Letter to Duncan Lewis Director ASIO 1

8/18/2019 Letter to Duncan Lewis Director ASIO 1

1/20


2/20

2

Who Is “Factor X” You Ask?

Right! I will try and explain during the Bush / Cheney Cabalrein of Government there in the USA – America allot ofSenior Military and Intelligence people were either sackedor left because they refused to go along with their plans

“Project For The New American Century” also the “CleanBreak Plan” both of which have now mortified into “TheGreater Israel Plan”

Of what America is fighting for under cover of “TheFraudulent War On Terror” and now “The Truth About ISIS– ISIL Plan” of what their final objectives, goals, plans are.

Factor X was made up of current or ex US Military, CIA,NSA, FBI people and their aims and objectives were to tryand reverse things about and the course America wasfollowing down the river which would destroy the whole

American system.

There numbers of members were around about 139 peoplefrom reports, but by 2008 – 2009 most had left the USA forSouth American countries to live, with the plan to return tothe USA if things could be turned about, but the ZionistJewish International Bankers and Corporations controleverything in America, The Media, WALL Street Banks, BigPhama, The Security and Military Industrial Complex andthe Federal Reserve Bank, World Bank, and IMF, also theInternational Bank of Settlements all controlled by theZionist.


3/20

3

A few remained behind refused to go, and from time totime they show all of us in the know they are alive and stillwell by doing things like leaking emails, letters etc andgetting people behind the scenes to write things in

politicians TV speeches which are read by teleprompter

For example when Obama last year gave an address to the American Public flanked by Generals Obama admitted, theUSA is funding ISIS, people around the World fell of theirchairs laughing, this is one of Factor X boys work to getwriters to put in a Gaffle like that to be said.

Mid to Late 2012 the US Pentagon formed a “SpecialInvestigation Team” in which they would flash out any

“Factor X” people from the Pentagon they failed of course,so Col Jughead, flanked at his right and left side by Butch,Butch and Butch would flash these traitors out.

They went around in good old Uncle Sam style questioningand asking people are you Factor X? Are you? What aboutyou there? Are you Factor X?

Poor Col Jughead and Butch, Butch and Butch they couldfind nobody admitting to belong to a group called Factor X,this is a true story, I still get a laugh out of it when I think

about it, somebody I was talking to in a Chat Room backthen told me and the Room about it from somebody whowas high up in the Pentagon, we all sat there laughing ourheads off.

Anyway that is Who Factor X boys were.


4/20

4

2.) The Brussels Terror Attacks Fake Videos and Images. “The Man in the Hat”

Please enjoy reading about the following, it was a False

Flag Terrorist Attack and the writer of this spills the beansabout it, How do we know it was a False Flag Attack?

Please see within: -

The SOURCE OF THIS VIDEO released by Dh.be at 9.07amdid not emanate from the CCTV cameras of Brussels

airport (22/03/216), (DH. be logo pasted on the Moscow2011 footage), it was a rerun of a 2011 bomb attack atMoscow international airport.

Sloppy work, very sloppy work it took researchers andinvestigators a matter of hours to debunk this whole attackafter the Officials tried to pull the wool over peoples eyes

with releasing Fake Video Footage.

Anyway I am sending you these two things to keep you inthe loop and know what is happening in and around theWorld.

Yours truly

Lloyd T VanceXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX


5/20

5

Hacked Email from U.S. Army Attache in Ukraine –For False Flags to occur so U.S. can take militaryaction against Russia

A CNBC story jogged my memory about hacked emails from Marchof this year.

The emails were from a Jason Gresh (U.S. attache at KievEmbassy) to an Igor Protsyk, General in the Ukraine Military.

The emails are real.

The CNBC story is about Russia and their ‘propaganda’ machine

saying the CIA was behind the downing of MH17.Here are all the details:

Correspondence of US Army Attaché Assistant Jason Gresh inKiev

Extracts of the e-mail from US military attaché (a Soft Title for aCIA operative) to –

COL Igor PROTSYK Chief, Bilateral Military Cooperation Division Main Directorate for Military Cooperation and PKO General Staff, Armed Forces of Ukraine tel +38044 481-5407 cell +38067 407 97 40 e-mail: [email protected]


6/20

6

e-mail: [email protected]

From: “Gresh, Jason P”To: [email protected], [email protected] Subj: Peninsula Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 17:57:09 +0200

Ihor,

Events are moving rapidly in Crimea.

Our friends in Washington expect more decisive actions fromyour network.

I think it’s time to implement the plan we discussed lately.

Your job is to cause some problems to the transport hubs inthe southeast in order to frame-up the neighbour.

It will create favourable conditions for Pentagon and the

Company to act.

Do not waste time, my friend.

Respectfully, JP

Jason P. Gresh

Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Assistant Army Attaché U.S. Embassy, Kyiv Tankova 4, Kyiv, Ukraine 04112 (380-44) 521 – 5444 | Fax (380-44) 521 – 5636


7/20

7

The Brussels Terror Attacks Fake Videosand Images. “The Man in the Hat”

After a month of exhaustive police investigations, theBelgian authorities have identified and arrested the alleged(surviving) terror mastermind of the airport bombing, the

“man in the hat” Mohamed Abrini.

The other four alleged terrorists involved in the kamikazebombing attacks at the airport and the metro station arereported dead.

According to reports, Abrini was identified on a Brusselsairport still photo released by one or more airport videosecurity surveillance CCTV cameras.

This photo –which identifies three of the terror suspects–has become a central piece of evidence in the policeinvestigation.

In this still photo, the mystery “man in the hat” allegedlyMohamed Abrini is seen accompanying the two allegedsuicide bombers, who according to reports blew themselvesup in Brussels airport.


8/20

8

\

Moreover, Abrini happens to be, according to French policeinvestigators, the main surviving suspect of the ParisNovember attacks.

The official story is that the attacks in both Paris andBrussels were ordered by the ISIS, which just so happensto be supported by Turkey and Saudi Arabia in close liaisonwith Washington and NATO headquarters in Brussels. (Theissue of US-NATO-Israel support of the Islamic State isamply documented).

According to media reports: The revelation that a Parisattacks suspect escorted two of the Brussels bombers totheir deaths at the city’s airport is the strongest sign yetthat the Islamic State attackers who brought mayhem toboth European cities — killing a total of 162 people — wereintimately linked. (See Guardian April 9, 2016)


9/20

9

Abrini is said to have confessed “his presence at the crimescene,” according to the official communique

The Authenticity of the Still Photo of the Three alleged

Terrorists at Brussels AirportOur analysis below will largely focus on the authenticity ofthe still photo allegedly from the Brussels airport CCTVsurveillance cameras.

CCTV systems are able to to take high resolution images ona time lapse basis.

The still picture could also have taken by closed-circuitdigital photography (CCDP), which is used to generatestill digital images.

TIMELINE

To address this issue, it is important to recall the timeline:

7:55 am local time: “Surveillance footage shows threesuspected attackers exiting a taxi and pushing luggagetrolleys through Brussels Airport. Surveillance capturedimages of the three suspects.” (See image below)

Three minutes later, it sounds absurd.

The kamikaze bombers blow themselves up. Abrini is said to have left the airport between 7.55am and7.57am. before the blast occurred at 7.58am

7:58 am. Gunfire is reported in the departures terminalfollowed by an explosion.


10/20

10

There were two blasts: a second blast erupts 10 secondslater.

8.20 am: The airport is closed. all roads and railway to the

airport are closed.9.07 am, DH.be (Dernière Heure), one of Belgium’s largestprint and online media released an exclusive video footageof the bomb attack recorded by the CCTV surveillancecameras of the airport.

This video was aired on all major TV networks, the images

went round the World.

The SOURCE OF THIS VIDEO released by Dh.be at 9.07amdid not emanate from the CCTV cameras of Brusselsairport [22/03/216, DH. be logo pasted on the Moscow2011 footage], it was a rerun of a 2011 bomb attack atMoscow international airport. (see image below)

Below is the screenshot of DH’s video release.


11/20

11

Moscow airport attacks (January 2011) Video 1 scan(Moscow airport, January 2011)

9:10 am: A blast is reported on a train at the Maalbeek

metro subway station, near the headquarters of theEuropean Commission.

The video broadcast of the Maalbeek metro explosion wasnot from the CCTV cameras. It was from the Minsk, Belarusmetro bomb blast in April 2011.

(see photo scans at the foot of this article)

What we can conclude is that:

1) Dernière Heure broadcast a video of the Moscowairport bomb attack instead of the Brussels blast(recorded by CCTV camera) airport attack.


12/20

12

Was it sloppy journalism or something else? This is amatter for the police to investigate. (The broadcast of thevideo footage of the Minsk metro attack was equallymisleading).

2) The official CCTV airport security video was not availableto Dernière Heure at 9.07am and the public was misled bythe release of the Moscow video.

One would therefore assume that if the CCTV video footageof the blast had been available to Dernière Heure, theywould have broadcast it instead of the Moscow footage.

3) Assuming that the airport CCTV video footage was notavailable to Dernière Heure at 9.07am, how come theywere able to get their hands on still images from the CCTVvideo surveillance system showing the three allegedterrorists.

10.25am, less than an hour and a half following the releaseof the fake CCTV surveillance video of the bomb attack (i.e.Moscow) by Dernière Heure, a still image is released byDernière Heure of the three alleged suspects walking withtrolleys in the airport at 7.55am, three minutes before thefirst blast in the departure terminal.

The image allegedly from an airport CCTV surveillance

camera in the departure terminal was released by DH.be at10.25am, it was tagged EXCLUSIVE, No other media hadearly access to this alleged airport CCTV video.


13/20

13

The still images were presented with some confusion asphotographic evidence pertaining to the identity of theterror suspects.

Most media reports acknowledged that the mysteriousphoto of the alleged suicide bombers was released by theBrussels police rather than DH.be.

The twitter entries below confirm the exact time at whichthe airport photos were released:

First Release by DH.be at 10.27am (entitled “Photo

Exclusive” by DH.be)

12.58pm, is the time at which the still image is “officially”released by the police in liaison with the office of theprosecutor. (procureur)


14/20

14

Release by Politie Brussel/Police de Bruxelles: 12.58pm

In an unusual twist, it would appear that Dernière Heurehad access to the alleged CCTV still images from thesurveillance cameras BEFORE the police.


15/20

15

The media reported that the photo was from federal policesources:

DH.be released the still image of the three allegedterrorists at 10.25am, two and a half hours before itsofficial release by Brussels police at 12.58pm, whichsuggests that the exclusive image published by DernièreHeure DID NOT emanate from the police authorities.

There is always the possibility that a police and/or airportsurveillance personnel made these still images available toDernière Heure prior to their official release by Brusselspolice at 12.58pm.

It is also possible that the still images were taken by aCCTV camera which was live streaming and that this video

livestream was accessible to the public.The third possibility is that Brussels police took cognizanceof the photograph which Dernière Heure described as a stillimage from the CCTV airport surveillance system anddecided to release it without verifying its original source.

On April 7, new video footage showing the man in the hat

leaving the airport, circa 7.56am-7.57am was made public

Now let us recap:

DH.be released both the Moscow 2011 video of the bombattack at 9.07am (instead of the Brussels airport CCTVfootage) as well as the still image allegedly from the same


16/20

16

CCTV airport source (in the departure terminal) of the threeterrorists at 10.25am.

Did DH.be have access to the security CCTV cameras?

At 9.07am, they did not have access to the CCTV videofootage.

They presented Moscow footage (in lieu of Brusselsfootage) at 9.07am under the byline: “video de surveillancea l’aeroport”.

They then claimed that the still image released at 10.25amwas from the same source, namely the CCTV camerasystem at Brussels airport, departure terminal.

Let us play the devil’s advocate: If DH.be had been inpossession of the real surveillance video footage at 9.07am,why on earth would they have released the Moscow airportfootage and then one and a half hours later come up with

an allegedly authentic image from the CCTV airportcameras.

There is another important caveat. While police andsurveillance authorities would be able to view and analysealmost immediately the camera footage of the bombexplosion, the same does not apply to the process of

identifying three passengers with trolleys mingling amongstseveral hundred airline passengers also with trolleys in thedeparture terminal.

In other words, to identify three individuals from a largenumber of airport CCTV cameras with hundreds ofpassengers travelling early morning would not have been


17/20

17

an easy fast-track undertaking: the still images pertainingto hundreds of passengers would have had to be examined,compared to police photographic records, etc: An almostimpossible task to achieve in a matter of two hours after

the blast, assuming that Dernière Heure had access to theCCTV surveillance video data. Normally, journalists wouldnot have had access to the CCTV camera footage prior tothe police authorities.

Moreover, the airport was immediately evacuated andclosed down at 8.20am, twenty-two minutes after the blast.

A state of chaos prevailed. And we are led to believe thatthe journalists of Dernière Heure managed in collaborationwith CCTV camera surveillance personnel and/or police toget hold of the still image of three alleged terrorists, whichthey released at 10.25am, prior to the conduct of a policeinvestigation and less than two and half hours followingthe 7.58am bomb blast.

Video 2 scan (Minsk Metro, April 2011)

Here is a screenshot of the Minsk 2011 video footagebroadcast on Belgian network TV and on the internetdepicting the explosion in the Metro in Brussels, March 22,2016


18/20

18

Now Compare the above to the screenshot of the Minsk April 2011 attacks.

These are the questions for police investigators.


19/20

19

1. Why did Dernière Heure deliberately broadcast at9.07am the video footage of the January 2011 Moscowairport terror attack?

Why did the media broadcast the video footage of a Minsk,Belarus metro terror attack in 2011 in lieu of thesurveillance video of the metro.

In other words both the metro and airport videos were “fake”.

2. Did Dernière Heure interface with Belgian police and

intelligence prior to releasing the Moscow airport videowhich was broadcast Worldwide?

3. Who authorized the release of this fake video?

4. What are the legal implications of this negligence on thepart of Derniere Heure?

5. Where did Derniere Heure get the still image from whichthey released as an EXCLUSIVE at 10.25am prior to theconduct of a police investigation?

6. Was there evidence of them having access to the CCTVcameras? Did the CCTV airport surveillance personnelprovide Dernière Heure with access to CCTV footage?

Assuming they did, how on earth did the Derniere Heure journalists manage to single out a still image of threepassengers, establish and corroborate their identity in theabsence of a police investigation.


20/20

20

7. Did the police corroborate the identity of these threeindividuals prior to 10.25am and communicate the resultsof their investigation to Dernière Heure?

Highly unlikely: lest we forget, the police released the stillimage at 12.58am, two and a half hours later. By that time,the EXCLUSIVE picture by Derniere Heure had been pickedup by the news chain, it had circled the globe prior to itsofficial release by the Brussels police.

Concluding Remarks

People in Belgium who are living the dramatic aftermath ofthis national catastrophe and loss of life: Draw your ownconclusions. Is your government telling the truth?

The Belgian police, by addressing these seven questions,should be in a position to establish the authenticity and thesource of the still pictures of the three men at the airport.Will they undertake this task?

Date post:	06-Jul-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	lloyd-t-vance
View:	216 times
Download:	0 times

Letter to Duncan Lewis Director ASIO 1

Documents