Date post: | 17-Aug-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | selene-g-parekh-md-mba |
View: | 93 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Ankle Arthritis & Fusion:Open, Mini, Arthroscopic
Selene G. Parekh, MD, MBAAssociate Professor of Surgery
Partner, North Carolina Orthopaedic ClinicDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery
Adjunct Faculty Fuqua Business SchoolDuke University
Durham, NC919.471.9622
http://seleneparekhmd.comTwitter: @seleneparekhmd
Ankle Arthritis• Ankle is more commonly injured than any other joint in
the body
• Subject to more WB force per cm2 than any other joint
• Prevalence of ankle arthritis is 9 x’s lower than at the hip or knee
• Trauma is the most common cause• Ankle sprains, ankle fx, pilon fx …
Indications
• Arthrosis
• Pain
• Deformity
• Failed TAR
• Charcot ankle
• Degenerative Arthritis• Rheumatoid Arthritis• Post Traumatic/ Acquired Deformity• Instability from Paralytic Disorders• Neuropathic Joint• Failed Total Ankle Replacement
Surgical Considerations
• Minimal periosteal stripping
• Rigid internal fixation• Screws• Plates
• External fixation
• Attention to alignment and position• Plantigrade foot• 5-7 deg valgus• Neutral to 5 degrees DF• Rotation equal to other side• Posterior displacement: anterior-anterior
Preoperative Planning
• R/O subtalar DJD• May require CT scan
• May need combined fusion of both joints
Preoperative Planning
• R/O AVN talus• May require MRI
• May require bone graft
• May require tibio-calcaneal fusion
Preoperative Planning
• R/O fixed equinus
• Achilles contracture• TAL• Gastroc recession
• Anterior osteophytes• Excision of osteophytes• +/- tendoachilles lengthening
Preoperative Planning
• Varus or Valgus deformity• Plafond fracture• Talar collapse
• Bone grafting
• Osteotomy
Problems
• Nonunion rate – 0 – 40%
• Initial pain relief can be elusive
• Functional limitations• Uneven surfaces>stairs>objects from floor=driving
• Shoe modifications• SACH heel/rocker-bottom sole
• Adjacent joint degeneration• 50% arthroses within 7 yrs
Concepts
• Technical considerations– In-situ fusion
• Usually no deformity
– Deformity-correcting fusion
Concepts
• Soft tissue considerations– Avoid placing tension on skin edges
– Utilize full-thickness flaps
– Cognizant of cutaneous nerves
Surgical Principles
• Create broad, congruent cancellous surfaces• Remove all cartilage• Feather and penetrate into subchondral bone
• Use bone graft or substitutes to fill defects
• Stabilize w/ rigid fixation
• Appropriate alignment to create a plantigrade foot
Complications
• Infections– Careful soft tissue handling, removal of devitalized
tissue, prevention of hematoma
• Nerve disruption/entrapment
• Nonunion– Prepare joint, adequate fixation
• Malalignment
Ankle Fusions - Open
• Advantages• Easier visualization
• Ability to address deformity
• Better opposition of joint surfaces
• Disadvantages• More soft tissue dissection
Open
• Lateral/Transfibular approach• Never a TAR candidate
• Posterior• Poor anterior or lateral skin
• Anterior• All others
Open: Lateral
• Position: supine• Incision
• 10cm prox to tip of fibula base of 4th MT
• Structure at risk• Anterior branch sural n.• Peroneals
Open: Lateral
• Full thickness flaps• Periosteum of fibula stripped anteriorly and
posteriorly• Protect peroneals
Open: Lateral
• Remove osteophytes
• Remove cartilage and subchondral bone
• Feather cancellous surfaces
Open: Posterior
• Position: prone• Incision
• 10-12cm from glabourous skin
• Structure at risk• Sural n.• Tibial n.• Achilles • FHL tendon
Open: Anterior
• Position: supine• Incision
• 1 fingerbreadth lateral to ant tibial spine• 10cm (2/3 prox, 1/3 distal)
• Structure at risk• Medial branch SPN• EHL, TA
• Position: supine• Extended scope portals• Use lamina spreaders• Debride joint• Only do if no deformity• Minimally invasive and good
results
Mini-Open
Mini-Open
• Place laminar spreader in one wound and prepare from the other
• Posterior 1/3 ankle difficult to visualize
• Prepare joint
• Position and fixation with screws
Mini-Open Results
• Early radiographic evidence on healing @ 6wks
Paremain, 1996.
• Clinical fusion = 100%
Ankle Fusions - Arthroscopic
• Advantages• Minimal dissection
• Decreased wound healing
• Minimal interference with surrounding tissue
• Disadvantages• Technically challenging
• Less optimal fusion surface
• Inability to correct deformity
Ankle Arthrodeses: SAA
• Indications
– Similar to open
– Minimal deformity of ankle• Limited ability to correct varus/valgus tilt
Ankle Arthrodeses: SAA
• Prepare room for ankle arthroscopy
• Distract• Non/invasive
• Aggressive shaver for anterior synovectomy
Surgical Armamentarium
• Small joint arthroscope 2.7 30 degree• Currette small joint (need long narrow shaft and
curved if available)• Large joint shaver
• 4.0 round burr• 5.5 shaver aggressive• Yankauer suction tip
• Noninvasive ankle distractor
Ankle Arthrodeses: SAA
• Residual cartilage removed
• Shaver/currettes
• Burr used to make pockmarks• Fluid on/off
Ankle Arthrodeses: SAA
• Average 2.5 hours Ogilvie-Harris ,1993
• Complication rate 9.8% Ferkel, 1993
• 50% nerve injury
• Union rate of 100% Myerson, 1989
• 34/35 overall fusion rate Ferkel, 2005
• 31/35 solid fusion arthroscopically Jerosch ,2005
Ankle Arthrodeses: Open vs. SAA
• SAA– Less morbidity– Decreased time to fusion
• 4 – 8 wks less
• Open– Can address deformities
Ankle Arthrodeses: Open
• Alignment & fixation• Ant aspect of talus aligns ant cortex of tibia
• Screws• W/in sinus tarsi, above lat process• Aim screws medially & as proximal as possible• Ensure all threads are in proximal piece
Ankle Fusions - Internal Fixation Options
• 2 Parallel Screws - optimal compression
• 2 Crossed Screws - optimal stability
• 2 Parallel and one Cross Screw
• 2 Parallel and one P-A screw
• Solid arthrodesis 12 weeks (no BG), 14 wks (BG)
• AOFAS from 37 to 68. • 93% were satisfied. No complications .• CONCLUSION: The anterior double plating
system: Reliable method to achieve solid tibiotalar arthrodesis, even with loss of bone , e.g. failed TAA
Anterior double plating for rigid fixation of isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis.
Plaass C, Knupp M, Barg A, Hintermann B. Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Jul;30(7):631-9.
External Fixation
• Advantages• Avoid metal in infected bone• Better control in poor quality bone• May lengthen and fuse at some time - Ilizarov
• Disadvantage• Pin tract infections• Patient acceptance of fixator• Pin breakage