+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: georgebarbu1877
View: 229 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 17

Transcript
  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    1/17

    IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    The English Court of Appeal in theLEHMANN TIMBER case

    Just another interesting court decision, orreason for cargo underwriters concerns?

    Prof. Dr. Dieter Schwampe

    Dabelstein & PassehlHamburg/Germany 1

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    2/17

    IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    LEHMAN TIMBER - the Facts

    Maiden voyage China / Europe

    Two consignments:

    Hatch covers for Germany 1.089 steel coils under 4 bills of lading for the same consignee in

    St. Petersburg / Russia

    Captured by Somali pirates 28 May 2012

    held hostage for 42 days

    After release main engine damage on way to Salalah as port of refuge

    General Average (GA) declared

    2

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    3/17

    IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    LEHMAN TIMBER - the Facts

    GA Securities (Bond and Guarantee) requested

    Hatch covers: Bond and Guarantee provided cargo discharged in Germany

    Steel coils:

    Guarantee provided for 98 coils under B/L No. 4No guarantees provided for remaining coils

    No bond provided for any coil

    Advice to shipowner: imminent risk of arrest in case of call at St. Petersburg

    Vessel diverts and arrives 28 September 2012 at Hamina / Finland

    3

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    4/17

    IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    LEHMAN TIMBER - the Facts

    October 2012: discharge of steel coils into warehouse under control ofship owners

    Monthly costs: USD 20.000

    Cargo interests do not pay

    Shipowner starts legal action in London

    7 June 2013: Cargo still at Hamina, when Court of Appeal renders decision

    Storage charges accrued: > USD 1,000,000

    4

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    5/17

    IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    The Court of Appeal: Leave St. Petersburg roads for Hamina?

    Issue relevant only for the 98 coils?

    Perfectly legitimate to leave

    Owner may demand a GA Bond even when holding a GA Guarantee

    If no Bond is provided, Owner may exercise his rights

    No need to run risks when exercising rights

    5

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    6/17

    IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    Legal Literature: Recover the Storage Fees?

    Lowndess & Rudolph:

    In the absence of a contractual provision to thecontrary the shipowner must enforce the lienat his own expense;

    If he were to land and store the goods, or deposit them

    with a wharfinger, the cost cannot be recoveredfrom the consignee

    6

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    7/17IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    Legal Literature: Recover the Storage Fees?

    Cooke/Kimball/Young a.o.

    Absent express agreement to the contraryit is a general rule that costs of retaining

    possession of goods in the exercise of a lienare not recoverable from their owner.

    7

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    8/17IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    The Court of Appeal: Recover Storage Costs?

    Perfectly legitimate: right of recovery

    No principle in common law that lienor must bearthe costs of exercise of the lien

    Only existing case law ( Somes v. Empire Shipping , 1858)relates to a special case and does not lay down a rule

    8

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    9/17IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    Consequences for the Cargo Insurer?

    Do not lose time to issue your Guarantee it may become expensive

    Recoverable costs are not only those of storage, but likely also loss of earnings

    Owner may exercise lien even with Guarantee of Cargo Underwriters in hands, ifno GA Bond has been issued

    The BIG Question: Does the Cargo Underwriter pay the shipowners costs toexercise the lien?

    9

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    10/17IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    Consequences for the Cargo Insurer?

    Wording of a usual GA Guarantee form:

    hereby guarantee to pay to the shipowners or to the Average Adjusters, ABC

    Average Adjusting Company, London, on behalf of the various parties to theadventure as their interests may appear, any contribution to General Averageand/or Salvage and/or Special Charges which may hereafter be ascertained to be

    properly and legally due in respect of the said goods.

    10

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    11/17IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    Consequences for the Cargo Insurer?

    hereby guarantee to pay to the shipowners or to the Average Adjusters, ABC

    Average Adjusting Company, London, on behalf of the various parties to theadventure as their interests may appear, any contribution to General Averageand/or Salvage and/or Special Charges which may hereafter be ascertained to be

    properly and legally due in respect of the said goods.

    11

    and/or Special Charges

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    12/17IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    Consequences for the Cargo Insurer?

    GA Adjusters start treating expenses for exercise of liens as special charges

    GA Guarantee binds cargo underwriter regardless of cover conditions

    If there is no cover for the costs: pay first and then run after your money

    12

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    13/17

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    14/17

    IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    Ways to avoid this?

    Issue your guarantee only once the Bond is placed? No

    Amend insurance conditions: provides only secondary rights

    Amend wording of GA guarantee

    hereby guarantee to pay to the shipowners or to the Average Adjusters, ABC Average Adjusting Company, London, on behalf of the various parties to theadventure as their interests may appear, any contribution to General Averageand/or Salvage and/or Special Charges , un less du e to de layed su bm iss ionof a Genera l Average Bo nd , which may hereafter be ascertained to be

    properly and legally due in respect of the said goods.14

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    15/17

    IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    Ways to avoid this?

    Issue your guarantee only once the Bond is placed? No

    Amend insurance conditions: provides only secondary rights

    Amend wording of GA guarantee

    Qualify your GA Guarantee

    please find attached our general average guarantee. It is submitted in theunderstanding and under condition that it shall not cover any costs incurred as aconsequence of a delayed submission of a General Average Bond

    15

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    16/17

    IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    Resum

    Owners may exercise lien if no GA Bond is placed

    Cargo Underwriters are liable under their GA Guarantees

    Amendment of insurance conditions do not really solve the problem

    Solution possible only in the context with the GA Guarantee but difficult

    16

  • 8/10/2019 Lehmann Timber Case Prof_Schwampe

    17/17

    IUMI Professional Partners since 2010

    Thank you for your attention

    Please feel free to direct questions or comments to

    Prof. Dr. Dieter [email protected]

    17


Recommended