Lepton Flavor Violation in Left-Right theory
Clara Murgui
IFIC, Universitat de Valencia-CSIC
References
This talk is based on:
• P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) no.5,051701 [arXiv:1607.00246 [hep-ph]],
• P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) no.7, 075010[arXiv:1701.06801 [hep-ph]].
Motivation
Left-Right symmetry
•
Left-Right symmetry
• Aesthetics
Left-Right symmetry
• Aesthetics
Left-Right symmetry
• Aesthetics
Left-Right symmetry
• Aesthetics
•
Left-Right symmetry
• Aesthetics
•
Left-Right symmetry
• Aesthetics
• Origin of P parity violation naturally explained
• mν 6= 0 as a natural output
[J. C. Pati and A. Salam, 1974],
[R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, 1975]
[G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra, 1975]
Left-Right symmetry
• Aesthetics
• Origin of P parity violation naturally explained
• mν 6= 0 as a natural output
[J. C. Pati and A. Salam, 1974],
[R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, 1975]
[G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra, 1975]
Left-Right symmetry
• Aesthetics
• Origin of P parity violation naturally explained
• mν 6= 0 as a natural output
[J. C. Pati and A. Salam, 1974],
[R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, 1975]
[G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra, 1975]
Aims
� Build the simplest LR theory with Majorana neutrinos.
� Study phenomenological implications of Lepton Flavor Violation in itscontext.
Aims
� Build the simplest LR theory with Majorana neutrinos.
� Study phenomenological implications of Lepton Flavor Violation in itscontext.
Introduction
Minimal content in LR modelsG. Senjanovic, Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 334.
• Gauge symmetry: SU(2)R ⊗ SU(2)L ⊗ U(1)B−L
• Matter content:
QL =
(uL
dL
)∼ (2, 1, 1/3) , QR =
(uR
dR
)∼ (1, 2, 1/3) ,
`L =
(νL
eL
)∼ (2, 1,−1) , `R =
(νR
eR
)∼ (1, 2,−1) .
• Scalar content: Φ =
(φ0
1 φ+2φ−1 φ0
2
)∼ (2, 2, 0),
−LY = QL(Y1Φ + Y2Φ̃)QR + `L(Y3Φ + Y4Φ̃)`R
Minimal content in LR modelsG. Senjanovic, Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 334.
• Gauge symmetry: SU(2)R ⊗ SU(2)L ⊗ U(1)B−L
• Matter content:
QL =
(uL
dL
)∼ (2, 1, 1/3) , QR =
(uR
dR
)∼ (1, 2, 1/3) ,
`L =
(νL
eL
)∼ (2, 1,−1) , `R =
(νR
eR
)∼ (1, 2,−1) .
• Scalar content: Φ =
(φ0
1 φ+2φ−1 φ0
2
)∼ (2, 2, 0),
−LY = QL(Y1Φ + Y2Φ̃)QR + `L(Y3Φ + Y4Φ̃)`R
Minimal content in LR modelsG. Senjanovic, Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979) 334.
• Gauge symmetry: SU(2)R ⊗ SU(2)L ⊗ U(1)B−L
• Matter content:
QL =
(uL
dL
)∼ (2, 1, 1/3) , QR =
(uR
dR
)∼ (1, 2, 1/3) ,
`L =
(νL
eL
)∼ (2, 1,−1) , `R =
(νR
eR
)∼ (1, 2,−1) .
• Scalar content: Φ =
(φ0
1 φ+2φ−1 φ0
2
)∼ (2, 2, 0),
−LY = QL(Y1Φ + Y2Φ̃)QR + `L(Y3Φ + Y4Φ̃)`R
Breaking spontaneously the symmetry
• Φ is not enough :(
Breaking spontaneously the symmetry
• Φ is not enough :(
Breaking spontaneously the symmetry
• Φ is not enough :(
Breaking spontaneously the symmetry
• Φ is not enough :(
Doublets HL and HR
[G. Senjanovic, 1978]
• Dirac neutrinos
Triplets ∆L and ∆R
[R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, 1975]
• Majorana neutrinos
Up for Majorana neutrinos
Simple Left Right model[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
• “Extra” content:
HL =
(H+
LH0
L
)∼ (1, 2, 1), HR =
(H+
RH0
R
)∼ (2, 1, 1) and δ+ ∼ (1, 1, 2)
• “Minimal” (d.o.f)
Scalar content d.o.f.
LR with triplets ∆L ∼ (1, 3, 2) 6∆R ∼ (3, 1, 2)
LR doublets + singletHL ∼ (1, 2, 1)
5HR ∼ (2, 1, 1)δ+ ∼ (1, 1, 2)
Simple Left Right model[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
• “Extra” content:
HL =
(H+
LH0
L
)∼ (1, 2, 1), HR =
(H+
RH0
R
)∼ (2, 1, 1) and δ+ ∼ (1, 1, 2)
• “Minimal” (d.o.f)
Scalar content d.o.f.
LR with triplets ∆L ∼ (1, 3, 2) 6∆R ∼ (3, 1, 2)
LR doublets + singletHL ∼ (1, 2, 1)
5HR ∼ (2, 1, 1)δ+ ∼ (1, 1, 2)
Simple Left Right model[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
• “Extra” content:
HL =
(H+
LH0
L
)∼ (1, 2, 1), HR =
(H+
RH0
R
)∼ (2, 1, 1) and δ+ ∼ (1, 1, 2)
• “Minimal” (d.o.f)
Scalar content d.o.f.
LR with triplets ∆L ∼ (1, 3, 2) 6∆R ∼ (3, 1, 2)
LR doublets + singletHL ∼ (1, 2, 1)
5HR ∼ (2, 1, 1)δ+ ∼ (1, 1, 2)
Simple Left Right model[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
• “Extra” content:
HL =
(H+
LH0
L
)∼ (1, 2, 1), HR =
(H+
RH0
R
)∼ (2, 1, 1) and δ+ ∼ (1, 1, 2)
• “Minimal” (d.o.f)
• BUT extra couplings:
Assumption: LR symmetry explicity broken→ λL 6= λR
Simple Left Right model[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
• “Extra” content:
HL =
(H+
LH0
L
)∼ (1, 2, 1), HR =
(H+
RH0
R
)∼ (2, 1, 1) and δ+ ∼ (1, 1, 2)
• “Minimal” (d.o.f)
• BUT extra couplings:
Assumption: LR symmetry explicity broken→ λL 6= λR
Simple LR: Neutrino masses
• −LY ⊃ QL(Y1Φ + Y2Φ̃)QR + `L(Y3Φ + Y4Φ̃)`R
• < Φ >=
(v1 00 v2
), Fermion masses
MU = Y1v1 + Y2v∗2MD = Y1v2 + Y2v∗1ME = Y3v2 + Y4v∗1MDν = Y3v1 + Y4v∗2
• In the limit Y3 � Y4 and v2 � v1, MDν is tiny
ME ≈ Y4v∗1
MDν = v1
(Y3 + ME
v∗2|v1|2
)
Simple LR: Neutrino masses
• −LY ⊃ QL(Y1Φ + Y2Φ̃)QR + `L(Y3Φ + Y4Φ̃)`R
• < Φ >=
(v1 00 v2
), Fermion masses
MU = Y1v1 + Y2v∗2MD = Y1v2 + Y2v∗1ME = Y3v2 + Y4v∗1MDν = Y3v1 + Y4v∗2
• In the limit Y3 � Y4 and v2 � v1, MDν is tiny
ME ≈ Y4v∗1
MDν = v1
(Y3 + ME
v∗2|v1|2
)
Simple LR: Neutrino masses[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
−L ⊃ λL`L`Lδ+ + λR`R`Rδ
+ + λ1HTL iσ2ΦHRδ
− + λ2HTL iσ2Φ̃HRδ
− + h.c.
νL/R νL/Re e
δ+
H0L H0
R
φ0i
φ+j
(MLν)
αγ=
14π2 λ
αβL meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)× V5i
[(Y†3 )
βγV∗2i − (Y†4 )βγV∗1i
]+ α↔ γ ,
(MRν)
αγ=
14π2 λ
αβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)× V5i
[(Y3)
βγV∗1i − (Y4)βγV∗2i
]+ α↔ γ .
Simple LR: Neutrino masses[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
−L ⊃ λL`L`Lδ+ + λR`R`Rδ
+ + λ1HTL iσ2ΦHRδ
− + λ2HTL iσ2Φ̃HRδ
− + h.c.
νL/R νL/Re e
δ+
H0L H0
R
φ0i
φ+j
(MLν)
αγ=
14π2 λ
αβL meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)× V5i
[(Y†3 )
βγV∗2i − (Y†4 )βγV∗1i
]+ α↔ γ ,
(MRν)
αγ=
14π2 λ
αβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)× V5i
[(Y3)
βγV∗1i − (Y4)βγV∗2i
]+ α↔ γ .
Simple LR: Neutrino masses[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
−L ⊃ λL`L`Lδ+ + λR`R`Rδ
+ + λ1HTL iσ2ΦHRδ
− + λ2HTL iσ2Φ̃HRδ
− + h.c.
νL/R νL/Re e
δ+
H0L H0
R
φ0i
φ+j
(MLν)
αγ=
14π2 λ
αβL meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)× V5i
[(Y†3 )
βγV∗2i − (Y†4 )βγV∗1i
]+ α↔ γ ,
(MRν)
αγ=
14π2 λ
αβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)× V5i
[(Y3)
βγV∗1i − (Y4)βγV∗2i
]+ α↔ γ .
Simple LR: Neutrino masses[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
−L ⊃ λL`L`Lδ+ + λR`R`Rδ
+ + λ1HTL iσ2ΦHRδ
− + λ2HTL iσ2Φ̃HRδ
− + h.c.
νL/R νL/Re e
δ+
H0L H0
R
φ0i
φ+j
(MLν)
αγ=
14π2 λ
αβL meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)× V5i
[(Y†3 )
βγV∗2i − (Y†4 )βγV∗1i
]+ α↔ γ ,
(MRν)
αγ=
14π2 λ
αβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)× V5i
[(Y3)
βγV∗1i − (Y4)βγV∗2i
]+ α↔ γ .
Simple LR: Low scale see-saw[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
(νL (νR)c
)(MLν mD
ν
mDν MR
ν
)(νL
(νR)c
)
Mαγν ' − [(mD
ν )αγ ]2
(MRν )αγ
MαγN ' (MR
ν )αγ
=1
4π2λαβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)V5i
[Yβγ3 V∗1i −
meβδβγ
v∗1V∗2i
]+ α↔ γ
Simple LR: Low scale see-saw[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
(νL (νR)c
)(MLν mD
ν
mDν MR
ν
)(νL
(νR)c
)
Mαγν ' − [(mD
ν )αγ ]2
(MRν )αγ
MαγN ' (MR
ν )αγ
=1
4π2λαβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)V5i
[Yβγ3 V∗1i −
meβδβγ
v∗1V∗2i
]+ α↔ γ
Simple LR: Low scale see-saw[P. Fileviez Perez, C. Murgui and S. Ohmer, arXiv:1607.00246]
(νL (νR)c
)(MLν mD
ν
mDν MR
ν
)(νL
(νR)c
)
Mαγν ' − [(mD
ν )αγ ]2
(MRν )αγ
MαγN ' (MR
ν )αγ
=1
4π2λαβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)V5i
[Yβγ3 V∗1i −
meβδβγ
v∗1V∗2i
]+ α↔ γ
Simple LR: Neutrino hierarchy
[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
MαγN ' 1
4π2λαβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)V5i
[Yβγ3 V∗1i −
meβδβγ
v∗1V∗2i
]+ α↔ γ
Limit v2 � v1 and Y3 � Y4, (MN)αβ ≈ ∆
4π2v∗1λαβR (m2
eα − m2eβ )
Simple LR: Neutrino hierarchy
[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
MαγN ' 1
4π2λαβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)V5i
[Yβγ3 V∗1i −
meβδβγ
v∗1V∗2i
]+ α↔ γ
Limit v2 � v1 and Y3 � Y4,
(MN)αβ ≈ ∆
4π2v∗1λαβR (m2
eα − m2eβ )
Simple LR: Neutrino hierarchy
[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
MαγN ' 1
4π2λαβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)V5i
[Yβγ3 V∗1i −
meβδβγ
v∗1V∗2i
]+ α↔ γ
Limit v2 � v1 and Y3 � Y4, (MN)αβ ≈ ∆
4π2v∗1λαβR (m2
eα − m2eβ )
Simple LR: Neutrino hierarchy
[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
MαγN ' 1
4π2λαβR meβ
∑i
Log
(M2
hi
m2eβ
)V5i
[Yβγ3 V∗1i −
meβδβγ
v∗1V∗2i
]+ α↔ γ
Limit v2 � v1 and Y3 � Y4, (MN)αβ ≈ ∆
4π2v∗1λαβR (m2
eα − m2eβ )
So far...
X� Build new theory,
• with usual properties of a LR theory,• with simplest higgs sector to generate Majorana neutrinos,• which predicts light sterile neutrinos.
� Study phenomenological implications of Lepton Flavor Violation in itscontext.
So far...
X� Build new theory,
• with usual properties of a LR theory,
• with simplest higgs sector to generate Majorana neutrinos,• which predicts light sterile neutrinos.
� Study phenomenological implications of Lepton Flavor Violation in itscontext.
So far...
X� Build new theory,
• with usual properties of a LR theory,• with simplest higgs sector to generate Majorana neutrinos,
• which predicts light sterile neutrinos.
� Study phenomenological implications of Lepton Flavor Violation in itscontext.
So far...
X� Build new theory,
• with usual properties of a LR theory,• with simplest higgs sector to generate Majorana neutrinos,• which predicts light sterile neutrinos.
� Study phenomenological implications of Lepton Flavor Violation in itscontext.
So far...
X� Build new theory,
• with usual properties of a LR theory,• with simplest higgs sector to generate Majorana neutrinos,• which predicts light sterile neutrinos.
� Study phenomenological implications of Lepton Flavor Violation in itscontext.
Lepton Flavor Violation
Current Status CLFV
LFV process Current limit Projected limitµ→ eγ 4,2× 10−13 MEG, 2016 6× 10−14 MEG-IIτ → eγ 3,3× 10−8 BaBar, 2010 3× 10−9 Super KEKBτ → µγ 4,4× 10−8 BaBar, 2010 ∼ 10−9 Super KEKBµ→ eee 1× 10−12 SINDRUM, 1988 ∼ 10−16 Mu3e
µAl→ eAl ∼ 10−16 COMET6× 10−17 Mu2e
µTi→ eTi 4,3× 10−12 SINDRUM II, 1993 ?µAu→ eAu 7× 10−13 SINDRUM II, 2006µPb→ ePb 4,6× 10−11 SINDRUM II, 1996
Current Status CLFV
LFV in simple LR: µ→ eγ[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
• `i → `jγ:
µ νi/Ni e
γW+
R/Lγ
µ νi/Ni e
δ+j
(a) (b)
LFV in simple LR: µ→ eγ
[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
AWRL ≈ g2
Re mµ
64π2M2WR
∑i
(VN)ei(V∗N)µiF
(m2
Ni
m2WR
),
AWLR ≈ g2
Le mµ
64π2M2WL
∑i
(Vν)ei(V∗ν )µiF
(m2νi
m2WL
),
F(x) =1
6(1− x)4
(10− 43 x + 78 x2 − 49 x3 + 18 x3 Log(x) + 4 x4) ,
F(x)x→∞ ∼23
+3Log(x)
x, F(x)x→0 ∼
53−1
2x, F(x)x→1 ∼
1712
+3
20(1−x).
LFV in simple LR: µ→ eγ
[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
AWRL ≈ g2
Re mµ
64π2M2WR
∑i
(VN)ei(V∗N)µiF
(m2
Ni
m2WR
),
AWLR ≈ g2
Le mµ
64π2M2WL
∑i
(Vν)ei(V∗ν )µiF
(m2νi
m2WL
),
F(x) =1
6(1− x)4
(10− 43 x + 78 x2 − 49 x3 + 18 x3 Log(x) + 4 x4) ,
F(x)x→∞ ∼23
+3Log(x)
x,
F(x)x→0 ∼53−1
2x, F(x)x→1 ∼
1712
+3
20(1−x).
LFV in simple LR: µ→ eγ
[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
AWRL ≈ g2
Re mµ
64π2M2WR
∑i
(VN)ei(V∗N)µiF
(m2
Ni
m2WR
),
AWLR ≈ g2
Le mµ
64π2M2WL
∑i
(Vν)ei(V∗ν )µiF
(m2νi
m2WL
),
F(x) =1
6(1− x)4
(10− 43 x + 78 x2 − 49 x3 + 18 x3 Log(x) + 4 x4) ,
F(x)x→∞ ∼23
+3Log(x)
x, F(x)x→0 ∼
53−1
2x,
F(x)x→1 ∼1712
+3
20(1−x).
LFV in simple LR: µ→ eγ
[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
AWRL ≈ g2
Re mµ
64π2M2WR
∑i
(VN)ei(V∗N)µiF
(m2
Ni
m2WR
),
AWLR ≈ g2
Le mµ
64π2M2WL
∑i
(Vν)ei(V∗ν )µiF
(m2νi
m2WL
),
F(x) =1
6(1− x)4
(10− 43 x + 78 x2 − 49 x3 + 18 x3 Log(x) + 4 x4) ,
F(x)x→∞ ∼23
+3Log(x)
x, F(x)x→0 ∼
53−1
2x, F(x)x→1 ∼
1712
+3
20(1−x).
LFV in simple LR: µ→ eγ[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
Limit AWRL
mNi � MWR −g2R
e128π2
mµ
M4WR
∑i(VN)ei(V∗N)µim2
Ni
mNi � MWR g2Rmµ
3e64π2
∑i Log
(m2
NiM2
WR
)(VN)ie(V∗N)iµ
1m2
Ni
mNi ∼ MWR g2R
31280π2
mµ
M2WR
∑i(VN)ei(V∗N)µi
M2WR−m2
NiM2
WR
LFV in simple LR: µ→ eγ
[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
• `i → `jγ:
Aδ+
L =e
4π2
mµm2δ+
∑i
∑c,d
(λ∗R)ceλdµR Vci
N (V∗N)di G
(m2
Ni
m2δ+
)
G(x) =1− 6x + 3x2 + 2x3 − 6x2Log(x)
12(1− x)4
LFV in simple LR: µ→ eγ
[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
• `i → `jγ:
Aδ+
L =e
4π2
mµm2δ+
∑i
∑c,d
(λ∗R)ceλdµR Vci
N (V∗N)di G
(m2
Ni
m2δ+
)
G(x) =1− 6x + 3x2 + 2x3 − 6x2Log(x)
12(1− x)4
LFV in simple LR: µ→ eγ[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
• `i → `jγ:
Aδ+
L =e
4π2
mµm2δ+
∑i
∑c,d
(λ∗R)ceλdµR Vci
N (V∗N)di G
(m2
Ni
m2δ+
)(1)
Simple LR: LFV predictions[P. Fileviez Perez and C. Murgui, arXiv:1701.06801]
• µ→ e conversion:
Mu2e, COMET
DeeMe
Ti
0.2 0.5 1 2
10-20
10-17
10-14
10-11
10-8
Mδ+ (TeV)
BR(μ
→e)
Au
0.2 0.5 1 2
10-26
10-22
10-18
10-14
10-10
Mδ+ (TeV)
BR(μ
→e)
Pb
0.2 0.5 1 2
10-23
10-19
10-15
10-11
Mδ+ (TeV)
BR(μ
→e)
DeeMe
Mu2e, COMET
Al
0.2 0.5 1 2
10-20
10-17
10-14
10-11
10-8
Mδ+ (TeV)
BR(μ
→e)
Conclusions
• New left-right model with the simplest scalar sector to generateMajorana neutrinos.
• The model predics light right-handed neutrinos with a peculiarhierarchy.
• Predictions for lepton flavor violating processes testable in the currentand new generation of experiments.
Conclusions
• New left-right model with the simplest scalar sector to generateMajorana neutrinos.
• The model predics light right-handed neutrinos with a peculiarhierarchy.
• Predictions for lepton flavor violating processes testable in the currentand new generation of experiments.
Conclusions
• New left-right model with the simplest scalar sector to generateMajorana neutrinos.
• The model predics light right-handed neutrinos with a peculiarhierarchy.
• Predictions for lepton flavor violating processes testable in the currentand new generation of experiments.
Thanks for your attention!