Date post: | 03-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | makrand-agrawal |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 25
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
1/25
Legal Aspects of Business Project
MBA-General
Amity Business School, Noida
Corporate Social Responsibility
Submitted to: Mrs Shinu Vig Submitted by: Anvita Bhatnagar (B3)
Renuka Chaudhary (B13)
Nakul Arora(B23)
Akshay Neelkantham(B33)
Makrand Agrawal(B43)
Amit Chahal(B53)
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
2/25
Certificate
This is to certify that Anvita Bhatnagar, Renuka chaudhary, Nakul Arora, Akshay
Neelkantham, Makrand Agrawal and Amit Chahal all students of 1st year MBA
General of Amity Business School have completed their Legal Aspect of Businessproject on Corporate Social Responsibility under my supervision. They have
shown utmost sincerity in the completion of this project. I Mrs Shinu Vig hereby
certify that this project confirms to the guidelines issued by the Amity Business
School.
Mrs Shinu Vig
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
3/25
Acknowledgement
We would like to express our heartfelt gratitude towards our LAB teacher Mrs
Shinu Vig for giving us the opportunity to work on the project. It was truly
knowledgeable and enriching experience. Thank you once again maam for
entrusting us with the project and for all the help and support throughout the
project.
Anvita Bhatnagar (B43) Renuka Chaudhary(B13)
Nakul Arora (B33) Akshay Neelkantham( B33)
Makrand Agrawal(B43) Amit Chahal(B53)
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
4/25
Index
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
5/25
Corporate social responsibility
Developing CSR takes a long time. There is no simple definition because CSR has no
definite limits and it is voluntarily established. It is a trend which is focused on the
change from short-term tasks to long-term tasks. In CSR companies behavior is such
that inside needs and outside needs are covered. They contribute to tenable and
acceptable growth and generally help to improve the overall situation of society. CSR
integrates the attitudes, practices and procedures into the company strategy at the
highest level of management. It requests a change from the profit only level to the
wider level Three Pspeople, planet, profit. The triple-bottom-line means that the
company is focused on economic growth and environmental and social aspects of its
activities. The company is a part of society and society influences it. There are a lot of
definitions of CSR but here are the most well-known:
CSR is a voluntary integration of the social and environmental aspects in the
everyday company activities and relations with the stakeholders .
CSR is a way of an enterprise which follows ethical, legal, commerci al and social
expectations .
CSR is a continual obligation of companies to be ethical and contribute to economic
growth and at the same time improve the quality of employees lives and their families
and local and global society, .
Three Fundamental Principles of CSR
CSR is based on three fundamental principles.
They are economic, social and environmental. Each part of CSR contains a lot of
different activities depending on the type of enterprise and the requirements of
stakeholders.
Economic area:
Transparent enterprise is expected from the company. A positive relationship with
investors, customers, suppliers and others business partners is also expected. The
impacts of the company on the economy at local, national and global levels are
monitored.
Ethical codex creation
Transparency
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
6/25
Best practice management
Corruption rejection
Relation with stockholders
Relation to customers / consumers
Relation to suppliers
Relation to investors
Protection of intellectual property
Social area :
In the social area, behaviour is focused on the attitude to employees and on supporting
the local community. The company influences the standard of living, health, safety,
education and cultural development of citizens.
The company is aware of its impact on the living and inanimate nature in the
environment. This includes the ecosystem, land, air and water. There is an assumption
that the company will protect nature and natural resources.
Environmental area :
Stakeholders
Environmental groups
Otherenvironmental groups
Environmental area CSR activities
Environmentally friendly manufacturing, products and services
Compliance with regulations and standards (ISO, EMAS, etc.)
Environmentally friendly company policy (recycling, using of environmentally friendlyproducts)
Reduction of impacts on environment
MAIN FEATURES OF CSR
Triple-bottom-line economic, social and environmental.
Voluntary all activities are done voluntarily.
Stakeholders dialogue integration of all participants.
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
7/25
Long-term period all activities are done over a long-term period.
Credibility increasing company credibility.
We have seen the business sector generating wealth and value for the shareholders in
the last sixty years, but simultaneously we also have the problems of poverty,
unemployment, illiteracy, malnutrition etc. facing the nation. The corporate growth is
sometimes seen as widening the gap between the India and Bharat through its income
skewing capability. This gap needs to be bridged. While the Government undertakes
extensive developmental initiatives through a series of sectoral programs ,the
business sector also needs to take the responsibility of exhibiting socially
responsible business practices that ensures the distribution of wealth and well-being of
the communities in which the business operate. The subject of Corporate Social
Responsibility has evolved during last few decades from simple philanthropic
activities to integrating the interest of the business with that of the communities in
which it operates. By exhibiting socially, environmentally and ethically responsiblebehavior in governance of its operations, the business can generate value and long
term sustainability for itself while making positive contribution in the betterment of the
society.
The subject of Corporate Social Responsibility has evolved during last few decades
from simple philanthropic activities to integrating the interest of the business with
that of the communities in which it operates. By exhibiting socially, environmentally
and ethically responsible behavior in governance of its operations, the business can
generate value and long term sustainability for itself while making positive contribution
in the betterment of the society.
.What is the importance of corporate social responsibility?
1) Organizations understanding their role in developing a society
2) Awareness among business houses, corporate bodies, and the people.
Versatile, profitable, and dynamic businesses are the driving forces that build theeconomy of the country. We must remember that the growth of a country purelydepends on the growth of the society and the people in the society.
There is a close relationship between CSR and the law. The main instrumentgovernments use to address a firms social, environmental and economic impacts is thelaw. Many countries have a wide range of laws, whether at the national, state or locallevels of government, relating to consumers, workers, health and safety, human rightsand environmental protection, bribery and corruption, corporate governance andtaxation. A firms CSR approach should begin by ensuring fu ll compliance with thoselaws already in place. No matter how good a CSR policy may be, failure to observe the
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
8/25
law will undermine other good efforts. Looking ahead, the CSR activities of firms can beseen as a proactive method of addressing potentially problematic conduct before itattracts legal attention.
A key feature of the emerging CSR debate is the difference between a compliance
mentality (i.e., only doing those things that are required) and a value driven mentality(i.e., using a CSR approach to innovate and seek new markets). Some commentators
argue that a compliance-based approach does not help business, because it tends not
to drive innovation and the out of the box thinking they see as necessary in the rapidly
changing business world. That said, a number of specific legal aspects are worth
mentioning.
Performance reporting and the law: In many jurisdictions there are laws in
place requiring firms in particular sectors to publicly disclose certain of their
practices and activities. The U.K. Companies Act 2006, for example, requires
publicly-listed companies to report on a number of specific issues where they arenecessary to understanding the companys business. These include
environmental matters (including the impact of the companys business on the
environment), the companys employees, social and community issues, and risks
through the company supply chains. Similar provisions also exist in France and
across the EU.
Corporate governance and disclosure: Social and environmental issues are
increasingly being seen as integral components of the corporate governance
agenda. In many countries firms issuing securities are required to publicly
disclose their corporate governance practices and comply with local guidelines
on the subject. A 2005 report by the international law firm Freshfields, Bruckhausand Deringer concluded that under the current legal systems of many countries,
directors might be in breach of their fiduciary duties if they did not take into
account environmental, social and governance issues.
Bribery: CSR also stresses that firms should adopt responsible practices
wherever they operate. National laws making it illegal to bribe foreign officials to
obtain or retain business on the subject are often based on the 1997 OECD
Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International
Business Transactions, and the 2003 UN Convention Against Corruption.
Requirements under different jurisdictions: It is important to be aware of the
varying legal requirements of different countries. In the U.K., for example,
legislation requires pension fund trustees to publish a comment in their
investment statements on the extent to which their investment policies address
social, ethical and environmental issues. As noted above, in European countries
laws require companies to report on their social and environmental performance.
In the U.S., a number of firms have been sued under the Alien Tort Claims Act
(e.g., Doe v. Unocal), which raises the possibility that corporate liability could be
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
9/25
established through transnational civil litigation. The U.S. has also significantly
revised its corporate governance legislation in recent years, in particular, passing
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in 2002 which establishes stricter standards for all U.S.
public company boards, management and public accounting firms. At the United
Nations, a Special Representative on Business and Human Rights to the
Secretary General was appointed in July 2005. The Special Representative is
expected to identify standards of corporate responsibility and accountability,
enhance understanding and recognition of these standards, and issue
recommendations on future United Nations work regarding business and human
rights issues.
Parliamentary engagement: Government interest in CSR issues takes many
forms. Some governments have issued CSR guidance and play a wide range of
partnering, facilitating and profiling roles. In some countries, parliaments have
also become engaged. On 13 March 2007, the European Parliament adopted aresolution on CSR in which it expressed the view that increasing social and
environmental responsibility by business, linked to the principle of corporate
accountability, represents an essential element of the European social
modelThe Australian government conducted two high-level enquiries into the
relationship between business and CSR in 2006. The Parliamentary Joint
Committee on Corporations and Financial Services enquiry Corporate
Responsibility: Managing risk and creating value recommended the wide
adoption of corporate responsibility, and urged industry associations to actively
promote CSR to their members. The Corporations and Markets Advisory
Committee report The Social Responsibility of Corporations, noted that CSRissues presented a conundrumbetween the business imperative and wider
societal pressure. A balanced approach, it concluded, under which companies
are judged according to their overall economic and other contributions and
impacts, including how they manage social and environmental issues relevant to
their business, is more productive and meaningful.A Spanish parliamentary sub-
commission also conducted a review into measures to promote CSR, and
reported in 2006.
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
10/25
Does Corporate Social Responsibility Increase Profits?
It is generally held that corporate social responsibility (CSR) could increase companyprofits and thus most large companies are actively engaged in it. But few executivesand managers are aware of the research on this important subject .The research doesshow that it may improve profits. However, linking profit growth to abstract variables that
are frequently difficult to define is a challenging task.
Most executives believe that CSR can improve profits. They understand that CSR can
promote respect for their company in the marketplace which can result in higher sales,
enhance employee loyalty and attract better personnel to the firm. Also, CSR activities
focusing on sustainability issues may lower costs and improve efficiencies as well. An
added advantage for public companies is that aggressive CSR activities may help them
gain a possible listing in the FTSE or Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes, or other similar
indices. This may enhance the companys stock price, making executives stock and
stock options more profitable and shareholders happier.
Advantages of CSR:
A good reputation makes it easier to recruit employees.
Employees may stay longer, reducing the costs and disruption of recruitment and
retraining.
Employees are better motivated and more productive.
CSR helps ensure you comply with regulatory requirements.
Activities such as involvement with the local community are ideal opportunities to
generate positive press coverage.
Good relationships with local authorities make doing business easier. See the page
in this guide on how to work with the local community. Understanding the wider impact of your business can help you develop new
products and services.
CSR can make you more competitive and reduces the risk of sudden damage to
your reputation (and sales). Investors recognize this and are more willing to finance
you.
Disadvantages of CSR
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a prominent 21st century business ideology that
heightens expectations of companies regarding social and environmental standards.The results of CSR compliance are generally viewed as a good thing by most
companies. Challenges lie in allocating time and resources necessary to develop a CSR
approach that meets governmental and social standards and achieves compliance with
informal CSR guidelines related to social and environmental responsibility.
http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?itemId=1075408527&r.i=1075408491&r.l1=1074404796&r.l2=1074446322&r.l3=1075408468&r.t=RESOURCES&type=RESOURCEShttp://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?itemId=1075408527&r.i=1075408491&r.l1=1074404796&r.l2=1074446322&r.l3=1075408468&r.t=RESOURCES&type=RESOURCES7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
11/25
Role of Profit
One of the biggest features addressed by CSR is its intent to cause companies to
recognize responsibilities to stakeholders outside of shareholders. This includes
customers, communities, employees and suppliers. While proponents of CSR point out
the long-term benefits of taking care of these core relationships, shareholders are oftendeterred at the notion that companies will invest in anything that does not create
immediately obvious financial gain. With CSR, detecting measurable bottom line
benefits is a challenge as social and environmental programs are hard to account for
with regard to financial gain.
Competitive Disadvantage
One of the most common arguments companies make when indicating reluctance to
CSR policies is the disadvantage it causes against companies that do not. In other
words, if company A does its part to invest resources to take care of its communitiesand the environment and company B does not, company B retains its resources,
including money, for other business pursuits. Thus, without strict adherence industry
wide, some companies argue that they cannot fall behind by putting money into CSR
programs.
Loss of Focus
A main driver at the onset of CSR was increased interest in making the customer a
primary focus of business operations. This coincides with continued realization that
customer retention and loyalty are keys to long-term business success. Detractors of
CSR as a major component of corporate governance argue that guidelines have
expanded beyond this basic initial emphasis. David Vogel points out in his "CSR
Doesn't Pay" article for Forbes, that many companies that abide by CSR guidelines do
so more from fear of public backlash than because they believe it is good for long-term
business performance. He adds that most parties generally agree that taking care of
customers is good in the long run, but expensive requirements in human rights,
environmental sustainability and community development are too much to ask of many
companies.
Lasting Impact
How long CSR will remain a prominent business concern is a common question asked
by those who argue against CSR as a major concern with corporate governance.
According to the My Efficient Planet website, CSR has existed for more than 50 years.
However, its prominence as a major business consideration has certainly increased in
the 21st century due to heightened awareness of ethical issues in business and
environmental preservation standards. Detractors argue that CSR emphasis is a short-
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
12/25
term fad in response to prominent scandals like Enron, and current interest in green-
friendly practices.
Planning the CSR initiative
A long-term Corporate Social Responsibility Plan needs to be prepared matchingwith the long-term business plan;
This may be broken down into short-term and medium term plans, specifying
activities to be undertaken, budgets allocated, responsibilities and authorities
defined, and measurable results expected.
Implementation
ThePlan must clarify implementation guidelines involving:
Participation of Voluntary Organizations, Base-line Surveys Documentation of the experience Setting Up a CSR hub Monitoring and Evaluation.
Corporate Social Responsibility IN INDIA
Among other countries India has one of the richest traditions of CSR. Much has been
done in recent years to make Indian Entrepreneurs aware of social responsibility as an
important segment of their business activity but CSR in India has yet to receive
widespread recognition. If this goal has to be realised then the CSR approach ofcorporate has to be in line with their attitudes towards mainstream business- companies
setting clear objectives, undertaking potential investments, measuring and reporting
performance publicly.
The four phases of CSR development in India:
The history of CSR in India has its four phases which run parallel to India's historicaldevelopment and has resulted in different approaches towards CSR. However thephases are not static and the features of each phase may overlap other phases.
The First PhaseIn the first phase charity and philanthropy were the main drivers of CSR. Culture,religion, family values and tradition and industrialization had an influential effect onCSR. In the pre-industrialization period which lasted till 1850, wealthy merchants shareda part of their wealth with the wider society by way of setting up temples for a religiouscause. Moreover these merchants helped the society in getting over phases of famineand epidemics by providing food from their godowns and money and thus securing anintegral position in the society.With the arrival of the colonial rule in India from 1850s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrepreneurshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charitable_organizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philanthropyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrializationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrializationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philanthropyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charitable_organizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrepreneurshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/India7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
13/25
onwards the approach towards CSR was changed. The industrial families of the 19thcentury such as Tata, Godrej, Bajaj, Modi, Birla, Singhania were strongly inclinedtowards economic as well as social considerations. However it has been observed thattheir efforts towards social as well as industrial development were not only drivenselfless and religious motives but also influenced by caste groups and political
objectives.The Second Phase
In the second phase, during the independence movement, there was increased stresson Indian Industrialists to demonstrate their dedication towards the progress of thesociety. This was when Mahatma Gandhi introduced the notion of "trusteeship",according to which the industry leaders had to manage their wealth so as to benefit thecommon man. "I desire to end capitalism almost, if not quite, as much as the mostadvanced socialist. But our methods differ. My theory of trusteeship is no make-shift,
certainly no camouflage. I am confident that it will survive all other theories." This wasGandhi's words which highlights his argument towards his concept of "trusteeship".
Gandhi's influence put pressure on various Industrialists to act towards building thenation and its socio-economic development.[4]According to Gandhi, Indian companieswere supposed to be the "temples of modern India". Under his influence businessesestablished trusts for schools and colleges and also helped in setting up training andscientific institutions. The operations of the trusts were largely in line with Gandhi'sreforms which sought to abolish untouchability, encourage empowerment of women andrural development.
The Third Phase
The third phase of CSR (196080) had its relation to the element of"mixed economy",emergence ofPublic Sector Undertakings (PSUs) and laws relating labour and
environmental standards. During this period the private sector was forced to take abackseat. The public sector was seen as the prime mover of development. Because ofthe stringent legal rules and regulations surrounding the activities of the private sector,the period was described as an "era of command and control". The policy of industriallicensing, high taxes and restrictions on the private sector led to corporate malpractices.This led to enactment of legislation regarding corporate governance, labour andenvironmental issues. PSUs were set up by the state to ensure suitable distribution ofresources (wealth, food etc.) to the needy. However the public sector was effective onlyto a certain limited extent. This led to shift of expectation from the public to the privatesector and their active involvement in the socio-economic development of the country
became absolutely necessary. In 1965 Indian academicians, politicians andbusinessmen set up a national workshop on CSR aimed at reconciliation. Theyemphasized upon transparency, social accountability and regular stakeholderdialogues. In spite of such attempts the CSR failed to catch steam.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata_Grouphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godrej_Grouphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bajaj_Grouphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modi_Grouphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birla_familyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_independence_movementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahatma_Gandhihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_corporate_social_responsibility_in_India#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_corporate_social_responsibility_in_India#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_corporate_social_responsibility_in_India#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_economyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Sector_Undertakingshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Sector_Undertakingshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_economyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution_of_corporate_social_responsibility_in_India#cite_note-3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahatma_Gandhihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_independence_movementhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birla_familyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modi_Grouphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bajaj_Grouphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godrej_Grouphttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tata_Group7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
14/25
The Fourth Phase
In the fourth phase (1980 until the present) Indian companies started abandoning theirtraditional engagement with CSR and integrated it into a sustainable business strategy.In 1990s the first initiation towards globalization and economic liberalization wereundertaken. Controls and licensing system were partly done away with which gave a
boost to the economy the signs of which are very evident today. Increased growthmomentum of the economy helped Indian companies grow rapidly and this made themmore willing and able to contribute towards social cause. Globalization has transformedIndia into an important destination in terms of production and manufacturing bases ofTNCs are concerned. As Western markets are becoming more and more concernedabout and labour and environmental standards in the developing countries, Indiancompanies who export and produce goods for the developed world need to pay a closeattention to compliance with the international standards.
With the rapidly changing corporate environment, more functional autonomy,
operational freedom etc., CPSEs today are required to adopt CSR as a strategic
tool for sustainable growth
CSR in the present context, means not only investment of funds for social
activities but also integration of business processes with social processes.
In order to address the social needs of the community, viable projects need to be
identified to meet its requirements.
CPSEs may approach Corporate Social Responsibility as a professional
management process with a long-term strategy integrating it with corporate
strategies.
CSR activities may be planned in parallel to the business plan, looking at everypossible opportunity to link and integrate business plans with the social and
environmental concerns available
INDIAS REGULATORY HISTORY: TRANSPLANTING CORPORATE LAW
Indias current system of corporate governance is something of a hybrid. Like many
post-colonial countries, when India first gained its independence in 1947, it opted for a
socialist governance structure with many industries and enterprises controlled by the
state.In 1991, however, India experienced a massive financial crisis. The IMF agreed togrant India the loans it needed if it would liberalize its economy and privatize most
sectors.Since then, Indias economy has been growing at a rapid pace. To facilitate
foreign direct investment, India has lifted most of its recently enacted corporate law from
liberal American and British models. The economy is now functionally capitalist,
although the constitution remains socialist.It is largely this divide between adeveloping,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_liberalizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_liberalizationhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Globalization7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
15/25
once-socialist country with an impoverished populace and its booming, capitalistic
aspirations that the 2011 Companies Bill attempts to navigate.
Corporate Missteps and Government Responses: From Bhopal to Dabhol:
The public health disaster at Bhopal and the human rights fiasco at Dabhol, form the
backdrop for any discussion of corporate social responsibility in India.
The Bhopal Disaster:
Since the gas was highly toxic, the leak killed around 3,000 residents of the Madhya
Pradesh state in its immediate aftermath; the long-term death toll is estimated at
20,000, with as many as 100,000 more suffering from crippling disabilities.Union
Carbide eventually agreed to pay a $470 million settlement to the Indian government in
1989, although American executives continually refused toappear before Indian courtsfor criminal proceedings.Amnesty International report from 2004 claims that30% of
claims for injuries have been rejected, around 16,000 claims [remained] outstanding,
and most of the successful applicants received minimal amounts of compensation.
The Dabhol Disaster:
Ten years later, in 1993, Enron agreed to contract with the state government of
Maharashtra to build a multimillion-dollar power plant in Dabhol; at the time, India was
only able to provide power for five percent of its population.The plant was set to be the
largest Foreign Direct Investment in India at the time.When the Indian public learned
about the deal, there was massive protesting over handing foreign companies such a
profitable venture rather than using local labor.180 peaceful protestors were allegedly
beaten and arrested outside the companys gates.The price of fuel for the plant soared,
and the Maharashtra government was unable to pay the required price for electricity.
Enron sued on their contract, but the company, in the midst of its own scandal in the
United States, had to declare bankruptcy in 2001 before the lawsuit reached a
resolution. The Dabhol plant was subsequently bought by the state in an effort to save
the project.
THE PATH TO AND FROM MANDATORY CSR:
The 2009 Companies Bill and its 2011 counterpart represent the first major effort at
comprehensively overhauling corporate law in India since 1956.It will be landmark
legislation for a BRICS country, and the Indian legislature hopes that the Bill will pass
through Parliament during the budget session in Spring 2012.As one might expect, the
entire project is proceeding in the shadow of ever-growing foreign investment in India.
The Bills Statement of Objects and Reasons dwells on growth and international
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
16/25
investment at some length;its authors seem painfully eager to impress the global
business community. At the same time, the Bill proceeds in the wake of Bhopal and
Dahbol, as well as the more recent Satyam accounting scandal (akin to an Indian
version of Enron).
Despite Indias current left-leaning government, the bill is extremely economically liberaland pro-business. The mandatory CSR proposal, then, seems something of a
regulatory oddity, inserted by the finance committee after reviewing the Bill and adopted
enthusiastically by a fledgling Minister of Corporate Affairs. As one of the few elements
about the Bill that is uniquely Indian, its inception and context deserve some
examination.
The Bill observes that:
The expansion and growth of the Indian economy has . . . generated considerable
interest in the international investing community. However, there is a need for sustaininggrowth in a globalized and competitive environment. The increasing options and
avenues for international business, trade and capital flows have made it imperative for
the growing Indian economy to not only harness its entrepreneurial and economic
resources efficiently but also to be competitive in attracting investment to sustain the
impressive growth recorded by it in recent years. Many investors are also looking
towards the statutory and regulatory framework for the corporate sector in the country
while deciding on their investment options.
Yet it is difficult, as a country battling with poverty and inequality, to absorb so many
costs and risks without asking for anything in return.The LokSabhas legislative brief for the Bill highlights several major changes proposed
in the Bill to achieve its liberalizing goals, as well as a few concessions in favor of the
Indian people. The major aims of the Bill are to decrease regulation and to shift the
onus of oversight onto shareholders. The Bill makes some effort to address
corporategovernance in general through Western mechanisms such as formal, impartial
audits and an increased number of independent directors on boards.
The Bill, also allows shareholders to band together and file class action lawsuits, as this
kind of tort framework is currently unavailable in India, and it establishes a National
Company Law Tribunal to expeditiously handle these corporate lawsuits. It is, perhaps,worth noting that class action lawsuits will generally only be available to shareholders
not to the average Indianand that companies themselves have long advocated for a
more expeditious corporate law system, as it would reduce the uncertainty inherent in
international litigation. The Bill, then, may be even more pro-business than it seems at
first glance.
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
17/25
The Specter of Mandatory CSR
The changes listed in the previous Section were the major legal revisions laid out by the
original Bill, as proposed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. The Bill then went to
Indias Finance Committee for review before being reported to Parliament. The Finance
Committee, perhaps realizing the popular backlash that might result from such anunabashedly pro-business bill, inserted several new clauses to make the bill slightly
more pro-development.
The original proposal required moderate-sized and large companies to set aside two
percent of their profit margin averaged over the past three years on socially responsible
expenditures. The proposal gave no guidance as to what corporate social
responsibility meant in the context of the Bill, and provided no enforcement mechanism
other than mandated reporting:In response to the Committees overwhelming concerns,
the Ministry of Corporate Affairs have agreed that the Bill may now include provisions to
mandate that every company having [(net worth of rupees 500 crore or more, orturnover of rupees 1000 crore or more)] or [a net profit of rupees 5 crore or more during
a year] shall be required to formulate a CSR Policy to ensure that every year at least
2% of its average net profits during the three immediately preceding financial years shall
be spent on CSR activities as may be approved and specified by the company. The
directors shall be required to make suitable disclosures in this regard in their report to
members.
The Ministry wanted shareholders to be engaged in determining how to expend the
CSR funds and envisioned a system in which each industry would contribute in a
manner commensurate with their expertise. Chemical companies, for example, mightundertake environmental initiatives, while IT companies could further technology
education. The Minister, Murli Deora acknowledged readily that this was the first time
and historically it may be the first time in the world that a country considered mandating
expenditures for the public good, rather than simply taxing companies or leaving them
to their own devices. He also acknowledged that there was an argument as to whether
the Government should mandateanything, but the Ministry, at least initially,
enthusiastically adopted the Committees mandatory proposal.
Corporate Backlash:
Most of India Inc. was immediately up in arms. The Confederation of Indian Industry
asserted, "The law should not specify any amount to be spent on CSR activities. It
should be left to the decision of the board."Other companies echoed that sentiment,
claiming that making CSR mandatory takes away from its core principles. What
companies spend on community welfare, education, health, development and
environmental activism is for them to decide.Infosys Technologies CEO Kris
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
18/25
Gopalakrishnan, the Managing Director of Sonata Software B. Ramaswamy, Wipro
Chairman AzimPremji, and Piramal Group Chairman Ajay Pirama, all openly spoke out
against the measure.
Voluntary CSR in India, however, has a mixed track record at best. In 2006, despite its
economic boom, India spent only $5 billion, or 0.6 percent of its GDPon corporateresponsibility .Many companies claim to have CSR policies in place: eighty percent of
the private multinationals and half of the private national companies inIndia.Yet most
organizations cannot or will not report exactly how much they spend on CSR.They claim
that there is no relationship between their profits and CSR, and that the board has a
right to determine CSR spending on an ad hoc basis.
The Bill now requires the boards of moderate-sized and large companies to convene a
Corporate Social Responsibility Committee and to approve a Corporate Social
Responsibility Policy. This policy must be disclosed and posted on the companys
website. The Bill even gives some guidance as to what constitutes CSR, although thedefinition remains broad. Schedule VII of the Bill lists several possible genres of CSR
expenditure, ranging from eradicating extreme hunger and poverty to promotion of
education to ensuring environmental sustainability. The media expects the Bill to pass
in the 2012 budget session.
Indias proposal, while unusual, could be viewed as a reasonable effort at furthering
development and equality while avoiding imposing additional taxes as such.
THE EFFICACY OF MANDATORY CSR IN THE INDIAN CONTEXT:
The theoretical pressures, however, seem to have shaped the Indian proposal from its
inception: on the one hand, the proposal acknowledges the realities of the global
economys liberal economic bent and hence avoids excessive administrative red tape;
on the other, it acknowledges the equally pressing necessity of facilitating development
and avoiding inflammatory wealth disparities. Indias proposal may not be ideal, but it is,
in some sense, an innovation born of economic necessity. As such, the unique nature of
the proposal and the nuances of the political climate that produced it should not be
ignored. The proposal may be the first in a new wave of creative capitalist solutions
proposed by foreign legislatures to solve the problem of growing inequality in the wake
of rapid economic growth.
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
19/25
Arguments Against Mandating CSR Spending:
These arguments fall into two categories: those that argue that mandatory CSR
spending goes too far, and those that argue that mandatory CSR spending does not go
far enough.
Those, like Friedman, Hannsman, or Macey, who would argue that mandatory CSR
spending goes too far, would insist that the proposal creates market inefficiencies that
may damage the economy in the long run. India, after all, has been doing quite well
under its liberal economic regime. Incredibly, its GDP has been increasing at a rate of
almost eight percent per year.It is one of the fastest-growing economies in the
world.Even the lower classes have benefited from privatization and
globalization.Although millions of Indians remain in poverty, millions more have broken
past the poverty line and are edging closer to a middle-class existence.
Perhaps the most salient argument against mandatory spending is that it might put Indiaat a competitive disadvantage in the global marketplace and might slow or reverse the
countrys near-miraculous growth. Those who already have little might, contrary to the
proposals aims, fall farther away from the prospect of a middle-class lifestyle. Even if
we were to accept Greenfields premise that inequality is a market imperfection
,intervening at this early juncturebefore a country like India has developed sufficient
wealthmight ultimately be counter-productive and may shrink the economy.
Others would contend that the market does require intervention, and quickly. They
would argue, that the proposal is not developed or regulatory enough. Without a
coercive enforcement mechanism, it is unlikely that the law would garner sufficientcompliance. In addition, the law does not specify in sufficient detail the desired target of
CSR spending, so it is unclear exactly what compliance would entail. Since the law is so
vague and does not envision any formal review process, it may barely add to the states
regulatory capacity or legitimacy. In other words, mandatory CSR could remain largely
voluntary. It might be preferable, some would say, to impose a tax so that the
government would be actually obtain funding to reform its infrastructure in a systematic
and democratic way.
Arguments in Favor of Mandating CSR Spending:
The major advantage of mandating CSR spending, as opposed to levying additional
taxes, would be the preservation of the companys autonomy in selecting how its funds
are used. To some extent, the corporation would be free to invest its funds in the
community directly or in a local non-profit or national NGO. Companies could use the
money to further minimize externalities, beyond the requirements of environmental law,
or they could choose to create positive externalities by building schools or providing
workers with more comprehensive benefits. Knowing that each corporation might bring
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
20/25
two percent of its profits to the community for re-investment, community members might
be far more enthusiastic about the potential of industry coming to their neighborhood.
Re-investing in communities can build reputational legitimacy, trust, and reciprocity from
which companies may ultimately benefit. If community members and other stakeholders
feel that the company is extending its fiduciary duty to encompass their well being, thenthey may feel some positive duty to act in the companys best interest in return.
Greenfield, for instance, asserts that when workers feel that they are being treated with
respect and fairness, they require less monitoring to elicit their best efforts. The
reduction in monitoring costs may ultimately reduce overhead and create a better work
environment. Similarly, local residents who have been treated well by the company
educated in its school or nursed in its hospitalare less likely to organize protests and
create extra costs when and if the company does make a mistake.
Most companies that have CSR programs (around fifty-six percent) spend their money
locally. The vast majority invest in education (eighty-two percent) or health (eighty-onepercent) or on the environment. Schools and hospitals, may simply engender more
recognition, reciprocity, and good-will in communities since they are much more visible.
Additionally, companies may invest their money more efficiently than the government
would, and in ways that will inure to their long-term benefit. Investing in schools
promises to have direct returns for the company. A more educated local workforce is
certainly a boon to any industry, especially the information technology sector, which
continues to grow in India. Given the level of corruption that persists in many developing
countries, corporations may actually produce more impactful public goods than
governments at a lower cost.
The second major argument for mandatory CSR spending is that countries like India are
desperately in need of funding for development. Hampered by a liberal and competitive
global economy, it is difficult for them to impose steep taxes or comprehensive
regulation. It makes good sense to require them to contribute to the public good
primarily by making money, but secondarily by spending some portion of it on
development. Two percent CSR spending would simply bring India in line with CSR
expenditures in the United States,and the money for development is certainly more
desperately needed in India, where at least one-fifth of citizens live in poverty and
where the public health and education systems are famously dysfunctional .
CONCLUSION:
State-driven corporate social responsibility cuts against the thrust of most current CSR
practice and scholarship, which generally focus on voluntary business-driven initiatives
and international agreements. Nevertheless, as the popularity of CSR surges, more and
more national and international players will be seeking to harness the power of
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
21/25
corporate-funded investment in social welfare projects.As such, proponents of CSR and
of development may want to encourage India to further develop this proposal and
similar initiatives that are responsive to its current circumstances, rather than
automatically rejecting ideas that do not fit neatly into pre-established intellectual
categories.
The proposal to increase social responsibility may bring governments one step closer to
meeting the twin goals of sustaining growth while at the same time addressing troubling
inequality Accordingly, Indias state-based proposal may represent merely the beginning
of a new wave of development in the realm of corporate social responsibility. A product
of unique historical exigencies, the proposal may represent a new type of solution to an
increasingly pressing international problem.
CSR Practices of Tata Group in India
A Tata Company shall be committed to be a good corporate citizen not only incompliance with all relevant laws and regulations but also by actively assisting inthe improvement of the quality of life of the people in the communities in which itoperates with the objective of making them self reliant. Such social responsibilitywould comprises, to initiate and support community initiatives in the field ofcommunity health and family welfare, water management, vocational training,education and literacy and encourage application of modern scientific andmanagerial techniques and expertise. This will be reviewed periodically inconsonance with national and regional priorities. The company would also nottreat these activities as optional ones but would strive to incorporate them asintegral part of its business plan. The company would also encourage
volunteering amongst its employees and help them to work in the communities.Tata companies are encouraged to develop social accounting systems and tocarry out social audit of their operations.
Benchmarking Corporate Social Responsibility
A study on Benchmarking Corporate Social Responsibility Activities, by the GasAuthority of India Limited (GAIL), finds Tata Steel creating a benchmark in corporatesocial responsibility (CSR). The study has been based on Organisation Dynamics. Thepurpose of the study was to identify the best practices in CSR activities available in TataSteel and enable GAIL to undertake the interventions more effectively and in a morefocused manner. Tata Steel is a pioneer in the concept of CSR. It believes that theloyalty and commitment of its employees depends upon the quality of life they are
provided with at work and at home. Consistent with the Group Purpose, Tata Steel hasdeclared in its vision statement that it will constantly strive to improve the quality of lifeof the communities it serves through excellence in all facets of its activities. Thecompany has received a number of awards in recognition of its CSR efforts. The mostrecent testimony to Tata Steels contribution is The Energy & Resources Institute (TERI)
Award conferred on it in recognition of corporate leadership for good corporatecitizenship and sustainable initiatives. Tata Steel is the only Indian company to havepledged to translate the Global Compact principles on human rights, labour and
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
22/25
environment into practice and was conferred the Global Business Coalition Award forBusiness Excellence in the Community for HIV /AIDS. Over the years, the nature of thecompanys involvement with the community has undergone a change. It has movedaway from charity and dependence to empowerment and partnership. The many facetsof Tata Steels efforts are medical and health services in the rural and semi-urban
areas, sports, womens health and education, water harvesting and tribal development,relief and rehabilitation and income generation, among others.
Tata Corps of Volunteers: Giving out the Best from Tata EmployeesMission Statement
We continue to evolve a common direction to enrich the Tata Way on social -responsibility in order to strengthen out belief in serving the society, through all Tataemployees in all our Companies, by working as volunteers, while also learning from thecommunity. We constantly strive together to improve processes, to stretch capabilities,to share skills, expertise and talents, in order to build strong and self-reliant
communities. We believe this enriches our personalities, improves our attitude towardslife and makes us better citizens; and accordingly, better employees of our respectiveCompanies.
Tata Steels CSR Policy
On unveiling Tata Steels Corporate Social Responsibility Policy, its Managing Director,Mr. B. Muthuraman, said; Tata Steel believes that the primary purpose of a bus iness isto improve the quality of life of people. Tata Steel will volunteer its resources, to theextent it can reasonably afford, to sustain and improve the quality of life of the people ofthe areas in which it operates. Tata Steels commitment to its corporate social
responsibility (CSR) also finds reflection in its adoption of the Corporate CitizenshipIndex, Tata Business Excellence Model and the Tata Index for SustainableDevelopment. Tata Steel spends 5-7 per cent of its profit after tax on several CSRinitiatives. Broadly speaking, the companys CSR initiatives are spread across threecore areas - employee welfare, the environment and the welfare of the community atlarge. Under this broad spectrum, diverse areas are covered. These includeenvironment management, economic development, employee relations, civic amenitiesand community services, healthcare, sports and adventure, relief during naturalcalamities, education, arts and culture and social welfare.
(a) Supports Social Welfare Organisations : To achieve its desired objectives in this
regard, Tata Steel supports various social welfare organisations. They include the TataSteel Rural Development Society, Tribal Cultural Society, Tata Steel Foundation forFamily Initiatives, National Association for the Blind, Shishu Niketan, School of Hope,Centre for Hearing Impaired Children and the Indian Red Cross Society, EastSinghbhum. Tata Steel has hosted 12 Lifeline Expresses in association with the Ministryof Railways, Impact India Foundation and the Government of Jharkhand. It has servedover 50,000 people. Five thousand people have availed of surgical facilities and over1,000 people received aids and appliances. In all, over seven Lakh rural and another
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
23/25
seven Lakh urban population have been benefited by the CSR activities of Tata Steel.CSR initiatives on the rural front include training in agriculture that is provided tovillagers in the Saraikela Kharsawa area through the village development committees.In collaboration with the Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy and the Confederation ofIndian Industry, focus is laid on renewable energy for rural livelihoods. Integrated
wasteland development programmes have been taken up as also watersheddevelopment programmes for rain-fed areas.
(b) Self-Help Groups (SHGs):
The National Horticulture Mission programme that has been taken up in collaborationwith the Government of Jharkhand has already benefited more than a thousandhouseholds. Over 500 self-help groups are currently operating under various povertyalleviation programmes. Of this, over 200 are engaged in activities of income generationthorough micro enterprises. Womens empowerment programmes through Self-HelpGroups have been extended to 700 villages. Between 2003 and 2006, the maternal andinfant survival project had a coverage area of 42 villages in Gamharia block in Seraikela
Kharsawa even as a replication project was taken up in Rajnagar block. For providingportable water to rural communities 2,600 tube wells have been installed for the benefitof over four Lakh people.
(c.) Healthcare Projects:
Other CSR activities of Tata Steel include facilitation of child education, immunizationand childcare, plantation activities, creation of awareness of AIDS, healthcare projectsand promotion of sporting activities such as football and archery. In its 100th year, theTata Steel Centenary Project has just been announced.
(d) Economic Empowerment:
A programme aimed at economic empowerment through improvised agriculture will betaken up in three backward tribal blocks in Jharkhand, Orissa and Chhattisgarh. Acorpus of Rs 100 crore has been earmarked for the purpose and the programme isexpected to benefit 40,000 tribal living in over 400 villages in these three States.
Low key and Profile
For Tata Steel, discharging its CSR mandate is something that is generally kept
low key. And that is how the companys visionary founder wanted it to be, when
he said that We do not claim to be more unselfish, more generous and more
philanthropic than other people. But we think we started on sound and
straightforward business principles, considering the interests of the shareholder,
our own, and the health and welfare of the employees, the sure foundation of our
prosperity.
Initiatives by the other Indian companies
DLF building in India:
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
24/25
While DLF continues to create world-class infrastructure throughout India, it has not lost
sight of its responsibilities as a change agent for accelerating the pace of social and
economic transformation across various segments to complement the efforts of the
government.
Swapana Sarthak Informal School
In fact DLF's first social responsibility interventions date back to the time that DLF
was setting up the DLF township in Gurgaon when instead of turning a blind eye to
the local problems, DLF decided to undertake internal development work in the
villages of Nathupur, Chakarpur and Wazirabad by contributing through construction
of internal village roads, additional rooms in the schools and internal village
electrification. At around the same time, DLF initiated its first education initiative by
setting up the Swapana Sarthak informal school for children of the construction
workers. This school manned by trained volunteers conducts classes for children
who are ill equipped to join regular school or those who cannot afford to do so. Allchildren enrolled are provided with free uniforms, mid day meals and learning
material. Starting from merely 10 students, the school today has on roll 220
students. Initially getting the children out of their homes and instilling a sense of
personal hygiene and cleanliness was a challenge and the volunteers had to really
work on them to ensure the present stat
DLF Learning Excellence Centres
Taking the education initiative ahead, DLF partnered with Pratham in May 2007 and set
up DLF Learning Excellence Centres in 25 villages by involving the government
schools, community teachers and introducing innovative teaching learning material. The
main hurdles faced during the project were lack of adequate means of public transport
and resistance from the local community to involve the women. However, these were
overcome through a sustained education and awareness campaign conducted across
the entire village community and by taking the village Panchayats into confidence. This
is an ongoing project likely to benefit 1100 students over a period of one year.
Rural Primary Health Centres
In March 2007, DLF decided to focus on another hitherto neglected but vital area rural
healthcare. It was decided to set up Rural Primary Health Centres in villages to provide
free medical consultancy, health checkups and subsidized medicines to the villagers.
The first Primary Health Centre was set up at Village Shikohpur in August 2007 in
7/29/2019 Legal Aspects of Business-Corporate Social Responsibility
25/25
association with an NGO Deepalaya. It is proposed to set up six such centres in the
present financial year.
Larsen & Toubro (L & T) Limited
Considering that construction industry is the second largest employer in India afteragriculture, employing about 32 million-strong workforce, L&T set out to regulate and
promote Construction Vocational Training (CVT) in India by establishing a Construction
Skills Training Institute (CSTI) on a 5.5 acre land, close to its Construction Division
Headquarters at Manapakkam, Chennai. CSTI imparts, totally free of cost, basic training
in formwork, carpentry, masonry, bar-bending, plumbing and sanitary, scaffolder and
electrical wireman trades to a wide spectrum of the rural poor.
As a result of the good response it received in Chennai, CSTI set up a branch at
Panvel, Mumbai, initially offering training in formwork, carpentry and masonry trades.
The Manapakkam and Panvel facilities together provide training to about 300candidates annually who are inducted after a process of selection, the minimum
qualification being tenth standard. Since inception, these two units have produced about
2,000 skilled workmen in various trades, with about sixty percent of them being
deployed to L&Ts jobsites spread across the country. The success of this training-
initiative demonstrates that adoption of systematic training techniques are bound to
yield efficient and skilled personnel in the shortest possible time, and in the power to
convert the potential of the Rural Youth in Construction and upgrading Rural Economy
in a small way.