Lecture 3:
Regulation through feedback inhibition by product
Analyzing role and function of sequence elements (sequence specific assays)
Origins and Replication Initiation
5’
5’
3’
3’
5’
3’5’
5’
Lecture 4: Eukaryotic Initiation and Regulation
In vivo analysis of protein interactions and complex assembly
Increasing the power of genetic tools with better molecular phenotypes
Develop in vitro system
Establish “purified” system
Create partial reactions and structurally analyze intermediates
Infer protein function and develop specific assays
Genetically identify initiation factors
A Tale of Two Systems
Localize factors to origins and/or replication forks
Develop in vitro system and specific assays
Establish order of assembly during initiation and cell cycle progression
Future mechanistic studies (great Bioreg proposals)
E. Coli oriC S. cerevisiae ARS
Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Replication Initiation Activities
1. Recognize initiation site (replication origin)
2. Expose single-stranded templates (unwind)
3. Load helicase at nascent fork
4. Prime DNA synthesis
5. Load polymerase(s)
5’
5’
3’
3’
5’
3’5’
5’
3’
3’
DnaA binds oriC ORC binds origins
DnaA
DnaC loads DnaB Cdc6, Cdt1 load Mcm2-7
Primase DNA Pol - primase
E. coli S. cerevisiae
ORC? Mcm2-7?
Converting DS DNA to replication fork
DnaB binds subunitSSB & primer-template
bind Clamp-Loader & Clamp
Sld2, Sld3, Dpb11 loadCdc45 & GINS
Sld2, Sld3, Dpb11 loadsDNA Pol complex
?? loadsDNA Pol complex
2-Stage Model for Protein Assembly During Replication Initiation
Pre-RC Pre-ICPost-RC
Initiation
CDKCdc7-Dbf4
License Trigger
GINS
M Phase G1 Phase S Phase
Genetic Screens Enriching for Replication Initiation Mutants
Conditional Mutants:cell division cycle (cdc)
budded morphology1N DNA content
execution point before elongation
Initiation or Elongation?: Execution Point Analysis
2nd shift ts
A mutated initiation function is completed by the time elongation is blocked
Elongation
1st shift HU
Elongation
A mutated elongation function is still needed when elongation blocked
1st shift HU
Requires independent and reversible means of inactivating two functions plus an “endpoint” assay
2nd shift ts
HU = hydroxyurea which blocks replication elongation by inhibiting dNTPs biosynthesis
Initiation
Initiation
Cell CycleCompleted
Cell CycleRemains Blocked
Genetic Screens Enriching for Replication Initiation Mutants
Conditional Mutants:cell division cycle (cdc)
budded morphology1N DNA content
execution point before elongation
cdc6cdc46/mcm5cdc47/mcm7cdc54/mcm4
cdc7dbf4cdc45
Genetic Screens Enriching for Replication Initiation Mutants
Conditional Mutants:cell division cycle (cdc)
Hypomorphic Mutants:minichromosome maintenance (mcm)
budded morphology1N DNA content
faster loss of minichromosome (I.e. selectable plasmid) from population
suppression of mcm phenotype with multiple plasmid origins
cdc6mcm2mcm3mcm5/cdc46
execution point before elongation
% cells containing plasmidWITH selection
% cells containing plasmidwithOUT selection
cdc6cdc46/mcm5cdc47/mcm7cdc54/mcm4
cdc7dbf4cdc45
mcm10
genetic & physical interactions with replication genes/proteins
POL2
DPB2DPB11
high copysuppression
PSF1coIP & mass spec PSF2
PSF3GINS complex
Gathering More Suspects: Guilt by Association
SLD4 = CDC45
SLD2
SLD3
SLD5
syntheticlethality
SLD1 = DPB3
DNA Pol subunits
Example: How Araki found many of the genes required for triggering initiation
CMG helicase holoenzyme subunits
Loaders for Pol Cdc45 & GINS
S. cerevisiae origin: ~120 bp ARS1
A B1 B2 B3
A is an essential ARS consensus sequence (ACS)
B1, B2, & B3 partially redundant (linker scan)
Yeast Origin Recognition Complex (yORC): A 6 Subunit Initiator
Biochem: Binding ActivityARS1 Footprint
Note: most other eukaryotic ORCs do NOT have such sequence specificity
Genetics: Establishing Initiation Function2-D gel analysis of ARS1 initiation
ORC5 orc5-1
Genetics: Hint from Mutational Correlation
ARS mutations
Poor in vitro binding activity
Poor in vivo origin function
In Vivo Assays for Protein DNA InteractionsIdentifying intermediates in the assembly of initiation complexes on DNA
Chromatin IP (ChIP)Preferred binding sites
of specific proteins
Genomic FootprintProtein binding and/or
distortion of specific sites
AR
S1
DN
A
DN
A:y
OR
C
Gen
om
ic F
oo
tpri
nt
yORC1ChIP preIP
ARS305
control
control
control
Gel
yORC1 ChIP-chip (chromosome VI)
Microarray
Pre-Replicative Complex (pre-RC) in G1 Phase Temporal analysis of genomic footprint at origins
M G1 S-G2-M
ORC hypersensitive sitereduced in G1 phase
Extended protectionof B domainIn G1 phase
Yea
st 2
µ o
rigin
Speculation: ORC binds origin throughout the cell cycle and is joined by other proteins in G1
phase to “license” origins for initiation
Ordered Assembly of Proteins at Origins During G1 & S Using ChIP to establish temporal order and genetic dependencies of proteins assembling at the origin
ARS1
control
control
control
G1 S - G2 -MG1 S - G2 -M
- Cdc6 + Cdc6
preIP
Example: G1-specific recruitment of Mcm7 is dependent on Cdc6
time points sampled for Mcm7 ChIP
G1MG2SG1Synchronizedyeast culture
- Cdc6 or + Cdc6
Using both Biochemistry and Genetics to understand function
Dynamic Protein Associations Through G1 and S Combining temporal and spatial analysis of replication and binding in synchronized cells
Some replication proteins that load at origins later move with the forks:Mcm2-7, Cdc45, GINS, Mcm10, Dpb11, DNA Pol , DNA Pol , DNA Pol , PCNA
(clamp), RFC1-5 (clamp loaders), RFA
BrdU incorporation monitors fork movement Cdc45 ChIP-chip tracks with fork movement
2-Stage Model for Protein Assembly During Replication Initiation
Pre-RC Pre-ICPost-RC
Initiation
License Trigger
GINS
M Phase G1 Phase S PhaseCDKCdc7-Dbf4
Biochemical insights into Mcm loading and activation
Pre-RC Assembly (helicase loading)
Can substitute mutant/modified proteins with altered activities
Can control addition order of protein, cofactors, or inhibitors
Can analyze structures with greater resolution and accuracy
ORC-DNA
Cdc6
Cdt1-Mcm2-7
ATP
Mcm2-7 doublehexamer remains on DNA after high salt wash
N
EM reconstruction
side end
C N C
hexamer hexamer
Helicase Activity
Drosophila extract
purifyhelicaseactivity
Cdc45 - Mcm2-7 - GINS(CMG - helicase “holoenzyme”)
Replication Elongation Blocking
Discussion Paper
2-Stage Model for Protein Assembly During Replication Initiation
Pre-RC Pre-ICPost-RC
Initiation
License Trigger
GINS
M Phase G1 Phase S PhaseCDKCdc7-Dbf4
core helicase loaded around
DS DNA
helicase holoenzymeloaded around
unwound SS DNA
A Simplified View of Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDKs)
CDK regulation
Molecular Biology of the Cell, 4th Ed.
different cyclins activate CDKs to promotedifferent cell cycle events
CDKs = kinase + cyclin
cyclins undergo periodic synthesis and proteolysis
CDK in S. cerevisiae
kinase = Cdc28
G1 cyclins = Cln1-3
G1 cyclinsnot shown
S & M cyclins = Clb1-6
Activation of CDKs and DDKs in S phase trigger origin initiation
Clb-Cdc28(CDK)
Dbf4-Cdc7(DDK)
Pre-RCPost-RC Pre-IC
Initiation
G2S
Identifying CDK and DDK targets for replication initiation
How to identify in vivo targets of kinase?
1) Kinase substrate in vivo
2) (Necessity) Phosphorylated sites essential for kinase function
phosphorylated in vivo in kinase dependent manner
in vitro and in vivo phosphorylation sites overlap
kinase substrate in vitro
3) (Sufficiency??) Phosphomimic mutations allow bypass of kinase requirement
Sld2 and Sld3 are essential replication targets for CDK triggering of initiation
Sld2 and Sld3 phosphorylation promotes their independent binding to Dpb11
Sld2 phosphorylation promotes formation of “pre-Loading Complex” with GINS, pol , Dpb11
Mcm4 and Mcm6 are essential targets for Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase (DDK)
DDK
A temporal program regulates DNA replication within S phaseLocate earliest DNA synthesis
One example: Microarray analysis of copy number
Earlier Initiation
Later Initiation
Temporal control of DNA replication through earlier DDK action?
CDKDDK
Pre-RC (DDK activated)
Post-RC
Initiation
G2S
Post-RC
Pre-RC
DDK CDK
Pre-RC Initiation
EarlyOrigins
LateOrigins
What distinguishes earlier from later origins?
What determines when a later origin becomes ready to fire?
Why is there temporal control of DNA replication within S phase?
Cdc45Sld3
Cell cycle control of origin function must be highly efficient
X X XX X X
if you want a 50,000 origin genome to NOT re-initiate with 99.5% fidelity
then re-initiation at each origin must be prevented with 99.99999% fidelity
(.9999999)50,000
= .995
CDK
MCM2-7
Cdt1ORC
Cdc6
ORC
ORC
Fork Fork
ORC
ORC
ORC
assemblepre-RC
triggerinitiation
G2 M G1 S G2 M G1Start
preRC assembly
NOtriggering initiation
NO preRC assembly
trigger initiation
CDK
MCM2-7Cdc6ORC Cdt1
Sld2 Sld3
The CDK paradigm for once and only once replication
G2 M G1 S G2 M G1Start
preRC assembly
NOtriggering initiation
Some preRC re-assembly
trigger initiation
CDK
MCM2-7
ORCCdc6 Cdt1
ORC
ORC
Fork Fork
ORC
ORC
assemblepre-RC
triggerinitiation
ORC
ORC
Fork Fork
MCM2-7
ORCCdc6 Cdt1
MCM2-7Cdc6ORC Cdt1
X X X X
Sld2 Sld3
The CDK paradigm for once and only once replication
CDKs Target Multiple Proteins to Block pre-RC Re-assembly
In budding yeast, CDK phosphorylation of
1) Mcm3 promotes Mcm2-7 nuclear exclusion
2) Cdc6 promote its proteolysis
4) Orc2/Orc6 inhibits recruitment of Cdt1-Mcm2-7
Overlapping mechanisms ensure re-initiation is blocked at thousands of origins
3) Cdc6 promotes CDK binding and inhibition
5) CDK binding to Orc6 inhibits ORC function
The extensive overlap of mechanisms is conserved, NOT specific mechanisms
Metazoans have additional CDK-independent mechanisms inhibiting re-initiation
Cell cycle control of origin function must be highly efficient
X X XX X X
if you want a 50,000 origin genome to NOT re-initiate with 99.5% fidelity
then re-initiation at each origin must be prevented with 99.99999% fidelity
(.9999999)50,000
= .995
CDK
Gene Amplification
Partial loss of replication control in yeast can greatly induce genomic instability How important is it to prevent re-initiation?
Aneuploidy Other Instability?
Translocations?
Inversions?
Loss of Heterozgosity?
QuickTime™ and a decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Segurado & Tercero, Biol. Cell (2009) 11:617-627
DNA lesions induce responses to: (1) protect stalled forks (2) bypass lesions (3) delay further initiation (4) block cell cycle
Beyond Initiation: Keeping the Fork Going Through Thick and ThinMany genomic insults are now thought to originate from replication accidents
1
2
3
4
Expanding influence of replication on other processes
Epigenetic Chromatin States-- how are chromatin states inherited during DNA replication?-- does replication timing contribute to this inheritance?
Sister Chromatid Cohesion
-- how is the establishment of cohesion coupled to DNA replication?
Development and Differentiation
-- do replication timing changes help execute developmental decisions?
Meiotic Recombination
-- how is initiation of DS breaks coupled to DNA replication?
Cancer Biology
-- does loss of replication control contribute to oncogenic genomic instability?
Evolution-- does sporadic re-replication contribute to genetic variation?
The Replication Checkpoint Insures Mitosis Does Not ProceedIf Replication Is Delayed or Blocked
Start
mitosis
Replication
elongation
initi
atio
n
Segregation
termination
Mec1
Rad53
Passage through Start independently sets into motion both Replication and Segregation
mec1
rad53
Branched view of cell cycleStandard view of cell cycle
Replication is normally completed before mitosis can begin, allowing their proper temporal order
Block or delay in elongation signals checkpoint mechanism (e.g. Mec1, Rad53) to prevent mitosis
Exact nature of signal is unknown but it cannot be generated unless some initiation occurs(abnormal fork structure? stalled replisome?)
Checkpoint Mechanisms Also Stabilize Stalled Replication ForksAbnormal replication intermediates accumulate when replication is delayed in checkpoint mutants
WT
CheckpointMutant(rad 53)
Unperturbed Replication dNTP Depleted Replication
hemi-replicated large gaps collapsed forks
Possible functions of checkpoint mechanisms at forks during replicative “stress”
maintain proper coordination of leading and lagging strand synthesisprevent fork collapse and branch migration
Based on EM analysis by Sogo & Foiani Labs, Science (2002) 297:599
These protective functions allow forks to resume replicating when the stress is removed
Origin Usage is Regulated During Development
Developing Frog S Phase Length
20-25 min
~ 6-8 hrs
~ 10 kb interorigin distance
~ 100 -200 kb interorigin distance
~ 20 kb interorigin distance
Line represents DS DNA
Origin Timing is Influenced by Chromatin Structure
ARS501late
ARS1early
Chr 5
Chr 4
ARS501
lateARS1
early
Chr 5
Chr 4
Position effect on origin timing
Swap positions
Telomeric heterochromatin can delay origin firing
from Brewer and Fangman labs, Cell (1992) 68:333
S. cerevisiae origins fire throughout S phase in a defined and reproducible order
TEL
Sir dependent heterochromatin
Y’ ARS fires late
TEL
Y’ ARS fires early
WT
sir mutant
from Gottschling Lab, Gene & Dev (1999) 13:146
Replication is Coupled to Establishment of Sister Chromatid Cohesion
Cohesin complexes (Scc1,Scc3,Smc1,Smc3) hold sisters together and ensure bipolar spindle attachment
Replication-like proteins have been implicated in the establishment of cohesion:
Cohesins must be present on chromatin during replication for proper cohesion to occur
Speculative polymerase switch model
- two DNA polymerases of the family,Trf4 and Trf5
- a modified RFC clamp loader with Ctf8,Ctf18, and Dcc1 substituting for Rfc1
figure from Hieter Lab, Mol Cell (2001) 7:959
Duplication of Nucleosome Structure During Eukaryotic Replication
Parental nucleosomes distribute randomly to daughter DNA
New histones complete the daughter complement of nucleosomes
Histone Deposition Factors (CAF-1 and/or Asf1)are recruited tonewly replicated DNA by PCNA and deposit H3H4 tetramers
How higher order chromatin structure is duplicated is not known
H2A-H2B dimers self assemble onto H3-H4 tetramers
Model for new histone deposition at replication forks
caf-1 asf1 double deletion mutants are viable in yeast,suggesting other histone deposition mechanisms exist
Does the replicator model apply to metazoan origin?
The ARS plasmid assay has failed to identify metazoan origins
Alternative strategy:
100 kb
AGE
example: potential origin in human globin gene cluster
LCR
LCR = Locus Control Region (required for transcriptional activity of entire cluster)
IR
IR = Initiation Region based on physical mapping of nascent strands
Deletions in either region(from thallasemia patients) inactivates the IR
physically map sites of initiationgenetically identify sequences required for initiation at those sites
Alternative hypothesis:
little sequence specificity for initiation sitezones of initiation established by chromatin structure
Eukaryotic Replication Initiation is Coupled to the Cell Cycle
Two fundamental stages of initiation defined primarily by Chromatin IP and Chromatin Association assays
pre-Replicative Complex(pre-RC)
Replicative Complex(RC)
1 2
Stage 1: pre-RC assembly in G1 phase makes origins competent to initiate DNA replication
Stage 2: Passage through Start (G1 commitment point) activates Clb-Cdc28 kinase and Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase which trigger formation of the replicative complex and initiation of DNA replication
Initiator
Helicase(?)
Origin RecognitionComplex
Helicase(?)Loaders
Kinases
Primase
Polymerase
Using both Biochemistry and Genetics to understand function
Nucleic Acids
Structural Analysis of Intermediates
Complexes
Size
Shape
DS versus SS
Topology
Modification
Covalent Linkages
Proteins
Modification
Ligand Binding
Conformation
Covalent Linkages
Composition
Stoichiometry
Conformation
Interacting SequencesStrand Pairing
Examples of structural features of intermediates that can be monitored
Cofactor (NTP) Status
Interacting Domains
2-Stage Model for Protein Assembly During Replication Initiation
Pre-RC Pre-ICPost-RC
Initiation
CDK Cdc7-Dbf4
License Trigger
GINS
M Phase G1 Phase S Phase
Using both Biochemistry and Genetics to understand function
Metazoans have CDK-independent mechanisms to block re-initiation
The cell cycle control of replication must be highly efficient
X X X
Fidelity: > 99.999% block for genome with 50,000 origins
X X X
Hayles et al. Cell 1994 Cyclin dependent kinases implicated