Date post: | 01-Nov-2014 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | matthew-leingang |
View: | 4,697 times |
Download: | 0 times |
. . . . . .
Section 13.7Stokes’s Theorem
Math 21a
April 28, 2008
.
.Image: Flickr user Al Giordino
. . . . . .
Announcements
◮ Final Exam: 5/23 9:15 am (tentative)◮ Office hours Tuesday, Wednesday 2–4pm SC 323◮ Problem Sessions: Mon, 8:30; Thur, 7:30; SC 103b
. . . . . .
Outline
Last Time: Surface and Flux integrals
Stokes’s TheoremStatementProof
Worksheet
Next Time: The Divergence Theorem
. . . . . .
Surface integrals and flux integrals
Let r : D → S be a parametrized surface and f a function on S.◮ If f is a function on S, we define∫∫
S
f dS =
∫∫D
f(r(u, v)) |ru × rv| dA
◮ If F is a vector field on S, we defined∫∫S
F · dS =
∫∫S
F · n dS =
∫∫D
F · (ru × rv) dA
. . . . . .
Outline
Last Time: Surface and Flux integrals
Stokes’s TheoremStatementProof
Worksheet
Next Time: The Divergence Theorem
. . . . . .
Theorem (Green’s Theorem)Let D be a piecewise-smooth surface abounded by a simple, closed,piecewise-smooth curve C with positive orientation. If P and Q havecontinuous partial derivatives on an open region that contains D, then∫
C
(P dx + Q dy) =
∫∫D
(∂Q∂x
− ∂P∂y
)dA
or ∫C
F · dr =
∫∫D
dF dA
. . . . . .
Theorem (Stokes’s Theorem)Let S be an oriented piecewise-smooth surface that is bounded by a simple,closed, piecewise-smooth boundary curve C with positive orientation. Let Fbe a vector field whose components have continuous partial derivatives onan open region in R3 that contains S. Then∫
C
F · dr =
∫∫S
curlF · dS
. . . . . .
Proof (one case)
Proof.Assume S is the graph of a function g with domain D, where theboundary curve C1 of D is mapped to C. Then you can apply Green’sTheorem.
. . . . . .
Outline
Last Time: Surface and Flux integrals
Stokes’s TheoremStatementProof
Worksheet
Next Time: The Divergence Theorem
. . . . . .
Example (Worksheet Problem 1)Let S is the hemisphere x2 + y2 + z2 = 4 with z ≥ 0 and P be theparaboloid z = x2 + y2 − 4 both oriented upwards. Suppose that F isa vector field defined on R3 with continuous partial derivatives.Explain why ∫∫
S
curlF · dS =
∫∫P
curlF · dS.
SolutionBoth of these are equal to the line integral of F around their respectiveboundaries, which in this case are the same curve.
. . . . . .
Example (Worksheet Problem 1)Let S is the hemisphere x2 + y2 + z2 = 4 with z ≥ 0 and P be theparaboloid z = x2 + y2 − 4 both oriented upwards. Suppose that F isa vector field defined on R3 with continuous partial derivatives.Explain why ∫∫
S
curlF · dS =
∫∫P
curlF · dS.
SolutionBoth of these are equal to the line integral of F around their respectiveboundaries, which in this case are the same curve.
. . . . . .
Example (Worksheet Problem 2)
Use Stokes’s Theorem to evaluate∫∫
S
curlF · dS, where
F = x2eyz i+ y2exz j+ z2exyj
and S is the hemisphere x2 + y2 + z2 = 4 with z ≥ 0 orientedupwards.
SolutionWe integrate
∫CF · dr around the boundary curve x2 + y2 = 4. After
parametrization we have
I = 8∫ 2π
0(cos(t) sin2(t) − sin(t) cos2(t)) dt = 0.
. . . . . .
Example (Worksheet Problem 2)
Use Stokes’s Theorem to evaluate∫∫
S
curlF · dS, where
F = x2eyz i+ y2exz j+ z2exyj
and S is the hemisphere x2 + y2 + z2 = 4 with z ≥ 0 orientedupwards.
SolutionWe integrate
∫CF · dr around the boundary curve x2 + y2 = 4. After
parametrization we have
I = 8∫ 2π
0(cos(t) sin2(t) − sin(t) cos2(t)) dt = 0.
. . . . . .
Example (Worksheet Problem 3)
Use Stokes’s Theorem to evaluate∫∫
S
curlF · dS, where
F = (x + y2) i+ (y + z2) j+ (z + x2)j
and C is the triangle with vertices (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), and (0, 0, 1)oriented in counterclockwise direction when viewed from above.
SolutionThe answer is 3.
. . . . . .
Example (Worksheet Problem 3)
Use Stokes’s Theorem to evaluate∫∫
S
curlF · dS, where
F = (x + y2) i+ (y + z2) j+ (z + x2)j
and C is the triangle with vertices (1, 0, 0), (0, 1, 0), and (0, 0, 1)oriented in counterclockwise direction when viewed from above.
SolutionThe answer is 3.
. . . . . .
Outline
Last Time: Surface and Flux integrals
Stokes’s TheoremStatementProof
Worksheet
Next Time: The Divergence Theorem