Like concepts repel unlike concepts attract

Pask’s “Last Theorem”For ALL forces:

Gravitional, Electromagnetic, Weak and Strong nuclear force

Pask concept definition

Any circular persisting process in any medium

• Solid

• Liquid

• Gas

• Plasma

A Spin exerting a parity, like or unlike, clockwise or anti-clockwise for a given observer in a given context and perspective.

System boundary problem. Surface interactions. The sewage Farm

The Proof outlined

• Consider the parallel axis spin case(Wiener’s stable parallel self organisation case for

the “attraction of frequencies”)• Gravitational case• A car stationary at the earths equator (weighs

less than at a pole).• [In general a Coriolis or geostrophic force will

also be exerted (off the equator) for any movement on an orbiting body. This is a natural manifestation of Pask’s third closure force of the Borromean triple.]

The car moves

• Ignoring Coriolis effects

• To the West spins add and car is lighter because of increased centrifugal force

• To the East spins subtract and the car is heavier because of decreased centrifugal force

• Like spin or angular momentum repels

• Unlike spin or angular momentum attracts

Spin TheoremGravitational case

EARTH

CAR

EARTH

CAR

EARTH

CAR

Like spinsCar lighter

Like spins repel

One spinCar on equator

Unlike spinsCar heavier

Unlike spins attract

Calculate the centrifugal force on the car

Bohr ModelElectrostatic Attraction Case

No electrostatic forces only attracting and repelling spin forces

Coupling the unlike anti-parallel spins effectively increases the Newtonian Gravitational constant by 1040

Ks>>Ko

Orbital spin Very low

Electron SpinVery high Proton

Gravitational attraction only

The quantum Bohr model

• Assume gravitational attraction and no electrostatic forces. Bohr radius huge.

• Using ionization energy of hydrogen atom find spin kinetic energy of electron.

• Spin the electron opposite to the proton spin apply the unlike spins rule and the correct Bohr radius is produced

Laithwaite’s Conical PendulumThe quantum as a precession

phenomenon?

Like spin

Spin

Unlike spin

Using Angular Momentum we unify a dynamical treatment of

electromagnetic and gravitational forces

• No magnetic fields, North South poles etc• No electrostatic fields, positive negative charges• Just instantaneous conservation of angular momentum• No more Forces just angular momentum to account for action at a

distance and instantaneous gravitational attraction as seemed implicit in Whitehead’s “Process and Reality”.

• Since weak and strong nuclear forces involve transfer of momentum as per QED/QCD a similar treatment may be assumed applicable

• Einstein’s dream realised?

Anthony Osborne and Viv Pope

• “An Angular Momentum Synthesis of ‘Gravitational’ and ‘Electrostatic’ Forces” Galilean Electrodynamics, Vol 14, Special Issue 1, Spring 2003, pp. 9 - 19

• http://www.poams.org/lib/pub/pub_an_angular_momentum_synthesis.pdf

• POAMS: 'Pope-Osborne Angular Momentum Synthesis'

• Members of the ANPA Group

Coupling: General case

Where J is total angular momentum L is orbital

and S is spin angular momentumφ is the angle between L and S, the couplingWhen Φ= π/2 coupling is serial and weak or decoherent. (Cf Wiener “attraction and repulsion of frequencies”)

Like spins

• The relativistic condition

• There are no doppelgangers

• Likeness, faith and duration

• Recursive packing: telephone cable

• Unfoldment- thought

A medium eg a star or a brain

Participant (A) Participant (B)

Repulsion of two recursively concepts after observation or interaction unfolding for time, T

Distinction develops as interaction persists. The Faith to produce a product. “in the rigorous sense of an iterative refinement of meaning.” IAT para 197

Like concepts repelling: a thought.Indeterminacies (or uncertainties?)a. Of foci of, thought or attention, from which to unfold.b. Truncation and selection of unfoldment, given its origin

Fourier decomposition operates.

Pask never nominated a fundamental frequency. Enter the Planck frequency?

An entailment structure in a void/not void space

What’s all this Brunnian stuff?The removal of any component leaves a set of trivial unlinked unknots

The Borromean Link fills three dimensional space. This suggests three axes for coherent entanglement

Quantum entanglement and topological entanglement, Kaufmann and Lomonaco (2002)

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1367-2630/4/1/373/nj2173.html

How is three dimensional space filled?

The three repulsive forces of a minimal hard carapace.

The minimal mechanical requirement for existence.

The Snelson/Fuller prismatic tensegrity or octet truss

Symmetry: mirror image enantiamorphic pairs

P McGuinness, et al "The optimal tap: three-dimensional nozzle design" (J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 38 (2005) 3382–3386) – Triangular nozzles produce smaller droplets than circular.

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0022-3727/38/18/009/d5_18_009.pdf

The Pask Forces Diagram

Axioms from Interactions of Actors Theory Kybernetes: Vol. 33 No. 9/10, 2004,

The repulsive – carapace- force is signed with screw symmetry due to packed braids which are not perspective dependent (unlike spin).

The Carapace of Repulsive Force around a section of a closed loop concept process from Pask 1993

SynchronisationBoth in phase and out of phase.

Baker and Blackburn in “The Pendulum” OUP 2005 conclude

Weak driving with strong coupling=> synchronisation or coherence

Strong driving with weak coupling=>

unsynchronisation or decoherence

“There are no doppelgangers”Pask and Relativistic Compliance

• Consider a pair of hydrogen atoms as counters or clocks.• Acceleration histories of the two atoms will never be the

same- even if frozen as water ice.• Time dilatation and relativistic mass or energy

considerations will show at some level of precision the atomic spectra of the atoms will be different.

• While coherent as eg dihydrogen their clocks will synchronise but their phase history will remain different (Thanks Tony) and the counts distinct.

• Two observers (or actors) may share a context but their different perspectives guarantees the no doppelgangers theorem.

• Best and worst case differences can be quantified.

Time is Incommensurable for Actors

• The Lambda matrix for actors• A matrix of matrices or a matrix of vectors?• Certainly a list of interactions for all Actor

Interactions.• Thus x,t(j)), B(y,t(k))) represents an

interaction between Actors A and B at time at actor A's time t(j).

• De Zeeuw argues the vector t(n) should be matrix.

• This requires all concurrent events to be coherent. An interaction produces decoherence. We ponder.

Conjecture

• A given coherent set or persisting object exerts a net parity

• Coupling constants deriving from decoherence produce magnitudes

The unobserved and the elementary: a new classification

• Bogons and

• Morons

• A Coriolis-like effect of the dynamical boson-fermion interaction in the interacting boson-fermion model.

• Physics Letters B, vol.199, no.4, 31 Dec. 1987, pp.482-8. Netherlands.V. Paar (Univ. Zagreb)