+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Lexical Semantics. An Introduction

Lexical Semantics. An Introduction

Date post: 18-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: limei
View: 36 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Lexical Semantics. An Introduction. Boris Iomdin Russian Language Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences [email protected]. Lecture 11. Plan. Semantics, syntactics, pragmatics Linguistic pragmatics Speech acts theory Taxonomy of illocutionary acts Performatives Indirect speech acts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
29
Boris Iomdin Russian Language Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Boris IomdinRussian Language Institute,

Russian Academy of [email protected]

Page 2: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Lecture 11. PlanSemantics, syntactics, pragmaticsLinguistic pragmaticsSpeech acts theory

Taxonomy of illocutionary actsPerformativesIndirect speech acts

Speaker and Hearer in social hierarchiesGricean maxims for conversationTheory of implicatures

Page 3: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

PragmaticsCh. Morris, Foundations of the Theory of Signs, 1938Formal relations of signs to one another:

syntacticsRelations of signs to objects: semanticsRelations of signs to interpreters: pragmaticsLinguistic pragmatics (Apresjan):Attitude of the Speaker…

to the real worldto the contents of his/her own messageto the Hearer

…contained in a lexical unit

Page 4: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Speaker and real worldAssessments

positive-negativemuch-littledesirable-undesirable…

Page 5: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Speaker and messageFalse-True

certainprobabledoubtfulimprobableimpossible

Illocutionary force

Page 6: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Speech acts theoryJ. Searle, Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy

of language, 1969Talking is performing acts according to rulesUttering words and sentences = utterance

acts Referring and predicating = propositional

actsStating, questioning, promising, … =

illocutionary acts

Page 7: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Illocutionary acts. TaxonomyPurpose of the act. Examples:

order: getting the Hearer to do somethingpromise: obligation by the Speaker to do

somethingDirection of fitExpressed psychological states (sincerity

condition):beliefintention…

Page 8: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Illocutionary acts. TaxonomyForce of strength with which the illocutionary

point (purpose) is presentedI suggest we go to the moviesI insist that we go to the moviesI solemnly swear that Bill stole the moneyI guess Bill stole the money

Status or position of the Speaker and Hearera general orders a private, a private asks a

general

Page 9: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Illocutionary acts. TaxonomyDifferences in the way the utterance relates to

the interests of the Speaker and the HearerRelations to the rest of the discourse

I reply – I object – I concludehowever – moreover – therefore

Differences in propositional contentActs that must always be speech acts and acts

that need not be speech actscongratulation – always a speech actconclusion – not necessarily

Page 10: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Illocutionary acts. TaxonomyActs that require extra-linguistic knowledge

excommunicatechristenpronounce guilty…

Style of performancePerformatives

Page 11: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

PerformativesJ. Austin, How to do things with words, 1965I wish you a merry ChristmasI accuse you of murderI advise you not to go thereI assure you that he will not comeI name this ship the “Queen Elizabeth”I pronounce you husband and wifeA verb is called performative if its uttering

(usually in 1st person Present Singular) is equal to doing the action it describes

Page 12: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Main features of performativesPerformative utterances are not true

or false, that is, not truth-evaluableWhen something is wrong with

them, they are "happy" or "unhappy"The uttering of a performative is

doing a certain kind of action (an illocutionary act) and not just "saying" or "describing"

Page 13: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Types of performativesExpositives: report, affirm, agree, declare,

remind, …Commissives: promise, contract, bet, …Exercitives: pardon, nominate, hire,

sentence, …Behabitives: apologize, thank, congratulate,

…Operatives: appoint, proclaim, …Requests: request, implore, insist, ……

Page 14: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Linguistic propertiesUsed in 1 Sg, but not only:

Passengers are requested to proceed to departure gate

Cannot be used in the progressive tense:*I am wishing you a merry Christmas

Cannot be combined with temporal modifiers*I promise you for ten minutes to come back

Cannot be combined with assessments:*I impolitely insist that you leave

Page 15: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Semantic invariant?All performatives contain the semantic

component ‘to say’?

Some performatives do not: hire, agree, …Some verbs contain the component ‘to say’

but cannot be used as performatives: lie, shout, mutter, …

Z. Vendler, Illocutionary suicide, 1976: I lie, I boast, I hint, …

Page 16: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Indirect speech actsThe Speaker communicates to the Hearer more

than he actually says by way of relying on their mutually shared background information, both linguistic and nonlinguistic, together with the general powers of rationality and inference on the part of the Hearer

Could you pass me the salt?Excuse me, do you have a watch?– Would you like to go to the movies?

– I have much homework.

Page 17: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Speaker and HearerPlace in various hierarchies: age, sex, social status, …Form of address: Sir, Professor Smith, dear students,

mom, honey, pal, buddy, hey you, over there…Title + last name / first name / name + patronymic…T/V distinction: French tu/vous, Russian ty/Vy,

Italian tu/Lei, German du/Sie, …Differences:

German T is more applied in family than French TFrench T is more applied for fellow students, soldiers, …symmetrical vs. asymmetrical usage

Page 18: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

T/V in Russian: oppositionsChildren aged 2-3 or younger to everyone: TEveryone to children aged 8-9 or younger: TChildren aged 15-16 or younger to each other: TChildren to parents and parents to children, any

age: TStudents to teachers or professors: VTeachers to schoolchildren: mostly TProfessors to students: VNot within a dialogue: T (notices, slogans,

speaking with dead people, mythical beings, objects etc.)

Page 19: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Politeness levels in Japanese

Page 20: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Usage labels in dictionariesNonstandardColloquialSlangDisparagingOffensiveObsceneVulgar …

Page 21: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Maxims of conversationP. Grice, Logiс and conversation, 1975The co-operative principleThe maxim of QualityThe maxim of QuantityThe maxim of RelevanceThe maxim of Manner

Page 22: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Co-operative principleMake your contribution such as us

required, at the stage at which it occurs, by the accepted purpose or direction of the talk exchange in which you are engaged

Page 23: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

The maxim of QualityTry to make your contribution one

that is true, specifically:Do not say what you believe to be

falseDo not say that for which you lack

adequate evidence

Page 24: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

The maxim of QuantityMake your contribution as

informative as is required for the current purposes of the exchange

Do not make your contribution more informative than is required

John has 3 children.Cannot be said if John has 5 children!

Page 25: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

The maxim of RelevanceMake your contribution relevant

– Can you tell me the time?– Well, the milkman has come.

– Our professor is an old fool, isn’t he?– What a nice weather for November!

Page 26: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

The maxim of MannerBe perspicuous, and specifically:Avoid obscurity Avoid ambiguityBe briefBe orderly

John went to the store and bought some apples.

Page 27: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Gricean maxims and indirect SAPeople mostly violate the maxims. But:They are needed to understand utterances

that seem inappropriate on a deeper level– Where is our professor?

– There is a traffic jam at the highway.

– I don’t have a 20 Crowns coin.

– There is a tobacco shop across the street.

– Let’s get the kids something.

– OK, but no I-C-E-C-R-E-A-M-S.

Page 28: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Theory of implicaturesS has said that PThere is no reason to think that S is not observing the

maxims, or at least the co-operative principleIn order for S to say that P and be indeed observing the

maxims or the co-operative principle, S must think that Q

S must know that it is mutual knowledge that Q must be supposed if S is to be taken to be co-operating

S has done nothing to stop me, the addressee, thinking that Q

Therefore S intends me to think that Q, and in saying that P has implicated Q

Page 29: Lexical Semantics.  An Introduction

Next lecture

Semantic annotation of text corpora. Fundamental classification of predicates. Case studies.


Recommended