of 32
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
1/32
Leverage Buyouts
Introduction
A leverage buyout (LBO) is the acquisition of a business, typically a mature company,by a financial investor.
The term Leveraged signifies a noteworthy use of debt for financing the transaction.
The purpose of a LBO is to allow an acquirer to make large acquisitions without having to
commit a significant amount of capital. A typical
transaction involves the setup of an acquisition
vehicle that is jointly funded by a financial investor
and management of the target company. Often the
assets of the target company are used as collateral for
the debt. Typically, the debt capital comprises of a
combination of highly structured debt instruments
including repayable bank facilities and / or publicly
or private placed bonds commonly referred to as
high-yield debt.
The term Buyout suggests the gain of control of a
majority of the target companys equity. The target company goes private after a LBO. It is
owned by a partnership of private investors who monitor performance and can act right away if
something goes awry. Again, the private ownership is not intended to be permanent. The most
successful LBOs go public again as soon as debt has been paid down sufficiently and
improvements in operating performance have been demonstrated by the target company.
What Does Leveraged Buyout -
LBOMean?
The acquisition of another company
using a significant amount of borrowed
money (bonds or loans) to meet thecost of acquisition. Often, the assets of
the company being acquired are used
as collateral for the loans in addition to
the assets of the acquiring company.
The purpose of leveraged buyouts is to
allow companies to make large
acquisitions without having to commit a
lot of capital.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
2/32
History of LBO
During the 1980s, leveraged buyouts (LBOs) worked like a machine gun firing bullets of junk bonds,
hitting one company after another on Wall Street. At one time, it looked as if the whole world would
soon become a playground for LBOs. But the collapse of junk bonds in the late 1980s silenced the
machine guns.
It took some years before the second wave of LBOs started hitting the shores of the financial market.
With the growth of private equity players in the mid-2000s, the US and the rest of the world saw the
second boom in LBOs. But now, with the onset of the credit crisis in 2008, it seems LBOs may have to
rediscover themselves.
However, while it is unclear when the first leveraged buyout was carried out, it is generally
agreed that the first early leveraged buyouts were carried out in the years following World WarII.
Prior to the 1980s, the leveraged buyout (previously known as a bootstrap acquisition) was for
years little more than an obscure financing technique.
In the years following the end of World War II the Great Depression was still relatively fresh in
the minds of Americas corporate leaders, who considered it wise to keep corporate debt ratioslow. As a result, for the first three decades following World War II, very few American
companies relied on debt as a significant source of funding. At the same time, American business
became caught up in a wave of conglomerate building that began in the early 1960s.
Executives filled boards of directors with subordinates and friendly outsiders4 and engaged in
rampant empire building. The ranks of middle management swelled and corporate profitability
began to slide. It was in this environment that the modern LBO was born.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
3/32
An easy way out for explaining the what, who & where of LBOs through a
dramatic conversation b/w Jinny n Johnny.
Johnny: All of us at some point in our life rediscover something. I hope LBOs also maintain that
spirit. But tell me, Jinny, how did LBOs start?
Jinny: Leveraged buyouts, or what you call LBOs in short, first emerged during the 1980s in the
US, Canada and to some extent, the UK. TheJournal of Economic Perspectives (Volume 23, No.
1) in one of its studies mentions that during 1985-89, when the process of LBOs was at its peak,
these three countries accounted for 93% of the worldwide transaction value. The frantic growth
in mergers and acquisitions on Wall Street during the 1980s fuelled LBO growth. At one point, it
was thought LBOs would change the face of corporate finance forever. But during the 1990s,
things didnt turn out as expected; LBOs of public companies took a back seat.
Johnny: I am really curious to know why. But before that, it would be better if you could first
explain how the process of LBOs actually works.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
4/32
Jinny:The process of LBOs during the 1980s was most commonly used for converting a publicly
listed company into a private company by buying back the shares from shareholders. The beauty
of this process was that it appealed to both saints and sinners of high finance. While the
management of a company or some friendly investment firm used the process to unlock the true
potential of a company, corporate raiders used it as a deadly weapon in a hostile takeover. LBOs
work perfectly well for all sorts of corporate acquirers. The process of LBOs, in its most basic
form, involves the acquisition of a company by using a small portion of equity and a large
portion of outside debt financing.
Johnny: So thats the secret formula: a small portion of equity and a large portion of debt. Thats
why I think the whole process is called leveraged buyout.
Jinny: Thats right. A typical LBO is financed with 60-90% debt. The acquirer himself has to
put less of his own money in the acquisition. For instance, suppose you intend to convert a
publicly listed company into a private company by buying shares from the existing shareholders.
If the value of all the shares is currently Rs100 crore, you may just need to use Rs10 crore of
your own for acquiring equity worth that much in the company. To raise the rest of the money
for the buy-back, acquirers issue bonds to other institutional investors. At one point, LBOs of big
companies with a thin layer of equity mostly relied on junk bonds to raise the required money for
the buy-back. The junk bonds used to finance LBOs offered high returns to investors, albeit at a
greater risk due to high leverage.
Johnny: Like a late night party, LBOs attract all sorts of characters, it seems.
Jinny: In any LBO you would find two classes of investors. One, the actual acquirers who invest
some portion of their money to acquire the equity of the target company. Two, the lenders who
invest their money in the bonds issued by the company, the proceeds of which are used by the
company to buy back shares from the remaining shareholders. The company extinguishes the
shares purchased through the buy-back.
In other words, the equity base of the target company decreases as a result of an LBO whereas its
debt increases. Subsequently, the target company has to repay the bondholders out of its future
income or by resale of its surplus assets. This requirement to compulsorily meet the obligation of
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
5/32
bondholders has one obvious advantage. It forces the company to cut costs and make better use
of its cash flows, which in turn helps in creating a lean and more efficient organization. But as
actual experience shows, many companies fail to do that.
A large number of high-profile LBOs of Wall
Street during the 1980s ultimately ended in
default. As a result, LBOs of public
companies virtually disappeared during the
early 1990s. During lean times, LBOs of
private companies were the only ray of hope.
Things again picked up only in the mid-2000s,
when LBOs of public companies made acomeback.
Johnny: Well, thanks for explaining all this, Jinny. I think, with the changing fortunes of the
financial market, things would continue moving up and down.
What: The process of LBOs involves
acquisition of a company by using a small
portion of equity and a large portion of
outside debt financing.
Who: LBOs are most commonly used by
private equity players.
Where: LBOs first emerged during the 1980s
in the US, Canada and UK
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
6/32
Sources of leverage
y Bank Debt is usually provided by one of more commercial banks lending to the
transaction. It is usually comprised of two components: a
revolving credit facility and term debt. Bank lenders have the
most senior claim against the cash flows of the business. As
such, bank debt has the senior claim on the assets of the
Company, with bank debt principal and interest payments
taking precedence over other, junior sources of debt financing.
- A revolving credit facility (bank revolver) is a source of
funds that the bought-out firm can draw upon as its working
capital needs dictate. A revolving credit facility is designed to
offer the bought out firm some flexibility with respect to its
capital needs. It serves as a line of credit that allows the firm to
make certain capital investments, deal with unforeseen costs, or
cover increases in working capital without having to seek additional debt or equity
The purpose of an LBO is to
allow an acquirer to make
large acquisitions without
having to commit a significa
amount of capital. In a typic
international LBO structure,
acquisition company is set u
in the target company's
jurisdiction, which then
acquires the target. The debis secured through the asse
of the target company.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
7/32
financing. Credit facilities usually have maximum borrowing limits and conservative
repayment terms. The model below assumes that the company uses excess cash flow to
repay outstanding borrowings against its credit facility.
- Term debt, which is often secured by the assets of the bought-out firm, is also provided
by banks and insurance companies in the form of private placement investments. Term
debt is usually priced with a spread above treasury notes and has maturities of five to ten
years. The amortization of term debt is negotiable and can be a straight-line amortization
or interest-only payments during the first several years with full amortization payments
thereafter.
y Mezzanine Financing is so named because it exists in the middle of the capital structure
and generally fills the gap between bank debt and the equity in a transaction. Mezzanine
financing is junior to the bank debt incurred in financing the leveraged buyout and can
take the form of subordinated notes from the private placement market or high-yield
bonds from the public markets, depending on the size and attractiveness of the deal.
Mezzanine financing is compensated for its lower priority and higher level of risk with
SUMMARY OF SOURCES
y LBO sponsors have equity funds raised from institutions likepensions & insurance companies
y Balance from commercial banks (bridge loans, term loans,revolvers).
y Banks concentrate on collateral of the company, cash flows, levelof equity financing from the sponsor, coverage ratios, ability to
repay (5-7 yr)
y Some have Mezzanine Funds as well that can be used for juniorsubordinated debt and preferred
y Occasionally, sponsors bring in other equity investors or anothersponsor to minimize their exposure.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
8/32
higher interest rates, either cash, paid-in-kind (PIK) or both, and, at times, warrants to
purchase typically 2% to 5% of the pro forma companys common equity.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
9/32
Ideal LBO candidate
The following are the features which one should try to find out in a target company before
acquiring it.
According to Jennifer Lindsey in her bookThe Entrepreneur's Guide to Capital,the best
candidate for a successful LBO will be in growing industry, have hard assets to act as collateral for large
loans, and feature top-quality, entrepreneurial management talent. It is also vital that the LBO candidate
post a strong historical cash flow and have low capital requirements, because the debt resulting from the LBO
must be retired as quickly as possible. Ideally, the company should have at least twice as much cash flow as
will be required for payments on the proposed debt.
At a high level, potential LBO candidates would be undervalued stocks with strong cash flows,
and relatively low debt. Other characteristics of target companies include:
y Large asset base
y Low future capital requirements
y Potential for process improvements or cost reductions
y Strong market position
y Relatively low enterprise value
y Steady and predictable cash flow
y Divestible assets
y Clean balance sheet with little debt
y Strong management team
y Strong, defensible market position
y Viable exit strategy
y Limited working capital requirements
y Synergy opportunities
y Minimal future capital requirements
y Potential for expense reduction
Finally, the ideal leveraged buyout candidate would be a company that can be easily separated
into logical subdivisions and / or presents the acquirer with a clear exit strategy.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
10/32
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
11/32
Gains through LBOs
A successful LBO can provide a small business with a number of advantages. For one thing, it
can increase management commitment and effort because they have greater equity stake in the
company. In a publicly traded company, managers typically own only a small percentage of the
common shares, and therefore can participate in only a small fraction of the gains resulting from
improved managerial performance. After an LBO, however, executives can realize substantial
financial gains from enhanced performance.
This improvement in financial incentives for the firm's managers should result in greater effort
on the part of management. Similarly, when employees are involved in an LBO, their increased
stake in the company's success tends to improve their productivity and loyalty. Another potential
advantage is that LBOs can often act to revitalize a mature company. In addition, by increasing
the company's capitalization, an LBO may enable it to improve its market position.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
12/32
Examples of LBOs
As a business group Tata has been fairly aggressive in cross borderM&A deals across sectors.
Few of the major deals announced by the group in the recent past are:
Tata Teas acquisition of 30% in US Glaceau (Energy Brands) in August 2006 for
$677 million.
Tata Tea bought 33 per cent in South African tea company Joekels through its
subsidiary Tetley Group
Tata Tea acquired US-based EightO clock coffee company for $220 million in June
2006
Taj Hotels acquired 100% stake inRitz- Boston for US$170
Tata Chemicals picked 63.5 per cent
in UKs BrunnerMond Group for
Rs 508 crore in December 2005
Tata Steel acquired Millennium Steel of Thailand in December 2005 for $404 million
TCS acquired Chilean BPO firm Comicorn for $23 million in November 2005
Case of TATA and its acquisitions
The takeover of Corus by Tata Steel reminds us of another acquisition by the Tata Group. This
was Tata Teas purchase of Tetley, owner of the iconic tea brand, in 2000. The purchase of
Tetley was the largest cross-border deal by an Indian company at the time, just as the Corus deal
is one of the biggest of its type today. In both deals, the acquirer was smaller than the target.
Both involve an overseas special purpose vehicle to raise junk bonds to fund leveraged buy-outs
(LBOs). And Tata Tea shareholders were initially concerned that the Tetley acquisition would
dilute the earning power of their equity; Tata Steel shares fell sharply on Wednesday on similar
concerns. But the Tatas did eventually turn around Tetley and used the extra cash flow to re-pay
the expensive debt raised to fund the acquisition. Can they do an encore with Corus?
One of the largest LBOs on record was
the acquisition of HCA Inc. in 2006 by
Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR), Bain &
Co., and Merrill Lynch. The three
companies paid around $33 billion for the
acquisition.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
13/32
The nature of the business is different. Unlike Tetley, Corus is in a notoriously cyclical business
where cash flows are volatile. A downturn in the steel industry could threaten this LBO.
Today, 18% of TataMotors' revenues and 20% of Indian Hotel's revenues comes from
international operations, for Tata Tea, it's 70%. And of course, far more people around the world
drink Tata Tea products than TCS products.
Tata Tea is now the second largest player in the branded tea segment globally and has a presence
in 40 countries. The international expansion has all been through Tetley, which is a Tata Tea
subsidiary. Peter Unsworth, the London-based chief operating officer of The Tetley Group says,
"We have now moved beyond Tetley UK, to create a global brand portfolio. "This has been
through acquisitions like Good Earth(USA), Jemca (Czech Republic) and Vitax and Flosana(Poland).
This gives the company a presence in both the emerging and developed markets, along with
reducing dependency on any one geography. According to Unsworth, the evolution of Tetley and
Tata Tea has been somewhat parallel, with Tetley too changing focus from packed tea to brands
and now to beverages. The company has reinvented itself over the years, from being a
predominantly black tea business when it was acquired to having a significant presence in fruit
and herbal teas.
Tata Tea's acquisition of UK-based
Tetley for 271 million was
highlighted in the media as India's
first mega LBO.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
14/32
List of buyouts by Indian
companiesTarget Company
Country Indian Acquirer Value Type
Tetley United Kingdom Tata Tea 271 million LBO
Whyte &Mackay United Kingdom UB Group 550 million LBO
Corus United Kingdom Tata Steel $11.3 billion LBO
Hansen Transmissions Netherlands Suzlon Energy 465 million LBO
American Axle1
United States TataMotors $2 billion LBO
Lombardini2
Italy Zoom Auto
Ancillaries
$225 million LBO
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
15/32
News related to LBO in India
22 MAY, 2008, 01.01AM IST, GAURAV TANEJA
Inbound acquisitions and investments are continuing in India. But a few prominent challenges
revolving around the tax and regulatory environment may prove to be potential road blocks, if
not proactively identified and addressed. Let us begin with leveraged buyouts (LBOs).
Perhaps LBOs are easier for Indian companies when they are acquiring an overseas target. Here,
the acquisition company is set up abroad and as regards foreign debt, this company is bound
largely by the banking norms and regulations of the foreign country.
On the other hand, a foreign company, wishing to use the LBO route, by setting up an acquisition
company in India and acquiring an Indian company, perhaps faces more challenges. One of the
main regulatory hurdles relates to restrictions on borrowings by an acquirer company set up in
India for the purpose of acquiring an Indian target.
Indian companies are permitted to borrow from domestic banks for purchasing equity in foreign
joint ventures, wholly-owned subsidiaries and other companies as strategic investments. Indian
companies also have the option of funding overseas acquisitions through external commercial
borrowings.
Recently the regulations have been further liberalised to permit total overseas investments by
Indian companies to be as much as 400% of the net-worth, as on the date of their last audited
balance sheet.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
16/32
MANAGEMENT BUYOUT
A management buyout (MBO) is a form ofacquisition where a company's existing managers
acquire a large part or all of the company.
Management buyouts are similar in all major legal aspects to any other acquisition of a company.
The particular nature of theMBO lies in the position of the buyers as managers of the company,
and the practical consequences that follow from that. In particular, the due diligence process is
likely to be limited as the buyers already have full knowledge of the company available to them.
The seller is also unlikely to give any but the most basic warranties to the management, on the
basis that the management know more about the company than the sellers do and therefore the
sellers should not have to warrant the state of the company.
In many cases the company will already be a private company, but if it is public then the
management will take it private.
Some concerns about management buyouts are that the asymmetric information possessed by
management may offer them unfair advantage relative to current owners. The impending
possibility of an MBO may lead to principal-agent problems, moral hazard, and perhaps even the
subtle downward manipulation of the stock price prior to sale via adverse information
disclosure - including accelerated and aggressive loss recognition, public launching of
questionable projects and adverse earning surprises. Naturally, such corporate governance
concerns also exist whenever current senior management is able to benefit personally from the
sale of their company or its assets. This would include, for example, large parting bonuses for
CEOs after a takeover or management buyout.
Since corporate valuation is often subject to considerable uncertainty and ambiguity, and since it
can be heavily influenced by asymmetric or inside information, some question the validity of
MBOs and consider them to potentially represent a form of insider trading.
The mere possibility of an MBO or a substantial parting bonus on sale may create perverse
incentives that can reduce the efficiency of a wide range of firms - even if they remain as public
companies. This represents a substantial potential negative externality.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
17/32
Purpose
The purpose of such a buyout from the managers' point of view may be to save their jobs, either
if the business has been scheduled for closure or if an outside purchaser would bring in its own
management team. They may also want to maximize the financial benefits they receive from the
success they bring to the company by taking the profits for themselves. This is often a way to
ward off aggressive buyers.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
18/32
Financing
Debt Financing
The management of a company will not usually have the money available to buy the company
outright themselves. They would first seek to borrow from a bank, provided the bank was willing
to accept the risk.Management buyouts are frequently seen as too risky for a bank to finance the
purchase through a loan.Management teams are typically asked to invest an amount of capital
that is significant to them personally, depending on the funding source/banks determination of
the personal wealth of the management team. The bank then loans the company the remaining
portion of the amount paid to the owner. Companies that proactively shop aggressive funding
sources should qualify for total debt financing of at least four times (4X) cash flow.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
19/32
Private Equity Financing
If a bank is unwilling to lend, the management will commonly look to private equity investors to
fund the majority of buyout. A high proportion of management buyouts are financed in this way.
The private equity investors will invest money in return for a proportion of the shares in the
company, though they may also grant a loan to the management. The exact financial structuring
will depend on the backer's desire to balance the risk with its return, with debt being less risky
but less profitable than capital investment.
Although the management may not have resources to buy the company, private equity houses
will require that the managers each make as large an investment as they can afford in order to
ensure that the management are locked in by an overwhelming vested interest in the success of
the company. It is common for the management to re-mortgage their houses in order to acquire a
small percentage of the company.
Private equity backers are likely to have somewhat different goals to the management. They
generally aim to maximise their return and make an exit after 35 years while minimising risk to
themselves, whereas the management rarely look beyond their careers at the company and will
take a long-term view.
While certain aims do coincide - in particular the primary aim of profitability - certain tensions
can arise. The backers will invariably impose the same warranties on the management in relation
to the company that the sellers will have refused to give the management. This "warranty gap"
means that the management will bear all the risk of any defects in the company that affects its
value.
As a condition of their investment, the backers will also impose numerous terms on the
management concerning the way that the company is run. The purpose is to ensure that the
management run the company in a way that will maximise the returns during the term of the
backers' investment, whereas the management might have hoped to build the company for long-
term gains. Though the two aims are not always incompatible, the management may feel
restricted.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
20/32
The European buyout market was worth 43.9bn in 2008, a 60 per cent fall on the 108.2bn of
deals in 2007. The last time the buyout market was at this level was in 2001 when it reached just
34bn.[1]
Seller Financing
In certain circumstances it may be possible for the management and the original owner of the
company to agree a deal whereby the seller finances the buyout. The price paid at the time of
sale will be nominal, with the real price being paid over the following years out of the profits of
the company. The timescale for the payment is typically 37 years.
This represents a disadvantage for the selling party, which must wait to receive its money after it
has lost control of the company. It is also dependent on the returned profits being increased
significantly following the acquisition, in order for the deal to represent a gain to the seller in
comparison to the situation pre-sale. This will usually only happen in very particular
circumstances.
The vendor may nevertheless agree to vendor financing for tax reasons, as the consideration will
be classified as capital gain rather than as income. It may also receive some other benefit such as
a higher overall purchase price than would be obtained by a normal purchase.
The advantage for the management is that they do not need to become involved with private
equity or a bank and will be left in control of the company once the consideration has been paid.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
21/32
Examples
A classic example of anMBO involved Springfield Remanufacturing Corporation, a former
plant in Springfield, Missouri owned by Navistar (at that time, International Harvester) which
was in danger of being closed or sold to outside parties until its managers purchased the
company.
In the UK, New Look was the subject of a management buyout in 2004 by Tom Singh, the
founder of the company who had floated it in 1998. He was backed by private equity houses
Apax and Permira, who now own 60% of the company. An earlier example of this in the UK was
the management buyout of Virgin Interactive from Viacom which was led by Mark Dyne.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
22/32
The Virgin Group has undergone several management buyouts in recent years. On September 17,
2007, Sir Richard Branson announced that the UK arm of Virgin Megastores was to be sold off
as part of a management buyout, and from November 2007, will be known by a new name,
Zavvi. On September 24, 2008, another part of the Virgin group, Virgin Comics underwent a
management buyout and changed its name to Liquid Comics. In the UK and Ireland, Virgin
Radio also underwent a similar process and became Absolute Radio.
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS INMBO
Management buyouts gaining momentum
PRIVATE EQUITY WATCH
Reena Zachariah /Mumbai July 24, 2007
Private equity players in India, triggered by consolidation of domestic businesses, cross-border
M&As (merger and acquisitions) and split in family-owned companies, are going for big
buyouts, mostly, management buyouts.
The first six months of the year alone saw 29 PE deals worth $2,435.3 million taking place in the
country, compared with 68 deals worth $2328.3 last year (full year), according to Thomson
Financial.
Globally, India ranks 16 among the countries with most PE deals signed in 2007. It tops the chart
among the BRIC (Brazil, Russia, India and China) countries, followed by Brazil, which had PE
buyout deals worth $1,543.6 million. In comparison, China struck deals worth $678.7 million
and Russia saw deals worth $68.1 million.
With more and more family-owned businesses are becoming smaller or are splitting, andentering into other businesses, domestic firms are entering into M&A deals and consolidations
taking place, we will see a lot more PE deals in India.Most of our buyouts have been not for
leverage but for growth, said Aluri S Rao, director, ICICI Ventures.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
23/32
Some of the buyouts by ICICI ventures are Tebma Shipyard, Ace Refractories and Ranbaxy Fine
Chemicals, which were later converted into management buyout (MBO).
PEs bring a lot more focus into a company. They also bring corporate governance into
companies, which are family-run businesses, by converting them into management-run
businesses. Besides, they also incentivise the management with equity, he explained.
This year we expect private equity investments in India to be in excess of $10 billion, said Atul
Mehta, partner of Ernst &Youngs PE practice.
Some of the top management buyouts in India in the past include the UK-based CDC Capital
Partners buying into ICI India and OakHill Capital Partners buying out exlService.com (I).
India is moving towards global trends and some of the largest PE deals globally have been
MBOs. MBOs will continue in the days to come and it will be seen across sectors. However, we
will see more such deals in the captive BPO segment, as lot of the large companies are exiting
from their non-core businesses. The ticket size ofMBOs will continue to increase, he added.
Last month, US-based private equity firm Blackstone bought 80 per cent in Intelenet, a business
process outsourcing firm from Barclays and HDFC for close to $109 million.
Through our conversations with Barclays and HDFC, we thought that one of the best options
for us would be as a management to tie up with a PE firm. From the perspective of employee
retention also, it made a lot of sense, said Susir Kumar, CEO, Intelenet.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
24/32
MANAGEMENT BUY-IN
A management buy-in (MBI) is the purchase of a business by a new management team, usually
with private equity funding. Unlike a management buy-out (MBO), there is a complete change of
management. Whether this is a good or bad thing depends on the business. The advantages of a
MBI are:
y A wider choice of buyers means the business can be sold for a better price a possible
MBO may deter other potential buyers.
y The change may be desirable if the business is not currently well managed.
y The new management team may be better placed (contacts, reputation, etc.) to find
backing.
The disadvantages are:
y The new management team do not know the business.
y They are regarded as riskier, so can be harder to get backing for.
y The existing management are likely to be demotivated in the meantime.
y Difference to management buy-out is the position of the purchaser. They are either
already working for the company in the case of a buy-out, or, a manager or management
team is from another source in the case of a buy-in.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
25/32
y
y
Among the private equity groups and executive search firms that focus on management
buy-ins are GTCR Golder Rauner, Frontenac Company, and Pinnacle CEO Recruiters.
What DoesEmployee Buyout - EBOMean?
A restructuring strategy in which employees buy a majority stake in their own firms. This form
of buyout is often done by firms looking for an alternative to a leveraged buyout. Companies
being sold can be either healthy companies or ones that are in significant financial distress.
For small firms, an employee buyout will often focus on the sale of the company's entire assets,
while for larger firms, the buyout may be on a subsidiary or division of the company. The
official way an employee buyout occurs is through an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP).
The buyout is complete when the ESOP owns 51% or more of the company's common share.
Put simply, an employee buy-out is a transaction in which the employees of a business join with
financing institutions to buy the business from its present owners.
The institutions put up most of the finance required in the form of debt and equity, with the
intention of realising a significant return on their investment in a short period of time (typically
five to seven years).
The employees retain a significant part of the equity, If the initial high levels of debt are repaid
as planned, a significant part of the value of the business will accrue to the employees.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
26/32
To date, management buy-outs have been more common in Australia than employee buy-outs.
Management buy-outs usually only involve the top executive managers buying the business from
the present owners. Recognition that there are potentially greater benefits from involving all
employees in a buy-out can result in employee buy-outs becoming much more prevalent in the
future.
Employee ownership makes sense commercially as real life examples
point to substantial increases in motivation, productivity and
profitability following an employee buy-out.
Comments from new employee owners
..you just put 150% in instead of 100%.
..yeah, I mean you tried your hardest before because, I mean, thats
a job you got to do your best at your job. But now I suppose you just
put that little bit extra in.
Im my boss and I dont perform we dont make extra money and
I dont get dividends, I dont get bonuses.
You know that its for you, not someone else, so you seem to have
more pride, I suppose youd say, in your work.
Divestment
A parent company may wish to sell a subsidiary, which is not part of its core business or part of
its future plans, in order to obtain funds to reduce borrowings or make an investment elsewhere.
Businessin distress
A poorly performing business may be threatened with closure by its current owners to prevent
further losses. In order to save their jobs, the employees could buy the business from the current
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
27/32
owners. This is a high risk situation and the comments on a financially viable business (page 8)
should be noted.
Privatization
It is common for governments to seek to sell public sector enterprises to the private sector, to
reduce the burden on the public sector. An alternative option to a trade sale or a float is a sell off
to the employees of the business.
Effective employee team
The optimum employee buy-out team is one which:
is strong in each fundamental area of the business
has a proven track record in the business
has the required management capability
is harmonious
is ambitious
The employee team will need to convince financing institutions that it has the capability to
manage the business in an independent environment, and to provide sufficient returns on the
finance provided by the institutions.
It does not necessarily follow that an employee team which has been effective in running the
operations of the business will have the motivation and ability to cope successfully with the
strains of management and ownership following a buy-out.
It is essential to ensure the recognition by all people of a leader within the group to control the
day to day operations of the business. This may involve re-training and the use of consultants to
enhance leadership skills.
A change in work attitudes will also be required from the employees. The goal should be
securing the future rather than making short term profits. There needs to be a readiness to accept
the attitude that the survival of the business depends on all personnel, and not just the workers or
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
28/32
the managers. It may also be necessary to develop a higher level of skills for many employees in
order to prepare for future changes in the market and technological advances.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
29/32
Financially viable proposition
A successful employee buy-out could be defined as the purchase of predictable cash flows at an
economically reasonable price. This definition refers to two key factors which must be present
for the buy-out to be a success:
1. Reasonable purchase price
2. Strong cash flows
It is obvious that a buy-out cannot succeed if the purchase price is excessive. An excessive
purchase price will require an upfront cash outlay and subsequent interest payments which, if
funding can be achieved at all, will place too much pressure on subsequent cash flows, with the
result that the business will fail.
Critical Success Factors
The critical success factors for an employee buy-out are:
Willing seller
This is likely to be due to:
Retirement of owner;
Realisation of personal investment;
Divestment of business by parent company;
Business in distress;
Privatisation by government.
Effective employee team
Characterised by:
Management capability;
Strength in all areas of the operation;
Recognition of a leader;
Additional training;
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
30/32
Long term attitude.
Financially viable proposition
A combination of:
Reasonable purchase price;
String and predictable cash flows.
Forms of employee buy-outs
There are several different forms of employee buy-outs, which provides the flexibility to adapt a
buy-out to a particular situation. In this booklet we will only cover the major forms of employee
buy-outs, as these will probably be the forms you choose to use in your own buy-out. Every
business and group of employees is different, and professional advice will need to be obtained to
ensure the form of buy-out that you select is appropriate to your situation.
The main structures used for employee buy-outs are:
Co-operatives
Employee Share Ownership Plans (ESOPs)
Co-operativesA co-operative is a form of business organisation similar to that of a company. Like a company,
the members of a co-operative have limited liability. A co-operative is a democratic organisation
and is formed when a group of people get together to work towards a common objective. A co-
operative may be formed to supply goods and services to the general public or to it's members. In
an employee buyout, the common objectives can include preserving employees' jobs and
generating an additional income for members by sharing profits.
Underlying all co-operative enterprises are the seven basic co-operative principles adopted by the
International Co-operative Alliance (ICA). These are:
1. Voluntary association and open membership
2. Democratic member control
3. Member economic participation
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
31/32
4. Autonomy and independence
5. Education, training and information
6. Co-operation among co-operatives
7. Concern for community
Traditionally, agricultural and consumer type co-operatives have been very popular. However, in
many parts of the world, workers have got together and formed worker co-operatives. In
Australia, we have a number of examples of successful worker co-operatives (now commonly
known as Employee Owned Co-operative Enterprises).
Co-operatives provide a basis for the mutual achievement of economic and social needs which
may be unavailable to the individual in the private or public sectors. It is a form of enterprise
suited to small and medium sized business, and is relatively less complex and costly to
incorporate and administer than most forms of corporate entities.
8/4/2019 Leverage Buyouts - Copy
32/32
References
y http://www.enotes.com/small-business-encyclopedia/leveraged-buyouts
y http://www.livemint.com/2008/01/09121811/Needed-A-Tetley-encore.html
y http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/features/tata/tata-teas-strategies-for-that-global-cup-of-tea/articleshow/2673792.cms
y http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management_buyout
y http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/management-buyouts-gaining-
momentum/292035/
y http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/ebo.asp#axzz1VIjJJn00
y http://www.mercury.org.au/PDFs/Employee%20Buyouts%20100909.pdf
y
http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2011/08/11/baltimore-sun-proposes-employee-buyouts/y http://www.aeret.eu/en/contents/news/ShowNews/employee-buyout-at-trp-101