L‘expressió oral al nivel C1: conclusions
Josie Pont (EOI Drassanes), Karen MacKarty (EOI Cornellà), Rodrigo Alonso (EOI Viladecans), Marcel·lí Armengou (EOI Terrassa), Miguel Ángel Castillo Muñoz (EOI Manresa), Charo Colubí (EOI Vall d’Hebron), Clara Espelt (EOII Maresme), Sílvia Matz (EOI Sant Gervasi), Isabel Minguell (EOI Vall d’Hebron), Kim Parcerisas (EOI Osona), Cédric Sautour (EOI Cornellà), Sílvia Milian (EOI del Prat).
Integrants del grup de treball
6
Objectius curs 2016-17
• Continuar millorant la nostra pràctica docent a l'aula pel que fa a l'expressió oral de l'alumnat.
• Proporcionar eines per fomentar l’ús de la llengua fora de l’aula, per tal de continuar estimulant el desenvolupament tant de l’autonomia de l’alumnat com del treball col·laboratiu
• Aconseguir que l’alumnat incorpori i utilitzi amb precisió un ventall de vocabulari i estructures gramaticals complexes pròpies de nivell C1
• Aconseguir que l’alumne incorpori i utilitzi diferent registres en el seu discurs de manera acurada.
• Preparar un dossier d’activitats imprescindibles que permetin a l’alumne millorar la seva fonètica (pronúncia, ritme i entonació)
• Implementar i avaluar les activitats d’aula proposades el curs anterior i proporcionar feedback
Estratègies curs 2016-17
• Reflexió sobre la nostra pràctica docent a l’aula (gestió de l’aula, aspectes de correcció, auto-estima de l’alumnat) i modificacions de la mateixa a partir del pilotatge de diferents activitats a l’aula.
• Recopilació de bibliografia i material existent sobre el tema
• Modificació, de les rubriques d’avaluació a partir dels resultats del pilotatge
Activitats de pilotaje 2016-17
• Pilotatge d’activitats d’aula per a la millora de l’expressió oral: debats de “Loose Women”, “The Guardian 5 minute debates”, “Dramatic monologues”, “Mock presentations”, “Mock debates”
• Pilotatge de rúbriques per avaluar tasques d’expressióoral (rubrica del professor, peer assessment, self-assessment): debats i presentacions
Avaluació pilotatge 2016-17
• Grau de satisfacció dels membres del grup de treball
• Grau de satisfacció dels alumnes amb les activitats proposades
• Valoració dels altres membres dels grups de treball de C1 (CO i EE)
• Grau de millora observat i quantificat pel que fa a l’expressió oral dels nostres alumnes.
1. Debats
• Activitat triada: “Loose Women: Silver splitters”• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JubVAHZA
euw• Tots els membres del grup pilotem la mateixa
activitat, amb les mateixes tasques i el mateix full d’avaluació, que mostrem a continuació:
6
Els debats
• Importància d’activar vocabulari i expressions adequades per les diferents parts del debat
• Els alumnes tenen diferents rols en els debats de pràctica
• Observar com debaten altres persones: “Loose Women” i “The Guardian 5 minute debates”
• Treballar els transcripts de diferents debats per identificar i incorporar expressions
• Fer brainstorming dels pros and cons d’un tema de debat abans de practicar a classe
Rise In Divorce | Loose Women
Warm up
1) Work in pairs. Discuss the following question:
● What does the expression ‘silver splitters’ refer to?
Listening
You are going to watch a short video about the rise in divorce.
2) Watch the short video and check your guesses.
3) Listen and take notes. https://youtu.be/JubVAHZAeuw
4) Work in pairs. Explain what it is said about:
A. Getting married later
B. Immigration
C. Older couples
D. Financial independence
E. Choice
F. Breakup
G. Key of older marriages
5) At home make the transcript of the debate.
6) Work in groups. Check the transcript.
7) Work in groups. Analyze the transcript and complete the table:
Topic-related words & phrases Arguments used by the
speakers to support their
points
Language for debates
Speaking
8) Choose two of the topics below to talk about. Spend a few minutes preparing what you
want to say about each one. Then work in groups and share your ideas. ● Why divorce rates are rising
● How to have a long and happy relationship
● The pros and cons of having kids
Evaluation of the class activity based on “Loose Women” debates: “Silver splitter and
divorce”
Please, rate from 1 to 4 the following aspects:
1. The activity was useful
1 2 3 4
2. The activity has allowed you to identify the structure of the argumentation in the
“Loose Women” program
1 2 3 4
3. The activity has allowed you to structure your debates in class better
1 2 3 4
4. The activity has allowed you to identify vocabulary and new expressions to be used in
your debates
1 2 3 4
5. The activity has allowed you to incorporate and use new vocabulary and expressions in
your discourse
1 2 3 4
6. The activity has allowed you to identify the discourse strategies used by the
participants
1 2 3 4
7. The activity has allowed you to incorporate and use some of the discourse strategies
used by the participants in your debates
1 2 3 4
Thanks for your time!!!!
1. Debats: resum enquesta alumnes
2. Dramatic monologues
• Dramatic Monologues for Listening Comprehension, Volume 2 , CUP(Colin Mortimer)
• El professor exemplifica un dels monòlegs als alumnes i n’assigna un a cada un
• Els alumnes preparen el monòleg a casa, que posteriorment llegeixen a classe
• Importància dels aspectes suprasegmentals
• Els companys de classe han de respondre unes preguntes en grups de quatre basades en allò que han entès
RUBRIC TO EVALUATE THE ACTIVITY DRAMATIC MONOLOGUES
Please, rate from 1 to 4 the following aspects (1-weak, 4-strong):
1. The activity was useful
1 2 3 4
2. The activity has allowed you to identify the importance of pronunciation to convey
meaning
1 2 3 4
3. The activity has allowed you to identify the important elements in speech (word stress,
sentence stress, intonation, rhythm, thought groups, chunking)
1 2 3 4
4. The activity has allowed you to feel more confident in front of an audience.
1 2 3 4
5. The activity has allowed you to incorporate the key elements of good pronunciation in
your performance
1 2 3 4
6. Did you enjoy yourself doing this activity?
1 2 3 4
Comments:
2. Dramatic monologues: buidatge enquesta satisfacció
3. Mock presentations
• Els alumnes trien un tema per presentar i el preparen a casa seguint les recomanacions treballades a classe.
• Després de la presentació, els companys de classe avaluen la presentació realitzada. El professor fa el mateix
• L’alumne que ha presentat completa un qüestionari d’autoavaluació a casa.
6
Presentacions: autoavaluació
GENERAL ASPECTS
1- What have you especially liked about your presentation?
2- What haven’t you liked at all?
3- How did you feel while you were giving your presentation?
4- What would you change if you could do it again?
INTERACTION
1- Did you make yourself understood? Do you think your classmates understood you?
How did you notice it?
2- Did you read during your presentation?
3- Do you think it was an original presentation?
6
Presentacions: autoavaluació
PRONUNCIATION AND INTONATION
1- Did you try to imitate the accent and intonation of English?
2- Before giving the presentation, did you check the pronunciation of the most
important words? How did you check it?
3- Which sounds do you think you pronounced well?
4- Which sounds do you think you can improve?
VOCABULARY AND STRUCTURES
1- Have you used at least ONE sophisticated grammatical structure?
2- Have you used signposting and at least 5 words or expressions learnt during this year?
6
Presentacions: peer assesment
� Was the presentation interesting? Lively? Clear? Was the pronunciation correct?
� Did the beginning have impact? Did you want to hear more?
� Was there a logical structure- a beginning, middle and end?
� Was it divided into sections? Did you hear any signposting language to tell you your partner was moving from one section to another?
� Was there a conclusion?
� In the Q&A were the questions answered with conviction?
� Can you briefly jot down the highlights and weakenesses of the presentation?
6
Presentacions: rúbrica professorNONVERBAL
SKILLS
5 4 3 2 1
EYE CONTACT
Holds attention of
entire audience
with the use of
direct eye contact,
not looking at
notes at all.
Consistent use of
direct eye contact
with audience,
seldom looking at
notes.
Use of direct eye
contact, but still
returns to notes.
Displayed minimal
eye contact with
audience, while
reading mostly
from notes.
No eye contact
with audience, as
entire
presentation is
read from notes.
BODY LANGUAGE
Fluid movements
which help the
audience visualise.
Movements and
gestures that
enhance
articulation and
speech delivery.
Few movements
and descriptive
gestures, but still
they enhance the
speech delivery.
Very little
movement or
descriptive
gestures.
No movement or
descriptive
features.
POISE
Student displays
relaxed, self-
confident nature
about self, with no
mistakes.
Student looks
relaxed and self-
confident, and
makes only minor
mistakes.
Student makes a
few mistakes, but
quickly recovers
from them;
displays little or no
tension.
1. Displays mild
tension; has
trouble recovering
from mistakes.
2. Doesn’t make
mistakes, but it’s
basically because
she/he is reading
all the time.
Tension and
nervousness is
obvious; has
trouble
recovering from
mistakes.
6
Presentacions: rúbrica professorVERBAL &
LANGUAGE
SKILLS
5 4 3 2 1
ENTHUSIASM Demonstrates a
strong, positive
feeling about the
topic during
entire
presentation.
Shows fairly
positive feelings
about the topic.
Occasionally
shows positive
feelings about the
topic.
Shows some
negativity about
the topic
presented.
Shows absolutely no
interest in the topic
presented.
ELOCUTION AND
PRONUNCIATION
Student uses a
clear voice and
correct, precise
pronunciation,
stress and
intonation.
Student’s voice is
clear. Student
pronounces most
words correctly
and the
intonation and
stress are fairly
accurate.
Student’s voice is
clear most of the
time. Some words
are pronounced
incorrectly and
the intonation is
not always
accurate.
Student’s voice is
low or
unintelligible.
Student
pronounces
words incorrectly
and some parts
are difficult to
follow.
Student mumbles,
incorrectly
pronounces terms,
it’s extremely
difficult to follow.
VOCABULARY
RANGE &
GRAMMATICAL
ACCURACY
Exceptional
resources, both
structural and
lexical. High level
of grammatical
accuracy.
Varied resources,
a few minor
mistakes.
Adequate but
limited resources.
Errors are
generalised
though they do
not impair
communication.
Very limited
resources and
many systematic
and non-
systematic errors
which impair
communication.
So poor there’s no
communication.
Many mistakes
which make it hard
to understand what
student is saying.
6
Presentacions: rúbrica professor
OVERALL IMPRESSION 5 4 3 2 1
ORGANISATION The type of
presentation is
appropriate for the
topic, uses signposting,
is totally intelligible,
clear, coherent and
logically structured.
Length of presentation
within the assigned
time limits.
Corresponds mostly to
the task. In general,
intelligible, clear and
coherent, though
there are some
mistakes concerning
the structure and
cohesion of the
discourse.
Length of presentation
within the assigned
time limits.
Corresponds partially
to the task. It’s not
clear and intelligible
enough. Many
mistakes concerning
the structure and
cohesion of the
discourse.
Length of presentation
beyond or below the
assigned time limits.
Doesn’t correspond to
the task. It’s not clear,
coherent or fluent. It’s
difficult to follow
because of the errors
in the structure and
the lack of cohesion in
the discourse.
. Length of
presentation beyond
or below the. assigned
time limits.
Doesn’t correspond to the
task. It’s difficult to assess
the speaker because the
presentation totally lacks
coherence and it’s not
intelligible.
Length of presentation
beyond or below the
assigned time limits.
MASTERY OF THE
SUBJECT & CONTENT
Original spoken
presentation with
depth of commentary.
Able to answer
questions properly.
There was a theme or
take-home message to
the presentation.
Original and mostly
spoken presentation,
seldom reads. Answers
questions fairly
confidently.
Quite relevant
presentation.
Relevant presentation
with traits of
spontaneity, but
student hasn’t
rehearsed enough and
sometimes hesitates
and needs to read
notes.
Memorised
presentation.
Quite boring,
irrelevant content or
/and not entirely
original.
Student has memorised
her/his presentation or
has been reading most of
it.
Very boring.
Please, rate from 1 to 4 the following aspects (1-weak, 4 strong)
1. The activity and its preparation have allowed me to structure my presentation
1 2 3 4
2. The activity and its preparation have allowed me to use signposting language in
presentations
1 2 3 4
3. Peer assessment has allowed me to learn and incorporate new elements for my
presentation
1 2 3 4
4. The feedback provided by my peers has been useful
1 2 3 4
4. The feedback provided by the teacher has been useful
1 2 3 4
5. The activity and its preparation have allowed me to improve my pronunciation
1 2 3 4
6. The activity and its preparation have allowed me to increase my confidence in front of an
audience
1 2 3 4
7. The activity and its preparation have allowed me to improve my rhythm, intonation and
stress.
1 2 3 4
8. The activity and its preparation have allowed me to improve my presentation skills
1 2 3 4
9. The activity and its preparation have allowed me to improve my fluency
1 2 3 4
Comments:
Pilotatge: enquesta “mock presentations”
Grau de millora observat
• A fi de poder quantificar el grau de millora observat, avaluem els mock debates i els mock presentations internament amb una còpia de la graella que fem servir a l’examen final.
• El diferencial entre el mock exam i l’examen final oscil·la entre 0 i 2 punts de mitjana
Conclusions
• Totes les activitats prèvies de pràctica de l’expressió oral, i la seva posada en escena en els mock presentations i mock debates han acabat tenint una incidència en el grau d’èxit dels nostres alumnes
• Aquestes activitats prèvies tenien com a objectiu la presa de consciència de la importància dels diferents aspectes relacionats amb l’expressió oral
• Us animem a continuar ampliant el banc d’activitats iniciat.
Gracias por vuestra atención