average electric field at a distance of 10cm from thehandset?

    S=Pt

    4r2=

    1

    4.12W

    m2= 77

    W

    m2

    We can see that the electric field near a handset is at amuch lower level.

    Whats a safe level?

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 7/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    8/29

    Complex Poynting Theorem

    Last lecture we derived the Poynting Theorem forgeneral electric/magnetic fields. In this lecture wed liketo derive the Poynting Theorem for time-harmonic fields.

    We cant simply take our results from last lecture and

    simply transform t j. This is because the Poyntingvector is a non-linear function of the fields.

    Lets start from the beginning

    E = jB

    H = jD + J = (j + )E

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 8/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    9/29

    Complex Poynting Theorem (II)

    Using our knowledge of circuit theory, P = V I, wecompute the following quantity

    (EH

    ) = H

    EE H

    (EH) = H (jB)E (jD + J)

    Applying the Divergence TheoremV

    (EH)dV =S

    (EH) dSS

    (EH) dS = V

    E JdV+V

    j(E DH B)dV

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 9/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    10/29

    Complex Poynting Theorem (III)

    Lets define eff = + , and = . Since most

    materials are non-magnetic, we can ignore magneticlossesS

    (EH)dS = V

    EDdVjV

    (H H E E) d

    Notice that the first volume integral is a real numberwhereas the second volume integral is imaginary

    SEH dS = 2 V PcdV

    SEH

    dS = 4 V(wm we)dV

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 10/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    11/29

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    12/29

    Average Complex Poynting Vector

    Finally, we have computed the complex Poynting vectorwith the time dependence

    S = 12EH + EHe2jt

    Taking the average value, the complex exponential

    vanishes, so that

    Sav =1

    2 (EH)

    We have thus justified that the quantity S = EHrepresents the complex power stored in the field.

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 12/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    13/29

    Example: Submarine Communication

    Consider a submarine at a depth of z = 100 m. Wewould like to communicate with this submarine using aVLF f = 3 kHz. The conductivity of sea water is

    = 4 Sm1

    , r = 81, and 1.

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 13/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    14/29

    Ocean Water Conductivity

    Note that we are forced to use low frequencies due tothe conductivity of the ocean water. The lossconductive tangent

    tan c =

    105 1

    Thus the ocean is a good conductor even at 3 kHzThe propagation loss and constant are thus equal

    = = 2 0.2

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 14/

    O W W P i

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    15/29

    Ocean Water Wave Propagation

    The wavelength in seawater is much smaller than in air(0 = 100 km in air)

    = 2 = 29 m

    Thus the phase velocity of the wave is also much

    smallervp = f 9 104 m/s

    The skin-depth, or the depth at which the wave is

    attenuated to about 37 % of its value, is given by

    =1

    = 4.6 m

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 15/

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    16/29

    Ocean Water Fields

    The wave impedance is complex with a phase of 45

    |c|

    =

    8

    102

    c = ej45

    Notice that c 0, the ocean water thus generates avery large magnetic field for wave propagation

    H =

    E0

    c ez

    cos(6 103

    t z )Where is the angle of the complex wave impedance,

    45

    in this particular case

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 16/

    Shi t S b i C i ti

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    17/29

    Ship to Submarine Communication

    Now lets compute the required transmission power ifthe receiver at the depth of z = 100 m is capable ofreceiving a signal of at least 1 V/m

    Side-note: the receiver sensitivity is set by the noisepower at the input of the receiver. If the signal is toosmall, its swamped by the noise.

    E0ez Emin = 1 V/m

    This requires E0 = 2.8 kV/m, and a corresponding

    magnetic field of H0 = E0/c = 37 kA/m

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 17/

    P ti V t i O W t

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    18/29

    Poynting Vector in Ocean Water

    This is a very large amount of power to generate at thesource. The power density at the source is

    Sav = 12(EH)

    Sav =1

    2(2.84

    37 cos(45)) = 37 MW/m2

    At a depth of 100 m, the power density drops toextremely small levels

    Sav(100m) = 4.6 1012 MW/m2

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 18/

    R fl ti f P f t C d t

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    19/29

    Reflections from a Perfect Conductor

    Consider a plane wave incidentnormally onto a conducting surface

    Ei = xEi0ej1z

    Hi = yEi00

    ej1z

    The reflected wave (if any) has thefollowing form

    Er = xEr0ej1z

    Hr = yEr00

    ej1z

    Ei

    Hi

    Er

    Hr

    Si

    Sr

    =

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 19/

    B d C diti t I t f

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    20/29

    Boundary Conditions at Interface

    The conductor forces the tangential electric field tovanish at the surface z = 0

    E(z = 0) = 0 = x(Ei0 + Er0)

    This implies that the reflected wave has equal andopposite magnitude and phase

    Er0 = Ei0This is similar to wave reflection from a transmission

    line short-circuit load.

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 20/

    T t l Fi ld

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    21/29

    Total Field

    We can now write the total electric and magnetic field inregion 1

    E(z) = xEi0(ej1z

    ej1z

    ) = xEi0j2sin(1z)

    H(z) = yEi00

    (ej1z + ej1z) = yEi00

    2cos(1z)

    The net complex power carried by the wave

    EH

    = zE2i0

    0 4j sin(1z) cos(1z)

    is reactive. That means that the average power is zero

    Sav = 12(EH) = 0

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 21/

    Standing Wave

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    22/29

    Standing Wave

    The reflected wave interferes with the incident wave tocreate a standing wave

    E(z, t) = (E(z)ejt

    ) = (Ei0j2sin(1z)ejt

    )

    E(z, t) = 2Ei0 sin(1z)cos(t)

    H(z, t) = 2Ei01cos(1z) sin(t)

    Note that the E and H fields are in time quadrature (90

    phase difference)The instantaneous power is given by

    S=4E2

    i01 sin(1z)cos(1z)

    2 sin(21z)

    cos(t)sin(t) 2 sin(2t)

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 22/

    Standing Wave Power

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    23/29

    Standing Wave Power

    The electric and magnetic powers are readily calculated

    we =1

    2

    1

    |E1

    |2 = 21

    |Ei0

    |2 sin2(1z)cos

    2(t)

    wm =1

    21|H1|2 = 21|Ei0|2 cos2(1z)sin2(t)

    Note that the magnetic field at the boundary of theconductor is supported (or equivalently induces) asurface current

    Js = nH = x2Ei01

    A/m

    If the material is a good conductor, but lossy, then thiscauses power loss at the conductor surface.

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 23/

    Normal Incidence on a Dielectric

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    24/29

    Normal Incidence on a Dielectric

    Ei

    Hi

    Er

    Hr

    Si

    Sr

    Ht

    S

    Et

    t

    Consider an incident wave onto a dielectric region.

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 24/

    Normal Incidence on a Dielectric

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    25/29

    Normal Incidence on a Dielectric

    We have the incident and possibly reflected waves

    Ei = xEi0ej1z

    Hi = yEi01

    ej1z

    Er = xEr0ej1z

    Hr = yEr01

    ej1z

    But we must also allow the possibility of a transmittedwave into region 2

    Et

    = xEt0ej2z

    Ht = yEt02

    ej2z

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 25/

    Dielectric Boundary Conditions

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    26/29

    Dielectric Boundary Conditions

    At the interface of the two dielectrics, assuming nointerface charge, we have

    Et1 = Et2

    Ei0 + Er0 = Et0

    Ht1 = Ht2

    Ei0

    1 Er0

    1=

    Et0

    2We have met these equations before. The solution is

    Er0 =

    2

    12 + 1Ei0

    Et0 =22

    2 + 1

    Ei0

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 26/

    Transmission Line Analogy

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    27/29

    Transmission Line Analogy

    z = 0

    1 21 2

    These equations are identical to the case of theinterface of two transmission lines

    The reflection and transmission coefficients are thusidentical

    =Er0

    Ei0=

    2 12 + 1

    =Et0Ei0

    = 1 +

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 27/

    Harder Example

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    28/29

    Harder Example

    Consider three dielectricmaterials. Instead of solvingthe problem the longway,

    lets use the transmission lineanalogy.

    First solve the problem at the

    interface of region 2 and 3.Region 3 acts like a load toregion 2. Now transform thisload impedance by the length

    of region 2 to present anequivalent load to region 1.

    1

    1

    2

    2

    3

    3

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 28/

    Glass Coating

  • 8/2/2019 Lecture 22 Poyntings Theorem and Normal Incidence

    29/29

    Glass Coating

    A very practical example is the case of minimizingreflections for eyeglasses. Due to the impedancemismatch, light normally reflects at the interface of air

    and glass. One method to reduce this reflection is tocoat the glass with a material to eliminate thereflections.

    From our transmission line analogy, we know that thiscoating is acting like a quarter wave transmission linewith

    =

    0 glass

    Universit of California Berkele EECS 117 Lecture 22 . 29/


Recommended