Date post: | 25-May-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | hoangthuan |
View: | 224 times |
Download: | 1 times |
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC) for (Urban) rail infrastructure
26 June 2010Final conference, Prague
Gerald Hamöller
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
2
Urban Track…Economic Evaluation…
Sub-project 4
> Leader: TransportTechnologie-Consult Karlsruhe GmbH (TTK, Germany)
> Life cycle costing (LCC)> Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH
(DI, Germany)
> Socio-economic assessment> University Hasselt, Institute of Mobility
(UHASSELT, Belgium)
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
3
Objectives…LCC calculations and evaluation
LCC calculations by SP1 (M24) and SP2 (M36) to support research in laboratory situation Comparison of a two prognoses: A state-of-the-art-solution compared to an Urban Track-developed new solution for a hypothetic site (based on assumptions)
LCC calculations by SP3: Evaluation of expected results „Post-Installation" based on individual maintenance regime and cost structure of the operator (M48).
Comparison of one prognosis to one analysis: "pre-installation" LCC-prognosis (M36)compared to an updated calculation of the same case considering lessons learned fromreality (measurements, improvements, feedbacks) for the specific building site (based on real investment and costs)
LCC calculations by SP3: Prognosis of expected results „Pre-Installation" based on individual maintenance regime and cost structure of the operator (M36).
Comparison of two prognoses: A state-of-the-art-solution in comparison to an Urban Track-developed new solution for the specific building site (based on assumptions)
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
4
Background…Goals…
Background> No harmonised LCC calculation methodology for Urban rail infrastructure was
available
Goals> Development of LCC calculation methodology> Create a common understanding with all involved stakeholders
(e.g. infrastructure operators, supplying industry, researchers)> foster acceptance of the methodology and > Support a beginning harmonisation process
> Development of software tool for LCC calculations
> Evaluation of LCC within the Urban Track project
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
6
LCC…Cost Matrix…Standard EN 60300-3-3
Life Cycle Phases
Technical Structure
Cost Classes
Cost Class:Materials
Life Cycle Phase Operations
Component A
Cost Element:Materials cost, component A inLife Cycle Phase Operations
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
7
Acquisition-cost
Ownership-cost
Scrapping
Comissioning
Operation
Design
Manufacture
(Prototype)
(Test)
(Series-)Production
De-comissioning
Cost attributionspecific to project
LCC…Definition of cost categories…life cycle phase…
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
8
Ownership cost
Acquisition cost
LCC
Quality
Urban Track aims on25% LCC-Reduction
Cost
LCC…product quality…
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
10
Only an impression of the tool...
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
11
Access for interested parties…www.infracalcc.de…
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
12
Overview of studied test sites…
Testsite (WP - Product) pre-installation post-installation
Madrid (3.1 – REMS)
Brussels (3.2 – Green tracks)
London (3.3 – joints between street and rail) (cancelled) (cancelled)
Seville (3.4 – iX-Modulix/Modulix)
Bremen (3.5 – construction techniques)
Brussels (3.6 – Alternative floating slab)
Brussels (3.7 – Elastiplus)
Barcelona (3.8 – Elatiplus) (cancelled) (cancelled)
Karlsruhe (3.9 – Re-Modulix)
Manila (3.10 – Booted bi-block sleepers)
Valenciennes test center (3.11: Resiliently supported sleepers)
Brussels (3.12: Prefab track systems)
Reims (3.13: Apitrack)
Flanders (3.14 – Joints between street and rail) (not relevant) (not relevant)
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
13
Example of Seville (iX-Modulix)…
Evaluation of an innovative product
Installation was effected in the crossing of a new LRT line with Avenida Constitución
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
14
Example of Seville (iX-Modulix)…
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
15
Example of Sevilla (iX-Modulix)…
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
16
Overview…Expected LCC-Results and evaluation
Evaluation met allexpectations
Evaluation showedbetter results
X
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
17
Beyond Urban Track…Possible application…
> (Superstructure) product decisions
> Network extensions
> Renewal and refurbishment measures
> Cost driver analysis (cost transparency)
> General identification of cost saving potential
> Modification of the maintenance regime
> Optimising preventive maintenance against the economic background
> Economic assessment of maintenance interval changes
© TTK GmbH, Die Ingenieurwerkstatt GmbH, Universiteit Hasselt 2010
Life Cycle Costing (LCC)
18
For further information…
Gerald HamöllerTransportTechnologie-Consult GmbH (TTK)Gerwigstraße 5376131 Karlsruhe
[email protected]+49 721 62 50 3-22
www.ttk.dewww.ingenieurwerkstatt.dewww.urbantrack.euwww.urbantrack-sp4.euwww.infracalcc.de