+ All Categories
Home > Documents > LHCb Physics prospects

LHCb Physics prospects

Date post: 04-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: odell
View: 27 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
LHCb Physics prospects. Marta Calvi Università Milano-Bicocca and INFN. On behalf of the LHCb collaboration. Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics Workshop CERN,3-4 December 2007. LHCb detector in place. The cavern is full: construction on schedule. Commissioning ongoing. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
33
LHCb Physics prospects Marta Calvi Università Milano-Bicocca and INFN On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics Workshop CERN,3-4 December 2007
Transcript
Page 1: LHCb Physics prospects

LHCb Physics prospects

Marta CalviUniversità Milano-Bicocca and INFN

On behalf of the LHCb collaboration

Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics WorkshopCERN,3-4 December 2007

Page 2: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (2/27

LHCb detector in place

Muon detector

Calorimeters

RICH-2

Magnet

OT

VELO

RICH-1

The cavern is full: construction on schedule. Commissioning ongoing. Will be ready for data-taking at 2008 LHC start-up.

Page 3: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (3/27

A possible running scenario2008 Calibration and Trigger commissioning Assume to integrate ~ 0.1 fb–1

2009 Start first significant physics data taking: >~ 0.5 fb–1

2010– Stable running. Expect ~ 2 fb–1/ year

LHCb should collect an integrated luminosity 10 fb–1 for year 2014±1

If found to be advantageous for physics, pushaverage luminosity from 21032 to 51032 cm–2s–1

pp interactions/crossing

LH

Cb

n=0

n=1

Page 4: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (4/27

Physics with “first year” data (0.5 fb–1)

Very interesting Bs results already with first 0.5 fb–1

Examples are:

CP violation in Bs J/s measurement )

Search for Bs decays, extending CDF+D0 limit

s0(AFB=0) in Bd K0* overtaking B-Factories

Before, high statistics channels will be used to calibrate the detector

performance and to demonstrate LHCb physics capabilities

Huge bb production at s=14TeV, in the forward region

230 b in 300 mrad

Corresponding to 1011 bb events in L=0.5 fb-1

bb angular correlation in

pp collisions at s = 14 TeV

(Pythia)

Page 5: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (5/27

LHCb expected performance

Results obtained from MC simulation (full Detector simulation):

b-decay track resolutions: impact parameter 30 m momentum resolution 0.36%

Particle ID performance with RICH

kaon ID eff. 88%, pion mis-ID 3%

Good K/ separation in 2-100 GeV/c range

Flavour Tagging performance

from combination of several methods:

D2 =45% for Bd

D2 =79 % for Bs depending on channel

Reconstructed B

resolutions: mass res. 14-18 MeV/c2

proper time res. 40 fs

Qvtx

Bs

B–

D

l-K–

K+PV

Page 6: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (6/27

The search strategy for New Physics Measurements with New Physics discovery potential

FCNC transitions and rare decays, where standard model contributions are

suppressed enough to allow potential small NP effects to emerge:

• Bs mixing phase (s)

• Very rare leptonic decays: eg. Bs

• Rare semi-leptonic decays: b sℓℓ (eg. Bd K0*BuKee/Bu K)

• Radiative decays: b s (eg. BdK*BsB , …)

• LFV decays (eg. Bs,d e

• CPV in D0 decays and rare D decays….

• Compare gamma from B(s) D(s) K decays and gamma from Bd and Bs KK

• Compare sin(2) from Bd J/KS and sin(2) from Bd KS

• Hadronic penguin b sssdecays ( eg.Bs

Precision measurements of CKM parameters, including angle

determination from tree level decays.

Page 7: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (7/27

B Mixing phases with bccs

2sinhcos

2cosh

)sin(sin)(

tt

tmtA

SSf

S

SSfCP

• Very small in SM: s = -2 = -0.037 ± 0.002 rad

• Could be much larger if New Physics contributes to Bs0-Bs

0 transitions

• No CP violation observedyet: s= 0.79 ± 0.56stat+ 0.01

-0.14 syst D0 with 1.1 fb-1

Measure time-dep. asymmetry in decay rates:

Use flavour tagged and untagged events.

Need very good proper time resolution to resolve Bs

0 oscillations.

Non pure CP modes (as BsJ/ ) need angular analysis to disentangle the mixture of CP-even (f=-1, A0, A||) and CP odd (f=+1, A)

1-angle analysis: tr

Increased precision from full 3-angles analysis under study.

total

CP even

CP oddflat background

Page 8: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (8/27

BsJ/and CP eigenstatesBsJ/()(KK) is the golden channel. Can add pure CP modes, but much lower statistics.

Decay Channel Yield

2fb-1

B/S Sensitivity s

J/(-+) () 8.5k 2.0 0.109

J/(-+) (+-0) 3.0k 3.0 0.142

J/(-+) ’(0) 4.2k <0.42 0.080

c(h-h+h-h+)(K+K-) 3.0k 0.6 0.108

Ds(K+K--) Ds(K+K-+) 4.0k 0.3 0.133

Pure CP modes 0.048

J/() 131k 0.12 0.023

All modes 0.021

Parameter Sensitivity with 2 fb-1

Γs/Γs 0.0092

RT 0.00040

After 10 fb-1 stat(s) = 0.009

> 3 evidence of non-zero s, even if only SM

Sensitivity to other fit parameters (from J/)

In 0.5 fb–1: (s)0.046

from BsJ/()

Page 9: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (9/27

New Physics in Bs mixing

2006 including ms measurement

With s from

Bs J/LHCb 2fb-1

Ligeti, Paucci,Perez, hep-ph/0604112

M12 1 hs exp(2is) M12SM

New Physics in Bs mixing amplitude M12 parameterized with hs and s:

Additional constraints can come from semileptonic Asymmetry. In SM: ASL

s 10-5.

hs

s

Preliminary results on the LHCb measurement of time dependent charge asymmetry in BsDs

Expect 109 events/ 2fb-1 (ASLs )2x10-3 in 2fb-1

ASLs

Page 10: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (10/27

Bs

- Highly suppressed in SM: BR(Bs→) =(3.55±0.33)x10-9

- Could be strongly enhanced by SUSY:

BR(Bs→ ) tan6/MH2

- Current Limit Tevatron ~2 fb-1: CDF BR < 4.7 x 10-8 90% CL D0 BR < 7.5 x 10-8 90% CL

- Within Constrained MSSM: current g-2 measurement (which deviates by 3.4 from SM) suggest gaugino mass in the range 450-650GeV at tan50 BR(Bs→ ) in the range 10-8 to10-7

SM prediction

W

W

b

s

t

SM

Page 11: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (11/27

Bs LHCb: high efficiency trigger for the signal, but main issue is background rejection.

Exploit good mass resolution and vertexing, and good particle ID.

Largest background is b , b . Specific background dominated by Bc

± →J/

Analysis in a Phase Space with 3 axis: • Geometrical Likelihood (GL) (impact parameters, distance of closest approach between , lifetime, vertex isolation) • Particle-ID Likelihood • Invariant Mass Window around Bs peak

- Sensitive Region: GL > 0.5

- Divide in N bins

- Evaluate expected number of events for signal/background in each bin.

signalbb inc.b μ, b μBc

+ J/Ψμν

(arbitrary normalization)

Page 12: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (12/27

Integrated luminosity (fb–1)

BR

(x1

0–9)

Uncertainty in background prediction

Expected final CDF+D0 limit

SM prediction

90% CL imit on BR (only bkg is observed)

Integrated luminosity (fb–1)

5 observation

3 evidence

SM predictionBR

(x1

0–9)

Sensitivity to signal(signal+bkg is observed)

10-7

2x10-8

(~0.05 fb-1)

5x10-9

(~ 0.4 fb-1)

J.Ellis et al. arXiv:0709.0098v1 [hep-ph] (2007)

2 fb–1 3 evidence of SM signal

6 fb–1 5 observation of SM signal

0.5 fb–1 exclude BR values down to SM

Bs

Page 13: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (13/27

b sℓℓSuppressed loop decay in SM.

NP could contribute at the same levels, could modify BR and angular distributions.

Sensitive to SUSY, gravitation exchange, extra-dimensions.

Inclusive decay difficult to access at hadron collider.

Good prospects for exclusive decays (B Kℓℓ, K*ℓℓ ). Hadronic uncertainty reduced in:

Predicted shift in the zero of the AFB in Bd→K*in ACD model with a single universal extra dimension, a MFV model.(Colangelo et al PhysRevD73,115006(2006))

SM prediction

• Forward-backward asymmetry AFB

• Position of zero crossing of AFB (s0)

• Transversal asymmetries• Ratio of and ee modes

s0= m2 for which AFB=0

Page 14: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (14/27

Bd K*

Fast MC, 2 fb–1

AF

B(s

)

s = m2 [GeV2]

L= 2fb–1 (s0) = ±0.46 GeV2

L=10 fb–1 (s0) = ±0.27 GeV2 at the level of present theoretical precision

Measure forward-backward Asimmetry as a function of the invariant mass. Determine s0, the m2

for which AFB=0+

In SM: BR(BdK*)=(1.22 +0.38-0.32) x10-6 s0= s0(C7,C9)=4.39 +0.38

-0.35 GeV2 Beneke et al hep-ph/0412400

LHCb: 7200 signal events/2fb–1

Bbb/S = 0.2 ± 0.1 (ignoring non-resonant

K events for the time being).

With L= 0.5 fb–1 1800 events (B-Factories projected 2ab-1 yield 450 events.)

Page 15: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (15/27

Fit to full angular distributions (K-, , ) expressed in

terms of transversity amplitudes (A, A//, A0). Can measure:

BdK*transverse asymmetries

2

0

2

||

2

2

02 )(AAA

AqFL

2

||

2

2

||

2

2)2( )(AA

AAqAT

2 fb–1 10 fb–1

AT(2) 0.42 0.16

FL 0.016 0.007

AFB 0.020 0.008

Stat. precisions in the region s = m2

[1, 6] (GeV/c2)2

where theory calculations are most reliable

Curves from Lunghi & Matias JHEP 0704(2007)058. Points LHCb 2 fb-1

2 fb-1

Asymmetry AT(2) Longitudinal polarization FL

SM NLOMSSM tan=5MSSM tan=5

2 fb-1

Sensitivity with

Page 16: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (16/27

RK in B+ K+ℓℓ

001.012max

2

2max

2

4

)(

4

)(

ds

dsR

q

m dseKeBd

q

m dsKBd

K

- Large corrections O(10%) possible in models that distinguish between lepton flavours (eg.MSSM at large tan). Constraints to NP also from RK andBR(Bs→µµ) combined.

in SM (Hiller,Krüger PRD69 (2004) 074020)

LHCb 10 fb-1

Bu eeK 9.2 k events

Bu K 19 k events

stat(RK )= 0.043

• Trigger eff 70% on ee channel

under study - not included.

• Similar sensitivity expected for RK* =Bd K*/ Bd eeK*.

• To be compared with 15% error on RK&RK* combined, expected from B-Factories

with 2ab-1.

4m2< mll

2< 6 (GeV/c2)2

Page 17: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (17/27

Radiative decays

DecayYield

2 fb–1Bbb/S

Bd K* 68k 0.60

Bs 11.5k < 0.55

b (1116) 0.75k < 42

b (1670) 2.5k < 18

Bd K* ACP < 1% in SM, up to 40% in SUSY

Can measure at <% level.

Reference channel for all radiative decays.

Bs No mixing-induced CP asymmetry

in SM, up to 50% in SUSY.

Sensitivity for ACP(t) measurement under study.

b Right-handed component of photon

polarization O(10%) in SM. Can be higher BSM.

Measure photon asymmetry from angular distributions of and hadron in b (p,pK) decays.

3 evidence of right-handed component to 21% with 10 fb–1

Page 18: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (18/27

sin(2) from Tree and Penguing

B0 KS:– 920 signal events per 2 fb–1, B/S < 1.1 at 90% CL

– After 10 fb–1: stat(sin(2eff)) = 0.10

to be compared with 0.12 expected from B-Factories with 2ab-1

AC

P(t

)

ACP(t)N B 0 J /KS N B0 J /KS N B 0 J /KS N B0 J /KS

2 fb–1 (fast MC, incl. bkg)

Proper time t (ps)

B0 J/KSTime dependent CP asymmetry in B0J/KS is expected to be one of the first CP measurements at LHCb.

236k signal events / 2 fb–1 B/S=0.6(bb)+7.7(J/)

stat(sin(2)) = 0.020 in 2 fb–1

Compare to 0.019 expected from B-Factories with 2ab-1

After 10 fb–1: (sin(2)) ~ 0.010 Can also push further the search for direct CP violating term cos(mdt)

Page 19: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (19/27

bsss hadronic penguin decays

Bs

CP violation < 1% in SM due to cancellation of the

mixing and penguin phase

In SM: Bs SM 2 arg(Vts

*Vtb) – arg(VtbVts*/Vtb

*Vts) 0

NP in general affect differently Bs mixing and bs decays

NP≠0

Combining Bs with Bs

J/ measurements can disentangle NP contributions in mixing & decays.

+ NP?

J/

s

W -b

s

ccsBs

LHCb expects 3.1k signal events / 2 fb–1 (BR=1.410–5), B/S<0.8 at 90%CL

From time dependent angular distribution of flavour tagged events:

stat(NP) = 0.05 in 10 fb–1

Page 20: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (20/27

Different ways to at LHCb

B mode D mode Method

Bs→DsK KK tagged, A(t)

B+→D K+ K+ K3 KK/ counting, ADS+GLW

B+→D*K+ K counting, ADS+GLW

B+→D K+ Ks Dalitz, GGSZ

B+→D K+ KK 4 body Dalitz

B+→D K+ K 4 body Dalitz

B0→D K*0 K + KK + counting, ADS+GLW

B→,KK Tagged, A(t)

tree decays only

Page 21: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (21/27

from Bs DsK

Two tree decays which interfere via Bs mixing

Can determine +s, hence in a very clean way

LHCb expects 6.2k signal events in 2 fb–1 Bbb/S < 0.18 at 90% CL Bs Ds

–+ background 15±5 % after PID cuts

Fit 4 tagged and 2 untagged time-dependent rates.

With 10 fb–1: Tagged & untagged

Tagged only

s + 4.6 5.7

4.6 5.4

|| 0.027 0.029

(Inputs: =60, strong phase difference =0, amplitude ratio ||=0.37 )

DsK

tagged as Bs

s

s

b

c

u

s

Bs0

Ds

K

K–

s

s

b

u

c

s

Bs0

Ds

Page 22: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (22/27

Different ways to at LHCb

B mode D mode Method () 2fb-1

Bs→DsK KK tagged, A(t) 10º

B+→D K+ K+ K3+KK/

counting, ADS+GLW 5º - 13º

B+→D*K+ K counting, ADS+GLW Under study

B+→D K+ Ks Dalitz, GGSZ 7-12º

B+→D K+ KK 4 body Dalitz 18º

B+→D K+ K 4 body Dalitz Under study

B0→D K*0 K + KK + counting, ADS+GLW 9º

B→,KK Tagged, A(t) 10º

Combined LHCb sensitivity to with tree decays only (educated guess):

~ 5º with 2 fb–1 ~ 2.5º with 10 fb–1

tree decays only

Page 23: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (23/27

Charm physics• LHCb will collect a large tagged D*D0

sample (also used for PID calibration). A dedicated D* trigger is foreseen for this purpose.

– Tag D0 or anti-D0 flavour with pion from D*± D0 ±

• Performance studies not as detailed as for B physics.

• Interesting (sensitive to NP) & promising searches/measurements:– Time-dependent D0 mixing with wrong-sign D0K+– decays– Direct CP violation in D0K+K–

• ACP 10–3 in SM, up to 1% (~current limit) with New Physics• Expect stat(ACP) ~ O(10–3) with 2 fb–1

– D0+–

• BR 10–12 in SM, up to 10–6 (~current limit) with New Physics• Expect to reach down to ~510–8 with 2 fb–1

D*-tagged signal yield in 2 fb–1 (from b hadrons only)

D0K right sign 12.4 M

D0K+– wrong sign 46.5 k

D0K+K– 1.6 M

Page 24: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (24/27

LHCb physics performance summary

• “DC04” full MC simulation datasets (2004-2006) used for extensive studies of LHCb Physics performance reported in more than 30 public notes (CERN-LHCb-2007-xxx) available on LHCb web page

Can easly found from LHCb page of Physics performance: http://lhcb-phys.web.cern.ch/lhcb-phys/DC04_physics_performance/

Eg. Some of the measurements which I have not mentioned:

Bd Bd CERN-LHCb-2007-046 Bd Bs KK CERN-LHCb-2007-059 ms Bs DsCERN-LHCb-2007-017,2007-041 LFV Bd eBs eCERN-LHCb-2007-028• New set of analysis starting with “DC06” full MC simulation datasets (2006-2007)

(close-to-final detector and trigger description). Additional channels under study (eg. Bs b B+ K+ , B+ K+ + Bu D …)

Page 25: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (25/27

LHCb upgrade?• LHCb is designed to run at average luminosity of 21032 and be able to handle

51032 cm–2s–1.

– Main physics goals expressed in terms of the reach for 10 fb–1 (i.e. 5 nominal years).

• Investigating upgrade of detector to handle higher luminosity: few 1033 cm–2s–1

– Not directly coupled to SLHC machine upgrade since luminosity already available, but may well overlap in time with upgrades of ATLAS and CMS.

• Working group set up to identify the R&D required to make an upgrade of LHCb feasible ( increase trigger efficiency for hadronic modes by a factor two, fast vertex detection, electronics, radiation dose, pile-up, higher occupancy etc.) and to make the physics case.

• Input welcome from theorists on: What is the effective relevance of a statistical increase from 10 to 100 fb-1 on the constraints to Physics BSM which could be derived?

Which are the measurements which we should push to highest possible precision?

Where do we clash against theoretical uncertainties at (or before) 100 fb-1 ?

Page 26: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (26/27

LHCb beyond 10 fb–1 ?

• CPV in Bs mixing, in particular in b sss penguins

aim for 0.01 (0.002) precision on Bs (Bs J/) CP asymmetry

• angle with theoretically clean methods, e.g. BsDsK, BD(KS)K, B D(hh)K

aim for < 1 precision on angle

• Chiral structure of b s (bsl+l–) using polarization of real (virtual) photon

more detailed and precise analysis of exclusive modes, e.g. AT(2) in B0 K*

Several measurements limited by statistical precision after 10 fb-1:

Page 27: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (27/27

Conclusions

• LHCb is ready for data taking at 2008 LHC start-up.

• Very interesting results will come already with first 0.1-0.5 fb-1 of data:

-- Bs J/Bs , Bd K0*

but also: Bs Bd DK, Bd,s ,KK,K….

• Actively preparing for analysis of several channels with high potential

for indirect NP discovery and for elucidating its flavour structure.

• LHCb results will provide in particular a strong improvement to the

knowledge of all Bs sector. Welcome all suggestions from theory side for

new interesting channels to explore.

Page 28: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (28/27

BACK-UP

Page 29: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (29/27

from B±→ D0K ± (ADS)

colour suppressedus

cub

u

B

0D

Ku

su

cbu

B

K

0Dcolour favoured

• Charged B decay

u

du

scu

0D K

Cabibbo favoureddoubly Cabibbo suppressedu

us

dcu

0D

K

Atwood, Dunietz and Soni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3257 (1997).

5 parameters (rB, rD, δB, δD, γ), but only 3 relative decay rates.rD well-measured, but δD poorly constrained by CLEO-c ( expect cosδD~20%)

• D0 and D0 can both decay into K-π+ (or K+π- )

Weak phase difference –Strong phase difference B Amplitude ratio rB ~ 0.08

Strong phase difference DK

Amplitude ratio rD K=0.060±0.003

)cos(2)())((

),cos(2)(1))((

),cos(2)())((

),cos(2)(1))((

22

2

22

2

KDB

KDB

KDBD

KDB

KDB

KDBD

KDB

KDB

KDBD

KDB

KDB

KDBD

rrrrKKB

rrrrKKB

rrrrKKB

rrrrKKB

wrong sign, high sensitivity to

right sign, lower sensitivity to

Page 30: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (30/27

from B± DK± (ADS+GLW)

ADS+GLW strategy:

Measure the relative rates of B– DK– and B+ DK+ decays with neutral D’s observed in final states K–+ and K+–, and also:

• D0→ K–+–+ and K+–+–: add 3 observables,1 unknown strong phase δK3π, 1 well measured rel. decay rate rD

K3π

• CP eigenstate decays D0→K+K–/ +– : add 1 observable and 0 unknown

Can solve for all unknowns, including the weak phase

Decay 2 fb–1 yield Bbb/S

B–,+ D(K) K–,+ favoured 28k, 28k 0.6

B–,+ D(K) K–,+ favoured 28k, 28k 0.6

B–,+ D(K) K–,+ suppr. 393, 8 2.0, 98

B–,+ D(K) K–,+ suppr. 516, 99 1.5, 8

B–,+ D(hh) K–,+ 4.3k, 3.5k 1.7, 2.1

() = 5–13 with 2 fb–1

Use of B± D* (D0,D) K± under study

depending on D strong phases

Gronau, London, Wyler, PLB. 253, 483 (1991)

( Inputs: =60, rB =0.077, B =130, δKπ = -8.3, δK3π = -60)

Page 31: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (31/27

(770)

K*(892)

D0

m2(KS+)

m2 (

KS–

)

from B±D0K± (GGSZ) D0 decays into a 3- body CP eigenmode: D0KS

0

Large strong phases between the intermediate resonances allow the extraction of rB, δB, and γ

by studying the D-Dalitz plots from B+ and B– decays

Assume no CP violation in D0 decays

B decay amplitudes:

A(BDK) AD(mKs2,mKs

2)+ rBei(B) AD(mKs

2,mKs2)

A(BDK) AD(mKs2,mKs

2)+ rBei(B) AD(mKs

2,mKs2)

Need to assume a D0 decay model.

Current isobar model used at B factories syst() = 10

Giri, Grossman, Soffer, Zupan, PRD 68, 050418 (2003).

stat() = 7–12 with 2 fb–1

stat() = 4–6 (10 fb–1) syst() = 3–4

Depending on bkg assumptions

At LHCb:

5k signal events in 2 fb–1

B/S = 0.24 (D0±), Bbb/S < 0.7

With more statistics plan to do a model-independent analysis

and control model systematics using CLEO-c data at (3770)

Page 32: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (32/27

• Treat with same ADS+GLW method as charged case:

– So far used only D decays to K–+, K+–, K+K– and +– final states

• Envisage also GGSZ analysis

Weak phase difference = Magnitude ratio = rB ~ 0.4

D0

d

b

d

s

c

u

B0

K*0

colour-suppressed

d

b

d

s

u

c

B0

D 0

K*0

colour-suppressed

Decay mode (+cc) 2 fb–1 yield Bbb/S

B0 (K+–)D K*0 3400 0.4–2.0

B0 (K–+)D K*0 540 2.2–13

B0 (K+K–)D K*0 470 < 4.1

B0 (–+)D K*0 130 < 14

() = 9 with 2 fb–1

from B0 D0K*0

Page 33: LHCb Physics prospects

M. Calvi Interplay of Collider and Flavour Physics, 04/12/2007 (33/27

from B and BsKK

Measure CP asymmetry in each mode:

LHCb 2 fb–1 36k B , Bbb/S ~0.5, Bhh/S =0.07 36k Bs KK, Bbb/S<0.06, Bhh/S =0.07

~ 2x better than current B world average

Adir and Amix depend on mixing phase, angle , and Penguin/Tree amplitude ratio dei

Exploit U-spin symmetry (Fleischer): If assume: d=dKK and =KK 4 measurements and 3 unknowns

can solve for (taking 2 and s from other modes)

ACP

(t ) Adir cos(m t )Amix sin(m t )

cosh t / 2 A sinh t / 2 Assume only 0.8< dKK/d <1.2

and let , KK free

2 fb–1

10 fb–1

stat() = 10+ fake solution

stat() = 5+ decreased fake


Recommended